ML20043B477
| ML20043B477 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 04/30/1990 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20043B474 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9005300079 | |
| Download: ML20043B477 (118) | |
Text
__- _- _ - -
$ k_,
I I I I I I I i ,i i i i i FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS APRIL, 1990 !
w - - - - ._
- ..h?Ai,.
Prepared by:
Production Engineering Division System Engineering
(
9005300079 900523
{DR ADOCK 03000283 PDC
=----_____--_--_-______________---__-___-_.
i \
I:
l'
'1 : .,
l OMAHA'PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT .
FORT.CALHOUN STATION f
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS !
3 i
r i
PREPARED BY:
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION -
k l SYSTEM ENGINEERING J
<g i
APRIL, 1990 I
r i l
k a
V
?
Pwaal sj & w an afhtaa...
L d a wu6m wnd & jud rrwnl. g ..
?
d w- a %, -617 W ...
d w a u>ay of Q...d w hung L job l
@ % lmd %, way %. 36 w I u a % cled, rwl da nes<di sj eximazal m, d w m aam 4 u>sdA uk an wa wnd % pub wnd sahnfock t
m ,ruajuaa % % + up. .
9 - 9. o'c _ ;
n ,
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ped.
Distribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
' Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'. . .- 1 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Adverse Trend Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ),
IndextoSafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)
-Indicators . . ................. 5 Index to Performance Indicator Graphs . . . . . . . 7 t
Performance Indicator Graphs, . . ... . . . . . ... 12 Escalated Enforcement History . . . , . . . . . . . 86 Significant Items of Interest . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Definitions .-. . . ... . . . . . . . . . . .'. ... 91 r
. Basis for Establishing 1989 Performance
-Indicator Goals.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
105-Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates . . . . 107 Production and-Operation Records. . . . . . . . . 109 L
t L
1.
Data Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . 113 r.
l l
I
DISTRIBUTION.
V. W. Anderson J. T, Gleason W. L. Neal R. L. Andrews L. V. Goldberg J. B._Newhouse '
W. R. Bateman D. C. Gorence M. W. Nichols K. L. Belek R. E. Gray C. W. Norris A. D. Bilau M. J. Guinn J. T. O'Connor !
B. H. Blome R. H. Guy W. W. Orr .
l C. N. Bloyd R. M. Hawkins L. L. Parent J. P. Bobba l M. C. Hendrickson T. L. Patterson {
C. J. Brunnert R. R. Henning G.-R. Peterson 1 M. W. Butt K. R. Henry 'R. L. Phelps R. H. Cagle J. B. Herman S. C. Presler i
C. A. Carlson G. J. Hill T. M. Reisdorff J. W. Chase K. C. Holthaus A. W. Richard G. R. Chatfield B. A. Howard T. J. Sandene A. G. Christensen. L. G. Huliska B. A. Schmidt l
- 0. J. Clayton R. L. Jaworski S. T. Schmitz R. P. Clemens R. A. Johansen F. C. Scofield R. G. Conner J. W.. Johnson B. A. Schmidt J. L. Connolley W. C. Jones L. G.~Sealock. !
G. M. Cook J. D. Kecy H. J. Sefick M. R. Core J. D. Keppler J. W. Shannon l P. J. Cotton D. D. Kloock R. W. Short
.S. R. Crites D. M. Kobunski C. F. Simmons D. W. Dale G. J. Krause E. L. Skaggs R. C. DeMeulmeester L. J. Kripal F. K. Smith R. D. DeYoung J. B. Kuhr R. L. Sorenson D. C. Dietz L. T. Kusek D. E. Spires D..E. Dirrim R. C. Learch K. E. Steele K. S. Dowdy R. E. Lewis W. Steele J. A. Drahota R. C. Liebentritt H. F. Sterba ,
.T. R. Dukarski C. J. Linden R. K. Stultz R..G. Ellis B. R. Livingston G. A. Teeple i R. G. Eurich J. M. L1fshult M. A. Tesar H. J.'Faulhaber J. H. MacKinnon P. L. Thompson M. A. Ferdig G. D. Mamoran J. W. Tills J. J. Fluehr J. W. Marcil D. R. Trausch V. H. Frahm N. L. Marfice P. R. Turner F. F. Franco D. J. Matthews J. M. Uhland H. K. Fraser J. M. Mattice C. F. Vanecek J. F. W. Friedrichsen T. J. McIvor L. P. Walling R. M. Fussell R. F. Mehaffey J. M. Waszak S. K. Gambhir R. A. Miser W. O. Weber J.'K .- Gasper K. J. Morris G..R. Williams '
W. G. Gates; D. C. Mueller S. J. Willrett M. O. Gautier R. J. Mueller P. A. Yager iV
r PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS -;
REPORT IMPROVEMENTS One indicator has been changed in the Maintenance Section.
The Procedural Noncomoliance Incidents (Maintenance) Indicator found on page 34 has been - - changed. This ind cator now shows the number of-identified Maintenance Incidents Reports (IR's) related to the use of-p(rocedures, includes -IR'sthe number caused of closed IR's by procedural related to theand noncompliance), usethe of procedures-number of-closed IR's caused by procedural noncompliance.'Previously, this indicator showed the number of identified IR's related to the use of procedures and the number of- closed IR's caused by procedural noncompliance. It should be noted taat the number of closed IR's related to the use of procedures and the number of closed IR's caused by procedural noncompliance will lag behind the number of identified IR's related to the use of Procedures. This reporting method is being used due to the process in which IR's receive their category codes.- i IR's receive their category codes (procedural noncompliance)- when they are being closed.
c 8
\
l'
.s 'l
- l. l 1
l' -I-L L
i l u
PURPOSE This program titled " Performance Indicators" is intended to provide -
selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's 1
personnel responsible -for optimizing unit performance. The-information is presented in a way that provides rea'dy identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information=can be used for assessing !
and. monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on. )
safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company l 1
goals or industry information. This information can be used for 1 comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation. 1 I
\
l l
3 l
l l
I 2-
. SCOPE i
In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, '
the' following guidelines were followed while implementing this program: >
L l
l Select the data which most effectively monitors Fort ;
L Calhoun's performance in key areas.
l- l L
Present the data in a straight forward graphical format using averaging and smoothing techniques.
l l
Include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison. 1 Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter.
This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow ,
comparison with industry averages where appropriate.
r l:
Comments.:and input are encouraged to ensure that this program ;
l.p is- tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report.
l l
L ADVERSE TREND REPORT The Adverse Trend Report explains the conditions under which certain indicators are showing adverse trends. An indicator that-is defined as an Adverse Trend is one in which the data represented for three months is showing deficiencies for that particular indicator.
Indicators which show an apparent three month decline, but are n2.t.
considered an adverse trend, will display an explanation which defines the reason why an adverse trend does not exist.
L Maintenance Overtime Indicat.qt - Page 33 The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours has been-increasing. This increase is due to increased maintenance activities associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.
Number of NPRDS Reoortable Failures Indicator - Page 37 1
L ,
As a result of reviewing outage failure data in April, the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures that were identified during February has been increasing. These increased failure discoveries are due to the increased activities and inspections on plant r equipment associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.
Enaineerino Assistance Reauest Priority Breakdown Indicator - Page 67 The number of En (EAR's) in each priority has been gineering Assistance increasing Requests .being due to resources applied to outage related work. This outage related work, includin Modification Requests (MR's) and Engineering Change Notices (ECN's)g,
, has been given a higher priority by Engineering than EAR's.
Overdue and Extended Corrective Action Reports Indicator - Page 83 PED overdue and extended Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) have been L increasing five -to reduced PED management attention on processing CAR's.and to the increasing number of CAR's being assigned to PED.
I E
Corrective Action Reports Current Status-Indicator - Page 84 The total number of PED open CAR's has been increasing due to reduced PED management attention on processing CAR's and to the increasing number of CAR's being assigned to PED.
I
\
1 SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROERAM (SEP)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS 1
The purpose of the Safety Enhancement-Program (SEP) Performance -Indicators ;
,pages' is to list - the indicators related to the SEP items with parameters 1 L that can be trended. .
SEP Reference Number 15 - Increase HPES and IR Accountability EAgt Through Use of Performance Indicators q Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . . 34 Total Skin and Clothing. Contaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate . ... . . . . . . . . . . 70 1
Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's . . . . . . . . . . 71 CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus 1 NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported . . . . . . . . . . 85 1 SEP Reference Number 20 - Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, Improved in Depth and Strengthened l
CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported ..........85 a
SEP Reference Number 21 - Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional l Inspections I CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus NRC Violations-Issued versus LER's Reported . . . . . . . . . . 85 SEP Reference Number 24 - Complete Staff Studies Staffing Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 73 SEP Reference Number 26 - Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for l Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling Injury Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 SEP Reference Number 36 - Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog !
Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 l
SEP Reference Number 41 - Develop and Implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 1
h
-SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS -
.(CONTINUED) i SEP Reference Number 44 - Compliance With and Use of Procedares Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . , . 34 SEP Reference Number 52 - Establish Supervisory Accountability for '
L Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 SEP Reference Number 54 - Complete Implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . . . . 18 L -Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . . 19 Total' Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 ;
Decontaminated Auxiliary Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 SEP Reference Number 58.- Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Security Incident Breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-. 51 Security System Failures .- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 L SEP Reference Number 60 - Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
. SEP Reference Number 61 - Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 SEP Reference Number 71 - Improve Controls over Temporary Modificatioas l Temporary Modifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 l
l l 8
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
-INDEX TO GRAPHS INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS Forced . Outage Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical. ... . . . . . 13 Unplanned Safety System Actuations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 i Gross Heat Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . ... . . . . 15 t
l Equivalent Availability Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
' Fuel' Reliability Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 ,
Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . . 19 '
Disabling Injury Frequency Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
'i h
l 1
1-n ,
I L
l l l
l E
i PERFORMANCE INDICATORS.
INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED)
OPERATIONS ]
Forced Outage Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical. . . . . . . . 13 Unplanned Safety System Actuations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Gros s Heat Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15 '
Equivalent Availability Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 i Fuel Reliability Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Daily Thermal Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours . . . . . . . . 22 <
Operations and Maintenance Budget. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Document Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 MAINTENANCE Diesel Generator Reliability (100 Demands) . . . . . . . . . . . 25
. Diesel Generator Reliability (20 Demands). . . . . . . . . .- . . 26 Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders . . . . . . . . . . . 27 i
Maintenance Work Order Breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Months Old . . . . . . . ... . 29 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments. . . . . . . . 32 h Maintenance Overtime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . .
. 34 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) . . . . . 35 L Number of Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 l
l 1
I 1
i
_ _ _ _ .l
1 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS I (CONTINUED) i MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED)
Number of Nuclear Plant Reliabilit Reportable Failures. . . . . . . .y Data. System (NPRDS)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 l Maintenance Effectiveness. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . . 19 Secondary System Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 I Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit . . . . 40 ;
Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits . . . . 41 In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service . . . . . . . . . . 42 I L
Hazardous Waste Produced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 1
Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 l Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 l 1
Decontaminated Auxiliary Building. . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . 46 l
Radiological Work Practices Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment. . 48 l
Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment . . 49 SECURITY Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Security Incident Breakdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 l Security System Failures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52- l MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES Amount'of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Spare Parts Inventory Value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 Spare Parts Issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
-9
P i
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX:TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) !
MATERIAL AND OUTSIDE SERVICES (CONTINUED)
Inventory Accuracy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 i Stockout Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 ,
Warehouse Rettlets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 Warehouse' Issues . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Warehouse Returns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 -
Material Requests Awaiting Approval. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Expedited Purchases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 [
Invoice Breakdown. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 Material Request Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 .
DESIGN ENGINEERING Outstanding Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 Temporary Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Engineering Assistance Request (EAR) Priority Breakdown. . . . . 67 L Engineering Change Notice Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ,
Disabling Injury' Frequency Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 HUMAN RESOURCES Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs. . . . . . . . . . . 71 Personnel Turnover Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Staffing Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 1 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS-(CONTINUED)
TRAINING AND OUALIFICATION SRO License Examination Pass Ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 R0 License Examination Pass Ratio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 License Candidate Exams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 l Hotlines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 Classroom (Instructor) Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78- l Total Hours of Student Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 OUALITY ASSURANCE Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours . . . . . . . . .
. 80 Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCV's) . . . . . 81 i Percent of CAR's Greater Than Six Months Old . . . . . . . . . . 82 Overdue and Extended Corrective Action Reports . . . . . . . . . 83 '
Corrective Action Reports Current Status . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus. . . . . . . 85 NRC Violations Issued-versus LERs Reported i
l L !
1 I
l e
1 l
l' 1
l -'
a
(.-
h
- Forced Outage Rate 6 e- Fort Calhoun- Goal .
