ML20035H201
| ML20035H201 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Farley  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1992 |
| From: | Woodard J SOUTHERN NUCLEAR OPERATING CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9305030307 | |
| Download: ML20035H201 (74) | |
Text
-
Seutnern Nxlear CWrat.ng Comoany Por.t Othee Box 1295 Birtmnpham A!abama 35201 Teirvone 205 600 SDDG k
n Southem Nudear Operating Company r;;[
ne southern electuc system April 21,1993 Docket Nos. 50-348 50-364 OC9419 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C 20555 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant Annual Environmental Operatino Report - Radiolooical Gentlemen:
The attached " Annual Environmental Operating Report, Part B: Radiological" for calendar year 1992, is transmitted in accordance with the Joseph M.
Farley Nuclear Plant Unit I and Unit 2 Technical Specifications Section 6.9.1.6.
If you have any questions, please advise.
Respectfully submitted, h
N. $. Woodard J
/WHO: sis ENV-93-147 Enclosures
- 1. Annual Environmental Operating Report - Radiological cc: See Next Page.
030014
/I 9305030307 921231 PDR ADOCK 05000348
[
'k R
pDR k
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page Two cc: Southern Nuclear Operatino Company R. D. Hill, Plant Manager U. S. Nuclear Reaulatory Commission. Washincton D. C.
G. F. Wunder, Licensing Project Manager U. S. Nuclear Reculatory Commission. Reaion 11 S. D. Ebneter, Regional Manager G. F. Maxwell, Senior Resident Inspector State of Alabama Director, Division of Radiation Control k
f t
l
'f
- j ALABAMA POWER COMPANY
{
\\.
i ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT l
b PART Br RADIOLOGICAL I
I JOSEPH H. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT NO. 1 i
LICENSE NO. NPF-2
'I f
AND i
UNIT NO. 2 5
-i LICENSE NO. NPF-8 PERIOD EhTING DECEMBER 31, 1992 t
t l
i I
.]
-l
.1.
I l
l i
l i.
l
-E!W Annual Report /2 1:
I F-.
.J i
e
.)
i a
l I
I ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT PART B RADIOLOGICAL
?
TABLE OF CONTENTS l
Section Title Pace Introduction 1
i II Radiological Sampling and Analysis 2
j III Results and Discussion 6
I IV Land Use census and Interlaboratory comparison
-10 Program V
Data Trends and Conclusions 11 i
j s
t i
i l
1 ENV Annual Report /2'
.l
i_
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT LIST OF FIGURES Fiaure Title 1
Indicator. Sampling Locations for Airborne / Direct Environmental Radioactivity at the Farley Nuclear' Plant 2
Community (Indicator II) Sampling Locations for Direct Radiation in the Farley Nuclear Plant Area 3
Control Sampling Locations for Airborne / Direct
. Environmental Radioactivity in the Farley Nuclear Plant Area 4
Indicator and Control Sampling Locations for Waterborne Environmental Radioactivity in the Farley Nuclear Plant Area 11 ENV Annual Report /2
w RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT LIST OF TABLES Table Title 1
Outline of Operational Radiological Environmental-Monitoring Program for Farley Nuclear Plant During 1992 2
Required Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample' Analysis for Farley Nuclear Plant 3
Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations' in Environmental Samples 4
Environmental Monitoring Program Deviations 1992-1992-1 Airborne Particulates - Operational Radioactivity Summary 1992-2 Airborne:
Iodine - Operational Radioactivity Summary 1992-3 External Radiation - Operational Radioactivity Summary 1992-4 Milk - Operational Radioactivity Summary 1992-5 "egetation: Forage - Operational Radioactivity Summary 1992-6 Soil - Operational Radioactivity Summary 1992-7 Waterborne: Surface Water - Operational Radioactivity Summary 1992-8 Waterborne Ground Water - Operational Radioactivity Summary 1992-9 Sediment: River - Operational Radioactivity Summary 1992-10 Fish: River (Game) - Operational Radioactivity Summary 1992-11 Fish: River (Bottom Feeding) - Operational Radioactivity Summary lii ENV. Annual Report /2
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT
(
o LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment Subieet I
1 Joseph M.
Farley Nuclear Plant, Land Use Census, June 5, 1992 t
-t 2
Plots of Selected Environmental Data l
L l-l l
i I
1 i
i
-i
)
I a
iv ENV Annual Report /2 l
i L
OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM JOSEPH H.
FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT I
j UNITS 1 AND 2 I.
Iptroduction The Joseph M.
Farley Nuclear Plant, owned by Alabama Power Company i
(APCo) and operated by Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC),
I located in Houston County, Alabama is approximately fifteen miles east of Dothan, Alabama on the west bank of the Chattahoochee River.
Unit 1, a Westinghouse Electric Corporation Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) with a rated power output of 860 megawatts electrical (MWe) achieved initial criticality on August 9, 1977.
The unit was declared " commercial" on December 1, 1977.
Unit No.
2, also a 860 MWe Westinghouse PWR, achieved initial criticality on May 8, 1981 and was declared " commercial" on July 30, 1981.
Unit II was shutdown for its eighth refueling outage from March 6, 1992, through May 12, 1992.
Unit I was shutdown for its eleventh l
refueling outage from September 25, 1992 through December 2, 1992.
l The Farley Nuclear Plant Environmental Monitoring Program is designed to detect the effects, if any, of plant operation on environmental radiation levels. The sample collection and analysis schedule was implemented in 1977, and modified on July 1, 1980, by adding 14 TLD stations. The program was further modified in April 1982, by Amendment No. 26 to the Unit I Technical Specifications.
l The program was changed a third time in 1989, with the addition of l
two more control TLDs and has continued through 1992 without further change.
Indicator sampling stations are located, where practical, at locations where detection of the radiological effects of the plant's operation is thought to be most likely, where the samples collected should provide a significant indication of potential dose to man, and where an adequate comparison of predicted radiological levels might be made with measured levels.
The control stations are placed at locations where radiological levels are not expected to be significantly influenced by plant operation, i.e.,
at background locations. For some airborne radioactivity samples, community stations are located at the principal population centers between the indicator and the control stations (3-8 miles). Community stations could be used, if desired, as additional control stations, and alternatively, as indicator stations for the nearest population centers in the event of a major airborne release from the plant.
l I
l 1
II.
Radiological Saeolino and Analysis To assess the environmental impact of plant operation, the Farley Nuclear Plant Environmental Monitoring Program monitors airborne, waterborne, ingestion and direct radiation pathways in the area surrounding the plant site.
Table 1 details the sample types, collection and analysis frequency and locations of indicator, community and control stations. For each sample type and location, one sample was collected and analyzed to meet Technical Specification requirements for Units I and II.
While no longer required by Technical Specifications, ID situ soil monitoring was continued in 1992.
The samples were collected by Southern Nuclear's technical staff except for the in situ soil measurements, which were collected by staff members of the University of Georgia (UGA), Center for Applied Isotope Studies. All sample analyses were contracted to UGA, except TLD's, which are read at the plant. The minimum detectable concentration (MDC), specified for the various samples and their respective analyses are given in Table 2.
The reporting levels for radioactivity concentrations in environmental samples are provided in Table 3.
Sampling and analysis deviations during 1992 are listed in Table 4.
To identify the locations of environmental monitoring stations, the area surrounding Farley Nuclear Plant is divided into sixteen radial sectors whose common origin is the point midway between the Unit I and Unit II plant vent stacks. This point is defined as "the plant site".
Each sector of the resulting circle is numbered sequentially clockwise and the circle is oriented so that the centerline of sector 16 is due north. Each sampling point is identified by a four digit number. The first two digits indicate the sector number, and the last two digits indicate the distance, to the nearest mile, from the origin. For example, TLD station 0304 is located 4 miles east northeast of the plant site.
Fish and sediment sample points are identified by their " river mile" location. The Jim Woodruf f Dam near Chattahochee, Florida is designated as river mile zero, and the miles are numbered sequentially northward along the navigable portion of the river to Columbus, Georgia. River mile 41 is approximately three miles downstream of the plant site, and river mile 47 is approximately three milee upstream.
2
i A.
Airborne Particulates and Iodine At the beginning of the year, the airborne particulate and iodine monitoring stations shown in Figures 1 and 3 were equipped with j
Roots vacuum pumps which operated continuously at a flow rate of i
approximately 0.04 m'/ min (1. 5 f t'/ min).
The particulates were collected on Gelman Metricel 5 micron filters.
In series with, but downstream of the particulate filters, 50 millimeter F&J activated charcoal cartridges (or equivalent) were used for collection of iodine.
The Roots system has the sample collector mounted outside of the cabinet horizontally to the ground with a
+
Singer gas meter measuring the cumulative air flow.
The gas meters were calibrated against a certified flow meter.
In May 1992, the Roots systems were replaced by FN-210B air j
samplers manufactured by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC).
Each air sampler is a modular unit consisting of a sample pump, regulator valve assembly, a microprocessor based air volume totalizer, an open faced combination filter holder and i
a thermostatically controlled exhaust fan, all mounted in a l
ventilated aluminum weather house.
The five micron Gelman I
particulate filter and the 50 millimeter F&J activated charcoal cartridge (or equivalent) are installed in separate compartments of the combination filter holder, which is mounted vertically on the pump suction. Sampled air flows vertically from top to bottom, first through the particulate filter, then through the charcoal cartridge. To compensate for dust buildup on the sample filters, the regulator valve assembly, located downstream of the combination filter holder, maintains a constant sample flowrate over a wide range of pressure differentials across the filters.
i The design of the filter holder allows more uniform distribution of sampled airborne particulates over the entire filter disk than i
was possible with the Roots system, where the filters were mounted horizontally, and the particulate filter was placed directly on the charcoal cartridge casing. The totalizers are calibrated using the SAIC Model C-812 calibrator.
1 Particulate filters and charcoal cartridges were collected weekly and sent to UGA for radioactivity analysis. Gross beta 7
radioactivity measurements were performed on each air particulate filter using a Tennelee low background alpha-beta counting system.
i The filters from each station, composited at the end of each quarter, were analyzed for gamma emitters using a fifteen percent I
relative efficiency low background germanium lithium (Ge(Li))
detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based multichannel analyzer (MCA).
All air monitoring station locations shown in Figures 1 and 3 have the capability of monitoring airborne iodine. Weekly routine samples were analyzed for I-131 by UGA using a Canberra 1024 channel MCA and two 1" x 3" NaI detectors and matched i
photomultiplier tubes.
3
s B.
External Radiation f
For the continuous measurement of environmental gamma radiation, natural Lithium Fluoride (LiF) (TLD-700) chips, manufactured by Harshaw-Filtrol Chemical Company, were used.
TLD packets, each l
containing fcur annealed LiF chips, were sealed in opaque mylar to produce a packet that was light-tight, weather-proof, and which had a low mass attenuation for radiation (approximately 50mg/end).
