ML20005E039
| ML20005E039 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 12/01/1989 |
| From: | HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20005E029 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9001030156 | |
| Download: ML20005E039 (46) | |
Text
.-
Addendum 5
L
[Contro-l R:oom Desi;gn Etestew l
Executi/ve Summary
,,. =,,
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY
' HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM i(j jnH DESIGN-REVIEW G
POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
REVISION IDG
}
Revision Pages No.
Date Description Affected 0
01/30/84 Initial Issue Addendum 04/15/85 Provided Current 5-1,2,3 No. 1 Schedule Section 5.0 Addendum 12/22/86 Addendum Describing
.N/A No. 2 Results of Activities Between 04/15/85 and 12/22/86 Addendum 11/23/87 Addendum Describing N/A No. 3 Results-of Activities Between 12/22/86 and 11/23/87 1,
Addendum 09/30/88 Addendum Describing N/A No. 4 Results of Activities Between 11/23/87 and 09/30/88 Addendum 12/01/89 Addendum Describing N/A No. 5 Results of Activities Between 09/30/88 and 12/01/89 L
L t
. s i
WM 12/01/89
4 f
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM -
Q j'0HMG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5_
}
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section-111;11 f.A&R REVISION IDG i
TABLE OF CONTENTS 11 LIST OF TABLES iii LIST 0F FIGURED iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS v
SUMMARY
vi PREFACE vii
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1-1 O
2.0 METHOD 01hGY AND RESULTS 2-1 2.1 METHOD 01DGY 21 2.2 RESULTS
-2 2 5,0 SCHEDULE 5-1 I
O 11 MW9d 12/01/89
i
,I HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
! ~) - l UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW v
a POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
i ADDENDUM 5 t
TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES j
Table Title Eagg 2-1
SUMMARY
OF STATUS: CONTROL ROOM 24 PIANNED ACTIVITY EVALUATIONS I
1 2-2
SUMMARY
OF STATUS: ASP ROOM 2-5 PIANNED ACTIVITY EVALUATIONS 23 NEW HEDs 2-6
_(
2-4 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS:
2-7 CONTROL ROOM - WORRSPACE.
2-5 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS:
2-8 CONTROL ROOM - COMMUNICATIONS 2-6 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS:
2-9 i.
CONTROL ROOM - VISUAL DISPIAYS 27 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS:
2-10 CONTROL ROOM - COMPUTERS 2-8 PREVIOUSLY CATEGORIZED DEFERRED ITEMS -
2-11 VISUAL DISPIAYS 2-9 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS:
2-12 ASP ROOM - WORKSPACE 2-10 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS:
2-13 ASP ROOM - COMMUNICATIONS 2-11 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS:
2-14 ASP ROOM - VISUAL DISPIAYS 2-12 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS:
2-15 ASP ROOM - COMPUTERS O
. %$A 12/01/89
r i
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM Q
j'0HTING DESIGN REVIEW Powan co.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
-ADDENDUM 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS a
LIST OF FIGURES Firure Title
/
P 1.
STP CRDR MAJOR REPORTS 21 REFERENCE / COMMENT FORM 2 2.
HE0 ASSESSMENT FORM
)
2-3
-HED ASSESSMENT FACTOR CRITERIA O
O iv 1$199d ~
12/01/89
D POWER CO.
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM ~
(
lOHTING DESIGN REVIEW EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM S ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS l
ASP Auxiliary Shutdown Panel CRDR Control Room Design Review CRS Control Room Survey E0P Emergency Operating Procedure (s)
ERFDADS Emergency Response Facilities Data Acquisition and Display System ESF Engineered Safety Features HED Human Engineering Discrepancy HE0 Human Engineering Observation H14P Houston Lighting & Power Company NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission OER Operating Experience Review SFTA System Functi6n & Task Analysis STP South Texas Project 4
i O
1sW94 12/01/89
e e
' HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM f~
L'0HTING DESIGN REVIEW o
a A ~
POWER CO.
i EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM S
SUMMARY
)
This addendum summarizes the results of the South Texas Project (STP) Control-Room Design Review (CRDR) activities since issuance of Addendum 4 (dated September 30, 1988) to the Executive Summary.