-e- Industry Upper 10 Percentile ..
3 5-GOOD 1 4-4 R
a
't 3- -
-)
e 2- O'~~~O---'O----O-~~ ---O'-~ ~ O -~ ~ ~O'--- O -~ ~'O- ~ ~ ~O- ~ ~ O 1.4 0 0 I1-
'87 . '88 '89 MEy Jhn J AIg sip OIt NIv DIc Jan fib Mar Apr E -O 1989 1990 l
l FORCED OUTAGE RATE 3
The forced. outage rate was not reported for the month of April, 1990, due to the 1990 Refueling Outage.
1 The last - forced outage at Fort Calhoun .)
occurred in September of 1989. ^
The industry upper ten percentile value for r the forced outage rate is 0.25%.
l-The 1990 goal for forced outage rate is 2.4%
and is based on seven days of forced outage .i time. The basis for establishing the 1990 L performance goals can be found on page 105.
Adverse Trend: None L
4 1 l 1
i
- (
t
. 5- Reactor Scram' .
~
e- Fort Calhoun Goal d
-G- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-S 3 GOOD c
r a +
a 2 c i.,. I
,t
\.
!1 1-O-----G---- s- ---e---- e---- e ---- o ---- o ---- o --- -s ----s----e l.
1 L
I0 0 0
'86 '87 '88 '89 O C May C
Jun Jul C C C Sep Oct C .
Aug Feb Mar Apr
~
Nov Dec Jan 1989 1990 L ,
g UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL -
There were no unplanned : automatic reactor scrams. in April. It has been 1,398 days since the last unplanned- automatic reactor scram which. occurred.on July 2, 1986.
The 1990 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set-at 1.
l' The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plant '
performance in this area.
Adverse-Trend: None
s ,, , .,g 3
, -)
. 1
+-
Safety System Actuations ;
G- Fort Calhoun Goal )
-B- Industry Upper 10 Percentile l; A: 1 C- i t
h GOOD f
[ }. .
- l4 o '
n s
L
~ .
o.... e.. . 9....e....g....O ----0----G
'\
\
" \-
0 0 'O '
\
'87 '88 '89 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr-1989 1990-
-UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS There were no unplanned safety system i actuations during the month of April, '
1990.
The 1990 goal _ for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero. This is based or, past perf ormance goal at the Fort Calhoun Station.
The industry upper ten: percentile value for - the ~ number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. .t Adverse Trend: None 4
-- - -. . . .. .- - - . = - .- .
i IMonthly Gr8ss Heat Rate
- Year to Date Gross Heat Rate
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal
-B- Industry Upper 10 Percentile
, GOOD 10750-4 10520 B 10500-U
/
10270 K 1 H O- --
-O -- G --- G --G --- G --- G --- G ---G --- O --- G- ---O 10014 l IW10250-L 10000-l G-C O O O O' O G-O O O O 1
l 9750
'87 '88 '89
' Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec I 1990 l 1
f GROSS HEAT RATE The gross heat rate for the Fort
. Calhoun Station was reported as zero BTU /KWH. during the month of April due to the 1990 Refueling Outage.
The 1990 year to date gross heat rate ,
value is 10,459 BTV/KWH. The 1990 goal 1 is 10,200 BTU /KWH.
The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTU /KWH.
I Adverse Trends: None 1
, i q
l l Monthly ~EAF
~/\
- 12 Month Average EAF
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD L-
-G- Industry Upper 10 Percentile l d' .
100- '
1 77i 80- -# -O O 73
,l 6 '.
0_ _ __&_ _
-G_ " _G_ _--0_ _ -- $ g__ $ ___& _- e - _- G_ _ _ _O l
[ 60- ' , I li r l C -
.1
[:. >
e 1 l- n 40 '1 20-l 1
l 1
L 0
87 : '88 '89 May: Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 1989 1990 L
?
EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR- ._ i
'The Equivalent: Availability Factor (EAF) . was .
reported as. 0.0% 'for the month - of April.' The EAF was reported-as zero'due to the plant.being i shutdown for the'1990 Refueling Outage. q The 1990 EAF goal is 65.4% while the present 12 month average EAF for Fort Calhoun is 68.4%.
The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is >
82.5%.
Adverse Trends: None - The - reason for the trend is given above. '
t e
1
i
' 5-3 .++- Fuel Reliability Indicator s F -
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal- f 3
-B- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-n !
a-
- n
'3' .g 3, 0
u GOOD ;~
r i +.
e , ;
5 2- d b <'
r a
m
- 1- - G----G--- G- -G----G ---G---G---G----O----O ---G---C . 3 i
.13
'0 '" 0 n -g g g q. n -g --- g ---g--g _ g y '87 '88 - '89 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan lFeb Mar Apr L -1989 1990 l-i i
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI)>was not reported for i the month of April. The FRI is not: reported if the plant n.
^
is- below 85% -power operation. The Fort Calhoun Station :
. was , shutdown during. the month of April,1990, due -to the ,
1990 Refueling Outage. ;
The 1990 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram.
The fuel reliability indicator industry upper ten percentile value is 0.04 nanocuries/ gram. When the Fort -
, Calhoun Station was shutdown for refueling, it . was i L operating in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants p
for this indicator. l
- o. Adverse Trend: None 6 s .* -
.t iS' ,
Personnel Radiatien Exposure
- 388I 400 -G- Fort Calhoun Goal
-B- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3
,o GOOD 300- t 272 4,
_e-O ,
p . -O ,,, 4 ... o - & ~~~g
-R /
E 200- ?
M '
e e_._e-/ G G-G--G-G-G O-O-O '
l [
d ;
'93.4
,/
4 l100-/ ,0
' t l
-O'"'
487 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar - Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990-a i
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) i During April, 1990, 98.2 man-rem was recorded by TLD's : worn by personnel while working at the '
Fort Calhoun Station. The increase in personnel !
exposure was 'due ' to increased activity in .the - r Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) associated :with >
-the'1990 Refueling Outage. .
The monthly cumulative exposure goal for April . ,
was 203.7 man-rem while the actual cumulative r
exposure through April totaled 197.2 man-rem.
The personnel' radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 166 man-rem per unit per year. ,
a Adverse Trend: '
None - The reason for the trend is given above.
SEP 54 l'
t-
- L i
Nonthly Radioactive Waste Shipped 12500i
- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped .
-G- Fort Calhoun Gor.1 Industry Upper 10 Percentile -
10000-C -
u-h j GOOD-c 7500- 4 ,
6195 F e ,
- 4 54 t 5000- e----o----e---- e---e--- e----s---e----&--e-- -- e ---o - r g
?
o o e o I1722Ie
- o o o o e e e-o .
I 2500-l -
l h
'87 ~ '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov: Dec 1990 ,
i 1
5 y0LUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The - above graph shows the amount of low-level radioactive waste shipped off-site for disposal. The ~ table ' below lists the amount of waste actually- shipped off-site for -disposal plus the change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burtal.- J The volume of solid radioactive waste is (cubic-feet):
Amount Shipped ~1n April -
750.5 Amount ~in Temporary Storage -
232.5 i 1990 Cumulative Amount Shipped -
1558.6 1990 Goal -
5000.0 The industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit ;
per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of '
nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 l
j
i j .
,2-1990 Disabling Injury FrequCncy Rate r
_-N- 1989 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate ;
~
11.75- .a 5 Year Average Disabling Injury. Frequency Rate b -
O- Fort Calhoun Goal '
-1.5- O _ Industry Upper 10 Percentile 1.25- ;
- 1 R:
1a 'y GOOD l h t 4_
l '
.75-
}-
/
s 5- ' i N
&---- G- -- G----- -----G----- ----- O -- --- O -----G -----&--- --G -----O a a 3 4 0 .E '
m m m m m m m m
- Jan Feb Mar Apr May- Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov- Dec April 1990 L
1 DISABLING INJURY FREOUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
This indicator shows the current monthly disabling injury rate in
- column form. The 1989 disabling injury frequency rate and the Fort -
Calhoun Station - 5. year avera e disabling -injury frequency rate are -
also shown. There were zero c;isabling. injuries reported at the Fort Calhoun- Station 'in April. The total number of disabling injuries in 1990 is zero.
The11990- disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31% and
.was based on_one disabling injury occurring in 1990.
The industry up>er ten percentile disabling injury frequency rate is !
0%.'The Fort-Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten l percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator. _
The year end disabling injury frequency rates for 1987, 1988, and j 1989 were 0.6, 1.6, and 0.4 respectively. j Adverse Trend: None SEP 26 l
I
+ Thermal Output
- Technical Specification Limit
-s Fort Calhoun Goal 1500r - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
a M -
April 1990 dally THERMAL OUTPUT l The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal. The cross hatched area represents the difference between the maximum allowable operation and the actual plant operation.
The percent power operation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the month of April was reported as 0.0%. The 0.0% power operation of the plant was due to the plant being shutdown for the 1990 Refueling Outage.
Adverse Trend: None - The reason for the trend is ;
given above.
I l
l l
. +
~
n i
I 1- i
- Equipment' Forced Outt.ge Rate I
.8-
' 7
.6- GOOD R
a .
+
\ t -1
(, .4 c 1 i- .2-ll .13 a 0 0
'87 '88 '89- 0 han Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct' Nov Dec 1990 E0llIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES i P M 1000 CRITICAL HOLR$- '
i The equipment = forced outage hours y were unobtainable for the. month of. Aprii due -to the 1990 Refueling Outage.
The. last ' equipment- forced outage occurred in September of 1989 and was- due to a cable problem with the- resistive temperature .
detector onireactor coolant pump '
motor RC-3A..
Adverse Trend: None i
1
- Actual Operations Expenditures '
-X- Operations Budget .,
gl100-i .
1d 75- '
I lo 11 o l 50- l na .
sr '
s 25-0 -
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 40
- Actual Maintenance Expenditures Mf 30 -
l Maintenance Budget i
1d l$20-o1 na s r 10-s 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to t date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance-for the Fort Calhoun Station.
The budget year to date for Operations was 31.3 million dollars for April while the actual cumulative expenditures through April totaled 26.6 million dollars.
The budget year to date for Maintenance was 11.7 million dollars for April while the actual cumulative expeM'1res through April totaled 9.8 million dollars.
Adverse Trends: None
i i 500-
. . Documents Scheduled for Review t
, --X- Documents Reviewed
- Overdue Documents t 400-
~
ND N !
. "l300- \
bu em -
,8 i
r re
" 200-
\
,/
/\\ ;
fs '
s 100 , '
,X~ ~ g k'I'~x '
'" * ~ ~ . . .. . h..'%gY'
),. A 0
.- N ' -----*-~~~~~*,,< ,, h./ % >
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr ;
1989 1990 i
f DOClMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of biennial reviews completed during ,
i.he reporting month, the number of biennial reviews scheduled for the '
reporting month, and the number of biennial reviews that are overdue.
These document reviews are performed in house and include S>ecial Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procec ures , ;
Preventive Maintenance, and the Operating Manual. The documents included in the Operating Manual are Standing Orders, the Technical Data Book, the Radiological Emergency Response Plan, Emergency Plan Implementin Procedures,gAbnormal Procedures, Operating Operating Procecures, Procedures, Emergency Operating Operating Instructions the Radiological Protection Manual, the Chemistry Manual, the Fuel Management Manual, Surveillance Tests, and Calibration Procedures. ;
During - April there were 86 document reviews completed while 140 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of April, there were 51
- document reviews overdue. The overdue document reviews at the end of April consisted primarily of maintenance documents. ;
During the month of April there were 52 new or renamed documents i reviewed. These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again.in 1992.
Adverse Trend: None !
1
100-l Diesel Generator No. 1 98; --X- Diesel Generator No. 2
, e- Fort Calhoun Goal 96-e...... e..... g. ..s... ..q..... s .... .e......s. . .. . e .....e. . .. ..s..... e 94- . X-X X- X X,X
^
X- X X X P
e r 90-c -
t 88' n . g t
85-GOOD 84-82-80 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 1989 1990 DG RELIAllllTY LAST ,,00 )EMANDS Diesel generator D-1 has a 95 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands.
Diesel generator D-2 has a 94 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel generator reliabilit 0-1 meets this goal.y is 95%. Presently Adverse Trend None i
. 1 25- '
- Diesel Generator No. 1 .
-M- Diesel Generator No. 2 l G- Fort Calhoun Goal i r
100- l : : : l : l : : : :
I 95- E----- S----- O---+ ---- e-----e ---- e ---- e-- --- a -----e-----e -----e
.P r
[ .