On the plant site, all TLD packets were kept in a lead safe with
[
2-inch walls except for those receiving field exposure or those in the process of being exchanged.
At each external radiation monitoring station (shown in Figures 1-3), two TLD packets, one changed and read quarterly and one changed and read annually, were exposed side-by-side on metal stakes at a height of one meter above the ground.
For the computation of the net field doses, a log of all exposure periods
{
was maintained for each TLD packet.
C.
Milk The milk sample location is as indicated on Figure 3.
All milk samples, collected bi-weekly, were analyzed by UGA for I-131 and gamma emitters. As a preservative for shipment, 1 ml of 25 weight percent merthiolate (Thimerosal) solution was added to each one gtllon sample. The I-131 concentration in each sample was I
determined by collection on anion exchange resin, elution with sodium hypochlorite, followed by organic extraction and counting, by beta gamma coincidence, the resultant toluene-iodine solution in a low level liquid scintillation counter.
Stable iodine carrier was added to each sample for determination of the radiochemical yield.
One liter of each sample was placed in a marinelli beaker and j
analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15 percent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li) detector and a Canberra 4096 channel l
computer-based MCA.
I D.
Vegetation:
Forage Monthly, forage was collected from indicator grass plots located near the air monitoring stations at the plant site perimeter in the SSE and N sectors, or alternate plots if needed, and from a control grass plot located near the air monitoring station in Dothan, Alabama. After drying and pulverizing, the samples were analyzed by UGA for gamma emitters using a 15 percent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li) detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based MCA.
4
E.
Soil Annual iD allu gamma-ray spectroscopy measurements were made by UGA using a 10 percent relative efficiency high purity germanium detector and gamma-ray spectroscopy system specially designed for i
field use.
Measurements were taken at the seven indicator j
locations and at the three community and two control (background) locations listed in Table 1.
A 1024 channel Canberra MCA j
interfaced to a Hewlett-Packard 9825A calculator was used for data j
storage and analysis.
F.
Surface (River) Water f
a Samples of water from the Chattahoochee River, upstream and downstream of the plant site at the locations shown in Figure 4 l
were collected on a semi-continuous basis with Instrumentation Specialties Company (ISCO) samplers.
Monthly composites were sent I
to UGA for radioactivity analysis.
Two liter aliquots from each l
monthly composite were placed in trays lined with plastic film and evaporated to dryness at IOO'C.
The residue (on plastic film) was folded to fit a petri-dish and analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15 percent relative efficiency Ge(Li) low background detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based MCA.
At the end of each quarter, for each sampling location, the balance of the three monthly composites were combined to give a i
quarterly composite sample. Approximately 50 ml from each
.i quarterly composite sample was distilled and a 25 ml aliquot taken
[
for tritium analysis using a large volume-(100 ml) Hewlett-Packard 200 low background liquid scintillation counter.
i G.
Ground (Well) Water In the Farley Plant area there are no true indicator sources of f
groundwater. A well which serves Georgia Pacific Paper Company as a source of potable water, located on the east bank of the Chattahoochee River about four miles south-southeast of the plant, was sampled quarterly as an indicator station. A deep well which l
supplies water to the Whatley residence located about 1.2 miles southwest of the plant was sampled quarterly as a control (background) station.
Samples from both were sent to UGA for radioactivity analysis. An aliquot from each sample was taken for tritium analysis. After distillation, 25 ml samples were analyzed i
using a large volume (100 ml) low background liquid scintillation l
counter.
From the remainder of each sample, a two liter aliquot f
was taken and evaporated to dryness at 100*C in a tray lined with
{
plastic film. The residue (on plastic film) was folded to fit a i
petri dish and analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15 pe cent j
relative efficiency Ge(Li) detector and a canberra 4096 channel computer-based MCA.
)
I t
t h
i 5
i i
H.
Fish (River)
Semi-annually, two types of fish, game and bottom feeding, were collected from the Chattahoochee River at the locations shown in Figure 4, and sent to UGA for gamma-ray spectroscopy analysis.
All fish samples sent to UGA consisted of fish fillets that had been split with Alabama Division of Radiation Control. These fish samples were coarsely chopped at UGA and were analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15 percent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li) detector and 4096 channel Canberra computer-based MCA.
I.
sediment (River)
Semi-annually, sediment samples were collected from the Chattahoochee River at the locations shown in Figure 4.
Approximately one kilogram of each sample was sent to UGA where it was dried, mixed, and analyzed for gamma emitters using a 15 percent relative efficiency low background Ge(Li) detector and a Canberra 4096 channel computer-based MCA.
One set of semi-annual l
sediment samples was split with Alabama Division of Radiation control.
f III.
Results and Discussion i
No known atmospheric nuclear tests were conducted during 1992.
{
Plots of Selected Environmental Data, is included as an enhancement to trending.
In general, the mean annual concentrations.
l of frequently identified isotopes were chosen to be plotted.
In cases where many naturally occurring isotopes were identified, those chosen
+
to be plotted were from differing decay chains. Significant uptrends t
in the data were as follows:
(1) Atmospheric Tests, Peoples Republic of China:
[
September 17, 1977 1
March 14, 1978 December 14, 1978 f
October 15, 1980 (2) Chernobyl Disaster, USSR, April 1986 i
t 6
'l
I I
?
A.
Airborne Particulates and Iodines l
?
I Analysis results of airborne particulate filters and charcoal cartridges are shown in Tables 1992-1 and 1992-2, and i, pages 1-4.
The 1992 results, while below pre-operational levels, showed increased particulate Beta activity I'
and increased particulate Beryllium-7 activity.
Investigation revealed that other nuclear facilities in the Southern company
[
System had not observed similar increases in activity and that the increases observed at FNP coincided with installation of j
the new environmental air sampling systems in May.
The l
increased activity levels (approximately 0.008 to 0.022 l
pC1/ cubic meter for Beta) were observed at all sample i
stations. The increase in measured activity at indicator, l
control and community stations were similar. A review of the l
Semi-Annual Effluent Release Reports for 1992 revealed that the plant particulate effluent releases did not correlate with the increases in particulate Beta activity. The same sample j
collection filters were used with both the old and the new i
samplers. Analytical equipment and techniques were also the i
same.
This would indicate that the increases may have been caused by the new air sampling systems. The features of the i
new air samplers which could account for the increase ares 1.
Vertical mounting of the sample filters with sample flow passing from top to bottom, first through the particulate
[
filter and then through the charcoal cartridge.
2.
Incorporation of a flow regulator valve to provide for constant sample flowrate by compensating for increased AP i
across the filters.
(
3.
Housing each filter in a_ separate compartment in a filter holder designed to allow sampled particulate to be more I
evenly distributed over the filter disk.
The conclusion that the increased particulate Beta activity is related to the installation of the new air sampling systems is j
supported by the increases in activity levels of Beryllium-7, a naturally occurring isotope measured on the same filters, and a slight increase in the Iodine 131 MDC observed following installation of the new monitors.
Cesium 134 and Cesium 137 i
were not detected.
Since the annual mean Iodine 131 MDC was less than in 1991, the slight increase in Iodine 131 MDC is
}
not considered significant.
.i Deviations from the Environmental Monitoring Program resulting l
from airborne particulate and iodine analysis are given in l
Table 4.
l i
f
)
i
')
i i
7
I l
i l
L f
B.
External Radiation The results of the external radiation measurements are shown in Table 1992-3 and Attachment 2 page 5.
The 1992 results are at or below pre-operational levels and consistent with previous years.
There are no significant differences in indicator, community and control measurements.
Deviations from the Environmental Monitoring Program resulting l
from external radiation measurements are given in Table 4.
c.
Milk i
The milk analysis results are shown in Table 1992-4 and
[, pages 6-8.
Lewis Dairy was used as the control i
location. There were no indicator samples during 1992.
The 1992 results are consisteat with those of previous years, and
[
Fotassium-40 was the only isotope detected in milk samples.
No deviations from the Environmental Monitoring Program l
resulted from milk sample analysis.
i D.
Vegetation i
Forage analysis results are shown in Table 1992-5 and i, pages 9-12.
The 1992 results are below l
pre-operational levels and consistent with the downward trends l
of recent years with the following exceptions. The October i
1992 sample contained 43 pci/kg cesium 137 activity. This value is below pre-operational levels and is not considered f
significant since cesium 137 has been shown to be present in the soil throughout the area.
No deviations from the Environmental Monitoring Program resulted from forage sample analysis.
E.
Soil i
The in eitu soil analysis results are shown in Table 1992-6 and in Attachment 2, pages 13 and 14.
The only man-made isotope found was cesium 137 which has been present since the pre-operational period. Although the mean control cesium 137 activity was greater than in 1991, cesium 137 measurements for 1992 continue the downward trend of recent years.
[
f i
f
[
J I
8 l
2
}
1 F.
Waterborne (Surface Water) l 1
The surface water analysis results are shown in Table 1992-7 and in Attachment 2, pages 15-17.
The mean indicator tritium l
activity was greater than the 1991 value and pre-operational levels.
The activity, measured during the second, third and fourth quarters, peaked in the third quarter. The fourth quarter result was below pre-operational levels. The j
increased activity was due to increased levels of tritium in i
plant effluents based on a review of the Semi-Annual Effluent Reports for 1992.
In addition, low river flow rates were l
observed during dry weather months.
The background activity, measured in the first quarter only, was below pre-operational levels. No measurable activity from other man-made isotopes was detected in control samples.
No deviations from the Environmental Monitoring Program resulted from surface water analysis.
G.
Waterborne (Ground Water)
I The ground water analysis results are shown in Table 1992-8 and in Attachment 2, pages 18-20.
No measurable activity from man-made isotopes was detected in ground water samples in 1992.
No deviations from the Environmental Monitoring Program resulted from ground water analysis.
H.
River Sedimen' The river sediment analysis results are shown in Table 1992-9, and in Attachment 2, pages 21-24.
Along with activity from a variety of naturally _ occurring isotopes, Cesium 134 activity was measured in the fall control and indicator samples.
Activity from cesium 134 has been detected sporadically in previous control samples but this is the first time it was detected in the indicator sample. Review of past Semi-Annual Effluent Reports revealed that Cesium 134 activity in 1992 plant effluents was less than in 1991 and consistent with established trends.
This will be monitored for future trends.
No deviations from the Environmental Monitoring Program resulted from river sediment analysis.
l f
{
~l 9
i f
r I.
Game Fish (River)
The analysis results of edible portions of Chattahoochee River game fish are shown in Table 1992-10 and in Attachment 2, page 25.
Cesium 137 activity was detected in the spring and fall indicator samples and in the fall control sample. Detected activity was below pre-operational levels and consistent with established trends.
No deviations from the Environmental Monitoring Program resulted from game fish analysis.
