ML20054F162
| ML20054F162 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 06/07/1982 |
| From: | BWR OWNERS GROUP |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20054F159 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-820607, NUDOCS 8206150271 | |
| Download: ML20054F162 (95) | |
Text
,. _ _ _... -. -...
i P
,t t
ll i
9 1
F i
P i
1 l
I i
l 1
3 t
i j
r f
ATTACHMENT 1 i
"BWR OWNERS GROUP CONTROL ROOM SURVEY WORKSHOP SUPPLEMENT" v
t t
t I
l l
l i
1
)
I i
t i-
.l@
8206150271 820607 I
PDR ADOCK 05000440 I
E PDR i
.-...m-m__,
_-r,.
ese O
BWR OWNERS GROUP CONTROL ROOM SURVEY WORKSHOP g g _
u, O
g R,g LQ??
/
O SUPPLEMENT
O CONTROL ROOM SURVEY WORKSHOP SUPPLEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GUIDANCE ON PREPARING FOR THE SURVEY TEAM 1.1 General 1.2 Plant Access 1.3 LER's 1.4 Operator Interviews 1.5 Task Analyses 1.6 Control Room Review 1.7 Checklist Items Requiring Advance Research 2.0 CONTROL ROOM SURVEY TECHNIQUES 2.1 Advance Preparations 2.2 Duties and Responsibilities of Team Members 2.3 Survey Scheduling 2.4 The First Day 2.5 LER Analysis 2.6 Operator Interview 2.7 Control Room Review 2.8 Lighting and Sound Surveys 2.9 Photographic Support 2.10 Task Analysis 2.11 Emergency Procedure Walkthroughs 2.12 Exit Interview 2.13 Results Reporting 2.14 Control Room Decorum
a a
-an
.w gg a
a a
- A
&EW&
0-CONTROL ROOM SURVEY WORKSNOP SUPPLEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) 1 SURVEY TEAM MEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES JOB STATUS CHECKSHEET SUGGESTED SURVEY TIMELINE
- i SAMPLE INTERVIEW SUP91ARY FORM i
SAMPLE TRANSIENT SCENARIOS l
ANNOTATED CONTROL ROOM SURVEY CHECKLIST l
P
O 1.0 GUIDANCE ON PREPARING FOR THE SURVEY TEAM Adequate preparations and research by the on-site team representative is an essential phase of the overall survey effort. These initial efforts lay the foundation for the survey team's review; a thorough effort will greatly simplify their job. The following coments provide guidance on several aspects of this task which must be con-sidered and a detailed explanation of checklist items requiring advance attention.
1.1 General o
Make copies of all necessary papemork: operator intervieus, interview comment and summary forms, checklist comment forms, control room arrangement diagrams and the checklists themselves.
o Decide which panels need to be examined in the Control Room Review. This should include all backpanels and auxiliary panels O
containing controls and displays normally used by the control room operator. Review this list with control room operators to insure all necessary panels are considered.
Prepare enough copies of the checklists (sections A, B, and C) for all panels involved.
l o
For multi-unit control rooms, prepare a list of comon panels and differences between units. This will prevent needless repetition in the survey.
Identical panels need only be revier ance.
i o
If available, obtain copies of the control room floor plan for l
survey team members showing panel numbers and locations. From this drawing, complete the Control Room Arrangement Diagram included in the checklists, drawing in the operators desk, computer console, peripheral panel, procedure storage area, doors, l
ctc.
' O _
~
l O
o Insure an alternate is available for yourself in case f
of emergency or illness. He should be cognizant of the survey program and kept informed of its status.
If possible, an operator (other than those on shift) should be o
available full time, or at least for one day to assist the survey team and answer questions. An operator will also be needed for at least one additional day to assist in performing the procedure walkthroughs.
o Discuss the Control Room Survey program with the plant manage-ment. Explain the background, content and scope of the review and request their support in making preparations for the team's arrival.
Shift supervisors and control room operators should be informed the survey team will be present and made aware of the nature of the survey. A letter will be sent from the Owners' Group to the utility management prior to the team's arrival confirming scheduling of the survey, introducing the team leader and summarizing the program.
Investigate available accommodations for survey team members and the loca-o tion of the nearest airport. A map giving directions to the hotel and I
to the site will prove very helpful. Consider reserving a block of rooms for team members, particularly if your company has discount arrangements with a local establishment.
Make arrangements to have a room available to the team for dis-o cussions on at least the first two days, preferably the entire time of the survey.
Arrange a meeting the first day to introduce team members to the o
plant management.
l'O l
o Insure all required equipment is avai.lable. This includes the following items:
Steel measuring tape Light meter Sound meter Thermometer Hygrometor 35 m camera with film Polaroid camera with film A light meter, and sound meter, will be supplied by General Electric, if participating on the survey team.
1.2 Plant Access o
Contact the security coordinator to obtain information on what requirements must be met. Determine the easiest method of obtaining security access for the team. Team members should ideally have unrestricted access to the control room. Also consider obtaining access after normal working hours and on weekends. Some plants, particularly those with computer controlled security systems require reparate authorization for thesc times.
o Investigate rad con requirements for badging.
Note that uncontrolled access to radiation areas is not necessary.
o Schedule any necessary security and rad con briefings for the day of the survey team's arrival.
1.3 LER's o
Obtain copies of all LER's and scram reports for the previous two years which were possibly caused by, or related to, operator error.
O -
l o
Fill out the first two columns of the LER Sumary Form on page 14 of the survey checklists.
Be prepared to discuss and evaluate this material upon arrival o
of the survey team.
1.4 Operator Interviews o
Decide which operators will participate. The selection should represent about one-third of the licensed operators and include a broad range of experience, education and physical size. Consult with the operations supervisor in this decision, o
Distribute questionaires to the operators selected. Explain the nature of the program and the use to be made of their responses.
Make a copy of each completed questionaire for review by the survey o
team. The operators should retain the originals and bring them to the oral interviews.
o Schedule times and locations for the oral interviews.
- Ideally, this should be on day shift, nearby the control room.
1.5 Task Analyses Prepare transient scenarios for a relief valve failure, a small o
break within the containment and a complete loss of feedwater, referring to those supplied as a guide. The following outlines should serve as a basis:
Relief valve failure:
A single relief valve actuates at nonnal operating conditions and will not respond to operator attempts to close it.
The transient is terminated when the reactor is scramed.
O. _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
O Small break:
The reactor scrams on high drywell pressure. All emergency systems operate correctly, HPCI (or equivalent) maintains water level. Terminate when level is under control.
Loss of feedwater:
Assume all feedwater pumps trip due to an unknown cause.
HPCI initiates and maintains water level. Terminate when level is stabilized.
If no specific procedures is a'vailable for a complete loss of feedwater, use the low water level procedure.
Prepare the task analysis forms, referring to directions given o
in the instructions on page 81 of the survey checklists. Take time to do a thorough job; this is an important step.
If desired, the General Electric engineer assigned to your team will provide assistance.
1.6 Control Room Review Many of the checklist items require prior research in order to perform an accurate evaluation. Generally these require either locating a particular administrative procedure or consultation with operators and plant engineers. Occassionally, consulting prints or schematics may be necessary. All items requiring preparation have been marked >
by an asterisk in the survey checklists. The attached list cross-references these items and supplies additional guidance on exactly what information is required.
It is not necessary to actually rate any of those items for degree of compliance. Where an administrative procedure must be located, it is only necessary to indicate the applicable section. Where consulta-tion with operators is required, only the data need be collected; actual evaluation will be performed by the survey team.
O - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l1 \\
1.7 Checklist Items Requiring Advance Research A4.1 -~ Locate any document detailing a plant standard for indicating lights, mimics, panel cohrs, system color coding, etc.
If no document has been written, consult with operations and engineering staff te find out if a "de facto" standard exists.
A5.10 - Ask operators to find examples of labels which do not accurately and succintly state the function of the corresponding device, and those whose wording or abbreviations are abstruse.
A6.4 - See A5.10 A6.2, 6. 3, 6.5, 6.7 - Locate the administrative procedure controlling changes and additions to control panels. These should describe permissible applications, required documentation and review methods.
Bl.2 - Ask operators to identify controllers with which they have had difficulty (too much play, knob too small, too touchy, too coarse, etc.).
Bl.4 - Question operators.
B2.3 - Locate instruments scaled such that the operator must make a conversion to obtain the desired information.
Consultation with operators may be necessary. Conversion charts taped to panels are a key.
82.7 - Ask operators to identify control / displays that do not follow the conventions described in the workshop handout material.
Example: GEMAC controllers in which a downward movement of the thu.nbwheel results in an upward tape movement.
B2.8 - Ask operators to identify sets of indicators in which direct comparisons must be made, and in which they find comparison difficult.
Example: water level indications. _
OV B2.11 - List, with operator assistance, those which have either too few or too many graduations.
B2.16 - Locate the maintenance or I&C procedure detailing calibration requirements.
B2.17 - Consult with operations and engineering personnel to determine indicator failure modes.
B3.5 - Ask operators where and when high speed capabilities are required by procedure or would be desirable, whera it is available and where they would like it to be available.
B3.12, 3.13 - Determine if an administrative procedure exists requiring such marking.
B4.2, 4.7 - These two items will require consultation with both opera-tions and engineering personnel.
Reference to schematics may be necessary. Look for generalizations (valve position indication, breaker indication, pump running if ghts, pressure normal lights, etc.) and any known differences for single systems or components.
B4.4 - How would an operator know if a light is burned out?
B4.5 - Ask taperators and/or maintenance personnel if they have experienced difficulty in changing bulbs.
Investigate different types of lights such as valve indications, breaker lights, annuncia-ters, full core display, LED's, push-button indicators, etc.
B4.8 - Relates to B4.7 (see B4.2 above). Ask operator what backups are available for items noted under B4.7.
B5.5, 5.7 - Qestion operators to identify exceptions.
86.4 - Locate procedures applying to these switches..
m l
B7.1 - Ask operators if they would ever need to use a keylock switch imediately and if a slight delay (1-5 minutes) could result in serious consequences.
B7.4 - Locate the administrative procedure describing key control, use, authorization and checkout.
I B7.5 - Locate procedures describing when and how major control room keylock switches may be used. Examples: SBLC, auto initiation bypass switches, group isolation bypass switches, TIP shear valve, etc.
87.6 - Ask operators to point out exceptions.
C2.5 - See A5.10 C8 - Look for administrative or maintenance procedures covering these items.
D2, 3.5, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.5 - Assistance from the plant computer engineer will be necessary for these items.
Check with operators to verify computer capabilities during transients. A printout of a scram sequence may be helpful.
D4.6, 4.7 - Check with operators.
El.6 - Determine whether these are available in the control room and discussed in training programs.
E3 - Is there a procedure in effect detailing standardized requirements in these areas?
E4.4 - Ask operators if they have discovered procedures in which a cautionary statement is necessary, but is not present or is mis-placed within the procedure..
E4.9, 4.10, 4.15, 4.18, 4.19 - As in E4.4, question operators to locate examples of discrepancies.
E4.22 - Ask operators if sufficient guidance is available in this area under multiple failure conditions.
E6 - Locate the procedure describing accepted methods of procedure revision and required documentation.
E7 - Locate administrative procedures detailing control room logkeeping requirements.
F1.2, 1.4, 1.5 - Obtain inputs from operations personnel.
F2.3 - Determine if testing is required by procedure and the frequency with which it is performed.
O F5.2 - Consult with the fire marshall and operations personnel.
F6.1 - Locale the administrative procedure controlling control room access.
F6.5 - List the items available and ask operators if they have experienced trouble in their use or would anticipate trouble.
F6.7 - Check the procedure describing operator duties and responsibilities to see if this item is covered.
F6.8 - Determine if de-energizing normal control room lighting is possible and acceptable to plant management. Alternatives to consider: delay this item until the next shutdown, turn off lights sequentially while in communication with the control room.
F7.4 - Investigate administrative procedures controlling conduct in the O
control room to see if this is included... - -. - - _ _ _
O G1 - Check the administrative procedure governing operator responsibilities.
3 G2 - Locate the procedure for jumper and lifted lead control.
G3 - Locate any applicable administrative procedure.
G4 - Locate the tagout procedure.
G5.3 - Consult with operators and maintenance personnel to detennine if special tools are required and if they are available.
G6 - Look up these items in the appropriate maintenance procedures.
H1 - Consult with the training coordinator to obtain answers for these items.
O H2 - Locate administrative procedures describing operator duties and i
responsibilities.
l H3.1 - Question operators and shift supervisors.
I H3.2, 3.3 - Locate administrative procedures for shift change.
O __
O 2.0 CONTROL ROOM SURVEY TECHNIQUES 2.1 Advance Preparations Much time, effort and expense can be saved during the control room survey through effective pre-planning and preparation. This function is therefore one of the most important tasks assigned to the host utility team member and can significantly affect the success of the survey project, laying the groundwork for arrival of the team proper.
A list of items which should be considered nas been supplied separately, but some items warrant additional discussion here.
One of the first things to be decided must be the scheduling of the actual survey. Final arrangements should be made between the on-site team member and his team leader as soon as possible to insure that necessary arrangements may be made without conflict. Obviously, this must be commonly agreed between the plant management and the survey team, satisfying the desires and limitations of both. Among other considerations may be other evolutions scheduled at the plant, planned outages, availability of operators and survey team members, holidays, scheduling of other surveys, licensing dates and the timing of NRC control room audits. Once the date has been decided, the team leader should contact the other team members and General Electric to relay this information. General Electric will be responsible for contacting our human factors consultants to arrange for their participation.
It should be noted that participation of General Electric and MIT remains the option of the host utility, but if they elect not to request such assistance, it must be their responsibility to make other arrangements for preparation of the suninary report and the presence of an HFE consultant.
Another subject which must be investigated by the host utility team member is arranging site access for team members. Requirements vary so widely from plant to plant that this question must be answered on a case-by-case basis. There may be fonns which must be filled out in advance, or a need for NRC Form 4's or employment history letters. _- _ _
This infonnation should be given to the team leader who will relay it to his team menbers.
If at all possible, team members should be allowed unrestricted access to the control room at any time of the day.
It is anticipated that at least two weeks will be required for the host utility team member to adequately prepare for the arrival of the survey team. Among the most important of his duties is insuring that plant management understands the Control Room Survey and will support the activities of the Owners' Group team. To assist the site representative in this regard, a brief sununary of the project has been prepared and will be sent under a cover letter to the utility management prior to arrival of the team.
Any misunderstandings or disagreements should be identified and resolved prior to arrival of the team. The host utility member should also provide information on the background and purpose of the survey to operations personnel so that they will anticipate the team's presence and understand its function.
Team members must also prepare themselves for the survey, the first one undoubtedly requiring extra effort. A review of handout material supplied at the workshop, this supplement, and the checklists them-selves will prove valuable. Particular attention should be given to guidance on performing operator interviews, as this is one of the most difficult, as well as one of the most valuable, of survey methods.
2.2 Duties and Responsibilities of Team Members l
An outline of team member responsibilities accompanies this supplement I
and should be referred to for guidance. Primary responsibility for coordination of the survey lies with the team leader. He should insure all preparations have been made at the site and that all team members
- team, he will consider the l
have been informed.
Upon arrival of f desires, expertise and advice of available team members, assign areas of responsibility in performing the survey and develop a projected schedule for completion of its various phases.
'O -
The primary function of the General Electric engineer, if present on the team, is to obtain data for writing the Plant Summary Report.
He will collect the checklists as they are completed, collate the results and review them to insure he understands the consnents made by team members. Following completion of the survey, he will take this information and consolidate it into a summary report to be reviewed by the team and forwarded to the plant management.
2.3 Survey Scheduling Due to the wide variety of specific situations which may be encountered and day-to-day changes in plant status, scheduling of the survey must remain extremely flexible, accommodating the needs of the utility.
Nevertheless, some general guidelines may prove useful.
Included with this supplement is a suggested timeline for the control room survey and a job status checksheet listing the various tasks which must be per-formed. Note that a total of twelve days are allotted for the survey, including weekend work, which allows return travel on the thirteenth O-If the team elects not to work on the weekend, the survey will day.
undoubtedly extend into a third week, requiring two weekends away from home.
E.4 The First Day It may be assumed that the first day will in most cases be devoted entirely to gaining access to the site, reviewing information supplied by the on-site team member and holding preliminary discussions on the Job assignments should be decided upon at this point, and LER's, survey.
task analyses, and operator interviews reviewed.
If possible, a meeting should be scheduled with the plant management to serve as an introduction and answer any questions.
2.5 LER Analysis As discussed at the workshop, the purpose of the LER Analysis is to identify plant specific design deficiencies whic' have actually caused or contributed to operator error. When this phase was incorporated into the survey procesis, it was not known how much, if any, information.
would be obtained from the analysis; usefullness of the method was to be evaluated at the first survey. Based en the results obtained at Duane Arnold, we have concluded that this section can provide important information and so should be retained in the survey process.
Near-term and construction plants obviously have no LER's to review, so this section of the survey need not be completed. This ommission is justified since the intent of the LER Analysis is to identify plant specific problems which have actually contributed to operator error in the plant.
2.6 Operator Interview This section of the survey is perhaps one of the most valuable in terms of infonnation obtained, but is also one of the most difficult to per-fonn effectively.
Conducting interviews is an art, the skills of which must be acquired through practice.
Because we are now dealing with a multitude of personality types and attitudes, the interviewer O
must remain constantly aware of feedback from the interviewee, both verbal and non-verbal.
Failure to do so will probably destroy any rapport which exists &nd cause the operator to become uncomunicative.
The interviewers primary job is to withdraw accurate information from the person he is questioning, uncolored by his own desires, opinions or background. To do so, he must establish a free-flow of information, respect the operator and present himself as worthy of trust and respect.
It is strongly recomended that team members review the advice supplied as handout material at the Control Room Survey Workshop on conducting operator interviews.
You will find this material extremely useful.
In addition, the following coments are supplied:
Beware of leading the operator into responses you wish to hear; o
don't put words into his mouth. This can be done in may ways, often unconsciously. Suggesting examples from other plants, pointing out deficiencies you have observed and relating the O~
thoughts of other operators all detract from the impartiality of the interview. _ _
I O
o Avoid exprening your own opinions and telling the operator stories about yc,ur own plant. The purpose of the interview is to obtain his opinions; he probably has little interest in what you do at your plant.