/
," 90- m /
n ^ '
t :
GOOD 1 .
i 85-
{
I 80 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 1989 1990 .
l s
i DG RELIAE,lLITY I LAST 20 DEMANDS 1 Diesel generator D-1 has not had a failure in the last 20 demands on the unit. The J present reliability factor for D-1 is 100%
over the last 20 demands.
Diesel generator D-2 has had one failure in !
the last 20 demands. D-2 has a 95%
reliability factor over the last 20 demands.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the diesel !
generator reliability for the last 20' ;
demands is set at 95%. Diesel D-1 and diesel l D-2 presently meet this goal.
1 Adverse Trend None
{
I l
I
. - . ~ . , . . - , , . .
l 400- I E February 1990 i i E March 1990 l L_j April 1990 0 300 l l 5 . [
a 0 ;
l 200-l 9 i 0 -
I d
0 0-3 3-6 6-9
[ 9-12 >12
~
Age in Months l AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-0UTAGE)
This indicator shows the age of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders (MWO's) remaining open at the end of the reporting .
month.
Adverse Trend: None i
+ - , . - . - - _ _ . . . _ . _ _ . _ . - - . - .r- ,_ _ . , ........e.,,- ..,,..,..-3 _._,,7 , y-.,,--__-.r. r - - '
i E February 1990 E March 1990 -
l I IApril 1990 ;
400-l .
l i
200-0- -
Total Open Total Open Open Open MW0s Open Sa d
ety High !
-MW0s > 3 Months Safety Related '
Old Related Priority MW0s Mwos MW0s a 3 Months Old l
1 MAINTE)A>CE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CIM ECTIVE NON-0UTAGE)
This indicator shows the total number of corrective non-outage MWO's remaining open at the l end of the reporting month, along with a I
breakdown by several key categories.
Adverse Trendi None l
t i
- C;rrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old !
+ Industry Upper Quartile '
80-l k
)
60-t-
r ce 40 C O O- O v
/ 0 0 0 O- - O ~~O O .
n t .
GOOD l 20- t i
t 0
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Du Jan Feb Mar Apr .
1989 1990 ;
CORRECTIVE 4AINTENU CE BACKLOG GREATER THAF 3 >04THS OLD (NON-00 TAI 3E.)
y This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders
-)
that are preater than three months old at the end ;
of the reporting month, t The percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at the end of April was reported as 58.1%
The industry upper quartile value for corrective ,
maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is .
45.8%. :
Adverse Trend None ;
r e
)
n 1
- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance !
+- Industry Upper Quartile J 90- O- Fort Calhoun Goal l 80- 1 70-P 60-g----Q-----p --- ,g--- g---- --- _-g ---- -- g ---- g _,- g e '
n 50-t ,
40- ^
GOOD 30- >
20 '
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 1989 1990 i RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TTAL MAINTENANCE I (NON-00TAGQ .l The ratio of preventive to total maintenance 3 indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage l preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. a The ratio of preventive to total maintenance at the ,
Fort Calhoun Station decreased to 72.9% in April.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%.
u The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of nuclear power plants in this area. .'
i Adverse Trend None SEP 41 ;
- Preventive Maint; nance Items Overdue !
20- + Industry Upper Quartile !
G- Fort Calhoun Goal !'
o .
15- '
L i
- i. p .
, e GOOD !
- r 1 1
[ c 10- +
. .. e 2
- n. ,
t . ;
e ,
l.
l S-i
@......G.....$ Q .@.. . .. .@_.. .. $ .. .. . @n . .$ o l 0
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 1989 1990 1 ,
t PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE ,
(
The purpose of this indicator is- to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items .
l overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive :
maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and :
perform preventive maintenance tasks as programs require. ,
The preventive maintenance items overdue value was not i reported for the months of February, March, and April 1990, '
due to the problems involved with scheduling PM activities. !
These problems stem from the fact that the system window !
concept and P/2 scheduling do not follow the normal PM ;
scheduling program. Some PM activities may not be performed, as scheduled, because the system window may not be open. ;
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items overdue. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 i
L
W Total Control Roon Instruments Out-of-Service !
E Out-of-Service Instruments Added During the Month 35- 1 Iout of Service Instruments Corrected During the Month
-O Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out-of-Service Instruments ;
30 O- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments !
(
25- ,
GOOD I 20- + .
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr i 1989 1990 tibB ER Or 0JT-0F-SERVICE C0kT 10L it00M1 (STRUMENTS This indicator shows the total number of out-of-service control room o
instruments at the end of the reporting month, the number of l L out-of-service control room instruments that were corrected during '
the reporting month, and the number of control room instruments that were added to the out-of-service control room instruments list during the reporting month.
i There was a total of 23 out-of-service control room instruments at '
the end of April. During the mc. nth of April, 18 out-of-service )
instruments were corrected and 20 instruments were added to the l out-of-service instruments list. The increases occurring in the nunber of out-of-service control room instruments has been due to the 1 high number of control room instrument calibrations being performed during the 1990 Refueling Outage.
The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 7 out-of-service control room instruments. The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of-service control room instruments is 7.
Adverse Trendt None - The reason for the trend is given above.
1
t O
- Maintenance Overtime
-M- 12 Month Average >
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal '
60- + '
g..... c ;
P e ..','
( 40 '
e &---- C+ ---- G ----- G -----& ---- & ---- G----- G ----- O',,,-
n ;
t 20- '
s .
0
- May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr ,
1989 1990 ,
i MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired maintenance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue. !
The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 36.0% during the month of April, 1990.
The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 20.0%.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the percent of maintenance overtime hours worked has been set at 35% for non-outage months and 50% for outage months.
Adverne Trend: The percent of overtime hours with respect to norma' hours has been increasing. This increase is due to increased maintenance activities associated with the 1990 :
Refueling Outage.
)
20- R Open IR's Relat;d to the Use of Prce:dures (Maint nance)
ClosedIR'sRelatedtotheUseofProcedures(Maintenance)
E Procedural Noncompliance IR's (Maintenance)
N 15-u O
b l r
j 0
o 10- . ]
f 9 i
i 1
5 0--
5-44 44 33 3 33 12 2 2 2 2_ 2 1 1 11 1 1 0-May 0
Jun Jul Aug Sep 0
Oct 0
Nov 0 000 00 E_ hApr Dec Jan Feb Mar 1 1989 1990 l L
l PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIA)CE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANC )
The Procedural Noncompliance Incidents Maintenance) Indicator has been changed. This ,
l, ndicator now shows the number of identified Maintenance Incidents Reports (IR's) that are j related to the use of procedures, the number of l closed IR's that are related to the use of procedures (includes IR's that were caused by procedural noncompliance), and the number of closed IR's that were caused by procedural noncompliance.
It should be noted that the second and third columns will lag behind the first column until the IR's are closed. This reporting method is due to the process in which IR's receive category codes. -
IR's receive their category codes when they are-closed.
Adverse Trend None SEP 15 & 44 34-1
-r- , , , , ,, - -w, .,e e , - , , e,ww,-
900- --
- Open MWO's G- Fort Calhoun Goal 800-o 700-Nf -
u mM bW 600- O----- G - -
G---- G ----O ---- G ----G ---- + ---- G---- G ---- O e0 -
r' ,
500- _
V 400-300 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990 l MADTENANCE WORK OFDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVENON0UTAGEMAINTENANCE) 4
' This indicator shows the number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are open 1
at the end of the reporting month.
At the end of April, 1990, there were 513 I corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open.
The goal for this indicator is to have less than i 600 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders l
remaining open. ,
Adverse Trend None SEP 36 i
I
[ ,. .
5-Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's 4-N 3-u a
b
- e r 2-1I a
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 1989 1990 l l l l- l I
UMBER OF MISSED SURVEll.ANC E TES"S :
ll!SULT11G IN LICENSEE EV HT tEPOR"$
i This indicator shows the number of missed i Surveillance Tests (ST's) that result in ,
i Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during the
) reporting month.
During the month of April,1990, there were ,
no missed ST's that resulted in LER's. :
Adverse Trend None SEP 60 & 61 i I
i l
,. i
i 35 i I ITotal NPRDS Component Failures l 30' E Confirmed NPRDS Component failures <
25-N uI '
[$20-ei .
ru r 15- l e'
. i I
gs -
1 0- -
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr i 1989 1990 l NUMBER OF NUCLEAF' PLANT FELIABILITY DATA SYSTM (NPR )S) '
REPORTABLE FAILURES This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS !
com)onent failures and the number of confirmed NPR X component failures. The total number of !
NPRL., component failures is based upon the number '
of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS com>onent failures is based upon the number of f a' lure reports that have been accepted by INPO. The difference of these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO. I During April, 1990, there was a total of 2 confirmed NPRDS component failures.
Adverse Trend: As a result of reviewing outage I f ai' ure data in A)ril, the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures that were discovered 1990 during increase February,ilures, in fa has been is due toincreasing.
the increasedThis discoveries of NPRDS component failures during the 1990 Refueling Outage.
l
l 15- + Components With More Than One Failure '
-M- Components With More Than Two Failures N ,
u '
, O _ _
r 10- . .
o- ,
f ;
C i o-O P '
o 5- K y<, ;
," ,,x,, \
\ <
x. . . . . u. . .. . .x . . . . . x !
n t -
x......x ' 'x ,' '. 'g' '
\ s. M -
t 0 .
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr ['
1989 1990 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed !
following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory l Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of ;
Operational Data (NRC/AE00). The NRC/AEOD is currently :
developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS)componentfailures, l
This indicator shows the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last twelve months and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures during the last twelve months. The number of NPRDS (
components with more than two failures in a twelve-month '
period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance.
1 During April,1990, there were 9 NPRDS components with more '
than one f ailure and 4 NPRDS components with than two i failures. The tag numbers of the 4 NPRDS components with J more than two failures in the last twelve include: CH.1A, CH-1B, CH>10, and CH-26A.
Adverse Trends None i I
,,-,--.-,.,--.n-, , , , , - . .
I
- Secondary Systa CPI :
+- Sec ndary System CPI Limit 5- [
4- Industry Upper Quartile 6 5
}. .p...p...p...+...+....+....+.....+...+.....+...p....+ ;
GOOD f
4,
.38 I .5-i O-4 O O O O G ---o --0 --+ -- + ---+
'88 '89 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar ,
1989 1990 1000
- Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines 757.7 800-l '
H GOOD I
- 359 r 400- 4' 5
l .
200-l n
W
'87 '88 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar :
1989 1990 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chenistry Performance Index (CPI), is calculated using three parameters. The t1ree parameters used include; a cation conductivit in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown,y and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen.
The CPI was not reported for the month of March due to the 1990 Refueling Outage. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is 0.20 The bottom graph, f ours Chemistrv is outs'de Owners Guidelines, tracks the total hours od 13 parameters exceeting guidelines during power operation. The number of hours outside owners group guidelines was not reported for the month of March due to the 1990 Refueling Outage.
The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.
Adverse Trends: None
i 10-
- Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit l
?
8-i I
P 6- !
I GOOD
- n
+ t i
t 4- ,
t 1.9 2-0 0
'88 '89 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mai 1989 1990 Pf 19 ARY SYSTEM CaENISTRY PERC E F 0F HOURS OL r OF LIMIT '
The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.
The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was not reported for the i month of March due to the 1990 Refueling Outage.100% equates to all six parameters l being out of limit for the month. 1 Adverse Trend None
- l. !
l l.
l =.
l i
- Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit H) Industry Upper Quartile 40-GOOD
+
30-H o
u 20 -
r s
10-0 0 C O O O O O O O O O Os
'88 '89 Apr May Jun du'l kug Sep Oct Nov De'c fan F'eb M r 1989 1990 AUXILIARY SYSTEM JCCW) CHEM:STRY HOURS OUTSID E$"ATION LIM: TS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. -The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting period due to the L time needed for data collection and l evaluation of the chemistry data for the l station.
The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was not reporting for the unth of March. During the month of March, 1990, the CCW system was drained for repairs.
The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.
AdverseTrenj: None l
l L l
P 1 Number of Out-of-Service Instruments 25 G- Fort Calhoun Goal :
20-I .
Nn - -
~
uM' us -- -
,z.
a t 15-4* . . .' ' '
.s i
L em b 7 i .
b^ .
'~
^ ' ^:
l ey ra j.;a ~l e 10-on "
ft .
. . . l; t .
,r s u;ll. . j -]
- - { ' '. . ;. . j pp 5- y ] .
- ?~
. . .] f : j f.
- ] f j
"-l n l l ---&----D
.. o < 1.. . . .
.. . ' ;, m . .
,Y . ?Q_ ] .:.'.- :. ; 37_
~
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990 l
IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INETRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVIC1 This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end of the reporting month.