The activities during this time period have been the following:
A.
Evaluations against Category E deferred criteria for the control rooms and auxiliary shutdown panel rooms of Unit 1 and Unit 2 B.
Extensive review, problem identification and problem resolution by J
D(3
~
l the Annunciator Task Force C.
Computer display reviews for the Safety Parameter Display System
,l D.
Miscellaneous CRDR human factors work, including review of HED resolutions and implementation, and categorization of new human engineering observations r
This addendum summarizes the methodology and results of these efforts and provides an updated schedule for completion of the remaining STP CRDR activities.
As this report is an addendum to the Executive Summary, section numbers of this addendum correspond generally to the section numbers used in the Executive Summary. Thia addendum also uses the same format as Addenda 1 through 4.
O vi 1$W371 12/01/89
i
=
f HOUSTON CCNTROL ROOM
.?
0 j'OHT'NG DESIGN REVIEW l
. POWER CO.
' EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
I ADDENDUM S PREFACE The control room design review (CRDR) of the South Texas Project (STP)
Electric Generating Station was started in September 1982. This review was performed by Torrey Pines Technology for Houston Lighting & Power Company (HIAP) with Bechtel Energy Corporation (Bechtel) acting as agent.
The program plan was presented to the NRC at the STP main control panel mock.
up in October 1982. The basic review work for operator experience review, system function and task analysis, and control room survey was completed in October 1982.
In November 1982 the Management Team put a hold on CRDR j
activities, and authorized a design study to address mounting evolutionary engineering changes and correct discrepancies with the NUREG 0700 guidelines.
In November 1982 a decision was made by HL&P to completely relayout six main control panels and upgrade the remaining four based on the design study. This redesign effort was required to accommodate design changes resulting from plant design evolution and Regulatory Guide 1.97 requirements and to correct discrepancies with NUREG-0700.
In December 1982 the Management Team selected one of five alternatives studied for design implementation.
The mock-up was revised considering the 441 identified HEDs and evolutionary L
engineering changes. As the Bechtel layout engineers advanced the layouts of the ten, panels, Torrey Pines Technology engineers reviewed the rework for correction of known discrepancies and compliance with good human factors principles.
The redesign effort on the main control panels was completed in April 1983. The NRC performed an in-progress audit in May 1983 after which the panel vendor was provided with firm layout drawings.
C vii l
1$ M 40 12/01/89
t houston CONTROL ROOM Q
UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
- s_.
POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5 The NRC audit comments required the addition of several special studies to those already in progress, e.g., demarcation and hisrarchical labeling.
The most significant addition, the evaluation of specified parameters, resulted in a net reduction of 51 panel meters.
The extensive relayout required a repeat of the system function and task analysis with verification and walk-through/ talk thrcugh validation.
Likewise, a specially structured control room review and human factors review of the corrective measures for all t
Category A and representative Category B discrepancies were performed. The demarcation and hierarchical labeling studies resulted in continued upgrading of the mock up.
The completion of the panel relayout allowed the design of the annunciator system consistent with the relocations of many systems and
()
subsystems, and a reduction o'f active windows from 1055 to 642.
Following the completion of these major efforts, HLaP has continued the CRDR program, including resolution of human engineering deficiencies identified, using Bechtel and Torrey Pines Technology as required.
The documentation for this program was necessarily extensive in view of its design development nature.
Documentation describing the work performed during the CRDR is summarized below and in Figure P-1:
1.
Program Plan - Defines the initial plan for performing the CRDR during the plant's construction phase.
2.
