Proposed Tech Specs Re Acceptance Criteria for Absolute & Relative Position Indicator ChannelsML20011E412 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Davis Besse |
---|
Issue date: |
02/01/1990 |
---|
From: |
TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML20011E409 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
1750, NUDOCS 9002130369 |
Download: ML20011E412 (8) |
|
|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20216E6111999-09-0707 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.3.2.1 Re Safety Features Actuation Sys Instrumentation & Associated Bases ML20210H0731999-07-28028 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.5.1, Ultimate Heat Sink, Allowing Plant Operation in Modes 1-4 with Water Temp Less than or Equal to 90 F ML20210G4311999-07-27027 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TSs 6.4, Training, 6.5.2.8, Audits, 6.10, Record Retention, 6.14, Process Control Program & 6.15, Odcm ML20210G4801999-07-26026 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.3.2.1 Re Safety Features Actuation Sys Instrumentation & Associated Bases ML20210G9161999-07-26026 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.3.3.1, Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation, 3/4.3.3.2, Instrumentation - Incore Detectors & 3/4.3.3.9, Instrumentation - Waste Gas Sys Oxygen Monitor ML20210G5391999-07-26026 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Implementation of 10CFR50,App J, Option B for Type B & C Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML20195F9351999-06-10010 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3/4.6.4.4, Hydrogen Purge Sys, TS 3/4.6.5.1, Shield Bldg Emergency Ventilation Sys & TS 3/4.6.5.1, Crevs ML20207E7941999-05-21021 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Use of Expanded Spent Fuel Storage Capability ML20205E5031999-03-19019 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Withdrawing Proposed New Action B, Previously Submitted in 981027 Application ML20204F1821999-03-0909 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Adopting Changes in Frequency & Scope of Volumetric & Surface Exams Justified by W TR WCAP-14535A ML20155E3231998-10-28028 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Various Sections of 6.0, Administrative Controls, Including Relocation of 6.11 Contents to Plant Ufsar,Per NUREG-1430,Rev 1 ML20155E4971998-10-28028 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.0.2 Re Applicability of 25% Surveillance Interval Extension Allowance ML20155D7791998-10-27027 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating TS SR 4.6.5.1.d.4 Re Evs Negative Pressure Testing to TS 3/4.6.5.2,deleting TS Definition 1.24 & Making Related Changes Associated with Deletion of Subject Definition ML20155E0721998-10-27027 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising 3/4.3.1.1 Re RPS Instrumentation & 3/4.3.2.3 Re ARTS Instrumentation,To Provide Potential Reduction in Spurious Trip Rate for Potential Cost Savings in Excess of $50,000 ML20155D8521998-10-27027 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SRs 4.8.2.3.2.d,4.8.2.3.2.e, 4.8.2.3.2.f & Table 4.8-1 Re Testing of 125 Volt DC Station Batteries & Applicable TS Bases ML20151W2991998-09-0808 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Section 3/4.7.6, Plant Systems - CREVS & Associated Bases ML20151W3071998-09-0808 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Permitting Use of Framatome Cogema Fuels M5 Advanced Alloy for Fuel Rod Cladding & Fuel Assembly Spacer Grids ML20217P8351998-04-24024 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Clarifying Discussion of Margin Between RPS High Pressure Trip Setpoint & Lift Setting for Pressurizer Code Safety Valves ML20217P8811998-04-24024 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.3.1.1,3/4.3.2.1,3/4.3.2.2 & Associated Bases Relocating Tables of Response Time Limits to Plant USAR Technical Requirements Manual ML20217C4881998-03-20020 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs SR 4.4.5.3.c.1,providing Greater Specificity as to Location of Addl Insps in Unaffected SG ML20217N4471998-02-27027 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Provided to Modify Proposed New Action 3.7.6.1.b to Make More Consistent w/NUREG-1431 ML20203L1111998-02-26026 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Amend to License NPF-3 Involving Incorporation of New Repair Roll Process for SG Tubes W/Defects in Upper Tube Sheet ML20197J2621997-12-23023 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Changes to TS Definition 1.2, TS 3/4/9.5 & New TS 3.0.6 & Associated