The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondar S Sampling System (PAS ). ystem and the Post Accident At the end of April there were a total of 16 in-line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service. Eleven of these instruments were from the Secondary System and five were from PASS.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service is 3.
Adverse Vrend None l
1
Waste Oil '
E Non-Halogenated Hazardous Waste 10 @ - E Halogenated Hazardous Waste I IOther Hazardous Waste ;
I K 8000- t 10 if .
o '
g W 6000-7a , >
as . -
]
t a ;
s' 4000- I
. I
, 2000-I g ;
i oIa._...__
May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan I___
Feb l
Mar Apr ,
1989 1990 ,
t i
HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED
- This indicator shows the amount of waste oil, non halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. r Ouring the month of April, 3,606.8 kilograms
) of waste oil was procuced, 0.0 kilograms of i l-non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced, l
45.3 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilo .'
hazardous waste was produced.The grams amountof other of ;
waste oil that was produced during the month of April was high due to the draining of several tanks associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. '
Adverse Trendt None - The reason for the trend concerning the amount of waste oil produced is given above.
I k
- - , _ , , - -, , -e .- , . . . , - - - w - --n. ,
c 5000-L.JMonth '
E Quarter OPPD l Year Limit '
4000-3000- ,
o i R , i i
E N '
2000-1 l
l 1000-p -
0----- -
April 1990 I
MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSUR1 During : April, 1990 an individual accumulated 1,351 mrem which was the highest individual exposure for the month.
The - maximum individual exposure to date for the second quarter of 1990 has been 1,351 mRes.
The maximum individual exposure to date for 1990 was 2,016 mrem. 1 l
The high maximum individual ex>osure reported for the month of April, the first quarter of 1990, and the 1990 year to i date value was due to increased activities in the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.
The maximum accumulated 1989 individual exposure was 1,165 mrem, received by a Health Physicist. '
The DPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year. I Adverse Trend: None - The reason for. the trend is given
-above.
- 44-p- ._. , y _ . ,,,--
e- - . . , , , - . - , . . - - , y.~.,-- .-- m--_..___,,,,,,-,.--_,w__.
E Monthly Contaminations 500-
- Cumulative Contaminations l
G- Fort Calhoun Goal l
400-4- Industry Upper Quartile 357 P e ;
r s 300-o GOOD I n
n 4 -
e 200- i 157 I o.... e .. . .e. . ... e ....e...s.. .g....e. ...O --- G--- -O I1GD-O G---O O O O O-4-0
'88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ,
1990 .
TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS :
l There was a tottl of 68 skin and clothin contaminations ,
i reported for the Fort Calhoun Station during A 11, 1990. There has been a total of 174 skin and clothing contaminations so far in 1990. The high number of skin and clothing contaminations which occurred during the months of March and April,1990, was related to increased activity in the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA)duringthe1990RefuelingOutage.
There was a total of 157 skin and. clothing contaminations in 1989.
i The 1990 goal for skin and clothing is 150 contaminations. This 1990 oal of 150 contaminations includes a Fort Calhoun goal of 23 sk n contaminaticns.
The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.
Adverse Trend: None - The reason for the trend is given above.
SEP 15 & 54 1
%s ,
-'N !
l i
l
- Decontaminated Auxiliary Building 100-p e
(
[
e 60-
' {
n -
t 40-(
^ j
, GOOD I n l May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr ;
l- 1989 1990 l
l t
DECONTAMINATED AUXILI ARY BUllpjg l
This graph shows the percentage of the '
l auxiliar buildin which is decontaminated ,
(clean) ased on t e total square footage.
As of April 30, IMO, 74.8% of the total square footage of the auxiliary building was ,
decontaminated. The overall decrease in the percentage of the auxiliary building which was decontaminated was due to increased <
activity in the auxiliary building ;
associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 i
i i
.n, . ., . . . - . . - - . . , ., . . - , - ,- . . , , . - -
s go. 1 E Number of Identified PRWP's l
n !
v 15 O
b fJ e .
r y10-P !
R W )1 P
5-s 2 2 O !
D.
!. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug r Sep Oct Nov Dec ,
l 1990 '
RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM i L' .
The Radiological Work Practices Program i Indicator shows the number of Poor L Radiological Work Practices (PRWP's) which l- were identified during the reporting month.
l The number of PRWP's which are identified ;
each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor ,
accountability for their workers' !
radiological performance, j
During the month of April 1990, 7 PRWP's were identified. The hi h , number of PRWP's )
was due to- increase activit in the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) yassociated with_the 1990 Refueling Outage.
L Adverse Trend None SEP 52 y
i 1.
1
)
l I~l Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged i
- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged !
+O- Cumulative Goal 785 800-GOOD -
+ l C 600-u !
r -
e 432 If s 400-200 G---- O --- G----G --- G---G --- G ---G --- O ---GA-0 ' ' '- ' '
'87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec '
1989 GASEOUS RA)l0AC"IVE WASTE BEING- -
1)ISCHARGE )TO"HE ENVIRONMEN' The gaseous radioactive waste _ being '
dischstged to the environment is shown for 1989. A total of 164.4 curies have been !
released to the environment. from January throullh December - of 1989. The Fort Calhoun i Stat'on goal is 145 curies for this indicator. ;
The gaseous radioactive waste being i discharged to the environment is calculated
[ every s'x months. .
?
Adverse Trendt None '
l' l
e
{
l-L i
l L_IMonthly Radienctive Liquid Discharged I
- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged [
G- Cumulative Goal i 228 231 400-180 C 300 > ++- O - O -6 + + -& -G-G- O l u -
r -
1 200- GOOD
.. l _. l + ,
100- ,
0 ' 'I I- ' ' ' '
'86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec i 1989 '
2500- !
- o
' 3 i
h 2000-O u,G 150 } i 5
1 8 1000-1 l r
' "o d 1 n 500-5 l s
0 ' '
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ,
! 1989 LIOUID RAL10 ACTIVE FASTE BEING I DISCHARG E ) TO THE E WIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment l i
is shown for 1989. The liquid radioactive waste that was '
discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 149.1 curies from January through December 1989. l The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1989 is 320 curies.
The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste L that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks.
The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks totaled 1.2 million gallons from January through December, 1989.
The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment- i is calculated every six months. !
4 Adverse Trend: None I
l 35-Nember of Loggable/ Reportable Incidents f
. N 30-
=u l O i
, 25
.r . ;
1 o 20-f !
l '
n 15- ;
C
- I i ;
d 10-e i
n .
t s 5-1 1 !
0 __ 0 _ _ . _ .. . m m .". .. .. _ " . . . 0 _ __ . _ l
! LDV Badges Escort System Key Access i
Failures Control Control l March 1990 !
l LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) !
The Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security)
Indicator shows the total number of l loggable/ reportable incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's , security badges.
security key control, escorting), access control, and -1 '
security system failures for the reporting month.
the month of A)ril, 1990, there were 32 During loggable / reportable incicents identified compared to 44 loggable/ reportable incidents the previous month.
This decline is a direct result of concentrated i efforts in the area of system f ailures . and 1 l lost / unattended security badges. Increased emphasis i l
on the proper control of security badges by plant '
personnel is continuing.
l Adverse Trend None SEP 58 1
l l
.~ __ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___- _ _. .
-)
- A Lic1nsee Designated Vehicles (LDV's) ,
t M Security Badges .
L R Security Key Control L
Et:orting i:!:!:: Access Control Security System Failures s %
1
/ sBadges 31%
g
\
\
System Failures 63%
7 u
= 2 ... ...
L y : cort 3%
h 1 _'g ,
SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN The Security Incident Breakdown Indicator shows the percentage of -incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month. These items include: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's), security badges, security key , control, escorting, access control, and security system failures.
'~ -
Security Items Number of Incidents APR 1990 MAR 1990 LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LDV's) 0 1.
Security Badges 10 13 Security Key Control 1 0 Escorting 1 1 Access Control 0 0 Security System Failures "
20 29 Total 32 44 p Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 e i e
.m
)
.. u i C l
- b. 1 e 10- l r;
h o 8
- f. . .
1 F
-a
- 1 -
- 1. 5- 5
-u.
r n =e 3- !
-s ,
2 2 0 0 Alarm System CCTV -Computer Terminal Door j Card Reader SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES The Security - System Failures Indicator shows the number of -
incidents concerning. the following - items for the reporting month. These items include: alarm system' failures. CCTV
' failures, security computer failures, . terminal failures, ' door-equipment' failures, and card reader failures.s System Failures Number of Incidents APR 90 MAR 90 ,
Alarm Systems 8 13 CCTV' 3 0 Computer 2 2 Terminal ) 2 5 L Door Equipment 5 8 Card Reader 0 1 Total 20 29 Adverse Trend:' None SEP 58 L
1
'.1: .l
H ;
l_
L ,
15-
- Amount of Work'On Hold Awaiting Parts !
g 12-i GOOD 1
-P 9
- e + t
- r- ;
C- - '
- . e ,
n
- t 6- !
L 6
- . 3- !
'O -
May Jun Jul- Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 1989 1990 t
v AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS' .
[
(NON-0UTAGE)
This- procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non-outage, maintenance
+
items that are on hold awaiting parts, to .
the' total amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items, expressed as a l- percentage.
The percentage of work on hold awaiting parts decreased to 5.7% in April.
As of April 30, 1990, there were a total of 1,142 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 65 of these items on hold awaiting parts. >
Adverse Trend: None g
l ',.
1 l
l'
- j
. - , . t
'E 10-
- Spare Parts Inventory Value t
i M'
g.
o.
,[ 8- I r
" D' 7 g
a-r-
l' -s- 6-l 1
5 ,
i- .
-May . Jun Jul Aug 'Sep Oct Nov Dec- Jan Feb Mar Apr i 1989 1990 i
F
- R&RE ' PARTS INVENTORY VALUE u
The spare parts inventory value at the Fort
- Calhoun hation at the end of April,1990 was:. reported as $8,258,335.
I !
Adverse TeenJ: None l
l:
l-l ..
l l
l' l;p V:
l~
l - ,
I .
500- ,
T l
h-
. - Spare Parts Issued o P uI 400-2 L - s. ,
p .
a -
u n- ,
l: d: 300- l L. - s- -
o f' 200- -
l D
l :- it 1 <
1 '100-a r -
O May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 1989 1990 l
s SPARE PARTS ISSUED i The :value of the spare parts issued during
-April, 1990, totaled $324,057.
Adverse-Trendt None t
1.
1 n
. ~ ~ ~
E Inventory Accuracy 100-1 80- i I
P 7 60-i c '
y . -
n t 40-20-0 -
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun ' Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained- in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month.
During April, 435 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 435 line items counted 23 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of April was reported as 94.7%.
Adverse Trend: None l
l l
i 15-
.e- Pick Tickets With Parts Not Available -
s- Pick Tickets With-Zero Quantity.'On Hand ,
P~ j P1 10-ec !
rk g i
C 6, . ,'T c ,
ni "
1
- tc '
k --
o e 5-
- ft s-p 0
$ .... s... -& ----
Jan Feb . Mar- -Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct -Nov Dec ;
i 1990 r
l-STOCK 00T RATE I 4
. This indicator shows the sercentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated w< th no parts ' available and \ i 1-the number of Pick Tickets generated that the MIS ;
computer system showed a sufficient parts quantity. i but no 1 arts - were available compared to the total
. number of Pick Tickets generated during' the reporting j month. ~
During the month of- April, a total of 1,818 Pick I Tickets were generated. Of the 1,818 Pick : Tickets generated,- 21Ewere generated with no parts available and 12 Pick Tickets were generated with the MIS t computer system showing a sufficient supply of parts but no. parts were available.
Adverse Trend: None l
_ _ _ - - -. ~
1500.' C Total Receipts s
6- Spare Parts Receipts
-Er- Standard Stores Receipts '
1200- - - Direct Charge Receipts -
N 'R
=u e; 900-Gc :
b
,e .
i _' -
J 7:p 600-o ,tT +
f -
.[
'300- jD p
Q.{ -&
g..-
0
-Feb Mar Apr - May Jun Jul Aug Sep' Oct Nov Dec- Jan '
1990 1991.
WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS. 1 This . indicator 'shows the total number of I
- warehouse receipts, ' the number of spare parts I
receipts,- the number of standard stores receipts, .I and the number of direct charge, receipts-.during-the reporting month.
L During _ April the warehouse received- a total of 1,062 receipts.
184 - were spare: pOf_
arts - the 300 receipts; ' 1,062 were- receipts standard received, stores receipts, and 578 were . direct charge i l
receipts. l E Adverse Trend: None l
.s
L4000- -e- Total Issues e Spare Parts Issues-
- l. -O- Standard Stores Issues .
