Text

Provides Status of Program Described in Feb 1981 Meeting to Improves Organization of Nuclear Operations Dept. Organizational Changes Are Presented in Encl marked-up FSAR Pages.Changes to Be Incorporated in FSAR Amend 29
	ML20040B261
Person / Time
Site:	Summer
Issue date:	01/15/1982
From:	Nichols T; SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO.
To:	Harold Denton; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	NUDOCS 8201250324
	Download: ML20040B261 (102)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:. O SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY //M mst o,, a on, m CotumeiA, south C AROLIN A 29218 T C thcHots.Ja. January 15, 1982 b Q, / 3,] u. e.,, m,..u.- o, %, m,

w..... cs....,s..

Uv \\l, 7; p*l 't [zy \\ d.. Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director O Office of Nuclear Reactor Pegulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Conmission / /,fT g, g Washington, D. C. 20555

Subject:

Virgil C. Summer thiclear Station Docket No. 50/395 SCE&G Organization

Dear Mr. Denton:

South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (SCE&G) m3t with the NRC staff in late Ebbruary 1981 anl describal an evolving long tenn proJram to improve the organization of the Nuclear Operations Department in supprt of operation of the Virgil C. Summr Nuclear Station. We pirpose of this letter is to provide you with a status of this proJram an3 sane changes to it that have developal since that meeting. In review, a NRC audit was held in early Ibbruary 1981 to review the SCE&G organization anl to describe short-tenn changes to m3et NRC rapirunents. Subso pent to that, a meeting was held to discuss the lonJ tenn proJram for upJrading the SCE&G organization. A March 4, 1981 letter was written in response to describe the aJreanents reachal at the rmeting. Supplamnt 1 to the Safety Evaluation Reprt (SER) providal the Staff's evaluation of the onJanization. Changes, in aldition to those describal in that letter, have been and continue to ha implamntal to achieve that goal. SER Supplomat i has been reviewul carefully. We changes describyl are consistent with the evaluation in the SER and the agreamnts male at the meeting. Briefly, the changes involve:

1) Creation of a corporate onJanization healal by a group nunager respansible for the developmnt, implementation, anl evaluation of operating and technical training IroJrains for the thiclear Operations Department.

By reporting directly t 0 the Vice President, Group Executive, Nuclear Operations the 303 stature of the corp 3 rate training function will be upgraded. This change najates the neal for the interim training lf organization describal in our May 13, 1981 letter and the neol to retain the services, on a contractural hisis, of a representative of Westinghouse to serve on the staff of the Vice President, Group Executive, Nuclear Operations.

2) The supervisory responsibility for plant quality control has bmn shif tol fran the plant manager to the Group KinaJer, Nuclear Services. This change is consistent with organizations acceptable to the Staff and has b2en discussel

( with the Staff Ireviously. 8201250324 820115 PDR ADOCK 05000395 A ( PDR

) Mr. Ilarold R. Dmton January 15, 1982 l Page 2 l

3) The plant manaJerial an1 sup3rvisory positions have luen restructural to better support the Ibnager, Virgil C. Sunmer Nuclear Station aryl to intter distribute the resp)nsibilities of th) plant. A Dyuty Manager aryl four assistant m1 nager Insitions were creatal to achieve this.

D! tails of the alnve changes are presental in the attachel markel up FSAR piges. They will in incorporatal in FSAR amendmant 29. In aklition to the alove, the implainntation of these changes has allowul SCE&G to proccol in a slightly alternative direction in supplainntiny the cortnrate staff than describal in earlier communications. With the revisol organization a p3rson exp3riencol in traininj has been hirol on a full tima bTsis anl the services of one ptrt time p2rsonnel with nuclear exparience (Mr. Michael E. Stern) has been contractol. Mr. Stern rep 3rts directly to the Vice Presillent, Group Fxecutive, Nuclear Operationc and is a voting n5nlur on the Nuclear Safety Review Ca:mittee. This provides stronger input and strenghtens the morall safety [31ilosophy of the Company. If you have any questions, please let us know. Very truly yours, f f/ ' / / 1 T. C. Nichols, Jr. RIC:'ICN:1kb Attaclinent cc: V. C. Suimer T. C. Nichols, Jr. G. II. Fischer

11. N. Cyruc II. T. Ibbb D. A. Naurmv1 M. B. Whitaker, Jr.

W. A. Williams, Jr. O. S. Bralham R. B. Clar,y M. N. Hmwne A. R. Koon G. J. Braldick J. L. Skolds J. B. Knotts, Jr. B. A. Ihlrsey J. C. Ruoff NIUP Pile

13.1.1.2.1 Scuch Carolinn Elcctric cnd G s Ccmpany ~ N Corporate Management' s The SCE&G corporate organization for handling all matters pertaining to the Virgil C. Su==er Nuclear Station. ~ neluding design, procurement, rutini 'g construction,qualityassurance,testingangoperation,isshownin c, Figure 13.1-3. The departments primarily involved with plant activities and their relationships are described below.

.L.:

O The 'Vice-President and Group Executive, Engineering and Construction, is responsible for the construction of power f acilities of the Applicant. The Engineering and Construction Department is separated into the Pro-duction Engineering Department and the Construction Department and is headed by the Group Manager, Production Engineering, QC, and Construc-ti on. The Group Manager, Production Engineering, QC, and Construction reports directly to the Vice-President and Group Executive, Engineering and Construction. ry r A-m o v a- *. Po.32 /.t. / f w'sh/M O-Gros? & #1& Q TheA uclear Engineering and Licensing D: y nx.: has the responsibility-s N for w W _ O g plant and equipment design; plant licensing; and u,etorm W health physics and environmental programs geologic and j { hydrologic studies relating to plant siting, design, construction and support of plant operations.

L - J Lj The Group Manager, Nuclear ggineeringandLicensing,.: zakereports to the Vice President and Group (Jvecutive, Nuclear Operations. '[his department is divided into four functional areas; Nuclear Engineering, Nuclear Licensing, the Independent Safety Engineering Group and Corporate Health Physics and Environmental Programs.

^ ( /The Construction Department has the responsibility for the construction I f uc.Y be v+ile tut be of power generating facilities andgmajor alterations to existing plants, including preliminary investigations, testing, surveying, and super-vising and coordinating the activities of the contractors. _ Gy<T h p< to n, I .f' m 13.1-4 AMENDMENT p L = ry, /98 2 ,, M

W5(Tica 1Frea t 4FintN biswep t.mcettvE, recTEar-Uper uE0aq--I3 3 responoible fcr th2 quality amourcnce, engineering, licensin "d operation of SCE6C nuclecr power ganarcting fccility. The General Manager, Nuclear Operations is responsible f or 5+4h*" 48"'8"" viclefs /* m ei n sfr.urr-ve s ~J test, t o ss'** asewin*, e.a nms.t f an,,,~ &, > 1&_a s. -'Li s e s 1 n f r 1 m ra -1 : 4 _= q ~& w3 e, soy Ph e.,sQs. \\ op. The General Manager, Nuclear Operations reports directly to the Vice President and Group Executive, Nuclear Operations. L/'h M The Group Manager, Nuclear Services is responsible w$n 1 pon Ihl 'i e the areas of ~ Nuc l e.)ar Fuel Management, incere technical support fuel cycle requireme esnd*and quality assurance relating to design, ons ruction and 24 a

r @yomfrel nAff b

e. eptreifaw o.n lear Station.J Oc

~ etas.ls o the operatio f th irgil C. Su er N a nOcht %** h Contt' Nah*' quality assuranceprogram:, are ound in Chapter 17, rL a C / #f aaf e'r ft"*de-r, Gre.or tva.< s. rose, Poslar Openrk.s, Unce sses:es> rs t*'rs J.<ur17 +e 1Le he General Manager, Purchasing, has the company wide responsibility f or ~ procurement of equipment and materials. This includes procurement of safety related items during design, construction and operations of SCE&G power facilities. Purchase requisitions f or the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station are initiated by personnel of the,lant staff, nuclear engineering, or purchasing. Additional information pertaining to procurement is found in Chapter 17. "NC roop Manogr h/oclear 6doeo. o,J a.n d T r a IS fon k j development,,,nple,nentd/,41,e% o.n J eval ud fukancal +ae.nv pro p s G e tiveleae operafim Deeartmenl ; a coorknedsa a)c% oe opec %g;f4 ^' rec ann,eddl o crenent wy.r gaae,r s on,, nn.g duelea< Engineersn3 an$ L;eensingjoe -fk Group M a a y,. n iluctur ser4ces, %e Gn>up / nan 9r, pocIcar. EL cdfo,, y %;a;ny reparis dira+ly 4 % l% presule,& an b G n,09 Exeche, goelear opensions. \\ l () from I), I ^ ( g \\ l des =M.zA +

% 9*uf &~yeq Ww kr 6")***uss"., s~/ Loenn as twordsJ/s h, ajor modTffect-inne-or similar acriviele=- + = -Mansp.. iiuhcr ] ~ ~ E 'n23 ring, is responsib'le fcr coordinating cnd appruvi d2 sign and implem engineering documents of o engineering organiza- .t,7 tions. The Construce 0- n = r m will be responsible for major modi fications, either the b-unck activities in the a manner as done f or the inicial vireil C. Su::nner Nuclear ~ ser r< < ~-j m s e e c e.oj -e woofs fo e.< rio,, @tation construction. ,,, 7, y f,,. m p,go,. g 4 HSE _

u. 3-m L iv.a 5 M is technical support group for the Virg1A J. ) y' shown in re 13.1-5.

This group is composed of the owing N tonNfelearEngineer individuals: F chnical Support Supervisor, 1-S with 1 (one) Reactor ' peer, 1-Lead Engi _,7-PlantEngineerswith3f [, Tt:cu a # c.,sp. 5 p=c.e,44,..s r5 N Computer Engineer, 1-Computer -Engi-eering Tc &'ic 2nc, 1-Pe. eman Program Analyst, 2-Computer S .talist- -Chemistry Supervisor, 22 2-Chemistry Foremen, 9-mistry Special -Technical Services Coordinator, and hif t Technical Advisors. The ec donal background / and experi requirements for identified positions or e of pos' ions are provided in the following sectinne-j_ /fut rAWr-Mnaa$erz. / 1. Section 13.1.3.1.9 for/ Technical Support ", -h 2. Section 13.1.3.1.10 for Station Nuclear Engineer ,21 3. Section 13.1.3.1.11 for Plant Engineer v,gectrosc.oo-4. Section 13.1. 3.1. 20 f orAchemistry Supe-u e er 2.3 5. Section 13.1.3.1. f or 'u : ? r-p -m Doze croc. or: 5,rc Egeaeeezij ~ 6. Section 13.1.3.1.Mr for Shif t Technical Advisor 22

7 Secfiog 13. t. 3.1. 2 -] bcior af TeMcal $cccc5 I

It is th e intent of the Applicant th a t the overall organization will comply with ANSI 18.1, Revision 3, 1976 or equivalent on or before ini-tial f uel loading. The. persons enumerated above are full time employees 2 of the Virgil C. Sumer Nuclear Station and devote 100 percent of their time to providing technical support services to th e facility. 7 i ) 7.3 13.1-15 AMENDMENT A2 '.gw sm _' = u: ~' g"'/, li S 2 a r.- i j

INSERT A - PAGE 13.1-15 The Technical Support Group for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station is shown in Figure 13.1-5. This group is composed as follows: 1-Assistant Manager Technical Support; l-Director of Chemistry with the Chemistry Group; 1-Director of Site Engineering with the Engineering Group; and 1-Director of Technical Services with the Shif t Technical Advisor Group, the, Station Nuclear Engineering Group, the Computer Group, and the Technical Services Group. The educational bpckground and experience requirements for identified key pos1(lons are provided in the following sections: I 0 0 0 D 4 e

tho Managar Virgil C. Su= mar Nuclocr Station, who 'rapcrts to tho G:narol 21 Menegar, Nucicar Operations. Tha Gsn2ral Man gcr, Nucicar Oporoticas reports to the Vice-President and Group Executive, Nuclear, Opera'tions. J..c. .g:_-_.. u.... mf QW&styex,furm.spwice.s Qssi;*YW Four -{;;;ui rS/ S 7 g M h otA D *4) N; rq ~"U^ y'c 4{1 8 %.~.i::: TM_N_ _.. *_ _ r. 3-@.M.. _ _@.0'_O _..N [ 4(t 7 2 sfts.x _.srsr?Wr M e4 OPtT4 __r,...~ y.- q .,4 report to he banager*tT70WT Virgi C. Summer Nuclear. Station thn:Me ~ r- - --E Ment M

rr

;d provide the group management for 'all plant a

} opera tions. Line management is provided by additional.pupervision vadern these group supervisors. .. ] s Adminis tra tive, technical, operations, maintenance, health physics, and chemistry personnel make up the plant operating staff. -T... J.... :- S _ ::.L- - ! 2;; _ l--::: y i.. -- L E_. p mr: _- -_ 7

= =::

Appropriate numbers of personnel may be added or deleted as necessary to balance the work load. The plant operating staff is organized as indi-cated on Figure 13.1-5. ,13.1.2.2 Personnel Functions, Responsibilities, and Authorities Virgil C. Sumer Nuclear Station personnel have a combination of educa-tion experience and skill comensurate with their level of responsibil-ity. These qualities pr' ovide assurance that decisions and actions dur-ing normal and abnormal conditions vill be such that the plant is operated in a safe and efficient manner in the interest of the health and safety of the public. The overall operating res Me-.g.r, sept c sonnser.._ponsibility for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear -L Me.ke S te *e. ~d Station rests with thegF4ent u'-' s The Manager Virgil C. Summer 15 Nuclear tation is responsible for plant operations in a safe, reliable, and efficient' manner by ensuring co pliance with all requirements of the operating license. The Manager Virgil C. Sumer Nuclear Station has 15 overall responsibility for the startup and test program, as described in Cha pter 14. 2.T AMENDMENT @ 13.1-16 h u a 'y j i T 8 2-C Z ~ - i-. - 'S}

4 DerP ~ Th2 a;J:g:- " "'.' hanegar cscicts ths Mcnag2r Virgil C. Summst 16 c Nuclear Station with the overall responsibility for plant operation and assumes full responsibility in his absence. Some,of his duties Mh rWT A1AHe Organizing and conducting meetings amongplantf r u;;..t!Hntas ..,;; for include: i formation and revi pur,pos e dorking with the supervisors and the leer wtwC.

P Su-'~- Gsx,pepov A.. Owvm... a to ensure that planned training and; 15 o

~ retraining programs will meet'the requirements of SCE&G and 'the NRC; A*nisT M 1* M ^^*y " "'. -} working with thegoperations y - to ensure that,the plant Ts operated within the limits of the operating license; working with the 4 4.vo#1" SeceWse:S N3eepe$ Maintenance ?-p r"tr^r to ensure that proper preventive. and corrective maintenance on equipment ts being performed; working with the4 egnicalr-MA"*W Ada T g Support _p:; *.::: to ensure that the KSSS and balance of plant systems are being utilized and operated in the safest and most efficient mode, the required chemical ana,1ysis, water quality control; working with the Q*\\ Wl'ft"9N7" M;n#41 c'. o i. ' -9 M k 5' M ' 1 -.;.. m r-...;er to ensure that t-mi.g, y '*t;

.c.c; 4 clerical,and plant records are being implemented in an ef ficient manner;

- ' arc.. .; a a u li c J i ~.. r. d. C pc..l___ - - - - - - - " "-Radiation Surveys, and general health ysics aspects of the plant are being '7 3 etn Mclut aslt+ control performed. Quality assurancegrequir ment in the operations phase are conducted as described in Section 17.2. 1. Operations Grou'p l /rsMrrM-MpMey e4jWW@S =, _ - O :r";;: r, mpert to the 1: n - 7 h tw--ger, The O H:;rs F is responsible for the day to day operation of the plant in a safe and ~ efficient manner in compliance with the operating license. He is res-ponsible for review and implementation of normal and emergency training A the assistance of a.. +A ~% and retraining programs. He has

t

.-t Opera-l tions Supervisor. 19 AwsrenMAmty%--- E: peta'M O The Shift Supervisor, who reports to the C..:rier i "7

via the A:: U:m.c Operations Supervisor is in direct charge of the plant, inclu-ding startup, power operations, and shutdown.

He will initiate imme-diate action in the event of an upset situation to avoid exceeding the \\ Technical Specifications limitations, to avert possible injury'or undue radiation exposure of personnel,'srm.rr rAnm.@ opagar,or.nt or to prevent damace to pla equip-Assi r.s ment. In the absence of the 0,~._:.-

"- : :..;, the see+e.s a.a.t 1

Operations Supervisor will assume his responsibilities. The Shift l ,gg % en M & '2.9 [

l 2. Tcch'nical Support Group , 21 AnWMQ 3>epV Y 1 ThqTcchnical Support -Eur- ' er., who rcports to the _^ q1 ::Ty_ +terc ' 27 Manager, is responsible for directing the activities' of the techni- .s group is composed of.WW. of: sire. OS/eJeeceD cal support group. Th:. Ftst:= L.cs I;u:=, .D*P-w R:..F Chemistry Sp r I::, 'u h.-.. /E a. L si , L c d E r;;

t r, */b Iq 2:

r .2Mac754 *F Technical Services {r**-*^r, 'and personnel under their direction. $e l b ?. $ k h 5 eI N, lt i s $1r W kk' b'e*h"b&*.kheb w a/ P a k ,s, Aavisors reportang tohMe as required by NUREG 0578, Section 2.2.1.b and 18 7 NUREG 0660, Rev. 2, Section I.A.1. '.7 f-AssimerMes=< Ep evaluates reports.on core reactivity, j TheyechnicalSupport reactivity coefficients, boron concentration, control rod positions, and 24 reactivity worths. He is responsible for initiating required technical, reports, and e.aluating daily the performance of the plant systems and resolving, by accepted engineering practices and approved procedures, any design modifications and/or engineering projects within the scope of the operating license. 1 &ll*GGl'OQW t The Station Nuclear Engineer works as directed by thek cd d r1 Op; ~* e'- Some of his responsibilities include; developing d g and writing startup procedures, operating procedures, and refuel-ing procedures; originating procedures involving tests on the ~ reactor; periodically determining fuel composition and burnup; determining proper fuel loading sequences; obtaining performance data on overall plant and equipment operation; and evaluating and determining control rod worths and operation sequences. 1 .DtpscTDg opstTC &N**N 1] Plant ' Engineers, who are supervised by the '_ cad %;'ac;-, work in various' phases of power plant operations. Some of these duties include developing and assisting in writing operating, naintenance, and testing procedures; participating in preoperational and startup testing; obtaining data for overall plant evaluation; and writing technical reports; disposition and coordination of nodifications; and technical aspects of procurement. Interface with offsite nuclear engineering for design changes is described in 13.1.1.4 AMENDMENT & 7.,.,7#11Ct,w w ;, 1OC: hM

fts:sig?tt lr* MBA *AL 31FECT'oKef U Th2fphsmi s t ry Se p :... _ --, who re por t s to the/ Technical Suppsrc Ep-- 1rc, hos the responsibility of supervising th2 Assistent.Ch;m-19 istr Supervisors and the Chemistry Specialists. Throug'h this s ta f f,' a s p. o f' theA emistry Sp:: '... is charged with interpreting chemical and radiochemical data, maintaining the quality of fluid in various plant 2.3 "Y*tems within the prescribed limits, ensuring that. vritten procedures em within his scope of supervision reflect the criteria or performance standards established by regulatory agencies, and ensuring that these procedures are followed. He is responsible for ensuring that training i l and retrainins; of Chemistry personnel is per f ormed as scheduled by the 19 Nucle %[p l.oM &;; Tru'sMQ-Grs4 f ar "in -F- \\ 19 The Chemistry Specialists, under the direction of the Assistant Chem-istry Supervisors, perform tasks incident to the categories of work . DI R. n F supervised by theg emistry W D

gP N

13 1-20 A.eno.nwr e "'7s MN -M.% 5.,.m %sp j

In2 -__..__fcomputer -..o_. __ wo r r.s s m euwcw wy... m m.... - 1 y ScAv ic.e5" H2 suparvi.scs tha vark of tha ::_.7_:: "rgg :: i 79 2e pp^~ Computer Sp3ciclists. Som2 of his responsibilicios " dye =M

b include obtaining performance data on t>verall plant and equipmen't operation, especially balance of plant and being familiar with com-puter hardware and sof tware and,vich Fortran IV language.