J.
Bottom-Feeding Fish (River)
Analysis results of edible portions of Chattahoochee River bottomfeeding fish are shown in Table 1992-11 and in, page 26.
No measurable activity from man-made isotopes was detected in control or indicator samples, and MDC values are less than those for the pre-operational period.
No deviations from the Environmental Monitoring Program resulted from bottom feeding fish analysis.
IV.
Land Use census and Interlaboratory comparison Procram A.
Land Use Census and Milk Animal Survey The Land Use Census and Milk Animal Survey was completed on June 5, 1992.
The results are given in Attachment I.
The Milk Animal Survey reported that the owner of goats located 5.1 miles south of FNP could not be contacted.
In July 1992, the owner was contacted and stated that the goats were not being milked. The animals were subsequently removed.
No deviations from the Environmental Monitoring Program occurred as a result of the Land Use Census and Milk Animal
- Survey, B.
Interlaboratory Comparison Program During 1992, the University of Georgia Center for Applied Isotope Studies (UGA) was a participant in the EPA Crosscheck Program. The UGA EPA Program code designation is EA.
I r
10
i i
V.
Data Trends and conclusion Review of data trends from the pre-operational period through 1992
}
indicates that environmental radiation levels measured in all the pathways monitored in 1992 remained at background levels and were at or below pre-operational levels, except river water tritium and river sediment Cesium 134.
The atmospheric weapons tests conducted.
p by the People's Republic of China in October 1980, and the Chernobyl disaster in April 1986, produced measurable increases in
[
background radiation, but the effects dissipated within two to
[
three years following each event. The general downward trend in j
environmental radiation levels observed since 1986 continued in i
1992. Therefore, data obtained during 1992 demonstrated that continued operation of Farley Nuclear Plant has not harmed or
[
caused any irreversible damage to the environment.
t f
l 1
p t
a t
I t
i t
I I
i r
s I
l 11
_ =_
i L
ll l
'-_S g 22 i
3 16
]f
]
n 7175 WAKE SPLIT-NORMAL %
33 h"E,
K/Q = 1.0.10 4
- y'. ];
t.
x k
i 12-13
- conting, 3
g lown ist Umt 2 ENE WNW }
I
[-
Plant unt stacts 8 vb n$.
E
~
I W
' y,,
- ((,8,,, 3 A8'd*1 8" l
vll":::'.gM
/!=~
- ESE tatak, structm I
/
l
'i W5W l
\\
. l........'
L s. ;.,; -
i, ~. - 3.. st y
st
'z seaw.
5 A
ssW ssE 1
s
/
I i
s fu q
i A
g_
l
+ meAct sAMetinc A TLD SAMPLING l
@ TLD, PARTICULATES & 10 DINE SAMPLlhG i
i INDICATOR SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR AIRBORhT/ DIRECT ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY AT TIIE FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT l
FIGURE 1
M 4-rJ hJ i
/
15
/
3 i"*
nwt 14 2
hw NE j
s2 cotuusia
[
HILTON 13 12 3
WNW y a tig l
u
<n
\\/
4 n.
m v..near gi a
1 77
.mu,,d.
,,7 4-CtDAR 213 i
11-ASNFDR 1
[SE hs a
g 09 T
co,oo.,
84 10
$E JAKIN
?_
9 7
h SSW
$$E s
s s
A TLD SAMPUNG
$ CAM IN #125 COMMUNITY (INDICATOR II) SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR DIRECT RADIATION IN THE FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AREA.
FIGURE 2
I i
i
~
??
?
r w._
se
\\
g y
- ni
.. u..
- <e, lnll
/
~g
-e
]
ON, E
i
~a
[
i
/M\\!
(
f
,{
-y i
E
~=
s
- N,' I ~ ' M
[
f 2
ri
' o.1 TT v\\
l
/m[$
i
.j
/
l
. M
-i J
, N
.a 7 2
-5 j
y 3
J',g c.
i g 7
I 3,.
g,'
e.
- =-
/.
~
l 6
=t cf E
a 0,
6 es 4
=
I J
!!h
~
NLQ1
"* 'w
/
..Q...
r s!!!!
- g; N
1 s
Ehib?}
h s y;i" i
i CONTROL SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR AIRBORNE / DIRECT ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY IN TIIE FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AREA FIGURE 3 i
F I
i i
/
k COLUMBIA
%L 52
+
l t
52 ANDREWS LOCK & DAM
\\
fARLEY ID MILES
/
hAR MNT
~~
l 6
EARL 1 Nn g
t9 ASHFORD S
l 12 e
+
HOUSTON COUNTY ALABAMA N
l INDICATOR STATIONS CONTROL STATIONS E SURFACE AND GROUND WATER h SURTACE WATER, FISH AND SEDIMENT x nSu ANo StomN1
@cRoVNoWATa INDICATOR AND CONTROL SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR WATERBORNE ENVIRONMENTAL RADI0 ACTIVITY IN THE FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT AREA FIGURE 4
TABLE l-OUTLINE OF OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM FOR FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT DURING 1992 Types of Samples and Sampling Type and Frequency
' Sampling Locations and of (Distances Given in Miles)
Collection Frequency Analysis AIRBORNE Particulates continuous operation of sampler with Particulate sampler sample collection being performed once per 7 days.
Analyze for gross beta radioactivity 2 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Indicator Stations following filter change.
Perform gamma isotopic North Perimeter (N-0.8) analysis on each sample South Perimeter (SSE-1.0) when gross beta activity Plant Entrance (WSW-0.9) is >10 times the yearly River Intake Structure (ESE-0.8) mean of control samples.
Perform gamma isotopic analysis on composite Community Stations:
(by location) sample at least once per 92 days.
Columbia, AL. (N-5)
Georgia Pacific Paper Co. (SSE-3)
Ashford, AL. (WSW-8)
Control Stations:
Blakely, GA. (NE-15)
Dothan, AL. (W-18)'
Neals Landing, FL. (SSE-18)
Iodine Continuous sampler operation Radioiodine can19ter with charcoal canister Indicator Stations:
collection performed once Analyze at least once per 7 days.
per 7 days for I-131.
North Perimeter (N-0.8)
South Perimeter (SSE-1.0)
Plant Entrance.- (WSW-0.9)
River Intake Structure (ESE-0.8)
Table 1 ENV/1 Page 1 of 5
TABLE l'(con'd).
Types of samples and Sampling Type and Frequency Sampling Locations and of (Distances Given in Miles)
Collection Frequency Analysis Community Stations:
Georgia Pacific Paper Co. (SSE-3)
Control Stations:
Blakely, GA.-(NE-15)
Dothan, AL. (W-18)
Neals Landing, FL. (SSE-18)
Soil Annual 1D situ Ge(Ll) gamma-ray Gamma Isotopic spectroscopy measurements.
Indicator Stations:
Annually Seven Stations along the plant perimeter (NE-1.0, E-0.8, SSE-1.0, SSW-1.0, WSW-0.9, NNW-0.8 and N-0.8)
Community Stations:
Columbia, AL. (N-5)
Georgia Pacific.. Paper Co.(SSE-3)
Ashford, AL. (WSW-8)
Control Stations:
3 Blakely, GA. (NE-15)
Dothan, AL. (W-18).
DIRECT RADIATION At least once per 92 days Gamma dose Readout at least once per 92 days c
Table 1 Page 2 of 5 o.;...__,_..
...._...u-_.-,--_-.,_,
_ _._ a, _ -,._,. _ _ __ _
.. ~ -..
.._.._.u_.,,
..__a....-_,.-.._-_.__,_..-_....___
TABLE 1 (con'd)
Types of Samples and Sampling Type and Frequency Sampling Locations and of (Distances Given in Miles)
Collection Frequency Analysis Indicator I Stations:
Sixteen stations, one in each meteorological sector along the plant perimeter (N-0.8, NNE-0.9, NE-1.0, ENE-0.9, E-0.8, ESE-0.8, SE-1.1, SSE-1.0, S-1.0, SSW-1.0, SW-0.9, WSW-0.9, W-0.8, WNW-0.8, NW-1.1, and NNW-0.9).
Indicator II (Community) Stations:
Eighteen stations: At least one in each meteorological sector at a distanca of 1.2-8 miles (NNE-4, NE-4, ENE-4, E-5, ESE-5, SE-5, SSE-3, S-5, SSW-4, SW-1.2, SW-5, WSW-4, WSW-8, W-4, WNW-4, NW-4, NNW-4, and N-5).
Control Stations:
Blakely, GA. (NE-15)
Neals Landing, FL. (SSE-18)
Dothan, AL. (W-18)
Dothan, AL. (W-15)
Webb, AL. (WNW-ll)
Haleburg, AL.
(N-12)
WATERBORNE Surface Water Composite taken with propor-Monthly gamma isotopic tional semi-continuous sampler, analysis of each composite Indicator Station:
having a minimum sampling fre-sample. Tritium analysis quency not exceeding two hours of each composite sample collected over a period s 31 days.
at least once per 92 days.
Georgia Pacific'. Paper Co.,
(3 miles downstream of plant discharge, River Mile-40)
Table 1 Page 3 of 5
_,._x
,w,
, - +,, _,.. _ - _...,,.
,p.
.-.-.-----u-..-.-
. n
TABLE 1 (con'd)
Types of Samples and Sampling Type and Frequency Sampling Locations and of' (Distances Given in Miles)
Collection Frequency Analysis Control Station:
Upstream of Andrews Lock and Dam
(=3 miles upstream of plant intake, River M11e-47)
Ground Water Grab sample taken at least Gamma isotopic and tritium once per 92 days.
analyses of each sample Indicator Stations once per quarter.
Georgia Pacific Paper Co., Well (SSE-4)
Control Station:
Whatley Residence, Well (SW-1.2)
River Sediment Grab sample taken at least Gamma isotopic analysis once per 184 days.
of each sample twice per year.
Indicator Station:
Downstream of plant discharge at Smith's Bend (River Mile - 41)
Control-Station:
Upstream of plant discharge
.at.Andrews Lock & Dam Reservoir (River. Mile - 47)
Table 1 Page 4 of 5 v r w w ve r-++m-wwwwte.-w w - w ww e ww+we-+wmw--
wa-e-*w--
==,-evemm
- w
'our==*w=*-wrva--.
w
-,avw-*re,ew
'w-we,
---+--**'er+ew-g-
+v-'-r t' w-v re-w-w"t
, eve - v ev w v -t-w ww
--e'.-wv-,---
- ve
+-+r-w e = w*rwr--
-w-er w wo
-- wsv.we -
TABLE 1 (con'd)
Types'of samples and Sampling Type and Frequency Sampling Locations and of
{ Distances Given in Miles)
Collection Frequency Analysis INGESTION Milk Control Staton:
Lewis Dairy At least once per 16 days Gamma isotopic and I-131 Avon, AL. (WSW-14) analysis of each bi-weekly sample when animals are on pasture.