Bases.Ts Index Rev to Reflect Change to TS 3/4.9.5,included ML20197J5971997-12-23023 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS Surveillance Requirements for ISI Requirements of Internal Auxiliary Feedwater Header,Header to Shroud Attachment Welds & External Header Thermal Sleeves ML20217R2821997-08-26026 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying LCO 3.6.1.3.a & Revising Surveillance Requirement 4.6.1.3.c ML20217R2871997-08-26026 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying TS 3.2.5 Action Statement to Require Power Reduction to Less than 5% of Rated Thermal Power within Four Hrs If RCS Flow Rate Is Less than Specified Limit for Greater than Two Hrs ML20217G5981997-07-29029 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.4.3 Re Safety Valves & Pilot Operated Relief valve-operating ML20141F1101997-06-24024 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Requirements for Safety Features Actuation Sys Containment High Radiation Monitors ML20138C3261997-04-18018 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.6 Revising Limiting Condition for Operation to Include New Required Actions in Event That One or Both Channels of Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation Becomes Inoperable ML20138A6891997-04-18018 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.5.3.2.1 & 3/4.5.2 Modifying Presently Specified 18-month Surveillance Frequencies to New Specified Frequencies of Once Each 24-months ML20138M1281997-02-14014 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.5.2 Re Emergency Core Cooling Systems & 4.5.2.f Re Surveillance Requirements ML20134L0561997-02-13013 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Changes Made Concerning Decay Heat Removal Sys Valve ML20134D7621997-01-30030 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SR Intervals from 18 to 24 Months Based on Results of DBNPS Instrument Drift Study & TS 2.2, Limiting Safety Sys Settings, Based on Results of Revised Framatome RPS Instrument String Error ML20134F1811997-01-30030 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Possession & Use of SNM as Reactor Fuel ML20134B0591997-01-20020 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.5.3 Re ECCS Subsystems ML20132B7031996-12-11011 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising TS Definitions,Instrumentation TS & ECCS TS for Conversion to 24 Month Fuel Cycle for License NPF-3 ML20134F1891996-10-28028 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8 Re Electrical Power Systems ML20117P5311996-09-17017 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Supporting Conversion of DBNPS from 18 Month to 24 Month Fuel Cycle ML20117N8531996-09-12012 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactivity Control Systems & Emergency Core Cooling Systems ML20117M2201996-09-0404 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 6.2.3,removing Specific Overtime Limits & Working Hours ML20116K2631996-08-0707 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Definitions,Applicability Bases, Containment Spray Sys & Containment Isolation Valve for Conversion to 24 Month Fuel Cycle ML20117K1911996-05-28028 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.3.1.1 - RPS Instrumentation & TS 3/4.3.2.3 - Anticipatory RTS Instrumentation Increasing Trip Device Test Interval ML20101M1921996-03-29029 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.6.4.4 - HPS,3/4.6.5.1 - Shield Building Evs & 3.4.7.6.1 - CREVS Re Changing Surveillance Requirements for Charcoal Filter Lab Testing to Revise Methodology Used to Determine Operability in ESF AHUs ML20101C6961996-03-0606 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Deferment of SR 4.5.2.b for ECCS Flowpath Containing HPI Pump 1-2 Until 10th Refueling Outage,Scheduled to Begin 960408 ML20100E0101996-02-0505 February 1996 Proposed TS 3/4.3.2.1,Table 3.3-3,safety Features Actuation Sys Instrumentation,Reflecting Design & Actuation Logic of Plant Sequencers & Essential Bus Undervoltage Relays ML20095F5891995-12-12012 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Containment Sys ML20094D0611995-10-31031 October 1995 Proposed TS Page 6-18,deleting TS 6.9.2.d, Seismic Event Analysis ML20098C5181995-10-0202 October 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS Section 5.0,design Features & Adopting Improved STS for B&W Plants Format & Content ML20098C4111995-09-29029 September 1995 Proposed TS 3/4.1.2.8 Re Reactivity Control Sys - Borated Water Sources - Shutdown TS 3/4.1.2.8 Re Reactivity Control Sys - Operating & TS 3/4.5.1 Re ECCS - Core Flooding Tanks ML20098C1121995-09-29029 September 1995 Proposed TS 3.4.3 & Associated Bases,Modifying Lift Setting of Pressurizer Code Safety Valves to Greater than or Equal to 2,575 Psig,Corresponding to Lift Setting Tolerance of +3% of Nominal Lift Pressure 1999-09-07
