ML20040C027

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Containment Purge/Vent Sys,Including Discussion of Provisions to Insure That Isolation Valve Closure Will Not Be Prevented by Debris from Escaping Air & Steam.Info Requested within 30 Days
ML20040C027
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 01/04/1982
From: Crutchfield D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Finfrock I
JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
LSO5-82-01-001, LSO5-82-1-1, NUDOCS 8201270181
Download: ML20040C027 (2)


Text

%

DISTRIBUTION 00cke January 4,1982

' NR Lcoal PDR N

ORB Reading NSIC s

8 DCrutchfield g

HSmith Docket No. 50-219

[

itECB N JLombardo 7

mM6 1982>.

OELD LS05-82-01-001 OI&E (3)

D d r yce [a )

CR (10)

Mr. I. R. Finfrock, Jr.

c.

DShum j

p Vice President Jersey Central Power & Light CompanyY' Post Office Box 388 Fcrked River, New Jersey 08731

Dear Mr. Finfrock:

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - CONTAINMENT VENT / PURGE SYSTEM - OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION We have reviewed your submittals on the Containment Vent / Purge System and find that before we can complete our review additional information is required as indicated in the enclosure. We request that you pro-vide this infonnation to us within 30 days of receipt of this letter.

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, uMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511.

Sincerely, Original signed by Walter A. Paulson for/

Dennis M. Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #5 Division of Licensing Enclosure Request for Additional Information cc w/ enclosure:

See next page 8201270181 G20104 PDR ADOCK 05000219 i

P pyn hlT/

\\

.1 n

.RQ.;.9.l.SA....

N.N.N..e5....

2M...

D ome, >.0L:..o u..t..c.h..f..i.e..l.d..

........n a s SURNAME)

J.L..o.m...b.a..r..

.................... ~

.a..a a. a... a an.

an.

.~....aa.=*a.*

..f.4-3.0.d.l... n+ 3.l...

.. 6 V %......

o rc >

.........a..~...

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY umm asi-awneo snc ronu sia omeon nacu cao 1

E Mr. I. R. Finfrock January 4,1982 CC G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire Resident Inspector Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge c/o U. S. NRC 1800 M Street, N. W.

Post Office Box 445 Washington, D. C.

2C036 Forked River, New Jersey 08731 J. B. Lieberman, Esquire Commissioner Berlack, Israels & Lieberman New Jersey Department of Energy 26 Broadway 101 Conmerce Street New York, New York 10004 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Natural Resources Defense Council 91715th Street, N. W.

Washington, D. C, 20006

'J. Knubel BWR Licensing Manager GPU Nuclear 100 Interplace Parkway Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 Deputy Attorney General State of New Jersey Department of Law and Public Safety 36 West State Street - CN 112 Trenton, New Jersey 08625 M's. Phyllis Haefner 101 Washington Street Toms River, New Jersey 08753 Mayor l

Lacey Township l

818 Lacey Road Forked River, New Jersey 08731 i

U. S. Environmental Protection l

Agency Region II Office ATTN: Regional Radiation Representative 26 Federal Plaza New York, New York 10007 Licensing Supervisor Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Post Office Box 388 Forked River, New Jersey 08731

9 ENCLOSURE e

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTAINMENT PURGE / VENT SYSTEM OYSTER CREEK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCKET NO. 50-219 1.

It is our recommendation that you cc:nmit to limiting the use of the purge / vent system to a specified annual time commensurate with plant operational. safety needs.

Provide such a commitment or justification why such a limitation is considered unnecessary.

2.

Provide a discussion of the provisions to insure that isolation valve closure will not be prevented by debris which could potentially become entrained in the escaping air and steam.

Installation of debris screens is one acceptable method of accomplishing this function.

If no provisions are considered necessary provide infor-mation to justify this conclusion.

3.

We request that you propose Technical Specification changes incorpor-ating test requirements together with the details of your proposed test program.

If the results of current and past surveillance and operating experience are believed to demonstrate leak tightness of those valves, provide this information as justification for not modifying the surveillance requirements.

4.

Provide information concerning the provisions to protect structures and safety-related equipment (e.g. SBGT) located downstream of the purge isolation valves against loss of function from the environment created by the escaping air and steam following a LOCA.

5.

Provide an analysis of airborne radiation released to the environment prior to purge system isolation following a LOCA.