Fish Indicator Station One sample each of the following Gamma isotopic analysis species at least once per each on edible portions once season (March 15 - May 15 and per season.
September 15 - November 15) 1.
Game Fish 2.
Bottom Feeding Fish Downstream of plant discharge in vicinity of Smith's Bend (River Mile - 41)
Control Stetion Upstream of plant discharge in Andrews Lock & Dam Reservoir-(River Mile - 47)
Forace Grab sample cut from green Gamma isotopic analysis forage at least once per 31 (which includes I-131) days.
of each monthly sample.
Indicator Station:
North Perimeter (N-0.8)
South Perimeter (SSE-1.0)
Control Stations Dothan, AL. (W-18)
Table 1 Page 5 of 5
. ~.
.-~.-.
.~
TABLE 2 REOUIRED DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS f_OR FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT d
VALUES FOR THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE CONCENTRATIONfMDCi Airborne Particulate Water or Gas Fish Milk Food Products Sediment Analysis ipCi/11 i oci/m')
fDCi/ko. weti fDCi/11 iDCi/ka. weti iDCi/ko. drvi Gross beta 4
0.01 NA NA NA NA H-3 2000 NA NA NA NA NA Mn-54 15 NA 130 NA NA NA Fe-59 30 NA 260 NA NA NA Co-58, 60 15 NA 130 NA NA NA Zn-65 30 NA 260 NA NA NA Zr-95 30 NA NA NA NA NA Nb-95 15 NA NA NA NA NA I-131 l'
O.07 NA 1
60 NA Cs-134 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 Ba-140 60 NA' NA 60 NA NA La-140 15 NA NA 15 NA NA Table 2 Page 1 of 2
.-- - ~.-.. -.....~ -
TABLE 2 (con'd) i
- The MDC is the smallest concentration'of radioactive material in a sample that will be detected with 95% probability with 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.
For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):
T MDC =
4.66 Sm E
V 2.22 Y
exp (-lat) i Where:
MDC is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above (as picoeurie per unit mass or volume).
S. is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute).
.I E is the counting efficiency (as counts per transformation).
V is the sample size (in units of mass or volume).
2.22 is the number of transformations per minute per picoeurie.
Y is the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable).
1 is the radioactive decay constant for the particular i
radionuclide.
i At is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the i
sample collection period) and time of counting (for environmental samples, not plant effluent samples).
{
The value of S. used in the calculation of the MDC for a J1tection system shall be based on the actual observed variance of tne background counting rate or of the counting rate of the blank samples (as appropriate) rather than on an unverified theoretically predicted variance.
In calculating the MDC for a radionuclide determined by gamma-ray spectroscopy, the background shall include the typical
[
contributions of other radionuclides normally present in the samples (e.g., Potassium-40 in milk samples). Typical values of E, V,
Y and' j
At shall be used in the calculations.
"The MDC's for Tritium, Gross beta, and Radioiodine were obtained using l
blank background (a priori), whereas, for gamma-ray spectroscopy actual sample backgrounds were used (a posteriori).
[
?E)C for drinking water.
l Table 2 Page 2 of 2 I
r b
I
TABLE 3 REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIPONMENTAL_ SAMPLES Airborne Particulate Water or Gas Fish Milk Food Products Analysis (DC1/11 f DCi/m')
iDCi/ko. wetl fDCi/11 iDCi/ka. wet 1 H-3 2 x 10" NA NA NA NA Mn-54 1 x 10' NA 3 x 10' NA NA 2
Fe-59 4 x 10 NA 1 x.10' NA NA co-58 1 x 10' NA 3 x 10' NA NA 2
Co-60 3 x 10 NA 1 x 10' NA NA 2
Zn-65 3 x 10 NA 2 x 10' NA NA Zr/Nb-95 4 x 102 NA NA NA NA I-131 2 x 10' 9x 10'8 NA 3 x 10' 1x 10 2 Cs-134 3 x 10' 1 x - 10' 1 x 10' 6 x 10' 1 x 10' Cs-137 5 x 10' 2 x 10' 2 x 10' 7 x 10' 2 x 10' NA Ba/La-140 2 x 102 NA NA 3 x 102
'For drinking water samples.
Annual ENV Report /4(7)-
Table 3 Puge 1 of 1 i
,-m_w,--~,y--
..-,,-,-re.w,..
e wr r-,-
==-v
-*me.
-ve---
re w =,w wo - -m, c
en,
,-e-w w-v-
m-w w
-v-+v
--=w-<im en
-r naar
+*.e-we-=-------w+w'-
w-+--
-*e--,e--
-we- - - - =vs w e-
- e
-,-we=
TABLE 4 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PRGGRAM DEVIATIONS 1992 DATE/ TIME COMPONENT CAUSE OF DEVIATION RESOLUTION REMARKS 2-18-92/0932 Air Monitor 1101 Blown fuse.
Replaced fuse.
Monitor out of service for approximately 163 hours0.00189 days <br />0.0453 hours <br />2.695106e-4 weeks <br />6.20215e-5 months <br />; Insufficient sample volume to meet Technical Specification (TS) particulate gross beta and Iodine 131 MDC limits.
2-18-92/1340 Air Monitor 1218 Mechnical failure.
Work request Monitor out of service for submitted.
Monitor approximately 56 hours6.481481e-4 days <br />0.0156 hours <br />9.259259e-5 weeks <br />2.1308e-5 months <br />.
repaired 2-20-92.
2-25-92/0839 Air Monitor 0701 Blovn fuse.
Replaced fuse.
Monitor out of service for approximately 161 hours0.00186 days <br />0.0447 hours <br />2.662037e-4 weeks <br />6.12605e-5 months <br />.
Insufficient sample volume to meet TS particulate gross beta and Iodine 131 MDC limits.
2-25-92/0900 Air Monitor 1101 Electrical failure.
Work request Monitor out of service for submitted.
Pump and approximately 144 hours0.00167 days <br />0.04 hours <br />2.380952e-4 weeks <br />5.4792e-5 months <br />.
electrical Insufficient sample volume to receptacle replaced meet TS Iodine 131 MDC limit.
3-2-93.
3-10-92/0857 Air Monitor 1101 Blown fuse.
Replaced fuse.
Monitor out of service for approximately 96 hours0.00111 days <br />0.0267 hours <br />1.587302e-4 weeks <br />3.6528e-5 months <br />.
Insufficient sample volume to meet TS Iodine 131 MDC limit.
3-10-92/0930 Air Monitor 0701 Loss of electrical Work request Monitor out of service for power.
submitted.
Power approximately 153 hours0.00177 days <br />0.0425 hours <br />2.529762e-4 weeks <br />5.82165e-5 months <br />.
restored 3-12-92.
Insufficient sample volume to meet TS Iodine 131 MDC limit.
3-17-92/1057 Air Monitor 0215 Mechanical failure.
Work request Monitor out of service submitted.
Pump approximately 196 hours0.00227 days <br />0.0544 hours <br />3.240741e-4 weeks <br />7.4578e-5 months <br />.
replaced 3-20-93.
Insufficient sample volume to meet TS Iodine 131 MDC limit.
3-17-92/1254 Air Monitor 1218 Sample volume 216 Adjusted sample Insufficient sample volume to cubic meters due to flowrate.
low sample flowrate.
3-31-92/1635 TLD Stake 0304 First quarter and Replaced annual No first quarter TLD readings annual TLD's TLD's on 4-1-92.
for this station.
destroyed by vandals.
Page 1 of 3
~
.. - - ~.....
TABLE 4-.
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORI2G PRGURAM DEVIATIONS 1992 DATE/ TIME COMPONENT.
CAUSE OF DEVIATION RESOLUTION REMARKS 3-31-92/1635 TLD Stake 0405 First quarter and Replaced Annual No first quarter TLD readings annual TLD's TLD's on 4-1-92.
for this station.
destroyed by vandals.
5-12-92/1635 Air Monitor 1218 Mechanical failure Work request Monitor out of service for following routine submitted. New air approximately 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />.
filter changeout.
monitor (FN-2108) installed 5-15-92.
6-9-92/1400 Air Monitor.1218 Circuit breaker Reset circuit Monitor out of service for tripped.
breaker.
Submitted approximately 88 hours0.00102 days <br />0.0244 hours <br />1.455026e-4 weeks <br />3.3484e-5 months <br />, work request to investigate history of electrical failures at this site.
6-26-92/1530 TLD Stake 1215 second quarter TLD Installed third No second quarter TLD readings packet knocked off quarter TLD packet.
for this station.
stake and destroyed by lawn mower.
6-26-92/1530 TLD Stake 0304 second quarter TLD Used annual TLD Installed new annual TLD to packet destroyed by packet (installed replace the one which was read vandals.
4-1-92) for second for the second quarter.
quarter dose assessment.
7-14-92/1010
~ Air Monitor 0718 Circuit breaker Reset circui*,
Monitor out of service for tripped.
breaker.
approximately 139 hours0.00161 days <br />0.0386 hours <br />2.29828e-4 weeks <br />5.28895e-5 months <br />.
Insufficient sample volume to meet TS Iodine 131 MDC limit.
9-1-92/1600 Air Monitor 1601 Loss of power due to Power restored on Monitor out of service for lightning striking 8-28-92.
approximately 20 hours2.314815e-4 days <br />0.00556 hours <br />3.306878e-5 weeks <br />7.61e-6 months <br />.
power pole on 8 92.
10-20-92/0935 Air Monitor 1218 Circuit breaker Reset circuit Monitor out of service for tripped.
breaker.
approximately 26 hours3.009259e-4 days <br />0.00722 hours <br />4.298942e-5 weeks <br />9.893e-6 months <br />.
11-11-92/1100 Air Monitor 1101 Loss of power caused Power restored Tagout initiated 11-9-92/0635, by tagout of ID 4160 11-12-92.
completed-11-11-92/0739.
volt bus.
Limiting Condition of Operation (LCO) declared. Monitor out of service for - 42 hrs.
Page 2 of 3
. -.. - ~ -. -..
TABZ.E 4 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM DEVIAT2ONS 1992
.DATE/ TIME'
. COMPONENT CAUSE OF DEVIATION -
RESOLUTION REMARKS' 11-11-92/1100 Air Monitor 0701 Loss of power caused Power restored Tagout initiated 1.1-9 92/0639, by tagout of ID 4160 11-12-92.
completed 11-11-92/073.1 LCO volt bus, declared.
Monitor out of service for approximately 42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br />.
13-15-92/0902 Air Monitor 1108 Power to monitor Power restored isolated from 12 12-15-92.
No sample for 12-8-92 to 12 92/1453 to 12 92 sample period. Monitor out 92/0902 due.to of service for approximately 222 renovation of hours.