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20216E6111999-09-0707 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.3.2.1 Re Safety Features Actuation Sys Instrumentation & Associated Bases ML20210H0731999-07-28028 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.5.1, Ultimate Heat Sink, Allowing Plant Operation in Modes 1-4 with Water Temp Less than or Equal to 90 F ML20210G4311999-07-27027 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing TSs 6.4, Training, 6.5.2.8, Audits, 6.10, Record Retention, 6.14, Process Control Program & 6.15, Odcm ML20210G4801999-07-26026 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.3.2.1 Re Safety Features Actuation Sys Instrumentation & Associated Bases ML20210G9161999-07-26026 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.3.3.1, Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation, 3/4.3.3.2, Instrumentation - Incore Detectors & 3/4.3.3.9, Instrumentation - Waste Gas Sys Oxygen Monitor ML20210G5391999-07-26026 July 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Re Implementation of 10CFR50,App J, Option B for Type B & C Containment Leakage Rate Testing ML20195F9351999-06-10010 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising TS 3/4.6.4.4, Hydrogen Purge Sys, TS 3/4.6.5.1, Shield Bldg Emergency Ventilation Sys & TS 3/4.6.5.1, Crevs ML20207E7941999-05-21021 May 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Allowing Use of Expanded Spent Fuel Storage Capability ML20205E5031999-03-19019 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Withdrawing Proposed New Action B, Previously Submitted in 981027 Application ML20204F1821999-03-0909 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Adopting Changes in Frequency & Scope of Volumetric & Surface Exams Justified by W TR WCAP-14535A ML20155E4971998-10-28028 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 4.0.2 Re Applicability of 25% Surveillance Interval Extension Allowance ML20197G5521998-10-28028 October 1998 Rev 8 to Dbnps,Unit 1 Technical Requirements Manual ML20155E3231998-10-28028 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Various Sections of 6.0, Administrative Controls, Including Relocation of 6.11 Contents to Plant Ufsar,Per NUREG-1430,Rev 1 ML20155D7791998-10-27027 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Relocating TS SR 4.6.5.1.d.4 Re Evs Negative Pressure Testing to TS 3/4.6.5.2,deleting TS Definition 1.24 & Making Related Changes Associated with Deletion of Subject Definition ML20155D8521998-10-27027 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SRs 4.8.2.3.2.d,4.8.2.3.2.e, 4.8.2.3.2.f & Table 4.8-1 Re Testing of 125 Volt DC Station Batteries & Applicable TS Bases ML20155E0721998-10-27027 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising 3/4.3.1.1 Re RPS Instrumentation & 3/4.3.2.3 Re ARTS Instrumentation,To Provide Potential Reduction in Spurious Trip Rate for Potential Cost Savings in Excess of $50,000 ML20151W3071998-09-0808 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Permitting Use of Framatome Cogema Fuels M5 Advanced Alloy for Fuel Rod Cladding & Fuel Assembly Spacer Grids ML20151W2991998-09-0808 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Section 3/4.7.6, Plant Systems - CREVS & Associated Bases ML20206D2721998-08-28028 August 1998 Rev 11,change 1 to Odcm ML20217P8351998-04-24024 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Clarifying Discussion of Margin Between RPS High Pressure Trip Setpoint & Lift Setting for Pressurizer Code Safety Valves ML20217P8811998-04-24024 April 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.3.1.1,3/4.3.2.1,3/4.3.2.2 & Associated Bases Relocating Tables of Response Time Limits to Plant USAR Technical Requirements Manual ML20217C4881998-03-20020 March 1998 Proposed Tech Specs SR 4.4.5.3.c.1,providing Greater Specificity as to Location of Addl Insps in Unaffected SG ML20217N4471998-02-27027 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Provided to Modify Proposed New Action 3.7.6.1.b to Make More Consistent w/NUREG-1431 ML20203L1111998-02-26026 February 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Amend to License NPF-3 Involving Incorporation of New Repair Roll Process for SG Tubes W/Defects in Upper Tube Sheet ML20197J2621997-12-23023 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages Re Changes to TS Definition 1.2, TS 3/4/9.5 & New TS 3.0.6 & Associated