ML20040C237
| ML20040C237 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 10/30/1981 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20040C222 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-413-81-21, NUDOCS 8201270439 | |
| Download: ML20040C237 (1) | |
Text
...
r.
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company Docket No. 50-413 Catawba 1 License No. CPPR-116 '
As a result of the inspection conducted on September 29 - October 2,1981, and 'n accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980),
the following violation was identified.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by PSAR Section 17.1.5.2, in part, requires activities-affecting quality shall be prescribed-by docu-mented... procedures...and shall be accomplished in accordance with these...
procedures.
Contrary to the above, cable was installed in accordance with Duke Procedure -
M418, but was not documented procerly.
a.
On September 30, 1981, cable 1*RN624 was found not routed as detailed on the cable pulling card, but had been signed off by the QC inspector.
b.
On October 2, 1981, cable 1*WN502'was found not routed as detailed on the cable pulling card, bet had been signed off by the QC inspectc,r.
This is a Severity Level VI Violation (jupplement II.F).
~
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you-are hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged viola-tion; (2) the reasons for the violation if admitted; (3) the corn.ctive steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will
'be achieved., Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall-be submitted under oath or affirmation.
i The responses directed by this Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwor,k Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
I OCT 30 w81 i
Date:
i 8201270439 811229 PDR ADOCK 05000413 O
PDR.
r
,f UNITED STATES
.8 4't NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
REGION 11 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W., SUITE 3100 f
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 4***
Report Nos. 50-413/81-21 and 50-414/81-21 Licensee:
Duke Power Company
[
422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Facility Name: Catawba 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-413 and 50-414 License Nos. CPPR-116 and CPPR-117 Inspection at Catawba Site near Rock Hill, SC Inspector:
_[
[
d
////>J /
. D. Gibbont W'
06te Signed
- Approved' by-v$
//bjlJV T. E. Conlod, dectJ6n/ Chief D6te Signed
. Engineering Inspection Branch Engineering and Technical Inspection Division
SUMMARY
Inspection on September 29 - October 2,1981 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 28 inspector-hours on site in the areas of independent inspection, instrumentation cable and termination work, and quality records, instrumentation components and systems work and quality records.
Results Of the five areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified in four areas; one violation was found in one area (Cable routed contrary to the cable routing card, paragraph 6).
m
REPORT DETAILS 1.
Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- J. C. Rogers, Site Manager
' 3. W. Dressler, Project Construction Engineer "R. A. Morgan, Project QA Engineer "W. O. Henry, Technican Services QA Manager
- J. C. Sh opshire, QA Engiaeer
- 0. A. Jenkins, QA Technician Electrical NRC Resident Inspector
- P. K. Van Doorn
- Attended exit interview 2.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on October 2,1981 with
-those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The violation was discussed in depth. The licensee agreed to investigate the item.
3.
Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected.
4.
Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection.
5.
Independent Inspection Effort The inspector conducted a walk through inspection of the Nuclear Service Water Pump structure examining the installation of electrical equipment and cable installation.
Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.
6.
Instrumentation (Cable and Terminations) Observation of Work and Work Activities (Unit 1)
The inspector selected thirteen instrumentation cables to assure compliance to the SAR and QAM. The cables selected were 1*NC631, 1*RN624, 1*RN634, 1*RN636, 1*RN757, 1*RN758, 1*RN759, 1*RN760, 1*WN501, 1*WN502, 1*WZ52B, 1*WZ529 and 1*WL790. The cables were examined in the areas of storage
__- __ _ - _____ - __- -_ _ -_ w
- ~.
2 i
4 handling, identification, use of specified material, inspection procedures, work performance, size and type of cable, location, routing, protection separation, raceway identification, raceway. loading, cable terminations and nonconformance control.
The inspector identified two examples of failure to properly document the routing of cable. Cable 1*RN624 and 1*WN502 were found to be installed and inspected without completing the required route. This is a violation which will be identified as 413/81-21-01 Cable Route Contrary to the Cable Routing Card.
The licensee issued Nonconforming Item Reports 12962 and 12973 covering the violation.
Further review by the licensee identified that the procedure M418 serial 9 was revised to include an inspection to verify the starting and finishing junction points on the M41B Serial 15 termination inspection.
This-change was made in October 1981. The cables were installed prior to the change.
The licensee identified that in both cases the original location for the device was not the final location.
The apparent cause is the moving of instrumentation without adequate communications to the cable design group.
j Other than the violation identified above there were no other violations identified.
7.
Instrumentation (Cables and-Terminations I) Review of Quality Records (Unit I) i The inspector selected the cables identified in paragraph 6 for a quality records review. The records were examined to assure compliance with the SAR and QAM requirements in the areas of receiving inspection, acceptance, i
vendor test reports, mill test reports, size, type of cable, location, routing, identification of raceway cable bulling records, terminations and nonconformance control.
Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.
8.
Instrumentation (Components and System) Observation of Work and Work Activities (Unit 1)
The inspector examined three solenoid valves (1RN094,1RN187 and 1RN190) and 4
one level transmitter 1RN737 to assure compliance to the SAR and QAM requirements in the areas of identification location, supports, protection, inspection, independence and nonconformance control.
Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.
1 i
l 3
9.
Instrumentation (Components and Systems I) Review of Quality Records The inspector selected the items identified in paragraph 8 for a quality records review. The items were examined to assure compliance to the SAR and QAM requirements in the areas of raceway inspection, material certifica-tions, vendor test reports, storage, handling, cleanliness installation, installation inspection, anchoring, bracing and nonconformance control.
Within the areas examined there were no violations identified.
._