The role of the Shift Technical Advisor is to serve in an advisory ~ capacity to the Shift Supervisor in order to provide professionally on shift.. Dedicated to plant safety, qualified technical support the. Shif t Technical Advisor is to support thed[a'gnosisofoff-nor-mal events and to advise the Shift Supervisor _on actions.to termi-10 nate or mitigate the consequences o f s uch even ts. The Shift Tech-nical Advisor vill respond to the Shif t Supervisor in the Control Room within ten (10) minutes of an of f-normal reactor plant con di-tion. Routine duties and assignments of the Shif t Technical Advisor include matters involving engineering evaluation of day-to-day plant operations from a safety point of view. Further clarification of the. 23 shift technical advisor program including the long term'STA program has been submitted to the NRC under separate letter dated January 2, 1981 DIRau::Tt4t. of The Technical Services Coordinator works asdirectedbythe$ech- , 7.') s ne ros sces " ' '. The primary role of the Technical Services 21 A n-nical 5,ppert Coordinator is to provide a focal point within the station organiza-i tion for Regulatory matters. S:~P oces 3. Maintenance / Croup 1 thym r tWWN.tk h M ?iabe-ThetMaintenence N Ivbc ::p traan the a_ g ea, i s responsible for all maintenance activities at the plant. He I is res ponsible for developing and implementing a thorough preventive and corrective maintenance program. The Ins trument Supervisor is responsible for developing and imple-menting instrumentation procedures, maintaining calibrated test instruments for standardization checks or other test instruments, and maintaining adequate and accurate inst umentation status on W MMRf eA \\. plant systems. The responsibilities of the Maintenance -,r. 1 - r $2"A?r/ccJ assigned to the Mechanical Maintenance, Electrical or Instrument l 12I are Supervisor in his absence. AMENDMENT ~

i-l' 250 W:chcnical Maintencnce Suparvisor is responsible for the direct supervisicn of the machcnical =sintenance personnal for ths day to ^ dcy anc long rcnge (including off line) plcnt =aintenance activi- ~ ties. His duties include preparation of mechanical maintenance procedures, preventive maintenance planning and scheduling and cor-ra.ctive =aintenance job planning. The mechanical personnel work under the supervision of the Mechani- ~ 12 cal Maintenance Supervisor to perform the preventative and corree-tive maintenance program. The Electrical Supe'rvisor and the Instrument Supervisor have job descriptions similar to that for the Mechanical Maintenance Supervisor but applied to their area of specialization. The elec trical personnel and instrument personnel have job descrip-tions similar to those for the mechanical personnel but applied to their area of specialization. }W MS 12l The Mechanical Maintenance Engineer vill assist theAMain t enanceSeRVics.F k;c-:Ic;: vith scheduling, planning, training, and spare parts activities,of the maintenance group. A.ssaren-MMe.9ex-12 The Materials Supervisor, whoreportstothefMaintenance E _; - ~ ' e n sc Atrecc.5 j keeps a daily inventory of replacement and consumable spare parts. .5 o pergW The U tili ty A. =yost_1s responsible for the misc,ellaneous items for 1 general plant upkeep. The Utility Men work under the direction of 51P* fWl58R. the Utiltty a r = and carry out their duties when assigned. / 50pegvss on., Ass /S7' sed?" MAWW SEAYtc65 The Welding En;;urer-eno reports to theAHaintenance -Eper-I: rAis responsible.for establishing and maintaining a veld program in accordance with applicable State and Federal codes and regulations. I A wsrA^r W 99' ' s i s to thefMaintenance Oper-' ~/ n tee The Maintenance Planner who reports is responsible for planning and scheduling of =aintenance repair, test-T ing and inspection activities. D 13.;-22 A.'"2 MENT :ts: L% 19tt ...M

[.,"4,., ' f _.99'n:.r-Sgt.Victs Su p, 1-1:::im-Group su ~ .Do W Thef! y, who reports directly to the )h,y y f _ _ : =:n, n RF. c. e vi, - R *r w x r-S; e e M e s f s ._r: rn ;;r, is responsible for the supervision of administrative i 15 u functions of the plant. ...n n..-.. m, c.._., -._y. ~.mm f) - > - u nn .m q.n,7 7 g - pa; = _ 24. .,.,....L.... >.c.- 1 {. . ~,.~ / :, s :,_., to the f.d..inin:::*. ", &, Q.3 * .p;gg 4 )t.op /} m, ~' .~j; The Office Supervisor, who' reports 4 is responsible for clerical and personnel functions'at the plant. 15 p The Word Processing Senior Clerk, who reports to the Office Super-k visor, is in direct charge of a group responsible for providing word processing services for the plant staff. 12 The Document Senior ' Clerk, vbo reports to the Office Supervisor, is f, pgf in charge of a group of document clerks who are responsible for C document control. p o@k 1$. Auwmpf N.nnW The -Sr.te Emergency Coordinator, who reports to the *' sa@st.T* Set Vict:s kg..im, -is responsible for the effective planning, coordination and 24' management of the station emergency preparedness program. rys supue/LLApcc ~r6ST <:*eaF.95HATbg. j wHo P&Pogrs To THE 4ssistowrMoneym-> S"PPokana ' " "# I# Ae"? Ns'" t'e' f=WC' CFPcc.T1Vc. plANNItJy f crooRDINATiotJ T>c Of= 1~ld "WIOA Sullvet LLANcc. s %iItB P%f'Ats- "Til2.DI EcTOP:. OF bhEDOL.i lotsymgggp P e g4G*M r-rue easmn my, sq.grservicesfis w a n ete foK. Tt!E 6FFec.7, Ve. ptmpg am,yg.,,,y g.; ~ n,._ _ W W41i%2iG o e glV/7?cs,

t-

.,,s +,, p3e.U bra Ay <- '3,I-N zy l 13.1-22a AMENDMENT # ~Ta ** wy, It S t- ,1 f.

~ 1 INSERT A - PAGE 13.1-22a The Assistant Manager, Support Services r ;rr r x @ ='" _, x 7R-- aos is responsible for directing the activities of the Support Services Group. This group is composed of the Director of Administration,-the Emergency Coordinator, Surveillance Test Coordinator, the Director of f Scheduling and Outage Management, and the Director of Health Physics. j e 9 e

V f Th2 Personnel Senior Clcrk, who reports to tho Off I [. 4 rasponsible for p2rsonn21 offairs cc Virgil C. Sue:::[2r.Nuclocr \\ g S t a ti on. This position hns th2 services af on2 personn51, clerk. y Q e l : t,7 maaoc 1 M ,; 4 <,, M g

_.,et___

r - _ - ; : _ :..,.,..q 79;;; 20 3,, _J... u. .--r -d_,,. c c n,,, ,, c ~ __2 ..m.. u w -- e r__ .w., i s o yvu e 1 *. m 7,,___ m..._ .uv uc I l SK Nuclear Training 6too r NWC The@p f04 nog 2r-ht-ott CLn17[h4Mg *We . mc T; :r.ir.; C:::di-- -, rh; __p:rt: =

rtrn_..i s..

j I a staff'that is ~- .4 h m, o iuant r i.iu. . :m%_.,. S " ' r ;p C l responsible for training activities for plant per s onne l., Training and retraining ac'tivities for plant personnel are handled through coordination with the trainees' supervisor. ww.,

bIMccToR. oF The/HealthPhysicsSupervisce,,whoreports

-f..*- - Q to the '24 r4 geR S*PPo4T'StTWicCS y ~ g", has the responsibility of supervising the { Assistant .-_r: activities of the Assistant Health Physics Supervisors and the ecT4LcF Health Physics Specialists. Throupi this Staf f, the Health Physics 4 Ci r-E: r is charged with controlling the exposure of plant personnel to radiation, preventing the spread of radioactive et contamination, ensuring that written procedures 1:.. i r. '. i, f fp p c_pe. _ reflect the criteria or established perf ormance A \\,' standards, and ensuring that these procedures are followed. He is ' 2.g C responsible for ensuring that training and retraining of health physics personnel is performed as well as providing health physics training and periodic health physics reviews for all plant personnel. He is responsible for the timely submission of reports pertaining to health physics, radioactive waste releases to the environment, and l 1 other areas as required. Health Physics Specialists perform tasks incident to the categories ofworksupervisedbytheHealthPhysicsForemenunderthedirectio)n ( DIRECTOR of y '\\ of theAHealth Phystes.Smpcr isor. '2.9 \\ l3.1-23 AMENDMENT Ott-u.,, e 2. en, = rA la.,

15 13.1.3.1.1 Manager virgil C. Su==er Nuclear Station n 1. A : oral of ten years of power plant evperience, of whfeb a M ni=ue of three years is nuclear power plant experience. A caximu= of four years of the remaining seven years may be fulfilled by aca-m ~ ~ demic training on a one for one time basia. 2. Experience and training normally required f or examination by the .1 I NRC fbr a Senior Reactor Operator's License whether or not the 15 .o evamination is takan. 3. Baccalaureate or higher degree.in enginearing or a scientific field associated with power production is desirable. If the c$ ?l::t Manager meets the above experience requirements, the -l experience requirements for the Manager Virgil C. Su=:aer Nuclear Station may 15 be reduced such that only one of his ten years of experience need be nuclear power plant experience and he need not be eligible for the NRC Senior Reactor Operator's License evamination..However, it is desirable that both the Manager \\ TCPoq 15 Virgil C. Su=ner Nuclear Station and f. :1ct..; Pla Manager be eligible for the NRC Senior Reactor Operator's License exa=1 nation.

'7 9 '?l::t Manager 13.1.3.1.2

.t r r n r i 1. A total of ten years of power plant experience, of which a minimum of three years is nuclear power plant exper: fence. A maximum of four years of the remaining seven years may be fulfilled by aca-de=ic training on a one for one time basis. 2. Experience and training normally required for examination by the iGC for a Senior Reactor Operator's License whether or not the e_xamination is taken. 19 13.1-24 AMENDMENT X

l L

% ~y ~ 7 - s

l ) 3. Baccalaureate or higher' degree in engineering or o scientific field associated with power production is desirable. pe experience and academic requirements for the f.::irt:W.1snt Manager are M 1 r the same as for the Manager Virgil C. Su=mer Nuciear Stition. Even, if the ~ Manager Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station fulfills all the above requirements, 15; it is also desirable that the experience' and academic ~ training of the Aeeseeent- "D*fuTy P1_...;-Manager qualify him for the position of Manager,. Virgil C. Summer Nuclear 15 ~ Station. ks3tsYtwr* MAssyh; r 13.1.3.1.3 4 operations S p: ~'-^r { 1. A total of eight years of responsible power plant experience, of which a minimum of-three years mus t be nuclear power plant experi ' ? Although not rsquired, it is desirable that at least six ence. months of this experience be as an operator in a conventional or. I nuclear power plant. A maximum of two years of the power plant experience may be fulfilled by satisfactory completion of academic or related technical training on a one for one time basis. 2. Senior Reactor Operator's License. 3. High school educatio'n or equivalent. A degree in ens;ineering, preferably mechanical engineering, is desirable. 13.1.3.1.4 shift Supervisors 1. A total of four years of responsible power plant experiencc. of which a minimum of two years of this experience must be nuclear power plant experience. A maximum of two years of the remaining three years of power plant experience may be fulfilled by academic or related technica) training on a one for one time basis. 13.1-25 . ; =, 7/ k [-. Af

1 3. High school education or equivalent. ~ Assi.wsarMspe% Tanc wicst same.r-21 13.1.3.1.9 ~~ ^- f - -I !" pre

ruir..;;;

13 a 1. A' total of eight years in responsible positions, of which three' years must be nuclear power plant experience. A maximum'of four years 'of the rsmaining fpe years of experience should be fulfilled by satisf actory completion of academic training. .1 2. Senior Reactor Operator's License is desirable. 3. A baccalaureate or higher degree in engineering is desirable. 13.1.3.1. 10 Station Nuclear Engineer 19 1. A total of five years experience or a graduate degree and four years experience, of which three years shall be nuclear pow'er plant experience. 2. Senior Reactor Operator's License is desirable. 3. A baccalaureate or higher degree in engineering. 13.1.3.1. 11 Plant Engineer 12 1. A baccalaureate degree in engineering or the physical sciences. A.01STAWfl4MASetc f Maintenance c q ;...x; Sergdce.r Zi 12 13.1.3.1.12 1. A total of seven years of responsible power plant experience or applicable industrial experience, of which one year must be nuclear power plant experience.- A maximum of two years of the remaining ~2.7 13.1-27 AMENDMENT' W ^ ^ * * *7s / f F 2. C '. 0 00 _ p!$ '1? {

13.1.3.1.17 Incerum:nt Suparvicor ~. 12 1. Five years of experience in instrumentation and contro'1, of which one year is in nuclear instrumentation and control at a l3 nuclear power plant. A minimum of two years of this five years experience shall be" related technical training. A maximum of four years of this five years experience may be fulfilled by related technical or academic, training. .3 12 13.'1.3.1.18 Instrument Journeyman 1. Three years of instrument maintenance experience or applicable industrial experience. 13.1.3.1.19 Maintenance Engineer 12 i 1. One year of power plant experience. 2. A baccalaureate degree in mechanical or electrical engineering is desirable. "DiptecTt>at, oF 13.1.3.1.20 A Chemistry Cup rcir r-1. Five years of chemistry experience of which a minimum of one year shall be in radiochemistry at a nuclear power plant. A 3 minimum of two ye'ars of this five years experience shall be related technical training. A maximum of four years of this five years experience may be fulfilled by related technical or academic training. 2.- High school education or equivalent. A degree in-chemistry or che=ieni engineering is desirable. 9 6 I 13.1-29 AMENDMENT.3r 7,t9r2 - '" " C'.;, 13 5 mel v_ m =

r@ % w R 13.1.3.1.21 A Health Physics ic..: a 21 ~ D N Tt# *F TheAHealth Physics Supee"'=ar shall have a bachelor's degree or the equivalent in a science ~or engineering subject, including some formal craining in ' radiation protection. One year of experience in applied radiation protection work shall be deemed the equivalent to one year of academic training. He shall have' at least five years of professional experience in applied radiation protection. (A master's degree may be' considered equivalent to one year of professional experience, and a doctor's degree may be considered equivalent to two years of profes-sional experience where course work related to radiation protection is involve d.) At least three years of this professional experience shall be in applied radiation protection work in a nuclear facility dealing with radiological problems similar to those encountered in nuclear power stations, preferably.in an actual nuclear power station. Arsidant Sv f 'd-. %Ftrc; SeroeT.Seedces t 13.1.3.1.22 .nu tr x --- y Ass %nt tr} anger sopporY Se.u41ces i Thefilminir trrtiv^ '"pervirer should have six years of administrative experience, preferably in a technical field.. Four years of.this exper-E ience may be fulfilled by a bachelor's degree. F.xperience in document control, filing and retrieval in a nuclear industry in desirable. 1 P2.1. D1.22- ^_n;ptc!10E CC:rdI Cv. 2 = ep'i"rlen of fl c yeu. uf nc.mo g i m Cvv. 'incter += 11 nnee-rc 7: :. 7,__ v f ;.h u m = w elaar ~~ e r plant. . a.t preferr-W-s ~q =p u ica c

y be fulfilled by :. be A lc.'T 3: m qp eq i::ler: :

gineering r @ [eN. Quality centrol enper D ia % Q er) 2 xim vs c p prd :e winem,7 ~ "LS 13.1.3. I e, Dl PAC.TD% 0E 5% QtHetAl a::: =;;n r PERCCtA of Sira GM'seaAcIA!4 The kcd Engi r ^- requYres a t*tical of six years in responsible posi-2

ions, of which two years must be nuclear power experience.

A maximum of four of the remaining four years of experience may be fulfilled by 7? 13.1-30 Av.2NDMENT.23" Le s vy, I 4 8 2. -. -...-,..; - -e .,j +--

m uu s ucucy cvapAe'aou ci oc-ce=l e ::ra ini ng. A dosaw Res tw opera-tor's Licence ic dasirable. A b eccolau reate or higher degree 'in engi-neering is d2cirable. 12 ~ -2.1.3.1.25 Nuu. ear.raisier 'i nerer e N " m ' - a r * :n.... "eesdi m ;w.

m;.1 m f f a r: :r: -M

.squ. m. / _ _ _p-7......me...... .- ? _ t .c 7..._ m. .m.__ 'L4 +m e_ _ m.- p _- _.....__,;.__,- __r... .rm.r-, .m ...m t.. ___u_ _-.-_-_.a. -- si t _ _ t.. _ _1 .m. m. m ...m mom. ..m.~ -F ) >._. :. t.. _ _=. .,;,,,,,. w-n_,. ._x__,..,.- _-.qu .mm .s._...._ E g.., e i re bi-e. j 4 Z i 13.1.3.1 Shif t Technical Advisor [. The Shif t Technical Advisor requires a Bachelor degree in engineering or related sciences or high school diplcea and sixty (60) semester hours of college level education, (900 classroom or instruc tor conducted hours) in mathematics, reac tor physics, chemis try, mate rials, thermodynamics,' 18 fluid mechanics, heat transfer, elec trical and reac tor con trol theory. One year of prof essional level nuclear po'wer plant experience is requi red. 75 13.1.3.1 M L a..; Operations Supervisor 1. A total of four years of responsible power plant experience, of which a minimum of two. years of this experience must be nuclear power plant experience. A maximum of two years of the remaining three years of power plant experience may be fulfilled by academic 19 or related technical training on a one for one ti=e basis. 2. Senior Reactor Operator's License. 3. High school education or equivalent. 13.1-30a amtw n ~ 7,, m WWE K^ lu: L,c"y

7[P ll 13.1.3.1 4 Centrol Room Forem:n ) 1. A total of two years of power plant experience of which'a minimum of one year shall.be nuclear power ' plant experience. Six months of the remaining year of experience may be credited by related technical training or relevant experience. 2.-- Senior Reactor Operator's License. .3

3. ;High school education or equivalent.

Cr m r T) s.r.s.i.z.7 13.1.3.2 Oualification of Plant Personnel The staffing of personnel f or the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Stat; ion is c.2rrently being accomplished. Persons presently e= ployed are undergoing D training.. W 1 is the intent of the Applicant that the overall organi-l zation vill comply with ANSI N18.1 - 1971 on or before initial fuel loading. ~ l l i AMENDMENT h.- 13.1-30b T**?) IT S 2 -,,Ts., j L-j , rg 1

~ USGT A - pscg 33.3_30b 13.1.3.1.27 Director of Technical Services The Director of Technical Services requires a total of six years in responsible positions, of which two years must be nuclear power experience. A maximum of four of the remaining four years of experience may be ful-filled by satisfactory completion of academic training. A Senior Reactor Operator's License is desirable. A baccalaureate or higher degree in engineering is desirable. e %e D O 9 6 8 e I i l

AMENDMENT 19 { b* JUNE 1980 E'}:>l J4CEE. D y E3 TABLE 13.1-1 (Continued)

13. I~.ir5~ AvD NN RESUMES g 3, ( _,, 3 g g f TH Nuclear Staff Assistant

[O)CS Appoin tee : Abram B. Harrison Formal Education. 1943 Dentsville High School,. Richland Coun South Carolina. .7 60-1961 U.S. Navy Nuclear Power School, V

ejo, California.

i 196 1961 U.S. Navy Nuclear Power Proto,ype Training ( A-1-W), Idaho Fa1 , Idaho 1966-19 6 U.S. Navy Nuclear Power P o/

m totype ( A-1-10 1

Engineering Of ficer of 'e Watch (EDOW) Training. Qualified N vember 1966. Wes tinghous\\ y e Training: Westin buse Nuclear Training Training: s ? Center, Zion,\\ Illinois / 1. Phas I Fundame tal Nuclear Technology (comy ted J 'ry 1975). \\ r(ting PWR Observation 2. Phase I O (cou:plet , April 1975). 3. Phase I 'Mator Training , 'e d (conp t e 1975). 1978 On-ite funda ntal lectures, systems e ekouts, heal h physics lectures, SRO review, stinghouse audit. Experience: 1945-194,. U.S. Navy 1947-55 Southern Railway Co. any, and self en:p loye d.

Fireman, eam and diesel engines.

