ML20034B202

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Safety Evaluation Accepting Util Proposed Revised Capsule Withdrawal & Insertion Schedule for Plant
ML20034B202
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/19/1990
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20034B199 List:
References
NUDOCS 9004260160
Download: ML20034B202 (2)


Text

-

I e

[@ *%h UNITED ST ATES p,.

[

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION t

3 WA$NINGTON, D C. 205%5

(

.,p#

t

(

SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULAT FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION, ET AL.

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3JUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT 1

00CKET NO. 50-302 INTRODUCTION By letter dated March 22, 1990, _ Florida Power Corporation (the licensee) requested tnat the staff approve a revised capsule withdrawal and insertion l

l schedule for Crystal River 3 (CR-3), which is a host reactor for the Babcock & Wilcox Master Integrated Surveillance Program (BWMISP).

As a host reactor, the CR-3 reactor is used to irradiate surveillance materials for plants r

participating in the BWMISP.

The capsule withdrawal schedule for the BWMISP is documented in Babcock & Wilcox (BW) Topical Report BAW-1543.

Revision 3 to this topical report was submitted for staff review in a letter from J.H. Taylor to T.E. Murley, dated October 12, 1989.

Errsta Table E-1 to BAW-1543, Revision 3 was submitted for staff review in a letter from 0.L. Howell to B.J. Elliot dated January 10, 1990.

The errata table documents the changes to the insertion i

and withdrawal schedule for the BWMISP surveillance capsules in the CR-3 reactor.

(

DISCUSSION Appendix H, 10 CFR Part 50, indicates that the surveillance capsule withdrawal schedule should comply with ASTM E 185-82 unless an alternative schedule is

.i approved by the staff.

ASTM E 185-82 recommends that surveillance capsules should be withdrawn from the reactor when the neutron fluence received by the capsule reaches a specified amount.

The revised program documented in Tables 3-19 and errata E-1 will withdraw the third capsule (OC2-B) for Oconee Unit 2 (OC-2) and the fourth capsule (OC3-0) for Oconee Unit 3 (OC-3).

The neutron fluence for capsule OC2-B corresponds approximately to the end of life (32 effective full power years) neutron fluence for the limiting OC-2 beltline weld at the 1/4 thickness of the reactor vessel. 'The neutron fluence for capsule OC3-D corresponds approximately to the end of life. neutron fluunce for the limiting beltline weld at the inside surface of OC-3.

These capsules will be withdrawn during the CR-3 seventh refueling outage.

The early removal of these capsules is necessary because the plants had implemented " Low Leakage" core configurations.

" Low Leakage" core configurations reduce the neutron fluence at the inside surface of the limiting beltline weld.

i Since the revised core configuration reduces the neutron fluence, the capsules must be withdrawn earlier to reduce their neutron fluence.

During the CR-3 seventh.

l refueling outage, capsules A2, A4 and OC3-E will be inserted into the CR-3 t

reactor vessel.

The A2 and A4 capsules contain weld metal with high copper 6

content, which will be used to supplement the neutron irradiation material l

data for plants participating in the BWMISP.

Capsule OC3-E will be used to i

monitor neutron irradiation embrittlement of the materials in the 0C-3 reactor l

vessel.

.o 2

CONCLUSIONS 1.

With withdrawal of capsules 0C2-B and OC3-0 during the CR-3 of neutron fluence to satisfy the recommendations of ASTM E 2.

is acceptable to withdraw capsules OC2-B and OC3-0 A2, A3 and OC3-E during the CR-3 seventh refueling outage.

Dated:

April 19, 1990 Principal Contributor B. Elliot O

l e

I

'~

__--_-._______.-_____-.___m_._

-