ML20040F254
| ML20040F254 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 02/04/1982 |
| From: | Crutchfield D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Fiedler P JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| References | |
| TASK-02-01.A, TASK-02-01.B, TASK-02-01.C, TASK-2-1.A, TASK-2-1.B, TASK-2-1.C, TASK-RR LSO5-82-02-035, LSO5-82-2-35, NUDOCS 8202090012 | |
| Download: ML20040F254 (15) | |
Text
F y..
February 4,1982 N,
os 93
'/
Docket No. 50-219
De,
(
LS05-82-02-035 O!g
~
a d
Mr. P. B. Fiedler W
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station IMA Post Office Box 388 Forked River, New Jersey 08731
Dear Mr. Fiedler:
SUBJECT:
SEP TOPICS II-1.A. EXCLUSION AREA AUTHORITY AND CONTROL; II-1.P. POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; II-1.C. POTENTIAL HAZARDS al DUE TO NEARBY TRANSPORTATION, INSTITUTIONAL INDUSTRIAL AND MILITARY FACILITIES - OYSTER CREEK Enclosed are the staff's final evaluations of SEP Topics Il-1.A. II-1.B.
and II-1.C for the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station. These eval-uations are based on the review previded in your letter dated May 7, 1931 as supplemented by letter dated November 30, 1981.
Our review has determined that your facility meets the criteria current-ly used for licensing new facilities.
This completes our evaluations of these topics.
Th6se evaluations will be a basic input to the integrated safety assess-ment for your facility unless you identify changes needed to reflect the as-built conditions at you-facility. These assessments may be revised in the future if your facility design is changed or if HRC criteria re-lating to this dubject are inodified before the integrated assessment is completed.
.5 60N e
Sincerely.
[
t>suUE(54)
ADD',
G>. Sh6[
Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief 8202090012 820204 Operatisig Reactors Branch No. 5 g'g PDR ADOCK "5000219 Division of Licensing P
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ enclosure:
e.Cd /
co.
,s.
- c m,,.
o
,,,(,S,[P,8 C,,,,,,,h.,',,',,,,,,,,,,
,,,0 RB # 5
, 0,R g,,,,,,,(h,a,s,:DL,,
DbA,
..SEP8 a,,,,,,,,,
. sea.;9..n.a,;,b!
,,3@,1,{na., yRu,s s,e,ll,,,,,,,,J L,gm b,a,r,,
, DC,ru,,j,,,1 el d, orries >
, G,L 1
sua-s >
, f,4f 82
. 2,t2,t s.2,,,,,,,,,,,,2/,,148,2,,,,,,,,,,,,2 4,y/,8,2.,,,,,,,,2iaz8,,,,,
2/e/,82 2
om>
unc ronu sis oo-noi nacu ano OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usara m _ m m g
/
Mr. P. B. Fiedler CC G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire Resident Inspector Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge c/o U. S. NRC 1800 M Street, N. W.
Post Office Box 445 Washington, D. C.
20036 Forked River, New Jersey 08731 J. B. Lieberman, Esquire Commissioner Berlack Israels & Lieberman New Jersey Department of Energy 26 Broadway 101 Connerce Street New York, New York 10004 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Natural Resources Defense Council 91715th Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C.
20006
,J. Knubel BWR Licensing Manager GPU Nuclear 100 Interplace Parkway Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Deputy Attorney General State of New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety 36 West State Street - CN 112 Trenton, New Jersey 08625 Ms. Phyllis Haefner 101 Washington Street Tons River, New Jersey 08753 Mayor Lacey Township 818 Lacey Road Forked River, New Jersey 08731 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II Office ATTN: Regional Radiation Representative 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10007 I
Licensing Supervisor Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Post Office Box 388 Forked River, New Jersey 08731 l
l l
SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM TOPIC II-1.A OYSTER CREEK TOPIC:
II-1.A, Exclusion Area Authority and Control I.
INTRODUCTION 4
The safety objective of this topic is to assure that appropriate exclusion area authority and control are maintained by the licensee as required by 10 CFR Part 100.
II.
REVIEW CRITERIA Section 100.3(a) of 10 CFR Part 100 requires that a reactor licensee have the authority to determine all activities within the designated area, in-cluding the exclusion and removal of personnel and property.