Criteria Report - Provides the detailed guidelines and basis for the CRDR and describes the interface between the control room and plant systems. This report also includes review procedurcs, plant conventions, and human factors data developed during the CRDR that I) will facilitate future control room modifications, viii ifff34 12/01/89
~. -
1 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM lGHTING OgglQN ggyjgW POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5 3.
Operating Experience Review (OER) Report Describes the operations personnel review process, results, conclusions, and recommendations of this task defined in the Program Plan.
4 Syst.em Function and Task Analysis (SFTA) Report - Describes the methodology, results, conclusions, and recommendations for this SFTA effort defined in the Program Plan, j
5.
r:ontrol Room Survey (CRS) Report - Describes the review process, cesults, conclusions, and recommendations of this task defined in s
the Program Plan. This report also includes the final results and dispositioits for the human factors observations obtained trom the OER and the SFTA.
6.
Annunciator Report Describes the review process, results, conclusions, and recommendations of the annunciator review task defined in the Program Plan and the annunciator study guide.
7.
Special Studies Report - Describes details of miscellaneo s studies performed as part of the CRDR.
This includes the anthropometric study, the hierarchical labeling study, the l
demarcation study, evaluation of specified parameters, and many l
minor studies to resolve NRC audit comments, j
8.
Implementation Plan Report - Summarizes the control panel design changes resulting from the implementation of Regulatory Guide 1.97 requirements, engineering design requirements, and preliminary observations of the CRDR design review team.
It describes the reasons for major changes to the control panel layouts.
ix MWM 12/01/89 1
\\s.
D UGHMG Houston CONTROL ROOM i
- (^'
DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM $
t 9.
SPTA Validation Report - Summarizes the second review required l
because of the extensive revisions made to the control panel layouts and also includes walk through/ talk through exercises performed in the mock up area, b
i 10.
OER Validation Report Summarizes the review ande by operators to determine if the redesigned panels corrected reported cperator concerns and evaluate if any new problems were created as a result i
of the corrective measures taken.
4 11.
CRS Validation Report Summarizes the review made to determine if
[}
the Category A and representative samples of the Category B HEDs were satisfactorily corrected and if any new problems were created.
12.
Executive Summary Summarizes the CRDR results, conclusions, recommendations, and schedules for remaining work.
Technical details are in the Operating Experience Review Report, the System Function and Task Analysis Report, the Annunciator Report, the Control Room Survey Report, the Special Studies Report, the Implementation Plan Report, and various validation reports, 13.
Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report - Summarizes all Category A, B, C, and D HED resolutions (as of January 1,1986).
14 Executive Summary Addenda Summarize the results and remaining work schedules of the CRDR program following the submittal of the Executive Summary Report. Addendum i showed progress as of April
()
15, 1985; Addendum 2 as of December 22, 1986; Addendum 3 as of t
x ifYP94 12/01/89
t l
nouston CONTROL ROOM Q
fG DESIGN REVIEW 1
POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE SUMKARY ADDENDUM $
November 23, 1987; and Addendum 4 as of September 30, 1988.
Addendum 5 shows progress as of December 1, 1989.
15.
Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP) Validation Report.
Summarizes the validation process used for the Emergency Operating Procedures and the results as they involve the control panels.
This validation was conducted at the STP simulator during May 1986 using the draft E0Ps.
16.
Human Engineering Discrepancy Resolution Report Addenda -
Summarize resolutions for Category A, B, C, and D HEDs identified af ter January 1,1986. Addendum i summarized the HED resolutions as of December 22, 1986; Addendum 2 as of November 23, 1987; and Addendum 3 as of September 30, 1988. Addendum 4 summarizes the HED resolutions as of December 1, 1989.
For clarity, each addendum shows resolutions for HEDs identified after January 1, 1986, thus superseding the previous addendum in its entirety.
17.
Program Plan Addendum. Identifies the STP CRDR Program Plan effective for the plant's operational phase.
O xi 1881Yld 12/01/89
\\
comn ca.
