ML20052F150

Forwards Agenda for 820507 Site Visit to Complete Reviews of Hydrologic & Geotechnical Issues Evaluated by Contractors for SEP Integrated Assessment Program

ML20052F150
Person / Time
Site:	Oyster Creek
Issue date:	05/06/1982
From:	Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Fielder P JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
LSO5-82-05-003, LSO5-82-5-3, NUDOCS 8205120169
Download: ML20052F150 (4)

Text

y; q

g-,

• g g

4 w'

c DISTRIBUTION Docket May'6, 1982 NRC PDR Oocket No. 50-219 Read ng LS05-82-05-003 NSIC N

DCrutchfield s

q HSmith

/f

\\

hmbardo REcgypgD

.\\

Mr. P. B. Fiedler E-NATJ Vice President & Director - Oyster Creek OI&E IOO2h' Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ACRS (10)

=

i Post Office Box 388 SEPB 6

Forked River. New Jersey 08731 3

Dear Mr. Fiedler:

g

SUBJECT:

SITE VISIT TO THE OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION As discussed with Mr. M. Laggart of your staff, we will be conducting a site visit to the Oyster Creek Huclear Generating Station on May 7 1982. The purpose of this visit is to complete the reviews of the Hydrologic and Geotechnical issues evaluated by our contractors for the SEP Integrated Assessment Progran. The proposed agenda for the meeting is contained in the enclosure.

The attendees will be:

D. Chery J. Philip Sincerely.

Original signed by Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #5 Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

560/

Proposed Agenda cc w/ enclosure:

See next page gsg oE l

8205120169 820506 PDR ADOCK 05000219 P

PDR DL: ORB 5)

DL

1. 5 omcr >

au-m > A.9.mbarder.c D C..,..f,i e,l d om>....... D..

.%.L.....

1 I Nac ronu sis om nacu ma OFFICIAL RECORD COPY use.co. - - m-*o

' Mr. P. B. Fiedler May 6,1982

~

cc G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire Resident' Inspector Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge c/o U. S. NRC 1800 M Street', N. W.

Post Office Box 445 Washington, D. C.

20036 Forked River, New Jersey 08731 J. B. Lieberman, Esquire Commissioner Berlack, Israels & Lieberman New Jersey Department of Energy 26 Broadway 101 Commerce Street New York, New York 10004 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Ronald C. Haynes, Regional Administrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406 J..Knubel BWR Licensing Manager GPU Nuclear 100 Interplace Parkway Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Deputy Attorney General

~'

State of New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety

, 36 West State Street - CN 112 Trenton, New Jersey 08625

' Mayor Lacey Township 818 Lacey Road Fo.rke,4 River, New Jersey 08731 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II Office

"~~

ATTN:

Regional Radiation Representative r-

-26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10007 Licensing Supervisor

• Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Post Office Box 388 Forked River, New Jersey 08731 e

AGENDA HYDROLOGIC

& The reviewer 1has a need to s'ee all local site drainage features to:

i (a)

Form independent judgements of all varia.ble parameters used tn evaluate the capacity of sy., stems.

(b) Ascertain any changes that have occurred since original construction that rdght alter evaluation procedures and final results.

For example, portions of site drainage facilities may have been blocked by current construction or other modifications or may require evaluation of the current potential for blockage by debris, silt -

or ecuionen.

(c)

Identify potential flow paths, runoff patterns, control area.

storage areas and areas of cor.centrated flow.

'(d)

Check the role of " catch basins" in site dra,inage.

e Oyster Creek has a " dike" that divides the intake and discharge canals.

This dike r.ay be. inportant in the evaluation of Oyster Creek and

~

Forked P,iver flooding and also possible inclusion in Topic III-3.C.

Design details and infomation are limited.

e There are two dans on Oyster Creek.

These dans may be important in the ~

~

flood analysis.

e The features of Oyster Creek and Forked River that may affect backwater analyses cannot be obtained from a map (roughness, bridge conveyance and loss, constructions debris, etc).

e Features and the condition of the intake canal nay be inportant to. the revie..: of the safety related water supoly.

This canal is also included in Topic III-3.C.

.s Er.terior' access opening locations and elevations of sills dAr important e

i

'7 t6 our floo.d evaluations.

GE0 TECHNICAL

. e. First-hand knowledge of the " dike" that reparates-the intake and discharge canals is essential.

A determination of the-stability and the need for.-

continuing inspections of the dike is required.

At this time, ~ design deta'ils and other information on the dike provided by the licensee, are

'limited.

Y

e There Are two dams on Oyster: Creek.

Current information on these dams are limifed-and first-hand knowledge is essential.

One. of.the dams, has an.associat'ed pond that's'e'rves as a backup source for nucTear service water.

~

e. First-hand kno'wledge'.of the condition of the intake canal slopes is required.

~

This canal is included in Topics III-3.C and II-4.D.

i e The staff has no information on structural fill properties and compaction criteria for -fill.used adjacent to and for the support..of structures, i.f applicable.

This information is required for Topic II-4..F.

O Information on buried structures, where. located, and construction details are important and needed for inclusion in Topic II-4.F.

.i -

3 P

P

=

v k%

A

_