ML20039B510
| ML20039B510 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 12/03/1981 |
| From: | Brunner E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20039B508 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-443-81-12, NUDOCS 8112230171 | |
| Download: ML20039B510 (1) | |
Text
.
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Public Service Company of New Hampshire Docket No. 50-443 Seabrook Unit 1 License No. CPPR-135 As t result of the inspection conducted October 5-November 16,1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980), the following violation was identified:
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V states, in part that:
" Activities affecting quality shall be... accomplished in accordance with...
instructions, procedures, or drawings."
The Seabrook Station PSAR for Units 1 and 2 states, in part, in paragraph 17.1.5 that:
"Each organization is required to perform their respective quality related activities covered by this program in accordance with documented instruction, procedures,'or drawings."
UE&C drawing M805169S, as revised by Engineering Change Authorizations (ECA) 08/1197A and 25/0608A, provides details in sketch SK-5/14/81-AF for the support of the Combustible Gas Control (CGC) instrument tubing at 36 support points inside the Unit 1 containment dome area.
UE&C Sketch, SK-5/14/81-AF, illustrates the use of one standard stock pipe clamp with two each SA-325,
" diameter bolts per tubing support.
Contrary to the above, as of October 14,1981, over thirty of the referenced CGC tubing supports had been erected and accepted by QC inspection with bolts ether than the high-strength SA-325 type installed in each pipe clamp.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement II).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Public Service Company of New Hampshire is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affimation. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending your response time.
The responses directed by this Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
DEC 03 1!B1 d
Dated Eldo/i J. Brunner, Chief, Projects Brafch #1, Division of Resident 8
aid Project Inspection cnofong PDR