III.
RELATED SAFETY TOPICS Topic XIII-1, " Conduct of Operations" will assure that the licensee can adequately specify proper operation in routine, accident and emergency conditions.
The topic is being covered as part of the NRC TMI Task Action Plan.
Topic XIII-2, " Safeguards / Industrial Security" will evaluate the licensee's capability to protect the operating unit (s).
IV.
REVIEW GUIDELINES The review was. conducted in accordance with the guidance given in SRP 2.1.2.
The capability of the plant to meet the dose criteria of 10 CFR Part 100 at the exclusion area boundary will be evaluated in the Design Basis Event phase of the SEP review.
V.
EVALUATION The Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (0CNGS) is located in Lacey Township, Ocean County, New Jersey, approximately nine miles south of Toms River, New Jersey, 35 miles north of Atlantic City, New Jersey, 45 miles east of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and 50 miles south of Newark, New Jersey.
The station is located on a 1416 acre property owned by Jersey Central Power and Light Company. The site is bounded on the west by the Garden State Parkway and on the east by the bay. This corresponds to a width of approx-imately 3 1/2 miles from east to west. The maximum width in the north-south direction is almost 1 mile.
U.S. Route 9 divides the property, with 755 acres lying west of the highway and 661 acres lying east of the highway.
The station is about 1/4 mile west of the U.S. Route 9 and 1 1/4 miles east of the Garden State Parkway.
3 i
Th2 reactor (center line) is located 1358 feet west of the east boundary of U.S. Route 9 which is the minimum exclusion distance, as defined in 10 CFR Part 100.3. All land areas, including mineral rights within the exclusion area, are owned by the licensee.
Parts of the exclusion area are traversed by U.S. Route 9 and Central i
Railroad of New Jersey. Arrangements.have been made with the New Jersey State Police and Lacey Township Police Department, to control traffic on i
U.S. Route 9 in the event of a plant emergency, as part of the OCNGS Emergency Plan.1,2,3 Similar arrangements have not been made with the railroad line to control traffic under emergency conditions, however, the i
need no longer exists since the railroad tracks have been removed.
l A natural gas pipeline also traverses the exclusion area. There are no j
written agreements with New Jersey Natural Gas Company to assure that the ifcensee has authority and control with respect to any construction, i
maintenance, or operation activities over that portion of the pipeline j
that would traverse the periphery of the exclusion area. However, since the pipeline just passes the edge of the exclusion area we have determined that the pipeline poses no significant hazard to the plant due to the-1 i
distance and that the licensee does not need authority to control the pipeline.
-l The only waterway traversing the exclusion area is the OCNGS intake and di:; charge canal. Station security measures are enforced to ensure un-authorized activity does not occur in this waterway.
VI.
CONCLUSIONS Based on the above evaluation we conclude 5that the licensee has the proper authority to determine all activities within the exclusion area, as re-quired by 10 CFR Part 100.
This completes the evaluation of this SEP topic.
VII.
REFERENCES 1.
Letter to Mr. Jack F. Riggar, Jersey Central Power &-Light Company..from Mr. S. Ferreri. New Jersey State Police, November 6,1980.
2.
Letter to Mr. J. F. Riggar, Jersey Central Power & Light Company, from Mr. Thomas R. Damody, Lacey Township Police Department, October-9,1979.
3.
Letter to Mr. J. F. Riggar, Jersey Central Power. & Light Company, from Mr. Thomas R. Darmody, Lacey Township Police Department. December.18,1980.
1
SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM TOPIC II-1.8 OYSTER CREEK TOPIC:
II-1.B. Population Distribution I.
INTRODUCTION The safety objective of this topic is to ensure that the previously-established low population zone and population center distance specified for the-site are compatible with the current population distribution, and are in accordance with the guidelines of 10 CFR Part 100.
II.
REVIEW CRITERIA Sections 100.10 and 100.11 of 10 CFR Part 100, " Reactor Site Criteria" provides the site evaluation factors which should be considered when evaluating sites for nuclear power reactors. These sections include guidelines for determining the exclusion area, low population zone and population center distance.
III.
