ML20056G737

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Comments on Draft Region V Realignment Study.On Page 29 of Draft Realignment for Option 1,addl Advantage for Combined Iv/V Should Be Included
ML20056G737
Person / Time
Issue date: 09/07/1993
From: Paul Goldberg
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Jonathan Montgomery
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20056G560 List:
References
NUDOCS 9309070104
Download: ML20056G737 (2)


Text

-

w.

[

4, UNITED STATES -

p NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSK)N g

,i REG 60N V '

8 1450 MARIA LANE

,8 WALNLF CREEK. CAUFORNIA 94596-5368 MEMORANDUM FOR:

John M. Montgomery Deputy Regional Administrator FROM:

Paula A. Goldberg Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Projects

SUBJECT:

COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT REGION V REALIGNMENT STUDY On page 29 of the draft realignment for Option 1, an additional advantage for j

a combined Region IV/V should be included. That is, for both Regions IV and V j

personnel there would bean increase in inspector objectivity due to increasing i

the number of plants from 8 to 12.

j I

On page 30, the Region V staff express a concern about loosing the 8% high cost of living pay adjustment by moving to Arlington.

The study should point -

3 out that the loss of this 8% cost of -living adjustment would be more' than l

compensated for by the fact that Texas has no state income tax and that the cost of housing would be significantly lower than in California.

Paula A. Goldberg Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch Division of Reactor Projects p; ;% -

c..

,k '.

9309070104 930012 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR 128

v v

i

i APPENDIX 16 i

a i

NRC HEADQUARTERS OFFICE AND REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR COMMENTS REGARDING THE REGION V REALIGNMENT STUDY DRAFT REPORT DATED MAY 24,1993 l

129

.