Plumbing, va er put:p repairs. 55-1960 U.S. Navy, Boiler Tende Operation and maintenance of Navy o 1 fired boilers and s team plan ts. 1960-1974 U.S. Navy Nuclear Power Prog an: 1961-1963 In training and nec. anical operator instructor W prototype, Idaho Fall, Idah'o. 1964-1965 USS Enterprise, mechani 1 j ~ / operator and advanced to ief P4ac tor Auxiliary Operator Co= plat.ed re f uelin g ove tha

@4 ",/ nana m a ,/ MARCH, 1 1 ABLE 13.1-1 (Continued) PZSIDES c / 19 -19 68 A-1-V prototype, Idaho Fall, Idaho. Operator, instruct Qualified mechanical oper or, chief reacto'r auxiliary

erator, chief machinery operator Engineer-ing Officer of the Wate. During this period, completed functor plant modification and inst ation of A-1-W-A core 3 as 11 as y

\\ operation and train,' on A-1-W-B. s / 1969-1971\\ I!SS Enterprise. ified Pro-ulsion Plant Wat ' Of fice r TPFWD). Duties jstation chief r refueling, erbaul and instal-l' tion of A-2-W 're 3. \\ j. 1971-1974 A-yU prototye / Idaho Talls., Id ' Qualif ed as Engineering i Off ' er of th ' Watch. Duties as ~~ Lea g Crew ief. During this perio., comp eted reactor plant overh 61 an installatica of USS N tz-core in A-1-W-B. Parti y efueled A-1-V-A core 3 operati and training on A-1-W-A and B re tors. 1974 South Carolina Ele t e and Gas Company. Operations Supe ser for Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station. Tra 'ing at Westinghouse Nuclear Training Cente \\ Zion, Illinois. Da-site setup o plant ,ganiza tion. Writing port of and view of Virgil C. Sumer Nucl ar Station Final Safety Analysis Rep t. Establis ing format and writing ministrative d operating procedures. Reviewing and roving operations, chemistry, healt physics, eme rgency an, surveillance est and fuel han g procedures. Re eving systen de ign descriptions, terviewed and part cipated in selection o ope ratin g Participated in rec pt of personn new fu, start-up testing and p -ope rational test Accumulative work Nuc1 ar power p'lant \\14 years experience before (U./ Navy) g fuel loading: / \\ Nu ear power plant \\7 years, ( &G) monthe 24 ossil power plant ears Total' Creditable Power Plant 26

ars, Expe rience 3m hs 24 13.1-36 w-

RESUME p,,,7 2,7 Director of Chemistry I'""*'// #i" Appointee: Walter F.. Bacon 5ormal Education: 1971 B.S., Chemistry, Woffor'd College, Spartanburgh, S.C. ~ Training: 3 months, U.S. Navy Machinist Mate "A" SchAol, Grest Lakes, Illinois (completed July,1972) ~ 6 months, U.S. Navy Nuclear Power School, Bainbridge, Maryland (completed Feb., 1973) ~ 6 months, U.S. Navy Nuclear Power Prototype, S-l-C,~ Windsor Locks, Connecticut (completed Sept., 1973) 3 months, U.S. Navy Engineer Laboratory Technician ) t School, S-1-C, Windsor Locks, Connecticut (completed Dec., 1973) I week, Health Physics Training Couirse, Indian Point

2 Nuclear Station, Peekskill, N.Y. (completed Feb., 1978) 6 weeks, Health Physics Training Course, Alabama Power Company, Farley Nuclear Plant, Dothan, Ala. (completed Sept., 1978) 23 5 weeks, Applied Health Physics, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge, In. (completed June, 1981)

Experience: 1973 Qualified Mechanical Operator and Engineering Laboratory Technician, S-1-C, Windsor Locks, Ct. 1973-1976 Assigned as Staff Operator / Instructor S-1-C Prototype, Windsor Locks, Ct., 24 months Responsible for Health Physics and Chemistry Control for the Reactor and Steam Plant; Maintenance and Operation of all Mechanical Sys tems ; training of Officers and Enlisted Personnel in Health Physics, Chemistry, and Mechanical Systems. 1976-1977 Assigned as Mechanical Operator / Engineering Laboratory Technician, USS Woodrow Wilson '~3BN-624), 24 months l Mechanical op'erator, responsible for operation and maintenance of Reactor and Steam Plant: Engineerine Laboratory Technician, responsible for Chemistry and Health Physics control of Reactor and Steam Plant, i h

p RESLME fn a~Jen 29 ' Director of Chemistry L,.,, 1f71 l Experience (cont'd.): 1978 Senior Health Physics Technician, Numanco, Inc., 6 months. Provided Contractor Health Physics coverage for major refueling /mainten- ~ ance outage at Con Edison's Indian Point #2 Nuclear Station and Boston Edison's Pilgram Nuclear Station. 7/ 4-1978-1981 Senior Health Physics Technician, Alabama 4 Power Company. Farley Nuclear Plant, 6 months. 5 Responsible for Health Physics coverage, scheduling and procedure development. Assigned Temporary Health Physics Foreman, 7 months. Responsible for supervision of in-house and contractor Health Physics Technicians during 7 month refueling /mainten-y ance outage. Assigned as Health Physics Instructor, 24 mor,ths. Responsible for developing and pre-senting Health Physics Technician Training course, Radiation Worker Training, Respiratory Protection Training, and Reactor Operator Health Physics Training. 1981 Assigned as Assistan't Health Physics Supervisor, V.C. Su=mer Nuclear Station, 4 months. Re-sponsible for supervision of Surveillance and Control Section of Health Physics Group. C 1981 to Assigned as Director of Chemistry, ?.C. Summer Present Nuclear Station. Responsible for planning, scheduling, and supervising all Chemistry Group activities. Accumulative Work . Naval Nuclear Experience 72 months Experience Before Fuel Loading: Commercial Nuclear Experience at Indian Point #2 and Pilgram 6 months Comercial Nuclear Experience at Farley Nuclear Plant 37 months Nuclear Power Plant Construction and Startup, V.C. Sumer Nuclear Station 7 months Total Credible Power Plant to years ~ Experience

7. month L

-__a_-____-__-_

[ C'$, 1)$ e u -1 TABLE 13.1-1 (Ccetinued) S M RESUMES 19 %~ry 1;;;;t._g fl=t Manager i 2d . Appointee : John G. Connelly, Jr. Formal education: 1966 B.S. Nuclear Engineering, North Carolina State University. Training: 1968-1969 Westinghouse Reactor Operator 'Trm1Mng ~ -? !\\ Program, Waltz Mill, and Pittsburgli, PA. 24 ~ .j 1969-1970 H.B. Robinson on-site training program, } i Bartsv111e, S.C. Experience : Employed by Carolina Power and light Company from 1966 to March 1977. ] 1966-1968 Start-up Engineer and Plant Engineer at 700 MWe Foss11' Unit. [ 1968-1972 Nuclear Engfaeer and Senior Engineer at H.B. Robinson Nuclear Plant. Performed Start up Operations. Wrote general Plant Administrative Procedures. Training Coor-dinator for all plant operators. Inspecte d' new fuel arriving on site. Obte.ined license (SOP-1367). Shift supervisor during 4 initial power ascension phase. W b 1972'1977 Principal Engineer - Nuclear Training and .b k Administration. Responsible for cost-i k analysis, procurement and construction of aD Shearon Harris Nuclear Plant Simulator; h' p1q preparation of Nuclear Generation Depart-5'g . ment's O&M budget (approximately $23 millien); coordination of all Nuclear Gen, hj Training Programs. Registered as a Professional 28 e Engineer. I N E= ployed by South Carolina Electric and Gas Company s3g; from March 1977 to present. 2 o< Q 4.it D EP 1977 -1979 Technical. Support Supervisor-1g T (See FSAR or Administrative Procedures p(h for responsibilities.) gN3 DEN Performing dual role as Start-up Super-g t visor. Ensures the development, effective Z h h flt ad=inistrative control, and i=plementation. gl.L g W of the Start-up Test Program. Supe rvise i 1 QC h and coordinate all activities of the 5 m [ k LQ O-g Start-up Group. QV 1979 Assistant Plant Manager - (See FSAR or Administrative Procedures p" for responsibilities.) L i E - - O P.erforming dual role as Start-up Supervisor. Ig__

/p n is r> N n ,3 Mi h f79ge tairH H S .n h.,- A-TTA C i4 E.D TfJSEM TAE.E 13.1.1 (Continued) ~ ',. /. FISUMES l i [ I & C Supervisor Appointee : ob Hinson j I Fornal education: 1 1 U.S. Air Force 24 week Basic Elect ics ~ / l 196 U.S. Air Force 16 week Advanced ectronics l l-1961-62 U.S. Air Force 16 week Crypto chool., i 1 1963 U.S. Air Force 16' veek Co=p er School f, t i 1963 University of Maryland ension asic courses, j 1964-1965 dversity of Florida .ension b a' c courses. 1966-1969 Mid1 ds Tech Elec. Eng. Technology \\ Training : 1971 Baileys ter 3 v eks Analog Co=puters 1971 Bailey er, weeks Digi 1a1 Con:puters / 1972 leeds and .thrup Basic Measures Circuits Controllers I 1973 General. lect. e 4.2 1"J Svitch Gear / 1974

Gener, Electric Alterex Systems Experience :

1961-1965 U.. Air Force Cry tographic 74paiz=an. ponsible for ins allation, check-out, . art-up and repair f cryptographic .D equipten t. t 1965-196 Dictaphone. Engineer 1 As sistant. Responsible for aiding design and building new products f6 audio visual equipment. 19 8-1969 Dupont Electrician. Pasp'on ible for installation ~ and checkout of electrical equiptent. 1969-1973 South Carolina Electric and Gas Co=pany. Instrunent Technican responsible for checkout and start-up of boiler e trol.and other plant instru:ents. Did tro le shootin;; and repair of plant equip nt af ter start-up. \\ 13.1-39

tty 36#t7 D P ~ ~ . t. rs.1 er RESUME ELECTRICAL SUPERVISOR Appointee: John J. Nesbitt Formal Education: 1967 Colonial Heights High School, Colonial Heights, Virginia 1968 3 months U.S. Navy Electricians Mate "A" School ] i 1968 6 months U.S. Navy Nuclear Power Basic School, 9' Bainbridge, Maryland e Training: 1969 6 months U.S. Navy Nuclear Power Prototype,.. I Saratoya Springs, N.Y. 1973-1978 Vepco Power Station Development Program, 1 Surry, Va. I Experience: 1969-1973 USS James Madison Operator / Electrician; vorked as an operator -1 and maintenance. Qualified as Electrical i Operator, AMR II Upper Level and Shutdown . i Maneuvering Watch. 1973-1978 Maintenance Electrician at Vepco.'s Surry Nuclear Power Plant 1978-1979 Maintenance Electrician, V.C. Summer Nuclear Station (See FSAR Section 13.1 for responsibilities.) 1979-1.981 Electrical Maintenance Foreman at V.C. Summer Nuclear Station (See FSAR Section 13.1 for responsibilities.) 1981 Electrical Maintenance Supervisor at V.C. Summer Nuclear Station (See FSAR Section 13.1 for responsibilities.) Accumulative Work Experience Before Fuel Loading: Operating Plants: Naval Nuclear Power 60 Months Surry Nuclear Station 60 Months Plant Startup: V.C. Summer Nuclear Station 42 Months Total credible power plant experience: 13 Years, 6 Months [MedeatokD n

r r'1!Ts;P, M m h; Deconbee ? ~ ~ TABLE 13.1-1 (Continuad) RESUMES 1 3-1977 Eouth Carolina Electric and Gas any. Instrument and Electrical Supervi or, s responsible to Assistant Plant perin-tendent for maintenance testin,, calibration and repair of all plant inst =ntation and p electrical on two 400 mega et fossil units. 1 uth Carolina Electric Gas Company. % h k g \\g 0 16 Supervisor, virgil . Summer Nuciaar b y Stat on 960 megawatt gle unit. b g/ / g Resp ible to Start Supervisor for \\. \\ hf \\ / writin and imple ting testing procedures \\ and main enance p cedures for start-up 'g of plant. Accumula te d wo rk (, Fossil power p experience 9 years experience before fuel loading : Westinghouse t ain in Nuclear 4 months Instrumenta t n, Nucl ar Padiation Monitoring aining er table as expe rienc Nuclea over plant start at 41 months 24 Virgi C. Su=mer Nuclear Sta on. Nu ear experience calibration d 8 months t. ting of Nuclear Control Inst entation; developing procedures maintenance, testing and calibration of Nuclear Instrumentation. Total Creditable Power Plant 13 ears. l 24 Expe rience : ~5 ths i i 13.1-40

e-JfeECH, 1981 % % Lt.- TABLE 13.1-1 (Conthued) g c RESUMES Ch:-#-try S;;;rticer f; I Appointee : Frederick J. Leach l Formal Education: '970 ~ B.S., Aeronautical Engineering, Univers ty of Minnesota-l l 197 Six months, U.S. Navy Nuclear Power chool, Mare Island, California l, 1980 M.B. A., University of South Carol na

24 Training:

Six mon s U.S. Navy nuclear power office s pro tory training, A-1-W Prototype, Idah

Falls, Idaho (co leted November 1971).

Six months, .S. Navy Submarine Schoot, Submarine -1 Officer's Adv ced Course, Groton, ecticut (completed Apr 1974). One mon th, U.S. vy Nuclear Wea .~s Safety Officer Course, Norfolk, rginia (comp eted March 1973). 1} Twelve weeks, Westin house water chemistry course, Pittsburgh, P nnsyl ania (completed November 1978). Registration: Registered Professional en ineer, State of South Carolina. \\, 24 ~ Experience: 1971 Qualifie as Engin ring Officer of the . Wat ch, 1-W protot e PWR (completed Novemb r 1971). 1971-1973 Ele rical Officer, 1 ar, and Assistant We pons Officer, 6 month, USS BATTISH ( N-681) l. As Electrical Officer, esponsible for operation and maintenanc of all ships electrical generation, di tribution, and power driven equipment and I interior communications equ ent. 2. As Assistant. Weapons Officer, responsible for ship's main bat ery weapons, and weapons handling an launching equipment. Functioned Command's Nuclear Weapons Saf ety Officer. S. t i i l

'f AMENDMEbT tC I.E 13.1-1 (continu2d ) 4RftCH 1981 Se. se RESUMES / Qualif d as O f ficer of th e,D ~ and j Engineert Officer of th ' arch, USSS l BATFISH (SS

81) (Wes. ' grous e S-5-W PWR 8

plant). / l s 1. Particip d in W PWIL s ~ pre-c ical, zer wer, and power r e test programs-d other onstruction activitie j 9 G 1 l l 13.1-41a

MARG, 1981 N3_W TABLE 13.1-1 (Continued) RESUMES 2. Supervised' S-5-W PWR opezations d codification and test programs 1974-1976\\ P4 actor controls Officer, 6 mon , and JO C H ' (S 63b. As P4 actor Controls Offic r, y,7 \\ responsible for operati and main ~

tenance of all reactor t monitor-

\\ing sys tems, power sup es, and i control equipment uch as the d control system. 2. As Main Propulsion es is tant, - re onsible for ration and main-h' ten ce of all r ctor plant mech ical-and uid system com-poneo and al secondary (pro-N pulsi n) plan syste=s and components. f d Qualified Off cer of the Deck and g Engineering Off cer of the Watch, g USS JOHN C. Holm (SSmi-630) (West- \\ inghouse S-5 PWR plant). 1. Supervis- 'S-5-W PWR operations and modific ti n and test programs. 1976-Assigned s 01c 'stry Supervisor, Virgil . Sum =er 'iuclear Station. Responslie for c. ecistry and radio chemis ry procedur development; setup and checkoul f plant laboratories; pro rement of all 1 boratory equip-me

chemistry cent of all~ systems d 'ing start-up and o ration; Opera-t 'on of Wa ter. Treatmen and Makeup

,ater Systems ; and deve, pment and . implementation of an NP S environmental monitoring program. In a dition, functioned as start-up eng'neer. Turned 2d over and started up both no -safety and safety systems. Accumulative work ' Nuclear power plant o pe ra tion, 67 months Experience before U.S Navey fuel loading: Nuclear power plant construction month s l 24 and system start up, Virgil C. Su=rner Nuclear Station. Total Creditable Power Plant 10

ears, l

Rapard onee 2:

g TqserT E RES p,g p ( -d, Assistant Manager Support Services l l Appointee: Vincent R. Albert Formal Education: 1956-1960 BS in Physics, Pur'due University, West Lafayette, Ind. ~ 1961-1978 ~ University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa. '40 credits Undergraduate Electrical Engineering. 30 credits Graduate Electrical Engineering (Control). Successfully completed MS comprehensive examination. Training: Bettis Reactor Engineering School - Various Design Oriented c Courses. LWBR Operator Training School, Shippingport Atomic Power Station S 24 week program, certified as Shift Test Supervisor. Exnerience: 1960-1963 Junior Physicist - Process Development and Applied Engineering at Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, Harmarv111e, Pa. i 1963-1978 Reactor Plant Design Engineer; Shipyard Resident Engineer / Resident Manager; Assistant Manager - Test / Operations, Shippingport Atomic Power Station - Light Water Breeder Reactor (LWBR) Project at Bettis Atomic Power Laboratory 2 (Naval Reactors Design Agent), West Mif flin, Pa. 3/63-5/67 Submarine Power Plant Engineering and Shielding: Initially employed as a Shield Design Engineer responsible for the desi n of submarine reactor plant shields and F spent fuel shipping containers. Performed radiological evaluations of reactor plant operational and reactor servicing problems. Represented the design agency (at various shipyards) during approximately 25 initial reactor startup test programs for shield performance acedptance. Qualified as a physics reactivity monitor for shipyard refueling operations. Participated in the Naval Crew Training program as an instructor lecturing on Radiation Physics, Shield Design, Health Physics, and Radiological Emergency Procedures. 5/67-5/72 Bettis Resident Manager's Office - Charleston Naval Shipyard, Charleston, S.C.:, Transferred to the Bettis Resident Manager's Office at Charleston Naval Shipyard. Formally cualified as a SSW Shift Test Engineer and as a S5W Shift Refueling Engineer. Parti-cipated in approximately 8 refueling / overhaul test programs as the Bettis Representative on the Joint Test Group (comprised of members from the Shipyard, Naval Reactor's Office, the Bettis Office, and the Ships l Force Engineering Officer). Participated in 4 reactor l refuelings as the Bettis representative on the Joint i O' %~y, tt st. (3, /- f O M:4, n?i

AfkWl~l C ~ R. Bd-40 ~ 2 O RESuxE Assistant Manager Support Services Experience (cont'd.): Refueling Group (membership similar tb JTG). Responsible to insure that testing and refueling operations were conducted safely in accor(ance with technical requirements. As the Design Agent's ~ representative provided technical advice to.the m shipyard, represented the Naval Reactor component procurement agencies as their onsite agenti and acted as onsite technical advisor for the local ' Naval Reactor's Representative relative to reactor c servicing problems. Participated in nuclear and radiological emergency drills as an objective advisor. Conducted audits, inspections and sur-veillance of all aspects of reactor servicing work. Participated in oral review boards for shipyard Shif t Test Engineer and Shif t Refueling Engineer qualification examinations. ] 2/72 Temporarily assigned to a special SSN 585, USS Skipjack Task Force at Newport News, Va. for evaluation and resolution of a unique shipboard reactor servicing problem. 5/72-4/75' Bettis Resident Manager's Office - Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, N.B. : p As Bettis Resident Manager, was responsible for the technical direction of decontamination, testing, and refueling of the submarine reactor plants serviced .at Portsmouth. Also, provided technical direction during new construction of a decontamination barge. As Resident Manager, represented the reactor plant co=ponent procurement agencies as their Senior onsite agent. Acted as the design agent's technical advisor to the local Naval Reactoy's Representative and pro-vided liason with Senior Shipyard personnel and the submarine Commanding Officers. Participated in nuclear and radiological emergency drills as the Design Agent's advisor to the Naval Reactor's Representa,tive in the Primary Emergency Control Center. Trained assigned Bettis Resident Engineers as S5W Shift Test Engineers and Shift Refueling Engineers. Participated on the Shipyard's Oral Review Board for qualification exami-nations of Shif t Test Engineers, Shif t Refueling Engineers, and Radiological Control Supervisory per-sonnel. Directed audits, inspections, and surveillance of all aspects of reactor servicing work. Participated in the NAVSHIPS Code 08 biennial management audit of shipyard work. Submitted a weekly report,on reactor servicing problems, shipyard management problems, and unusual occurrences to Admiral H.C. Rickover. I 1-7, i9 52. s _ ,m /3,/~4/ k -- -t