RELATED SAFETY TOPICS Topic II-1. A, reviews the licensee's control over the exclusion area.
Various other topics will evaluate the capability of the plant to meet the dose criteria of 10 CFR Part 100 at the exclusion area boundary and low population zone. The adequacy of emergency preparedness planning for th'e area surrounding the plant including the low population zone is being assessed by the Commission in a separate review effort.
IV.
REVIEW GUIDELINES The review has been conducted in accordance with Standard Review Plan (SRP) Section 2.1.3, " Population Distribution".
V.
EVALUATION The Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station (OCNGS) is located in Ocean County, New Jersey, approximately nine miles south of the town of Toms River.
The site is bounded on the nortta and south by undeveloped land and on the west by the Garden State Parkway.
The region surrounding the plant is ch1racterized by flat terrain, sandy soils, and numerous freshwater and saltwater marshlands. Two barrier beaches, Seaside Peninsula and Long Beach Island, extend the length of the county providing extensive recreational opportunities on their beaches and bays. These attract a large transient seasonal population.
. The licensee has recently completed a survey of the population within a ten mile radius of the plant in conjunctior. with emergency planning activitiesl.
Based on preliminary 1980 census figures the permanent resident population within a ten mile radius of the OCNGS is 66,815.
The permanent resident population distribution within ten miles of the site is shown in Table 1.
The average permanent resident household size within this area is estimated to be 2.68 based on county-wide averages from the 1980 preliminary census figures.
The low population zone for the OCNGS has a distance of 0.75 miles to its outer boundary. The permanent population residing within one mile of the site and encompassing the low population zone is estimated to be 440 based on the recent survey.
The majority of these residences are located northeast and southeast of the site.
Prevjous population esti-mates identified 226 people residing within one mile of the plant in 1970 and projected a -population of 1,228 for the year 2010. There are 2
no schools or recreational areas within the 0.75 mile low population zone. The nearest population center containing more than 25,000 resi-dents is Dover Township, Gilford Park, and several smaller communities.
The 1980 population was approximately 64,445. Table 2 shows the popula-tion distribution from 10 to 50 miles from OCNGS.
The transient population within ten miles of the OCNGS is overwhelmingly a sedsonal tourist and tourist-related population.
There are numerous popular New Jersey shore communities in this area. As a result, there is a seasonal shift in populations within a 5-10 mile radius of the OCNGS which is concentrated in the northeast and southeast sectors due to the proximity to the Atlantic Ocean and Barnegat Bay. The peak seasonal population (defined as the sum total of permanent and transient population groups on an average day during the peak summer season) within a ten mile radius of the plant is expected to be 179,840.
Other than the tourist industry, there are no other significant employment opportunities within a ten mile radius of the plant. Thirty-four percent of the labor force commutes outside of Ocean county and it is estimated that at least another forty percent of the labor force residing within the ten mile radius is employed outside this area 3, VI.
CONCLUSION The staff concludes that the low population zone and population center distances specified for the Oyster Creek site is in conformance with the requirements of 10 CFR Part 100 in that the population center distance is more than one and one-third times the distance from the reactor to the outer boundary of the low population zone (95 miles vs. 75 miles).
We further conclude that the site conforms to the current licensing cri-teria. This completes the evaluation of SEP Topic II-1.B.
L
3-VI.
REFERENCES 1.
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station--Emergency Plan,1981.
2.
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station--Environmental Report, March 1972.
3.
Dresdner Associates, confirmed by William Hayes, Ocean County Emergency Management Coordinator.
i f
-a x
,r.,,-,
un..
-n,_
7,.
-.g.--
.-7 e
7 r
TABL7.R R
I POPUIATION BY SECTOR AND DISTANCE
.(0 - 10 MILES)
' DISTANCE
- DISTANCE'
- DISTANCE
- DISTANCE
- DISTANCE
- DISTANCE
- DISTANCE
- DISTANCE
- DISTANCE
- DISTM*CE SECTOR 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6
' 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 N
O 522 2,188 665 93 337 459 3,232 8,369 3,572 10iE 151 551 1,198 884 743 855 1,252 4,130 3,428 3.214 lie 151 368
- 465, 747 1,772 435 353 120 15 1,030 C;E O
641 135 856 16 0
0 4
0 0
E O
595 135 0
0 0
6 0
0 0
ESE 69 484 0
0 0
0 4
0 0
d SE 69 394 0
0.
