ML20050B631
| ML20050B631 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 07/09/1975 |
| From: | Nelson P NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | William Cahill CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20050B632 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8204070013 | |
| Download: ML20050B631 (4) | |
See also: IR 05000003/1975003
Text
_
.
,
.
.
.,
,
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
REGloN I
631 PARK AVENUE
UL 9
B75
KING oF PRUSSI A. PENNSYLVANI A 1940.
.
Consolidated Edison Company of
License Nos. DPR-5
New York, Inc.
-
Attention:
Mr. W. J. Cahill, Jr.
Inspection Nos.,50-3/.25 A
Vice President
(~50-247/75-02-
'
4 Irving Place
Docket Nos. 50-3
50-247
Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Mr. Panzarino of this office
on May 20-22, 1975 at Indian Point 1 and 2 of activities authorized by
NRC License Nos. DPR-5 and DPR-26 and to the discussions of our findings
held by Mr. Panzarino with Mr. Stein and other members of your staff at
the conclusion of the inspection.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the Office of
Inspection and Enforcement Inspection Report which is enclosed with this
j
letter. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examina-
tions of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel,
and observations by the inspector.
'
Our inspector also verified the steps you have taken to correct the item
of noncompliance brought to your attention in a letter dated April 2,
1975.
We have no further questions regarding your action at this time.
Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that one of your
activities was not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements,
as set forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix
A.
This item of noncompliance has been categorized into the levels as
described in our correspondence to you dated December 31, 1974.
This
notice is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201-6f the
NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations.
Although Section 2.201 requires you to submit to this office, within 20
days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement of explanation,
we note that this item'of noncompliance was corrected prior to the com-
pletion of our inspection, and therefore, no response with respect to
this matter is required.
otu%
E
!
!, P . M ,
-
.
- J4
g
- 7/6*19
8204070013 750705
PDR ADOCK 05000003
G
._
_
.
.
.
o
.
.
--
.
,
,
Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
.
,
_2-
Another activity appears to be a deviation from an appropriate code,
standard, or guide, as set forth in the Notice of Deviation, enclosed
herewith as Appendix A.
With respect to this deviation, please submit
to this office within twenty (20) days of your receipt of this notice, a
written statement'f explanation in reply, including, a description of
o
any steps that have been or will be taken to correct it, a description
of any steps that have been or will be taken to prevent recurrence, and
the date all corrective actions or preventative measures were or will be
completed.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part
2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the
enclosures will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
If this
report contains any information that you (or your contractor) believe to
be proprietary, it is necessary that you make a written application
within 20 days to this office to withhold such information from public
disclosure. Any such application must include a full statement of the
reasons on the basis of which it is claimed that the information is
proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information
identified in the application is contained in a separate part of the
document.
If we do not hear from you in this regard within the speci-
fied period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room.
We wish.to note that positive measures were taken by your radiation
protection staff during the March Unit 2 outage to maintain on-the-job
exposures as low as practicable.
These included assignment of an
,
individual to assume responsibility for keeping exposures ALAP; the
' setting of man-rem goals; special training of personnel; daily review of
accumulating exposure and corrective action when exposures deviated from
expected levels; and a review at completion with recommendations for
further reducing exposures during the next outage.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be
pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
O
d
Y
Paul R. Nelson, Chief
Radiological and Environmental
Protection Branch
.
-
.-
,
, ,
,
..
.
.
Consolidated Edison Company of Ntw York, Inc.
.
.
.
-3-
i
.
Enclosures:
1.
Appendix A, Notice of Violation
2.
Appendix B, Notice of Deviation
3.
IE:I Inspection Report Nos. 50-3/75-03
and 50-247/75-07
'
cc:
A. Kohler, Resident Construction Manager
W. Stein, Manager, Nuclear Power Generation Department
S. Cantone, Chief Engineer Unit 2
A. E. Upton, Esquire
J. M. Makepeace
A. Z. Roisman, Counsel for Citizens Committee for
Protection of the Environment (Without Report)
.
S
l
,
b
i
.
'
,
.-
m
-
,
-
.
,
.
.
,
'
bec:
IE Chief, FSLEB
IE:llQ (4 cys ltr, 5 cys report)
IE Files
Central Mail & Files
Directorate of Licensing (4 cys ltr,13 cys report)
Regulatory Standards (1 cy ltr, 3 cys report)
Local PDR
REG:I Reading Room
ELD
Region Directors (II, III, IV) (Report Only)
-State of New York
A. Z. Roisman, Counsel for Citizens Committee for
Protection of the Enviror. ment
.
-
k
.