)
L 1
L II l
PLANNING l
j i
1
. MM L
/ -
ali li !!,llIld.lk ~l x
u o
i i
CONTROL ROOM GHousToN
(}
j*
DESIGN REVIEW l
G
== co.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
I t
ADDENDUM $
)
1.0 INTROD11CTION t
This addendum reports the results of activities performed towards the completion of the CRDR of the South Texas Project since Executive Summary Addendum 4,. dated,$eptember 30, 1988.
f Since September 1988, activities related to CRDR on Unit I have been the following:
o Evaluations against Category E deferred criteria for the control room and the auxiliary shutdown panel (ASP) room O
Extensive review, problem identification and problem resolution by
{
o the Annunciator Task Force Miscellaneous control room modifications to support resolution of o
HEDs and to support design changes Completion of vertical meter replacement (for red pointers) o Unit 1 was declared in commercial operation during August 1988, Since September 1988, activities related to CRDR on Unit 2 have been the following:
o Evaluations against Category E deferred criteria for the control room and ASP room j
o Completion of meter zone coding 110028 1 11 STP55 12/01/89
nousion CONTROL ROOM Q
y*MG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5 o-Provision of common alarms in Unit 2 control room o
Miscellaneous control room modifications to support resolutions of HEDs and to support design changes Unit 2 was declared in commercial operation during June 1989.
I Various human engineering observations have been evaluated and categorized, as indicated in Table 2 3 and the HED Resolution Report Addendum 4.
The methodology used for the evaluations against Category E deferred criteria and for the various human engineering observations is described in Section 2.
O The Annunciato,r Task Force effort (identified in Section 5, Item 26),
regarding alarms presentation to the operator, has been continued. This effort identifies problems, studies alternatives, and resolves issues related to alarms and messages presented to the operator by the following systems:
o Annunciator, including both annunciators and status / permissive windows o
ESF Status Monitoring o
Bistable Status Monitoring o
Plant Computer o
ERFDADS Computer This effort is a long term project, initially identifying problems associated with existing alarms / messages, and later identifying alarms / messages that 110026 1 12 STP55 12/01/89
^^
o j
,c nousioN CONTROL ROOM l*
G DESIGN REVIEW Powsa co.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
i ADDENDUM 5 could be added to enhance operator effectiveness. The initial phase of this task force, to identify and resolve nonconformances to the " black board" philosophy, has been completed. This design concept indicates that when no abnormal condition exists dating full power operation, the annunciator windows should be extin;uished, thus exhibiting a
- black board" to the operators.
6 Implementation of the resolutions is nearly complete on Unit 1; complete implementation on Unit 2 is targeted for the first refueling outage, 1
The computer displays are currently undergoing a thorough review to verify consistency with established CRDR criteria. This review encompasses various computer and display aspects, including technical correctness, effectiveness of display layout, use'of symbols, abbreviations and acronyms, and ths use of color.
Previously identified llEDs are also reviewed for applicability to each J
display and appropriate resolutions identified. Review of the Safety Parameter Display System displays has been completed; the recommendations are currently being evaluated for implementation.
The schedule for remaining CRDR activities is provided in Section 5.
c l
l 11002s 1 1,3 STP55 12/01/89
r t
D a*ousioN H
CONTROL ROOM (3
DESIGN REVIEW L
.m,-
PO4rER CO.
j EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5 r
2.0 METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS i
2.1 METHODOLOGY The methodology for the Category E evaluations and other planned CRDR activities varies from that used prior to January 1, 1986, since the tasks involve evaluations deferred from earlier phases in the CRDR and verification of appropriate resolution of previous HEDs.
To proceed with the " Planned Activities" remaining from January 1986 (identified in Section 5, Items 1 through 16) in an orderly fashion, each i
, ( }
activity or HED was tabulated separately and a reference / comment form provided for it.
This form is shown as Figure 2 1.