Agreeing too profusely with the operators criticisms of his con-o trol room may have the opposite effect intended; you may appear overly critical and hostile to the operator. Conversely, do not reject any of an operator's coments as insignificant; they should be written down whether you agree with him or not. Doing so also proves your interest in what he has to say and will elicite further responses.
o Team members should not congregate around an interview.
It is a good idea for two people to conduct the interview, but more people tend to make the operator somewhat uncomfortable.
O o
The written questionaires will have been completed and should be reviewed prior to the oral interview. During the interview, insure you understand the operator's responses and obtain sufficient detail.
Remember, the written questionaires are designed to serve only as preliminary answers and topics for discussion.
Explanatory notes and comments should be written directly on the original questionaire, or on a Comment Sheet, if more room is required.
Plan on one to two hours for the oral interview.
o The interviewer should sign his name on the bottom of the first page of the questionaire. This will enable the person writing the summary report to go back and ask questions if he does not understand a written coment.
Ideally, the interview should be conducted in private, adjacent o
to the control room.
In practice, realize you may be interviewing on-shift operators in the control room itself..
O o
Realize that interviews will have to be scheduled in accordance with the availability of operators. They may be spread over several days and on any shift. The survey team will have to adjust its scheduling accordingly.
o Consider background and experience of team members in assigning interviews. One person may prove more adept at this task then another, or may enjoy it more.
O Following the interview, the operator's responses must be summarized on the form supplied as page 12 of the checklists. Take care to do a thorough job here; this will greatly simplify writing the sumary report. Comments should be listed in terms of checklist criteria with specific examples included and cross referenced to the check-list item. Avoid repetitive listings, i.e., although a given problem may be mentioned in several areas of the questionaire, it should be listed in the summary only once. Those items which have no applicable checklist criteria should be listed separately at the end. An example of a completed form is included with this supplement.
2.7 Control Room Review One full week will probably be required to complete all sections of the survey checklists.
Please review the directions on page 15 of the checklist, workshop handout material, and the information in this supplement prior to starting work.
All panels containing controls or displays normally used by the o
operator should be reviewed. This includes back panels and auxiliary panels. A separate checklist (sections A, B, and C) must be com-pleted for each panel.
O,
~
O o
Multi-unit control rooms must be reviewed separately. However, identical panels may simply be cross referenced.
Differences between units must be given separate attention.
o All paperwork should be done in black ink to facilitate copying.
Please write as neatly as possible.
o The person completing a checklist should sign his name on the first page so that questions arising during writing of the Sumary Report may be resolved.
o Degree of compliance should be evaluated as objectively as possible; avoid grading according to what you would like to see changed.
In rating compliance, all panel components pertaining to the item should be considered.
Specific examples of discrepancies should be listed as notes.
O o
Extra effort should be expended to insure that thorough notes are taken.
Even if an item is rated as "mostly compliant", exceptions i
must still be noted, or the evaluation is meaningless when the Sumary Report is being written. If you cannot find any exceptions, then the item should be rated as fully compliant. Complete notes are an essential requirement for writing the report.
o Individual components listed as examples should be named by both function and number to facilitate identification.
o Team size permitting, checklist evaluation should be performed in teams of two, a person with operations experience working with one of engineering background. Operations experience is particularly necessary for sections A, B, and C.
o Where administrative procedures are referenced, document with procedure number and section.
l 0
Note good examples as well as bad relating to checklist criter'ia. _ _ _ _.
o Certain items may serve as keys in identifying panel design problems. Among these are the presence of large numbers of temporary labels, taped on charts and other operator initiated modifications.
Also, deserving particular attention are undifferentialed matrices of controls and displays (see section A3 of the checklists).
o An independent overview evaluation done without the use of check-lists should be perfonned by the human factors consultant and the General Electric representative. These will prove useful later in writing the sumary report.
2.8 Lighting and Sound Surveys Recomended methods for evaluating lighting and noise levels have been modified slightly since the workshop, in accordance with the advice of our human factors consultants.
Permissible lighting levels now fall within a range of 30-50 footcandles, and sound surveys are performed with C-weighting as well as A-weighting.
If participating on the survey team, General Electric Company or f1IT will provide these instruments.
2.9 Photographic Support More extensive photography than initially recomended has proven desirable, including both polaroid and 35m cameras. The polaroid is very useful for taking pictures of specific checklist discrepancies at the time observed, so should be available for day-to-day use by the survey team. Where such an illustration may prova useful, take a photo immediately, write the panel number and checklist item on the back of the photograph, assign a sequential number, enter it in the photo log (page 87 of the survey checklists) and cross reference the photo-graph on the checklist itself. Particular attention should be given to items with evaluation products of 8-12.
A complete set of 35m photographs should be taken at all control panels g,
V for future reference. The author of the Sumary Report may refer to these when questions arise, obviating the need for return to the plant. __
O They should encompass all panel sections, including annunciator windows, and be reproduced as at least 5" X 7" prints, preferably 8" X 10".
In adoition, 35mm photos should be taken of items which may potentially serve as examples in the generic report.
Film type and lens size are not critical, but ASA 400 color negative with a 55mm lens is a good choice. A shorter focal length will encompass more of the panel, but may not allow labels to be read. Whatever the choice, try to frame the photo such that system layouts are not divided down the middle; overlap should be made at logical points on the panel.
2.10 Task Analysis Detailed directions for completing this form have been supplied on page 81 of the checklists.
If additional assistance is required, contact your team leader or General Electric. When developing the form, list only one or two individual tasks per page to allow room V
for writing in comments during perfomance of the walkthroughs.
I 2.11 Emergency Procedure Walkthroughs t
It is important to remember that the purpose of the walkthroughs is not to evaluate the procedure or the operator, but the control room.
i We are trying to determine if the given layout of controls enables the operator to effectively operate the plant in that given situation.
i It should also be remembered that these will be performed as talk-f throughs; the primary source of information is the operator and no attempt is made to evaluate time requirements. The prepared task analysis serves as a guide for the walkthrough sequence.
The number of team members involved in the walkthrough should be limited to two or three: one given primary responsibility for questioning the operator, one taking notes, and one filling in traffic patterns on the Control Room Arrangement. Prior to starting, the purpose and methods of the walkthrough should be discussed in detail with the operator so that he knows what to expect. To start the transient, the operator is provided with the entry conditions as -..
c-given in the prepared scenario. He should then select the correct procedure, and, using this procedure, talk through the transient with the survey team describing his actions, what he looks for, and where problems may arise.
As the scenario progresses, one team member should trace the operator's path on a Control Room Arrangement drawing. Since a talkthrough approach is used, many side trips may be made which would not bc part of the operator's normal response pattern. These should not be repro-duced; only the paths he indicates he would normally take. The operator should also understand that he should react as if the normal contingent of shift personnel is vailable, not as if he were in the control room alone. Consider using a team member to fill in for a second operator.
Another team member should take notes as the discussion is in progress.
These may be made directly on the task analyses form in column five.
Items to look for are listed in the directions for filling out this form (page 81 of the checklists). Most importantly, attention should be given to control / display relationships (their position with respect to each other). Look especially for indications not available in the control room.
Following completion of the walkthrough, review the task analysis and procedure for critical controls and indications. These should be re-evaluated against applicable checklist criteria.
If necessary, the task analysis should be rewritten neatly, incorporating all notes and comments. Results obtained from each walkthrough should be summarized on page 83 of the checklist in a manner similar to the operator inter-view sumary, 2.12 Exit Interview On the final day of the survey, a meeting should be held with the plant management to describe preliminary results of the survey and what will be done next. This should be in the form of oral reports by team members on areas for which they were responsible. Time spent on each section should be limited to a maximum of five minutes, or one hour total. Each team member should outline general areas of discrepancies found by the team during the survey (this will also provide a valuable input into the Plant Sumary Report). A practice runthrough the day before may be beneficial.
2.13 Results Reporting Following completion of the survey, General Electric will consolidate the data into a Plant Summary Report and submit it to the team leader for review. This report will discuss general conclusions drawn in each section of the survey, and provide a complete list of all operator comments and checklist items which the survey team recommends be con-sidered for corrective action.
It should be realized that this list will be in the form of areas of human factors concerns requiring attention, with specific examples provided where possible.
It is not intended to be an all-inclusive list of all components which must be modified to optimize control room design; this must be a more extensive effort which considers all alternatives and requirements. However, it is understood that corrective action for these items will be taken on a control room-wide basis.
When all plant surveys have been completed, a generic report will be compiled, listing concerns found comon to most BWR's to be considered by the Owners' Group for generic action.
Both this report and the Plant Summary Report discussed above may serve as inputs to each utility's plant-specific report to the NPC.
2.14 Control Room Decorum For those team members who have not previously been exposed to a control room environment, some general suggestions on control room decorum may prove useful..
.,,.o,--,.--.
Always request permission to enter the control room, and leave
()
o if requested to do so. Usually either the shift supervisor or the senior operator has authority to grant access. We are under their authority while in the control room and must follow their directions. Observe all required sign-in procedures.
Avoid actually touching control switches or leaning on panels; o
such actions tend to make operators extremely nervous.
It is a good idea to inform the operator you will be looking at his panels when you first enter.
The on-site team member should find out if there are restrictions o
on the number of people allowed in the control room.
If access is limited, cons t der other alternatives available. Some team members may cover operator interviews while others are conducting _
panel reviews, or some members might work on a later shift.
()
o Maintain the noise level as low as possible.
Be careful of distracting operators during shift change, plant o
startup, etc.
o Be careful to observe no smoking areas and other plant regulations.
i S
s.
=
's N
22 l
t'
SURVEY TEAM MEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES TEAM LEADER Schedule survey, coordinate between plant management, on-site team member, survey team, and General Electric Ensure preparations have been completed prior to arrival of the survey team Assign and coordinate survey functions Determine survey sequence Lead exit interview Resolve problems arising in the course of the survey ON-SITE TEAM MEMBER Complete advance survey preparations Coordinate with team leader and plant management in scheduling the survey l
l Ensure plant personnel are cognizant of the survey program Interface with plant management Provide or obtain plant-specific expertise in survey effort Resolve administrative details, such as security access, badging, l
obtaining operators, scheduling interviews and providing secretarial support GENERAL ELECTRIC (optional)
Advise team leader in survey scheduling Assist team leader in resolution of problems Advise team leader in survey methods Provide guidance on scope and intent of the survey l
Collect and maintain survey records Ensure information required for Plant Summary Report is obtained l
Collect data for generic report Prepare Plant Summary Report Assist in performance of the survey O
I --
~
SURVEY TEAM MEMBER RESPONSIBILITIES (continued)
HUMAN FACTORS CONSULTANT Advise team members in human factors considerations relating to checklist items Perfom independent evaluation of the control room Assist in performance of the survey O
O _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
O CONTROL ROOM SURVEY JOB STATUS CHECKSHEET Schedule survey Complete advance preparations Obtain security and radiological clearance Schedule introductory meeting with plant management Review LER's, operator interviews, task analyses, panels to be evaluated and advance preparations Complete LER Analysis fonn Complete operator interviews Complete Control Room Review A
B C
D E
F G
H Panel measurements Lighting survey Sound survey Complete procedure walkthrough Relief valve failure Loss of coolant Loss of feedwater Exit Interview l
m x
=
n o
r-2 g
=
o m
m x
8 5
q m
=
~
0 8
6 E
-=
c r
o E
A R
C 2
=
E r
E m
p E
g w
w c
x x
x Q
8 A
2 8
x e
5 o
Day 1
,e
)%
8%
Day 2 v
Day 3
)
Day 4 ez
-4 x
-4 o
Day 5 r
2m m
r-O w
O Day 6 2
2 m
m C"
Day 7 m
,e Day 8 Day 9
,r Ak Day 10 s,
ok Day 11 as Day 12 Day 13 0
I OPER ATOR INTERVIE*4
SUMMARY
FORM This foru is used by the Interviewer to summarize the information obtained during the Operator Interview. Each entry is to be cross-referenced to the specific checklist item for further evaluation during the Control Room Review.
Item or Area of Concern Checklist Ites(s)
'T",, s.
- o..-,L,,,
4,, L w
..l A07
- t 18e I..< l e..,1 A 3.7 sc 2 9 04 ei te...
r-e c a... t-Le reo,Le}
. 14.
,,, le -
f"I. T e,,
es.s..aa a l a,. -,
)
r...
4 -- s'. e. ls cs My a,,
4, m/.,,
/.2. f, c 1 4....,. l.,,.
U.;
.. /. a :,
Lite.
c t./
Sa '. e -ul. < s sserea)olle G I. 5 our
_ M.,Je s -.1, L
)JC,aalf
(,
o e. a cd e S 5. T B 7. 6 sc o1 RHll
(, If (lu-hs5 s :.Le1
.s laal a le) 9 f*"L.A T.T,A S.tO t../,.
n 2. 3 5,, s.. t,
i,.
,,. u.i 7,..,. _
, L).
.,,,J,j ea....
..).)
wt
,\\i.n w,.
t..)a
,4
, l.. f
,,a. c, 7,......
oc
')).L...I c,,, t.,
,,,. eJ,1 J...,
+..:,... I, O
IV DERGENCY PROCEDURE WALKTHRGJGH TRANSIENT SCENARIO Procedure Selected Qalief Valva Failure SRO Review Include entry conditions, symptoms, transient trends, equipment failures and end points.
During normal operation at 100% power, a single relief valve spuriously actuates. The operator receives the following annunciators:
VALVE LEAK DETECTOR SYSTEM HIGH TEMP ACCOUSTIC MONITOR ACTUATED Valve position lights indicate closed, torus temperature rises until torus cooling is initiated, then stabilizes. Generator load and steam 4
flow decrease slightly, some instability in water level is observed. All attempts to close the valve fail and the reactor must be scranned.
IO O l
IV EMERGENCY PROCEDURE WALKTHRCUGH TRANSIENT SCENARIO Small Break Inside the Procedum Selected ennta inment SRO Revisw Include entry conditions, symptoms, transient trends, equipment failures and end points.
The reactor scrams on high drywell pressure from 100% power.
Besides alarms normal for a scram, the operator receives the following annunciators:
REACTOR LOW LEVEL PRIMARY CONTAINMENT HIGH PRESSURE GROUP ISOLATION ALARMS DRYWELL FLOOR DRAIN TANK HIGH LEVEL Reactor water level continues to decrease slowly until HPCI begins injecting approximately 30 seconds after the scram. HPCI is able to re-store water level unassisted; low-low level is not reached. All systems operate normally.
1 O _ _ _... _ -
IV DERGENCY PROCEDURE WALKTHRGJGN TRANSIENT SCENARIO Procedum Selected Loss of Feedwater SRO Review Include entry conditions, symptoms, transient trends, equipment failures and end points.
While operating at 100% power, all reactor feed pumps trip for unknown reasons (condensate pumps remain running) actuating the RFP TRIP annunciators.
The reactor scrams on low water level providing the expected results of a scram. Water level continues to decrease until HPCI initiates and level is restored.
l l
O
. l
AN 8TATED CHECKLIST b attached copy of the Control Room Survey contains notes and supplementary material on checklist interpretation, applicability, related criteria and survey methods. Where the wording of an item is somewhat abstruse or lengthy, key words have been underlined to identify the most significant concept in the criteria. Please refer also to the directions for advance preparation for additional guidance on asterisked items.
Changes made to the checklist since the workshop are marked with a bar in the margin. Double bars indicate the change was made after the Duane Arnnld survey.
Bars between checklist items signify a deletion. Minor changes in spelling, punctuation and gramer have not been marked.
In addition, to revisions designated by margin bars, several more extensive changes have been made:
o
" Control Room Audit" is now " Control Room Review".
o All references to videotaping have been removed.
o The Control Room Review now includes back panels and auxiliary panels.
It does not include any panels outside of the control room.
o Section C (annunciators) has been extensively modified, o
Items requiring operator input are now identified with asterisks; these should be investigated prior to arrival of the survey team.
o Recommended lighting levels have been revised.
o Sound surveys now utilize both A and C weighting.
HFE participation on all teams is considered highly desirable.
o
i o
General Electric will compile the Plant Sumary Report if i
desired by the utility.
o A photo log has been added.
o The operator interview has been restructured.
l o
The panel measurement drawings have been modified.
(
O l
t l
l l
l 0
O ADDENDUM As a result of discussion held during recent meetings of the Control Room Improvements Comittee of the BWR Owners' Group, a further modifi-cation has been made to emergency procedure walkthrough techniques.
In an attempt to coordinate related tasks of various Owners' Group projects currently in progress, it has been decided to structure the walkthr] ugh around the new symptom-based emergency procedure guidelines now being prepared.
Surveys will now incorporate the following steps:
- 1) A task analysis of the guidelines will be prepared in advance by General Electric. This will be compared with control room design during the survey.
3
- 2) A walkthrough of a sample scenario will be performed, based upon the guidelines.
3)
For comparison, a walkthrough of a small-break LOCA will be performed, using current procedures.
- 4) At the discretion of the survey team and host utility, walkthroughs and task analyses of additional normal, abnormal, or emergency procedures may be performed.
t _.
AN#874TED C tf f c K L is r BWR OWERS GROUP 4
CONTROL ROOM SURVEY PLANT / UNIT:
DATE PE!FORED: PHASE I II III IV SURVEY TEAM EMBERS:
Team Leader-l
(
O OTHER PARTICIPANTS (HFE CONSULTANT, GE A-E, etc.) :
i t
(
i NOTE: CHECKLIST ITEMS FOR WICH ADVAN2 RESEARCH IS NECESSARY HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED WITH AN ASTERISK IN FRONI 0F THE ITEM NUEER.
O Revisiert 1 01/01/81.___ _
~
s CONTROL ROOM SURVEY TABG T CONTENTS I
OPERATOR IN"IERVIEW Discussion 4
Introduction to Questionaire 5
Questimaire 6
Comment Fom 11 Summary Fom 12
(,
II LI NSEE EVElff REPORT ANALYSIS Discussion 13 ERs 14 III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW Discussion 15 Comment Fom 17 A.