0 58 706 79 0
0 SSE O
325 344 118 0
0 0
145
?l6 204 5
0 325 609 1,402 1,125 166 0
28 28 227 SSW 0
0 65 393 806 3,394 0
0 2,847 1,038 SW 0
0 0
22 714 1,884 1,896 895 2
58 k'SW 0
0 0
9 21 17 272 158 110 74 U
0 0
0 0
0 5
0 10 22 3
kin 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 IM 0
0 0
0 0
0 30 129 160 95 ION O
80 693 0
0 0
1 0
0 0
TOTAL 440-4,285 5,832 5.096 5,290 7,151 4,979 8,930 15,297 9,515
- Miles From Facility
(*
R h,
=
TABI.E 2 POPULATION BY SECTOR AND DISTANCE (10 - 50 !!ILES)
- DISTANCE
- DISTMICE
- DISTANCE
- DISTANCE
- DISTANCE
- DISTANCE
- DISTANCE
- DISTANCE SECTOR 10-15 15-20 20-25 25-30 30-35 35-40 40-45 45-50 TOTALS N
23,937 51,847 21,735 28,824 40,507 73,080 131,688 166,853 538,471 1mE 19,212 46,014 -
32,362 63,061 58,542 41,785 7,789 268,765 NE.
D;E '
E -0 ESE
- SE ;
SSE. S 4,704 3,05'2 172 7,928 SSW 1,837 6,247 2,835 7,462 50,066 49,141 21,132 9,622 148,942 s
SW 1,794 884 401 7,418 9,288 3,555 1,181 12,503 37,024 1:5.i 355 475 779 4,938 11,872 16,394 25,805 46,024 106,642 W
457 457 3,274 6,382 22,272 73,096 163,192 189,464 458,594 1?:N 5,496 9,077 20,087 19,345 27,955 115,414 108,152 558,300 863,826
!N 5,382 6,642 9,639 10,425 47,364 103,222 172,102 62,456 417,232 IqN 10,349 11,245 8,962 16,070 31,378 51,085 75,549 153,553 362,191 TOTAL 73,5'23.
135,940 100,246 163,925 299,844 526,772 710.590 1,198,775 3.209,615
- 7tilen From Facility
SYSTEMATIC EVALUATION PROGRAM TOPIC II-l.C OYSTER CREEK TOPIC:
II-1.C, Potential Hazards Due to Nearby Transportation Institutional Industrial and Military Facilities I.
INTRODUCTION The safety objective of this topic is to ensure that the integrity of the safety-related structures, systems and components would not be jeopardized due to the potential for hazards originating at nearby facilities.
II.
REVIEW CRITERIA General Design Criterion 4. " Environmental and Missile Design Basis",
of Appendix A, " General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants", to 10 CFR Part 50, " Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities"*,
requires that nuclear power plant structures, systems and components important to safety be appropriately protected against events and con-ditions that may occur outside the nuclear power plant.
III.
RELATED SAFETY TOPICS Topic III-4.0, " Site Proximity Missiles" reviews the extent to which the facility is protected against missiles originating from offsite facilities.
IV.
REVIEW GUIDELINES The review was conducted inaccordance with the guidance given in Standard Review Plan (SRP) Section 2.2.1-2.2.2, " Identification of Potential Hazards in Site Vicinity".
V.
EVALUATION Ocean County's industrial base is small, but diversified. Boat building and marine equipment manufacturing were once the dominant industrial act-ivities, but today industrial activity also includes chemical manufacturing, mining of ilmenite, quarrying of industrial sands, garment manufacturing, food processing, and concrete production.
Table 1 identifies industrial locations within ten miles of the plant site.
The nearest transportation route to the station is U.S. Route 9 which is located approximately 0.25 miles east of the reactor building. The licensee has made an extensive effort to determine the shipping frequency of explosive
[
, materials on U.S. Route 9 in the vicinity of the Oyster Creek Plant Site.