-M- Direct Charge Issues 3000-L. -N-G
- u I-l
.g
+
hs-5' e 2000-Ir u-e s- A L
Mf -
~
\N G- ----e .,
- p. 1000-l
,b ..
i p ,
O Feb- Mar Apr May- Jun Jul Aug Sep. 0ct Nov Dec Jan t 1990 1991.
i e
t b
l_
WAREHOUSE ISSUES
- f-This indicator shows the total number of warehouse issues, the number of-spare
, of standard stores issues, parts andissues, the. number the number direct charge issues for the reporting month.
During April the warehouse completed a total of 2,240 issues. Of. the 2,240 issues completed, 606 were spare parts issues,- 1,217 were standard stores issues, and.417 were direct charge issues.
Adverse Trend: None
?
?
l 1
l l
l
e ' 35-
-B- Total- Returns -
. 6- Spare Parts Returns ;
30- ' O- Standard Stores Returns t
-M- Direct Charge Returns t
m T ' ' 25- '
. Po et. -
- ' U:l 20-
. e. ,
n !' v t s. 15- '
s- :
.ou- -
f e -- '
.s- 10-j b i t
5-A ,,~, # ,// ,o d '
- G ~ '9 - .
0 X X X Feb' Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan .t
-1990 1991 -+
t'N i
WAREHOUSE RETURNS o !
-.The. Warehouse: Returns' Indicator shows th' e percentage of .
.the total number of warehouse . returns,. the number of -
I
. spare parts returns, the number of standard stores- '
returns, - and :.the number of direct charge returns '
-compared to. the total number of warehouse issues during the reporting month.
- During the month of April there were a - total of 2,240 warehouse issues. Of the 2,240 . issues, there were 290 totai returns. These returns consisted of 186 spare '
parts returns, 104 standard stores returns, and zero direct charge returns.
Adverse Trend: None
.t k
f
?
50- L_J Material Requests Awaiting Approval J E Material. Management Division Contacted to Order t
" 40-t e .
Nr s
- " , 30-b1 e - :
,' 20-10 0 A February 1990 March 1990 April 1990 !
MATERIAL RE00ESTS AWAITING APPROVAL This indicator shows ~the total number of material requests - awaiting approval at the end of the reporting month - and the total number of materials requests in which the Material t Management Division (M40) has been contacted to order material at the end of the reporting month.
At the end of April, 9 material- requests were awaiting approval and zero material requests ,
had been given to M(D to order material.
Adverse Trend: None r
l 2- '
- Percentage of Total Purchases that are Expedited l- !
c 1.5-l
! P. !
e ,
.r c 1-
n ?
t -
+
i
.5-t 0
Jan Feb : Mar Apr. May Jun- Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec-1990 L l 5 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited _ purchases compared to the. total ,
number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.. r During April, there was a total of 401 '
purchase orders generated. Of the 401 purchase orders generated, there .was a total of 3 expedited purchases.
Adverse Trend: None 1
1
y R February 1990 E March 1990 E April 1990
-i '
.60-N u' l - <
a" I
'bV
- e' 40-rc ~
ne 1 l
f .5 20-I i
0- 1 Shelf Life CQE Miscellaneous
]\
INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of invoices that are on- hold at the end of the reporting month due to shelf life, j
CQE, and miscellaneous reasons.
i At the end of April, 10 invoices were on I hold due to shelf life reasons, 48 !
invoices were on hold due to CQE reasons, and 41 invoices were on hold due to miscellaneous reasons.
Adverse Trend: None r
1
n 100a
- PercIntage of Material Requests for-Issues with the Request Date the same as the Need Date 80-i
-l 60-r
- c -
e .
n : 40-t ,
20-
. t O
Jan Feb Mar Apr May' Jun -Jul Aug Sep Oct_ Nov Dec 1990 ,
'l MATERIAL RE00EST PLANNING This indicator shows the percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with their-request date the same as their need date compared to the- total number of MR's for issues for the reporting month. ]
During the month of : April, a total 'of 1,714 MR's for issues were received by the.
warehouse. Of the 1,714 total MR's received
'l by the warehouse,1,183 MR's were for issues with their request date the same as their need date.
Adverse Trend: None l
l 1
l
. . . u
00-
- Total Modification Packages Open I
l r 600-
- 500-l 425 425 _
.384 400- '
300-200 l '87 '88' '89 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 1
1989 1990-OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The total number of outstanding modifications I decreased by 12 during the month of April.
CATEGORY FEB 90 MAR 90 APR 90 t
Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 66 , 63 64 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 113 110 104 Design' Engr. Backlog 0 0 0
~
Design Engr. In Progress 99 97 93 Construction Backlog /In Progress 66 72 71 Desion Enor. Uodate Backloa/In Proaress & J J Total 413 392 380 As of the end of April, 26 additional modification requests have l been issued this year and 8 modification requests have been l
~
cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Rev.iew Committee (NPRC) has i completed 58 backlog modification request reviews this year. The l
Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 52 backlog '
modification request reviews this year. The number of reviews I completed is high due to the fact that some of these requests were reviewed more than once. l Adverse Trend: None l
,J
- Temporary Electrical Modifications 100- -b- Temporary Mechanical Modifications M -
- Total Temporary Modifications Nd 80- .e. Fort Calhoun Goal ui . 3 N60- _
.ec -
y
- A . ._ i 4_ ....,. . #- -4 ... 4..... %e.; +M h'
,< .6. 7 3.....e_ ....e..... % ;
n -
s j 0
May Jun Jul Aug I Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr :
1989 1990 l 25-February 1990 f 20 W March 1990 af I IApril 1990 b i 15- q
- e C i 1
- r. a 10- -
s 0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 > 12 Age in Months "EMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) 1 The top graph displays the total number of temporary :
l moditications, a monthly trend of installed electrical and mechanical temporary modifications, and a Fort Calhoun goal.
There was a total. of 47 jumpers installed in the plant at the end of April. Of the 47 installed jumpers, 22 electrical jumpers and 25 temporary mechanical jumpers existed in the Fort.Calhoun Station. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 25 total temporary modifications installed in the plant at the end of May, 1990.
The bottom graph, Ace of Temoorary Modifications, displays the age of all electrical and mechanical temporary modifications by months installed in the plant.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 71 i l
l 66-L
t i
25- l lOpen EAR's Closed EAR's 'I
- Number of EAR's > 30 Days Old -
20- 'i i? o Nf 15-g 1
$EL .
~
bA eR r ,' 10-L .
5-0-
Priority 1 Priority:2 Priority 3 Priority 4 April 1990 m
ll ENGINEET NG ASSISTANCE REOUEST P1 0RITY BREAKDOWN I l-This indicator Engineering. showsRequests Assistance the number (EAR'sof op)en broken downand closed into priorities at the end of the reporting month.
Along with the priority breakdown, the number of EAR's that are greater than 30 days old are shown for each priority category. .
Priority Doen Closed > 30 Davs Old ff&. H E A E f.tl fiE ADI f.tk. !!AE ADI Priority 1 4 12 15 4 5 5 1 9 12 Priority 2 14 16 19 2 1 4 10 '14 13 Priority 3 14 15 15 5 5 6 10 14 14 Priority 4 6 9 9 2 3 3 6 7 7 Total 38 52 58 13 14 18 27 44 46
- Adverse Trend: The number of EAR's in each priority has been increasing due to resources being ap) lied to outage related work. This outage related work, inclucing MR's and ECN's, has been given a higher priority by Engineering than EAR's.
1
i 1 ,
1 ;
7
'150 '
C Total ECN's Open-
- t. K- ECN's Opened During the Month
-+- ECN's Completed During the Month J 120- '
N-
-u O
- 90-o' -
f:
,l\ ,
s l \ ;
h 's
, /
s~'
~
\ lY N,
s
/ N
\' /
9
/ \S
\
'i
-s 30-
/ X ---~~N N l /%
1
.!^
/ 'N,*
. /
/,/
0- -
Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May - Jul
_Jun Aug 1989 1990 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS The indicator shows the total number of open .
. Engineering Change Notices .-(ECN's), the-number of ~ ECN's opened during' the- reporting month, and the number of ECN's completed 7 during the reporting month.
At the end of April, 1990,-there was a total ,
of87openECN's.Duringthemonth-ofApril, !
32 ECN s were opened, and 43 ECN's were completed.
Adverse Trend: None s
- t 200 I IDocument Change.
' Substitute Replacement Item 7 Facility Changes 159 150-129 100-
"= 54 50-38 18 20 0-Total ECN's ECN's Opened ECN's Completed Total ECN's Open During the Month During the Month Received.
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator breaks down the total number of Engineering Change Notices -(L N's) that remain open at the. end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's' that. were opened during the- reporting month,-' the number. of ECN's that were completed during the' reporting month, . and the number of ECN's received by Deuan. Engineering during the reporting . month into several catepcies. These categories include:
ECN's requiring a document chan<1e to complete, ECN's requiring substitute replacement items to comp'ete, and ECN's requiring facility changes to complete.
Total Doen Opened Comoleted Received Document Changes 29 18 20 129 Substitute Replacement 38 10 14 159 Facility Changes 21 5 9 54 Adyerse Trend: None
(
f_ ' 1 5- 1990 R:cordable. Injury Frequency Rate'
-H- 1989 Recordable Injury Frequency Rate
~4.5}
-+- 5 Year Avera9e Recordable Injury Frequency Rate
'4-J 3.5-GOOD a 3-R' - O a 2.5-s ,
j '\ ,A, A M
'\ '+..._ ,
1.5- '4,, ',,r +.....
. . . . + . . , . + . . . . . . + . . . . . + . . . .l 1-
.5-0- X l Jan. Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct .Nov 'Dec ;
April 1990 1
1 RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE00ENCY RATE This' indicator shows the monthly recordable injury cases frequency rate
-in column form. The above graph.also includes the 1989 recordable injury .
cases frequency rate and- the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year average recordable injury cases frequency rate.
A recordable injury : case is reported if Nuclear Operations. Division l
' personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical-treatment. The recordable cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis. There were zero recordable: injury cases reported i during -the month of April. There ' has been a total of one recordable injury case so far in'1990.
There were eleven recordable cases reported in 1989, eleven reported in 1988, and eight reported in 1987. The year ' end recordable injury frequency rates for 1987, 1988, and 1989 were 2.5, 2.6, and 2.2 respectively.
Adverse Trend: None .SEP 15 & 26 B
l l
l
1 1
Licensee Event Reports i IPersonnel-Errors Reported in-LERs j
- Cumulative Licensee Event Reports Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs f
50-46
(
a 39 40 r-
'31
?
30-s 20- ;
p -
12 10-p 0
'87' '88 '89' Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep- Oct Nov Dec 1990 t
g NIMEF OF PERSONNEL ERRORS
.R EPORTED IN LER'S
- The Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's Indicator j reports' the Licensee Event Reports (LER's) by their event date.
In April,1990 there were 5' LER's reported.. Out of the 5 LER's which occurred, there - were 2 LER's attributable to personnel error.
There have been 15 LER's reported so far in 1990 and 6 LER's have been attributable to personnel errors.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 1
.=___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __..________ __ -- - -
I l Nuclear Divisions Turnover Rate
- OPPD Corporate Turnover Rate j 5-
-T 4-u
- r. -
n-o' 3- '
v ,
e_ -
- r
, - . 2-l' R
L -a -
E 't
.e 1- <
0
' Nuclear Operations Production Engineering' Quality-Division Division and '
Environmental Affairs PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The' turnover rate -for three Nuclear Divisions is shown ~ for the last twelve months.
The personnel turnover rate is plotted against ~ the OPPD corporate turnover rate of 4.0%. This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last ,
three years. '
Adverse Trend: None i
b
-60d- -
Actual Staffing 561 1 l Authorized Staffing 4
L' P 400-e l r i s o' -
l n '
t n
l e 212 1 200 195 53 45 0- -
Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services Division Division Division L
STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 i
l l
)
1
300. ' -;
80-S :
R '
-0' '
P. - 60-a
's s ,
a R 40-a.
.t . ,
i
- o.
- p. 20-1 No Exams No Exams No Exams Administered Administered Administered 0 i NRC Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered OPPD Administered' 't Generic Site Specific Requalification Requalification Fundamental Exams. Exams Exams Exams 1
1 s
l' SRO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO-The- SRO License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator-shows the number of NRC administered Generic-
. Fundamentals Exams. -(GFE's), - the number of NRC 1 administered Site- Specific. Exams, the number of NRC '
administered license requalification exams and the number of OPPD. administered license requa,lification 4 exams.
No SR0 License examinations were -administered during April' 1990.
OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED l Requal Generic Fund. Site. Spec. Requal.
