ML20012C299
| ML20012C299 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Catawba  |
| Issue date: | 03/02/1990 |
| From: | Herdt A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20012C298 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-414-90-03, 50-414-90-3, NUDOCS 9003210006 | |
| Download: ML20012C299 (2) | |
Text
-
ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company Docket No. 50-414 Catawba Unit 2 License No. NPF-52 During the Nuclear Regulatory Cocrnission (NRC) inspection conducted on December 31, 1989 through January 27, 1990, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
In accordance with the " General Ecatement of Policy and Procedures for NRC Enforcement Actions." 10 CFR Part 2. Appendix C. (1989), the violation is listed below:
1 10 CFR 50. Appendix B. Criterion III. Design Control, reouires in part that measures be established to assure that applicable regulatory requirements are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions.
These measures shall include provisions to assure that appropriate quality standards are specified and included in design documents and that deviations from such standards are controlled.
Measures shall also be established for the selection and review for suitability of application of materials, parts, equipment, and processes that are essential to the safety-related functions of structures, systems and components.
Further, measures are to be established for the identification and control of design interfaces.
10 CFR 50. Appendix B. Criterion XVI. Corrective Action, requires in part that, measures be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected.
Including measures to assure that the cause of the condition is determined and corrective action taken to preclude -
repetition.
Technical Specification 3.7.7.. requires that two independent trains of Auxiliary Building Filtered Exhaust System be operable in Modes 1, 2. 3.
and 4.
Contrary to:
1.
The licensee failed to establish measures for identification and control of design interfaces between Auxiliary Building Ventilation i
and the Radiation Protection clothes dryers.
This resulted in inoperability of the safety related Auxiliary Building Exhaust i
System.
1 I
9003210006 900302
{DR ADOCK 05000413 PDC
Duke Power Company 2
Docket No. 50-414 Catawba Unit 2 License No. NPF-52 2.
On May 9, 1989, the licensee after determining the Unit 2 Auxiliary Building Filtered Exhaust (VA) System air flow monitor device.
2ABFX-AFMD-2, was clogged with lint, failed to promptly determine the cause and take corrective action to preclude repetition of the condition.
3.
The licensee failed to take adequate corrective action following identification of clogging in air flow monitor device 2ABFX-AFMD-2 on May 9, 1989 and May 25, 1989 to preclude repetition of this condition.
On November 11, 1989, the licensee determined that Unit 2 VA system air flow monitor device, 2ABFX-AFMD-1, was clogged with lint.
4.
Both trains of the Unit 2 Auxiliary Building Filtered Exhaust
-System, were inoperable for a period of five months between June 10 and November 11, 1989, while the unit operated in Modes 1, 2, 3 and 4.
This is a Severity Level IV Violation and applies to Unit 2 only.
(SupplementI)
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Duke Power Comp &ny is hereby required to submit a written statement or explanation to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ATTN: Document Control Desk. Washington, DC -20555, with a copy to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and a copy to the NRC Rgsident Inspector within thirty (30) days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice.
This reply should be clearly marked as a " Reply to a Notice of Violation" and should include for each violation: (1) admission or denial of the violation.
(2) the reason for the violation if admitted. (3) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved. (4) the corrective steps which will I
be taken to avoid further violations, and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to l
extending the response time.
If an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in this Notice, an order may be issued to show cause why the l
license should not be modified, suspended, or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION kY doch hlanR. Herd Chief u
Reactor Projects. Branch 3 Division of Reactor Projects Dated at Atlanta, Georgia l
this 2nd day of Ma r.1990
(
.