Ashford. AL substation by Alabama Power Co.
Southeast Division.
Page 3 of 3
....a w
FNP-0-STP-799 RTYPE G8.05 ATTACHMENT 1 JOSEPH M.
FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LAND USE CENSUS JUNE 5, 1992 f
I.
PURPOSE As required by FNP Technical Specifications 3.12.2 and 4.12.2, the annual land use census was completed on June 5, 1992. The purpose of the census was:
i
..t A.
To identify, within a five mile radius of FNP, the location of the resident nearest the plant site in each sector. As used in the Land Use Census report, the terms "FNP" and " plant site" are interchangeable, and are defined as the point midway between the Unit One and Unit Two plant vent stacks.
B.
To identify within a five mile radius of FNP, the number and location of milk animals in each sector. As used in the Land Use Census report, the term " milk animal" is defined as a cow or goat I
whose milk is obtained for human consumption.
l P
r C.
To determine, using results obtained in parts A and B above, if changes to the Offsite Dose calculation Manual (ODCM) and/or the l
milk sampling program are necessary.
II.
METHOD r
Using topographic maps obtained from the U.
S. Geological Survey
~
(USGS) and highway maps obtained from the Alabama Highway Department and the Georgia Department of Transportation, field surveys were conducted in each sector out to five miles from the plant site.
Information gained from residents interviewed during the surveys was used to establish or confirm the location of the resident nearest the plant site in each sector, and to determine whether milk animals were present in any sector within five miles of the plant site.
The Houston County, Alabama, livestock agent and the Early County, Georgia, extension agent were contacted for assistance in locating commercial dairy farms or privately owned milk animals within five miles of the plant site.
The results of the surveys are shown in Table 1.
III.
NEAREST RESIDENT LOCATIONS The location of the resident nearest the plant site in'each sector is plotted on a USGS topographic map maintained by the environmental staff. The 1992 surveys revealed two changes from the 1991 surveys.
The occupied residences identified.in the 1991 surveys as those i
nearest the plant site in sectors five and fifteen were found to be abandoned in 1992. New locations were identified and plotted on the map.
As shown in Table 1, both locations are farther from the plant site than the previously identified locations.
ENV/1 Page 1 of 4
^
FNP-0-STP-799 RTYPE G8.05 IV.
MILK ANIMAL SURVEY Mr. Mickey Fourakers, Early County, Georgia, Extension Agent stated that there are no commercial dairy farms in Early County, and that he knew of no privately owned milk animals within five miles of the plant site.
Field surveys conducted along Georgia Highways 62, 370, 273 and 363, and Early County Roads 26, 103, 28, 270, 81 and 248 produced no evidence of milk animals.
Mr. Ricky Hudson, Houston County, Alabama Livestock Agent, provided,a list of commercial dairy farms in Houston County, and stated that he knew of no privately owned milk animals within five miles of the plant site.
Field surveys conducted along Alabama highways 52 and 95, and Houston County, Roads 75, 33, 42 and interconnecting secondary roads produced no evidence of milk animals.
There are three commercial dairy farms, all more than 5 miles from the plant site, in the vicinity of FNP:
Ray Lewis Dairy Rt. 1 Ashford, AL 14 miles west southwest of the plant site; Ray Lewis, owner Green Valley Farms Webb, AL 12 miles west of the plant site; Bruce Ivey, owner Robert Weir and Sons Dairy Seminole County, GA 14 miles south southeast of the plant site; Robert Weir, owner The current milk control sample location is Ray Lewis Dairy.
Since milk animals have not been located within five miles of the plant site, no milk indicator sample is collected.
Although milk animals have not been found within five miles of the plant site, the following items have been noted:
A.
As reported in 1991 and previous surveys, Mr. Thomas Dean of Gordon, Alabama, keeps milk goats for his personal use at his residence six miles south of the plant site.
Mr. Dean was interviewed and the location of his residence and the presence of the goats confirmed.
ENV/1 Page 2 of 4-
FNP-0-STP-799 RTYPE G8.05 B.
A lone Holstein bull was seen in a pasture approximately 1.2 miles west southwest of the plant site.
The occupant of the residence next to the pasture, Mr. Tommy Respress, confirmed that there were no milk animals present.
I C.
A mixed-breed Guernsey cow was observed in a field at the residence of Mrs. Mary Esther Allums in Early County, Georgia, three miles east southeast of the plant site.
Mrs. Allums was interviewed and stated that the cow was not being milked, but is kept by her children as a pet.
D.
A herd of approximately 20 goats was observed in Gordon, Alabama, 5.1 miles south of the plant site.
The goats are confined in a field approximately one acre in size at the intersection of Alabama Highway 95 and Houston County Road 81.
Neighbors 1
identified Mr. William King of Gordon as the owner.
Several l
attempts to contact Mr. King at his home and by telephone were l
unsuccessful. There is no evidence that the goats are bei:.g milked for human consumption.
V.
RESULTS l
r A.
There is no occupied residence in any sector closer to the plant I
site than currently assessed by the ODCM.
B.
In sectors 5 and 15, the distance from the plant site to the nearest occupied residence increased because the old locations were abandoned and new locations were identified.
C.
There are currently no milk animals within five miles of the plant g
site.
VI.
CONCLUSIONS A.
No changes to ODCM are required.
y B.
No change to the milk sampling program is necessary.
r l
l 6
i i
l i
i i
ENV/1 Page 3 of 4
-l
'IABLE 1 OF ATIA01MI2E 1 JOSEPH M. FARLEY IUCLEAR FIRC IA!O USE CD4 SUS NO MILK ANIVAL SGNEY JuE 5,1992 t
. PADIAL Sw1 UHS RESIDDR MILK ANIMAL 22.5 nmREES EACH 1991 1992 1991 1992 REASO4 EUR 0%fGE ItOIVIDUALS IIEESTIENED Ibrth-!brtheast (01) 2.5 2.5
>5
>5 N/A
- Mrs. C. H. Freeman i
Northest (02) 2.4 2.4
>5
>5 IVA
- Mrs. Barbara Kirkpatrick East Northeast (03) 2.4 2.4
>5
>5 IVA
- Mrs. Jim Donaldson East (04) 2.8 2.8
>5
>5 N/A
- Mr. Booker T. Spivey
[
Mr. W. A. Mercer I
East Southeast (05) 2.8 3.0
>5
>5 Note 1
- Mrs. Mary Esther Allums Southeast (06) 3.4 3.4
>5
>5 tyA
- Mrs. Wanda Wilkerson i
Mr. David Smith South Southeast (07) >5
>5
>5
>5 tyA Mr. Robert Weir 1
- Note 3 i
South (08) 4.3 4.3
>5
>5 N/A
- Mrs. Francha Brown Mrs. Daisy Marsh Ms. Sarah 'Ihcznas i
Mrs. Doris Wade i
Mr. 'Ihcrnas Dean South Southwest (09) 2.9 2.9
>5
>5 IVA Ibte 2 i
Southwest (10) 1.2 1.2
>5
>5 tyA
- Mrs. Adair Gilbert i
West Southest (11) 2.4 2.4
>5
>5 N/A Note 2 Mr. Ray Lewis West (12) 1.3 1.3
>5
>5 IVA
- Mr. Ttany Respress 1
West Northwest (13) 2.1 2.1
>5
>5 tyA tbte 2 Nbrthwest (14) 1.5 1.5
>5
>5 N/A
- Mrs. Amarda Ryals Mr. Blake Jernigan Ibrth Ibrthwest (15) 2.0 3.3
>5
>5 tbte 1
- Mrs. 'Ihamas Steelman Mrs. Ruth Nall Mr. Ron Bumpus tbrth (16) 2.6 2.6
>5
>5 tyA
- Mr. 'Ibny Knighton CNearest Resident in Sector Ibte 1: New location. 1991 location abardared.
1 tbte 2: Resident not hcme during survey. Unable to make telephone contact.
l Ibte 3: !b resident within 5 miles in sector 7.
Georgia Pacific Paper Co. (GPPC) located in sector 7, 3.9 miles frm plant site. Air sampler, surface voter sampler, 7tD located an GPPC
-plant site.
j Annual El# Report /19 Page 4 of 4 1)
AIRBORNE: PARTICULATES-OPERATIONAL RADIOACTIVITY
SUMMARY
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE NOS. NPF-2 AND NPI-8 IlOUSTON COUNTY AIAllAMA
SUMMARY
REPORT IROM 10192 TO 123192 im TYPE And All INDICAIOR INDICA 1OR LDCAT ON- _.... _.._.COMMUNilY. -... _ -
... CONTROL TOTAL LOCA110NS WITil iIIGIIEST ANNIiAL MI'AN I OCATIONS LOCATIONS NUMBERS Of wowsAt.
NAME ANALYSIS Mtons MEAN MIN MAX l msTA%ct MEAN MIN MAX M1AN MIN MAX MEAN _ MIN MAX PERIORMED c
o k A.4 mkretio%
e o
e o
e o
BE-7 40 0.011 ODC0 0 014 0 0t6 RIVER IN'I AKE 0 9425 0 02 0.065 0.0513 0.022 0.071 0.04M 0.021 0.071 16 16 0.8 MI. ESE 4
4 12 12 12 12 IlEl A 519 0.002 0.0150 0 001 0 057 SSE PERIM.
0.0163 0.001 0.057 0 0155 0.001 0.08 0.0179 0.001 0.059 208 208 1.0 MI. SSE S2 52 155 155 156
.156 CS-134 43 0 002
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA
<MDC NA NA (MDC NA NA 0
16 0
0 0
12 0
12 CS-137 40 0 002
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA
<MDC NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
16 0
0 0
12 0
12 1131 40 0.002
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA (MDC NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
16 0
0 0
12 0
12 l
1 i
Mean Descrrruned I rurn Mcasuremcrus is uh ikiccsaNc Activuy Ordy.
(A) No Nonroutine Anomalous Mcasurceru rus Ik; cried Ihring Tids Period.
(B) Mean Minimum IWtectable Coru creration Calculaird Per Table 2 of This Ikpun.
(C) Nurrbcr of Mca.surerncrus With Ikscciabic Activity Only.
tD) TotalNurrber of Mcasuremerus Takcrt TABLE 1992-1 Page 1 of 1 l
1 l
AIRBORNE: IODINE. OPERATIONAL RADIOACTIVITY
SUMMARY
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE NOS. NPF-2 AND NPF-8 IIOUSTON COUNTY ALABAMA
SUMMARY
REPORT 170M 10192 TO 123192 (4)
I
- N '!? f '."I "f'?
CONTROL.
