ML20032B073
| ML20032B073 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Byron  |
| Issue date: | 10/21/1981 |
| From: | Norelius C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20032B072 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-454-81-16, 50-455-81-12, NUDOCS 8111040353 | |
| Download: ML20032B073 (1) | |
Text
M
'l.
/
)
4-Apperdix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION i
Commonyealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-454 Docket No. 50-455 As a result of the inspection conducted on September 22-25, 1981, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violation was identified:
10 CFR-50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, states in part, " Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality...are promptly identified and corrected."
Commonwealth Edison Company Topical Report No. CE 1-A, Revision 9, Section 16, states in part, "A corrective action system will be used to assure that such items...which are adver.e to quality and might affect the safe operation of a nuclear generating station are promptly identified and corrected."
Contrary to the above, the licensee had not taken the accessary actions to assure that an identified item of noncompliance, concerning the separation criteria between safety-related and non-safety-related cables, was promptly corrected. This is exemplified by the fact that the appropriate flatfield procedure addressed in the licensee'c correspordence, was not being imple-mented as of September 24, 1981.
The licensee committed to have the procedure implemented by June 1, 1981.
(Reference,VCo letter dated May 7, 1981, from Cordell Reed to James G. Keppler.)
This is a Severity Level V violation (Supplement II).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, you are required to submit to this office within thirt; days of the date of this Notice a written statement or cyplanation in reply, including for each item of noncompliance:
(1) cor-rective action taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. bader the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation.
Consideratica may be given to extendiag your response time for good cause shown.
Dated C. E. Norelius, Director Division of Engineering and Technical Inspection 8111040353 811023 PDR ADOCK 05000454 O
- -