Jj%9erl E \\ T II*WsN ) RESWE G od T* J o Assistant Manager Support Services Experience (cont'd.): 4/75-10/77 Westinghouse Site Organization - Shippingport Atomic Power Station (SAPS): i l! As Assistant Manager of the onsite Test / Operations c Light Water Breeder Reactor (LWBR) organization,1 3. provided the overall test and operations direction for defueling of the PWR Core 2, LWBR core installa- ' !l tion, initial startup, and power range testing of - !1

the L%lR plant. Approved technical work sequences I

and scheduling to insure the compatibility of tests and' operations with plant conditions and plant ~ safety upgrade modifications (safety related improve-ments to current commercial industry standards). Functioned as Chairman of the Joint Test Group j-(comprised of members from the local Naval Reactor's Office, Duquesne Light Company SAPS Operation Dept., and the Bettis Representative). Provided technical advice to the Manager of Test / Operations and technical direction to the Shif t Test Supervisors assigned to Control Room duties. Formally qualified as a Shift Test Supervisor after training at the SAPS operator training school. Certified by the Pittsburgh Naval Reactor's Office (ERDA) as a Bettis Shif t Test 2 7 Engineer for the LWBR test program. Provided management overview during initial criticality and power range testing of the LWBR plant. 10/77-8/78 Bettis Radiation and Safety Project: Returned to the Bettis site as coordinator of the ' Beaver Valley Poder Station /Shippingport Atomic Power Station Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. Provided program evaluation and liason between the Duquesne Light Company and the design agent's techni-cal staff. Participated on a Task Force'that conducted a management audit of Bettis Radiological Control. technician and supervisor training. Participated as an emergency drill observer during quarterly drills. 8/78-11/80 Senior Management Consultant to the Nuclear Construction Department of the Duquesne Light Company in the areas of operations, test, and startup. Beaver Valley Power Station Unit #1 first refueling. outage and Unit #2 initial test a'nd'startup. Employed by Energy Consultants, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pa. Joined ECI as Senior Management Consultant for operations, testing, and plant startup of the Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station, Unit If 2. Duties included planning and scheduling of all test and startup activities from construction to commercial operations, hiring of personnel, formulation of the startup administrative program, and supervision of test and startup activities. Additionally involved in similar activities during the first refueling i

Q& ? k,(t h d TABLE 13.1-1 (Continued) y'O t ( %y RESUMES-Et d (b task force assigned to review the accident J. O [$3. -[AD at Three Mile Island in relation to Oconee ' Nuclear Station. Assisted with projects CJ k2 h involved with the A1. ARA program and a study fT N of airborne radioactivity sources in reactor Q y containment and its. impact on plant availa-h -{ < z bility and sr.ation' release limits. Member 4 {q-of station technical reviev' committee. g u h 1979-1980 Health Physics Supervisor. Worked in group ~' Q{U(R ~- responsible for radiological monitoring in support of operations and main'tenance activ-( ities at Duke Pouer Company, Oconee Nuclear g.Mg Station. Supervised' group of.four. Outage Ekh3 activitie's involved supervision of up to ten additional personnel. 3 1980-19Bl Health Physics Supervisor, South Carolina Electric and Gas Company, Virgil C. Summer -t W S em-Nuclear Station. Responsible for implement-ing all health physics activities. Includes training and retraining of health physics personnel and all other plant personnel. En-sures that all liquid and gaseous effluents are released within the state and federal reg-( ulations, and the reports pertaining to these releases and other health physics activities } are submitted to the appropriate agencies. ~ Accumulative work Nuclear Power Platic Experience - 5 years experience before y' 7 months fuel loading: 13.1 -44 AMENDMENT "S~wv&p19 8 2 ('.2'" 9 W (

., 6 re ~l I, s. r m

h, RESUME

\\ i GoveT. Assistant Manager Support Services 'l Experience (cont'd.): outage of Beaver Valley Nuclear Power Station, Unit #1. Modification activities during this outage included Three Mile Island Lessons learned safety upgradirig activities. Participated in a Duquesne i Light Company audit of their Unit #2 Architect - Engineer's onsite contract management group and ei acted as an advisor for an inhouse audit of Unit #1 station operations. 11/80-5/81 Reassigned to ECI headquarters and charged with the responsibility to organize and manage an engineering f group assigned to update the ' Beaver Valley Nuclear , Power Station Unit #1 FSAR (from 1976 to present). 5/81-11/81 Employed by South Carolina Electric and Gas Company, as Technical Assistant to the General Manager of Nuclear Operations. In this capacity, provided ~ advice and assistance in evaluating project status, activities, and schedular projections. Acted as a T liason and coordinator for revision of the Quality - - Assurance Plan. 11/81 to Assistant Manager Support Services at V.C. Su=mer Nuclear Station (see FSAR Section 13.1 for respon-Present sibilities). Accumulative Work . Total Credible Nuclear Power Experience Before Plant Experience' 18 years Fuel Loading: 10 months-l Asede27 13 I-47. T ovey,1982 n -w

iABLE 13.1-1 (CantanucG) RESUMES ~ EA *-

F Health Physics-C_; r *- i,

g Appointec: Leldon A. Blue, Jr. Formal Education: B.S., 1976 Oklahoma State University. Major: Radiation and Nuclear Engineering Technology. Special emphasis on radiation mansurements, radiochemistry, en' ironmental. '-> v [ monitoring, radiation biolor,y, regulations, radiological health, and nuclear engineering technology. ,e Training: Radiochemistry, Babcock and Wilcox, Lynchburg Research 4J Center, Lynchburg, Virginia. Two week course in sampling techniques, laboratory instrumentation, evaluation of .l ~ fuel cladding failures, reactor coolant chemistry, and ~ other related areas. Experience: 1976-1977 Junior Health Physicist. Worked in projects and training group, Duke Power Company. Oconce Nuclear Station. Initial training included six months rotation through station and Health Physics groups. Projects included involvement with station tzsk force responsi-l ble for'the review and upgrade of stationary effluent radiation monitors, preparation of procedure for correlation of effluent radia-tion monitors with laboratory analyses, and preparation of station reports involving un-usual radiological occurrences. 1977-1979 Assistant Health Physicist. Worked in projects and training group, Duke Powcr Company, Oconee Nuclear Station. Began leading group activities in June 1978. "rojects included organization of I program for controls and accountability of inter-nal exposure (MPC-hours) during outages, super, vision of newly formed group responsible for maintaining the respiratory program in compli-ance with NUREG 0041,'and preparation of station reports involving unusual radiological occurren-Member of station technical review committee. ces. 1979 Associate llealth Physicist. Led activities of projects and training group, Duke Power Company, Oconee NucIcar Station. Responsibilitics. included conducting formal training sessions for technicians, l observing the operation of stationary rodf ation monitors and maintaining, operational procedures, maintaining emergency procedures, conducting emergency drills, and conducting annual training' sessions for various agencies supporting the emergency plan. Involved four months with company [ 7.T 13.1-43 NMENT F '3** Ww y,I98 2 :::Q23 l Dn , 9-{ l

g ; r ,c.r ~b~t,v er"yj /782 r TABLE 13.1-1 (Continued) RESufES ich: z Operations Supetrvisor 19 Appointce : Kenneth W. Woodaard Formal education: 1955 Everett High School, Everett, Was hington. p g 4 1968 12 months, U.S. Art:y Nuclear Power Plan

2 Operatcr School, Ft. Belvoir,' Virginia

.1 W 1968 4 mcuths, U.S. Army Nuclear Power Plant In:strumentation Course, F;. Belvoir, Va. 1969 2 months, U.S. Army Nuclear Power Plant Superintendent Course, Ft. Belvoir, Va. Training : Operating PWR reactor controls for training, SM-1. Nuclear Power Plant, 7t. Belvoir, Va. (3 months). .s completed May 1968. U.S. Army simulator training, U.S. Army Nuclear Power School ( 2 weeks-), completed December 1972. Westinghouse Simulator Training, Zion Training Center (2 weeks), completed June 1977. e Westinghouse Onsite Training. Expe rience : 1968-1969 U.S. Ar=y PWR nuclear power plant (SM-1). Ope rator/ instrument te chnician. Alt ernate d between operations and maintenance. Qualified as control room operator (reactor operator) and shif t supervisor (senior reactor operator). 1969-1970 Shift supervisor (senior reactor operator), U.S. Army PWR nuclear power plant (SM-1). Responsible for supervising shif t personnel including reactor ope

ators.

Also assigned duties as the Instrmsent Papair Supervisor. 1970-1971 Maintenance Supe Nisor, U.S. Army PWR nuclear power plant (SM-1). Responsible for imp 1.+menting usd supervising the routine and shut.devn maintenance programs. Required to be si.if t supervisor qualified. 1971-1972 Operations Supervisor, U.S. Ar=y PWR nuclear powe : plant (SM-1). Responsible for super-vising shift personnel including shif t supe rvisors and reactor operators. Involved in refueling and core physics operations. Required to have shif t supervisor qualifi-cation. l 13.1 -45

m + ,yg M .TABI.E 13.1-1 (Continuad) RESUMES 1972-1973 Shif t Supervisor, U.S. Army PWR nuclear power. ' plant (IG-1A). Responsible for supervising shift personnel including reactor operators. g% Involved' in refueling and core physics t operations. E t\\1 hd 1973-1973 Maintenance Supervisor, U.S. Army PWR nuclear - g 4.g t power' plant (MH-1A). Responsible for implementing and supervising the routine .() fr)t4 o and shutdown maintenance program. Reqhired g to b2 shift supervisor qualified'. j { 1974-1974 Assigned to training and nuclear power plant g support activities, U.S. Army nuclear power program, Ft. Belvoir, Va. 1975-1976 Operations Supervisor, U.S. Ar=y PWR nuclear w g power plant (MH-1A). Responsible for super-3 M', vising shift personnel including shift d[QM supervisors and reactor operators. Required' o y to be shift supervisor qualified. Additionally b f. p respons1ble for supervisfag plant security-program and operator training / retraining p rogram. .d 1976-1977 Plant Superviscr, U.S. Army PWR nuclear g [ 11., power plant (MH-1A). Responsible for supervising the operation, maintenanc'e and hy health physics personnel. Involved in a 2Q major ECCS backfittfag project. I 1977-1977 Assigned to Nuclear Operations Group. South Carolina Elec,tric and Gas Company, Virgil C. Su=ner Nuclear Station as a g training operator. Duties included ~ ID operating procedure development and on-site training, k 1978 Assigned duties of shif t supervisor, Virgil C. Su=mer Nuclear Station during 00 the construction and start-up of the ( nuclear station. Duties include operating procedure development and assisting in plant start-up. i 27 Accu =ulative work Nuclear Power Plant Operation 84 months i experience before (U.S. Army) fuel loading : 24 l Nuclear Power Plant Start-up, 44 months Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station 13.1-46

C EOT, ;^^; PO TABLE D.1-1 (Continu1d)

JE*] IIID-

~ ~ ~ RESUMES Shift Supervisor l Appointee: Woodrow K. Koon Formal educ'at

' 1965 Mid Carolina High School, P

' e rity, S. C. i 1966 Five months U.S. Ar=y b t raining. l 75 One month basic math algebra review. Training: Wes ghouse Training: Zion inin g ' Cent'er,

Zion, 111nois.

Funda= ental nue r technology training ~ (con:pleted J / 976). 2. rating P ' observation (c lete ugust 1976). \\ N Simu \\ training (cot:pleted November 1976). 3. 4. Desi eture series (ce lete July 1979). g Onsite basic atematic d physics review.' I g (completed March 1976). Westingho e Onsite Train Expe rience : 1973-19, Station attenden SCE&G Wateree -Station I fossil-fired stean lant. I \\ 197 1978 Reactor operator tra ee, SCE&G Virgil C. Su=mer Nuclear Sta / m. \\ ,978 Shift supervisor, SCE&G gil C. Summer Nuclear Station. 1980. Two months operating experien, at North Anna Nuclear Station. Accumulativ work Fossil plant operation 30 onths experience. efore fuel load,.g: \\ 2d \\ s M

~ hsydh wT 10 ' T (

v e y j $ 2. y

~ d TABLE 13.1-1 (Centinued) / l /,/ WJ ) RESUMES 70 months Nuclear r experience at Virgil C. - Nuclea g Station \\ N, i Nuclear po operating' crience 2 months N at Nort ana Nuclear Stati (7 T.) otal Creditable Power Plant 'g 8 years, q o months . Experience: s ,l 1 4 %e 9 e 4 4 e e e e e 13.1-51 1 1 1 1

TABLE 13.1-1 (Cs'ntinuad) RESUME s S M Viecs 2.] A33/37' ANT' MNJQC$c Maintenance '"--- = '-

i. "

Appointee: S. J. Smith ~~; Formal Education: 1965 Marion High School, Marion, Indiana 1965 Machinist Mate "A" School, Great Lakes, Illinois 1966 Basic Nuclear Power School, Bainbridge, Maryland 1967 U. S. Navy Nuclear Power Prototype, West Milton, New Tdrk 12 1967 U. S. Navy Engineering Laboratory Techni-cian, West Milton, New York ~ 1967 U. S. Navy Engineering Laboratory Techni-cian, West Milton, New York Training: 1968 Fairbanks - Morris Diesel Engine School 1968 8000gpd Evaporator Unit 1968 2000gpd Distilling Unit -1969 Steam Plant Components 1969 0xy - Acytelene Welding School 1970 Sound and Vibration Analysis 1970 Shaft components School 1970 Eigh Pressure Air Compressor School 1971 Inter Com:nunications Training 1971 Damage and Fire Fighting AMENDMENT M~ 13.1-55 l Suary115t JE-LJJi, 1070, p ,.m ?,(

O TABLE 13.1-1 (Continu2d) RESUME services _ Assrs m M wppaAy Maintenance &; r L::: c Correspondences Courses: .en. s-y Basic Computera Nuclear Disaster Control Engineering Administratiori ..) Basic Electronics Basic Electricity Steam Propulsion Plants Trinciples of Naval Engineering Business Management Personnel Managenent Mathe=atics I, II, III Fluid Power Auxilliary Equipment Maintenance 12 Experience: 1967 - 1971 Leading Engineering Laboratory Technician and Engineroom Supervisor aboard a Nuclear Submarine. Responsible for Health Phys-ics and Chemistry Control for the Reactor and Steam Plant. Responsible for Maintenance and Operation of all Mechanica,1 Systems. 1971 - 19'74 Leading Petty Officer of the Radiological Controls Division aboard a Nuclear Submarine Tender. Responsible for procedures, planning and supervision of Reactor Plant Main-tenance aboard ten (10) Nuclear Submarines. 1974 - 1977 Engineering Watch Supervisor and Engineering Officer of the Watch aboard a Nuclear 13.1-56 AMENDMENT m my,g 11 M;;..u.2.i, m7 2?C ^.k rj,7 ?l

l t TABLE 13.1-1 (Cent,inu2d) RESUME /25stsThp/T AMqqMaintenance, L.s'e:a.Qtces r-- Submar ine. Responsible for ' supervision of a 22 man Machinery Division and for the proper opera-(k tion and control of the Nuclear Power Plant. MM N v.l aw t 1977 - 1978 Associate Engineer, Babcock and Dhqp Wilcox Co. Responsible as the coordinator and ~ gM43 supervisor of maintenance activities (electrical h mechanical and Ini,crument) at five (5) different 900 MWe Nuclear Power Stations. ga s gkbg 1978 - 1979 Mechanical Maintenance Supervisor, k5 M V. C. Su=mer Nuclear Station, Responsible for zu i planning, scheduling and supervising all Mechan-ical Maintenanhe activities. h 1979 - :'r ml.: Maintenance Group. Supervisor, V. I 19B l C. Summer Nuclear S tation. Responsible for-24 planning, actieduling and supervising all } gc' (p maintenance group activities. ~k I 1 m Accumulative Work Experience Before Tuel Loading: Naval Nuclear Experience 120 Months Nuclear Power Plant Theory 12 Months 12 and Design '20 13.1-57 AMEN -:5 ~ " 7o N % =DMENI iW .=

IAst.. la.1-1 wontinu;c/ ~ AFLENUMENI W Zy - AL7.1^01... ' 2*4 'ETC. -Ei!C?lCf.' SUPERVISDR < ~ ' 7cpwy!i BL-APPOINTEE: C. J. McKinney Formal Education: 1965 High School, Cocoa Beach, Fla. J 1965-67 University.of Florida Industrial ~ ~ Engineering, Gainesville, Fla. (No Degree) y 1969 Electronics Technician (Communciation) Class "A" School, Treasure Island, San Francisco, California ~ 1977-78 Tri-County Tec, Electronic E'ngineer-l19 ing Technology, Pendleton,- South Carolina f 1979 AA Electronic Engineering Technology, Midland Technical College Columbia, South Carolina 24 C 1981 - University of South Carolina, Business Management 1969 Class "C" School (AN/UZQ-6B, AN/SLQ-19 and AN/APR-25j 1970 Class "C" School (AN/SRC-20, TSEC/ WR-37, and TSEC /W-7) 1971 Class "C" School (AN/URC-58, and AN/VRC-46) 1972 Class "C" Sch'ool (AN-UCC-1C) 1976 Elee trohydraulic Control's and Turbine 13 Supervisory Instruments Training Course pre-sented by GE, Tampa, Florida l l l l 13.1-57h

.e - m_ t_ ~J'e. Nun ty, 81 %1. + v-Experience: M h) 1974-1977 Instrument Technician, Oconee s - Nh Nuclear Station, Seneca, S. C., Performed 1D Nd Calibration and maintenance on reactor plant 3 E N 'g .a z g equipment Q U' s d A* 1977-1978 Electri.calSupervisor,Oconee-W d! E Nuclear Station, Seneca, South Carolina, tp. g g responsible for maintenance and testing,of OM* electrical plant equipment during power s2,- -{ Q operation and three refueling outages. 1978 t.ssi M. .a-Electrical Supervisor, Virgil C. ~ Summer Nuclear Station; Responsible for main-13 l 5 tenance of all electrical plant equipment. 1 Q t y ~ Accumulative Work .24 Experience before fuel loading: Total Creditable Nuclear Power 96 months Plant Experience O e a l l 13.1-571

TABLE 13.1-1 (Continu:d) AMENDMENT a,a i ggsuggs

rowa stez l

l l L Shift Supervisor 1 / i f~- Appor ee: William F. Slater / _e a t

/

L Formal Edu acion , 1959 Carrett High School' - Charlest n S. C. High School G. E. D. Certificate f Equivalency 8/62. \\ t August 1974-1976 Trident tech. Collega quar-l 13 ters in mech. Eng.,.(Dr pped last quarter to (. training foI V C. Summer Nuclear . start ation). I Training Jan. 64,g' I weeks - Completed Boilermen class " " chool U. S. Navy - Phila. PA. Dec.

964, weeks - Satisfactorily completed 1

psi Bof1 and, fuel water testing & k reatment cours. U.S. Navy. j \\ Sept. 1965, 2 weeks - Satis.factorily com- \\ pleted Boiler Wate emistry School. U.S. Navy. \\' \\ \\ Sept. 1968, 4 weeks - Sat'sfactorily com-i pleted Boilerman maintenan course. U.S. 2 \\ Navy. \\ h Oct. 1972, 2 weeks - Satis fact ily completed j military counseling course. U)S. Navy. \\ Dec. 1973 - Satis factorily completb ICS I f Power Plant Eng. Division one course SCE&G. l 2 13 13.1-571.