PANEL LAYOUT AND DESIGN A1 Anthropcznetrics and control room layout 18 A2 Demarcation lines O
and mimics 18 A3 Control / Display grouping 23 A4 Color codes 25 A5 Labels 25 A6 Temporary modificaticris 29 A7 Traffic patterns and panel arrangement 30 B.
INSTRUPENTATICH AND HARDWARE B1 Controllers 31 B2 Indicators 31 B3 Recorders 34 B4 Indicating lights 37 B5 Switches 38 B6 Dnergency switches 40 k
B7 Key-iock switches 41 C.
A)MINCIATORS C1 Gimuping 42 C2 Window design 42 C3 Vistal alarm 43 C4 Audible alam 44 c5 Acknowledgement 44 C6 Visual alam 45 b
C7 Procedures 46 C8 Maintenance 46 C9 Nuisance alarms 47 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
f.
CONTROL ROOM SURVEY TABE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW (Continued)
D.
COMPUTERS D1 Console 48 D2 Capa bility 48 D3 CRTs 49 D4 Typers 51
(
E.
PROCEDURES 1
El Availability 53 E2 Access and recognition 54 E3 Fomat 55 E4 Content 56 E5 References 60 E6 Revision 61 E7 Logkeeping 62 F.
CONTROL ROOM ENVIRCNENT F1 Commmicatims 64 F2 Auditory displays 65 O
F3 Lighting 66 F4 Heating and ventillation 67 F5 Fire control 67 F6 Ehergency situations 67 F7 General 69 G.
MAINTENANCE AND SURVEILLANCE G1 Operator fmetims 71 G2 Jumpers and lifted leads 71 G3 Permanent modificatims 72 G4 Tags 72 G5 Spare parts 73 G6 Procedures 74 H.
TRAINING AND MANNING H1 Training 76 H2 Control room manning 76 H3 Shift change 77 IV EERCENCY PROCEDURE WALKTHROUGH Diseassion 78 Transient scenario 80 Task analysis instructims 81 O
Task analysis 82 Checklist 83 CONTROL ROOM ARRANCEENT 84 - _ - - - - - - - - - - - -
l
e I OPERATOR INIERVIEW DISCUSSION The purpose of the Operator Interview is to obtain direct operator input to aid in identifying potential or actual deficiencies in the control room layout or design or in operating procedures that result in confusim (mental activities), difficulty (manual activities) or distraction (the environment ).
Using the attached questicriaire, operators are asked to respond in writing based on their operational experience and knowledge of control rooms.
(
Copies of the written responses will be sent to the sevey team for a preliminary review prior to team arrival at the site. Interviewees will retain their copies and review them with a survey team member during a later oral interview. If additional space is needed, the attached Cousient Fom is to be used.
For the interview a representative group of crie-third or more of the operators is selected covering a range of experience, education, ability and physical size. If available, at least two should have a current SRO license and two a current 10 license.
The interviews should be conducted by utility personnel and swvey team members with background or experience in op? rations and engineering or design with a positicri conducive to a free flow of infomaticri. It is O
expected that the oral interview will take one to two hours for each operator with the entire interview taking about one day.
Following the interviews, the survey team will consolidate the infomation obtained and analyze it to help identify specific areas of concern for detailed analysis during the control room review.
V,Je n,le,
,,. 7...I 9.,< d.e
=.r*
6.y yao-no-.
o-Wo Gud pay vn c.
~,6 S Led
[y n
si q a a.
e <}.)}
e...
(,,,lh s e e. n e y dec l-C,lle-c3 der ss o (y IL)
(
n. 6le
<L, U.4
,1,..
L..,.
4,,
<,,,, -,, 6.,.. /
4 b
f4.
Gile.*.. g ayes, alor s :
The,.
e..
s wy.,, l '.,
sa j
o f. r s,.e.
n ey
~<lt s
e n,*s
),y,.l.., y e.,
y, e '. L.
c...h r,,,;<, /
l l
O
~4-
I OPERATOR INTERVIEW 1
INTRODUCTICN TO QUESTIONAIRE a
Job Positim Years Experience Comercial Nuclear Fossil Navy Nuclear Date of first License RO SRO Education / Degrees Age Sex Height Weight
(
In response to a post-TMI 1:RC requirement, your utility, along with other BWR owners, is conducting a control room review to identify and correct design deficiencies in the operator-control room interface to minimize the potential for htaan error. This review is perfonned by a survey team cmposed of representatives of several utilities using checklists prepared by the Centrol Room Improvments Subgmup of the BWR Owners Gmup.
(
You are asked to complete the attached questimaire basing your responses en your operational experience and knowledge of your control com and inter-facing systems. You may complete this questimaire in the control room if you desire but please do so without discussing your detailed responses with other operators completing this strvey. If additimal space is needed, the attached Coment Form is to be used.
Following completien, a strvey team representative will review your responses with you. Upm completion of all interviews, the survey team will consolidate the infomatim obtained and apply it in their evaltation of your control room for compliance with htanan factor engineering principles.
'The biographimi infomation requested above will be used in compiling statistics en operating personnel physical characteristics. Current recommendations for panel design are based largely on data obtained from naasurements of military personnel; there are few statistics presently l
cvailable on, for example, the average height and weight of operators.
This survey provides you with a valtable opportunity for applying your knowledge and experience toward improving operating conditims in both your control rom and future control roca designs. Your honest and forthright
(
opinions are not only welcomed, but needed.
l l
0 l
t cnpc at ut s t oT eras w ww. n v n.Y 6a A frL eca sta sgg teass n e e e n s ue. s o resev
_ ~.
I OPERATOR INTERVIEW QUESTIONAIRE A
Would you recoinnend any changes in the following areas:
A1
. shift coverage i
F t. 7, og g 2.,
n2 3
(
A2 shift turnover H3 A3 training 14 l A4 color coding i
A 3. a,, Ag, A s. 3, B 2.1, 8 2.lti, 5 2.14, 8 f.d, 8 3.80,
6 '). i f, y
B F io, 64.1; C 3.1, c r. f, o y. c,, p g,,o,
G 2 3, G i. 'r r
4 I
A5 control room access F6. I, F 7.1, H 2 3, H 1.;
i l
A6 control panel layout or access l
A's ^ ', ^ 1, h9, f.1, F 1.g l
(
A7 commtnistion systems Ft P s. 7 A8 heating or ventilation f 'I O
' i
I OPERATOR INTERVIEW QUESTIONAIRE A9 lighting or noise levels 63.1, 6 3. l%, D 4, L, F I. lt, F 3. 4,
F 3 5, F 1.4 P 3,l, F 3. 2, F t.1, P 7. 8, F 1. t, H 3,8 A10 special test equisunent
(
.\\
F 7 3, C, 5. 3,
c r, y A11 maintenance or strveillanoe, testing 6 t. l b,
G, M 1. 3 A12 data recording and log entries B1 n, 6 3. IS,
0 3.%,
01.5, D 3. 4,
Oy, G7 0 2 h, G 4 7, G g.:,
G t.%,
G C.f it 5.1, n13 A13 infonnation flow A L.7, A G. 7, EG.2, G g.3, E g.ss A14 turnittre, equi;nnent or workspace A I.3, A s.%, h 7, on, D3.8, E t. S,
E I.7,
F l. s,
F L.i,
' ' s f 7.h, F 7. 5,
F 7. g F 1 1,
& i. 2,
G f.9 A15 computers
(
D A16 other?
A, 6, C,
D, 6,
F, (,, M O. _-_
I OPERATOR INTERVIEW QUESTIONAIRE B
Are any controls difficult to operate?
A ' 's A L a, A1.1, 6 I. I,
01.1, 8 s. s, 6 S. 5,
6 S. T, 8I,
8 f. 7, 8 F.1, 8 s. T,
s 7. 6,
g,1, 3,
p g, y C
Are any controls designed, positimed or labeled in a manner that causes risk of inadvertent operation?
A 2, Ag, A y, A g, g, p g,f, g S, i,
I f. 7, 6 i. V,
8f.9, t
$ f.ld, Ia.I, 96.1 D
Are any recorders or indicators difficult or confusing to 2ad?
S1 f3 E
Am any important indicators located such that they are difficult to see l
during nomal or emergency operatim?
! O A l*l 41.6, A 7, 2, B 2. 2,
8 1.18; y
F Do you feel any control roce displays are unnecessary, provide unimportant infomatim or needlessly clutter the control panels?
G Based on your operational experience, does your control room lack any controls or displays needed in your response to nomal or emergency sit uations?
(
i l
l l
.O _ _ _, -. - _.
I OPERATOR INTERVIEW QUESTIONAIRE H
Do you consider the annunciator system to be effective in conveying important infonnation to you?
(
I Do you have any problems locating or using procedures or operatimal
(
instructions?
E J
Are individual responsibilities and chain-of-command clearly tmderstood during all operating conditions?
Fi 7, Gl, H33 K
Is there an adequate ntanber of operators available in the control room (or O
innediately available) to effectively operate the plant during all conditions ?
L Are you required to perform any duties that you consider tnreasonable or distracting in your responsibility as an SHO or RO?
GI,
H 2.3 M
Based on your operatimal experience, have any errors or incidents occured which could have been averted thmugh improved control roan design?
(
h.
F C
- 0. E,
F, is,14 a
s O
-9
l f
I OPERATOR INTERVIEW I
QUESTIONAIRE N
Have you emperienced any problems using or tmderstanding your procedures?
I 4
(,
P Is there a particular panel which you consider more difficult or confusing to operate than the others?
Q General Comnents:
l O
I l
l
(
O.
l I OPERATOR INTERVIEW COMME!TT FORM This fors is for use by the operator or interviewer for expanded responses to the Operator Interview questions. When used, each response will be identified by item number on this form and also so noted in the space following the applicable question to assure proper cross-referencing.
Item
Response
O E
I OPERATOR INTERVIEW
SUMMARY
FORM ThJ s fom is used by the Interviewer to stanarize the infomation obtained during the Operator Interview. Each entry is to be cross-referenced to the specific checklist item for further evaluation during the Control Hoce Review.
Item or Area of Concern Checklist Item (s)
['
j fO hMf N
e ro,, - reg.e <.2 H-n ee
.a->
a y..,
O
(
O...-,-,.. - - -
I II LIGNSEE EVENT REPORT ANALYSIS DISCUSSION The purpose of the Licensee Event Report (LER) Analysis is to identify plant specific design deficiencies known to have previously contributed to operator errors and to document the need for further evaluaticra during the Control Room Revi ew.
Prior to the arrival of the strwy team, the host utility will review their plant ERs and scram reports from the past two years. Any occurence for which l
operator error was identified as a contributing factor will be listed on the
(
attached ER fom indicating the ER ntaber and a description of the operator error.
The strwy team will then analyze each event to identify possible deficiencies in the htaan engineering design of the control room by cross referencing the corresponding criteria from the Control Room Revist checklists. These items will be included in the detailed evaluation during the Control Room Review.
l O
l l
0. --
l 4
II LIGNSEE EVENT RDORT ANALTSIS LIGNSEE EVENT REPORTS (MRs) e2R NINGER
- 0PERATOR ERROR CHECKLIST IITM
.I a
l l
1 O
I i
i O - -.... - -. -
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW DISCUSSION The purpose of the Control Room Review is to review and assess the adequacy of the arrangement and identification of important controls and displays, the usefullness of audio and visual alarm systems, plant status infomation provided, pmcedures and training with respect to limitatims of existing instrumentatim, infomation recording and recall spability, the control room layout and environment, and other areas of human factor engineering that potentially impact operator effec tiveness. The ultimate objective is to identify potential
(
modifications of the operator-control room interface which will reduce the potential for htaan error.
Each Control Rom Revies is conducted by the sTvey team taing the attached checklists which are titled, in order, ( A) Panel Iayout and Design, (B) Instrtmentatim and Hardware, (C) Anntmeistors, (D)
Computers, (E) Pmeedures, (F) Control Room Environment, (G) Maintenance and Surveillance, and (H) Training and Manning. Checklist (A), (B), and,
,,a f
(C) will be completed for each panel in the control room, including back panels, auxiliary panels and peripheral equipment that contain controls.
and displays nomally operated by the control roce operator. The remaining checklists will be completed only once for each control mom since they are applicable to the entire control rom.
O-In completing the checklists, particular attentim must be given to items identified as a potential problem area in the Operator Interview +
or the LER Analysis to ensre complete coverag'. These items will hav'e-been cross-referenced to the checklist items where applicable.
f'"
s 32pplemental infomation is provided in the workshop to give additional-guidance in completing the checklists.
/
y
~
It is anticipated that perfomance of the Control Room Review will tak,a appmximately one week. Due to the ftmetional approach of the survey,' '
j' in many cases input ficm on-shift operatims personnel will be necessary in evaluation compliance for a given checklist item. In ot her cas es,
j additimal technimi infomatim will be required. Checklist items for which advance research is necessary have been identified with an asterisk in front of the item ntaber. It is expected the host utility
,^
f will compile this infomation prior to the arrival of the survey team 1
and also provide operatims personnel support.
Each checklist item is presented in the form of a question for oonsideratim by a strvey team member. Following that question is a series of numbers in which the specific item being reviewed is evaluat ed. The first set of ntabers (4 3 2 10) indicates the degree of compliance wherein 4 indications no, compliance, 3 indicates smewhat compliance, 2 indiates mestly compliance,1 indicates full compliance and 0 indicates the specific question being considered is not applicable or cannot be considered at this time since the plant being evaluated is O:
not operational. An each specific question is evaluated, the team member (s) acttally doing the evaltatim of that questim indicates the relative degree of complianoe by circlins the applicable ntaber. ___
III C0hTROL ROOM REVIEW
\\
DISCUSSION (Continued)
,/
Following the number indimting the degree of /@mpliance for each item being evaluated is a predeterinined firJmberea$ging fre~n 'hne' to three which indicates the relstive importance of that item with respect to the
~
potential for causing or contributing Koperator. error., A 3 indicat es g potential for opeirai;cs error, 2. indicates moderatelotential and 1
'~/'
inc1 cates low potential. In the final evaluation of each item an.sidered.,it is the product;of the degree or compliance tiites the
?
- phtential for operatee' error that determines if the consideration of k,
f f -cortstive act'iis is' jdstified. Since some items will not be applicable
. ~ -
for consideration in all control rooms, it should, be noted that a general com;nrizotor several control rooms by comparison of "soores" is not valid.
,,;, ~,
/
wi
^
p.
,,, Followirs each check 1Ist item is space for. tie person p$rforming the
/
evalustien to enter connents. For each specific checklist' item, these
-s comme r will' identify items or components of non-compliance, the scope f'
_, [
of review, or any quailfyi.ng statenent judged to-be appmpriate to the e
evaluaticri.' If, -for example, a large ntunber of components are reviewed
/
and only a_ few. are in non-compliance,, these would be specifically noted in the commen, specs and tae general rating would be "montly -
wnpliance". To pmvide additional doctmentation, still photographs will % taken of sijer t; ems or components of non-complia6ce,such as O
mimisisyouts, controVdisplay@upings, isbeling syste':as or,equipnent L
locati'me.y These 'phorbgraphs se cross referanced 'so the specific i
checklist -item by c notatien in the conscent space. Dtuit to the importance of comments in the.evalutt'im, additicrial Counent Fonns will be attached for more detail when necessary.
s o
As an example, a N.vis/ item would possibly be aa follows:
3 l
y
.-u
^
^
y' 2 08 u
e ijc.? : %
tt 8
su
?
' fl.
^
o e R i E e 23 e
El Does the control room operator Compliance have availablei 4 3@ 1 0 r 3 = _ 6, E1.1 a full set of up-to-date Strveillance pmcedures
{
plant procedurer,.
are incomplete and not all are latest revision; j/
~
others are OK l
Since all procedures except.aurW111ance pmcedures are available to the control mom operator and are up,to-date, 2 is circled indicating
[
"mostly" compliance and multiplying that by 3, the potential for error, l
gives a product of 6.
O.-
i s
t 3
s i
a s s ',
III CONTROL ROOM REV. IEW s
I 1
3 L
+
TMENT FORM
' s e
t 9
This form is to be used during the performance of the Control Room Review to identify, for each specific checklist item as necessary, the scope of travie),
items or components of non-compliance, or any qualifying statements
- s i'
^
appropriate to the evaluatice of that checklist item. When this fem is used, '
the checklist item ntaber is to be entered here, and a note is to be nade; in r.
s the space following the checklist ites to identify the use of this commen6 k ' gh,
i' form, assta ing proper cross-refe encing. This form is to be placed in' thei T-I survey package directly following the page on which the checklist item inspears.
,('
(
..\\
Item Ccament 4
7-
?.
5' j
JN
- .y b,l t
?
% \\s.
e
- s..
i 3g 3
l m,
l s '
++
\\.;
t 3
I sji
>. f n E4
\\ \\'
,f c, - ~
- 'f
'i,-(.
r3 4
T.
t
- ,4 y'
4 I
s 4
T
- s
\\
T
- x
' N N
l t s
l t < //
-Y y __
a III - WN7BOL ROOM REVIEW Panel PANEL LAYOy and DESIGN A
e A1 For control panels:
A1.1 does the design' generally meet measurement 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
I,,,,,g,,
g,,,
.. standards per the :nttached anthropometric c
4.i.
f.....
f,,g,,.
diagrams (complete and attach)
%,,a m e.,, a.
e.,b.
M '*****
- d
'"A k 'p *'? -
- 2 fe-esV '*
- I'
- l
- 'A
."L4I*'
k p.,
se g,
rr IT
- f.,. M., e !< - e 4 m.6e 5**
L.,.._f.
t.
r...
...m....,
.,,s..
.....o s.-........._.,,...._,...a,,...-.,
y_
- m. s -..,, s..
s,..,,,.,,
t,.,
A1.2 are they of the same layout and design on 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
multi-mit plants (not mirror image)
At et Co. so-Oc so n. I plan f
?
,!s.
3 I
\\
A1 3 when panel components are pemanently 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
removed, are spaces covered to prevent debris or dust fra entering panel internals and repainted to avoid g -
visual distinctiveness co f o
- L le...