DATE % PASS RATIO -% PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO ~
Feb 1990 -
100 - -
l Adverse Trend: None i
~ ^ ^ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ " ^ ~ ^ ^ ^
g;5
~
t if '.01((-l .
l L100-l- -
80- '
!' ;R5 0 -
- P-60-
.a s
y s- -
l r
s
), ' . :Rn 40-f' >; .g. c d 11 . :
@ 'o-'
, o PF 20- -
Pip p
h, -
Nc, Exams No Exams No Exams ;,
i Administered Administered Administered P 0 l L.. NRC Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered OPPD Administered 4% -Generic. . Site Specific Requalification Requalification i
Ps Fundamental Exams Exams Exams .
[!lp t:;o. Exams-c L
p R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO-i The R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator shows f the number of NRC administered Generic - Fundamentals L Exams (GFE's), ' the -number of NRC administered Site iH . Specific ? Exams, the number of NRC administered.
4' license requalification exams,.and the number of OPPD
_ . administered license requalification exams.
No. R0 License examinations were-. administered during y ,,
the month of April,_1990.
h>
,nt OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED p, Requal Generic Fund. Site Spec. Requal, DATE % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO
.c % PASS RATIO
-t
'l Feb 1990 -
100 - -
p Is l- Adverse Trend: None
-i 9
L F
1 lSRO Exams Administered '
20;
@ SRO Exams Passed 1'
VA R0 Exams- Administered I l-E R0 Exams Passed -
e 1
N Ll u. 15-m-
b 7
(
L- - e; -
r- ,
o 10- 1
-f- ;
t
,E -
.)
x-a 1
m 5 s-i!
~5 ~5 i:
= = , ::
0 '
Feb Mar Apr~ May .Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov. Dec. Jan l
r --
1990 1991 L f 1
l L
LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS' -
- This indicator shows the number of SRO 'and 1 l- R0 quizzes' and exams taken and passed. each l
month. These internally administered quizzes
.and exams; are used to plot the SRO and -R0 candidates' monthly progress.
l =-
During the month of April, 1990, no SR0 exams were administered l During-' April, 3 R0 exams were administered and 3 R0 exams were passed.-
Adverse Trend: None !
l I
L l
7
?
s' ?
g !!!! Hotlines Initiated
'50-E Hotlines CP ,
M Hotlines Open snder 4 Weeks
- 45-Hotlines Open 0a Weeks I N
u = 40-a ,
b135-r 30-o E f 25- : '
1 :
N. '
, 20- l
-t" ! :
- 1 15- ! i i
,1- '
n : 10- .
! h ! ..
l' l
~
r 0
- ! E I ' 3 '-
l May -Jun Jul Aug- Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar- Apr 1989- 1990 HOTLINES 'I L
This indicator shows: the number of Hotlines initiated during the reporting. month, the number of Hotlines closed during the
.. reporting month, the number of Hotlines that l: remain open and are less than four weeks l old, and the -number of Hotlines that remain open and are older than four weeks oldr During the month of April,1990, there were 11 Hotlines initiated, 7 Hotlines closed, 7 Hotlines that remained open and were less t than four weeks old, and 8 Hotlines that i , remained open and were older than four weeks i: old.
,. Adverse Trend: None p
L L L 1
~4.>
E Planned Classroom Hours I IActual Classroom Hours T
h 3 ,
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989- 1990 l'
CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTORI HOUR _S assroom hours and t e nu er of actual ci s room hours for the Fort Calhoun Station.
!h due to the ti o col ect and process th!
needed information.
Adverse Trend: None i
)
l
i f'~~l Operations 25- E Maintenance j Chemistry and Radiation Protection E Technical Support '
M General Employee Training l
T 20- Other !
h 1
o u
s '
a g$.
10-H H
~~
- s-- ^
o ' ~~~
u .... l '
~;~~;
r 5-
-- ""~
=
F" !
s _.
r,,,,
E O
Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 1989 1990 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.
l This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.
Total Hours TRAINING FEB 1990 MAR 1990 Operations 2,435 2,223 Maintenance 3,278 1,007 Chemistry and 900 932 Radiation Protection Technical Support 1,323 322 <
General Employee Training 1,982 1,407 Other: 520 1.026 Total 10,438 6,917 Adverse Trend: None 4
i i
i 1
- Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours '
G- Fort Calhoun Goal i 11.1 15-l 10.6 l
l GOOD 12-4, 7.1 9,
o_...e....e....g.. 9...g...e....e. . e.. 9...g...o
! j Os )
, 6; .,, )
j I3-4
)
1 L
[
0 1
'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 1
VIOLATIO'NS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS -
This indicator displays the number of NRC -
violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC '
inspection hours. This indicator was calculated using the number of violations and the number of inspection hours from the months af December, 1989, through March, 1990.
This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.
The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 5.8 for the month of March, 1990.
There was one violation cited for the month of March. There have been a total of 4 violations cited with 879 inspection hours in 1990. '
The goal for the number of violations per 1000 inspection hours is less than 8.2. q Adverse Trend: None 4
aw- - -- - - - - -----n- w- a-~ ,,-,m,-,--- - - - - - -- - - -
wvwe
i
'75' 1 INumber of violatirns During the Last 12 Months M Number of NCV's During the Last 12 Months !
V !
1 o ?
1 l
a Nt 50- 47 i - ;
i
[u il. 4I
', s -
36 l r, i d
h o .
, ;.. fd 25-i N
{
19 C- !
V 4 16 l
i .
11 1 J
s I
0- -
l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep '
Oct Nov Dec 1990 h
i i
CUNULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCV's (7WELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) t i
The Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited 1 Violations- (NCV's) Indicator shows the ;
cumulative number of violations for the last '
twelve months and the cumulative number of ;
NCV's for the last twelve months. !
t During the last twelve months, 41 violations i have been identified and 19 NCV's have been identified, I i
1 Adverse Trendt None l
l 1 1
I I
l l
I 1
- Total Outstanding CAR's Outstanding CAR's > Six Months Old Outstanding CAR's That Are Modification Related 200-150-i gf 6
%/
-u. )
N100-eR ]
r' .
50 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr !
1989 1990 i
I OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS l.
This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's), the number of outstanding CAR's that are greater than six months old, and the ,
number of outstanding CAR's that are modification related.
As of the end of April,1990 there were 145 outstanding CAR's reports, 42 CAR's that are '
greater than six months old, and 10 CAR's '
that are modification related.
Adverse Trendt None 4
O' " Overdue CAR's i
i
- I"'"ICAR's With Extensions Granted !
i 30-0 b , {
e ;
r l
, 20 i f
i C :
A R 10- _
's j
0 G M '"
N P O N P 0 N P 0 N P 0 N P 0 N P 0 0 E t 0 E t 0 E 0 l t E t 0 E t 0 E t !
D D h D D h D D h D D h D D h D D h .
e e e e e e
- r r r r r r s s s s s s Nov 1989 ;
Dec 1989 Jan 1990 Feb 1990 Mar 1990 Apr 1990 1
l OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS l i
This indicator shows the number of overdue CAR's and the number of ;
CAR's which received extensions broken down by organization for the 1
-last six months.
L
%1AN12AT10N OVERDUE CAR's FEB 90 MAR 90 APR 90 j
l
- 10) 1 0 5 PED 2 3 l 6 others 1 0 0 Total 4 3 11 CAR's WITH EXTENSIONS GRANTED ORIANIZATION FEB 90 MAR 90 APR 90 NO) 4 5 1
)
i PED 3 6 7 Others 0 0 0
)
Total 7' 11 8 i
Adverse Trend: PED overdue and extended CAR's have been increasing due to reduced PED management attention on processing CAR's and to the increasing number of CAR's being assigned to PED.
1
._ _ - ~ __ _ . _ _ _- ,_ _ _ _ __.__._._ _.._ - . . . . _ . .
120- E CAR's >6 Months Old I ICAR's 0-6 Months Old l -
N y 90-b e -
o 60-f
~
C A
T-l
$ 30-l _
JB -
E l
N O
P E
0 t
N 0
P E t 0 N P 5N 0 P N P $~N 0
P ~I E t E t 0 E t E t D D h D D h D D h D D h D D h D D h i e e e e e e r r r r r r s s s s s s Nov 1989 Dec 1989 Jan 1989 Feb 1989 Mar 1989 Apr 1990 l
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS CURRENT STATUS This indicator shows the number of CAR's that are older than 6 months and the number of CAR's that are less than 6 months old broken down by organization for the last six months.
CAR's GREATER THAN 6 MONTHS OLD ORGANIZATION FEB 90 MAR 90 APR 90 N00 11 7 6 PED 35 30 34 Others 3 2 2 i Total 49 39 32 CAR's LESS THAN 6 MONTHS OLD ORGANIZATION FEB 90 }%R_.2Q APR 90 l NOD 35 43 43 PED 44 51 51 Others 5 12 9 Total 84 106 103 l
Adverse Trend: The total number of PED open CAR's has been increasing due to reduced PED management attention on processing CAR's and to the increasing number of CAR's being assigned to PED.
1989~ 1990
.OPPD SIGNIFICANT NRC OPPD SIGNIFICANT INIC SALP FUNCTIONAL AREA CAR's~ CAR's VIOLATIONS LER S CAR's CAR's VIE.ATISIS LDt OS A. Plant Operations 11 0 8 2 17 (7) 0 0 7 (1)
- 8. Radiological Controls 30 1 2 1 21 2 0 0 I C. Maintenance / 140 8 2 10 4 (1)
Surveillance 104 (29) 3 2 (2) i D. Emergency 8 0 0 0 2 (2) 0 0 0 I Preparedness :
E. Security 26 2 6 10 8 (4) 0 0 1 (1)
F. Engineering / 134 2 1 (1)
Technical 7 7 41 (15) 0 5 (1) '
Supp;;rt G. Safety Assessment / 68 0 1 0 9 (3) 0 0 0 Quality Verification i H. Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f 1 Total 417 13 26 31 5 (1) 4 (1)
R02 (60) 15 (5)
CAR'S ISSUED VERSUS SIGNIFICANT CAR'S VERSUS IstC VIOLATi,0RS ISSHED VERSUS LER'S REPORTED
' q The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) issued by the Nuclear ;
Services Division versus the number of Significant CAR's issued by the Nuclear Services Division "
versus the number of violations issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the Fort
' Calhoun Station in 1989 and -1990. Included in this table is the 'wcher of Licensee Event Reports ;
(LER's) identified by the station each year. The number cf NRC violations reported are one month '
behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting ens processing the violations. t In April,1990, there were 60 CAR's issued, one Significant CAR issued, and 5 LER's identified. '
i During March one NRC violation was issued. This violation was not attributable to personnel error.
The monthly distribution of CAR's, Significant CAR's, NiiC violations, and LER's are shown in parentheses. -
SEP 15, 20 & 21 l
. _ - . .__ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _____ _ _ __ _ _ _ .- - - - - . = . . - - . - - - - - - .
~
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT HISTORY Escalated enforcement includes level III, II, and I violations issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Comission for deficiencies discovered at the Fort Calhoun Station. Escalated enforcement also includes civil penalties which are usually assessed with level III and higher violations. Listed below is the escalated enforcement history for the Fort Calhoun Station.
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT
- 1. february 1985 Site Security - Multiple Level IV and V Violations that were escalated to a Level III. A civil penalty of $21,425 was ast.essed,
- 2. March 1985 Inaccurate information in res 82 Level III Violation. ponse to NRC No civil Bulletin penalty was assessed.
- 3. April 1986 Qualification of Electrical Penetrations - Level III Violation. No civil penalty was assessed.
- 4. May 1986 Radiological Protection - Two Level III Violations.
No civil penalty was assessed.
- 5. December 1986 Physical Security - Level IV Violation. A civil penalty of $15,000 was assessed.
- 6. January 1987 Lack of Adequate Safety Evaluation for Emergency Modification - Level III Violation. A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed.
- 7. January 1988 Unlocked High Radiation Doors and Lack of Health Physics Coverage to Very High Radiation Areas - Level III violation. A civil penalty of $75,000 was assessed.
- 8. February 1988 Desiv Evaluation, Design Implementation and Class fication/ Reporting, and Corrective Action of Water Intrusion into the Instrument Air System - 3 Level III Violations. A civil penalty of $175,000 was assessed.
- 9. May 1988 Unlocked Very High Radiation Door and deficiencies identified in the Radiolo ical Protection Program - 2 Level III Violations. A c vil penalty of $112,500 was assessed.
- _- -_ - - - -- - --- - - - - - - - - ~~ ~
ESCALATEDENFORCEMENTHISTORY(CONTINUED)
ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT
- 10. October 1988 A missing cap on a 3/8 inch containment line, SIRWT check valve test failures, and Safety Analysis for Operability - Level III violation. A civil penalty of
$50,000 was assessed.