Contacts were made with the Lacey Township Police Department.I New Jersey State Police,2 New Jersey Dep Department of Transportation.grtment of Transportation 3 and the U.S.
All these agencies said that no records are kept of the shipping frequencies of explosive materials or of the routes used by the carriers.
However, Route 9 is not heavily used for shipping in the locality. As shown in Table 1, there are no industries in close proximity to the plant site that can be expected to use or store large amounts of explosive or hazardous material.
Additionally, Route 9 is a local road with many traffic lights and low speed limits, especially where it passes through towns. Through traffic generally uses the Garden State Parkway, a limited access toll road that runs paralled to Route 9.
The parkway is about 1.25 miles west of the plant and is open to truck traffic.
For this reason, we conclude that transportation of hazardous materials on U.S. Route 9 poses no significant hazard to the plant.
The Garden State Parkway is about 1.25 miles west of the plant and forms the western boundary of the site.
The separation distance between the highway and the plant exceeds the minimum distance criteria given in the regulatory guide for truck-size shipments of explosive materials.
It is expected that an explosive accident on the highway will not affect safe operation of the plant.
The licensee has reviewed the present status of transport of hazardous chemicals in the vicinity of OCNGS.
Contacts similar in nature to those made regarding shipments of explosive materials on U.S. Route 9 with local state and federal agencies did not reveal any records of the shipping fre-quency or routing information for the movements of hazardous chemicals in the vicinity of the plant site. We believe that these shipments are also largely confined to the Garden State Parkway. Therefore, we conclude that the potential hazard associated with the shipment of hazardous chemicals near the plant site is acceptably low.
The nearest railroad corridor is approximately 0.25 miles east of the reac-tor building.
Rail traffic through this corridor is discontinued and the railroad tracks have been re1oved.
There are no large commercial harbors within ten miles of the site.
Public mariras are the chief recreational facilities in the immediate site area.
The Intracoastal Waterway is the only inland waterway used for shipping in the area. Major shipping lanes in the Atlantic Ocean are located well off-shore.
L
. Both the Intracoastal Waterway and the Atlantic Ocean are over 20,000 ft.
east of the. plant. This separation distance exceeds the minimum distance criteria given in the regulatory guide for ship-sized shipments of explo-sive material.
The U.S. Coast Guard (U.S.C.G.) does not keep records of ship movements in either the Atlantic Ocean or the Intracoastal Waterway. However, they have stated in telephone conversation with the licensee that there are no ship-ping lanes or traffic separation schemes along the New Jersey coast and that there is no reason for any cargo vessel to come closer than 15 miles to the coast in the vicinity of the OCNGS.
In addition, ship movements in the Intracoastal Waterway are severely limited by the six foot mean low water depth.
Although the U.S.C.G. does not keep records of general ship movements, they do require a permit (pursuant to 33 CFR Part 126) for the loading or unload-ing of hazardous material and for the transport of explosives. A search of the U.S.C.G. files found no permit issued for this type of activity within a ten mile radius of the plant site.5 For these reasons, we conclude that shipping does not pose a hazard to the plant.
The nearest pipelines to the plant lie in a corridor along U.S. Route 9 approximately 0.25 miles from tge plant.
These consist of an 8" and 6" diameter natural gas pipelines.
As noted in SEP Topic II-1.A the pipe-lines pass through the edge of the exclusion area boundary. Therefore, we conclude that the pipelines do not pose a significant hazard to the plant due to the distance involved.
There are plans to install an additional pipeline at some future date.
However, details concerning size, opfating pressure and expected completion date are not available at this time There are no missile sites within a ten mile radius of the OCNGS site.
Nine airfields are located within 20 miles of the plant (Figure 1). Two of the airfields are military installations: McGuire Air Force Base, also used by the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Air National Guard, and the Military Air Transport Service (MATS) 25 miles to the NW, and Lakehurst Naval Air Station, 20 miles NNW. Other airports listed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) are Breton Woods,17 miles north; Eagle's Nest,12 miles SSW; Coyle Tower,10 miles west; Ocean County, 9 miles NNW; Manahawkin, 9 miles SSW; and Beechwood, 8 miles NNE.
In addition, there is a sod strip 2 miles NE at Forked River.