During the review process, each
' activity or HED reference / comment form was annotated regarding compliance using one of the following:
y I
o N/A - Not applicable o
Yes - In compliance o
No - Not in compliance 1
If the item is identified as not in compliance, a human engineering L
l observation (HEO) form is filled out for disposition of the observation.
L (See Figure 2-2.)
In some instances, the item is again deferred, since it can not be evaluated due to the current control room status.
In this case, no compliance status is O
(,j indicated;:the item identification and the reference / comment form are retained for later evaluation.
110028 1 21
'STP55 12/01/89
)
Houston CONTROL ROOM (J
DESIGN REVIEW 1
UGH G
~
s POWER CO.
]
EXECUTIVE SU)0%RY ADDENDUN 5
)
Additional comments and observati,ons are made by operators or by engineering personnel.
These observations are also documented on HE0 forms.
The HEOs generated are then submitted for project assessment.
2.2 RESULTS 1
The status of the remaining evaluations of the " Planned Activities" (Section 5, Itents 1 through 16 plus item 25 for the Auxiliary Shutdown Panel), is summarized on tablas as shown below:
Table 2 1 Contr'o1 Room Table 2 2 Auxiliary Shutdown Panel Room Note that these tables provide the status of evaluations for both Unit 1 and Unit 2.
(Previous addenda have addressed only the Unit I control room.)
1 The auxiliary shutdown panel and Unit 2 control room Category E evaluations began with the review of the original Category E deferred items to identify which items were appropriate for review at these locations.
Design and component similarities between the two control rooms and the auxiliary shutdown panels resulted in the Unit 1 control room review of many items being applicable to the ASP and the Unit 2 control room as well.
A total of 13 HEDs have been identified since September 1988 through the Category E deferred criterie evaluations. An additional six HEDs have been identified through operator or engineering observations. Table 2 3 shows the categorization of these HEDs, which are shown in more detail in the HED Resolution Report Addendum 4 (beginning with HED 1143).
l 110026 1 22 STP55 12/01/89
a nousToN CONTROL ROOM
}
}*
G DESIGN REVIEW
(
Powan co.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5 The remaining control room Category E deferred items are shown in Table 2 4 (Workspace), Table 2 5 (Communications), Table 2 6 (Visual Displays), and Table 2 7 (Computers).
In addition, there are nine deferred items in the Visual Displays criteria that were previously categorized and therefore not included as Catpgory E items (refer to Table 2 8).
The Unit 2 Category E deferred items evaluations were performed prior to fuel load, with remaining evaluations generally the same as those for Unit 1 (refer to Tables 2-4 through 2 7).
The remaining ASP Category E deferred items are shown in Table 2 9 (Workspace) Table 2-10 (Communications), Table 2 11 (Visual Displays), and Table 2 12 (Computers).
Figure 2 3 presents the HED assessment factor criteria and implementation commitments.
The schedule for the remaining work is addressed in Section 5.
I 1
l O
11002s 1 23 l
STP55 12/01/89 l
I i
G POWER CO.
nouston CONTROL ROOM UGH G
DESIGN REVIEW rm iJ a
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
l ADDENDUM S j
TABLE 2 1 F ARY OF STATUS! CONTROL ROOM PIANNED ACTIVITY EVALUATION [
(Items 1 through 16, Section 5)
I REMAINING NUMBER OF NUMBER NUMBER I
ACTIVITY NUMBER CRITERIA 0F HEDs OF ITEMS OF ITEMS MET REPORTED DEFERRED (Sheets).
