ML20023D710
| ML20023D710 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 05/19/1983 |
| From: | Vassallo D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Pilant J NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20023D711 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-08295, TAC-8295, NUDOCS 8306020568 | |
| Download: ML20023D710 (3) | |
Text
_
I
+
- u
=
n
}N f
Q&
Y
/U5 /6
^
MAY 191983 NRCN
[
Docket No. 50-298 LPDR
/
? & C h0
}yS n n
{
N,uka pgg
._ CD i
Mr. J. H. Pilant, Director Licensing & Quality Assurance p gg_
=
Netraska Public Power District
- M,
=
P. O. Box 499
'p Columbus, Nebraska 68601
,=s s e
Dear Mr. Pilant:
SUBJECT:
RELIEF REQUESTS FROM INSERVICE INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS RE:
COOPER NU LEAR STATION E
[
By letters dated July 29,1977, March 23,1978, July 18,1978, December 18,
~
1980 and March 29, 1982, you submitted your inservice inspection program, y
revisions, and additional infonnation related to requests for relief from certain Code inspection requirements pursuant to 10 CRI 50.55a(g).
The purpose of this letter is to infom you of the results of the staff review i
of your relief requests and to grant relief in part frou the requirements of Section XI of the American Socie ty of Mechanice' Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (the Code) or impose other requirements, as appropriate.
The review of requests for relief from the ir, service inspection require-ment, has been completed. Based on the results of this rqview, the staff has detemined there are cases in which the relief is granted as requested.
In o ther cases, the relief requested is granted conditionall y, the conditions being clearly stated in the summary tables in the Safety Evaluation. One relief request was not granted because the component was alread, exempt under the regulation (relief therefore was not required).
ca e Q
Section 50.55a(g) of 10 CFR Part 50 requires that your program be revised go at 120-month intervals. The start of the next interval for your facility cao is July 1,1984, and your inservice inspection program must be based on og the edition and addenda of the Code incorporated by 10 CFR 50.55(a)(g) 12 months prior to that date. Any changes to your Technical Specifications no are requested to be submitted at least six months prior to the beginning I
c@
of a 120-month interval and it is requested that any requests for relief o<
from the Code requirements be provided on the same schedule. The staff 02 review of your relief requests for your next interval will be conducted on a schedule based on the pmgram revision requirements for your facility L
and is scheduled to be completed by July 1,1984.
Until that time you should follow the inservice inspection program proposed by your submittals,
=
- f.
Q rg
)
i i
modified as described terein and by any further relief granted or additional inspection imposed during the remainder of the period. Any relief from Code requirements granted herein expires on July 1,1984.
The enclosed Safety Evaluation delineates those items for which relief has been granted and alternate schedules and procedures defined. The staff has determined that where stated the Ccde requirements are imprac-tical, the granting of this relief is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, and is otherwise in the public interest considering the burden that could result if they were imposed on your facility.
Your Technical Specifications currently do not incorporate provisions for allowing relief granted from inservice inspection pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a(g),
Therefore, within 30 day: of receipt of this letter you should submit Techni-cal Specifications which incorporate appropriate changes to account for the relief requests granted.
The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements contained in this letter affect fewer than ten respondents, therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P. L.96-511.
Also enclosed is a copy of the Notice of Granting of Relief which is being filed with the Office of the Federal Register for publication.
Sincerely, ORIG 18AL 318 Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief Operating Reactors Branch f2 Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
Safety Evaluation Notice cc w/ enclosure:
See next page h
l 1
8
/ /8 M
ORB #2:DL ORB #1 :DL C-ddB#2:DL
-0R:DL[
DL
- ornce, SURNAME)
.e.
, y, y,asy,b 1
P/,(, !8 51 l
. 5LWl.8.3..
. 5.llfI..
.StBl.83..
51.0.18 3 5/1.11.83...
oan y Nnc reau 3 8 00-80) uncu om OFFIClAL RECORD COPY usanoi,ian-,soj
t t
\\
A
\\
1 Mr. J. M. Pflan r
NebraskaPublicfowerDistrict Cooper Nuclear Station' k
f cc:
Mr. G. D. Watson, General Counsel John T. Collins
. Nebraska Public Power District Regional Administrator, Region IV P. O. Box 499 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission C61umbus, Nebraska 68601 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76011 Mr. Arthur C. Gehr. Attorney Srell & Wilmer H. Ellis Simmons, Director 3100 Valley Center Division of Radiological Health Phoenix, Arizona 85073 Department of Health 301 Centennial Mall, South Cooper Nuclear Station P.O. Box 95007 ATTN:
Mr. L. Lessor Lincoln, Nebraska 68509.
Station Superintendent P. O. Box 98,
Brownville, Nebraska 68321 5
Director Nebraska Dept. of' Environmental Control P. O. Box 94877, State House Station Lincoln, Nebraska 68509 Mr. William Siebert, Cor:r.tissioner Namaha County Board of Jo::nissioners Nemaha County Courthouse Auburn, Nebraska 68305 Mr. Dennis Dubois USNRC Resident Inspector P. O. Box 218 Brownville, NE 68321 LF. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region VII Office Regional Radiation Representative 32 Cess.t-ilth Street l
Kansas City, MO, 64106 j
1
(
=
L...
j