TYl'h And ALL INDICAlOR INDACAlOR J>CATlON COMMLNAY
)
TUTAL LOCATIONS WIT 11 HIG11EST ANNUAL MEAN LOCA110NS IDCATIONS NUMBERS Of NOMI% AL NAME ANALYSIS ects)
MEAN MIN MAX ptsrect MEAN MIN MAX MIAN MIN MAX MEAN MIN MAX PERFORMED c
o A.4 niuscrios c
o e
o e
a 1-131 41b 0.042 (MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA (MDC NA NA (MDC NA NA 0
208 0
0 0
$2 0
156 i
l I
l Wterrruncd i rom Mcamicincnts Wuh iktectanic Acuvuy Uniy.
(A) No Nonroutinc Aw>mahrus Mcamrtments Rep >ned LLring This Penod.
tB)Mean Minimum Iknectable Concentration Calculaud Per Table 20f This Report.
(C) Number of Mcamicments Wah Ekscctable Actieuy Unly.
i iD) TotalNurrdocr of Mcamrcments Taken.
Page 1 of 1 i
EXTERNAL RADIATION: OPERATIONAL RADIOACTIVITY
SUMMARY
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT j
LICENSE NOS. NPF-2 AND NPF-8 IlOUSTDN COUNTY ALABAMA
SUMMARY
REPORT 170M 10192 TU 123192 p>
TYPb And A.1 IND CA~IUR lhDiCA' LOR IDCAllON COMMUNilY CONTROL TOTAL LOCATIONS Wrni IIIGliEST ANNUAL MEAN I OCATIONS LOCATIONS NUMBERS Of wouisrt NAME l
ANALYSIS Mucint MEAN MIN MAX pts m ct MEAN MIN MAX MEAN MIN I MAX MEAN MIN MAX PERI ORMED c
o A.d nianx71oN c
D o
e D
ANNUAL 40 NA 533 w
'37.7 60.7
' PLANI PIEi54. oo.h 80 3 603 423n33 34.4 52.1 42.16e0 32.7 59.4 16 16 1.0 ML NE 1
1-18 18 6
6 QUARTER 157 NA 16w36 9.7 25.1 PLANT PERIM.
22.2000 19.8 25.1 13.4829 7.7 19.9 13.6391 5.6 18.8 64 64 1.0 MI, NE 4
4 70 70 23 23 SUM (E) 40 NA 62.7750
$3.9 833 PLANT PERIM.
833000 833 833 53.9M9 45.7 66.5 54.6000 46.6 70.9 16 16 0 6 MI. E 1
1 18 IS 6
6 i
1 i
t 6
Mcon - Ikscrmmed i rom Meansrrmeras Wuh Ikiecsabie Acutry uniy.
(A) No Nonrousne Arwmalous Measuremeras Reported Ikirmg This Period.
(B) Mean Minimum Iktecsable Cemcentradon Calculated Per Tab!c 2 of This Rep >rt.
(C) Number of Measurements Whh Iktectable Acdrity Only.
(D) TosaiNumber of Measurcmcrus ToLen (E) Sum of the four Guancrs TABLE 1992-3 Page 1 of 1 1
MILK: OPERATIONAL RADIOACTMTY
SUMMARY
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE NOS NPF-2 AND NPF-8 IlOUSTON COUNTY AIARAMA
SUMMARY
REPORT IROM 10192 TU 123192 m;
. ?'!N'? I ' '........
. -. -All NDICA' LOR
~
INDRWlOR AUCA'llON.. - -.... _....
COMMUhllY CONIKOL TYPb And TOTAL.
LOCAT10NS WIT 11 tilGilEST ANNIIAl, MEAN 1 OCATIONS
- 11) CATIONS NUMBERS Of soussat.
NAME ANALYSIS unc s>
MEAN MIN MAX DisTA*ct MEAN MIN MAX MiiAN MIN MAX MEAN MIN MAX PERFORMED c
o 4 4 pinarT10w c
o e
o e
o l
BA-140 26 1 47.154 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA (MDC NA NA 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
26 CS-134 26 12M6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
26 CS-137 26 12.646 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
26 1-131 26 12M6 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
26 K-40 26 12A46 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 13%Mri 1030 1510 l
0 0
0 0
0 0
N>
M LA-140 26 9.769 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA (MDC NA NA 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
26 l
I l
l l
l l
1 l
l l
l l
h Mcun - Ikierreurrd s torn Mcamcmcrus Wuh iktecsabic Acuesty Ordy.
(A) No Nonroutire Anomalous Mea.usterrrrus Reponed Ihnng Tids Penod.
(Bi Mcan Mirdmum Ikreciable Coru cruration Calculased Per Table 2 ol Tids Rcport.
(C) Numbcr of Mea.surements Wuh Ikicciabic Actiehy Ordy.
(D) TotalNumber of Mca.naremeras Taken.
TABLE 1992-4 Page 1 of 1 I
VEGETATION: FORAGE. OPERATIONAL RADIOACTIVITY
SUMMARY
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE NOS. NPF-2 AND NPF-8 !!OUSTON COUNTY AIAHAMA
SUMMARY
REPORT IROM 10192 TO 1 U192 t4) l ol i < t% I Ac..M i i o D Pb And ALL INDICAlOR INDICA' LOR LOCAllON COMMUNAY i
CONTROL TOTAL LOCADONS WIT 11 IllGHEST ANNUAL MEAN I OCADONS 1.OCATIONS NUMBERS Of h0M ML NAME i
ANALYSIS wocisj MEAN MIN MAX Dinart MIAN MIN MAX MEAN MIN MAX lMEAN MIN MAX PERI ORMED e
-o u carrnow c
o e
o j
c o
AC-223 1
oS1w NA NA NA NA NA NA NA J NA NA NA
'i 74 0ml 174 174 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 BE-7 39 M.E97 u26.48m 130 1480 SSE PERIM.
5 M 6923 153 1480 NA NA NA 711.3M 139 Ifue 25 26 1.0 MI. SSE 13 13 0
0 13 13 B1-214 1
M.F97 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 891KKN) 89 89 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 i
CS.134 39 M.897
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
26 0
0 0
0 0
13 CS-137 39 M.897
<MDC NA NA NA (MDC NA NA NA NA NA 43fMKW) 43 43 0
26 0
0 0
0 1
13 1-131 39 14.436
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
26 0
0 0
0 0
13 K-40 39 103.795 4577.5N 6
70 NORlll I ERIM. 4833 07ti 100 70 NA NA NA 5232.307 2_'90 7190 TL2M 1
18100 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 44.0000 44 44 0
0 0
0 0
0 1
1 I
i l
l Elcan - Ikierrrured I rorn Mcamrcrncrus bs ~uh ikscciat>ic ktwar) Only.
(Al No Nonrou:ine Arwrn::lous Measurerncnts Reported ikring This Period.
iB) Mean Mirurnurn Iktectable Concentration Calculated Per Tabic 2 of This Rcpon.
(C) Nurr.ber of Mcawcments With Ektectable Aanity Ordy.
4D) TotalNurnbcr of Measurconents Taken.
(E)Mean arct/ Dry Ratio for 2*:
, ice TABLE 1992-5 Page 1 of 1 i
SOIL: OPERATIONAL RADIOACTIVITY
SUMMARY
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE NOS. NPF-2 AND NPF-8 IlOUS1DN COUNTY A1AHAMA
SUMMARY
REPORT 11 TOM 10192 TO 123192 (n MoII <I\\ \\ll( o 11% i Ar.. Inn o TYPE And ALL INDICA 10R ~
lhDICAIOR LOCAllON COMMUNITY j
CONTROL TOTAL IDCATIONS WIT 11 filGilEST ANNUAL. MEAN IDCA710NS IDCATIONS NUMBERS Of hourut NAME ANALYSIS
- uton, MIAN MIN MAX turrect MliAN MIN MAX MliAN MIN MAX lMiiAN MIN MAX PERI ORMED e
o A.4 orksx tiow e
o e
o l
c o
AC-22n 12 335.0W 1491.14 m
327 N L. PERIM.
3270 4kl 3230 3270
%.3333 bib 1310 1515.00 1140 1m 7
7 1.0 MI. NE I
1 3
3 2
2 BI-212 12 793.917 1143R>
871 1310 PLANT PERIM.
1310 00 1310 1310 46(KKM1 806 806 n95.5(KKI 624 767 3
7 1.0 MI. SSE 1
1 1
3 2
2 BI-214 12 793 917 1912.85 9's0 3810 PLANT PERIM.
M10 (Wm 3810 3810 1563.333 1010 2490 1142.00 SN 1480 7
7 1.0 M1. SSE 1
1 3
3 2
2 CS-137 12 793 917 100(KKo 36 277 PLANT PERIM.
277.(M KNI 277 277 158.5(OJ 64 253 140.5(KK1 126 155 7
7 0.8 MI. WNW I
I 2
3 2
2 K-40 12 793.917 f2AK.571 1210 8220 PLANT PERIM.
8220 (Nki 8220 8220 1349 0(wl 835 2290 2150AKI 1150 3150 7
7 0.8 MI. E 1
1 3
3 2
2 P11212 12 305.417 1058 Riri 535 2320 NE PERIM.
2320 (Kkl 2320 2320
- 1019R, 809 1140 1013.00 986 1040 6
7 1
1 3
3 2
2 PB-214 12 289.750 2232.857 IOW 3930 PLANT PERIM.
3930 (Kxi 3930 3930 1366.33J 916 2210 2128AKI 936 3320 7
7 1.0 MI. SSE 1
1 3
3 2
2 71 208 12 120SK) 541.142 382 1200 NE PERIM.
12(Kukki 1200 1200 397hi67 271 4k8 515SKW1 423 608 7
7 1.0 Ml. NE 1
1 3
3 2
2 I
l l
1 i
ATan - Incinuned i rurn Mea.wrerneras H uh incciabic Actnuy Ordy.
(A) No Nonroutine Anomalous Afeamrements ReporscdIkaring Ihis Periott (B) hfcan Afmimum Ek tectabic Concentration Calculated Per Table 2ef This Rcy>n.
(C) Number of Measwcrnents Whh Dcicciabk Activity Only.
(DJ TotalNumber of Ascamremeras Takert TABLE 1992-6 Page 1 of 1 i
WATERBORNE: SURFACE WATER-OPERAT!ONAL RADIOACTIVITY
SUMMARY
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE NOS. NPF-2 AND NPF-8 IlOUSTON COUN TY ALABAMA
SUMMARY
REPORT IROM 10142 TO 123i?2 :4i b 9.Y.'#fl!