(Evaluations (Tables 2 4 (As of Performed thru 2 8) 9/88) in 10/88)
Unit 1/ Unit 2 Unit 1/ Unit 2 Unit 1/ Unit 2 Criteria to be Evaluated i
(Category E)
Workspace 4/28 4/17 3
0/8 Communications 0/7 0/4 0
0/3 Visual Displays 8/39 8/29 0
0/10 Labels 0/9 0/9 0
0/0 Computers 1/6 0/5 0
1/1 Control / Display Integration 13/0*
13/0 0
0/0 HEDs to be Resolved 9/0*
O/0 0
9/0 TOTAL 35/89 25/64 3
10/22 O
- Unit 1 evaluation applicable to Unit 2.
v1002s 1 2-4 STP55 12/01/89
z Da Houston CONTROL ROOM O
UGHMG DESIGN REVIEW t/
1 Powan co.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5 TABLE 2 2 1
SUMMARY
OF STATUS! ASP ROOM PIANNED ACTIVITY EVALUATIONS (Item 25, Section 5)
REMAINING NUMBER OF NUMBER NUMBER ACTIVITY NUMBER CRITERIA 0F HEDs OF ITEMS OF ITEMS MET REPORTED DEFERRED (Sheets)
(Evaluations (Tables 2 9 i
(As of Performed thru 2 12) 9/88) in 10/88)
Unit 1/ Unit 2 Unit 1/ Unit 2 Unit 1/ Unit 2 O
I Criteria to be Evaluated (Category E)
Workspace 47/47 32/28 8*
0/9 Communications 37/37 35/30 1
1/7 Annunciators 5/5 5/5 0
0/0 Controls 1/1 1/1 0
0/0 Visual Displays 28/28 25/25 1*
1/0**
I Labels 3/3 3/3 0
0/0 i
Computers 6/6 6/4 0
0/2 Control / Display Integration 6/6 6/6 0
0/0 TOTAL 133/133 113/102 10 2/18
- Several items combined into similar HEDs.
- Unit 1 evaluations applicable to Unit 2.
110028 1 25 STP55 12/01/89
HousioN CONTROL ROOM 0,~
}*H DESIGN REVIEW
\\
G Powen co.
I EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5 t
TABLE 2 3 NE'W HEDs i
CATEGORY ACTIVITY A
B C
D TOTAL HEDs Identified through Category E Deferred Item Evaluations Workspace 0
1 2
8 11 Communications 0
0 0
1 1
Visual Displays O
O O
1 1
HEDs Identified by Operators or Engineering 0
3 2
1 6
TOTALS 0
4 4
11 19 l-l l
I O
i 110028-1 26 STP55 12/01/89
t i
Dnouston CONTROL ROOM i
(h L*
0 DESIGN REVIEW m) s POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5
}
TABLE 2 4
{
DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS:
CONTROL ROOM HP AREA! VORKSPACE l
e STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS Unit 1 Completed Unit 2 Document Organization 6.1.1.4 0097 Deferred for later review, and Storage Expendebles 6.1.1.5 0102 Deferred for later review.
0105 0106 Emergency Equipment C.I.B 0158 Deferred for later review, C.1.0 0163 C.1.1 0164 C.1.H 0165 t
2.,
STP55 12/01/89
QHousioN CONTROL ROOM Q
l*
DESIGN REVIEW Powan co.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5
. TABLE 2 5 DETERRED CRITERIA ITEMS: CONTROL ROOM HF AREA! COMMUNICATIONS STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS 4
Unit 1 Completed Unit 2 Background Noise 7.6 0282 Deferred for later review.
0283 Sound powered 7.3 0256 Deferred for later review.
Telephones 11002s 1 28 STP55 12/01/89
e i
DHousioN CONTROL ROOM
\\
f")
fG DESIGN REVIEW Powan co.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM S i
TABLE 2 6 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS: CONTROL ROOM HF AREA! VISUAL DISPLAYS t
STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS Unit 1 Completed Unit 2 Expendable Materials 1.3 0296 Deferred for later review.