6e,-
reeow*d
,e yg iJ l
v A1. 4 have sharp -corners and edges been 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
eliminated?
?
I
(
Are lines of demarcation, mimics hother A*7 *E O*
' " ' '6 " ' '
A2 graphic displays:
i a c c ef ),6 fe.
A2.1 used to distinguish between comonly shared 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
(-
systems or components in multiple wait control rooc:s v y de-s 1/,. l. (f c, - -. 4 iJe >d sle k.0+3 Is=*
Gel ~a s d.h s la =l fc'**l>
o e.
7 l
A!A C'
s; p '
v.l l
y a.h A2.2 used to enclose related displays 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 :
0,v.ls f a.e ls b
s y,le,
y el,.. -.. s
/,, ao I. -
- 1. a < > ; A 5. I r + b*s Tl..
, e y,-. < -+
A se p
i o-i Q
S*
ea pe e l.
ti.e,,els.,
WA if sehl<l
)s s j, $-y >8-s y,le m no c'
01 one 7
-1 See al+c A 1.11, A 1. 'y 5
i i
x
l III Control Room Review I
A PANEL LAYOUT and DESIGN (Continued)
(A1.1) Anthropometric Diagram p
a
/
/
\\
\\
e C
\\
[
\\
hsight
(
/
\\
/
a i
J L
^
display hei ht
~
(min / max a
C control height (min / max) c.-- e (, :
T* % l.< l~
A c* bh f
Lu.!..
s., J ;.J.,'.6 u,,,w
.A,J A
- 1. d.
T p.
k ca be f l]is pl,
o y
o.h.)e A l'.
\\ h I
~
limits measurement dimension coments
(
min.
- max, min.
max.
f a
a 60
!;.w x, b
L8 68
[7.'.[..,",'j,','i,'.
88 c
~
~
.... 't. l.
-.. la - >
a..
u y
t
-9g-
III Control Room Review O
A PANEL LAYOUT and DESIGN (Continued)
CONSOLE / DESK MEASUREMENT (A1.1) Anthropometric Diagram PANEL p
r--
/
I i
k d
y
' depth l
a i
f I
a control height (min / max)
S l
1 n
J l
O
?
b see-over height
[
l f
knee space foot space
_ u e
r ir ir n
(
c a
leg space limits measurement dimension
- "'"t' min.
max.
min.
max.
a 25 Sh b
h2 c
2h 25 d
e b
t 25 III Control Rocn Review A PANEL LAYOUT and DESIGN (Continued)
BENCHBOARD MEAStrdEMENT
( A1.1) Anthrepometric Diagram PANEL A
s' l\\
e annunciator height g
\\
/
s Jh D
a control height l
4
(" "! " }
de th l
b l
display hei ht (min / max
^
l l
limits measurement
,g nin.
max.
- min, max.
a 30 60
(
b 30 68 f
e 6
28 d
88 e
~~
~
~~
O'
'l
~
1%
+
c e
foot space
,g,
/
l III (I)NTROL ROOM REVIEW O
Panel W
PANEL LAYOUT and DESIGN (Continued)
.s A2.3 used to separate similar subgmups of 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
components within system groupings MA of
.mek n o sakrnys y
laa t s e.n. A. J 6
<<c.<=
o,t,...) /s m 1. s. I. h.,.
.a l s 9.,
g.
G.
)... t...y v.I-<s G ~ # s e -*I l y.F A
<* l* - s a l s f> * ~
F<ed f-3.
p-ps p.
fe.
.1,.
(
A2.4 used to distinau h between primary and 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
secondary flaw mths yfsss fis-ye ti.s St Gcc$
, y, la n,
e,3
,' 3 aa 4 ; o.,
., J b
yg
- (-
y<..~.**y lseco.<)a y fla-ps H.s
,o A2.5 visually distinctive between each other 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
and panel / background vsek Wh if ec l.e**
are A2.6 pennanent and maintained 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
A/A
.- Q-j,,,,
og u,,)
A2.7 laid-out so that flow paths and arrangenents 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
are orderly and easily recognized de-enwk..a*
Af f ) 'a s ed.*l
-fo
- e.. ~ < s, 6, f ",,,,.,3,, ),
off
.c, 1
L y
pA ib no l.**s v., ed
(
5,.
. l..
A'M A2.8 identical in lay-out for repetitive 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
groupings of components E a <A ra L,y s 1a la.y e A s k s., Ll 6a st}e.,{.<.I ( a - a.d
> --{. ' y) e.e<s<
<..).
Le n.
ca.*
,p y
1007,,
ev H.
rec;rc lo >f s v4 if
.o s.,,
g,,)
t-Nh ih ne e f*fe
} s ** f'* *y I
li ~f'J
'"1 * ~ i h
[
Aft
I*
" ' " ' l0' # * " L' '
I'
I
(
4/J,,,,.J A 1.!, A 7 2
.- l l yed ca
.F 6.,
bl.')*
- 6
}e (;* ; S,'a s'.as y e
- e.. e. e a
7
- - = y.I t%eae n.i,1 La ko s e p o..> l e la y.:d s
- r. ; < < o.
' *' * *y
- 3 k
ev.,f
a III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW A
PANEL LAY 0tJT and DESIGN (Continued)
A2.9 clearly marked with arrows to show 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 z directicr1 of " flow" krA th I..,
as J no Ath il Clue c).reck.
( *.')-
eleele:'~I a % I' * )
es I
A2.10 identified with starting and end points 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
- 4
'0 no i:
,s used 54,,1. ) /, J yo: ls
/.9
<l*< l< < d
' m 5) uA rF A2.11 used to integrate switches, ptanps, mLnual 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
and remotely-operated valves, isolaticzi paths, etc.
TLo *
> l.. Al or$a'.**I I*yaal e * ( *. r.' Is n 's kl*A in K*
A,e a tt
" e s k " r e - do., f p lea-J ite - >
La a,
co go-o f> y ve- >. al pa '*l
+ ** lN ' -
Tk;.
,.< L ),
o 5,.
.l.,
A 2. 41 A2.12
. consistent in the application of symbols 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
for p2mps, valves and other process y,,, g,,
,,,,,,l.,,)
t,, 3 g,
7,,.,/
elements (describe *on Coment ForTL and
,,j,; g
- ti,.
- p..1 3 attach)?
yeay..e ey
$.I,
,,,,l yn.4 l
no A,k.
.1
- 4.,
c..... J -.7 w l. J..
f <*<*I; dc<*
r e:f ' ' '
7 oy s p r e'. k.
,y bet tLs h ed u m A3 For controls and displays:
. ).,. f. 3 1. )l b, mele, reco</**3
- li<< I*
- l 2
p.p y l
A3.1 are they generally zmpoed by system 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
(with identical lay-out for repetitive groups)
Att co - p. a. ),
.4.
sy,le,, l.. JJ 6,
b,N-y g
sd,y. lo-
.yo.p;..y 5%,.t) 6.
,Ja l...s (na s
.y 2 )
.~.<<s' A19 r e g i. on
.fr S:.sl
.v t e s
.y.f ra ) A L 2, A 1.
- *V<
- o e -lc ' ' >
Tkt.
41
<< p..<<>
$ < a., p.-)
f o
7,
.. n. e
.y..f s A3.2 is orderine for components of similar 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
ft:1cticri consistently from left-to-right or top-to-bottom con neet :
- vcoarser.
A-B-
C (5 - c - A i
2 2 5
3 1
1L
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW Panel PANEL LAYOITT and DESIGN (Continued)
A3.3 are grcupings arranged in ftmetional or_
4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
sequential relatimships S'.o. \\.. a a \\ -
\\ \\ pseys yssy*] lo 3
- U **, ar lI J. e l... p v.:.lv es,., l l 1., L a o. l, g lg.,
tiia ef,-.f.
w eslJ se,-<J..I 7 6, ej i.
o,Jer use ti.e.-
a,
{-
A3.4 when strings (6 or more) or _ matrices 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
'(greater than 4x4) of components of similar
- 4 or cocum functim are installed, are they ha7 I ' 7 '
- '"7b'"Id vistally distinguishable by lines-of-(*
r o d ' a I
- 1 denarcation, hierarchical labeling, color g
,,p
.,,) /J.v.Jel contrast, spacing, shape, etc.
,,4 g,,,
,, tt.Js j
-. b.. <.
,Y yA
, t..p c,
u 0*
re - Ir. a a I.v -
- 'y a
5,e 1, o A
.1. "1, 4 2.12, A 3.1, A 5'. 7
, ;., g,
J, y, j ;y up s,
.,, u.. >...-
A3.5 are coding methodA as used for item 3.4 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
consistently applied (list m Comment
. J.3
<tkels viel Fonn and attach) y4 c6 o
~,
.. u..
u
..l.. u.,.
..s..,
. a s ~.
Saa. t..
A n,.1
[.e co t. -
. ),,..)
ca s:sle-c7, B S.t o C. -
s \\,.p e a J..,
A3.6 are they generally located in zone 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
"a" or "b" m the anthropometric diagram (see A1.1)
R, (,,
4 p...!
,. c. s s i a = f d r..-. a p 5.,,
.l..
43.1, 91.1, B 2. "J, 8 'i. Ur, a f. T, 8 6 3 1
l A3 7 are control cociponents located within an 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
arms reach of feedtack indimtims?
(
LL C.,
,11.,. 4....
~J b.
sI..l.J J.. h g,
r a
g,... I,
J.,,.L..y g....-. / Fl.- /v r.
o*
o~
t.
< o h=l
..K.<
.I y,a, J i.
i
- ~ ~
a<
a,,
opa.[ <
sy m.,
J 6a
,aessa.y l O -_
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW A
PANEL LAYOUT and DESIGN (Continued)
A4 For color use:
h4.1 is there a plant standard 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
(complete attached list)
,, H.,
, )-.. ),, J e v.. >..... I<. h p s.- a H. b li el Co m g
A4.2 is selected use of colors consistently 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
applied for alarm prioritizaticri, indicating lights, la bels, lines-of-demarcation, legend i,.. t.. 03.sv plates, graphic displays, indicating devices,
tags, et c.
"// j A g.t
,, k.,
.(
.l../..)
- e... l. ; 4 9. 2
..L.
A d
'#"# " N/
I' sL..AJ sa
- c...'. t e,f
- H.
- -
p..el a.)
th o H e-y * - * **
l A4.3 when there is a possible dual meaning for 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
I colors, is t!re e an adc'iticrial indicatim for visual distinction?
),,)
b.e-4 t u y a., >.
,Lo..
y a r.
t.3 yr.e ca
,,,a,,,,
7,,
C.,
h;le ad
.. 4.,
13 64,
.ll.p e l
use.
A5 Are labels, legend plates and escutcheons:
A5.1 used to identify component ftmetion 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
<* ye h
talaled ?
Ass att h5.2 used to identify operational limits 4 3 2 1 ox 3 =
l or warnings l
(
- t. a. t e,y ea; ll Co -
oyos k
.a ))ilo o ->
y
)
of.-.le-
. f. 0 c.,
,,f,,,, J
<. k...
n.t
,... +,...,,,....i
-e s.u.. a s...
..e s.
... u..., n......
... n. ui.,,.i.y
- r.,....,
u,,,
,. n, c,
~. > a n...
..c... ~ i., u he.,
, le o. l.l be o,. te) v.o l
w c o - p..<. F la t el. ;
A s,,
$ 5. 2 C.,
,..L p..,, L.. g,5,g,
cy p,,,
p p.,.
a...... 8..
l. L.l>
1.-
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW A
PANEL LAYOUT and DESIGN (Continued)
( A4.1) To evaluate the consistency of the applicaticr1 of color standards in the control roan, complete the following for each meaning:
Color Meaning Valve Open Valve Closed Breaker Open Breaker Closed k
Mid or Transitional Position On or Operating Off or Not Operating Start Sto p Danger or Warning Caution, Trouble or Pre-Trip Trip or Failure Autcmatic Operation or Control Manual Operation or Ccritrol Limit Condition General Status Hot Cold Other (specify)
CRTs Alpha-Ntmeric Identification Process Variable (in limits)
Process Variable (out of limits)
Process Diagram lines and Symbols Reference or Scale Markings Other (specify)..-.. _
3 III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW Panel PANEL LAYOITT and DESIGN (Continued)
AS.3 used to identify system designation 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
5, m m., 7 f.LcI>
Co<
p.. Is AS.4 used to identify panel by ntmber and 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
ftriction
(
S v e..,
jal l.
(.
- p.,,, L AS.5 consistent in nmenclature. use o 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
acronyms, abbreviatims, etc.
is on Comnent Fom and attach)
L.sb ea \\y
)e s e re g u eir s, to 9 o f VM ff f 0lI'? l YM f L -.o k Co
- d.4e<* I a bbre v afie-s Co
- 6e se-s sy, Tr~ be y o ed a,e AS. 6 consistent in type style _ and the 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
applicatim of type size (ie, larger letters in headings, all letters same height, etc.)
AS. 7 size coded _in a hierarchical system 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
H.**a ci... l e y,lo-
- latel,
.y a ).. I,1.
>. se 4.
help o.p
.% e v.a.
r==els.
Sa
.y De lels la y s f, C, st a o) sy s m alle.
la Le l, Ces a a,.
my e-o.4 saby e.j s, 1 s.,a lle r far
. ).v.)-el co y *
- ~Is co t o..,,
rey. ba h. a talal, s b a.U 4-be ~ 'o *J Ces enfut*J
(*~f"'"l'
(
fe a a t,.
A 3. S AS. 8 visually distinctive (light letters on 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
dark background or dark letters en light backgmund) y *S*
l I
Le l=l*I Tl...
I*
h IeDer13,
A S.t1
- yy. ->
af p..,
O _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _._
O III CONTROL ROOM REITIEW O
Panel V
1 PANEL LAY 0tTT and DESIGN (Continued)
AS. 9 easily read when stationed at the panel 4 3 2 1 0 xT=
(see A1.1)
(at 1T ")
\\
L.,3 4 e..,
Ale t-e 6, c., < 7
,./
6 e l'h e-cu. pe c l>
7
.ib o 5 F, $,
8 9. II
(
- 5.10 auccinctly worded and accurate with respect 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
to rmeticn Sr input signal A'r els og * *. %*
my*\\
%, th e.V b e.
1.
tem
- s = f >*ce l e.l l
s k.,M L.f
. f-ell
,, c = l ; ib
^<* ia3
- Le U k*
elea-
,.7 y
s,.
t, E 7 3, 0 5.1 AS.11 consistentiv positiened above or below 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
devices and readily associated with corresponding controls and displays el.ys Gela-relat<J c.-fc
- ,k
/>l-.7,
.s...
a, Isil k w l. ic lc Asso a,k,
" r ea);I, a < s o a,'. V e2 ~
i. e.
c a.,
ye-ay y. e s 'l
[ D* p '**>
\\
<*~y e s ~4 i-a r,a friv ft,
la s<(
l aJe.gvate e y a a..y pemanent but replaceable )
AS.12 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
S.
al,.
A s.I
% * \\d h=~e e.s.,ra.)
labol pla4e, 6A w,K yn.,.a, fo r eLa y*
(scre-ed fo j a. of r e fie.
ti.
t.'v e l o.1)
AS.13 conspicuous and visually distinctive from 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
the panel background Th.s a y y l. es k
lafel l
i p ate 3 A K.S
<fy.es k
le U * *.%
(
AS.14 oriented to read from lef t-to-right?
4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
N'
- 7
vet tk.,
my a e; LhOL$
L A
8
,, b 64@
L O
e.
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW O,/
Panel A
PANEL LAYOITT and DESIGN (Continued)
L'
'" *I l"Y '
I 1
TJ...
r#
=' t A6 When jemporary changes or modificatims g,,,
c, g g,, g,,.... J
,,J.f.c.f..->
are made, are they:
get VA
.G sto e e y<<+cah A6.1 minimized 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
l os.....
,,. s..
.t a.u.r,...
p... t, a-l
(
S..
1, o A 5.11 I
i h6.2 controlled in application (for infomation 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
l or status, corrective or cautimary purpme only) p admin p.o < a)e r e y
6.3 consistent and controlled in nemenclature, 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
l tmt and color
/
ca. bellJ s)e. -
(* es e0m 7
A,.
. 11 la6.I leyes pe
+a e
cols < l Su a e s **e !
hk6.4 accurate with respect to use or design intent 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
a.,.....
.,... ta.
,a,a l
- 6. 5 incorporated into pmcedures (if infomative, 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
l cautimary or corrective )
o2)-a-co d.'[to e usle-
~L.A
- *
- b' ' ~ ~ b Fa.- esa p \\*
- ~
a-
- 9.,g d'
ca f.caf,**-s r e selle' 3 l' ~
6 i.u.s.>e, o.*
l*
v**
.y y.o c o) v.*
wil L.
TU.
,a le s 4 a.
,La.V k
a l
A6.6 applied to not otscure adjacent er backgmund 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
l informatim or colors 1 l 1
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW A
PANEL LAYOITT and DESIGN (Continued) h6. 7 reviewed periodically _ and made pemanent 4 3 2 1 6-2 =
x or removed?
By adm.,
p r es e]v e s 5<.
,ls o E s.lo A7 From the operator's primary control area:
[dy,<a ha <'s Mesb A7.1 is the path to the control panel unobstructed 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
Ck cal f.,
6ec h c a,,g c rt T ',
J,,
,,,,,l
, 4 ( c,
, c a. 7 A7.2 are control surfaces visible 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
0 A7.3 are annunciator windows visible and 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
identifiable 5-al..
c 2,3 a (a v.o,,.1,1.'s )
A t,~ a
.k !
W&
C.,
trasLf. h l
(
O _ _ _.
II CONTROL ROOM REVIEW B
INSTRUElfrATIGi and HARDWARE B1 Are controllers that require manual operaticrt:
easily reachedhe A3.h B1.1 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
h/ ft:.
. }i,,po. e k< -
g,.J,. l....
f,.