Bases.Ts Index Rev to Reflect Change to TS 3/4.9.5,included ML20197J5971997-12-23023 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Revising TS Surveillance Requirements for ISI Requirements of Internal Auxiliary Feedwater Header,Header to Shroud Attachment Welds & External Header Thermal Sleeves ML20217M5601997-09-0505 September 1997 Rev 11.0 to Davis-Besse Odcm ML20217R2821997-08-26026 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying LCO 3.6.1.3.a & Revising Surveillance Requirement 4.6.1.3.c ML20217R2871997-08-26026 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Modifying TS 3.2.5 Action Statement to Require Power Reduction to Less than 5% of Rated Thermal Power within Four Hrs If RCS Flow Rate Is Less than Specified Limit for Greater than Two Hrs ML20217G5981997-07-29029 July 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.4.3 Re Safety Valves & Pilot Operated Relief valve-operating ML20141F1101997-06-24024 June 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting Requirements for Safety Features Actuation Sys Containment High Radiation Monitors ML20138C3261997-04-18018 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.7.6 Revising Limiting Condition for Operation to Include New Required Actions in Event That One or Both Channels of Radiation Monitoring Instrumentation Becomes Inoperable ML20138A6891997-04-18018 April 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.5.3.2.1 & 3/4.5.2 Modifying Presently Specified 18-month Surveillance Frequencies to New Specified Frequencies of Once Each 24-months ML20140D9481997-04-0909 April 1997 ODCM, Rev 10 ML20138M1281997-02-14014 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.5.2 Re Emergency Core Cooling Systems & 4.5.2.f Re Surveillance Requirements ML20134L0561997-02-13013 February 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Changes Made Concerning Decay Heat Removal Sys Valve ML20134F1811997-01-30030 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Possession & Use of SNM as Reactor Fuel ML20134D7621997-01-30030 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Revising SR Intervals from 18 to 24 Months Based on Results of DBNPS Instrument Drift Study & TS 2.2, Limiting Safety Sys Settings, Based on Results of Revised Framatome RPS Instrument String Error ML20134B0591997-01-20020 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.5.3 Re ECCS Subsystems ML20132B7031996-12-11011 December 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Revising TS Definitions,Instrumentation TS & ECCS TS for Conversion to 24 Month Fuel Cycle for License NPF-3 ML20134F1891996-10-28028 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.8 Re Electrical Power Systems ML20117P5311996-09-17017 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Supporting Conversion of DBNPS from 18 Month to 24 Month Fuel Cycle ML20117N8531996-09-12012 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactivity Control Systems & Emergency Core Cooling Systems ML20117M2201996-09-0404 September 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 6.2.3,removing Specific Overtime Limits & Working Hours ML20116K2631996-08-0707 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Definitions,Applicability Bases, Containment Spray Sys & Containment Isolation Valve for Conversion to 24 Month Fuel Cycle ML20117K1911996-05-28028 May 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.3.1.1 - RPS Instrumentation & TS 3/4.3.2.3 - Anticipatory RTS Instrumentation Increasing Trip Device Test Interval ML20101M1921996-03-29029 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 3/4.6.4.4 - HPS,3/4.6.5.1 - Shield Building Evs & 3.4.7.6.1 - CREVS Re Changing Surveillance Requirements for Charcoal Filter Lab Testing to Revise Methodology Used to Determine Operability in ESF AHUs ML20101C6961996-03-0606 March 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Deferment of SR 4.5.2.b for ECCS Flowpath Containing HPI Pump 1-2 Until 10th Refueling Outage,Scheduled to Begin 960408 ML20100E0101996-02-0505 February 1996 Proposed TS 3/4.3.2.1,Table 3.3-3,safety Features Actuation Sys Instrumentation,Reflecting Design & Actuation Logic of Plant Sequencers & Essential Bus Undervoltage Relays ML20107C3101995-12-21021 December 1995 Rev 9 to Odcm 1999-09-07
[Table view] |
Text
__ . _ _
Docket Mumber So.346' '? $ !
1,1( enea Numb 1r NFF-S ^
j ] % ); jN,I , ahw .
h* '
l $5ti:1 Number 175o , gyg aqp{
nt 3 ' REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS a ttcc 3/_4.1. 3 MOVABLE CONTROL ASSEMBLIES GROUP HEIGHT - SAFETY AND REGULATING R00 GROUPS LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATIONS !
