ML20057B420

Notice of Violation from Insp on 930628-0730.Violation Noted:Design Control Measures Had Not Assured Design Bases Were Properly Translated Into Min Terminal Voltage Specified by Battery Svc Test Surveillance Procedure SP-523,Rev 28

ML20057B420
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	09/10/1993
From:	NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20057B419	List: ML20057B418 ML20057B420 ML20057B421
References
50-302-93-18, NUDOCS 9309220002
Download: ML20057B420 (2)

Text

.

' *- i

. j i

ENCLOSURE 1  :

NOTICE OF VIOLATION l

Florida Power Corporation Docket No.

50-302 l Crystal River 3 License No.: DPR-72 l During an NRC inspection conducted on June 28 - July 30, 1993, violations of i

NRC requirements were identified. In accordance with the " General Statement l of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," the violations are listed below. ,

A. 10 CFR 50 Appendix B, Criterion III, requires design control measures I which assure that regulatory requirements and design bases are properly translated into drawings, speciffrations, instructions, and procedures.

Contrary to the above, on July 15, 1993, the licensee's design control measures had not assured that design bases were properly translated into the minimum terminal voltage specified by battery service test surveil-lance procedure SP-523, Rev. 28. Design calculation E-90-0100, Rev. 2, dated June 12, 1993, determined that the minimum terminal voltage required of each safety-related battery was about 111' V. Surveillance procedure SP-523, Rev. 28, dated February 25, 1993, specified a lower minimum required battery terminal voltage of 105 V. There was no calculation to demonstrate, for the battery test load profile, that 105 V would be sufficient to assure operation of safety loads. The service test was required by Technical Specification 4.8.2.3.2.

l This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1).

B. 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, requires that drawings used for

activities affecting quality provide criteria for determining that the

activities are satisfactorily accomplished. Additionally, Criterion V requires the activities to be accomplished in accordance with the drawing j criteria.

1 l Contrary to the above, on June 3a, 1993, activities affecting quality had not been satisfactorily accomplished in accordance with the criteria of I the applicable drawings. Breakers and breaker settings and a thermal overload device in safety-related motor control centers (MCCs) were not 4

in accordance with the drawings used for their verification. Examples were as follows:

4 In MCC 3A1, Cubicles IBR, 7A, and 2C, the circuit breaker trip

, settings were in the "Hi" position instead of the "Lo" position specified by Drawing EC-206-054, Rev. 22.

In MCC 3A2, Cubicle SAL, a 70 ampere circuit breaker was installed instead of the 80 ampere breaker specified by Drawing EC-206-055, Rev. 14.

4 1

9309220002 9ao93o P

$DR ADocg 050g939g &p;?

PDR

4 . ,

Florida Power Corporation 2 Docket No. 50-302 Crystal River 3 License No. DPR-72 f

In MCC 3AB, Cubicle 20, the circuit breaker trip setting was set on the "2" position instead of the "Lo" position specified by Drawing EC-206-058, Rev. 12.

In MCC 3B2, Cubicle 68, a N22 thermal overload was installed '

instead of the N23 type specified by Drawing EC-206-057, Rev. 11. ,

, This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement 1).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Florida Power Corporation is

hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the U.S.

4 Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington, D.C.

20555 with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Resident Inspector at the Crystal River 3 facility, within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice of Violation (Notice). This reply i should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should 6 include for each violation

(1) the reason for the violation, or, if contest-ed, the basis for disputing the violation, (2) the corrective steps that have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps that will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will 5

be achieved. If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order or Demand for Information may be. issued as to why the license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked, or why such other i action as may be proper should not be taken. Where good cause is shown, i j consideration will be given to extending the response time. '

Dated at Atlanta, Georgia 4

this 10th day of September 1993 i

i .

I a

4 g

)

--~,,.-~r a v , -- , , v