ML20032C529

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-320/81-12. Review to Identify Procedures W/O Backup Contingency to Be Completed within One Month
ML20032C529
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 11/03/1981
From: Keimig R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: J. J. Barton
METROPOLITAN EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20032C530 List:
References
NUDOCS 8111100540
Download: ML20032C529 (2)


See also: IR 05000320/1981012

Text

-

.

'

'

p.

O

y

Q

k-

c

~.

.

Docket No. 50-320

NOV 3

1981

e.

.

Metropolitan Edison Company

g

r$ k

ATTH: Mr. J. J. Barton

/1

fBb LJ

E

Acting Director of TMI-2

NOVg g gggjo 1 [

P.O. Box 480

C

.

,

Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057

M u.s. g ,m

p

Gentlemen :

/

,

IN

Subject: Inspection 50-320/81-12

This refers to your letter dated October 11, 1981, in response to our

letter dated September 1,1981.

With respect to your response to the apparent noncompliance B.1 to

Appendix A to our letter, a meeting was held on October 23,1981, at the

site between Mr. R. Conte of our staff with you and other members of

your staff. This is to document our final position and our understanding

of your actions on this matter.

,.

We agree with your position that a prerequisite to a procedure is the (

means to " identify those independent actions or procedures which shall

~

<k

be completed and plant conditions which shall exist prior to the use of

the subject procedure". This is consistent with your NRC approved

Recovery Quality Assurance Plan in which you are committed to American

National Standards Institute (ANSI) N18.7-1976 (paragraph 5.3.2(4)).

However, your response overlooks the generic issue that your organization

established an operability requirement for a radiation monitor as a

o.og

prerequisite to the main body of the procedure without a contingency

e-T

(established procedure / procedural steps) for operator action if the

$5

radiation monitor became inoperable. Your response recognizes the

og

specific inadequacy with respect to the area radiation monitor CN-RIT-IX-03

by a commitment to revise SDS operating procedures for "more specific

y:n

direction involving this detector...when this detector is taken out of

og

service".

o-

u85

At the meeting of October 23, 1981 you_ indicated that other operating

gy

and special operating procedures may have similar inadequacies and that

a review to establish the scope of this problem would be initiated for

subsequent scheduling of corrective action:..

A date for completion of

this initial review could not be finalized at that meeting.

Therefore ,

we expect that, within 1 month of the date of this letter, you are aware

of the scope of this problem and have scheduled necessary corrective

actions.

!

')l[ %S l

OF FICE k

...... . ... .

.

. . .... ..

. ... .

. . .. . ....

.. . ............. .

....... .........

. .......... .....

SURNAMEf

. ...... .......

..

.......

. .. .

.

. .. ..

.. .

.. ... ...... ..

. . . ...........

. ............. ....

OATEf

........ . .. ..

.. ....... .... ...

...... . . ......

.... .... .. ...

. . ...... . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .

nac row aie no+ci nucu mo

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

  • um m-32nu

_ -

-

.

.

.

.

Metropolitan Edison Company

-2-

Accordingly, the item (B.1) remains an item of noncompliance.

Further

-

during the interim review period as noted above, we will continue to

enforce nuclear safety related and important to safety component / system

operability requirements in procedural prerequisites that do not have

adequate contingencies such as limit / precaution actions or other procedural

actions when that equipment becomes inoperable.

Thank you for infoming us of the corrective and preventive actions

documented in your letter. These actions will be examined during a

future inspection of your licensed program.

No response to this letter is required. However, if there are any

misunderstandings contained herein, please inform us as soon as possible.

Your cooperation with us is appreciate...

Sincerely,

R. R. Keinig, Chief

Projects Branch #2, Division of

Resident and Project Inspection

cc:

J. J. Barton, Director, Site Operations

J. E. Larson, Supervisor,1NI-2 Licensing

E. G. Wallace, PWR Licensing Manager

-

J. B. Liberman, Esquire

G. F. Trowbridge, Esquire

Public Document Room (PDR) (LPDR)

Local Public Document Room

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

HRC Resident Inspector

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Ms. Mary V. Southard, Co-Chairman, Citizens for a Safe Environment

bcc:

Region I Docket Room (w/ concurrence)

L. Barrett, Deputy Program Director, TMI Program Office

Chief, Operational Support Section

Ms. Mary V. Southard, Co-Chairman, Citizens for a Safe Environment

i

_

omer y THIRS

TMIRS

TMIRS

TMI 4

DRPI

.. p g S .. .. m .. .

. . , . .

.. .

...

... .

. . ...

. .

... . ..

RC[..

,gasa.no...... . MS.ha,n,ba,ky,,

. . .

. ... .

.' r

,,R,Ke

', g , ,

~~~>

../2#8!,,,,, ,,1 o/2p,1

j1o @ptt

19f2/81

=> 1 0/.4 /.81./.ime.[

.

s

,

,, , ,

,,,

,, , ,,

,,

1

.

.,

,,,,,,

,,

,,,

, , , , ,

,,,

, , ,,

,

,, ,,, ,,

.

.. .

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

soi sa?u ca

.

_

, ___

__

_

..

.

. .

.

nac ,onu m

_