3.1.3.1 All control (safety and regulating) rods shall be OPERABLE and i
positioned within ,+ 6.5% (indicated position) of their group average height. :
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1* and 2*,
ACTION:
t
- a. With one or more control rods inoperable due to being immovable as a result of excessive friction or mechanical interference or ,
known to be untrippable, determine that the SHUTDOWN MARGIN '
requirement of Specification 3.1.1.1 is satisfied within one hour and be in at least HOT STANDlY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. ;
- b. With more than one control rod inoperable or misaligned from its group average height by more than + 6.5% (indicated '
position), be in at least NOT STANDBY within 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />,
- c. With one control rod inoperable due to causes other than i addressed by ACTION a, above, or misaligned from its group average height by more than + 6.51 (indicated position), POWER OPERATION may continue proviied that within one hour either:
- 1. The control rod is restored to OPERABLE status within the above alignment requirements, or ,
- 2. The control rod is declared inoperable and the SHUTDOWN MARGIN requirement of Specification 3.1.1.1 is. satisfied.
POWER OPERATION may then continue provided that:
a) An analysis of the potential ejected rod worth is [
L performed within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> and the rod worth is deter-l mined to be < 1.05 Ak at zero power and < 0.65%
ak at RATED THERMAL POWER for the remainTer of the fuel cycle.
l b) The SHUTDOWN MARGIN requirement of Specification 3.1.1.1 is determined at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
~
- 5ee Special Test Exceptions 3.10.1 and 3.10.2.
DAVIS-BESSE, UNIT 1 3/4 1-19 9002130369 900201 b ADOCK 0500 6 ,
pDR
t Dockot Cumber 50-SM ,
,' Licens3 Number
$3 rig 1 Number 1750NPF-3 i
{
Attachment 3 i Page 2
{
REACTIVITY CONTROL' SYSTEM 5 l
ACTION: (Continued) i e) A power distributiga map is obtained from the intere !
detectors and F0 F"gare verified to be within their limits !
within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. ,
t Either the TEIRMAL p0VER level is reduced to < 605 of the t MMAL POVER allovable ior the restter ecolant pump l
.atnation within one hour and within the neat 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> the i eign Flux Trip setpoint is reduced to < 705 of the TERRMAL '
Pov3:R allowable for, the reactor coolant pump combination, or l t
e) The remainder of the rods in the group with the inoperable rod are aligned to within 6.3% of the inoperable rod within ,
i one hour while maintaining the rod sequence, insertion and -i overlap limits of Figure 3.1-2 and 3.1-31 the TEIRNAL 70VER t level shall be restricted pursuant to Specification 3.1.3.6 :'
during subsequent operation.
(
StFIRILLANCE REQUIREMENTS
~
i 4.1.3.1.1 The position of each control rod shall be determined to be within the !
group average height limit by verifying the individual rod positions at least -
once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> except during time intervals when the Asymmeeete-7 f 7 ' !
e individual rod position (s) o th 7 1 tg Ct.;;;;ri is inoperable rod (s), vit operabl .. g;;;.try, t least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />. ,
ks metse wtm.% aZ: ,,gyl-4.1 3.1.2 control r not u y inserted shall be determined to ' - - -
OPERABLE by movement of at least 22 in any one direction at least once every 31 days.
i I
DAVIS-8 ESSE, UNIT 1 3/4 1-20 Amendment No.135
\
' Dock;t Cumb?r 50-346
. Lic:ns? Numb:r NPF-3 ;
l Serial Number 1750 Attachment 3 Page 3 J
REACTIVITYCONTROLSYSTEMj, l
J GROUP HEIGHT - AXIAL POWER SHAPING ROD GROUP LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION !
3.1.3.2 All axial power shaping rods (APSR) shall be OPERABLE, unless fully withdrawn, and shall be positioned within + 6.5% (indicated ~
position) of their group average height. '
APPLICABILITY: MODES 1* and 2*.
l ACTION: I With a maximum of one APSR inoperable or misaligned from its group average height by more than + 6.5% (indicated position), operation may i continue provided that withiii 2 hour2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />s:
- a. The APSR group is positioned such that the misaligned rod is' ,
restored to within limits for the group average height, or
- b. It is determined that the imbalance limits of Specification 3.2.1 are satisfied and movement of the APSR group is pre- .
vented while th6 rod remains inoperable or misaligned. :
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS r
4.1.3.2.1 The position of each APSR rod shall be determined to be i within the group average height limit by verifying the individual rod posi 1 er urs except during time intervals when the - . . . .. ... is inoperable, then vertfr _ ndi- ;
vidua ro pos ion s o e ro s), wit
at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, g .g Mv*me% wapa..