TABLE 13.1-1 (@cntinuad) Yanarf, 8% %L 5'["'r M] - \\J Sining (Cont'd) July 1974 - Scris fcetorily completed ICS \\ Power Plant Eng. Division two courses-- S .\\ March 1976 - Basic math & Algebra ev, 1 I \\ month SCE&G. - N June 1976 - Completed Fund tal Reactor j Training Program Phase I at estinghouse j t Training Center . Ill. 4) f .a j 2 Aug.1976 - Comp 1 Operating PWR Training I Program - Phase - Westinghouse Training b Center - Ill. b - Completed PhR' Simulator Training \\ v. 197 t Pro - Phase III - Westinghouse Training l Cent - Ill. atisfactorilycohleted' fire J y 197 ighting ud entals 42 hrs. course. Satis-13 factor 11y ted Industrial Fire Brigade Training 16 h s. course. Experience : Oct. 1961 to Oct. 963 - U.S. Navy - USS Robinson DD562 Boi erman 3rd class. Quali-. fied all vacch stati ns, general work on valves, pumps and boi rs, calibration of gages and remote indica s Jan. 1964 to June 1966 - S Navy - USS Kitty Hawk CVA63 Boilerman', t class. Super-vised maintenance and repair \\ ' 2-1200 psi foster wheeler P class boilers, nd associ-ated aux. pumps valves and gageb., Supervised general clean up of machinery ro and [ training of 14 men. \\ l-l \\i ( 13 "Mm

mr TABLE 13.1-1 (Continued) AMENDMENT M2*[ ~ M4f.,%, 1361 Ts M nty,1162. 6 Experience ont'd) July 1966 to April 1969 - U.S. Navy SS Bridget DE1052. Senior Boilerman on board. S vised all -s aspects of fire room operat* repair and c- \\ s upkeep of records. \\ \\ pril 1969 to Jan.'197 - Plant Hagood SCE&G 13 s 'f ssil fired steam ut. Beld positions of'

ion Attendent ist Asst. Boiler Operator an oiler Oper or.

Jan. 1 6 to'1978 - Reactor operator trainee. . C. Su=mer Nuclear Station SCE&G. p.' 4 I ,/ 1978 to re nt Shift Supervisor SCE&G V. / C. S er Nuc ar ation. 19 2 to present - mb of USAR assigned to o e intermediate int nance activity, Ch rleston S. C. Boil rua chief. Supervised. l 13 a 1 aspects of valve a p ps maintenance, oiler repair, overhaul f v -ious oil coolers and heat exchangers. Ugk ep o repair records and personal files or men. 1980 - 2 months Nuclear Plant ope ating experience at ' Zion Nuclear Sta ion Total Creditable Power Plant exp ri nee at fuel load: j i Fossil Plant Operations 171 months ! l Nuclear Plant experience, 70 months 24

v. C. Summer S tation

{ Nuclear Plant Operations, 2 months [ Zion Nuclear Station s 4 ( Total M 20 years 3 month s [ ~ 13 13.1-5 7n

L TABLE 13.1-1 (Continucd) RESUMES thi l.u.i 'eg Op:-eizer-2. \\ c t , ~j v 7 \\

J..'

.1 .j..~.-~ - Appoi' tee: Carroll L.' Ligon ?. .. ( c. .~. \\. ~ 6 M.'rmal Ed ations i j 4, 1949-51 Mechanical Engineering, Clemson p Iversity, Clemson, S. C. / s .i 1960 BS Degree, Military Scien ', University oPMaryland, Col'egePark, Maryland,/ 'd l 1966-67 Degr'ee, Busin Administration, George 14 Washi gton Univ sity, Washington, D. C. 1969 IBM Comp r Executive Course (2 weeks), St. Louis, Mo. Training: 1952-53 ' Aviation Cadets, dergraduate Pilot Training (13 I months', Foster Air ree Base, Victoria, Texas 1954 Squadron Officers School (10 weeks), Maxwell Air Force Base, Montgomery,Al ama d 1961 Air Force Supervisors School ( weeks), Randolph Air i t \\ f Force Base, San Antonio, Texas 4 1965 Air Command and Staff School (by co - spondence) Craig Air Force Base, Selma, Alabama l 2.*5 13.1-57o AMEEMEn p" Tanvang 19 g2, 23., dar A.mW

TABI.E 13.1-1 (Ccutinued) I f., I ~ i:- I.,5);. 1968 IBM 1410 Prog'ransning' Course (3 1/2 month Keesler .('. 14 j rS. Air Force Base, Biloxi, Mississipp ],* T. e, 1970-71 Air War College (10 months), ell Air Force Base, 'M, egomery, Alabama. (Al completed 'two graduate ele'et'ves, each lasti 5 months, Remote Computer Terminail and H n Relations) l ~ 1973-74 South Caro 1* E tric and Gas Company Supervisory l Develop t Program, base 1, 2, and 3; Columbiai Sou Carolina \\ Experience: 1, 1949-52 Duke Power Company, approximately 12 nths of sucuser jobs and jobs while waiting to e ter pilot / traini'ng. Jobs consisted of utility,'mac ine shop, p -7 and maintenance crews within the Duke Hydro System. / ~ 1952-74 U. S. Air Force l 4 i 13.1 -57 p AMENDMENT W L uers 19SLC.;;E, M01 x ?l // y e;s m

.I TABLE 13.1-1 (C::ntinusd) l 1953-1960 Various Pilot Duties. Actively flew dai , includ-ing air defense, all weather,.and pil instruc-c;l ional upgrading flights. Flev app ximetely 4,000 '5 \\ ing hours, mostly in single en e; lighters or l ^ je ~ trainers; however, accompli ed approxima'tely j 300 urs in multi-engine air aft,'. and currently hold a ommercial multi-eng' e jet license with an instrum t' rating. b 1960-1962 As sis tant ight Comma er, Ins'tructor Pilot. Assisted and upervi flight training for approxi-l mately 45 stud to icers and'15 instruction 10 pilots. Schedul aily flying training for the flight. Evalua the flying training by t,escing both students n in tructors. Flew with students l who were hav " diffi lties in the program. Counselled ents con rning flying, other train-I ing, and r onal probl i 1962-1965

chief,

.icer Training, add ional duty as Wing l Forei Training Officer, pil training base (360 stud ts). Supervised teachin s," officer. training cou es in pilot training. Repo t directly to the r ing officer on the bitse conce i the training i . foreign students from 15 differ nt ountries j attending U. S. Pilot training. Ass te in devel-j ping new graduate level training cour s o be f taught at all USAF pilot training bases tp -oxi-i / mately 200 classroom hours to be taught du n th e i i i 1 13.1-57q MMNT i huary/ : 951 "_":, is- .,.' < g 6 ,.or n_ .. ( w

TABI213.1-1 (Ctutinu2d) j ) Q training year). Continued to counsel st6 dents b ing difficulties. Worked with the, town's pe ~ local, state, and Federal officials in dev o ing a [(' foreign training program which included ac vities uilt around the "American way of li ." Program-

t.,. -

/ so successful that it was pres t as a model g.ig l , 24 w s r ~- pro am to Mr. Katzenbach, Under e etary of ~ Defen 'e., to be fully developed approved as a I .standa foreign training pro. for all of the pilot er "ning bases. ~ C. 1967-1968 Chief, Curren Operation Headquarters, 35 Tactical Fighter Wing, tnam. upervised the unit respon-sible for schedul ng d coordinating approximately p r d' y for 3 fighter squadrons - 70 combat aircraft a (24 aircraf t each) omber squadron, and the No. 2 Required close coordina-Royal Australian qua n. tion of higher ieadquar e s, the maintenance, muni-tions, and f1 ing' units. ew over 200 combat mis- ~ sions in ~ ad ition to superv 's g the above opera-tion.' F1 with all units to g in understanding of ~ their u que problems. Wrote t tructions for air-14 craft its who were directing A tralian aircraft in. get areas. Designed chart s stem to gauge a cu ately the future utilization expenditure of va lable combat resources. 1968-1970 ief, Automation Division, Headquarters, Air Force ocmunication Service. Supervised 38 pers wel of the Command and Control Computer Center. Ce ter provided IBM 1410 operation, sof tware develop t, . and computer operational printouts distributio o all of the headquarters staff. The purpose was - / possess a quick response from a worldwide reportin 13.1-57r AMENDMENT i I*M9/ "JE... A :s o 1-

TABII 13.1-1 (C:ntinuad) 1 ~ 1 system. Directed development of a worldv' readi-ness reporting sys. tem to improve the

bility and a

availability of communications and.l'ght naviga-t ional aids. Developed more co e in-house pro-e res for better control of o loads and projects ~ a\\ with procedures to im ov accuracy and time-- N lin of automated repor Coordinated and imple-14, mente.a time-sharing pr gr with the Military \\ \\ 1 Airlift 'o and to imp v their worldwide operation. i 19;1-1974 Acting Chie. Force ations Branch, Headquarters, , ' {. ? U. S. Readine Co Acted as Chief or~as l Action Officer 'n the period'. Supervised the workload of the b ch who monitored and analyzed the personnel, e ent, and training readiness of l major U. S. an ' r Force units located in the 5 l 26 Continental U -ed St *es The command's task was to furnish t necessar m power' and equipment j resources t other parts f the world during a crisis - r example, new I support to Vietnam. and aire ft support to Isra 1. humanitarian efforts l '28 to Nic a gua, Iceland, and Af 4 e. Coordinated joint fforts of both the U. S. A y and the U. S. Air or ce. Made operational dect i ns for Commander in,ief of the Crisis Management m. This team activated during periods of cris or contingen-wa e es with representatives from all the taffs. Made j tudy of the Joint Operations Division; ecoumenda-l tions resulted in reorganization of the ision l involving other units outside of the divi 4 I i E ) 13.1-57s g q s[ #~MNT & V ~RSW}j

^r, '.C31

~- ~ TABl.E 13.1-1 -(Cantinuzd) 9e\\ 9/7 - 11/78 South Carolina Electric and Gas Company, V. C ,/ peh Sumer Nuclear Site - Warehouse and Docu e visor. Res'ponsible for che, receipt, a ra ,.and issue of all safety and non-safety e.ala/ equip-N.l. ment utilized'to build the V. C. S . Nuclear Plant. Responsible for' the rece

storage, index-try, control and distribution f

11 QA design, onstruction, historical rec s and drawings 'uired by U. S. Governm regulations and for the co v ience of construcci personnel. Also respon-sible the reproduct' effort to support,all i nuclear te l Manpower equipment, systems and inside\\ personne outsi e work area were requisitioned and developed *o port the above responsibili-10 ties. Especial n teworthy was a microfilm / mini- ~ computer syste e re and retrieve QA records which was co

ived, signed, developed and imple-mented over e four r period under the Warehouse and Docum t Supervisor direct supervision.

Con-l trol of is system will

a later date be turned

\\ over fr the QC Manager, . struction, to the Mana-

ger, C. Sumer Nuclear St ion.

Also noteworthy ] reorganization.in tegrati the SCE&G Document was S ion (Vault Area) and the Re uction Section the Daniel Construction Comp n Master File and istribution Sections. To expedite rdina tion and' paper flow among the Sections, the W house and Document Supervisor implemented the re anization under one head, and streamlined procedur for docu-ment handling, reproduction and control. j s\\f81 11/78 - h ;~r. Same Employer, Administrative Supervisor, V. Sumer Nuclear Station.b5fE NM Y l'2 2 * [ Dartec. r o R. o;= hm e a T3e q 5A% g empI._,y,.R ll-81 D EM i-V.c.. Sum cf;L hju di e4 c., STAT %. j 13.1-57t g MNDMIn W '.' *. m %, m

TABLE 13.1-1,(Continued ) t i Responsible for administrative activities I g, required to support the Plant Manager an his staff in. iaf ely maintaining ,/ - i -and operating the nuclear plant. In ~dition, accu- - i ~ mulating, storing and retrieving icy Assurance .I records related to the design, ,fa ur$, con-e truction, repair and operati activities of the ; ear power plant; commun' y liaison activities o major responsib".i.es for this position. are .Accunulative Hydro Po r lant '12 months Work Experience be fore Fuel Nuclear Power Construc tion 50 months Loading. (Wareh ousing; oc t storing, retrieving, r pr du on, distributing 2 and control.n.) \\ p l Nuc e Power experience at V. C. 37 months Su r Nuclear Station (Adminis-t tion) before fuel loading. ~ Total creditable power plant years 8 experience onth: 1 f ?_ 6 h l l 13.1-57u \\%'L AMENDMENT M W*"9 / m=w i. %~f

TA$LE13.1-1(Centinuad)~ AMENDMENT w,, ',-,ca r _ TL _ m RESUME g ~ M 5779f/r O q tq Technical Support E,-- ~ ~ 2 3'. l Appointee: _ B. G. Croley.-

~

Fonnal Education: 1960 Corbin High' Schbol", Corbin, Kentucky 1965 B. S. in Nuclear Engineering, University of 20 Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee ',T '5 1968 M.S. in Nuclear Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas ~ Training: 1966 Nuclear Defense Planning for Architects an'd Engineers 1966 Qualified Fallout Shelter Analyst 1975 Functional Analysis of Control and Portection Systems 1977 Nuclear Power Plant Systems (Phase II). 1977 Nuclear Power Plant Operations ' Simulator (Phase III) Wes tinghouse Training Center, Zion, ILL. 1978 Reactor ' Core Engineering - Fuel Management. 13.1-57w

TABLE 13.1-1 (Continuad) AMDCMENT g = =. w g = .,.~s Spwy, MCL simulator programs as well as tours of the Zion - Station to teach utility personnel nuclear power. plant systems and operations. Also assiste,d'in development of Westinghouse Nuclear Training ~ Center instructional programs.. ~ ~ .y' p 1978-1979, Manager, Reactor Protection Evaluation,. -{ Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Monroeville,' 4 Pa. Managed group whose responsibilities included licensing and safety related activities associated with reactor design including reactor internals, fuel, ins trumentation and controls, initial tests and operations, and plant technical ~ specifications. Safety Analysis Report documentation was prepared and defended in support of Construction Permit and Operating Licenses applications. Support was provided at meetings with the ACRS. Directed and coordinated efforts

1eading to resolution of a variety of generic licensing issues, including prime responsibili'ty for fuels related generic licensing issues.

1979 Technical Support Supervisor (See FSAR Section 13.1 or Administrative Procedures for Res ponsibilities. ) \\ l98) A sst:rrAbrr M hpq eg,Tsekyy:.os t. VRg/ L C SommeR. SuppoP T AT'THE: / Oc ltt A A STATICM (TGEEF %hR SN d l 3,l og. ADMlM ISTASTA VC W~r@vR.CS Fo% P.% PoN5!* W 'E$ l 13.1-57:

0 1 TABLE 13.1-1 (Centinued)

",'i f ~

<n-e- ~

I""7 17 62 ti RESUME Asm % y p/9,m ee,oPrRArIoNS -

i Appointee: Louis F. Stors -s Formal Education: 1971 B.S. Mechanical Engineering, Purdue ~ Dniversity Training: 1960-1967 ' Completed the following U.S. Navy Technical Schools:. Electronics Technicial "A" School Submarine School Nuclear Power School Scuba Divers School Ships Damage Control School 1972-Present Completed following Technical and Management Training: Senior Reactor Operator Training (Wis. Electric Power Co. ) Ansal Industrial Fire School (Ansal Co.) EPR Fire Protection (Marsh & McClenan' Protection Consultants) High Rise Building Fire Safety (University of Wisconsin) l Fire Protection for Nuclear Power Plants, i. (Nat. Loss Control Corp.) ] Fire Protection for Fossil Power Plants 1 (Nat. Loss Control Corp.) Professional Management Training Unit III ~ (Wis. Elect. Power Co. ) j NFPA Flammable Liquid Seminar Experience: 1960-1967 U.S. Navy, Conventional and Nuclear bub-marine Programs Accomplished the following: qualified ~ as a submariner; certified as nuclear reactor operator S3G and S5W plants; certified N.avy scuba driver; shipboard reactor operator certification board representative; shipboard reactor operator training coordinator; shipboard engineering department administrative assistant; and nuclear systems and instrumentation and control instructor - Charleston Submarine Training Center. 1971 PPG INDUSTRIES, Chemical Division, Columbia Southern Rd., Lake Charles, Louisiana 70601 t Mechanical Engineer (Lake Charles Staff 1/71-10/71) 13.1-57bb

l AMmor s__. .,xyI o,... TABLE 13.1-1 (Ccatinu2d) - ;.1 Jihuuse,y /98L REStME /iKJrrTMArT~MfpJOPERATIONS SUMMWeeee-I Experience: (cont'd.) Completed intensive

eight-week facility and system process orientation to learn -basic aspects of plant operations, which included the following:

Fossil power plant opera-tions and production of chlorine, sodium .. S hydroxide, chlorinated hydrocarbons ga. cline - ] additives, silica pigments,*and vinyl poly-mers. Responsibilities included the following: Assisting in the development, design through construction, and operation of a pilot plant J for the production of HC1. 1971-1972 BABCOCK AND WILCOI COMPANY, Nuclear Power Gen-eration, Lynchburg, Va. Contract Systems Engineer Was responsible for the design of nuclear safety features and nuclear auxili'ary sup-port systems. This. included: preparation of mechanical flow diagrams; instrumentation requirements, equipment specifications; detailed functional operating instructions; and solving system engineering problems.with architectural engineering firms and custo-mer's proj ect management. 1972-1980 WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, Milwaukee, Wis. Operations Technical Assistant II and III, Point Beach Nuclear Power P,lant (9/72 to 6/74) Was assigned general engineering work within the Operations Department, usually relative to data interpretation and system problem-solving. Was placed in a self-study program to prepare for NRC SRO licensing exam. Received SRO license (1/74). Was promoted to Technical Assistant III and continued similar work with additional responsibili-ties in construction follow-up and start-up. Operations Superintendent Assistant, Point i Beach Power Plant (6/ 74 to 11/77) Was responsible for all aspects of Opera-tione Department administration, except 13.1-57 c c

27 i l AMENDMENT GE t --y# b - u, TABLE 13.1-1(Centinu[d) U ^ i^ i ~.r.uv <ry 19 gz RESUME //psfW M,ft#joPERATIONS -F4PfHt4999R:- M ~ ~ Experience: (cont'd.) ' personnel. Duties' included preparing, reviewing, auditing normal and emergency 7, e ]) 4./ procedures, operating instructions and ];. ~ funetional and periodic ' testing. Reviewed j and implemented operational quality assur-ance requirements, implemented code and technical specifications' changes and pre-pared special technical investigations and ~ ~ field modifications. Performed surveillance of and directed construction activity. Held SRO License. Qualified as Shif t Supervisor (SRO) and as Nuclear Core Loading and Fuel Movement Supervisor. Was Start-up, Test, and Field.. Modification Engineer for the following: 35 gpm blowdown / waste evaporator system; 80 gpm reactor coolant gas stripper system; main steam dump overspeed protection systeiii-radioactive gas decay and removal system (first of kind); radioactive solid and liquid waste disposal system. Coordinated shipment of spent fuel to reprocessor. Prepared technical paper on Radioactive Waste Disposal, presented paper 1977, Atlanta Waste Symposium, published 1979. Also administrated all aspects of plant fire prevention and protection. During the period of 1972-1977, 11 refueling outages occured at Point Beach Power Plant. System Fire Protection ' Officer. Corporate Staff (11/77 to 3/80) The n.ajor duties and responsibilities of this position include the following: pre-paring fire hazard analyses; developing and implementing fire protection policies; training and inspection programs; property loss investigations; and developing /imple-menting loss control programs including all aspects of Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant fire. protection program. j Beginning April 1979, in addition to normal responsibilities, assigned to the Wisconsin Electric Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident Review Task Force as Nuclear Operations and Training Specialist. 13.1-57dd

AMENDMENT.St TABI.I 13.1-1 (Continued) L - %.1I Ja nueq,/187-RESUME 1 OPERATIONS SUEZIM30i ~ g //;sspr4v7"'Mget ) Experience: (cont'd.) -Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) (12/ 79 to 3/80.) Assigned to the original INPO staf[ on a loan basis by WEPCO. Worked on preparation ,.~3 ~ of criteria for. operational Benchdarks and an evalurtion program for Nuclear Power Plants. Was recalled fromJthis pdoject to act as Operations Superint endent at Point Beach Nuclear Station. Operations Superintendent - Point Beach ^ Nuclear Power Plant (3/80 to 6/80T Responsible for all as'pects of the Opera-tions Department administration and license ~ ac'aivities. During this period of time, two cold shutdowns were made to plug steam gen-erator tubes, and a five week. refueling outage was completed. 83 sg = 1980- e SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC AND CAS COMPANY, Columbia, S.C. Operations Supervisor - Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station Responsible for all aspects of the Station-Operations Department adminis tration. (See FSAR Chapter 13.1 for responsibilities). 19Bl-i%cSENT south OAR 0((A% Ejec@rc AnAD 6ASM My / i Assessmr MNJM eA > @eftA770PS % FLS

L L Sumrs n td>citAP. Srwrt&M

@EE FSA .SCCT"I 0@ lp. I RP. 9.ttsPot4 3/ tu LITI2"h 21 Accumulative Work Experience,Before Nuclear Power Plant Operation,- Fuel Loading: U.S. Navy 85 months Operating Plant Experience 105 months TOTAL Creditable Power Plant Experience 190 months 13.1-57ee m

i ~ ?l

g I

l. !}F!" 333 cs n 5 s

u. ;n J"o Iil.j l

5 I "e O .I g

If l;

Ub 3 55 lIj:. l':s ud /, a 4: wg 1 wg i I*5 L 1 3

:?