....l.DCAllON. _... -.... _ _.. _
_.. _... _. -.. _... _ _ _ _ _.. _..... _..... CON 1ROL D Pb And
_.. _....AL
, INDICA'l OR lhDICA lO -(
COM AiN1'iY
'IUTAL 1.OCATIONS
%Tni HIGlirST ANNUAL MEAN l
l OCATIONS IDCATIONS WUMBERS Of moutsAL i
NAME ANALYSIS utosi MEAN MIN MAX ptSIA%cr MEAN MIN MAX MEAN MIN MAX jMEAN MIN MAX PERIORMED C
D A.d NRftT104 C
D C
D I
C D
BA-140 24 lb.?on (MDC NA NA l NA (MDC NA NA NA NA NA
'<MDC NA NA 0
12 0
0 0
0 0
12 CO-58 24 4.125
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
12 0
0 0
0 0
12 COM 24 4 125
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
12 0
0 0
0 0
12 CS-134 24 4.125
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA (MDC NA NA 0
12 0
0 0
0 0
12 CS-137 24 4,125
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
12 0
0 0
0 0
12 IT259 24 8.333 (MDC NA NA NA (MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
12 0
0 0
0 0
12 LA 140 24 3.333
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
12 0
0 0
0 0
12 MN 54 24 4.(Km
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA (MDC NA NA 0
12 0
0 0
0 0
12 NB 95 24 4.167
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
12 0
0 0
0 0
12
)
'IRITIUM 8
100.875 395 (KKkl 183 6R.*
GPPC 395.(KKel 183 683 NA NA NA 134 (KKM 134 134 3
4 RIV. MI. 40 3
3 0
0 1
4 7.N 45 24 8.625
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
12 0
0 0
0 0
12 ZR-95 24 6.958
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA (MDC NA NA 0
12 0
0 0
0 0
12 i
i t
l i
Mean D>cicrrruned rom Mcamicmcrus Wuh IJcicaabic h muy Ordy.
(A) No Nonroutinc Anomalous Measuremerus Reponed Ikiring Tids Penod.
(B) Mean Mmimum ik scaai>!e Concerurazion Calculatcd Per Tame 2 cf Tids Rep >n.
(C) Number of Measurements n'uh IktectaNe Actinty Only.
tDJ TotalNumhcr of Mcamrcmcrus Taiccn.
TABLE 1992-7 Page 1 of 1 e
WATERBORNE: GROUND WATER-OPERATIONAL RADIOACTIVITY
SUMMARY
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE NOS. NPF-2 AND NPF-8 IlOUSTUN COUNTY ALABAMA
SUMMARY
REPORT IROM 10192 TO 123192 m)
.... W!'?. '?? ?
- l!!' ???. '! '..
T)Pb And
[
-......ALL INDKAlOR lhDICAlOR LOCAL. ON COMMUN. lY
.- -... CON 1ROL
)
TOTAL LOCATIONS Wml lilCrHEST ANNUAL MEAN LOCATIONS IDCATIONS NUMBER $0f womw.
NAMii ANALYSIS
- wDos, M11AN MIN MAX partwt MIAN MIN MAX MEAN MIN MAX MEAN MIN MAX PERFORMED e
D And bfR5XmON C
D C
D C
D BA.140 6
l 17.N0
<MDC NA NA NA (MDC NA NA NA NA NA (MDC NA NA O
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 CO-58 8
3E75
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 COM 8
3.875
<MDC NA NA NA (MDC NA NA NA NA NA (MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 CS-134 6
3E75
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 CS 137 8
3E75
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 fli-59 8
8.500
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 1 131 8
0.246
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 1A-140 6
3.500
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA l<MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 MN64 8
4 000
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 NB-95 8
4.125
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 1RillUM 6
100.000
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 ZN 45 8
9.250
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA M*
NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 I
ZR-95 8
6.625
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
4 0
0 0
0 0
4 l
M. Lkterrmivd Irom Meaneremcrus Wah Daccsabic kway uriy.
(A) No Nontoutine Anomalous Mcamremcrus Reponed Iksring Tids Period.
(B) Mcan Mirimum Iktectable Conceruration Calculazed Per labic 2 of Tius Rcpon.
(C) Nwnber of Mcamremerus Whh Iksectable Actielty Ordy.
tD)loza! Number of Mcassrements Taken.
TABLE 1992-0 Page 1 of 1
SEDIMENT: RIVER-OPERATIONAL RADIOACTIVITY
SUMMARY
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE NOS. NPF-2 AND NPF4 llOUS10N COUNTY ALABAMA
SUMMARY
REPORT FROM 10192
- IU 121192 (A)
TUTAL 1 OCATIONS
%TDI li!GilEST ANNUAL MEAN 3 1.OCA110NS IOCA110NS q
NUMBERS Of hoursat NAME l
l ANALYSIS
- wros, MEAN MIN MAX Distswer MIAN MIN MAX lMEAN MIN MAX MFAN MIN MAX PERIURMED c
o
- s. dom wnow c
o l c
o e
o AC-22a 4
161.250 2570MI 22W 285u SMiDi3BLND 2570.ow 22
- 2850 NA NA NA
'1934OW G
2940 2
2 RIV. MI. 41 2
2 0
0 2
2 BI-212 4
658.750 3285.(KNI 2870 3700 SMITil'S BEND 3285.(kki 2870 3700 NA NA NA 2720.(KNI 1230 4210 L
2 2
RIV.MI 41 2
2 0
0 2
2 BI-214 4
658.750 1190.00 IMO 1240 SMITil S BEND 11M00 1990 1240 NA NA NA 913.50(kl 557 1270 2
2 RIV. MI. 41 2
2 0
0 2
2 CS-134 4
658.750 1M3Kul 1M 138 SMMlrS ilEND 1%#Kkl 1%
IM NA NA NA 51.(NNA 51 51 1
2 RIV. MI. 41 1
1 0
0 1
2 CS-137 4
658.7M
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
2 i
K-40 4
330.250 3355(41 2470 4240 SMI11I'S !!END 3355fKvl 2470 4240 NA NA NA NWio.(KKI 2210 3790 2
2 2
2 0
0 2
2 i
PB-212 4
M.000 1965.(Knl 1%0 2070 SMITil'S BLND 19651Kkl 1%D 2070 NA NA NA 1486 (KW 662 2310 2
2 RIV.MI 41 2
2 0
0 2
2 PB-214 4
97300 Il2451ol 1150 1340 SMITirS BEND 1245.0(Kl 1150 1340 NA NA NA 911300 583 1240 2
2 RIV. MI. 41 2
2 0
0 2
2 RA-2%
4 662300 1590MJ 14w 1640 SMITil'S BEND 1540(o1 100 1690 NA NA NA 1276.500 M3 1690 2
2 RIV. MI 41 2
2 0
0 2
2 11c208 4
50.000 al53fKKl 821 1010 SMU1I S HEND 9153(KK1 821 1010 NA NA n9630fk1 343 1050 i
l NA 2
2 RIV. MI. 41 2
2 i
0 0
2 2
t r
t l
i l
Mcan - Descrrruned i rom Meawemems it uh Desecsabie Acunty Only.
(A) No Norvoutine Anomalous hicawcments Rcponed During This Period iB) Mean Afinircram Ikicciabic Cemcentration Calculaicd Per Tabic 2 ef This Report.
(C) Nur+ct of Mcasurements ?Yith Ikscciable Activity Only.
(D) Total Number of Mcasuremerus Takcrt TABLE 1992-9 Page 1 of 1 l
e-FISH: RIVER (GAME)-OPERATIONAL RADIOACTIVITY
SUMMARY
JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LICENSE NOS. NPF-2 AND NPF-8 IlOUSTON COUNE~ ALABAMA
SUMMARY
REPORT FROM 10192 TO 123192 te l
__. _: 4 * !'"??_' ? !.A!'??I I!"?I' 3YPb And A _L INDICA 10R
. LNDILAlOR LOCA110N-..-.-[..._...-..
CONTROL- - -.....
COMMUNil'Y TOTAL LOCNIlONS WTT11 lilGilFST ANNUAL MEAN l I OCATIONS 10 CATIONS NUMBERS Of sowim NAME l
l ANALYSIS Mocian MEAN MIN MAX pntwT M1AN MIN MAX lMEAN MIN MAX
'MEAN MIN MAX PERIORMFD e
o A.4 nias m ow e
o l c
o e
o
( 0-5s 4
21ho (MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
2 0
0 0
0 O
2 C040 4
2h.250 (MDC NA NA NA (MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
2 CS-134 4
2A.250
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA i
I 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
2 CS-137 4
28.250 32.5000 28 37 SMFIlrS BEND 323000 28 37 NA NA NA 28AKO 28 28 2
2 0
0 i
IE59 4
28.250
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA (MDC NA NA 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
2 K-40 4
165.500 2A45MI 2810 290 SMITil'S BEND 2M5MI 2610 2MO NA NA NA 025Exl 2Mio 3190 j
2 2
2 2
0 0
2 2
l MN.54 4
21.750
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
2 ZN45 4
55.500
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA (MDC NA NA
)
0 2
0 0
0 0
0 2
J l
r I
I Mean - ikscrrmned a rom Mcaucrrrrus Wah ikiccsathc Acwity Ordy.
(A) No Nontoutirr Arwmalous Meawcrrents Reponed ihmng This Period.
(B) Mcan Minimum ik sectable Corwcmration Calculated Per Tabic 2 of This Rcpan.
IC) Number of Meawemens Whh Iktectab]c Activity Only.
(D) Total Number of Meawemcras Talcrt TABLE 1992-10 Page 1 of 1
FISH: RIVER (BOTTOM FEEDING)-OPERATIONAL RADIOACTRflTY
SUMMARY
i JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT LICILNSE NOS. NPF-2 AND NPF4 IlOUS'IUN COUNTY ALARAMA
SUMMARY
Rl; PORT IROM 10192 TD 123192 (A) l
.....' ???' L \\ !'?'!? ' ? ? !'? ?'.'.! il A ** * ' ' ' ?'
. ~
TYPE And A L IND :CA' LOR INDICAIUR LOCAllON
-COMMLNilY CONAROL TOTAL LOCA110NS WFni HIG11EST ANNUAL MF.AN I OCATIONS IDCATIONS NUM11ERS Of howisAt NAME l
l ANALYSIS utic4mi MEAN MIN MAX pasTANct MLAN MIN MAX iMEAN MIN MAX [MEAN MIN MAX PERFORMED c
o Aw itskr.cTio%
e o
e o l c
o 0 0-53 4
20.750 f(TiDC NA NA NA
< MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
2 C0-60 4
29Ao
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
2 CS-134 4
29AO
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
2 CS-137 4
29.000
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
2 Hi-59 4
29Aio
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA (MDC NA NA 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
2 K-40 4
IMut0 2425MM 2380 2470 SMFIll'S HEND 2425.ON 2.k0 2470 NA NA NA 2535 Am 2440 2630 l
2 2
2 2
0 0
2 2
MN-54 4
21 AiG (MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA (MDC NA NA 0
2 0
0 0
0 0
2-j ZN 45 4
55.250
<MDC NA NA NA
<MDC NA NA NA NA NA
.<MDC NA NA j
0 2
0 0
0 0
1 0
2 l
l l
4 i
i l
EaTIkterrruned t rom Mcamremcrus H uh Dcscuabic Actorsty Uniy.