0307 0318 0375 0488 0685 0770 0793 0923 1004 I
O 2.,
STP55 12/01/89
I i
i nousioN CONTROL ROOM C)
DESIGN REVIEW s
POWER CO.
i EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
j ADDENDUM 5 i
t TABLE 2 7 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS! CONTROL ROOM i
HP AREAt COMPUTERS l
l STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA FUMBER REMARKS I
l Unit 1 i
s Plant Computer.
Appendix P, 0824 Deferred for later review.
Access Aids P.4 Unit 2 i
L.
Plant Computer -
Appendix P, 0824 Deferred for later review.
Access Aids P.4 e
p O
r 1too2s 1 2-10 STP55 12/01/89
I i
l DnousToN CONTROL ROOM i
Q j*MG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO, EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5 TABLE 2 8 PREVIOUSLY CATECORIZED DEFERRED ITEMS t
}{E,fREA: VISUAL DISPIAYS STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS Visual Displays.
Appendix F 0331 Deferred for later review, Scale Marking 0362 0477 0652 0721 0745 t0 0761 0784 0673 d
r D
! O t
l L
j 1100281 2 11 l
STP55 12/01/89 1
I i
Onouston CONTROL ROOM "Q
}*H DESIGN REVIEW G
Powan co.
EXEQUTIVE
SUMMARY
i ADDENDUM $
TABLE 2 9 j
DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS:
ASP ROOM HF AREA! WORKSPACE I
STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS Unit 1 Completed 1
Unit 2 Document Organization 6.1.1.4 0097 Deferred for later review, and Storage-0098 0099 0100 0101 Expendables 6.1.1.5 0102 Deferred for later review.
0104 1
0105 Reference Materials A.6 0145 Deferred for later review.
j l
l l
1100281 2-12 STP55 12/01/89
I nouston CONTROL ROOM
()
l*
G DESIGN REWEW powen co.
i EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5
)
f TABLE 2 10 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS! ASP ROOM i
^
HP AREA! COMMUNICATIONS STP SHEET I
CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS i
Unit i Background Noise &
7.6 0282 Deferred for resolution Communication with noise HEDs.
Unit 2 Sound powered 7.3 0256 Deferred for later review.
Telephones 0257 Announcing System 7.5 0276 Deferred for later review.
0277 0279 0280 Background Noise &
7.6 0282 Deferred for resolution Communication with noise HEDs.
4 l
OV 110028 1 2 13 STP55 12/01/89
k i
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM Q
}*HMG DESIGN REVIEW POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5
, TABLE 2 11 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMSi ASP ROOM HP AREA! VISUAL DISP 1AYS STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS i
Visual Disp 1ays -
Appendix F 0958 Deferred for later review.
Scale Craduations Unit 1 evaluation applicable to Unit 2.
O 4
O I
ii 2 14 STP55 12/01/89
t Dj*ouston n
CONTROL ROOM Q
G DESIGN REVIEW l
men co.
f EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
a ADDENDUM 5
^
TABLE 2-12 DEFERRED CRITERIA ITEMS: ASP ROOM HF AREA! COMPUTERS t
STP SHEET CRITERIA TITLE CRITERIA NUMBER REMARKS Unit 1 Completed l
i Unit 2 e
O CRT Display Q.1.B 0826 Deferred for later review.
Characteristics Q.1.C 0827 I
l l
i l
l l
l l
O 2 15 i
STP55 12/01/89 l
l Housien CONTROL R00ht Lt*HTIN*
DESIGN REVIEW O.
POWER CO.
FIGURE 2-1 DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW CONTROL R00M 80RVEY REFERENCE / COMMENT FORM 98BtRVth Daft:
Patt JF L9tatster SUIDELitt ChiftRIA 1795 St.:
- 10 htiIht#C4 #8.1 cosettaucts e/A Ytt UD Jan....f,3!P... ev***'
an== = =
0
+
r DIAGRAst/Pn0 f 0 #0.i g
DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW CONTROL ROOM SURVEY REFERENCE / COMMENT FORM
\\
t Houston CONTROL ROOM Cr pHM FIGURE 2-2 8'"
88" man co.
