ML20032B650
| ML20032B650 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hartsville  |
| Issue date: | 08/28/1981 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032B626 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-520-81-15, NUDOCS 8111050760 | |
| Download: ML20032B650 (1) | |
Text
-
a g g
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Tennessee Valley Authority Docket No. 50-520 Hartsville A2 License No. CPPR-152 As a result of the inspection conducted o-August 11-14, 1981, and in accordance with the Iderin Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980), the following violation was identified.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, as implemented by paragraph 17.lA.5 of the PSAR requires that activities affecting quality be prescribed by documented procedures and accomplished in accordance with these procedures.
Paragraph 2 of Procedure CEP 5.04 requires that documents, quality contro' instructions, and other special instructions and/or procedures necessary to perform the work be identified in the work package.
Paragraph 3.0 of Procedure QCI N-504 requires that two pre production stud welds be welded and tested prior to production stud welding.
Centrary to the above, on August 12, 1981, activities affecting quality were not accomplished in accordance with documented procedures in that work package B262-C2 for attachment of decking and studs to the control building structural steel did not reference the stud welding procedure or the stud welding inspection procedure and the two production test studs, for -the stud welding in progress on the control building steel, had not been welded and tested.
This is a Severity Level V Violation (Supplement II.E).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1) admission or denial of the alleged viola-tion; (2) the reasons for the violation if admitted; (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
The responses directed by this Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required ')y the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Date:AUG 2 81981 8111050760 811023 PDR ADOCK 05000 0
- - - -