4.1.3.2.2 Unless all APSR are fully withdrawn, the APSR shall be determined to be OPERABLE by moving the APSR rods at least 2% at least once every 31 days.
- See Special Test Exceptions 3.10.1 and 3.10.2. '
i
(
DAVIS-BESSE, UNIT'l 3/4 1-21 l
f i
~
,. . f i' poc';tk Numb 2r 50 346 l t,1 con.e yumber HPF-3 j
. serial Number 1750 Attachment 3 Page 4 i l
REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS 1 I
POSITION INDICATOR CHANNELS
]
LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPEPATION i
3.1.3.3 All safety, regulating and axial power shaping control rod f absolute position indicator channels and relative position indicator '
channels shall be OPERABLE and capable of determining the control rog 3mp .
positions within + , averay APPLICABILITY _: MODES 1 and 2. l ACTION:
- a. With a maximum of one absolute position indicator channel per ;
control rod group or one relative position indicator channel i per control rod group inoperable either:
- 1. Reduce THERMAL POWER to < 60% of the THERMAL POWER allow-able for the reactor cooTant pump combination and reduce-the High Flux Trip Setpoint to < 70% of the THERMAL POWER allowable for the reactor coolan,,t pump combination within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />, or
- 2. Operation may continue provided: ,
a) The position of the control rod with the inoperable position indicator is verified within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> by actuating its 0%, 25%, 50% 75% or, 100% position reference indicator, and 4
b) The control rod group (s) containing the inoperable position indicator channel is subsequently maintained '
at the 0%, 25%, 50%, 75% or,100% withdrawn position and verified at this position at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> thereafter, and c) Operation is within the limits of Specification 3.1.3.6. .
- b. With more than one .___ m ,. position indicator channel inoperable, operation in MODES 1 and 2 may continue for up to 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />' provided all of th - ' " ' ": position indicator channels are OPERABLE.
DAVIS-BESSE,. UNIT 1 3/4 1-22
l 4 ' 5
- 1. ., .
i Dock;t Number 50-346 t License Number NPF 3 -l Serial Number 1750
'l Attachment 3 Page 5 I
REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS ,
t POSITION INDICATOR CHANNELS (Continued)
SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS i
4.1.3.3 Each absolute and relative position indicator channel shall be determined to be OPERABLE by verifying th6t the relative position indic channels and the absolute position indicator channels agree within 6ft' at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> except during time intervals when the -
at:-:;\,
R;d F:;1t Circuitry is inoperable, then compare the relative position indicator and absolute position indicator channel (s) of the rod (s) with operable c ' "' + ri--"itr/ at least once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br />, r me ,h,.
1 i
9 1
DAVIS-BESSE, UNIT 1 3/4 1-23 l
Dock;t Number 50 346
)
, . Lied 3 Cumber NPF-3 ,7
- 9) p p .,n g
$3 rial Numb 3r 1750 1 KJ p { . i i )) U' E. .U )L 8 Attachment 3 Page 6 g is ,
d ,
j[II l
REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS $f '
. i L , e f 1
BASES '
l 3/4.1.2 BORATION SYSTEMS (Continued) !
stable reactivity condition of the reactor and the additional l restrictions prohibiting CORE ALTERATIONS and positive reactivity change 1 in the event the single injection system becomes inoperable.
The boron capability required belov 200'F is sufficient to prnvide a !
SHUTDOVN MARGIN of 1% Ak/k after xenon decay and cooldown from 200'F to 70'F. This condition requires either 600 gallons of 7875 ppm borated ^
vater from the boric acid storage system or 3,000 gallons of 1800 ppe borated water from the borated water storage tank.
The bottom 4 inches of the borated water storage tank are not available, and the instrumentation is calibrated to reflect the available volume.
All boric acid tank volume is available. The limits on vater volume, and boron concentration ensure a pH value of between 7.0 and 11.0 of the solution recirculated within containment after a design basis accident. ,
The pH band minimises the evolution of iodine and ainimizes the effect of chloride and caustic stress corrosion cracking on mechanical systems and components.
The OPERABILITY'of one boron injection system during REFUELING ensures that this system is available for reactivity control while in MODE 6.