== l E "u. }g I u v! I d EE 4 I as 2 I - !i I if I g s:I I " !:gll w i 8: lE!3 "E I 24.l.

p

= 1 l*. l d g I i i

ji a

g l} l s:i g I.. [ t !I il . i..i ! s1; i .i .I i y Is!.

l

1 j.:

I ~

I

- g3:! lj1-li !3.( ti! l .}: ]I i I.li 3: I s ]>:ti: I to::! l I .: { 1.8 i .;g i 1.. . jjg j; 1 3.8 'I. I

I

" iI 1 li. !i} I jlaij att I

=

2: 1 11!

.I

s.!

.:II I 1 3 I I

. I:

I-1 1 j!.!! j l.g :

I Ij.

I 1 I .] i.3 II: g. -.a }g;s l I .l. =g I.y :

s I

lil ..9 I

^I

%i I ~ ,,I r---

J

I i

I.I ij I

t, ( i. s I.I. it! l i

g}

l!g::1 -- s 3 i 1j l. j 18! jj: Il. !g

l

I I}LI;I' 5.!

l 3

t!

{

I t ll{* I t i i$i I}ii:s..!. I:!. .I i i g :' i.! 8 8i! I.:.s gi i t

I

7..

x:1-

PRE $iOLNT S / CH4EF EXECU1NE CWWECER I I I / t rt cuts:E Estcutsvt Osct eatsect:1 V6CE Peisec(4T ~- aowine stcation orgaatsons xt Pet s cCs weca Pass.otav W isoalit ' mmr Estcuisvt r.noi.am tutcutwt Saour s ticu tivt isnt afGutcTaces tusimitanas a muctran WCat O sicut-Conslauciscas oP t a a T eOm s I I I (t anicaL LWhoLP asama4(a g..gge Pacouct now saove enour at u. u anset a saour tuosmit asus 'uamaGla unmasta a,uctuan unmasta ruacmassee cos,sve e oc meam pouctran then cet m as soas muct r as hamasta st avatt s t oc a mss e s toucavam taJCLEas tUtL o snaiums l I mausassuter l I I I I I 1 N 18A 4GER Pua C.4a s ans, Wa ka6( A W1maert Wam4Gia Isakast a tsahaet a CoonDiasatos 5* ty W A"'8I" n' kvono a YT.a.1. **s s_*4 a"tt.. o assa weet f esuctt na mucttan buct E a a "0""'I **' "I" ta PaDCUCf eces fl fosstL taa tamm aint t ut mea n.cv oea a anc,a itcawc at Ca ccs.s t auciaon z ueint r alm $ EnsenadE EAems oc te c t usu.e r aissat t assee tu'v"na'ces Paoe pt asassase t ou,ca,,t,3,s g g g g,,,,g ion g ovc at aan sal PaoJECT g9 A enahasta 00atlIV f CoselauCTOf Cooacamatoa - 'I I f ----- > ....a

==cioa .on s al .tsiin. oust u m sta PaoCuatutut totaPLlassCE & GC peoJECT PaodCf 84 " muct ram i s ys y t as s "sv 8 ' 8 3 E 8 "A"'88" **"'I' s l l 1 8 Ttcussac at ~ sta#F s taf f en attats ga astmIs a g g g gian g I De)ht OfflCE I I l constauction sitt cuntity muCttas coacCron siaccioA y 08, cose120L sit t suavrett aker stavsom gag,a sartiv twWt unmasta station W4 mast a sisitus et enovP w c. sus.u:n a,acumit t s auctina tavison sla11oM canimount e I

- EgIy,a tocurtats cctaeamstas contraucteos ovuta oc I

sortsvison a statt samet t unevaacross spicastists 8 3A'F ~ PtaWI starr savit a mot I itattaas*l AattMMt.T U

SOUTH CAROLIN A ELECTRIC & G AS CO.

VIRGIL C.SUntalER NUCLE LR ITATION h # vary,s11i Tigure.13.1-4 Soutin Caroline tiecette & Cao Co. flejetilodificattee sad Malatesance Orsentsattee c.att

r I HANAG,ER V. C. SUM MER NUCLEAR STATlot. DEPUTY HAHA0ER DIRECTOR STATION 1UALITY CONTROL DIRECTOR OF SURVEILLANCE SECURITY SYSTEMS SUPERYlSOR l I l 1 ASSISTANT HGR. ASSISTANT HGR. ASSISTANT.MOR. ASSISTANT,MGR. OPERATIONS MAlHT. SERYlCES TECHNICAL SUPPORT SUPPORT SERYlCES SUPERYISOR OF NAINTENANCE l l OPERATIONS FIRE PLANNER DIRECT 0n DIRECTOR DIRECTOR PROTECTION OF OF OF C00RDlHATOR WELDlHO CHEMISTRY SITE ENOR TECH SERY SHIFT SUPERYISOR l l SUPERVISORS MAINTENANCE CHEMISTRY ENGINEER $ EMERG l ENGINEER SUPYS. AND i COORD. CONTROL ROOM l SPECLS. FOREMEN CHEMISTRY l SPECLS. l l l l REACTOR STA. SHFT COMP TECl OPERATORS l l l NUC. TECid SUPY SERY l UT8tiTY MECil. ELEC. ENG. ADY. COOR ASSIS1 ANT

SUPY, SUPY, SUPY.

l l l l OPERATORS l l l l UTILITY MECfl. ELEC. l l l l AUXILIARY PERSONNEL PERSONNEL PERSONNEL TECHNICAL SURY. .DIR. DIR. DIR. ' OPERATORS PERSONNEL TEST OF 0F SCHED. l l COORD. H.P. _AoM. OUTAGE 11C MATERIALS l. l. l l t SUPY. SUPY. TECH H.P. ADMIN. SCHED. SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & G AS CO. l l P E R S '. SUPYS. BUDGET & OUT. VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLE AR STATION I&C I STORES & i l. RECORDS PERS. PERSONNEL PROCURE- ,p ,. E T N*E' Figierc 13.1-5 SPECLS MENT PERS, ,~ l % zes*y,IfCL Oieratint,StafI l { {* i .i f I l* l y}. I .[

I i E t.tERGEAIC Y PL ANWIWG T... & h _ in; r u i_. _. _., _ "r n

=_,,_.- "

2 The ' emergency *pfan to support a ' ^ full power operating license, which addresses the requirements of NUREG-0654, was submitted.under separate cover to the.NRC on June 4, 1980. Revision I to this document was submitted to the NRC on July 18, t1 1.980. Acd*3 low 1. += t'k'S 0*'U"'"T * * * *

h " ' Y Y* Y ' " A " "

O c roL*e ~2 0,19 80 Re-vossoa 3 to + L, e.t clocune m w, sufm i k./ d_ Ta.ava, t1, t9 yI. g e o ;,,, if j, p s &,l,,,,,,e x t wsi svi~**neJ: ea o btto I ir} 19gj, j e,,,,, a 5 p, .p,, Jea un any w,,,

r..

SJ $"I Y* o p) Oa y obst ' 7, /15 /. p-er e O e 9 y M D lemm8 e ammt e Se l i l 1 ct 134-0 AMENDMENT S AWEEISt,- WW9 Ta~e <y,19g2 A

t P Ya D e.s rr H9 b 3 r4 ESCIal NdTe Chs,JTer lb h pays 3 T h t-re M 4 tyr W9 YO efe.r-Y aN kh1 2 $_

a. r t.

+ O G e e mur 9

PftESa.CNT & CM4CF Eu(CUTivt ,0f f 4CER l 1 I t es Cxtey s tasCuisvg v.cs Pat s sc4 = T veCE Pe t s so(et ! acunesturson o saations I vaC4 P=( 84C4 Af veC4 Pa t siot al WTT e4Hbf M fatCuirvt i6aci,ap gatCu. tart Gaou,Entcu14WE 118 (EGutsIsoas gagsmg t es u a t ,unces o s(Cua. Constauctions n,suCLE&a-

t a aviou s l

l I I 1

==,p, %,,s,,,,i,, J, a a.aus ca~,

aou,

..m-= .a ~, o,,aa. n .,,a au s , a,.a .A,.au a a ava C au-. Co a, oc .Cu o ucun,wa aar .a uca o SE avsCC S L#CEhsik. (DoCall3m , g4,,gg, .uCu,,. l I i i I i i Amim o cAiusa anAmuta Mamasta uamana-- ,uaChas'ee. MahM(a MANA6(a W A 4AM a WaNA4(a enAhA4(a CoomothaToa s s 2n KDou.C so.w.o.,

=.r o s s.a t... gO,_,s uc M.i D h " *.h--'

huc.t r u seu.u as. ...u.ci.t a a. sj,sgatin ,,,0,C,Ll Aa, ,,"cg a a W o u muC m Co s auc i= 8 C ,L.,,,,,,, , m a,,,,, ,,,,,a,,,, . 4, noun ara m.. .,sa. taahA4ta cuaLiff ~ ~ Cop 4fauCTOf Coca0sNaton I f ------ i -C, a maecio. accion .A. .u... oun Paocuaturmy C M 8A"CE S oc peoJgCT PaonCT

I" *0"

~ .mu a mtEt taa 8 systrus "g,N,',',' sTatius uahaega samasta S(Ctmalf l I"* "'I I " I I I Tgtessac at ~ Staff S taf f ga A6(Wie 04 Astals A s sisT A47 BOWS off 8CE ] g h ~ CosestauctioM salt j QuaLiff asuCLE A= Ole [CToa DeatCToa De-CTom C ose T =OL segg suavtsLL a hCE sIA380N 8 l $A.aou, gg5]po,3 mamana susseus oC Ma W Ea mm , c, soi.ne y,,,,,, mucuAa sunavison sia tioM - "'7f5,6 e C =eausas Consvauctiom Cosela ACf os s SPECIAtt Ts s Taf f OgI",* oc oCC o swa stangevisos a STAFF S AN88 L PLAwv start 8'*** beaJees,r 71 SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO. Itsf Less yu,g.,g 313t VIRGIL C. SUMMER NUCLE 4R STATION Figure 17.1-1 Soutta Carolina Electric and Cas Co. Virgil C. Suommer leuclear Station Quality Assurance OrgantOtCon (Thart

Quality casurcnca cervicss are providsd und:r th2 dirsetic;n cf th2 Vic0-President, Group Executive, Nuclear Operations. This Senior Company of ficer causes the Operational QA Program policy and plan to be developed and specified. SCE&G Executive. level endorsement of and commitment to implementation and support of an effective operational ba+k +hr Presodem sud ckM Eurierske offte s4 29 quality assurance program is demonstrated byAthe Executive Vice i President, Operstions signature of the policy statement in the P' operational QA Plan. This statement requires conformance to the Operational Plan by all organizations performing safety related work relating to Sunner Station. The policy also assigns sufficient i) apthority to organizations to assure attainment of quality objectives. II The senior of ficers are provided periodic reports as to the status and adequach of the Operational QA Program including the Nuclear Safety Review Committee by the Vice-President and Group Executive of Nuclear Operations. 17.2.1.1 Nucl ear ' Operations m J The Vice President and Group Executive, Nuclear Operations, exercises managerial control over the engineering operation, maintenance and modi-fication of the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station through the General Manager, Nuclear Operati6ns, as shown in Figure 13.1-4. e 4 17.2-3 s "e.$ AMENDMENT M t.., 2 WM*S

i -.1 ) The Manager, Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station, reports to the General w s+k, +h ass ar+e.acz ef +1,z 11 Manager, Nuclear Operations. The Station Manager, +2 3 p r :: c.- Dseny. Sf ate ** M a* b5 si supervisory control o.9t*ver all employees of SCE&G assigned to the Virgil C. Sum:ner Nuclear Station operations staff and exercises administrative control over all personnel on the site. He is empowered to' imp'lement. ~ company policies with regard to the facility and has responsibility for .( \\ ' coordinating plant activities with outside organizations and governmen-He controls station functions through the ;;:sasrwr W4A]ts: fis 1 tal agencies.

up rupe,:._

r \\4 serokus Sveroes se r voees, i - e of Operations, Maintenanceg Technical Support and 1.Li..i:t:: r. j sM + af: e: lin: c u e.. iccr; ci-Qu lity C:ntr:1, &c.i th "c.yr i::, --f r 5

.;1.. "'.. *. 1 c ;;.

He coordinates the operating and maintenance require-ments of the plant and ensures that the plant is adequately staffed and' that operation is within the Technical Specifications of the operating license. He controls plant operating schedules to meet production. 17.2-4 21 AMENDMENT N Mett%, 'etei w

requirem nto. "a .n:::c; :.de - Le i. lulua, yie, - ..md tc. ;;in-s e ^ .t io h;J. y.cfici;.ra, 1--ol.

; ;p i ti~. p :::

He controls j W-modification proposals originating at the plant and utilizes information from the technical staff to determine that plant operation is within He monitors the cd ff ar7-ipp=: functions .c u acceptable operating limits.

nict: c Anosra.m Nw=.see of Jurporr Jerweca c%

at the plant and through the l ' ' i t:;ti;; Oup;;.*n directs activi-f.D _ ties covering records. He d:,ns ore.J c o o rd idep-lea snel t'*t e e schecletieg of

a. _c t: :. c i.., l i. u. w vet lug, 4 1*Ly.,oim vl 2'3

&.C'h ? *'t.*W-. *%,A'I"3 ?

t. I *?L C 21*]..UN.....!#Y...,...,.*.*2Y.. l. -.?..W.

f -= f* N''** o Tkg O T

r *
5 5 1 *l e =Y t* * *I fv"cr'el'! f* !*! Y' i.f; sin.4-tw Q C,,
l*

c

. : :I n-w dl..;.t ur. mi ; J.

24 y:; f a; ::x ::_: tier Oc , sud es rat = rate Gap c *, Mr*ekroo" $9 s Itl.~yh s ciasc c&n===to*u of m. 3<.rvnss Ce*wn* ,t te.skniques and information is maintained. s ,D ' Supervisory personnel assigned to the plant staff shall have at least the minimum qualifications described in ANSI N18.1 - 1971, " Selection 3 and Training of Huclear Power Plant Personnel" before assuming full responsibilities for their positions, as described in Section 13.1.3. 'Dej*ar y Descriptions of the duties and responsibilities of the la izt;;t Plant Au,mn Aa. Manager, the Cup::- E:::orsof Operations, Maintenance, Technical Support, "Ei 5eproet-Setvects D.. and f.2:! !:t::t!:, and the plant staff are given in Section 13.1.2. During the period of c.onstruction and initial testing, the Manager, 14 Virgil C. Su=cer Nuclear Station maintains an active on-site liason function while developing the Operation Staff. In addition, a Startup Group is formed of SCE&G, contractor and consultant personnel during this period. The Startup Group Supervisor reports to the Manager, Virgil C. Sunner Nuclear Station, and is responsible for the deve'lopment ll4 of procedures, pre planning, the conduct of the test program, and the initial startup of the Virgil C. Sum:ner Nuclear Station. The startup testing program is described in Chapter 14. l \\ l 7T 17.2-5 AMENDMENT M y-Munut = L e Ta m agy,t9g2 l( 1 l 1

17.2.1.2 Ouslity Assurcnca Anj Q eldy don ~fM De Vice President and Group Executive, Nuclear Operations, is responsi-qu.s.1Iry ss>u.e. os l17 ble for insuring an independent qui function exists within SCE&G to com- / J ply with 10 CFR 50, Appendix 3. He exercises executive control of this activity through the Group Manager, Nuclear Services. Responsibility - qus;y reogrsa s-d as M<= yer -C Nea.Is.e 9c ) d for qs administration is delegated to the Manager QA,^who is respon,sible for establishing, and assuring implementation of the Operational QA1 W[ Program in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, 21f i; 1.9 00 '.O h e r ti u h Q.'. " a g r r he Group Manager, Nuclear Services provides administrative control and t'l 3.<t.ry ass e a coordination of the role and mission of the Q!. 3 o~p-ow.He is responsi-

ti:;.

ble to, evaluate the performance of the QA program to assure adequacy and sufficient resources to perform the role and mission.f e is the link to H s'~t~d t'l effective 3 executive corrective action. Ease-Ne and the Managerr of As[**ryN W c -tro l Quality.k-have the authority to report quality matters to any - management level necessary within SCE&C in order to establish timely and effective corrective action. Disputes arising between QA/QC and any g other organization vill be resolved in the best interest of quality at O the lowest possible management level. If this becomes difficult, reso-lution vill be escalated through the layers of management with final responsibility for resolution residing with the signatory of the Opera-s4 n as-~yu.1 p.oes.a,. gc see tional QA Plan Policy Statement. De Manager of QAA tm required to have M che qualifications indicated in 17.1.2.3.oul w uth fy tht C:510 t e nicri r+Lw: ef a M er Qu:M ty N;;% erin; ::yuloih t, ~ vals sble.,04epe.laaee. FThe Cravoy M a.ospe, Nudeur. Seevoiss peo v.d e.y a ( yew e -n e 4> u s t,*r y A naes-ee S<.e rn o s s ~.! p-alsiy c..orest sa.er,6u s.aj, ~. pr f ro9ea.ma sis objst r oity o's ens Jrsl ace, Jils fl,,,,;.,J ug' is cai aes*J. y n .l (. 7.9 17.2-5a AMENDMENT 22 tenesh, une T*L"J*'y,I962

U he Grcup Maneger, Nuclect Services is reoponsible for evaluating the Pqmg overall ef fectiventes of the QMh d n.. 'the Manager of Quality bcm [ ~ ance is responsible to transmit periodic reports as to thd statue of the program and degree of implementation. -The SCE&G QA organization has t$e r ponsibility, authority, 'and or-gani rational freedom to: ~ O 1. Identify quality related problems. 2. Initiate, recommend, or provide solutions through designa,ted [ '. channels. 3. Verify implementation of solutions. 4. Establish methods to prevent: (a) further processing, (b) delivery, (c) installation or operation (d) use of a nonconforming item or procedure (e) or continuance of a deficient or unsatisfactory con-dition until proper dispositioning has occurred. This will include the authority to issue stop work orders as defined in appreved [y Tnis shall not include direct control of plant opera-procedures. tions. Functions of the SCE&G -QA organhation for the Operational QA Program include, but are not limited to, the follov!ag: 1. Auditing all participating organizations for ce=pliance with the Operational QA Program, and compliance with departmental procedures, ad=inistrative control procedures, quality control procedures, regulatory requirements and applicable docunents. 2. Issuing audit reports for action to canagement of the area audited. l 24 wA,'ay c.r,c.s o e artrorde.y t v~ r'="* e5 o f ~"d'r.s f.s r eg uaes at s,( ra.e r.co g G,-f- - a. a w := g r = p r m - ..u. #. m _.. = _ 9 7 <.sfe_o's,I syss! fisr su*~u, t o y QsAC, c e 4 n,y m g .I _ + s,, 21 m _m..m, m-____. bcs l'eu./ser c.a.] Crest E x a.<..o r,*.o e, Nu s t e e of c re r o~.r, r l 29 g h 17.2-6 AMDOMDiT S b w Jwaa'yj 971. 1

19 ] '.The Manpger, QA vill establish and r.aintain the Operational QA Plan in an up-to-date condition by reviewing the plan at least annually, submitting to Nuclear Operations and other concerned organizations any pro-5 posed changes for concurrence. Changes to the plan may be initiated by any affected organization. ..l nese functions are performed throughout the operational life of the ~ Virgil C. Summer ~ Nuclear Station, during preoperational testing, ' fuel- ~ ing, startup, operation, maintenance,' modification, and refueling. s.,) tue. 9 drr~ce rrel.,%en.'s - ld Rese functions are accomplished by the Quality Assurance SectionAstaffs-24 performing in accordance with the SCET,G Operational QA Plan with' the 8 following organizational arrangement: (See Figure 17.2-1) 17.2.1.2.1 Central Office QA Staff The Central Office staff provides overall control and coordination of the QA functions. The lead responsibility for the following activities is maintained by the Central office : 3 1. Pequired design QA activity, 2. Procurement QA, 3. Audit scheduling, coordination, and reporting. 4. Nuclear Safety Review Committee activity, 5. Reporting QA Program ef fectiveness to SCE&G upper r.anagement, m 5 6. QA Indoctrination, t raining, and qualification, 7. QA System development and nethods. { 29 ( 17.2-8 AMENDMENT S N, 98R Su9m y)912.