The FAA lists three restricted areas in the vicinity of the plant. Two of these areas, R5001 A and R5001B are contiguous near Fort Dix,15 miles to the NNW. These restricted areas are used mainly as firing ranges for small arms, artillery, and mortars. The third area, R5002, at Warren Grove is a low-level aerial target range used by the Air National Guard.
Its closest
. i boundary to the plant is 7.5 miles. Bombs.: rockets,. and 20 mm gun fire are used in the target range. The bombs' are dummies that give off a flash, but no; explosive charge. The rockets do not have explosive charges, only a propellant to deliver the rocket on target and the 20.
mm shells have solid heads without explosives.
The only air corridor in the vicinity of.the site,9 is a civilian i
8 corridor marked. " Victor Air Lane 312", which is aligned east-west and l
passess over the site.
The airlane can be used by all types of aircraft, but the FAA - which controls all civilian aviation - specifies minimum safe altitudes at which planes can be flown in the corridor.
An evaluation of the potential hazard due to nearby aviation will be pre-sented as part of SEP Topic III-4.D, " Site Proximity Missiles (Including Aircraft)".
VI.
CONCLUSIONS We have concluded that Oyster Creek is adequately protected and can be operated with an acceptable degree of safety with regard to industrial, transportation, and military activities in the. vicinity of the plant.
Therefore, we conclude,that Topic II-1.C is complete.
VII.
REFERENCES 1.
Telephone conversation with Chief Darmody, Lacey Township Police De-partment and Mr. R. Cahayla-Wynne, GPU Nuclear, October 29, 1981.
2.
Telephone conversation with Sergeant Sgourakis, New Jersey State Police and Mr. R. Cahayla-Wynne, GPU Nuclear, October 29, 1981.
3.
Telephone conversation with Mr. Potash, New Jersey Department of Trans-portation and Mr. R. Cahayla-Wynne, GPU Nuclear November 4,1981.
4.
Telephone conversation with Mr. Savard, U.S. Department of Transportation and Mr. R. Cahayla-Wynne, GPU Nuclear, November 5,1981.
5.
Telephone conversation with Ms. Black, U.S. Coast Guard, Port of Phil-adelphia and Mr. R. Cahayla-Wynne, GPU Nuclear, October 27, 1981.
6.
Telephone conversation with Mr. Glenn Maver..New Jersey Natural Gas l
Company and Mr. G. J. Mencinsky, GPU Nuclear, November 18, 1981.
7.
Letter from Mr. Glenn Mayer, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, to Mr. G. J. Mencinsky, GPU Service Corp., May 4,1981.
i 8.
Telephone conversation with Mr. Jay Johnson, FAA, and Mr. G. J. Mencinsky, GPU Nuclear, October 27, 1 981.
l 9.
Telephone conversation with Major Simmer, Chief of Traffic Operations, McGuire Air Force Base, and Mr. G. J. Mencinsky, GPU Nuclear, October 28, 1 981.
L.
. ~. - -
TABLE 1 Distance Direction Numbc.
Crmmunity From The From Name of Company Industry of Site (Mi.)
The Site Dnploy-Gernegat 4
South Research Products Corp Dental Supplies 10 Heatherproof Alu:ninum, Inc.
Storm Windows 6
Oryville 7
NNE Berkeley Machine Shop, Inc.
Machine Shop 12 Denzer-Schafer X-Ray Co., Inc.
Silver Recovery 9
New Jersey Pulverizing Co.
Sand Products 66 Rainbow Sportswear Corp.
Sportswear Woodland Manuf acturing Co.
Wrought Iron 30 Pina Beach 9
North Castle Woodcraft Kitchen Cabinets B
Tch River 9
North Best Block of Toms River Concrete Blocks 15 9
North New Jersey Glovrier, Inc.
Newspaper 15 Trilco Terminal Building Materials 37 10 North Acme Cabinet Corp.
Cabinets 77 Delta Lumber Co., Inc.
Lumber 15 Fischer's Machine Works Machinists 6
Glover, B. Clay Co., Inc.
Pet Shop 21 Marban Construction Co.
Partition Walls 6
Ocean County Sun, Inc.
