ML20053B501

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-261/82-07.Corrective Actions:Procedure PT-2.13 Implemented 820323 Includes Refueling Water Storage Tank Outlet Valves & Satisfies Test Requirements of Tech Specs
ML20053B501
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/30/1982
From: Starkey R
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML20053B498 List:
References
RSEP-82-809, NUDOCS 8205280470
Download: ML20053B501 (3)


Text

s o

  • C h fj' M A8,3g H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT POST OFFICE BOX 790 HARTSVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29550 APR 301982 File No:

13510E Serial:

RSEP/82-809 Mr. James P. O'Reilly Regional Administrator USNRC Region II 101 Marietta Street, N. W.

Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 H. B. ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNIT NO. 2 DOCKET No. 50-261 LICENSE NO. DPR-23 RESPONSE TO I.E. INSPECTION REPORT NO. 82-07

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L) has received and reviewed the subject repo rt and provides the following response.

A.

Severity Level V Violation - IER-82-07-01 Technical Specification 4.5.2.6 requires that the refueling water storage tank (RWST) outlet valves shall be tested at each cold shutdown which extends more than 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> but not more often than once each quarter. These valves were last tested May 19, 1982.

Contrary to the above, the plant was placed in the cold shutdown mode for I

greater than 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> during August and November,1981, but the RWST outlet valves were not tested.

L.

Admission or Denial of Alleged Violation Carolina Power and Light acknowledges the above violation.

2.

Reason fot the Alleged Violation

(

The RUST outlet valve" were included in the inservice inspection (ISI) i Periodic Test (PT) 4 2.

PT-42 is required to be completed during each refueling outage and to be started, but not necessarily completed, during each cold shutdown which exceeds 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />.

l 8205280490

- Letter to Mr. James P. O'Reilly Serial:

RSEP/82-809 Page 2 of 3 PT-42 did not specifically address the Technical Specification require-ment to ensure that the RWST outlet valves were cycled quarterly if a cold shutdown exceeding 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> occurred in the quarter.

3.

Corrective Steps Ubich Has Been Taken and Results Achieved Since the unit was operating at power during and following this inspec-tion, the RWST outlet valves could not be immediately tested.

4.

Corrective Steps Which Uill Be Taken to Avoid Further Violation PT-2.13 was implemented on March 23, 1982.

This PT includes the RWST outlet valves and satisfies the testing requirements of Technical Specification 4.5.2.6.

PT-2.13 was included in the Plant's heatup and cooldown procedures to ensure it is performed during cold shutdown, if required.

5.

Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Full compliance was achieved on March 23, 1982.

B.

Severity Level V Viola tion - IER-82-07-02 Technical Specification 6.8.1 requires that written procedures be established and implemented that meet or exceed the requirements and recommendations of Appendix A of USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.33 dated November 3,1972. This Regulatory Guide requires implementing adequate procedures for Containment Leak Rate Tests.

Special Procedure-361 was written and approved to conduct the Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test (CILRT), including valve lineups to meet 10CFR50, Appendix J test requirements.

Contrary to the above, as of March 4,1982, adequate procedures had not been established or implemented for the CILRT, resulting in the nitrogen supply to accumulators, regulator (PCV-846), not being shut, the nitrogen supply to accumulators pressure indicator not being removed and the accumulator sample isolation valve (PS-989E) not being open.

These items resulted in about 1080 psig pressure being applied to the nitrogen supply to accumulators containment isolation valve (SI-855), which is contrary to Special Procedure-361, Prerequisite 5.27.

1.

Admission or Denial of the Alleged Violation Carolina Power and Light acknowledges the above violation.

Letter to Mr. James P. O'Reilly j

Serial:

RSEP/ 82-809 Page 3 of 3

+

i 2.

Reason For the Alleged Violation The contractor that wrote the ILRT procedure used features in the i

accompaning valve lineup to which the Operations ' personnel were not ac cus tomed.

This contributed to an operator performing the lineup on the nitrogen supply to the pressurizer relief valve (supply valves shut and pressure indicator removed) but mistakenly signing of f a similar step for the nitrogen supply to the accumulators.

Thus the nitrogen supply to the accumulator was not properly aligned.

The normally open accumulator sample isolation valve (PS-989E) was.

verified open and signed off in the valve lineup. There has been no explanation as to why this valve was later found shut.

I As stated in Inspection Report 82-09, "These items did not affect the ILRT leak rate results since they were corrected prior to the second 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> leak tate test".

3.

O)rrective Steps Which Have Been Taken and Results Achieved To ensure future procedures are prepared in a consistent fo rma t, a Procedure Format and Preparation Administrative Instruction was approved on March 31, 1982.

1 The Unit 2 Operating Supervisor discussed this occurrence with both the operator who improperly signed of f the ILRT valve lineup to ensure he understood the seriousness of his oversight, and the operator who verified the position of the accumulator sample iso-lation valve to emphasize the importance of accurate valve lineups.

4.

Corrective Steps Which Will Be Taken to Avoid Further Violation The immediate corrective actions taken were thorough and complete.

i No additional corrective actions are planned.

I 5.

Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Full compliance has been completed as of this date.

I If you have any questions concerning this response, please contact me.

Very truly yours, h-l l

R. B. Starkey, Jr.

General Manager H. B. Robinton SEG Plant CW/b s cc:

R. C. DeYoung 4

-,y,e

.e,_

yc

.-._.-,____---c

,v.

.,,,,.,m,

...