- 11. October 1988 Errors in Cycle 11 Setpoint Analysis and incorrect information submitted in a response - Level III Violation. No civil penalty was assessed.
- 12. November 1989 Two instances of safeguards documents left unattended outside the plant's protected area. Instances of inadequate package and vehicle searches. Inadequate measures to compensate for degraded security systems
- Level III violation. A civil penalty of $25,000 was assessed.
- 13. November 1989 Inadequate testing of a turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pump -
Level III violation. No civil penalty was assessed.
_ - _ - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - ' - ~
ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS Enforcement conferences are held with the NRC on potential higher level violations. Listed below are the recent enforcement conferences and management meetings held with the NRC.
RECENT ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS
- 1. January 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in January.
This meeting was held concerning the new Site Security Plan.
- 2. February 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in February. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning the Radiological Protection Progreen.
- 3. February 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in Februtity. This management meet 1ng was held concerning the Safety Enbncement Prograin.
- 4. April 1989 One Enforcewnt Conference was held with the NRC in April. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning Security.
- 5. May 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in May.
This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.
- 6. July 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in July. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning auxiliary feedwater pump FW-10 controller operability.
- 7. August 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in August. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning various security problems.
- 8. September 1989 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in September. One management meeting was held concerning the Saf ety Enhancement Program (SEP). The other management meeting concerned the Committee Review of GenericRequirements(CRGR).
88-
ENFORCEMENTCONFERENCESANDMANAGEMENTMEETINGS(CONTINUED)
- 9. January 1990 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in January. This Conference was held concerning two topics. One topic concerned the simultaneous isolation of two Component Cooling Water (CCW) heat exchangers. OPPD has been notified by the NRC that this topic has been classified as a Level IV violation. The other topic concerned ST-CEA-1. This Surveillance Test could have taken both diesel generators out of service at the same time. OPPD has wen notified that this to a Non-Cited Violation (NCV)pic has been classified as LIO. January 1990 One management meeting was held with the NRC in January. This management meeting was held concerning theSafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP).
- 11. February 1990 One management meeting was held with the NRC in February. This meeting was held to brief the NRC concernirg the status of the Fort Calhoun Station.
- 12. March 1990 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in March. One of these meetings was held concerning containment spray raw water, end cor.tainment purge.
The other managem,ent meeting was beld with the NRC to present a general overview of the status of the Fort Calhoun Station.
- 13. April 1990 Five managenent meetings were held with the NRC in April. Two of these meetings concerned Fort Calhoun Station startup issues, one meeting concerned engineering status, one meeting concerned seismic issues, and one meeting concerned plant performance.
SIGNIFICANT ITEMS OF INTEREST This section is intended to provide information on events which are significant to the Fort Calhoun Station and will give a
- heads-up" look at what is scheduled in the coming months.
The 1990 INPG Plant Evaluation is scheduled to start on June 18, 1990.
The 1990 INPO Corporate Evaluation is scheduled for July 9 through July 13, 1990.
The INPO OPPD Simulator Evaluations are scheduled for July, 1990.
The NRC Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) Review is scheduled for August 20 through August 21, 1990.
The NRC Maintenarace Inspection Team follow-up review has been rescheduled until November, 1990.
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding corrective non-outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus their age in months.
AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, non outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total .
number of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders.
AUXILI ARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system is outside the station chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated from the first sample exceedin to 3e back with<g the limit until additional sampling shows the parameter
~
n limits.
CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS The number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom _
hours for the Fort Calhoun Station.
CORRECT!'/E ACTION REPORT CURRENT STATUS The number of Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) that are older than 6 months and the number of CAR's that are less than 6 months old broken down by organization for the last 6 months.
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstanding corrective maintenance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of the period reported.
CUMJLATIVE VIO.ATI0tS AND NON-CITED VIOLATIONS ITWELVE-MON"H RUNNI1G TOTAL)
The cumulative number of violations and Non-Cited Violations for the last 12 months.
DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The daily core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in thermal megawatts.
DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY A Diesel Generator (DG) unit consists of the engine, generator, combustion air system, cooling water system, fuel supply s lubricating oil system, starting air s controls, and diesel generator breaker. ystem, autostart controls, ystem manual
FORTCAl.HOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (CONTINUED)
Reliability of each DG unit will be reported for two situations, one for the last 20 demands and one for the last 100 demands. Reliability is the ratio of the number of successful runs to the number of demands, for each individual DG unit.
A successful run is defined as a start of a DG unit and the loading of this unit period ofto 60aminutes.
minimum of 50% rated load (1250 KW) for a minimum time A failure is defined as the failure to start, accelerate, and assume the E design rated load for the given time period as specified for an emergency or a valid test.
The total number of demands (or valid tests) will be equal to the sum of the failures and the successful runs. ,
This definition of DG Reliability was taken from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connission ' Regulatory Guide 1.108, Revision 1". This is the definition being applied in calculating the diesel generator reli6bility at the Fort Calhoun Station.
DISABLING INJURY tRE00ENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE 1 This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include contractor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel performance for '
SafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP) Item 26.
DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL)
The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed during the reporting month, the number of documents scheduled for review during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are overdue.
ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE00EST (EAR's) PRIORITY BREAKDOWN The number of open and closed EAR's broken down into priorities at the end of the reporting month.
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN1 BREAKDOWN The breakdown of the total number of open ECN's, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were completed during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's received during the reporting month into three categories. These categories incluce; 1) document changes are required to complete the ECN's, 2) substitute or replacenent items are required to complete the ECN's, or 3) facility changes are required to complete the ECN's.
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS The number of ECN's that remain open at the end of the reporting month, the number of ECN's that were opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's that are completed during the reporting month.
EOUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours is the inverse of the mean time between forced outages caused by equipment failures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is critical in a period (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment failures in that period.
EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross available generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available peneration is the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at tie maximum power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuous'y at maximum capacity.
EXPEDITED PURCHASES The percentage of expedited purchases which occurred during the reporting month compared to the total number of purchase orders generated.
FORCED OUTAGE RATE This indicator is defined as the percentage of time that the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared to the time planned for electrical generation. Forced events are failures or other unplanned conditions that require removing the unit from service before the end of the next . weekend. Forced events include startup failures and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., the unit is
, available but not in service.
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant I-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a common purification rate.
Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is elements from the manufacturing process.present on the surface of fuel Steady state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power for at least seven days.
j
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
GASEQUS RADIDACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED O T' THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station.
GROSS HEAT RATE Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal energy in British Thermal Units (BTV) produced by the reactor to the total electricalenergyproducedbythegeneratorinkilowatt-hours (KWH). gross HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED The amount (in Kilograms) of waste oil, non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by the Fort Calhoun Station each month.
HOTLINES The number of Hotlines that are initiated, closed, overdue, and open for a given month. A Hotline is a training document sent out for immediate review. The Hotline should be reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the Hotline.
HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding guidelines durin Power operation is defined as greater than 30% power. g power The operation. tracked 13 parameters are steam generator pH, cation conductivity, boron silica chloride, sulfate, sodium, feed water pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine,, iron, copper, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen.
IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE Total number of in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service in the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).
INVOICE BREAKDOWN The number of invoices that are on hold due to shelf life, CQE, and miscellaneous reasons.
LIQUID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the volume of liquid radioactive waste released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks. The curies from all releases from the Fort Calhoun Station to the Missouri River are also shown.
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)
LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)
The total number of security incidents for the reporting month. This
[ indicator tracks security performance for Safety Enhancement Program Item Number 58.
MAINIINANCE EFFECTIVENESS The number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) components with more than one f ailure and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures during the last twelve months.
MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG The number of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that remain
-_ open at the end of the reporting month. This indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report to trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders as stated in Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) g item No. 36.
MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN m
This indicator is a breakdown of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders by several categories that remain open at the end of the reporting month.
MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The percentage of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel.
MATERIAL REOUESTS AWAITING APPROVAL The number of material requests awaiting approval at the end of the reporting month and the number of material requests in which the Material l Management Division (MD) has been contacted to order the material for j the material requests.
MAXIMUM INDIVIDVAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The total maximum amount of Gama and Neutron (Whole Body) radiation received by an individual person working at the Fort Calhoun Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis.
NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS component failures (confirmed and possible) rnd the number of confirmed NPRDS component
= failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures are based on the number of failure reports that have been sent to the Institute of Nuclear Operations (INPO). Confirmed NPRDS component failures are based upon failure reports that have been accepted by INPO. Possible NPRDS component failures are based upon failure reports that are still under review by INPO.
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
NU4BER OF NUCLEAR LANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SU BMIT1ED (CONTINUE D NPRDS is the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group program which has been outlined by INPO and implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station.
NUMBER OF OUT-OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform its design function is considered as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written for it and has not been repaired by the end of the reporting period is considered out-of-service and will be counted. The duration of the out-of-service condition is not considered.
Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments.
NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed to personnel error on tiie original LER submittal. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15.
MMBER OF MISSE) SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN klfgliE E EVEN1 (EPORTS The number of Surveillance Tests (ST's) that result in Licensee - Event Reports (LER's) during for Safety Enhancement theSEP)
Program repItem (orting. This Numbers 60 indicator and 61. tracks missed ST's NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspection reports for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC insaection hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspect'on was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspection hours.
OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The year to date budget compared to the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance.
OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The number of Modification Requests (16t'S) in any state between the issuance of a Modification Number and the completion of the drawing update.
i FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
DUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS (CONTINUED)
Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress The Form FC-1133 has not been plant approved.
Modification kequests Being Reviewed This category includes:
1.) Modification Requests that are not yet reviewed 2.)
ModificationRequestsbeingreviewedby)the NuclearProjectsReviewCommittee(NPRC 3.) reviewed by the
- Modification Requests Nuclear Projects Committeebeing(NPC)
These Modification Requests may be reviewed -several times before they are ap) roved for accomplishment or cancelled. Some of these Modification Requests are returned to Engineerino for more . information, some approved for evaluation, some approved for study, and some -approved for planning. Once planning is completed and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Modification Requests may be approved for accomplishment with a year assigned for construction or they may be cancelled. All of these different phases require review.
Design Engineering Backlog Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed, but PED has not started design work.
Design Engineering In Progress Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed and design work is in progress.
Construction Backlog /In Progress The Construction Package has been issued or construction has begun but the modification has not been accepted by the System Acceptance Committee (SAC).
Design Engineering Update Backlog /In Progress PED has received the Modification Completion Report but the drawings have not been updated.
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
DVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS The number of overdue Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) and the number of CAR's which received extensions broken down by organization for the last 6 months.
PERCENT OF CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS GREATER THAN SIX MONTHS OLD This indicator displays the percentage of Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) that are greater than six months old.
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole-body dose received by all on-site personnel (including contractors and visitors during a time period, as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD)).
Collective radiation exposure is reported in units of man-rem. This indicator tracks radioltyical work performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number b.
PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employment. A turnover is a vacancy cri.ated b death, termination, ytransfers voluntarywithin resignation from theand the company, company.
part-timeRetirement, employees are not considered in turnover.
PREVENTIVE M41 E QAjig,F J D % pyERDUE This indicator is defined e.s the percentage of preventive maintenance items in the month that were not completed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25 percent of the scheduled interval. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance activities for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNumber41.
PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The percent of hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry parameters divided by the total number of hours possible for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluccide, and Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
The number of identified incidents concerning maintenance procedural the number of closed IR's related to the use of procedures p(roblems, includes the number of closed IR's caused by procedural no and the number of closed procedural noncompliance IR's. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item Numbers 15 and 41.
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The number of identified poor radiological work practices (PRWP) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SafetyEnhancement(SEP)ItemNumber52.
RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance testing and calibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenance and preventive maintenance completed over the reporting The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on manperiod.
hours. This indicator tracks preventive ma'ntenance activities for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNumber41.
RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE)
The number of injuries requiring more than normal first aid per 200,000 manhours worked. This indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No. 15 and SEP ltem 26.
R0 HOT Li(ENSE EXAMS This indicater shows the number of SRO and/or R0 quizzes and exams that !
are administered and passed each nonth. "
R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO I
The R0 license exwination pass ratio for NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC administered license requalification exams, and OPPD administered license requalification exams.
. , ,, SLCONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation based on the concentration of key impurities in the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the period of i time greater than 30 percent power. '
The following ernation is how the CPI is calculated:
CPI =((Ka/0.8)+(Na/20)+(0/10))/32 Where the following sarameters are monthly averages of; Ka = average )1owdown cation conductivity Na = average blowdown sodium concentration 02 = average condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen concentration
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
SECURITY INCIDENTS This indicator shows a percentile breakdown of the types of Security incidents for the reporting month.