3/4.1.3 MOVAELE CONTROL ASSEMBLIES
- The specifications of this section (1) ensure that acceptable power distribution limits are maintained, (2) ensure that the minimum SHUTD0VN MARGIN is maintained, and (3) limit the potential effects of a rod ejection accident. OPERABILITY of the control rod position indicators is required to determine control rod pcsitions and thereby ensure compliance with the control rod alignment and insertion limits.
The ACTION statements which permit limited variations from the basic ,
requirements are accompanied by additional restrictions which ensure that the original criteria are met. For example, misalignment of a safety or regulating rod requires a restriction in THERMAL POVER. The reactivity vorth of a misaligned rod is limited for the remainder of the fuel cycle to prevent exceeding the assumptions used in the safety analysis.
The position of a rod declared inoperable due to misalignment should not be included in computing the average group position for determining the OPERABILITY of rods with lesser misalignments.
DAVIS-BESSE, UNIT 1 B 3/4 1-3 Amendment No.123
. L . -. - .
i Dock;t Numb 3r 50 346
- i Licens3 Numb 3r NPF-3 !
Attachment 3 Page 7 l REACT!'.*!"T CONTROL SYSTD!S BASES r .
l 3/4.1.3. MOVABLE CONTROL ASSEMBLIES (Continued)
The maximum rod drop time permitted is consistent with the assumed rod drop time used in the saiety analyses. Massurement with Tavs a 325'T and with re- ;
actor coolant pumps operating ensures that- the measured drop times will be representative of insertion times experienced during a reactor trip at operat- i ing conditions.
Control rod positions and OPERABILITY of the rod position indicators are re- -
quired to be verified on a nominal basis of once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> with frequent verifications required if an automatic monitoring channel is inoperable. These ,
verification fr are adequate for assuring that the applicable LCO's ,
are satisfied. n sat,A--_ ,
Technical Specification 3.1.3.8 provides the ability to prevent excessive ,
power peaking by transient xenon at RATED THERMAL POWER. Operating restrie- L tions resulting frem transient xenon power peaking, including xenon-f ree startup, are inherently included in the limits of Sections 3.1.3.6 (Regulat-ing Rod Insertion Limits) 3.1.3.9 (Axial Power Shaping Rod Insertion Limits),
and 3.2.1 (Axial Power Imbalance) for transient peaking behavior bounded by the following factors. For the period of cycle operation where regulating rod groups 6 and 7 are allowed to be inserted at RATED THERMAL POWER, an 8%
peaking increase is applied at or above 92177. An 18% increase is applied below 92: FF. For operation where only regulating rod group 7 is allowed to ,
be inserted at RATED THERMAL POWER, a 5% peaking increase is applied at or above 92% T7 and a 13 increase is applied below 92: TP.
If these values, checksd every cycle, conservatively bound the peaking sf fects -
of all transient xen6n, than the need for any hold at a power level cutof f be-low RATED THERMAL POWER is precluded. If not, either the power level at which the requirements of Section 3.1.3.8 must be satisfied or the above-listed f ac-tors vill be suitably adjusted to preserve the LOCA linear heat rate limits.
The li=1tation on axial ' power ' shaping red insertion is necessary to ensure that power peaking limits are not exceeded.
6 DAVIS-BESSE. UNIT 1 B 3/4 1-4 Amendment No. M ,45 1
i i
,, kocktNumber$0346
"; Lic :co Number NPF 3 ;
Serial Number 1750 j Attachment 3 J Page 8 '
INSERT A A 1.5% group average position uncertainty is applied to the rod index curves, i Therefore, the position indicators must be capable of supporting this accuracy. The Surveillance Requirement ensures this accuracy by keeping the RPI calibrated to a "knovn" position as indicated by the API. Using the API as a "known" position is valid provided two consecutive reed switched are not inoperable. Having one entire string, (1. e., every other reed switch) inoperable is acceptable.
A specific surveillance of the reed switches is not required because:
- 1) When one or more reed switch fails closed a large API indication of asymmetry occurs.
- 2) Two failed open reed switches in series result in a large indication of asymmetry.
- 3) Failed open reed switches not in series (up to every other switch) are bounded by the analysis.
Therefore, a reed switch condition not bounded by the analysis vill be indicated by API system asymmetry indications.
I t
4