Newspaper 25 Quality Alu:nintrn Products Co.
Alu:ninu:n Products 10 Reardon Conpany Paints 22 Rochelle Novelty Co.
Shoe Sags 10 Toms River Boat Works Ship Construction 20 Toms River Chemical Corp.
Dyes 1126 Towne Fabrics, Inc.
Fabrics 23 Source:
1971 New Jersey State Industrial Directory e
- o,.n.;% g' p. c -
. p.e n.. q A~.0',
/ W">;" c e
p L.. jf, 9, x...
e$.a,j,
.* :. 9 i
.s
.n -
x m..,,
,u..
- ..,..,.,i
)>
. -,-* *?.c
- O l'.
,a.. f,.: : i
.f.,
j' %.'\\
su.
, - =,3 O
' y\\
i g
g s
3
-[/..*
'. ' 3[ '[:* * /.
-l f.. i
/
'l
/
/,
w.
- ,s j
,e 'k
.,A (V,
s s.
t
,' ?
/
.s g
.t e*.
.~
.... j.
~
.. y e
,'.s s
's..i :1 oO
, p c.. /
l
. ' t 0 '-
s m
.1.''
p -
.b~~~~~~
... ?
...... w c,
.:Y,b** t,'
'.',..,.e,, l ' ' *"*. I
./
e L
. s
~.
g
.e
<. e...
. = - - -...
O
,8'-/ y*(* *.e. [..pis
...o.
M
,s...,,.).',',
., c,, e. e.
L SW'$
- s.4
.,,3.,
,I.
\\
\\w
,,,g u
=.
d ag s 29
- i..~ g i p e. g. f,
,a,
.c.
v....t o
n s
's.-,..,
e n.u,a.,' N 1:
..y
\\
y s.'s, u
\\
r.,.,...,
'il :
y
,,.'a t IN
.(
g i
.=
N-s /,
,,l..
- sirs,
.x y
,v.. -
s o ~~.
p *.
.g. ;;",; -
_',. / -
e ;.,,
m.
m\\
. / )
,,.,.t.,s e som a em t ass 4lsme e se a a ses e su,s a sus e,um
( ' _, g....... --
,, / s\\,
M T
J 's
'N, i
- n' ~ ' y /~
\\
.= -
.)/
.. e o : -
3 s.
.J,-.
j5
', b~.[, ,\\,.
\\
8' '
L q,.s.
d.?' ' '.'/ \\. I...I..'
\\./, \\
' @'s/
c
?
)
' ' * * " H ".
\\,". \\ c..... /
/>
/\\
s?
./
.n
./.....
.e
)
7 4* n v W.
)., '
\\u.', g,...
3 s.
)
l
.p'
.? */." j' ' )j
.,, ', ~
t.
,)
'\\
\\
s, c..
P
.Js,,
W t:
f
- . 4-
.i. ! %,N
- NI,. q.
'Q
't(.'-
- ', f /"/
y A
O-
'a L/
7, 2
/
/ 1%
s l'
~ l y.! R l Q l i%y \\
Q',h..
.~
~<.. D '
r?
/' Q'
.\\
.i
\\,.
)
Q.)'X.,:_l.
'.t'
.s.k...-
lI
..f.
t,,. ';
/
.\\.
7 e.....
.... f,
-Qy s.
- l,
.r.:r yl x
i u,. '
- l
.4 s3
/
..p..... -
..i,
,,,,'s..'..
. h
.t.,, g1....<
/. -.
.t.1 1
4
^l s.* K ' " ' <>..
%.. ~..
.I 0
20 MI,I.E RA8118'h
?
'... 'd 1
STATUTE asetts S
S so tL L.& 60L...
____ a E EY:
r' O. A ia m a
oysTcR cneex
&/
R L C T RIC T E T) AREA 5 NUCLEAR d
l GENERATING V
= =..
t.O W t.E V El. AI R R OLI TE S STATION se n,e..s.e..e s.,s.v.e. s t
.m.
vicroR AR i.AhC als LOCATION OF AIRPORTS,'
.)
RESTRIC' LED AREAS, AND AIR ROUTES es eea,e.eeg.ase hee *0.s.
FIGURE 1
_ - _ _ -