3 i. :
(
1.2 designed to facilitate precise control where 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
fine adjustments are required g,,,, j,, y,,,,,.
f r*aN-e.g.\\
rey **ef fees.s.o.
r eg e.* ed O
0 sv A,- (
q.re.s-ca.b.I
- g***d
' ' ',', l e = =
- Ro i I
c. k.s / o.,f.,
es he B1.3 marked to clearly show manual or 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
automatic mode O
1.4 pmvided with mechanical stops _ at the 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
beginning and end of travel O ** ),<
o y.1 reye.or) f B1. 5 provided with space for hand support?
4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
AJg.J.
7...
L.
7, l.
-. M..I
, t<,6,...,
C..
, H..
e c. L.is I
A,.pl...
t.
he< a. t.I w k <>
[ " r5 e le v v ';
r e t o l* ** 6"!"* b 'l **
O3)
B2 Are indisting devices:
B2.1 marked t_o show normal or abnormal, safe or 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
unsafe, or expected or unexpected g of operation gere applicabl-3
,.).<.l.
3 no.k, o-M *7
- 8..
c.Iaa eoJ-J, f,fal,, y. a l, e A S. R u,.
u...
.,,,.., o....,.....
,,,....,....u.
.,... u.
.-1.>
Sr
- s 3. W (a,
r e c o. cl e < >
_31-
h III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW Panel B
INSTRUPENTATICN and HARDWARE (Continued)
B2.2 free from glare and parallax when 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
staticned at the panel (see A1.1) (.st "L T )
c.a..ja-t,, tt yas.{.*-
a-J I.f;-). %.e als o F12 S 3. l 4 ayy.*s recoa)*-2 l
(
.3 scaled in process uaits that relate to 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
system operaticn O,. a l.
..g.I r e3.;. a,)
y b'
i n.l
,l.. 11
(,4 J.<,. fl g,,. I,1.
., : 6, I v,.
H.
y c u,,,,,,,.,
,,..~,r...,. a
+,. i.
,,. a, y,..
3.-
7,lle,.
i t.. f 9..,.
l J
,(
g,,,l
,,,; g, 4,, j,
, r,,
Ev..-p e :
B2.4 provided with visual contrast or distinctive-4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
ness between smle craduaticms_, process tnits,
ntanerals, background and pointer Se a. t <.
a < L'. 3 s aJ yet.,4,-
, L a.ld lo.
ea d l
.s.,elle y
a 1.Is
.. J.
....l.,,
I,. t I
L
,,L,.
c..
,yy...
B2.5 designed so that pointers do not obscure _
4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
graduaticn marks, numerals or process inits M.. L. n,
.)
s.r~b..,
., k.l2 6.
M s.h A
H.<
u-l..
h.
sypos.f.
K.
p o r, l*
- so A.F K7
,, 11.
o f le ca <-sJ as
- e.. v
- s. fir a c, a..le a
,,s,<4e-.,
n*~ l* s sS.*.lA lo e he f* :< l*-
44 8
a.4,.-le.
B2.6 designed so that pointers move from bottom-4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
to-top, left-to-right or clockwise, depending cn the display design and orientation T f. g
+
m
(
l..g.....(
g 7
per i i ij i e i i_
.7 designed so that indicator direction follows 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
control movement j-rs,see.~4 J)
A.k o g. * $e
- ls
.)o h
).,orrya-e.,s n, c,.
4.
A., / 4 4,._l f.,,
c, <,, f. e,
1,.
l..,
8 S.1
( fy...
I k*
l 5
.!.L.
a l.., ;
H..,
f r. *'
... u /.-J.<
l.,
c., l,.. l...,
< < a a a"
...,,.ar Qwo y el; 7
7 f
b h 3
- - y m
O
\\
s I
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW B
INSTRUENTATIOl and HARDWARE (Continued)
.8 easily correlated with backup indications, 4 3 2 1 0 xT=
especially tnose imtements with elevated O p e r al.,
- i. p. l-n ee rs s e ry
<
- b ' * ** ' ' ' >
f==y.-
n /a le.
I,., l,
. M.
ds(4, f l
se o
' m -aI+
N
- Y ..in~*"'
T-*
p es,...
. ),ee l sa-s,
o.e s< l*)
- b. l* 7 e a /* < = l e s - >
(
MA
.I a.
B2.9 aligned between pointer or moveable indicator 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
and scale without need for vistal l
e xtra Dolation ps,stle A
s it G.I-a,
p a.,te, a-1
~, L.,
a, a
,y...
- k6
- '
- Y l
B2.10 visually aligned _ and provided with identir.=1 4 3 2 1 0 xT=
scales to facilitate comparative reading in groups of similar displays o.,.t/
b
. 6 r, J.
-. L.
<,-r -al.-=
read y.
ly a
a l
+\\,.a, e. }- 6 co y..<J
,1. 1/
t e<.p.:
(.a a yy a -y.
O a ll 6,
4.y v n e, a/
6,,,
sa,
se.,le h.11 marked with subdivisions that are consistent 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
with the accuracy needed by the operator v 7,,, L.-
s 7.,f rey ers/
I'. - p e pef se al* /
fo%
, c,,,., k
, { of,,. L r.,)
,,,)
l b
a c < <, f I */,,
B2.12 scaled with a maxistan of nine intennediate 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
graduaticr.s between numbered markings
(
B2.13 scaled with subdivisions in decimal multiples 4 3 2 1 0 x 1 of 1, 2 or 5.
III CO!C'ROL ROOM REVIEW y
Panel B
INSTRUPENTATICN and HARDWARE (Contintad)
B2.14 marked or color coded to provide visual 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
distinctiveness _ between the case, panel or similiar components
- a sy to sp e F M a h-e-J ba Ayp
.e, 4
ca s. $
0 2.}
ey p
.e, k
s e., les a.J p... G.,
l l
(
B2.15 marked with ntmerals oriented in an 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
upright oositicn c o n n e c t *.
i* ** **
s e.
.o y.--
_-. _ ~
ucecaeet:
7.
g e
r
~
s, h.16 maintained, calibrated and surveillance 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
tested on a regular basis c o k. sI-.1 b,
a ).-
7..c,.). <
C h.17 designed so that a failure mode is evident-4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
o,... i..
/ e,......,
.., a n.
_a a y... k.
s.-
(
s ).a.l..
C.. l.1 '.
- 51... u C.. I
, g..
L 1, I,,,
9 a-
,,.m ;
B2.18 marked or color coded to differentiate _
4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
vfy.C between smles on multiple range meters?
-. I V r*
- v *
- I '
C. ~l C. ~
., u g.,
s y,
,1,.,
a. g,,,,,5
,,,,,).., l y.- not p-.L.iti I
., p.
8,
< J. I a.< - ) 5,.
83.9, a i.tc C. - i << a
- n.-r..y
, t.....
G. s.
scal.
s L..Il be e,te s
..)<J
..J
...;l c o a,e ta l.)
v.' H t%
y eo.* *sf a >IEn se (o.kr wa fet, f a A I's B3 For recorder charts:
B3.1 are printed values easily read and 4 3 2 1- 0 xT=
distinguishable i
a c u..!. -,
pp e s %. I t.y,.. l a r e :.-).. s.,
s,.
y s. 9
(,.
p e.,
A
?
Lad Co.
ya. h y w k.I.,
,A
,naa, u s e, lay y. 9 n l. >
~u
..,l k y..J ree c.) n pp,C
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW Panel O
VB INSTRUENTATICN and HARDWARE (Continued) 4 B3 2 are printing devices pmperly aligned such 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
that printed value corresponds to scale value
ad *)
t )...ke-
+ < l e..J cl=< f 5 < ale d*4 sla-h*
8*~*
(
B3 3 is the alaru point identitled 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
s e l, e ks.f
., % haLa) la b e I payer on as er B3.4 is there adequate distinction for markings 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
on multi-pen recorders i
C--
.-)..)
1 k.a.s be Ce ll.. l e-hs c l< o l '.
5,.
s 3.i
- f..
,.. I L. f... F reee.J.-,
O h35 where fast tracking rates or trends are 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
periodically required, _is there Hi/Lo speed capability e
.J a v l by. E,c e./..,
A g..,
L.,
f, l
.. a...
,., :. a
.,... t. -
., a.
t...
.t, n.,
-.a 5, r...a 9
>- 3 n..
a...
s.,,,
.5
.,:, i.6.-
B3.6 is point select capability available on 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
multi-point recorders
(
B3 7 is recorder clearly marked indicating proper 4 3 2 1 {x 1
=
type and size of chart paper 0 __
I III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW Panel B
HSTRUElfrATICN and HARDWARE (Continued)
B3 8 is paper replaceable wittmut physically 4 3 2 1 0 x T~ =
disconnecting wiring or linlage A,9..,,,
of,. Io-i.yvI i
Se.
.l., a r.g
(
h3. 9 can the ink supply be maintained without 4 3 2 1 0 x 1 =
disconnecting wiring or linkage t ey. <.
a y... l. a e y. l-B310 are pen colors consistent from one recorder 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
to another and/or is the color associaticri unambigmus_ and clearly displayed 9 *-b l l>
s a. l.
e.,.l co r r*le L*d co # * *
- l f*~'L'
A y
e,
<<J
. I 7,
cl.
..l A,
s ta.L e t...et 6T O
s e. le aJ blael ic + *- ?
I.
er) ak y >
m 7 7..
y h3.11 does chart ; aper not bind, eliminating 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
frequent manual correcticris R e 3..< *
- af < < a l* -s p.)
h3.12 are charts marked periodically (at least 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
once per shif t) and when chart speed is changed with date, time and initials to aid in data recovery y<oco)**e
{
0, a.f..
.t*,
e 7.1
'B3.13 has administrative procedure been established 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
for chart marking and used chart / record retention 0 _ _.-
f III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW Panel B
INSTRUPENTAT.IQi and HARDWARE (Continued)
B3 14 are they _f_ree from glare and parallax _when 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
statiated at the panel (see A1.1) 5, go.am e.I<,
v =/,,
B 2.1.
(
B3.15 are they marked to show nomal or abnomal, 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
safe or unsafe, or expected or unexpected y of operation where applicable?
r Se=
en - *,is v -)..
8 3. }
B4 For indiating lights:
B4.1 does intensity pmvide _ adequate _ visual 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
distinction between lit and extinguished lights y.-
t att.C.
It,1, y d43 c-a.
a, An.kJ 6
- 4..L, #
130. 3 i < -, t>
7 h4.2 does the use of lit indicating lights 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
consistently indicate a Dositive state or positive response (an unlighted condition only indiates " power off")
E s f. 3.. L,.(
- l. 7413
,L.,ld
.f 6.
- /
6.
7,..).
, C. < -e la 4 f's..
ar e-e e ll y
p,
- a l.* J*s t% e vs
- 4 ei s e I:y cl <
ess pl C. * " f c '- * * * * "
l l
Qrgv. ors ey ee. La /eyoree Iyd B4.3 is the size and intensity of alam lights 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
adequate to command attenticri A.
6,7 63 e..) &
a/
6,.ykf ewo yk3
(
or y e -).
vy.
6-a L)<.>.. J, s.a e ra -).*3,,
y o.. ).., -e. J I.f h 3 Ir-eI h4.4 is there a positive means of diagnosing 4 3 2 1 0 xT=
failed indicating lights it,y- <.
o7,,. L., /, 3.,,.
, f.)
hik< *I.v*.
T,.1-6., 4.,
O u"
T< ll - his e v e r* ~ f L. s gsF l-y -
.t *jf
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW Panel INSTRUPENTATIOi and HARDWARE (Continued) i h4.5 is bulb replacement easily and safely 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
perfomed O <. le r A
e oy.,. a *./
y ey c I. e. L A U<,*af bges v o l..
p... li., 8 E P ,
f., il < -
of., fL-j, p.,, l. 6. 4 - =,. 4.
at,, G r. g B4.6 are sets of lights in alignment to facilitate 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
(
oomparison between related system elements gg i
E,.. p,, t All A FA mi n; i.)(p, l;-,
- f. ti <**. J. p.y yaart) l A,lJ<l
.,. l..
p., L.
h W 3
g,,,..... L 7.>
- v. t.,
.,, & p.. 1,.,.,., a n.
Ie 4 layo A h4.7 is direct indicatim used in preference to 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
implied indistim that a functim has been perfomed l
L.94>
, G.8)
,.,).,,5 <
H.
,,$,,)
4y,(en e a. ). [ * * *, ee n b ce b =$
s ny ~l Hs v s.r a t Jo s e <<p sy
(
- sy. rel.*$ vs Ivr s=l.cbc '- )
Sete.:)
.o.l.*s a,<
C r-* G
- n y.h
,*g
.ae) y
- 4. 8 when direct indicatim is not practical,,tg 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
there backup instrtmentaticrt to indicate that a ftrictim has occurred?
A g. *.,
le
,1,
.), L I,*l
,.I i,;y 4<<<f 11 4. 7 l
o.
IJA. 6
. ),,,J o.).< a f
- n a
e y... l.,
o g.t
<<g.*J B5 For switches: (g,,,,,r)
,,,.y.7
,,, L f,., 4 s. g, f,,(
, _ t t,, L,,
67}
B5.1 do handles move consistently in the same 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
direction in accordance with expectations (i.e., right for on or start; left for off Se-
'~o " b ' b ' /,
hodesh b-or stop; eenter for tripped, standby, or c o..<, h.,
nomal; pull-to-lock, etc) 1,e 62.7 B5.2 is each positien clearly marked-4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
fe e-alse
,t r.to, E 1.3 0 t
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW B
INSTRUENTATICN and HAPDWARE (Continued)
B5 3 is each reachtble at a nomal operating 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
distance i,*
I,
- A t. I, 41.6, 8 d.3
- *y a n.F s f.r, 6 f.7, g S.g, 3 S.y
(
B5.4 are handles that are located near the edge 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
of the control panels trotected with a guard _
to prevent inadvertent operation 1
l h5.5 do handles require nomal hand pressure 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
to operate (i.e. no thumb-busters )
Op r a. he o f al r<ge.<*)
l A4 a y Le vel.4,1 k
B93 B5. 6 are handles durable and of adequate size 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
l
- BS. 7 is switching action, responsive and precise 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
9 e.*VL *-
(* *
- , b Cl Ses
,Iey 3 s L ld k <,. a de(,, G Je la.,ls naa 5,,. l..
s i.3 l
5..
e 7. c c..
L,7L,6
... l< l.,
l Op... l..
s.yJ vagu.ao)
B5.8 are associated displays, indicating lights, 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
r l
and labels free from visual obstructinby l
hand or am when the switch is operated n../
,1... U
,,f
& l.,a u < p <, L l
5,,
ot..
A S g, 3 S.9, 6f.3 O
I 1 l
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW Panel B
INSTRUENTATI(N and HARDidARE (Continued)
B5. 9 is there adequate hand space between them 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
l'.
q,..o aa s.Jo. h \\
ast.te.-
i
, );,,,,4
,,. }. s t, a
~ 4 - 5 ,,. k.
5.,.. L.,
Sr*
.t.
8 S. %, g 4.1.
I B5.10 is physical /_ distinction omvided between 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
pumps, valves, indicating ligits, divisiatal separation, power source, etc.
R e ta.,
- i. s. >. s i...JI.
c.Ja s : sk.ya
< *J.
s.
..h..l.
C.L..,p.y ct, tS e t+3=
.s ee.1 i.,. F. ;
c.f.,
e.J.
4.,
/.,.l,
,y.6, f..L
- 6. tJ...
4L..lJ 6.
J.,L.
3.,,,L,a 4.
3.3hb ossof.lf colo.
f Nose :
n.
f*ree-e.
.A
).44,s.t s.Lef.
L l
y y.. ale..,
.t opy a
B5.11 are handles or knobs shaped so as to clearly 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
indicate positimi without obstruction of legends or confusion of direction?
f<.
abo d 5 3, p c.q B6 Are switches for emergency or atriorinal use (such as turbine trip, scram, emergency trip, etc.):
B6.1 clearly marked 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
D.J.a.f.s
- 1. L. I. 3,
c.f...J seJ,,. 4.44 6
< cl
- 1..,, *I*
7 B6.2 protected from inadvertent operation 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
{
Mio L*1 i
8 S. <1 y
y gs.. 4.., c e v,,
L.,1,< l., L,7,. I,
8 B6.3 readily accessible 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
A cc,..Lt.
p,. )..
(,,,
o f,.
A3.t, Fr.1,m.i)
Pett.J sal C.,
s t.1 s G t)
.+
p,*., F,, n a ).. L.
op.n i;,
40-
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW Panel B
INSTRU!E!CATICN and HARDWARE (Continued) fB6.4 controlled by sp'cific procedural 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
instructims?
G,. y o. ;
\\r~
,Le.I) ay o-l*-
- r. a. ale I
y
- sen, e, o, - 19 k.*p tv, L..., 3 1 e a. h *, Hfct
{v a la -.
use e
oa p o.,
o s.
sh p
(,, H... ?
I B7 Where key-lock switches are used:
h7.1 is imediate actuation g required during 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
plant operatim cy or h*
iy\\
wo ll
- 4. ~
- J. lsy
( I - S -.., )
I,.
, e 3. c,,1 B7.2 are keys emveniently located and 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
imediately available
,4 k.
9 h*y No <)elay u.
a B7 3 are keys clearly identified for 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
specific use
(,-). 3 sor**si b ey We to (v,.~o-l l
h7.4 is key use administratively controlled
~4 3 2 1 o_ x 3 =
whe-vs<,
.La n o.j a
- s. bl*
cleslo l f ree *b<*
eN s,
- B7.5 do pmcedures pmvide specific instructions 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
for use
..., Io L.
- 37/v" wiM r >
566<>
E... f,* :
u-le v++
t ay e -f e -s d*,
- f.,
E cc.
,y, f,- 3 rir
+Lc.,
v, t v.,
...l es O
h7.6 is switch action mooth and positive without 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
use of excessive foroe?
O p ra. lve nfd r *y + < *Y l
41-
^
III ColffROL ROOM REVIEW Panel C
AttlDNCIATORS C1 Are anntaciators grouped:
C1.1 withir. anntaciator box by specific systems 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
All HPc r a l. ~.
..fi-(s..,
.4 su-.