The following items are the types of Security incidents represented in this indicator.
LicenseeDesignatedVehicles(LDV's)
Incidents related to the use of LOV's, e.g. ke vehicle, loss of keys, or failure to return ' keys.ys left in the Security Badges Incidents involving lost / unattended badges, badges removed from site, or failure to wear badges.
Escorting Incidents involving escort responsibilities, e.g. improper control or escort of a visitor (s).
Security System Failures Incidents involving alarm system faiiures - CCTV failures, security com) uter failures, terminal failures, door equipment failures anc card reader failures.
Security Key Control incidents involving Security key control, e.g. lost Security keys, Securit Security keys.y keys This t rencvec from site, or failure to return concerning LDV keys. ype of incident does liot reflect incidents Access Control Incidents involving the inspection and control of personnel, packages, and vehicles, e.g. failure to properly search personnel, packa}es, and vehicles. This item also includes the introduction or contraband or prohibited items into the Protected Area, or the attempted introduction of such items.
This' indicator tracks security performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNumber58.
-100-1
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES The number of Security incidents concerning alarm systems failures, CCTV failures failures,, security computer failures, terminal failures, door equipment and card reader failures. This indicator tracks security performanceforSafetyEnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNumber58.
SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The dollar value of the spare parts inventory at the end of the reporting period.
SPARE PARTS ISSUED The dollar value of the s)are parts issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting periot.
SRO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO l The SRO license examination pass ratio for NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams administered license (GFE's),
re NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC requalification exams. qualification exams, and OPPD administered license STOCK 00T RATE The total number of Pick lickets that were generated during the re>orting month, the total number of Pick Tickets t1at were generated dur' ng the .
reporting month with no parts available, and the total number of Pick Tickets that were gencrated during the reporting month in which the MMIS computer s .
available. ystem showed a sufficient supply of parts but no parts were l TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS i The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's systems.
Temporary configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in ,
the plant operating systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the P&lD, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams. I Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or 0)erating Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications unless tie jumper or block remains in place after the test or procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifications.
t
-101-4
F f
FORT CALHOUN PERF.)RMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED)
TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (CONTINUED)
Scaffolding is not considered a tem)orary modification. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for whic1 EEAR's have been submitted, will be considered as a temporary modifications until final resolution of the EEAR and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings.
This indicator tracks temporary modifications for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNumber71.
TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING The total number of student hours of trainin for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection. g Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.
TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm s performance for SEP Item No.15. quarad. This indicator trends personnel MNPt ANNELAUTOMTIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHR.E CRITICAL This indicator is defined as the number cf unplanned automatic scrams (reactor protection systen logic actuations) that occur while the reactor is criticas. The indicator it fcther defined as follows:
Unplanned means th6t the scram was not ptet of a planned test or evolution.
s Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious.
Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensors monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control room.
Critical means that during the steady-state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication factor (keff)wasequaltoone.
I
-102-I 1
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS This indicator is defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations:
the number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal the number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuations that result from a loss of power to a safeguards bus An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint for a safety (system is generated is reached ECCS only), or equipment and major when a spurious or inadvertent in the system signal is actuated.
Unplanned means that the system actuation was not part of a planned test or evolution.
The ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure injection system, or the safety injection tanks.
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive during a given period. It t
waste pecduced, is calculated using theinamount final form ready of waste for burial,lly shippad for disposal actua ,
plus tha change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for borial. The volume v' radioactive waste that is not yet in final form ready for shipment is not included. Low-level solid radicactive waste consists of dry acthe waste, sludges resins, and ,
, esaporatorbottomsgeneratedasaresultofnuclearpowerpiantoperation l, and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning j materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other meterial to be disposed of at a low-level adioactive waste l disposal site except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all , radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent-fuel processing.
This indicator tracks radiological work performance for Safety EnhancementProgram(SEP)ItemNumber54.
WAREHOUSE ISSUES The totrl number of warehouse issues, the number of non-CQE stock issues, the numba of CQE stock issues, the number of direct charge non-CQE issues, an't the number of direct charge CQE issues which occurred during the reporting month.
-103-i a
FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)
WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS The total number of warehouse receipts, the number of non-CQE stock receipts, the number of CQE stock receipts, the number of direct charge non-CQE receipts, and the number of direct charge CQE receipts which occurred during the reporting month.
WAREHOUSE RETURNS The percentage of the total number of warehouse returns, the number of spare parts returns, the number of standard stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns compared to the total number of warehouse issues.
-104-
BAS 15 FOR ESTABLISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOA Q
' This section will explain the basis used in establishing the 1990 performance goals.
FORCED OUTAGE RATE AND EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) goals have been established from 1990 to 1992. The following table is a breakdown of the hours allotted for each category over the next three years.
STARTUP GENERATOR FORCED OUTAGE PLANNED ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR
,YJfiq fHOURS) (HOURS) (HOURSI (HOURS) { HOURS) ,(,1). ,(11 1990(*) 6356 168 172 2064 8760 65.4 2.4 1991(*) 6956 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1992 8520 240 0 0 8760 92.9 2.7 j
(*) Refueling Outage Years UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL The 1990 goal for Unplanned Autometic Rt. actor Scrams While Critical has been set at one. The Fort Calhoun' Station has had one unplanned automatic refactor scram in the past four years of operation.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYS M ACTUATIONS I
The Unplannec Safety System Actuation! goal for 1990 has been established !.
at zero. The Fort Calhocn Station has not had tn ut. planned stfety system actuation in the last six years.
I GROSS HEAT R E The 1990 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set
.at 10,200 BTU /KWH. This heat rate goal is based on 10.435 BTU /KWH for the month of January, 10,450 BTU /KWH for the month of February, 10.325 ;
BTU /KWH for the month of May, 10,225 BTU /KWH for the month of June, 10,325 BTU /KWH for the month of July,10,250 BTU /KWH for the month of ;
August, 10,125 BTU /KWH for the month of September, 10,050 BTV/KWH for the '
month of October, 10,000 BTU /KWH for the month of November, and 9,975 BTU /KWH for the month of December.
i
-105-
BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GDALS (CONTINUE 0)
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The 1990 Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for ap)roximately one to two fuel pin failures. Although Cycle 11 was completec without any apparent fuel pin f ailures, there are a number of ANF assemblies entering into a third or fourth cycle of operation. When a fuel pin has been used for three or four fuel cycles there is an increased probability of fuel failure. The Failed Fuel Action Plan, Standing Order 0-43, allows for approximately four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels.
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
The 1990 Personnel Radiation Ex This goal was based on 234 manposure (Cumulative) rem of cumulative goal is 287 exposure man-rem.
for the 1990 Refueling Outage and approximately 5.9 man-rem of cumulative exposure for each non-outage month.
VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIDACTIVE WASTE The 1990 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 5,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a reconnendation made by the Fort Calhoun l
' ALARA Committee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Production Division.
DISABL7PGIWJURLFREOUEr{CY?, ATE The Disabling Injury Frequency Rate 1990 goal has been set et 0.31. This goal allows for one lost time accident in the Nuclear Production Livision during 1990.
-106-
1
?
FORT cal.HOUN STATION QPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE
,; EVENT FROM -
(MWH) (MWH)
TQ Cycle 1 09/26/73 - 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 First Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 - 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 Second Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 - 09/30/77. 2,805,927 9,958,888 Third Refueling 09/30/77 - 12/09/77 l Cycle 4 12/09/77 - 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 Fourth Refueling 10/14/78 - 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Fifth Refueling 01/18/80 - 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81
- Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83
' Cycle-8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Eighth Refueling 03/03/84 - 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 i Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86-
- Cycle 10 ,
01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 ,
Tenth Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 ;
Cycle 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 - 02/17/90 Twelfth Refueling 02/17/90 - 05/14/90*
- - Planned Dates
-107-
S FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFJELING OUTAGE DATES (CONTINUID) . !
PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE ;
' EVENT FROM - TO (MWH) (MWH)
Cycle 13 05/14/90*- 09/28/91*
Thirteenth Refuelin'g 09/28/91*- 11/22/91*
Cycle 14 11/22/91*- 02/12/93* ,
Fourteenth Refuelin9 02/12/93*- 05/06/93*
Cycle 15 05/06/93*- 09/30/94*
Fifteenth Refueling- 09/30/94*- 11/26/94* i
(
)
s
'I d
- - Planned Dates
-108-P
FORT CALHOUN STATION .
PRODUCTION-AND OPERATION RECORDS The= following seven items are the current production and operation
" records" for the Fort Calhoun Station.
- 1. First Sustained Reaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 5,1973(5:47p.m.) i
- 2. First Electricity Supplied to the System . . . . . August 25, 1973
- 3.CommercialOperation(180,000 KWH)........ September 26, 1973 4.AchievedFullPower~(100%)............May4,1974 5.LongestRun(477 days)............... June 8,1987-Sept.27,1988 .l 6.HighestMonthlyHetGeneration(364,468,800KWH).0ctober1987 7.MostProductivefuelCycle(4,936,859 MWH).... June 8,1987-Sept.27,1988 (Cycle 11).
i s
]
o i
1
- s. .I i
-109-
. _ _ - _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ -l
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCES i
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MANAGER / INDIVIDUAL ;
Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work,0rders .Peterson/Schmitz Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts Peterson/McCormick !
Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits Franco /Stultz CAR's Current Status Orr/Gurtis CAR's Issued Versus NRC Violations Issued Orr/Blome Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Newhouse Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old Peterson/Schmitz Cumulative Violations and NCV's Chase /Simmons Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray
]
. Decontaminated Auxiliary Building -Peterson/Gundal-L Diesel Generator Reliability DG Log 1
Disabling Injury Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs
,; . Document Review Peterson/McKay l
Engineering. Assistance Requests Priority Bre: c ; Jaworski/Middaugh-Engineering Change Notice Breakdown Phelps/Bera e Engineering Change Notice. Status Phelps/Bera \
Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray l Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek '
Expedited Purchases Willrett/Fraser Forced Outage Rate Holthaus/ Gray Fuel Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lofshult Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Franco /Stultz Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray Hazardous Waste Produced Peterson/Sayre
-110-
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED) '
Hotlines Gasper /Newhouse ,
In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Peterson/Renaud Invoice Breakdown- Willrett/Fussell Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Franco /Stultz Loggable/ Reportable Security Incidents Sefick/Woerner Maintenance Effectiveness Jaworski/ Dowdy .
Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) Peterson/Schmitz Maintenance Work Order Breakdown Peterson/Schmitz Maintenance Overtime Peterson/Schmitz l Material Requests Awaiting Approval Willrett/Fraser
-Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Peterson/Mattice Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Jaworski/ Dowdy h Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Peterson/Cary ,
L L
Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's Chase /Simmons Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's Plant LER's Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Orr/Blome Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner Overdue and Extended CAR's Orr/Gurtis Percent of CAR's Greater Than Six Months Old Orr/Blome PersonnelRadiationExposure(Cumulative) Peterson/Mattice
-Personnel Turnover Rate Jaworski/Yager Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue Peterson/ Linden
-111-
7 1 m
' PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED)- ?
- Primary System Chemistry . Percent Hours Out of Limits Franco /Stultz ProceduralNoncomplianceIncidents(Maintenance) Peterson/McKay
- Radiological ~ Work Practices. Program Peterson/Mattice Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Peterson/Schmitz ,
Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs R0 Hot License Exams '
Gasper /Howard Ji R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper /Howard a
Secondary System Chemistry Franco /Stultz y Security Incident Breakdown Sefick/Woerner Security System Failures Sefick/Woerner ,
Spare Parts Inventory Turnover Ratio Steele/ Miser Spare Parts Inventory Value Steele/Huliska
[- .SRO Licer.se' Examination Pass Ratio Gasper /Howard Staffing Level Jaworski/Yager Stockout Rate Willrett/Fussell' Temporary Modifications Jaworski/ Turner Total, Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Peterson/Armagno i-Unplanned-Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical Holthaus/ Gray.
Unplanned Safety System Actuations Holthaus/ Gray Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste Peterson/Breuer Warehouse Issues Willrett/Fussell.
Warehouse Receipts Willrett/Fussell Warehouse Returns Willrett/Fussell
-I
-112- !
REFERENCES- 1 l
- INPO ' Good - Practices 0A-102, " Performance Monitoring - Management ,
-e-Information" l IEEE Standard 762, -"IEEE Trial Use Standard Definitions for' Use in :
- Reporting Generating Unit Reliability, Availability and Productivity"
] ,
INPO Report Dated November 1984, " Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" -
l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108 I
1 s
i'
+1 l
l l.
I' i
f
-113-
,