6. Corrective action requests. g. Ls.' 1 7. Stop work. 3 ~ ~ 8. Overall program effectiveness. 9. Identification of any undue production, ' schedule, or cost pressure. This organizational alignment assures direct (review, surveillance, and audit) and indirect staff interf ace to assure that verification. of ' ~ ,5 conformanen to established' requirements is performed by personnel not having direct' responsibility for the work" being performed. y I n<er A O .--> Tes or 8 17.2.1.3 Engineering Construction and Major Modification The Vice President and Group Executive, Engineering and Construction is responsible for construction, QC and initial testing up to operating ~ li cens es. 'Ih is is accomplished.as described in 17.1.- e ,1 e I l 29 l 17.2-8b AMENDMEhT A ( w- \\ % v y; t9 n i

T gferT b ~ s t 1, 2, I. '2. 3 Cc "r t*.I 0 N"* V' ## l i l % M*~.sm Wuelase pastory CemeI is e upo w'II* f*' d* " '~'

g ssiny co"rr* I **)"%

/ } e ylsemsa~ o f <ll astsers * / +A s suersar-7L. l <.? rag *i!Ilory fa, +ke fallwiky a.erluir,*, is malers,pJ _ ~i M +h' Ceura. I offiie ; dneIepes 7 e."d Mc+ bods 27M en i, Q c.

Jocrr*- ri;,te o%'y *.~J u*loli E*.ra-g 1.

Qc 5 mjor ~ *da h'uras Qc pr.y ras ol < eelyne~r soieo ere erNj 4, gp c sy<-r i l 1 I j ~ i i e l l 4 1

~ CpSt <, B [- ,_..b ~ 17.2.1:1,4 Station QC Staff (DSOC) . i..- *l The Director of Station QC is responsible for the direction of the Station QC staff. Recognir.ing the need of close coordination of the inspection function, the DSQC provides QC services under the Station Manager's (or his designee) D direction in the following areas: 1. General administrative control 2. Inspection work hours' 3. Scheduling interface 4. 9 Inspection planning' and coordination 5. NCN processing services 6. Receiving Inspection services ~ The Director of Station QC staff reports to' the Manager Nuclear QC for matters j relating to: 1. Salary personnel and employnent administration j 2. Te chni cal : guidance.and cons ul ta tidn l 3. Training qualification and certification. Stop work considehation 4. 5. Identification of adverse opeirations, schedule or cost pressure 17.2.1'.2.JModification, Outage and Inservice Inspection The Director of QC Systems will be added t'o the staff as necessary to plan, coordinate, develop systems and procedures for major modifications and outages. The DQCS reports to the Manager Nuclear QC. j

__p- ~ gerf.orming. evaluation of jotential bidder's list from Assis ,,,....... -Pttr,cha sing. 1 ,./ a a ,a**~.. \\ 2,. . Assist with shop inspecti. ons, audits, and, vendor or con.tra'ctor 5, surveillance when required...... ; V,,.:.-d* * ~~.. ~ ,p ,..,. *:y 3 7 1.. ,,/ : d. Activities 'o,f,Nucinr Engineeriing diidi may., affect the quality ja j.... ,of-safegy-rela ~ tea structures, systems and components shall be s,.

v..s accomplished in accordance. with written procedures, internal instructions, or directives.

f l 9. *z.1. 5 EJoc<rs - a. J Tr=l~,*-j. Edxeae m! te-i.,.,.e,ae d' a a. rr eud vaA< -tA< Geoq d." y-9 Ad=< " 't8 EJuerrn;a .J~T -,';.,;-y.- T4 a's o ap ";e raa is r*stom!< f** ~<~<se~c~r

ff.yv~r**{l','<-s,'.y.. fora'.a,'ay, z,, a jd'or&**, Y 4 e oa.}<meovw V*'U No^'-!lece~. rad +ee,4,,'eaf 9,,,,.of j. y e, e v,'e e.,

a.iJ e. i./,.ra:. +o +ke hek.~ ot< <~ r i..~.r p a,..,r,., e,,,.a p e,,. a. J sy,t-4 a 5 a ggee,.,) g,,,,,g e,,,,,e t y y,,,, t 6 17.2.1.# Purch a sing '"~~ W The Vice President and Group Executive, Rate Regulation, Pur,chas,i-tig,r-and Security provides procurement services to'. support'Ie o'p'eration of 21 ~. the Virgil C. Suurner Nuclear Station. This activity is directed managerially he Cent'i'al Manager of Purchasin'g' through 'the Manager .. f Er.odutnn and Construction Purchasing. The Manager of Production o ~~ -r*' and Construction Purchasing supervises the procurement. ' activities for the needs of the Virgial C. Subuner Nuclear Station.. Services are,... provided during cons truction, operation or plant modification. The functions of Purchasing in the\\bperation'al QA Program include"but are j not limited to the followingr ' i I j 17.2-10 AMENDMENT a tz- :, M;;

[nNsistyy49L-

l t 7 71 17.2.1.4 Supp rting Comp"nico, Vxndsra er Cantracter Orgcnizaticas ,21 1 SCE&G may utilize the services of ocher companies to provide materials or services and augment and support its staff in selected plant opera-tions, or modification and maintenance projects. To qualify for _ safety-related work, supporting companies must implement an approved QA program or work under the requirements of the SCE&G Operational QA Pro-gram. Use of the SCE&G Operational QA Program is limited to those cases where management functions are not performed. After purchase order or- ' contract award, the vendor, supplier, or cont.ractor shall conduct all quality related activities for safety-related structures, systems or-components, whether at the plant or other locations, in accord'ance with g l the appropriate approved QA program. '17.2.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM The Operational QA Program for the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station consists of managerial and adminstrative controls by involved SCE&G 24 rganizations, combined with surveillance and audits by the QA Section As described generally in this section, and following sections of this /! chapter, the organizations responsible for implementing safety-related action are clearly identified. At the discretion of SCE&G management, certain non-safety related activities may be conducted utilizing control techniques specified for safety-related activities. These activities are outside.the scope of required regulatory compliance and are dis-12 criminated by the term " Quality Related". All," safety-related activity is " quality related", but not all " quality related" activity is " safety-related". 17.2.2.1 Applicab'ility The Operational QA program is applicable to startup, operation, mainte-nance, and modification of the structures, systems and components of the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station classified as safety-related'. The safety-related designations for those Mechanical and Structural items 24 are listed in Tables 3.2-1 and 3.2-2. The list of Class IE equipment required to function during and/or subsequent to design basis accidents is included in Tables 3.10-1, 3.10-2, 3.11-0 and 3.11-Oa. The Opera-tional QA Program, as detailed in the Operational QA Plan, shall be M 17.2-12 AMENDMENT

I 17.2.2.2 Indoctrination and Training '~ .M stu'& +uJ,a*Eal 'l ~ Thedindoctrination and training for personnel in the Nuclear Op*k$u.r~' E;;n,.r, eur a +ne e,rssteproloMy N

F +4 e e.naci< rsJ CreapfGemst n* ay<*.. '

1

--i;; ;;d L wo..m

d ^.". ;;;rir,;ti;;;

1; 2 I-3 f_nostvu, < **rde r*= roof,, d ;e sree e.es r**VoJ*5 16; ;,, dry,, p C ' ': ' - f ;. i ? _. s roeni, t.cIlir(c.s by + k e W.; ^ ,. m'~M'*9M a*J "Traim g G rs.sp - T -~ L=-- ~~ o-- +-'W: - 24 'g 7_ _, 4_ -- -. 7 - .7 6 t Indoctrination and training shall be given to affected Off-Site ~and- ' ) 11 On-Site personnel on the content of the Operational QA Plan.and.' included 2 3_ policy and application of job safety related procedures. Emphasis 'shall. be provided periodically at intervals determined by the Manager, Virgil C. 14 Sum:ner Nuclear Station for Plant Staff and each respective Manager for other personnel including affected Off-Site organizations. - Each Manager. is GS,5 06 ' responsible tog:::13; documented evidence of: *a) personnel indoctrina-5 tion conducted, b) scope, objective and method of indoctrination and training, c) content of indoctrination / training material as it relates to the principles and techniques of activities performed. Proficiency. l of personnel performing quality-affecting activities is maintained '1 through retraining, reexamining, and/or recertifying. The requirements for training of station operating personnel are described in l' r.44. %./ c.e. p Section 13.2. The Nuclear 4 raining i. dic;tgis. accountable for T organizing and directing the overall stationAtrIining program and - maintaining records of personnel qualifications and gualification f The In;p, blocJear-1 Maweyer requirements, s a ;-fv. b 'is Cw w l b c;::r-. r e qusIor1 C* rrol m ^ w-dincter is responsible for training, qualification and 18 certification of Quality Control inspectors. ~h;- In cr ~' ~ Sr. P u n.-im o7 1E- -;- _i mi..iu. cur -.a qualifica' tion and . certification records of Quality Control inspectorsu/// S* *WN" SCE&G personnel performing complex, unusual, or potentially hazardous work shall be instructed in special indoctrination or briefing sessions. Emphasis shall be on special requirenents for safety of personnel, radiation control and protection, unique feature of.equipnent and systems involved, operating constraints, and control requirements in effect during performance of work. u-.

1 17.2.2.7 Maintenanco end Modific. tion A work request system'shall be used' to initiate innd authorize safety-related'==intenience br modification activities' as described in the ~ plant maintenance procedhres'. - $s m n -r 14m v s

r..a.

o The past Maintenance 9 ;r-" cr, is responsible for scheduling and n

~ 'b] planning work. Where the work request is for maintenance to a pre' approved procedure, the approval of the Shift Supervisor shall be obtained as reentred. O When a work request relates to modificat-ion and major '- '" Q i M a -- + -2 - T-maintanance to safe ~ty-relatef structures, systems and co=ponents, it requires review and approval of the Manager, Virgil C. Su=mer Nuclear Station, and others in accordance with approved procedures. If the' work request is approved, a package containing, as applicable, the approved work request, the approved design package, work procedures, inspection and test reports and direction for removing the items to be modified from service and returning the items to service will be devel-u {, o ped. 9A The SCE&GAorganization will review this information for quality { related requirements and a design verification (or documented justifica-tion to proceed without it$ and when work is to be performe'd by non-L operations group personnel, issue a release to work. The release to work may be issued by tasks or areas prior to implementation. The plant station maintenance staff may be augmented by personnel from other SCE&G organizations and/or contrac ted services. Provision shall 7 k be made for the indoctrination and/or training of such personnel. Main-tenance and modification work shall be performed under the supervision of station personnel. The inspection of such work is described in Sec-tien 17.2.10. Construction management and construction quality control ~{' 3 activity for major modification or maintenance will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of Section 17.1 as discussed in Section 17.2.1.3. 24 19 m AMENDMENT St [ msggqcj:::::ppet ( 17-2-20

l 1. Applienble rsquirsments of 10 CFR 50, Apptndix B have besn includ2d, l .2. The plans and associated documenta cover the required design, pro-curement, manufacturing, construction, and testing activities,. ~ 3. Adequate. internal control methods have been provided for subcon - ' I ~ tractor activities, and 4. Intended specific work functions are identified and established to afford a status check of planned activities, including' the. deter-mination of that status (accepted criteria). j ~ 17.2.6 DOCUMENT C0hTROL De procedures for the preparation, review, app'roval, and distribution of instructions, procedures and drawings described in Section 17.2.5 require that all specified approvals be obtained prior to the issuance of the documents for use. These same requirements are imposed on design documents. The required reviews and approvals ensure that issued docu-ments are adequate and correct for the use intended. The procedures controlling each document require review and approval of changes to' the document by the same organizations which approved the original document, or specify any required alternate change approvals. hssosre r !Ae"<r, S*tW r S'"*3 d The E _Ey-- _ is responsible for administration of the = - document control system at the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station. The administrative procedures for issuance and control require; 1. Documents are issued for implementation only af ter review and approval as required by the controlling procedure for the docu-ment', 2. A history of revisions required by the' plant Technical Specifica-tions is maintained, C 17.2-28 M %*sosty, lf f L

l 3. A descriptiva title, document date, revision numbar, cnd approval signotures era dispicyed en ecch documnnt prior to relecse for dis-( tributien, l v 4. Documents are released to a list of predetermined, responsible per-sonnel to whom the document of Section 17.2.5 are distributed. The . s ugpoer Ser smkr.Acc77es, list is maintained by the en., Receipt of 11, mr. 11 j;.$ documents is controlled.by a system of acknowledgement slips as-w s pec i f ied in each department's document control ' procedure. The relen'ses have provisions to assure identification'of current r'evi-sion and preclude the use of superceded revisions. ?It 5.' Documents' a ffected by design changes are marked and the area of change described to limit their use until revised documents are issu'd (see Section 17.2.3). e Each organizational group performing safety-related work is required to control procedures to similar requirements. 1,, Agents, vendors,- contractors for safety-related equipment, materials dif and services are required to have a document control system by the ~ SCE6G QA program. Control of documents to a.ssure use of applicable revisions is one of ~ the cheeks conducte'd during audits and surveillance by the SCE6C QA Organization including random audits'of procedure manuals to assure that all procedures are current. Jhc existence of. documents prior to use in fabrication, and ins tallation

7..

is assured by the review, concurrence, and issuance of the release to work by the SCE6C QA organizalion, as described in Sections 17.2.2'. 7 l19 and 17.2.7.2. ~~ 17.7.7 CONTROL OF PURCRASED MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES s 17.2.7.1 Source Selection Vendors of safety-related materials, equipment, and services are evalu-v ated and <clected as described in Section 17.2.4. The QA Program if 17.2-29 AMENDMENT rl3 l

7 w presence at inspection stations of inspection procedures,' instructions and/or drawings necessary to the inspection prior to performance of the inspection, and that items replaced, reworked, modified, or repaire'd are .g . reinspected by the original inspection procedure or procedures equiva- %.? . lent to the original inspection procedure. Surveillance performed by f ,the SCE&G QA organization verifies implementation of these require-e De independence of inspection personnel from those performing ments. the activity being inspected is determined during review and evaluation ( .of the vendor's QA Program at the preaward stage of. procurement.. ) + 17.2.10,.2 Onsite Inspection The inspection of safety-related work at the Virgil'C. Summer Nuclear Station is the responsibility of the oe sere e o f S f a. tio n 9C. g _. _ r: _ 2 =. This I 34 individual reports to the.'.::' pe, M mana iso e Q c,. - - _. 7 1 -~ of the Plant Opera-m --._o p,corerof JfnWea 9c 24 tions staff. Th e I - - - - C ea t. 2:.. n is represented on the Nuclear Group Nut. tea r Serss ce,s o p. S af ety R evi ew C oc:mi t t ee th rough th eA anager, i i., _ ; ". " u n.;1. - M d

R_tisc which assures formal review and resolution of conditions adverse Qc s he.f 14 %

to quality identified by the L., "E ~f__li.:t r. Assurance of relief from excessive cost and schedular pressure when opposed to safety is provided by ;?ht %*cnom.l, tst'"rro"9

7, 2, /,2: , y, 3-),, y,,,,,,,,, g isodola r / o a d::: w th i 1 -,_. 2 y..

n.; p1;;; -.;' m_ni: s+a. t Qc C : -. ' yos. r.n-1:o communicates directly with the L,~.c .;; J .r. 111:n;; s + % sa strffla plaua, g o.ev,L,, soJ e. .t ar,+. itura. se em es. rke prensr.e o f skh.- pc Og:: 1 ..,1 n t ' n p;;;i.. C _. 21... is responsible for the s 7'an.1 f. C inspection program. When necesss ary, the p1__pC_. :..,1 : H : a C ;; &. d._: my s4M be assisted by plant personnel, personnel from other organizations and/or by contracts for inspection services. The inspection personnel will be appropriately trained' and qualified by training programs respon-sive to applicable codes and standstrds and will be independent from the individuals performing or supervising the work. Two exceptions to com- / plete organizational independence are found in start-up and testing and operational surveillance testing. These exceptions are performed by s operational personnel in a testing capacity. In these functions, the tes ting is " confirming" the previous \\, a 17.2-35 1.1 AMENDMENT S EMSL

37.2.10.3 Inservice Inspection e. 1 SCE&G Nuclear Engineering and SCE&G Nuclear Operations are respons-ible for development of a preoperation baseline inspection progran and 1 j the planning of inservice inspectior, to be conducted at the Virgil C. s W, Summer Nuclear Station during plant shutdown. a ' he conduct of the ba T se- ' line veld inspection has been delegated to a contractor who will provide a the inspectio~n data and results to SCE&G Nuclear Engineering and Nuclear ' Operations for evaluation of the baseline data, and for retention in the 3 plant file as a permanent plant record. D The services of an inspection contractor will generally be obtained for conduct of the veld inspection of.<r..SME Code, Section II A 1 and 2 I ' omponents./As pection of Class 3 components will gene. I, plass p.tru.y wr e f %c *~ut .e m.sree toje H.. .w o n, c rally be_ m. _dM -+<. Hs u yer 94ryC-ml. %9 e,tm,,, rm/ by 0CC!.C p m, klar1, di a w 2 E., ^.L; ;' ,-.c i.. C _ J 1._ n. 14 The methods and procedures used during inservice inspection will be reviewed by the SCE&G QA organization and the conduct of inspection c. T'i subjected to surveillance by SCE&G QA personnel to assure conformance w/ with accepted procedures. The SCE&G QA organization also audits to v. assure that the baseline inspection records and inservice inspection records are properly maintained and retrievable, as described in Sec-tions 17.2.17 and 17.2.18. 17.2.11 TEST CONTROL 17.2.11.1 Vendor Testing As required by contract documents, vendors of safety-related 1 materials, parts, components and services for the Virgil C. Summer Id Nuclear Station, may be required by tbe SCE&C QA Program to submit a schedule of major events including all inspections and tests within v l six weeks of the receipt of contract documents. The tests l 7 p._ 17.2-36 AMENDMEh7 M MMEti, inAP 7*= Wary ii12 j

d identified on the schedule are those performed to verify conformance to >^ documented requirements 'given in such documents as instruction, proce-dures., drawings, specifications, etc.. including the testing ' require-ments identified'during design. The procedures for. control of testing, S., are submitted for review by SCE&G and are requi. red to describe the M testirig to be performed, when the testing is to be performed, the instru-crions provided the person (s) performing testing, including the accept- .l ance criteria and tolerances, the personnel qualifications required to j perform the test, what special environmental conditions must be provided, V if any, and the type of report to be prepared to verify that'the tes't ' results are acceptable. These procedures are reviewed and concurred with by SCE&G. Proper performance of tests and test evaluations to the accepted procedures is verified by surveillance of vendor perf'ormance and documentation by the SCE&G QA organization. ~ 17.2.11.2 Testing Prior to Power Operation C., The Manager,' Virgil C. Suncer Nuclear Station,' is responsible for the 14 development, administration, and conduct of the plant testing program prior to power operation, s ub sequent to the construction testing described in Section 17.1.11. su,ns<r h**!% The M Technical Support bu.___ and/or the Startup b le Supervisor are responsible for the preparation of the test procedures to be used during preoperation testing, core loading, and initial They may be assisted by consultants, as needed. startup test programs. The acceptance and preoperational tests are conducted to demonstrate that. the plant systems can perform their intended function, and begin l ig with system turnover and continue through. core loading. Sub-C sequent testing may not begin until the plant operating license luts V been granted, and consists of tests from initial' core loading through initial criticality and ascension to power. These tests shall demon-strate that the plant follows its design parameters and can be operated at rated capacity without endangering the health or safety of the public. Li 17.2-37 g f NM %l$h

i ? ~ The data from these tests is analyzed by the Startup Croup, with assis-s. 21 t.ance from"SCE&G NucleaEEng'ineering, Gilbert,. Westinghouse, o[other ^ consultants, as needed, to h termine'that the acee; stance crite$ a h$ve been met. The test procedsre,' test data, and evaluation become ' par ~t of the plant. documentation as described in 'Section 17.2.17. The testing' program and procedures are further described in Chapter 14 ~ The SCE&C QA organization conducts audits and survaillance' at' the Virgil M( .--t C. Summer Nuclear Station to assure the continued existenes and pioper implementation of the testic.g procedures. i 4 17.2.11.3 Testing During Power Operations 14 The Manager, Virgil C. Sumer Nuclear Station, is responsible for developing a test program which demonstrates the continued acceptab'ility ^ and operability of the' Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station without endangering the health of safety of the public. krs.rwr /*Leyers *1* The testing procedures are the responsibility of the M Technical o.ad se-.nes g g Support,_,.___.____ _ Maintenance C, m _ ; for equipment and sistems 'when they a.re unava'11able for op_ era. tion, and of the posecftsrisrm q bksp'r Operations *,- ' :: for equipment and systems when they are in opera-tion or available for operation. . The teste vill verify that plant nuclear, thermal, hydraulic, and other operating parameters remain within the acceptance limits determined during design and 'the initial' test progran. The test data are analyzed { t. g by the plant Technical Support Group and/or Nuclear Engi- ~ ns.:ing, with assistance fron consultants, as' nee'ded, to dete 5 ne that tiie acceptance criteria are met, and reports are prepared to record the data, analysis, and evaluation. Tne reports become part of the plant n.. records, and are maintained as described in Section 17.2.17. i l 17.2-38 '2.4 / AMENDMENT 4 i N; n mry,,,TrS2 i