5 i
C 1.2 above related controls and displays 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
(~
u
,..., j C13 such that warnintand diagnostic _ alarms are 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
pegregated fmm informaticrial and advisory displays?
s.,
9
- w.,.. u.,
u,. n.. a u,.c,...i,
,,,. a.,
,-. e.
i.. -,
C2 Is alam window:
C2.1 consistent in ncnenelature, use of 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
acronyms, abbreviatic;ts, etc.
Se.
ea- ~ r m Is u.Ju M3 l
C2.2 consistent in type style and the application 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
of type size t
Se a e s - ~
- e \\s v n )*.
ACl C2.3 easily read when stationed at the panel T3 2 1 0 x 3 =
( 21r - )
Se.
- c. -
- Is v-J~
p,. y
~
A t.
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW Panel
-C
.A_lel0NCIATORS (Continued)
C2.4 in accordance with checklist criteria for 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
l changes or modifisticris (see A6_)
- t. GI l.g s s
(
'C2.5 succintly worded ano accarate with respect 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
to input signal ftmotim Saa re-~ r h u ls-A 's. *
- f g
,,,s. 4,,,,
3 g3 p F <. f.s ;
j, v,,,,
p,,,,,,,
v1, 5,,,f g,,
,,,,_,,q pc.d.-
,..... I it.34 6.,..
l...I g ec t
. -. f... b..C~
C2.6 provided with setpoints for parameters with 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
multiple trip levels (water level, vacuum, containment pressure etc.)
d d'y.,u pe k
s <e..I 41<-.
<e g,$.
-g,,.
y
- I *~k-N
s,g g,j
- nrow rntss ~
- t. A-a tt
-.A 4W
- I f
8'#I*b e *'*
- 'kb"",
- '"'7' s
,, g t. )
..l l.
S c <, ~, ye f C2.7 without multiple choice indication 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
(high/ low level /pressta e)
" T,-oAl
~
, lo a a.e dse e s e ~y.l a re C2.8
_prioritized for required response 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
~1evel by legend plate color (preferred) x bulb color in accordance with color use standards (see A4.1) colo<<]
- l, cN M $aa tv ifs C2 9 provided with an alpha-ntaneric code _ in 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
additial to legends for prompt response and positive procedure identification 1
2.
3 1
7
__- f I
A p
lPq s
y =-
=.
c.
=i-
~
l 43-1
l III CDNTIOL B00M REVIEW b, J Fanel C
ANNINCIEORS (Continued)
C3 when an annunciator wincow is acttated:
C31 is there adequate visual distinction between 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
lit and extinguished 11gits
$.~.le.
L.
64 1
(
C 3. 2 is the size and intensity of alam lights 4 3 2 1 0- x 3
=
adequate to command attenticrt?
- 6. -. l.,
l s 4.3 C4 Does the sudible f eature meet checklist criteria 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
for audible displays (see F2L7 Los) e e. f, fo.ea.k.,1, ).s h y.eI.slle Ce
- lo s'<<$s * *, e..f
. er. he bu y, e lc CS For alam response, are the following provided:
RelaW 1-.
C6 C5.1 silence button 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
- s. l.... ). u.
. I.., (-.,
u j...
s. -.,,,... I )
C5.2 acknowledge button 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
4.1,..
o /. 6 fe, w.. /o s ol.)
g u,s
(
C5. 3 res et butten 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
4.l~.<
e i... <) "
.l..
- g us ),
e l...
. :-). -
C5.4 visual and audible test reature 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
.4 u.
n l
l
%/.
s\\,-
f I
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW
\\
O
- e's C
A)NUNCIJtr0RS (Continued)
/
t I
f C5.5 silence and reset buttons of censistent 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
w
-l size, shape, color, sequence and locatiai between panels
..,, -, <, ld... f...I
- 1. <.:,1i. -
(w. d
/
\\
m.tJ of 7,
(,.
6,. u. 6,(
,,, g... ; 14 6, r.,u.,,
u L,-)
S,.
, o g., ~ <
- J 6% s i.. d al
.y.
6
->J I
C5.6
_a "ri est-out" f eature or dual res et for 4 3 2 1 0 x T,= i infomatim retrieval for high priority alarms?
3 F., V ai a w.
),
a.-
kL I+
,r ed c J /a.
ra-n...)
,.,...u,y
[
CS For vistal anntaciatim, will each window:
R el<. kJ 1.
C F. - C F. 3 C6.1 flash for initial alam input 4 3 2 1 0]x 3.s' l'
i OQ h.
\\
C6.2 renain in alam state (solid light) when 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 = -
acknowledged but alam input has not cleared
(
4
~
r s,
~\\
\\
C6.3 reflash for second alam input 4 3 2 1 0 xx3 =
\\
r ha I k l.
n,y.>
. ls. ~ s y
r. /. a. k 6.
)v. ! fe
, /,, -,
.)
\\
- e. 9 l..)t i
(
j
't 1
- t..
s,
'\\
I' \\ ' t, C6.4 automatically blink (at slower rate) 4 3 2 1 C lx 2 =
J.^ ['
when alam input clears
_ *),
\\'
N 1
!+
\\
y
/ -
s s
. s.t 3
' I,'
f i
45-I t
I
[
'1 r
i III bONTROL ROOM REVIEW Panel MNUNCIATORS (Continued)
C.-
'I C6.5 clear only on operator action?
4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
p{,,, h pr*,s, L - Hv.
Le el*cr
- w. * )ss l
(
C7 Do anntaciator response procedures meet
(,,,,,,1 rw. l. ke, b'
- "a--*'*b' l c* ll*
- 'h**
- N pmcedure checklist criteria for:
p.. e)
- s.
C-a,s
- G * ~~ *fy syre.ls ak s e ep a. eke k
C7.1 fonnat (see E3) 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
TIr*
$ $ ' ', yay f*ye F, ee.,e-clef-<*, cIc.
t C7.2 content (see E'4) 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
%" b s l= h ~,ls,
). y a d.<
y.Ja.a.,
..~.I re u lts, p,..I A
- e. ~~ I ev*<* 0*, <'i c.
l*< S.*-<,
ca. i..y y a a t....,
us.
C7.3 reference material (see ES)?
4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
4 8
For aantmciator maintenance:
(,4 w if
.. b -o - - /e la.a
( < * ' " " ' *)
{
C8.1 if bulb mplacement requires legend plate 4 3 2 ) 0 xT=
removal, is there a _ method to assure plate jj mplacement in correct location p p.e I
- e. e k e l {l'**y*l
+ *
- Ya -
A J-..
p oar) a.
L o,
/
f C8.2 has an administrative pmcedure been 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
implanented to allow grompt recognition of an out-of-service anntaciator
<-.t
-..t..,, a.
s 46-
\\
l.
i i.
s i
s
III CONTROL RCDM REVIEW C
AMIUNCIEORS (Continued) l C8.3 are annunciators periodically tested?
4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
(
C9 Are only meaningt alarm present during a given 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
operating state ist cn Cocment Fom)?
ru.,
.N..,,.,
K.
7 - l..,
J a l.. -,.
w.
-:ll
- e.. L. \\ <
tte a l.. -.
p...J J,.,
k skh H.
p hF f. l..-
n.
,,... n,p
,1, u.
i,
- - )..
.. k t l, J, a a,,
.:n
., y... L..
A,t a t,.
o L, )
a la a-f e <J
/,,; 3 s e,,., - o,e ti,. <
L.-
1
--7 So-s h f *s a$
e lo..,, 5 nosso.<
T,,.a.
.l..-,
. t.,
L
,,... /
,p S p. a. l. a
- l...
I-.<.l.d a I <-,
I-,.y.C,a..F a l. a - s geco,,;.3 a l...
C.-
L, t, K4 c, p e <= L-L*.
ec Irel as
(
O 47-
/
III CONTMOL ROOM REVIEW D
CDWUTERS D1 Are the maputer console and output devices:
D1.1 conveniently located and readily available 4 3 2 1 0 xT=
for operator use C.-
La
- b
't
' !I I V
c..
- s. <
s..
VL.
f,,Is
.L.ls v, n :t 1,
(
DI.2 generally laid-out per standards of the 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
anthropometric diagrams (see A1.1)
L,3 r<,
/,,lr I..t L E, e h.
y D1 3 arrange d for visual distinction and 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
use of dials, buttons and switches?
O
- D2 Is the computer:
D2.1 capable of displaying selected input 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
infomaticri D2.2 equipped with display change capability 4 3 2 1 0 xT=
A L.%
S.
vin F
- d. Cle o. h
(*y*s / (e
, h D2.3 available for on-danand use by the control 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
room operator O
48-
III CONTROL ROOM RE. IEW V
D CDNUERS (Continued)
A D2.4 capable of receiving all inputs and 4 3 2 1 0 xT=
perfoming programmed ftmetiens without becoming overloadad
(
i D2.5 availa'31e after power transients 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
or accident conditions o <- e ry la > s
). r.
no D2.6 capable of use in post-transient evaluation 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
- i. (*.
pp e emad#7 fa a $
i D2.7 mpable of autmatic or manual switchover 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
for processor failure ("fallover")?
I,. tr f 7,<-...-
o... l., 61, 3 r,
7f...L t.
-..41 6wR 6 l
4 7
D3 Are CRT displays:
D3 1 accessible and easily visible when 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
staticried at the controls
(
D3.2 comprehensible with a minimta of visual 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
search ye.J.tfa,"
I v.,.. II, a << y.i O..
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW 9
(DMPUTERS (Continued)
D3.3 of adequate br.ishtness for lighting 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 oonditims or equipped with conviently located focus, brightness, and/or contrast controls A)..,.. h G.p..,
J,.p. ),
c l..... k s c r <,
ca k->b o-OnS*~**
- ~ *I
<* A*l * * * ~ ~
I'*) L I ; **)
vawm 4-D3.4 consistent with color standards (see A4.1) 43 2 1 0 x 2 :
Co la.
ta h
,\\.e.l) b ft*
- * ~
- as o
use) y - - els.
o-
'D3.5 color coded so that loss of a primary color I3 2 1 0 x 2 gun does not result in less of a numerical value or scale D3.6 consistent with checklist standards for 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
procedural romat (see E3)
D3 7 identified by system or pmgram 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
T. H.
S i v *,
e-p.3
(
D3.8 pmvided with an access mode for display 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
selectim hither display menu or sectoring mode)
- ,e, m)*,
s e l* c hie N
&~sS p3 I.
_._____________._.._m_
i III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW O
D CDMPUERS (Continued)
D3.9 provided with verification that the 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 computer is operatimal and that data is being updated on a periodic basis?
l D4 For the typer/prirter:
'D4.1 is output prioritized 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
l
'D4.2 is output periodically reviewed and 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 updated so that m1y useful informatim is printed O
i
- 4. 3 is spacity sufficient (output not over-4 3 2 1 0 x 2 :
loaded) o,,. t.,
/,
3....,
,f7
< c p.>,1 f
D4.4 is the output identified by time, date, 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
component and system
'D4.5 is a backup available 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
0.
P l
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW O
D CDMPUERS (Continued)
D4.6 is it silenced to g be a noise distraction 4 3 2 1 0 x 1 :
Te.
. l..
F 7. 2.
h4.7 are paper and ribbon easily replaced 4 3 2 1 0 xT=
of...v
. r.,
..,....s D4.8 are printout easily readable (spacing, 4 3 2 1 0 xla headings, forinats, print, etc.) ?
O i
l l
l O
.g_
l
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW O
- ~*
7 P'
E PHOCEDURES l' "
' " " ".e"or'!***
=l *u.L))#
)
( L.J n
h '.,',47..L.
M,' b ',,.* I O
'7
- N" d
T El Does the control room operator have available:
9-**&
6e p,+, t,
g4
,,, p,, e,,,,, 3,,,$.
,,,3,,.,
E1.1 a full set of up-to-date plant procedures 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
- v., -. I, e,. ) < - *y, a
..,.. l..
,, ),., fv. )...
Lib 6,
- l. b, F e au. s. b.
t E1.2
_a full set of up-to-date emergency, 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
atriomal and nomal procedures for each M on multi-unit plants with a comon control room o-.
$ c4 5
FLe f e f '"* b
~ A ll E.. l.
.. 4
,t.,,lJ k..e "s h t
a.t h.,
f.
S a<*
1 va;F gs f.. b A/A fe.
+. 3 E1.3 a complete set of up-to-date, as-built flow 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
diagrams and schematics O
E1. 4 a set of up-to-date Technical Specifications 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
E1.5 storage space fo: procedures and 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
refs ence materials
(
B..L<.,,
A I,,
e 1..
a hlr essr<I ved**
G i. 7 L a y ale -
< yas e
- E 1. 6 procedural instructions for the operaticn of 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
both manual and automatic controllers c,,.. J
.-,b-,W.->
A,,
c.
L oi1,,
of..
(.., (k.
t.
34 A,,
1
.. L.
w
... I,
,L ) _.
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW i O i
E PROCEDURES (Continued)
E1. 7 lav down snace for use of pmcedures 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
and reference materials?
p,,c,l,,.
w,.
.f Me go. A
-L;te of < a f s.3,y le-s F.,
.., F 7,. b Ta b l e.
,p...
J.
,f,.
('
E2 For imediate access and recognition:
E2.1 are pmcedures readily available and 4 3 2 1 0 xT=
centrally located E2.2 is each procedure binder or folder 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
clearly marked win
..)
a v e b e-al po<*)<<<
na.
o.
be
. h,Je E2.3 does each procedure binder or folder have 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
an index or table of contents i.
He fvu f of ft.
6..).,
E2.4 are mergency pmcedures in a separate 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
binder or folder
(
E2.5 are annunciator response pmcedures in a 4 3 2 1 0 x '2
=
separate binder or folder
' O
1 III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW
- O I
E PROCEDURES (Continued)
I E2.6 are individual procedures readily located 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
(i.e., ttrough use of_ inder tabs _ or alpha-l ntmeric code)?
s.. t.
p,.,1,..
- 6. /,,
,1.,a j 1,...
. /,, f.(
)
- n..,,, b.,
..L.
., 1 C.,
N 7
- E3 Has an administrative procedure been impleented_
f""""
8 / *" ' " b * * *
'###'*)
u "*
'8f
to assure standardization of procedure romat for:
f' ' " " "
i E3 1 type size and style 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
i
}
E3.2 use of nmenclature, granmar, teminologr.
4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
synonyms, acronyms, and abbreviaticris i O i
i i
E3.3 use of as-labeled designations _for 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
components, systems and process taits y,,, )..
, L.tJ M
l i.I p -,I u,..
a 5..
l..,
A S.to, a r., o I
E3.4 ntabering of procedures, paragraphs, steps 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
and sub-steps for increased levels of detail t
- i E s. - p, *.
n.o 8E
.t
- i. a.:
e.2 1 j
J.O j
E3.5 step or paragraph spacing and page layout 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
j and identity i
La3*.
spo s b,lvee-s ec h*-s, As
..m
l III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW E
PRO DURES (Continued)
E3.6 identity or prpose or smpe 4 3 2 1 0 x _1_ =
w u.h Jo,
p.oe Ja.< e....'
4,1. leJ 4 e 't 7 t
E3. ~l entry and exit conditions 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
n<
p.. < a ). ~
l
.y ;<. L le 7 wu a,
,, l..
b, or
/
p oc-) ***.
7 wLe-
-y y..
E3.8 cross-referencing 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
,e(,,,..,
w,,J 7 w k,.
c<.+,
A.
B.y ideal bee.l 6
el a i hr I re-e 7
Sae also G7 O
E3.9 rapid identification and recognition of 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
revisicns or changes?
l ff e,o E4 Do procedures that require operator action:
E4.1 have succinct action verbs 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
,,. 4., :
58..I,
,lf,
..sL.
,,l.
, L,.t>
..t..,-
'S
- "Y > *k
,l desaal, w L..a affast ; I*
5<<
al*
- E f.1, E 4. 5 r
E4.2 have succinct action statements 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
R<l M 4 E 4.I, e 4.7 dp.. t..
,L.,.IJ
.I g,,,,
n r en d 6.
,s.
lom p o <..y:,p,
C.,
, n, J. v oekn t
a O.
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW O
E PIIOCEDURES (Continued)
E4.3 seoarate stens rrce each other and from 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
cautims, notes, reference material, etc.
(
eE4.4 pmvide cautionary statements (that are 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
positimed to relate to the consequences or results of that action)
C. A....
,L.,,.tj a.+
,,.ars,...l s.
t.a a, le)
.F b *y * * *y
- 0 y
t....l. ;.,,.It.
n.,
,1.. a ta e..
yg. t. < < s to Let.
LG.*
e
.pp a,.... s.
on.
Cterh.
..p+
ra a. <..y 1.
.Je s.C,
..,,1..,)
e..l..
E4.5 minimize the need for memorization 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
of actims 5,.
. l,,
e 4, y p
t-- e]. \\.
ac k....
sL. it L.
Jar e< 4
..J
- e. sy b
- y er.L-h e*-e-L~
Y
- s..I p,.
<J...
s!. tJ
..t 5aaJa.. h.. F Le ~
~e-t.
- h Ie 1.
..,. a
,%.... s E4.6 distinguish between mquired (shall) and 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
optimal (simuld) actims
~
0 e..l r sI,,,ald k
e.
I.. e L
, iep,,4 a.y, a re a4-L :s l
- c #
- b k*
- y E4.7 distinguish between autanatic and manual 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
actions E4.8 pmvide symptomatic or diagnostic analysis 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
or entry event guidance to asstre correct procedure is in use
- o.. (. a.,(.. I,
.y..(... Ie C.,
e 3 o..,
- y..,).. ; o j.. k.
L..I1
%-'~
1
, L..I.
p,...).,.(+)
4, v><
3.65.s,
,o a
3..,,.
E.-
ple :
, -ett sao d,,L..tJ L.
s, s e II.y.
C.y e tt f *.< <
- t a.- a.
i...e,
u.t i.. >.
c..c.....+
...a u... x c..+..
u,.
. Sea.u.
& s. s, G 3. 7
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW E
PHO DURES (Continued) h4.9 give required operational seoimmina 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
of actima and identify acticris which should be perfomed in parallel f * *' '0* ',*
- S " '.0 f.,,
, L.. * *, sL*U
.)* l.f
- L*'U b'
' c '" ~
,L t/
,,,,.J r.l.
toca s.6
.)