(A) No Nonroutine Anomahnus Mcamremerus Reprxed Ikring This Period.
(B) Afcan Afinimum Ikiccsabic Conceruraticm Calculated Per Tabic 2 of This Reprt.
(C) Number of hfcamremerus With Ekscciabic Ac1rcity Ordy.
ID) TotalNumber of Afcamrements ToLen.
TABLE 1992-11 Page 1 of 1 4
l
J. M. Faricy Annual Environmental Operatm.g Report N: clear Mean Annual Air Gross Beta PI:nt 1E+(M)_
r
~_
1E -
m L
g
+
U k
IE e y t
N/
N/
t
. N y
IE-03 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-X-Indicator Z~
Community Control C MDC m,,,
Page 1 of 26
. ~.
3 " " *'
Annual Environmental Operating Report Nucie Mean Annual Air Gross BE-7
{
l E+00_
IE j m
f
.L
.Q
../
i E
%FLP'
~
U N
4 A
x N
~/N/
IE-02:
N';
~
l l
PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 IN90 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-M-Indicator Z Community ---- Control R MDC attachment 2 Page 2 of 26
- [';["**
Annual Environmental Operating Report
(
Mean Annual Air Gross CS-137
{
pi,,
1
^
\\
__?
1 P
N b
~
l
. ~ /A
/h A
~
/
\\
l p
IE A T
3, y
I 1E-04 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-M-Indicator E Community "; Control.
E MDC Atta m ent 2 Page 3 of 26
-.... -.~
- $';I",**
Annual Environmental Operating Report
{
Mearl Arititial Air 1-131 PI:nt 1E+(X)_
m I
IE n
~ 'N L_
%c 1E-02 4
PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 IWO 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date X Indicator Z Community '" Control Z MDC attachment 2 Page 4 of 26 i
J'$';j"**
Annual Environmental Operating Report
{
pi ot Mean Annual External Gamma 1E+02 i
1 f
f:f
.?
?h" r
~=
^ m/
%/
- %Q_
/
1 E + 01-q 1-4 y
I j
_J L
a 1E+00 i
i PRE-OP 1978-1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-X-Indicator
~ Community = Control C LLD m,
Page 5 of 26
J. M. Farley Anntial Environmental Operating Report N: clear PI:nt Mean Annual Milk Concentration I E+02_
~
-_ ?%.
N.
~
/
/
\\
a
/N
.X x
@ 1E+01-
\\
a a
/
e IE+00 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992
'1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date X BA-140 Control Z CS-134 Control
, BA-140 MDC C CS-134 MDC Page 6 of 26
J. M. Farley Anntial Environmental Operating Report N: clear Pi ni Mean Annual Milk Concentration
{
- 1 E + 02_
/
~/\\
N.
N 1
y'<
x f
1 E + 01-
\\
/
d U
~
\\
I E + 00-2
\\
1
/ ;c\\
c
\\
y%
y m__:
N
~-
- \\.
1E-01 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1977-1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-M-CS-137 Control E I-131 Control
. ---.2...
..1,_.-.
J. M. Faricy Annual Environmental Operatm.g Report N: clear Mean Annual Milk Concentration
{
ri:nt IE+ 04-t I
L i
y" x
r y
z':
~
- \\
s 1
a
..~V
@ IE+02:
i N
{
4---t f
4 I E+ 01-g u:
IE+00 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-M-- K-40 Control
^?.
{+ LA-140 MDC Page 8 of 26 I
l l
J. M. Farlev Annual Environmental Operating Reaort N: clear PI:nt Meari Annual Forage Concentration AC-228
{
IE+03
/\\
~
/b
{
\\q[ ((
\\
~7 1.
i$
\\
'/
\\
y
~'
w
/'
J cr: I E+ 02-O l
g
.m q7 E
l 1
E
~
0 m
4 l
1E+01 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date X Indicator Z Control - MDC
$$h$ToS2$
.~.
. -------..-= -
n
J[,';j",**
Annual Environmental Operating Report
'PI:nt Mean Annual Forage Concentration BE-7
{
IE+05 j
P 1E+04:
j i -%
- xg
(
\\
M
_ /\\
F y lE+03-S
'N 2
_.a
- 8 1E+02:
N s
E IE+01 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 19'88 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981-1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-M-Indicator Z Control
- " MDC attachment 2 Page 10 of 26
o
- $';5",**
Annual Environmental Operating Report PI:nt Mean Annual Forage Concentration CS-137
{
1 E+ 03_
1 C
A N
E
~
v/~ ~)
-s F
NN
/\\
N I E + 02-
~
N' Wx
\\
/\\
s i
\\/
N/
\\
CL b
n i
1E+01 1988 1990 1992 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982-1984 1986 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-X-Indicator -79 Control MDC
,,t,c,,,,,
Page 11 of 26
a.u rarier Annual Environmental Operating Report N; * ' * " '
Mean Annual Forage Concentration I-13 h
Pl:nt 1E+04
~
p
,/X\\
h a
g r
E IE+03:
E M
E M
t Q
I eg
_. g
-t
,/
N E
E+02 p
KW(
=
5 N
1E+01 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
--X-Indicator :: Control + MDC attachment 2 Page 12 of 26
~. - -
J. M. Farley Annual Environmental O erating Report N: clear pi nt Mean Annual Soil In S tu AC-228
{
1E+04_
L i
N
^
i-Q'
.g g
t' -
~
Q
~
w s
N s? 1E+03-
\\
- x N
~
1
~
IE+02 1982 1984 1986 1988 _
1990 1992 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 l
Date i
X Indicator Z Community + Control
- 2 MDC Page 13 of 26
'cifa Annual Environmental Operating Report
{
Mean Annual Soil In S tu CS-137 punt 1 E +03_
~
_ A,
~g ac c
N N-
\\
4h
~
2 1
8 y 1E+02-
.b
}
/
N
~7
.-r IE+01 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992.
1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date X Indicator Z Community ':
Control E MDC
,tt,c,,,nt,
Page 14 of 26 w.
J. M. Farley Annual Environmental Operating Report
- merca, Mean Annual River Water Conc. Tritium
{
Pl:nt 1E+03q
~
l A
__/h
/
A""N
~
/
h8 N
/
N/
N
/
N
!d x/
I E+ 02-N N-
~
1E+01 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 i
PRE-OP 1978 1980 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-m-Indicator Z Control
- ~ MDC -
Page 15 of 26
J. M. Farley Annual Environmental Operating Report N: clear Mean Annual River Water Conc. CS-134 pi:nt 1 E+ 02_
_J
+
j/h,
- -\\/' /
eO 1E+01-m V
\\,'
jw.
..w dr..
1E+00 l
PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date X Indicator Z Control MDC Page 16 of 26 b..
J. M. Farley Annual Environmental Operating Report
'N: clear Mean Annual River Water Conc. CS-137
{
PI:nt IE+ 02_
b
~
I d
/
lE+01-y
\\
J 3
... ww.
IE+00 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988
-1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 l
Date.
i
-X-Indicator Z Control MDC Page 17 of 26
J. M. Faricy Annual Environmental Operating Report N:cicar Mean Annual Ground Water Conc. Tritium PI:nt 1E+03 l
)%[
.\\
/\\
iE+02-
/
d
~+ - ~
Nx k
- N N-
~
I h[
IE+01 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-M-Indicator Z Control
- MDC -
Page 18 of 26
J. M. Faricy Annual Environmental OperatingS-134 Report Nuclear Mean Annual Ground Water Conc.
PI:nt 1 E + 02_
@ IE+01:
L s
se IE+00 1988 1990 1992 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-M-Indicator E Control MDC Page 19 of 26 u
J. M. Farley Annual Environmental Operatm.g Report N cicar Mean Annual Ground Water Conc. CS-137 PI:nt IE+ 02_
~
=
n n
a 8 IE+01-
- %c
[,
x IE+(X) 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 i
i
- PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date l
l
-M-Indicator :Z Control
- MDC Page 20 of 26 t
I
J. M. Farley Annual Environmental Operating Report N: clear Pirnt Mean Annual River Sediment AC-228
{
IE + 04_
~
}%
~
7 1e+o>;
/
A A-x s
b Q
~
o N
\\
j<7
[
N
~
l Q/
/
~*
IE+02-
/
[
IE+01 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date X Indicator E Control MDC attachment 2 Page 21 of 26
J. M. Faricy Annual Environmental Operating Report N clear cent Mean Annual River Sediment BI-14
{
I E+04_
3 I E+ 03-s
,a o
/
eO i
4 IE+02-N
/L l
A 3
l 1E+01 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 19'88 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983-1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-X-Indicator 1 Control
" ' M DC At,,,,,,,,
Page 22 of 26
3
- $';I"**
Annual Environmental Operating Report Mean Annual River Sediment PB-212
{
pi,t 1 E+ 04_
/ J I E + 03-V 5
-[d
-\\/
M l
i 4
A/
I E+ 02-N
/\\_
/
x_
2
/
V 1E+01 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 l
PRE-OP 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
>< Indicator ::: Control MDC Page 23 of 26
.1. M. Faricy Annual Environrnental Operating Report Nrcicar PI::nt Mean Annual River Sediment TL-208
{
1 E+ 04_
1E+03-3-
I
.f -
g o
\\
//
O
~
s/
/
_ k
/\\
- l I E+02-y
/
\\ -'
s i
\\-
/-
\\/
N/\\
/
1E+01-PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-M-Indicator E: Control MDC
,,,,,,,,n, Page 24 of 26
J. M. Varley Annual Environmental Operating Report Nuclear Mean Annual Game Fish Concentrations
{
PI:nt 1E + 05_
1 E+ 04-
/N x
8 s-N g
's f --
.E N-f
^
tS 1E+03:
O E'
i
~
k
,y I E + 0'-
~ /b'
~
7IN E
z
=
\\/
Y/Q
%cs 2
/
-m 1E+01 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 PRE-OP 1978 1980 1982 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date
-M-Indicator CS-137 E Control CS-137 " MDC CS-137 C Indicator K-40.
-M-Control K-40 Ac MDC K-40 attachment 2 Page 25 of 26 m.
.J. M. Farley Annual Environmental Oaerating Report N: clear pi:nt Mean Annual Bottom-Feeding Fish Conc.
{
IE+05_
~
l I E+04-
)t
/
.s
/
N 2c o
- ~
ad b%p q
is
/
!!: IE+03:
/
.g/--
O 4-O l
A
+
s
~
+
IE+02:
j
}?. 4
/
L.
-~
- W[
[g/
\\
N17 I
IE+01 PRi$-OP 1978 Id80 1982 Id84 1986 1988 1990 1992 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 Date X Indicator CS-137 ~Ji Control CS-137 MDC CS-137 C Indicator K-40
-M-Control K-40