ML20028C931
| ML20028C931 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 12/29/1982 |
| From: | Spencer G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Papay L SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20028C932 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301140321 | |
| Download: ML20028C931 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000206/1982036
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ . - . _ $'
\\ i DEC Z 91982 Docket No. 50-206 s < Southern California Edison Company 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue '
Rosemead, California 91770 .' Attention: Dr. L. T. Papay, Vice President- . Advanced Engineering , Gentlemen: ' Subject: NRC Inspection - San Onofre Unit 1 i This refers to the routine inspnction conducted by Mr.. G. Yuhas of this office on November 29 - December 3,1982 of activities authorized by HRC License No. DPR-13, and to the discussion of our findings held by Mr. Yuhas with Mr. W. Moody and other menbers of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection. l Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of , selective examinations of procedures and representative records, inter- ' views with personnel, and observations by the ' inspector. - , Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that one of your activities was not conducted in full compliance with NRC requimments, assetforthintheNoticeofV(olation,enclosedherewithasAppendixA.
Your response to this notice is'to be submitted in accordance with the
provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 as stated in Appendix A Notice of Violation. ' , This inspection included a followup of commitments made by you in your letter to us dated January 15, 1982 in response to our December 16, 1981 letter transmitting a Notice of' Violation and NRC Inspection Report No. 50-206/81-36. The substance of this correspondence concerned a significant progrannatic breakdown in your management of the affluent control and monitoring program at Unit 1. Our p mvious inspection followup in this area indicated'that corrective actions were being i implemented which were likely to be effective in avoiding further items of noncompliance and would significantly inprove your nanagement of . $0$$o$$$ " ed Mo / l ,=- ,w.. /4 g ... A f A .... ..#. i d . $ c p. aens p ..... . ... . L . . . . . . . . . .
.- . . .a,.y.eu..:.e... t.annexs.y . . . . , . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DATE) .12[ .[0 2..... .12[ .[hk... . .12[. [.hk.. .12[[ [.hk. . . . . .. . . . . ... ... NRC FORM 318 00-80) NRCM 024o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY . usom -m.m -- - - .- . - . - . .. . . . . - . - . - . . . - . . . . . - - - _ - . - . - , _ - . . . - . - . , - .
y -- h , 0 , i . .
., , i
- ,
" Southern California Edison Company -2- DEC 2 91982- ! these activities. " Although you'have done's comumendable job of evaluating ! the Operational Radiation Monitoring System and establishing an appropriate q effluent engineering function, this inspection has identified several b j! elements of your long term corrective actions, as identified in your. - January 15, 1982 letter, which were not implemented. The specific items ' are identified in paragraph' 3 of Inspection Report No. 50-206/82-36 (enclosed). We am concerned about the appamnt inability of lower management levels to effectively follow through with cose:1tments made by J higher management. : Accordingly,' in addition to your response to the
attached Notice of. Violation, we would also like you to infom us of
the current status and revised actions you plan to take concerning [* the items identified as 50-206/82-36-01, 02, 04, 05, and 06 in paragraph 3 of the attached-Inspection Repoit.~ We am particularly interested in
actions you plan to.take with respect to the Operational Radiation j Monitoring System in response to the significant technical deficiencies i identified with this system.- We would expect that problems associated I with this system would be resolved prior to the restart of Unit 1.
' In accorda'nce with 10 CFR 2.790(a). a copy of this-letter and the enclosures k will be placed in' the NRC Public Document Room unless you notify this i office, by telephone, within ten days of the date of this letter and - i submit written application to withhold information contained therein -[ within thirty days of-the date of this letter. Such application must be i consistent with the requirements of 2.790(b)(1). ! . Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be I glad to discuss them with-you. , [ 9. 7 i The responses directed by this letter and the accompanying Notice are not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and f Budget as required by the Paperwork Reductica Act of 1980, FL 96-511. 0 [ ' Sincerely, W = at m a; in
ll 3. IPUICE2
G. S. Spencer, Director
Division of Radiological Safety i: , and Safeguards Program j Enclosures: $ - A. Notice of Violation i B. Inspection Report i No. 50-206/82-36 j p cc w/o enclosure B:- d R. Dietch, Vice President, Huclear Engineering and Operations H. Ray, Station Manager, San Clemente .a bec: RSB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS) 'q Distributed by RV: RHE (w/o enc.B) State of California i A. Johnson (w/ enc.A) Resident Inspector Project Inspector p - h ,0 . ' [ 1 e- f~o .-.,..----.m-.. }}