A-n.35/ 7,n 7.,.....
se to k2 q. s < <J.. r, et..I s t.,6.,,
, L,.tJ
,,. /... t.
f.at.y, A, s i.4.p
, k.
I Op*=b" f.y F u r a s,..,
,]<. t.C 7
4.10 identify critical stem where errors of 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
omissim, commission or sequence annot be tolerated
(),LJ
- p., 6...,l
. ly
.,,, f.. l-g, r
a,,. L.
f
..f
. ec e....f 4.
.J, L.C I
A f
f~f E4.11 integrate charts, diagrams, and graphs 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
into body of procedure as needed to directly supplanent steps p
A7 el. F y.,, L
,,y ;..)
6, na y..,.<)..
, l,. Ll sa
,.al J /
U E4.12 pmvide physical panel locations of 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 = _ _ _
referenced instrtunentaticri and hardware, especially those that are infrequently used l.-p...lv.s f.,
s.l....
,(
f...I J... L..y y.*.s s
ya, e o * =3 s m.. +
6 c Leeke).
3, to.:J e.
s L..U be
-p. *.<
E4.13 give nonnally expected results_ (such as 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
valve positicns, flow rates, currents,
alarms indicating lights, etc.) where appmpriate i
- n. <r.u e~
,1.,
.. c,,..... + j... t..,.,..,..... -
r..
,t..a u
1., u E4.14 give setpoints and sensor identity for 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
annunciator response O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW E
PROCEDURES (Continued) h4.15 give equipnent and administrative limits 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
for operatim s st.l.
te.k
,7,c it ele, 4,,j,,,6 l.. l.,,,, k. f I.
43,
,fc a.
d e r. \\e s
- y.4 e* erose y S.
y
,),. L.Q e s a-p l,,
,,,L,, e aedol i
E4.16 aive continnency actinna or conditional 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
instructicris if expected results or actims are not achieved S y. le -
4:,.
../
. l,.4, if 4,
1,,,, /
..F
,,, L,,,4 if a AI
/e,.
o, of,,. I.,
f,7
,, f ).
E4.17 emphasize the use of multiple or independent 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
indimt i ma to provide feedback that an acticm has occurred in response to a control command
.Ii
../.,(....
- e. L,, k. 3
. l,,
l,.,l G. I.
e.
4.18 limit actions to those that are 4 3 2 1 o' x 2 =
essential and effective s,.,.i..
.,.f i,
,),, s, e,
- a..,,
a.,,
eE4.19 explicitly contain all essential 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
actims_ and not require use of
,,,,,, g 3,9 *g7 reference material for those actions e...L.
> L., t)
G
. ble 4.
e r.) tkf
.It
,-- e]. A a,la u -,
r m..r
- k..r 6 ;, j 1.,
8,,
p m e4,<.
3 dre ele.
s-y,Y o,,es s a ry I,
,J, Uy J.,<,ep.,,,,
E4.20 identify how or gemergency systems or 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =__
-automatic controls may be manually controlled or overridden _ af ter autcznatic initiation w k,,
e,
,f pf f.., f..
l e b
ft
~...<. I. <e.. /.
,.kb>
w..
Ecc51 op,,a le.
- e. a
<ll,
' ;lt. l e
- A09, SL,A) wa:1 G.-
an o,
4 b -,f.
i ; h.lic. ?
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW O
E PROCEDURES (Continued)
E4.21 identify conditions under which instrtment-4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
aticr1 may be inaccurate and stress the use of multiple indications e..).
we. tv te.si s -sb*~ *~ h
(
'E4.22 provide direction for placing and maintain-4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
ing the plant in cold shutdown with multiple failures of non-safety grade systems or components?
ES When reference material is identified in a procedure:
E5.1 is it readily available 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
C*-
he ag e..le -
es,;1 C.)
- G 7
E5.2 is the latest available revision identified 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
L pos r}er a.
s.
ES.3 are steps or actions compatible with the 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
procedure from which it is entered y,,,ll.)
ca.
s,
,7..
- l., L n., s,tt p,,,,),,,,
iK..t e o. l,,J.,1 7
,.., fl
(,.3 J,p, {
e,
- F p.... I, !,
L.
6 A '.
4=
C.\\lo -
t,. tt et o.ae Are seq :.1, se~a u.
., c...
e,,.. L..
s.
,,ta..) s, a...
<. -). u. -, -
E5.4 is it standardized or condensed for ease 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
of use?
O III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW E
PROCEDURES (Continued)
I n.,
,,,W..
r..ll a, le f.,
i y
For revisim or correctims to procedures, is ala.- p*>.l***
c.'<<-i n t%<ie 'e4c-sj g
there a % trolled methop E6.1 to assure operator review and walkthru 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
to verify correctness, understanding and ability to use Se=
a I'
- 24
(
slo.Il aff-e..
So - a. -..- 3 6 ef<<.h...
e = p c<. e -e
- p < s. e/ < -s a<
J.
6,r
"l I I' E6.2 for operator feedback and to clarify intent 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
of changes recommended by operators n,.
.L..lJ 6<
7,,. la.
.. f., l-
,, t,,
f.,. L.
p<a. m.
e,-.,-
E6.3 for feedback to the operator as to 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
~
resolutim of recommended change Dy 10 of,,. l..
<< <. - -, 1.
. l...,,, L.
, l, t/
(,.
- 4. fl d
4:s oeg
,4 is
., <a q tal reyeded..)
L.
e, 7
E6.4 to permit temocracy or interim revi=4 m 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
by shif t personnel to allow deviation from approved procedures u,,.ll c e,,< </
leel y
<f ees E6.5 to assure pecept revisim (both interim 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
and permanent) to incorporate desian changes or operational deviations
,.l,:. ),., h ila l.< -.]
- fl. %
-.J.C.,. h..
[,.. s.
a L..y
)
y ca.l, I,) s L.ll 6 e.
veo.foreled e ~ le fac. d* < *s E6.6 to assure prompt review and amoreval bv_
4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
personnel experienced in operatim_t and mgineering or design See a f, e H. I O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
III CO:RROL ROOM REVIEW E
PROMDURES (Continued)
E6.7 for prompt distribution and updating of 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
controlled sets {especially control mom)
(
E6.8 for destruction of superseded controlled 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
co pies E6s9 for updating of Index or Table of Contents 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
to show latest available revisions of all pmcedures E6.10 to evaluate and _ incorporate changes made by 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
operators cr1 control panels such as scales or pmcess units, cautionary or infomative notes, power sources, charts and graphs, etc. ?
S,.
al+.
A 4. 7 Has an administrative procedure been established
,4,,7;)
p,.,c,4.,,3 l
to require:
E7.1 recording of time, date and signature (or 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
initials) on all log book entries j
l Th.,
off
.e.
Jo d
).3, kres ; m.1
.f f.,,
w L..,
,,y.:,/
l
.4 a.4 a...).
E7.2 marking of charts and graphs en a regular 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
basis i.e.
4.
, ), L,
.. k,(,
J,(,ff
,(,,
1,.
.1,.
p 3. n. _ ____________________ _.
III ColffROL ROOM REVIEW l
E PROGDURES (Continuod )
I E7 3 recording or both pemanent and temporary 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
plant and equilment status chanan, including saintenance and testing activities Pw f
,L,I.,
,p.f.,F
.A J
,,,,b.,
>J., k Lg 7,c c e,,,/ de f
E7.4 reeNing of verbal instructions and 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
1 feedback on execution
>kd
+7 > b ~~.
d,Ja.
C.-
,L.N s.g o. :ve-le y, o e....I : e.9 l
p,, f.,.
- l.,,,f,, c 8..
E7.5 recording of cyclic operations or transients 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
5.,- -4 HPci sl.,k, 4,, s...
k.7,,, L, of,..
I,L if M.
.,.,1,-
)
f,-..
Teck
,,-e
- O u..... ~
E7.6 recording of other infomation useful to 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
other operators or supervisors G..y--J y.. GIr~s, ek S
E7.7 reading and initia11na of lon books by 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
supervisory personnel on a regular basis 5L.C4
+.f,.si..,
3L,.Il p e.4 li:3 i re,.
all l
.e y.,
ml. h
(
fee
.4, M 1.L E7.8 retenticri of log books and reeceder 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
charts in permanent p3 ant files for required periods of time?
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW F
CONTROL ROOM ENVIRCNPENT F1 Are commtmisticn systems:
F1.1 redundant, diverse or varied (such as hand-4 3 2 1 0 x "T =
held, sotmd powered, dedianted to specific panels, radio, bell) 0,,.
7,,. l.,
L.
lle,.l.
of c, L.h 3
-- l y of d"> ?
n,...
(
'F1.2 available for emergency or abnomal use 4 3 2 1 0 xT=
(such as a loss of nomal power)
F1 3 accessible from each panel, tmobstructive, 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
and orpnized A& l.
4.
6.
v,/
e4.ll pe a,fs e,
c c. l.L
, w. ).k
- 1... //e D.
..f 4,, 0,..
- w.. n 7,,. t..
a.f...I..,
..... i..,
u, 8 F1. 4 available to the control room operator 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
on a priority basis c.,
L
,.,,,c/,
,,,,, J,..,, j',,,,,, : ;,
,,,,,,,,,,,],,.,
< -,,3, y I h1.5 mpable of accessing all in-plant areas 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
La.l e.,..,1,,
s;4
>wfl.a.,.%
e ~ l..
A
,y -a, la < < s geg,.,,
cy r,a le.
s., la ~. < ~,
e,.;
rey.r.,e v ~ ry.
I F1.6 designed to permit hand free operation 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
ll<al el, [ /,.lc
.l.
owmIdle O
(
-6 4 -
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW O
F CONTROL ROOM ENVIROiENT (Continued)
F1.7 equipped with channel select 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
(
F1. 8
$ysically adjustable for individual users 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 :
Fe.
kealsek F1.9 provided for dedicated links to the 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 :
F1.10 distinctive / color coded 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
c f.
.. ),,
L.
Its.c y \\ -a, Ical J..y LL~,
- Tsc, eAe.
F1.11 clearly understood, intelligible and free 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
from reverberatian?
Mk e f e<o br
- o-J L,Ic=
- 7..,cI#
3 F2 Are audible signals (such as bells, klaxons and sirens ):
F2.1 distinguishable for alam location 4 3 2 1 0 x1=
I).< ele w k.< L f a *l ko, e la a.
a-0.W ~b freg w e-es os, J. Cla.aJ p..)
f fh<*',
l's f -< $*
- c S f' 5 '* / I"
O Ia A.4, t.
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW F
CONTROL ROOM ENVIRCNENT (Continued)
F2.2 prioritized 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
l J.,. l e.
,.p<l...e J
e l.<
23 tested on a periodic basis 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
,,,...a e,
,...a.
1 F2.4 audible in all parts of the control room 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
0 F2.5 not irritating or excessively loud (90 db 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
maximta)
T W.
- s. y n.l 5,.
le.f, F 2. 6
+.ys l.d e uy
.y..je; N.
b o-s 9.e.
1.ere s er. e-
..l as a
p Q eal..e e
y e.,.l 4,.
, L,,IJ
.l..
4.
e..J.
F2.6 loud enough to be heard during noisy 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
periods (at least 20 db over backgrotmd)?
s.e F 7.1 C.
p r a.,.,,. L fe 4,.s ly e a-l
(=~eh
.. sy,J..
, m. l.,. l.,:,.
u,
Le..
,,, z). ;
- 9...
L,,e
> L..f)
.lso
(,,
- m. /.
F3 Is lighting:
F3.1 adequate at panel surfaces (30 footcandles 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
minimte, 50 f oot <=ndl e recommended.
Measure at(each operating ar@ and record on Control Room Arrangement Diagram)
M.
,..e
.d ec h f
n4 cy ra Is. s
]<A, co-y b' O.
y a.o,
b.sL yo-*l ov, h ca, a le,
p e > < )a.
s fe y a***
5+< rs.s C.
. ~y.,7 l.3L f.:.3
- o. l.,. 4....--
A III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW J
F CONTROL ROOM ENVIRCNENT (Continued) l F3.2 ditruse or indirect to eliminate glare?
4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
l Gl...
7 6.
J.,,. I,,
,,ft.c4,/
5,.
.1,.
62.2, s1.15
(
F4 Is control room heating and ventillaticrl:
F4.1-adequate for both operator comfort and 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
ecpignent perfomance (normally between 65-750F and 25 455 relative humidity) 14,,c,./
4, p,,.l..,
./
h, ~ /. l wa/s, e<,+
co l.I.**
cw f
F4.2 diffuse to eliminate areas of stagnation or 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
direct blowing?
- Dee, n.4 6ta J.,,, y I' ' 9*{*
" k T
F5 In case or fire:
F5.1 is rire-righting equipnent imediately 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
l accessible ca, Le gd L.
- F e) if e a s'e l
<>.J g.:Aly Aca s,s'.Ue e s e.
y h5.2 is there an autmatic warning system?
4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
a n.,
,.a.-
.,, s..
u.-..,.. q-F6
_During emergency sittaticris:
6.1 is access to the control rom procedurally 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
oontrolled p,
e f e,e f.o--
f.,...,1 li. e a L,:h to li ; f ceA l
.m.,
c.,
7 -.7 III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW F
CONTROL ROOM EWIRCNENT (Continued)
F6.2 is protective clothing accessible 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
'r *
- F S. I C.,
el ne e,, il<
- r. e e -. 9
(
F6.3 is breathing apparatus accessible 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
Se <
F F. I F6.4 is portable radiation monitoring equipnent 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
accessible fr. F F. !
4 eF6.5 is special clothing or breathing equignent_
4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
compatible with required operator fmetims_
for visibility, reach, tactile sensitivity,
commtmimtim, hearing and weight c.
a,
,f
,.l..
,E4-1
.f,-.h Fit r f-.f
-+,3 n..
y-y~ l?
7 I
F6.6 are sanitary facilities and drinking water 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
accessible See F S'. (
h6.7 have opvisions been made for handling of 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
deleWoneTmmmicatims when operator is occupied do l. de.
c o., < -; <. } i,
As h Co.,
a).-
y < s: *)-.s }el..l..y e r.pa < s. l. l. h *,
- *" ' *) " *7
- ~
. i..
- n.,
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW F
CONTROL ROOM ENVIRODENT (Continued) eF6.8 are esermency lighting levels adequate 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
(20 footcandles minista at panel strfaces.
Measure at each operating area and doctment on Centrol Room Arrangement Diagram.)
See M. !
FI In general:
F7.1 is the noise level mutinely below an 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
interference level for normal conversatim
( 65 dbA ma ximtn. Measure in both dbA and 5,,
,,1,,
f 7. 2,
/ 2.T dbC at each operating area and document on Control Room Arrangenent Diagram)
See F 3.1 o.1,. yade;
. L)*<h-c
~ < L-F~
s\\. U
.<l~ b* ~=le.
W.,,s...
- ..., se..
F7.2 have _nois distractions from both inside 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
and outside the control room been reduced
'Is e l'2. C, F 7.1, V h.1, Ty.., usa C.,,. h h
M......,
, c.,, I..,. 4..,,
U,.
og.f *.4 co u
- e.,
jos,s co.I,elres, ca.y*$.=y s eero-he 0*
e.
4.te, et<
or F7 3 is there _adeounte, organized storane somea 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
for protective gear, persmal belmgings,
spare parts, tools, etc.
s,.
t,.
c,r.1, cr,9
'F7.4 are snoking and eating areas controlled 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
h.
t+
- s..
M r... )
Le..
ey... ).,.,
alt. <J So e.1 ?
s..
4..y.f,1 " p, u.t,..,"
9,.,
, J,,.,,,
Am
,,e.,
.~.Je p. - el,,
- 4. L,....I ah F7. 5 is the control roem clean and free of 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
trinecessary loose paper, books and other materials cl.,,i aye-,-.)
b v... k,,f.. 3
'> e.
al a F 7. L III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW F
CONTROL ROOM ENVIRGIENT (Continued) rt. 6 is the control room free of safety hazards 4 3 2 1 0 x 1 =
such as loose floor mats, Icrig phone leads, defective furniture, etc.
5<=
. l..
F 7. 5 t
F7.7 is seating provided at consoles for control 4 3 2 1 0 x 1
=
room operators adjustible from 15 to 18 inches?
O O _
4 s
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW O
i
)
G MAINIENANCE AND SURVEILLANCE i
- G1 Are operstor maintenance ftmetims and strveinance responsibilities:
G1.1 clearly established.
4 3 2 1 0 xT=
,,, f.... L. l.$
1.
it c L.1,
/,A. /
L.
k.,
\\_
C.,
,.t..
,...i......
..c l.
,<p L. s y i
(
b.Is, I.,LF f,,lauri, I.,
pa s L *.,,
p-y 1
6,...bie *
<. lee - i 9 ti, fl.,.,,, cic, N **3 G 1.2 adminstratively controlled?
4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
/
- G2 Are jtapers and lifted leads:
G2.1 procedurany controHed 4 3 2 1 0 xI=
O G2.2 appmved and periodicany reviewed 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
l 02.3 distinctive or color coded 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
l l
G2.4 tagged and logged for traceability?
4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
0 l -
4 III CONTROL RTM REVIEW O
G MAINTENANCE AND SURVEILLANG 003 Are permanent modificatims:
5<<
A6 G-
!< ~rs. f
,/.fie bas G 3.1 recorded en as-built drawings 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
to slow specific changes glo,k...I pr. k,
- p.. el. ara.go-o,is, e yadny
.l****~ys, 9 I C 's, ok
(
s G 5. 2 incorporated into operational procedures?
4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
- G4 Are tags:
G 4.1 procedurally controlled 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
0 G 4.2 readily available 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
G4.3 installed to not obscure components to 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
which they are attached or adjacent emponents re,,.ils a s p.. l. a., *.
s%.A c-Id e ls, s -= It -
ley,, **hl da, < le G 4. 4 distinctive for each fmetional use 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
Ca hu,
Da y e, Ihl), e la.
O - _ _.
'\\
,l I
N l
i%
t III CONTROL ROOM REVIE1!
O.
