ML20006A576

Advises That Individual Plant Exam Approach & Methodology, Described in ,Per Generic Ltr 88-20,acceptable. Schedule Changes Should Be Reported to NRC

ML20006A576
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	01/18/1990
From:	Stang J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Sylvia B DETROIT EDISON CO.
References
GL-88-20, TAC-74410, NUDOCS 9001290131
Download: ML20006A576 (3)

Text

3-m yy -

j

?

1 t.

g n. r',, 3.. ; e

-D I1.

DISTRIBUTION "M

Do,cket No. 50-341' Y(

LUDCKETf4E;T ACRS(10)- --

'NRC & LOCAL-PORs PSHUTTLEWORTH PD31 R/F-JZWOLINSKI-

[

OGC-

~EJORDAN.

"I 6

Mr. ' B. : Ralph Sylvia-JSTANG

.MB0YLE Senior'Vice President - Nuclear JFLACK E

Operations:

1 Detrolt-Edison l Company 1

6400' North Dixie' Highway ~

Newport, Michigani 48166 n

Dear Mr. SylVi$i t

'~

4

SUBJECT:

REVIEW 0F 60-DAY RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER.88-20, INDIVIDUAL e>-

t f, i'

, PLANT EXAMINATIONS-(IPE) (TAC NO. 74410)'

8,

+

r t Re:

w Fermi-2; Facility' e: + +

1'

' Generic Letter 88-20> requires, 'in part, that 'each operating reactor licensee.

c4-W ' -and construction p'e'rmit.holderi i (1) identify the approach and method selected 1

for performing the'IPE, (2) ' describe the method to be used, and (3) identify 1

the. schedule, for performing the IPE and submitting the results to' the NRC.

-This-information was to be submitted to the NRC within 60 days of issuance of-Supplement 1 of,the generic letter.

l

[

.We havelreviewed_your letter. dated October 25, 1989, submitted in response to the reporting requirements of the' gen'eric letter.

We conclude that your IPE approach,'~ methodology, and schedule are acceptable. We anticipate that'any possible additional analysis or reporting requirements, such as those from

-external _ events or from the Containment' Performance Improvement Program', will

o not have any adverse.effect on your schedule..However, if your schedule should

(

t change, please: notify the NRC of the proposed change _and the reason for the-

= change.

Should!you-have any questions concerning the requirements-of the generic' letter,

~

please contact Mr. Michael L. Boyle, NRR.at'(301) 492-1308 or Mr. John H. Flack,

_RES at-(301) 492-3979.

t Sincerely, y,w p -

John F. Stang, Project Manager Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V & Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc: LSee next page LA/PD31:DRSPg/>(J,

J PM/1 31: DRSP D31:DRSP PSHUTTLEWORTH 1/fj/90-1 y 90 1/lf/90 FERMI IPE ACCEPTANCE LETTER 9001290131 900118 ggl l

PDR ADOCK 05000341

m

, ; Q [ [" p p o g -.

[-

- d lo UNITED $TATES g

[

g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -

b'}

g

*t WASHINGTON, D. C. 20656 e

9 January 18, 1990 4.,...../

Docket No. 50-341 Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia Senior Vice President - Nuclear Operations

+

. Detroit Edison Company 6400. North Dixie Highway Newport, Michigan 48166

~

SUBJECT:

REVIEW 0F 60-DAY RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 88-20, INDIVIDUAL PLANT. EXAMINATIONS (IPE) (TAC NO. 74410)

Re:-

Fermi-2 Facility Generic Letter 88-20 requires, in part, that each operating reactor' licensee and construction permit holder:

(1) identify the approach and method selected for performing the IPE, (2) describe the method to be used, and (3) identify the schedule for performing the IPE and submitting the results to the NRC..

This information was to be submitted to the NRC within 60 days of issuance of Supplement 1 of the' generic letter.

We have reviewed your letter dated October 25, 1989, submitted in. response to the reporting requirements of.the generic letter.

We conclude that your IPE i'

approach, methodology, and schedule are acceptable.

We anticipate that any possible additional analysis or reporting requirements, such as those frem external events or from the Containment Performance: Improvement Program, will

_not have any adverse effect on your schedule.-

However, if yourz schedule should

-change, please notify the NRC of the proposed change ant the' reason for the change.

Should you have any questions concerning the requirements of the generic letter, please contact'Mr. Michael L. Boyle, NRR at (301) 492-1308 or.Mr. John H. Flack, RES at (301) 492-3979.

l i

Sincerely, j

1 1

1 John F. Stang, Project Manager l

Project Directorate III-1 Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V & Special Projects Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation cc:

See next page

,b m

p

• j... t,-

1 Mr. B. Ralph Sylvia Fermi-2 facility 1

.: Detroit Edison Company _

'cc:

Mr. Ronald C. Callen

. Ms. Lynn Goodman Adv. Planning Review Section Supervisor - Licensing

- Michigan Public Service Connission Detroit Edison Company 6545 Mercantile Way Fermi Unit 2-P. 0.. Box 30221 6400 North Dixie Highway Lansing, Michigan.' 48909 Newport, Michigan 48166~

John Flynn, Esq.

Senior Attorney

. Detroit Edison Company 2000 Second Avenue

- Detroit, Michigan 48226

. Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section Office Division of Radiological Health P. O. Box 30035-Lansing, Michigan 48909 a

Mr. Walt Rogers U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Connissir.n Resident Inspector's Office 6450'W. Dixie Highway-Newport, Michigan 48166 Honroe County Office of Civil Preparedness -

E

. 963 South Raisinville-Monroe, Michigan 48161 L~

- Regional Administrator, Region III l

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission L

799 Roosevelt Rcad Glen Ellyn Illinois 60137 l.

l.

}-

2 e

ww r"e*7W-"""

Tv-v

'*"*"vW'*=P'-d*7**' " " " ' " ' " "mW tr"'-

m*'P'ar e

+ean-a' es-e e e-M=m-a gr

=

=A-------

--