ML20034G011

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed TS 3/4.6.1.2 Re Surveillance Testing for Measuring Leakage Rate for Airlocks After Each Opening
ML20034G011
Person / Time
Site: Perry 
Issue date: 03/01/1993
From:
CENTERIOR ENERGY
To:
Shared Package
ML20034G009 List:
References
NUDOCS 9303080062
Download: ML20034G011 (2)


Text

!

t P y-cer/NRR-15 77 L A %G.u + 2 b

p CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS fa.3e I ef 2

{

t&

y BASES e

.M lace 4% Bucs thk-up i

3/4.6.1 CONT AINMENT (Continued)

P the no.t > 3c, en f

3/4.6.1.2 CCNTAINMEF LEAKAGE (Continued) l f

The surveillance testing for measuring leakage rates is consistent wit (grantedfortestingtheairlocksaftereachopening.'therequirementsofAppendixJto 3/4.6.l.3 CONTAINMENT AIR LOCKS s

The limitations on closure and leak rate for the containment air locks are required to meet the restrictions en PRIMARY CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY and tne ccntainment leakage rate given in Specifications 3.6.1.1 and 3.6.12.

The specification makes allowances for the fact that there may be long period; of+ time when the air locks will be in a closed and secured position during reactor operation. Only one closed door in each air lock is required to main-ta.in the integrity of the containment.

The air supply to the containment air lock and seal system is the semice and instrument air system. The system consists of two 100% capacity air compressors per unit and can be cross-connected. This system is redundant and extremely reliable and provides system pressure indication in the control c

room.

3/4.6.1.4 MSIV LEAKAGE CONTROL SYSTEM Calculated doses resulting from the maximum leakage allowance for the main steam line isolation valves in the postulated LOCA situations would be a small fraction of the 10 CFR 100 guidelines, provided the main steam line system from the isolation valves up to and including the turbine condenser remains intact.

Operating experience has indicated that degradation has occasicrally occurred in the leak tightness of the MSIV's such that the specified leakage requirements have not always been maintained continuously.

t The requirement for the leakage control system will reduce the untreated leakage from the M51V's when isolation of the primary system and containment is required.

3 /4. 6.1. 5 CONTAINMENT STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY This limitation ensures that the structural. integrity of the containment will be maintained comparable to the original design standards for the life of the unit.

Structural integrity is required to ensure that the containment will withstand the maximum pressure of 15 psig in the event of a LOCA. A visual inspection in conjunction with Type A leakage tests if sufficient to demonstrate this capability.

E f.$

l

.~

g PERRY - UNIT 1 B 3/4 6-2 Amendment No. 19 9303080062 930301 PDR ADOCK 0500 0

P

~_ _

t PY-CEI/NRR-1577 L

'j Page 2 of 2 P

BASES MARK-UP:

I The following text is taken from Attachment 2 to letter PY-CEI/NRR-1576 L, dated March 1, 1993, with the addition of the new exemption discussed in this letter (PY-CEI/NRR-1577 L):

{

i The surveillance testing for measuring leakage rates is consistent with the requirements of Appendix J to 10 CFR 50 with the exception of the following exemptions:

a)

Section III.D.2(b)(ii) - The air lock seal leakage test of Section III.D.2(b)(iii) of Appendix J may be substituted (follovir.g normal air lock door opening) for the full-pressure test provided that no maintenance has been performed that would affect the air locks sealing capability (Reference 1).

2 b)

Section III.A.5(b) - The design basis allovable leakage rate Lis(rather than the as-left acceptance criterion of 0.75 percent of L designated as the value against which the as-found Type A Te)s,t results are compared when scheduling for future periodic Type A tests in j

accordance vith Section III.A.6 of Appendix J (Reference 2).

j c)

Section III.A.l(a) - The Type A test does not need to be stopped if excessive leakage is determined, provided the leakage can be isolated and appropriately factored into the test results (Reference 3).

}

References (1) PNPP Safety Evaluation Report Supplement 7, Section 6.2.6 " Containment Leakage Testing," November 1985.

(2)

[ Exemption approval letter from the NRC.]

(3)

(Exemption approval letter from the NRC.]

1 r

P L

f I

i

?

4

.