G MAINTENANCE AND SURVEILLANCE (Continued)
\\
a G 4. 5 reada ble 4 3 2 1 0 <x
=
s G 4. 6 temporm y 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
i G 4. 7 logged for traceability 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
0 G 4. 8 periodically reviewed?
4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
n.
er C..
I,,
M..
ene.
C r
- A. e For operaticrialhre parts)
,,,p,g
,,,,,,,,,,,,4,,,,,, (f,, g gf, g,.,,,,,,;
G5 G5.1 is there an adequate supply of fuses, 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
indimting lights, ink and inking pens,
recorder charts, computer paper, etc.
G S.2 are they readily accessible 4 3 2 1 0 x 1 =
See a l,.
F 7. 3, G $*.17 O
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW G
MAINENANCE AND SURVEILLANCE (Continued)
- G S. 3 are necessary or special replacement 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
tools available B.,I L p<lle,,,
..,< - ),.-
,. l.
G S. 4 is adequate storage space available 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
5,<
abe r 7. 3, G 5. 2 G 5. 5 where different types, sizes, or styles 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
are required, are they clearly and dis-tinctively marked to avoid misapplication s tL 4 7 y e,,
e t...A f *y * *,
p*..lel c *e *S bw-l<>
- Nc G S. 6 can they be installed witrout disconnset-4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
ing linkage or removing component internals?
Sea
. ts e 61.9, 6 %. T (K..
.4 e, I, Ffle b raa)**}
e, a
- G6 Do maintenance and surveillance _ procedures.
require:
G 6.1 opera bility verification when returning 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
l any system or component to service i
S=
M deleah.e eaq.. k Jo.
.I h.4 a
ca.,
- a p
4ip le-
,,1... /
4.
s,,....
G6.2 notification of operatiorn personnel 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
i Pth prior to and upon completicut of all I
activities? 1
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW G
MAINIENANCE AND SURVEILLANCE (Continued)
G 6. 3 out-of-service caponents and equipnent 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
to be clearly marked at the control staticra to preclude inadvertent operaticr.ind to provide distincticr2 of that conditim
- 7... L.
/,.
..I
,,1
/, fu f <.
. - l ~ ~, P i
rt.&
A o
7 G 6. 4 use of checklists or statue boards 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
to identify out-of-service equipment G6.5 use of checklists or status boards 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
for routine activities
, oa..
- c. l. L, l..,
f,,,,4,.,
5
....Il....
4,1. -),<k O
G 6. 6 prioritization of control room 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
maintenance 7 s
0 _ -.. - - -.
III CONTROL ROOM REVIEW H
TRAINING AND MANNING cH1 Does the training /requalificatim program:
H1.1 use new or revised pmcedures as they are 4 3 2 1 0 xT=
implemented
(
H1.2 identify known limitations of instrtment-4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
atim displays in the control room
- e. S,
le,,I
, d,.., l.1;,-
l H1.3 pmvide for perodic review and walkthru of 4 3 2 1 0 x 3
=
emergency procedures by operators O
H1. 4 include training in the use of the 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
computer and CRT displays?
- H2 For control room manning, are administrative guidelines established:
H2.1 to limit the ntaber of hours an operator 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
l may work in any given period of time H2.2 to evaluate the physical and mental 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
oonditim of m-coming shift operators m a daily basis O~
6, d.F4 q,,, t..
v...,
,,g,,,,)
- 14.... o.
.r i Tee W ei, k L, e., A. a.. II, J., s.G)
l III 00 nth 0L ROOM REVIEW O
H TRAINING AND MANNING H2.3 to define specific duties. responsibilities, 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
work locatims and authority for all shif t members, especially during emergency sit uations?
- o. *p * *S* -
L=*~
~\\*
- np s ** lie L' ~GV h n
- ~*=9*-si ?
.s o.
., p.. l..
L..-
. l..
c. --.. J
.1,,.
,,.7 9f,,
l m.
- 3. -, +
p.f e
+t,
c,. L.
,,, 1
(
5..
al.,
r 6. 7, Gl
- 33 During shift change:
H3.1 are cmgestim and potentially disruptive 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
sittatims averted H3.2 are administrative procedures established 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
to require reading of log entries and review of status boaras Dy on-coming shitt
' j persmnel fmm time of previous shif t co verage 5..
. l.,
E77 H3 3 are written instructions and checklists 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
used?
I l
O
IV EMERGENCY PROCEDURE WALKTHROUGH O,
DISCUSSION The purpose of the Emergency Walkthrough is to evaluate the operational aspects of control room design in terms of control / display relationships, display grouping, control feedback, visual and communication links, manning levels and traffic patterns.
As a minimtm, walkthroughs will be conducted for emergency procedures for a small break inside the containment, a stuck open relief valve and a loss of feedwater. Additional procedures for normal or transient conditimts may be
(
selected at the discretion of the sta vey team.
The ualkthrough is conducted in the following sequence:
- 1) Evaluate the selected procedure for confomance to procedure criteria as given in part III E of the Control Room Review checklists. Record the results of this evaluation in part IV A.
- 2) Develop a scenario for each selected procedure. Include the entry conditions, symptoms, transient trends, equipnent failures and end points that the operators must take into consideration when performing the procedure. An experienced SRO should validate the developed scenario.
- 3) Develop a task analysis for each transient using the selected procedure and scenario. The task analysis should identify the task sequence, critical controls and displays, annunciators and required operator actions to be evaluated during the walkthrough. This task analysis is to be validated by an experienced SRO.
- 4) Perform a walkthrough of the transient using the procedure and task analysis. This is accomplished by first giving the control room operator the preselected symptoms (entry conditions). The operator must select the correct emergency procedure and complete a step-by-step simulation of that procedure, pointing out each control / display used or referenced and communication links or tasks where assistance is required. As the walkthmugh progresses,.
additional infomaticri (contingencies, equipment failures, etc.) is presented to the operators as necessary to reach the predetermined end point. Additional operators may assist the control room operator only if they would nomally be expected to be available.
Traffic patterns, equipment locations and operating areas are recorded on the Control Room Arrangement drawing that most closely depicts the control room being evaluated. Solid, dashed or dotted lines may be used to identify operators by primary responsibility or function. Indicate the locations of desks, chairs, procedures,
panels, cabinets, consoles or other pieces of equipment or furniture as near to scale as possible.
O IV DERENCY PROCEDURE WALKTHROUGH DISCUSSION (Continued)
As each task is addressed, determine if adequate infomation is provided, if sufficient personnel are available to ccanplete the task and whether each critial control and display meets checklist criteria given in part III of the Control Room Survoy. Note discrepancies in Coltan 5 of the Task Analysis as the walkthrough progress es.
Notation should also be made of omissions or errors in the procedure or task analysis if identified by the operator during the walkthrough.
5)
Summarize deficiencies noted in review of the arrangement drawings and coltann 5 of the task analysis. List these deficiencies by general ategory in part IV B of the Ccritrol Room Survey, cross referencing to checklist criteria where applicable.
O O
i IV EERGENCY PROGDURE WALKTHROUGH TMEEE ssuno Procedure Selected SRO Review Include entry conditians, symptoms, transient trends, equipment failures and end points.
i l
O i
l l
0 - _ _ _
i IV EER2NCY PROGDURE WALKTHROUGH l
TASK ANALYSIS INSTRUCTIONS
( 1) TASK The task sequence is developed fmm the procedure being evaluated and the predetemined scenario. Each required operator action is listed as a separate task with diagnosis considered the first task for emergency pmcedures. 32btasks are listed in the same coltan, identified by indentatim.
(2) DEVI2/ LOCATION For each task or subtask considered in Coltaan (1), the primary control or display utilized by the operator in accmplishing this task is identified and located.
(3)
ASSOCIATED DEVICES / LOCATION Listed is this colten are any devices associated with the primary control or display listed in Coltan (2). This may include backup instrtmentatim, indicating li@ts, alarms, etc.
(4)
ASSISTANG/CDMMUNICATICNS Notatim is made in this coltan if assistance is required by the operator to emplete the task or if a communication must be made.
( 5) NOTES Any item fotnd discrepant in the walkth ough will be listed in.this colinn. For each task, coltons (1) thmu@ (4) are analyzed in tems of the following considerations:
- Is the sequence valid and emplete?
- Is sufficient infomatim immediately available to the operator to emplete the task?
- Does each critical control and display identified in columns (2) and (3) confom to checklist evaluation criteria?
- Do control / display relatimships meet checklist criteria?
- Are shift manning levels adequate to perfom the task?
- Are traffic patterns tnobstructive?
- Is direct feedback used % verify control ftnetions?
O. _ _. _..........
O\\
n O
IV EMERGENCY PROCT h.c WALKTHROUGH TASK ANALYSIS PROCEDURE SELECTED SRO REVIEW SHEET OF Task Device / Location Associated Assistance /
Notes (1)
(2)
Devices / Location Communications (5)
(3)
(4) i --
0
IV DERENCY PROCEDURE WALKTHRU CHECKLIST Precedure Selected:
A Does the emergency procedure selected meet checklist standards for precedure:
Al standardization and format (see III.E3) 4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
i A2 operator acticri (see III.E4) 4 3 2 1 0 x 3 =
A3 use of reference material (see III.ES)?
4 3 2 1 0 x 2 =
i O
f B.
Summary:
Area of Ccricern Checklist Item (s) l l
O. - - _..
y O
L'I control ROOM ARRANGD2NT PLANT / UNIT PROCEDURE DATE COMMENTS
(
\\
(
\\\\
t
/N
\\\\
\\
\\s N
\\
s\\
N l
~
O l
0 4
h g
(7
't
contact no0M ARRANGEMENT PLANT / UNIT PROCEDURE DATE COMMENTS k
x<
\\
N
\\N O
e A
1
%/,
o' O(
CONr40L ROOM ARRANGEv."NT PLANT / UNIT PROCEDURE DATE COMMENTS
/
\\
/
/
x,.
\\
-1
/
'\\
J.
t, I
l O,
p 1
t l
l
_-8 6 -
PEMy' umr i
- .M7?O ' Roy PME~L s' RMy J
AssEinr5L)/
t ACPANGCME/Vi
~bk&3 67d'l-#=
GE DvM #
pa 7sx #
1913-P& oO 666E37(o 50- 30-0
- P Go I-lb6 85iE82i A S 48-58 -o
- lGC
~
ES22 42 43-59-o u
i E8 23 AE 48-60-l 42.
-I7B o
- 17C i<
E 8 2 4 4 8 49-6i-O
- 18 B o E8 2.5 /E -
4 8 -B -O
- 18 C ES2GA/
48-63-0
- 19 8 E827.Eh 4 8 l - I + 2 i-
- 14 C E^S?8/E 43-55-0 v
Jl
-20E
E S 2 9 A 6 4!3-GG - / ( 2
- 2OC E~8 bo./l.&
/l8 - & *i - O i,
-2iE
<<l'2?1AL 18 - : I i 2
- 2/ C ES32AE J3-6 9 -0 9
C333Ac (S - 7b - 0
-2 2 B
'e ES34 A E 43-7/-O Y
-22c i
-P604 793 E605~
+ 3 - ll % -l 1 2-
-P6/2 695EWS
-j3_
3;.;
-96/4 865E 797 48-105-O
_-P6tB S6&E 324 48-231-lt2 f(s/9 l 37 D7/80 4 8 - 101 - O t 37 o 7/9a 48-733-o
-PG2/
_O-Pe22
- 3 7 3 7 5 o g.
43-93_f
\\-Pb23 j')/D 7613 48-l: 7-o
((_f675 SG5 E 77.9
% - !~f -0 1
_?-
_.@smPAN &2 #
GE Dun GAT 19%
=-
IRIS - P G 28 896 E' 3 %
-;3
- 3 C - O
- P (,2 9 SGs F 32S l' 3 - / 7
- / -! 2.
- P(o3l 8 66 E 3 2. 0
-: S-2 E 2 - O
- P lo S2.
SesC SE 2.
4 3
.'5o -o
- P G42 Sis 2 R:f 43-/57-0
- P654' 866 E 4 to 48 - ! ?l - o
- Pfo S5 8 !5 5 E 7 3 [
L3 - l5 7-l
-Pbb?
SCI E 9 /9 / E 48.'(3-0
-P570 8 5 'i= 9 2 O A E 43
.' ' 9 - O
- p *, 7 !
851F 92 i A S 4 3
.*i~C-o T G72 8stE422AE
?
,
- 5. ' - O P
~b - 9630-T E l ?,3 D ?S.'O A E.
48-43-D
-orc es /e Bo/ A s 4 2 - ci: - o
-olD I 33D 9g 26 Aa 48-45-o
-02B I3309SI9AB 48-44-o
-02c 85/FSo3AE 49-SJ -0
-02t
( S3L9 927AB 43-16-o
-03e 865E 487/A 48-75-O I
-03C 3 C E 2 0 C.-1 8 46'
.?f 'O l
-0SD o 's E 45:~/A 43 - 1?-O
-one 353 E n'.H 4A
+5-77-o
-oz :
er. ? m 'E 48-Ss-0
-j -C
/47 D 793 43-GN -O
_(_
-03 DI l
~. E ~j s ; -? 6 ?C -O
- Y_. c. 2
!.: ? C 'j,
- i
.d S - 3 7:} -O
~
4l -- vf I 9isc 9 :;.
- f 3 - !;. 5 - 0 v
.~
~~l
l 2-O' PA NE!#
diC V M -*=
6C DM =
///l3 - P68 J- 035 7/3 E' ??S 48-682-o 3 s E 999 48-683-o
-6Sc
/
-038 8:b5E 431//
4 8 o
{~"
-09c 3.5 ( E8/bAB 48 0
-0?c IB3D %? Ia A E 48 0
-IIEl 9ls 298 7 48-679-l42.
I37 D830SAA 48 - 5~2 -0
-IS &
- IS C 8G5 E 49/ AA 48- 078 -O
- J5D 137D 8007AA A 3 - 'il - O
- $fuy
/47 D 773/
48-69/-o l
M 7 D ~773 2.
AA-677-o h
l
- VE.
9t3 E 99 5 58 - 6E6 O
+ - r. L 92SE32l 48-II90-I 6 8
-pb91 866 E~ 33 (o 48-2: 43-0
-P642 BGG E 33 8
D I 52.-5 cu,s l - 930-!_f
~
35 3E 502 5-: 3-t u. to s ;j j
-9807 33Co?
!-201-15 I sp. is
\\-PS n 86&E 5D4 E-20 ! - 15 [ 3N.l7-(?
mimic
!37 D 99 33 1~- ?2;
'.5l 5l.:.23 O -esa y sss egas e-2ai - e u.21
-P8;)
355 E 7J&
E 20! - 15 l
's H. 2 3
-P6 'l 3 $ G5 50 7 E-20/-!5/
V.2F V -PS2/
42-n 2
_ s, -
- Of/jNEl W 6 E.]kib &
&l.~I bb)$ -
lHe-P823 866E508 E-201-15i ri 2 7
-P 84 2 8GG E5/0 E-2 o l -l S/
- m. a l
-P 845 6; s = M-f 43-203-0
~.
-P,Sh.E' Sab E5:2 E-2a!-is( v. 27i 13
-F oS So: o? L=.al e
..o.
~r
. o
- a.
s m
o
-P869 856' E5!b E - 20 : - !s ' w 43 " n
-ps,a es&E 52j E-20!-: El v:.c;-Go
- P8 7 0 - IB I37 b7954 48-6'22-l42-Ic D7955 E-2 o : - i s,
- +. G 5~da l
l
-28 C7?S?
E-2 = t - i s i
'..,3 " b i
-2C 07057 E 2OI-IS/ 2h'.7/
7B C_
-28 D7953
( '201-16(
- 3 (_.
O 785 C- _....
'3'. 7 5 p 7(.
E-20 /- IE/
9' 76??.
't.
L'^D T-20 -!Sl su.5Ii32
'?C L ' 'l E-201-15 I vF.54i85
-55 L N.'c E-20 -1if S I-i 87 l83 1
Li?.n C-2 a l-t si n. ?w,
-';?
K '. H :
E 20:-:s!
su.
93 G4
^
L
-> l b?'\\E E~- 20 ( -15(
2M, 95*?7
~
l
- ~'?
(;'?
E.20s-!Et 9
?;fl3o
- ~. ' '.
L').'
6~ 201 -t 5l :.s. lo2 r,$ S i :) : >
.c. 2 n,.a:
e
- n..y
, 3e r-ty, 796 9 E-2ol-15/
3H. lo3 l /09
^
G l
- 92 L'if 70 E-20i - 151 E-lll 4 0 2
- ? ::
]Q E -20i -15l S-IiL f its' T ~~
v
- .: 7.
v ;y?g 7
- f. 20/ - 5 !
u.117 f
c Os
_.,VPJ/KL &
E E :n i== ~
G C i,:.j 6 2
It!!= - P S t ]
8%F529 E-2c>l - / 5 l 1.c. isa - 131 t
-PS 7 7 - tB I37b M50 E - 201 - 151 s7!.1354/36 I
- I C.
/37b 7?5!
E-2ol -/5 /
af/./ sad.'EF
-28 137()/952.
E 2ol -/El 3H. /4 )
' /42 y
- 2 c.
!3;/ L 7f c3 E-2oI-is !
s.:141/45--
c
-?S8 /
_ 866 E52 o E-20 /- /5'/
SV. /4 7
- P a &_
S% [52 I E-20!-!5/Cli.l49
-P383 86GE622.
E 2ol - is-( =;; IS I -t IS z 1
. l
_p'to 2.
BGG E 52 3 E-201-15t sH 200
-P ?o f SGS E G24 E-zo !- 13 \\ s+'. 20 2 -204
\\
.~ a 7
n..,
p.,,3. -* r -- W t.o j. zi,c,.y3..,
o k.)
--f~'n
- %f:552G.
E-20/ -l 5l gj.i 203
- I 9's 3 0.5) ? E / 7 E-20,'
' 5 ! W 2 i i i : l 2
-PC70 8 G 5 6:~ s 2 8 E-20!- { 5) sh'. 2 /4 f 2 / 5-i
/
KG,/- Pool 8(osE787 48-/m sp. / 6 5 m,M h
ih h
w."
m
.\\
$V e