~ Th2 SCE&G QA crgcnization psrferms audits and surveillcoces of this, test program to assure the continuing existence and proper implementa-tion of the program elements incorporated in the procedures. s 17.2.12 CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT ff.. 17.2.12.1 Vendor ~and Contractor Controls. Vendors and contrac tors of safety-related materials, parts, components and ' services for the Virgil C. Sunxner Nuclear Station, are re' quired to have a program to control measurement, inspection,. 'and test equipment, a's required, by. the SCE&G QA Program, unless the quality of items fur-14 n'ished can be established by on site receipt inspection, test or other l'15 methods as indicated in Section 17.2.4.3. The vendor and contractor programs are evaluated to the requirements given in Section 17.1 12.1 by the methods of Section 17.2.4, and surveillance is pairformed to assure s implementation of the accepted program as described in Section 17.2.7. ~ 17.2.12.2 Site Control s During construction of the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Station the control of measuring and test equipment is achieved as described in Section l1 17.1.12.2. I Subse %uent to commercial operation of the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear Sta-tion, the W Maintenance E_ seeeseu_r will be responsible for the -n-r n<-.Ws 2.9 calibration and control of measuring and test equipment. The calibration system requires the identification of equipment to be calibrated, the 5 method and frequency of calibration for each, a positive ~ method.of identification for each item, including means of determining the cali-I [- bration status, the documentation to be maintained, the recall method for tecalibration, and the review actions to be taken when equipment Is 5 found out of. calibration, including effect on previously conducte'd tests and measurements since the last calibration and action te be taken when l7 k equipment is ennsl.st ent ly out of callbrnt ion, Iluih r i be. Iantet rinni l i I..n, an equipment check is made prior to further continuation of serviceabf]Ity. ?!easuring and test instrument calibration is based on the required accuraev, l l purpose, degree of usage, stability characteristics, and other conditions 5 ( affecting the measurement. Calibration standards used for the calibrat' inn of measuring and test equipment shall'

t. T AMENDMENT C5 17.2-39

,-. c, :S T**'evy,110L

l l ~ have tolerance of no greater than one-fourth the required tole 5ance of the ,3 l measurement and test equipment being calibrated. The standards used for these calibrations aball have been calibrated against standards of lesser tolerance, which are traceable to nationally recognized standards. W ere .) ' such standards do not exist, a standard shall be prepared for the calibra-e +, auwh% servar T' tion, and approved by thdTMaintenance -, -- Where these require-9 - ments cannot be met, a written justification and basis for calibration 2 heen~r A"% s e a ss. shall be prepared and authorized by. the 96amet Maintenance empeeveeee g and concurred in by Director of Surveillance Systems. Reference and transfer , 91 standards which are traceable to NBS or other recognized standards will 5 be used where possible. Where national standards do not exist, the basis for calibration shall be clearly documented. a.") J b 6 s 29 17.2-39a AMENDMEITI et s -a.___1, i: ^ Ts"uney, N 1L

Tha SCE&G QA crganizatien rsviews tha ceacuring r_nd tsct r.quipment con-- 7 trol program to assure the existence of these requirementp, and per-se r *=e.e forms audits and surveillance of the plant Maintenanceproup to assure implementation. 17.2.13 EANDLING, STORAGE AND SHIPPING ' 17.2.13.1 Vendor and contractor Controls ~ ~ ~ Vendors and contractors of safety-related materials, parts, cohonents,. ~ . 'and services for the Virgil C. Sumner Nuclear Station are required by con-

15

~ tract or the SCE&G -QA Program, to provide a program and procedures respon-sive to specification requirements for the protection of, equipment during ~5 hand 11ng, storage, packaging, and shipping, including, as needed, the -use of specific procedures for the control of special environments,. including t'emperature and humidity, control of special handling equip-ment, and verification. of conformance to controls. The program and 5 procedures are reviewed and concurred with by the methods of Sections 17.2.4 and 17.2.7 to the criteria of Section 17.1.13.1, and the.SCE&G - QA organization performs surveillance as described in Section 17.2.7 to U assure the implementation of the accepted controls. 17.2.13.2 Site controls During construction of the Virgil C. Sumer Nuclear Station, the control of handling and storage is achieved as described in Section 17.1.13.2. During operation of the Virgil C. Summer Nuclear ytation,Manf**, the control f rnf tf rs*T of handling and storage is the responsibility of the M Maintenance C , 5er o cc8_ 11 or,5m % - sences Thehintenance T,- '::r is responsible for the preparation of a ~ cleaning, hand 1ing and storage program and procedures responsive to speci,- 15 / fication requirements which describe the methods and equipnent used for M 17.2-40 AENDENT 5 n- -..,---7 "fsMusef,t4St

normal htndling of items, and thsco for prcractica cf items having special handling and storage requirements. The program must describe r.- the measures used for the location and identification of items, and ~the maintenance of identification. Whenever special protective environments are required, the method of achieving and maintaining that. environment must be des.cribed. eps

33..

The SCE&G QA organization reviews the program to assure incorporation 'of the required elements, and performs audits' and/or surveillance to l 21 } assure the continued existence and implementation of daese requirements. 17.2.14 INSPECTION, TEST AND OPERATING STATUS 17.2.14.1 vendor and contractors Controls Vendors and contractors of. safety-related materials, parts and components are required by the SCE&G QA Program to have, as needed, within their material identification and nonconformance control programs, identifi-cation methods to assure that only correct and acceptable materials, ~ m C#.o parts, and/or components are used in the fabrication, assembly, proces-sing, installation, and repair of items. These measures must include provisions for control of nonconforming items to prevent further pro-cess'ing of the item by such methods as segregation,' tagging, marking, or other positive means. The evaluation and selection of vendors des ~ cribed in Section 17.2.4 includes determining that these controls exist... when required, and the surveillance described in Section 17.2.7 assures - that the controls are implemented. 17.2.14.2 Site controls SSQC The ,t_...

. _7

-- E - - u?' v{ vill be. responsible for applying inspection ,19 14 "'\\ status tags to items in the plant warehouse and the plant. The items are classified an'd dispositioned in accordance with approved procedures. l1@ Methods of disposition are described in Section 17.2.15. I' 21 h 17.2-41 AMENDMENT SP "E1._T 7, 1,;O i l Trev=q,1111

U na usa of stctus idantifiers' cnd centrole for operating syste::s cnd A m st..T r A *y r 2d compon2nts is th2 rasprinsibility of the plant),Opareticns 4 i The program prepared by thg, ' q pssowr hiv pe Opurent, Anare s7 p.r ti i..y _ A h =ci- :rr, g r -- i... t N pw pe, a$uu+<k Hey' 3.ee vi g % Technicc1 Support _, j r- _ n, intenance C, n. scs

are approved i

~ by the Manager, Virgil C. Sussser Nuclear Station and reviewed by the SCE&C QA organization for inclusion of requiressents for the use of status identi-fiers which control the use of items, systems and components in the Virgil C. Sunsner Nuclear Station prior to implementation. The SCE&C QA-organization performs audits and surveillance of the Virgil C..Suusser p Nuclear Station to assure the continued existence of these requirements and

I their implementation.

If surveillance and/or audit identifies any bypassing of required tests and. inspections, QA controls including nonconformance noticei, corrective eerion requests and stop work' au'thority exist to a ssu rs. 5 e rrection. Safety related. work is required to be conducted to previously I reviewed and approved procedures and bypassing without a formal procedural ' 11 change is not permitted. 17.2.15 NONCONFORNINO MATERIALS, PARTS OR. COMPONENTS e 17.2.15.1 Vendor and Contractor controla Vendors and contractors of safety-related materials, parts or (.omponents must satisfy the SCE6C QA Program which requires the vendor to establish. documented measures, as needed, to control items when there is evidence of nonconformance. his measure includes the ident ification, documen-tation, segregation, disposition, and notification of all concerned parties of the nonconforming condition. The review of nonconf nrmance and disposition authority, munt be defined.. Dispositions may be accepted "as is", repair, rework or ecrap. The measuren must include controls to prevent further processing of the affected area until the dispostion has been approved. When the disposition is accepted "as is", repair, ur [ rework, the documentation shall verify acceptability and describe the 1 - Approval must be obtained from Engineering with con- "as-built" item. currence by QA whenever the disposition would result in an item which would not satisfy the contract documents. The request for such approval [ 1 must be in writing and approvals obtained prior to cent inuing work. 7.9 17.2-42 NEEE # );n;q % % ~sn,l'*g

l l ~ Th2 SCEfic QA crganization cyclustes ths QA Pregrca of prospectiva vcadcrs for such requirements as described in Sec tion 17.2.4, reviews and concurs b with required inspection procedures as described in Sections 17.2.7 and 17.2.10, and performs audits and surveillance on vendors to assure the [ continued existence and implementation of the accepted procedures, as g described in See tion 17.2.7. N 17.2.15.2 Site controls l ',] The control of nonconforming materials, parts or componen'ts during V >construction is de- " M in Section 17.1.15.2., v..s m er M

m seeZen During opera tion, the ydesum Maintenance T, x h ---- is responsible for

.gg control of nonconforming materials, parts, or components in accordance with approved procedures. 'PSQ C The ly _ :. icr. Car'*nn:: identifies those items which do not conform I4 to requirements by placing an appropriate tag on the' item when acces'si-29 p5 27 The ! :p :=9cr NJ__... arranges with the responsible Croup bic. ..Y. Supervisor for the dispositics of nonconforming items. Nonconforming items are identified by status tags conspicuously placed on the item when accessible, and, when practical, are placed in a segre-l 27 gated storage location. Tk f C The P r; : t t r Car &o+or is responsible for preparation of reports of la e riun nonconformance end submits them to the responsible %re.*v Manger" ;n.h;r for e disposition,- i-d'=.MM h:15.u-m ' "=;:-:bes. The applicable ~21 f-Annraer hvHer ,N p r- -,-.. e or his designee must approve the disposition of the reports. For those nonconformances for which Engineering disposition is 21 requiredi QA concurrence with the disposs. tion action must be obtained prior to implementa tion. ~ DS QC Following dispor.ition action, the In, -t': C a z M..: Mr reinspects the 'li Item, or has reinspectica performed, and replaces the tag with the DSQC o appropriate status. tag. The I...,7_ Cr- "-^h r : then completes the 25 i re. port of nonconfonnance and places it in the plant files. l V 'g AMENDMENT M RLR-&S1 'fcwoot14fR N

p PCQC 15 l21 Tha L, s' m >'ar cnslycas the reports en n ncenform:nca fcr J trends detrimental-to the plants installed quality or corrections neces- ^ ,[, l " sary to the QA Program and procedures and report these analyses semi-annually 18 J to the Manager, Virgil C' Summer Nuclear Stati'on, N Manager of QM % s M---pe, Alucle.~ e Pn h *ry C = w 4

1. 9 j

m 3 m The SCE&C QA organization reviews the approved plant maintenance and," inspection procedures to determine the inclusion of these requirements . and performs audits and surveillance at the Virgil C. Sunaner Nuclear Station to assure the continued existence and implementation of these O. . re quiremen ts. 17.2.16 CORRECTIVE ACTION' 4 i 17.2.16.1 Vendor and Contractor Controls 14 .The SCE&G QA Program normally requires vendors and contractors of safety-related ma teria18, p a r t.;, components and services to have corrective 5 action measures to assure that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified, d'oeumented, and corrected. The only exception is as speci-15 fied by section 17.2.4.3. These measures must identify the responsibil-ities for identification of the need for corrective action, and the preparation and approval of correction action. The cause of the detri-mental condition must be investigated. When corrective action is taken to preclude repitition of nonconforming conditions, the corrective j actions must be monitored to assure that the cofrective actions are effective. m e[ s. The SCE6C QA crganization evaluation of the QA Programs of prospective bidders, described in Section 17.2.4, and ' audits and surveillance of vendors, described in Sec tion 17.2.7, assure the exis tence and implemen-tation of these requirements. 29 m 17.2 -44 AMENDMENT W ^ ( 3"wu v y, 14 9 2.

k'. 9. Radiographs. lJ

10. Weld maps and joint history records.

QJp

11. Verification of wall thicknesses.

'N:// Inspection and test proceduras must require documentation of results and acceptability, identification of the inspector or data recorder, t the type of observation performed, action taken to resolve nonconform-nd ing conditions, and the indexing of the ' ocuments for ready retrieval. d Data related to the qualification of personnel, procedures and equip-ment. used to perform special processes is also a part of the vendor or contractor records. Records required by procurement documents bear identification of the owner (SCE&G), the owner's purchase order number,- and the station name. The vendor must provide s'ecure and fire-resistive or equivalent storage for the records until sub=itted to SCE&G. When required by contract documents, the data packages forwarded to ^ i SCE&G by vendors will include, in addition to QA records specified in 15 Q-procurement documents, a certificate or vaiver of inspection provided by SCE&C QA or its agent and an index of the required documentation. 5 The existence of these requirements is assured by evaluation of prospec-tive bidders described in Section 17.2.4, and the continued existence and implementation of these requirements is verified by audits and surveillance, as described in Section 17.2.7. 17.2.17.2 SCE&G Controls I V It,,,,w nya.jr.artorr is">cv The AC..h- -- mh71= r.aintains the SCE&C perr.anent file for QA Records on the Virgil C. Sumer Nuclear Station. Complete records are maintained covering aspects of quality control activity. Inspection %/ reports, fabrication and test procedures, radiographs and other non-destructive exacination test reports and any other documentation l 5 u { 17.2-47 AMENDMENT S W -v moi y, n sz

5l as required by specifications, codes and standards are ret..ined and handled in accordance with written procedures. Receiving record reports, documentation packages and other recorde are placed in the permanent file where they are available for record, information, and QA audit. The reports on the baseline and follow-up inservice inspections generated as described in Section 17.2.10 are maintained in the permanent file, as are the results and reports on preoperational and startup testing, as described in Section 17.2.11. Plant operating records, such as operating logs, are also placed in the permanent file as they are completed. ~ ~ The retention period for plant records by the type of record is des-cribed in approved. plant procedures and Section 6.0 of the plant' Technical. Specifications. These procedures have been. prepared to 24 agree with current reguletory requirements, and are reviewed biannually to assure continued adequacy. The plant records storage area is required to provide protection against a destruction or deterioration caused by fire, water, humidity, tempera-g ture, insects and rodents in accordance with approved pro- ~ cedures. Records are required to be indexed for proper placement and. ready retrieval. Access t.wmar as.a,ye, s.w*#r s.evo,to the permanent files is controlled by the I .zg i e u. j M _.1: = ' : " j... ' 1 The definition of what constitutes a QA record, what the retention period is and the requirements for the l retention center are provided in ANSI N45.2.9 as eIcepted by the 24 'SCE&G positf.on on Regulatory Guide 1.88 noted in Appendix 3A of, this FSAR. a 11l The.SCE&G QA organization conducts audits, and/or surveillances to the SCE6G QA and p.lant administrative procedures to assure that QA records are retained and protected as required by the procedures. The QA records are audited by the SCE6G QA organization to verify that the required contrnis for generation, approval and identification for retrievability have been applied. 19 - 1 17.2-48 AMENDMENT 5 ~ ~ l h avney, 89 SZ l

17. 2.~18 AUDITS ne overall SCE&C audit program is composed of two sources of input;

. surveillance and audits. In the SCE&G program an audit is normally a broad based mutti Appendix B criteria programatic evaluation which con-siders "could it work" system functionality. Surveillance is normally much narrower in scope (one or, several criteria) and is deeper j penetrating into examining sufficient evidence of actual work activity (lu process or documentation) to confirm satisfactory results. System attribute and. type II surveillances are defined as'programatic in-depth r ], observations of a safety-related activity, task or quality system which ~ is' investigatory in nature and seeks to determine and explain the program rela'ted cause of observed inadequacies. We result is an eval-untion of the functioning system (s) which determines the effectiveness 20 of a subsystem or system. Rese surveillances isolate on ~one or several cor. trol mechanisms or program criteria to assess in detail, utilizing audit techniques, the functionality of that control. Extensive system ~ and type II surveillances provide a much sharper, more detailed conclu-sion of the implementation status ar.d adequacy of any QA program .provided that a series of surveillance is evaluated to cover all appli-cable criterit. A lead auditor is able to judge QA program compliance and adequacy by a thorough evaluation of surveillance report corrective action, '. follow-up, and quality history. In the most positive case a combination of surveillances may confirm sdequacy and implementation ~of' a complex QA program therefore may, upon evaluation and documentation by a certified lead auditor, preclude the need for audit. In the most nega-21 Jeec. .tive case, the evaluation vill identify to the lead auditor desa further 11 audit activity should be concentrated. 1 17.2.18.1 Incernal Audits h e'SCE&G QA Program requires vendors and contractors of safety-related materials, equipment, and services to conduct audits, as neede.d, to determine the effectiveness of their (i'A Programs. D e internal audit programs must describe the following: 17.2-49 M AMENDMENT S

hwe,

s L

e e SROUP MANAGER m WUCLEAR SERYlCES NUCLEAR SAFETT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMSERS MSR. V.C. SUMMER NUCLE AR STATION I SsOUP MeR. NUCLEAR SERYlCES M A PMGE R NUCLEAR MANAGER OTHERS FU(L MANAGEMENT QUALITT ASSURANCE I MANAGER NUCLEAR l 00ALITY CONTROL DIRECTOR DIRECTOR PROCUREMENT CO MPL I ANCE l SYSTEMS S YS T E M S DIRECTOR NUCLEAR l l OC SYSTEMS STAFF a STAFF a l AS NEEDED) 0.A. AGENTS 0.A.ASENTS FUNCTION AL CONTROL OFF SITE , ON SITE ]- I DIRECTOR DIRECTOR STATION M AN ASER TkT N OUALITY CONTROL NUCLEAR STATION SYSTEMS REYlEW l g SURVEll. LANCE / AUDIT 1 l AND COMMUNICATION ADMINISTRATIVE a SITE STAFF l SCHEDULAR R l OC STAFF CONTROL l Orr-SITE 0.A. g ASENTS l r___J l I L-----.______ ._,_____.J SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRI'C & G AS CD. M KC.W M R M W W mN 29 AM5NDMENT J u vae./ , 1981. Figure 17.2-1 Sou,th Carolina Electric and Cas Co. Quality Assurance Group Organization and Interfaces J ..}}

ML20040B261

Text

Subject:

Dear Mr. Denton:

Navigation menu

Search