TYPICAL HE0 ASSESSMENT FORM STPHUMANENGINEERINGOBSERVATIONASSESSMENT l
HE0 NO.
REV.
HED NO.
CAT.
TITLE:
REF:
i ORIGINATOR:
DATE:
UNIT APPLICABILITY: UNIT 1 UNIT 2 BOTH UNITS i
HE0 DESCRIPTION:
POTENTIAL OPERATOR ERROR:
k RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION:
PRT REVIEW:
[ ] CONCUR
[ } CONCUR WITH COMMENTS
[ ] NOT A HUMAN ENGINEERING DISCREPANCY COMMENTS:
e I
CHAIRMAN:
DATE:
RECOMMENDED IMPLEMENTATION:
[ ] MANDATORY IMMEDIATE COSRECTIVE ACTION
[.) AT EARLIEST OPPORTUNITY (HIGH PRIORITY)
[ } CONVENIENT REFUELING OUTAGE (NOT TO EXCEED 2 YEARS) (ROUTINE)
[ ] OPTIONAL
[ ] OTHER 1100281
oE" EE O
FIGURE 2-3 HED ASSESSMENT FACTOR CRITERIA ASSESSMENT IMPLEMENTATION CATEGORY FACTOR (RATING)
A SAFETY MANDATORY IMMEDIATE CORRECTIVE ACTION CONSEQUENCES 3
PLANT AT EARLIEST AVAILABILITY OPPORTUNITY O
ENHANCEMENT (HIGH PRIORITY)
CONVENIENT C
EQUIPMENT /
PLANT REFUELING OUTAGE (NOT TO RELIABILITY EXCEED 2 YRS)
ENHANCEMENT (ROUTINE)
]
MINOR OPTIONAL 4
4 O
1100281
DHousToN CONTROL ROOM fMG DESIGN REVIEW
(}
POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5
)
5.0 SCHEDULE This section lists the activities planned for completion as part of this CRDR.
These activities will be tracked for completion as part of the STP CRDR program (see Piogrun Plan Addendum 1) and the STP Licensing Commitment Tracking System.
Items 1 through 17 are those initially listed in Section 5 of Addendum 1 and updated in Addendua 2.
For clarity, no items have been deleted from the
~ list. As items become resolved, the resolution has been shown rather than the schedule for completion.
Items have been added as required to reflect additional planned activities.
Planned Activity Resolution /Comoletion Timeframe 1.
Check visibility of green COMPLETED 12 86, rototellite indicating lights Meets criteria. Evaluation is (Category A HEDs S.367, 484, applicable to Unit 1 and Unit 2.
679, 725, and 748)
Refer to HED Resolution Report.
Current Addenduta, 2.
Correct poor readability of COMPLETED 04 85, bypass / inoperable status Meets criteria.
Evaluation is lights (Category A HEDs S 726, applicable to Unit I and Unit 2.
732, 749, and 767)
Refer to initial HED Resolution Report, Page A.S.
l 1100281 51 STP55 12/01/89
I CONTROL ROOM Dnouston
{}
l*
G DESIGN REVIEW i
POWER CO.
j EXE,CUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5 Planned Activity Re s olution/Connle tion Titre frame 3.
Completion of meter zone coding COMPLETED 06 89.
(Category B HEDs S 006, 288, Methodology evaluated 12 86, 676, 299, 310, 764, 787, 480, meets criteria.
Evaluation is i
364, 060, 912, 961, and 998) applicable to both units.
I l
Inglementation COMPLETED for i
Unit 1, 11 87.
Implementation COMP 1.ETED for Unit 2, 06 89.
Refer to HED Resolution Report Current Addendum.
l 4
Random sample label checkout to COMPLETED 12 86.
verify readability Meets criteria.
Evaluation is applicable to Unit 1 and Unit 2.
l 5.
Review of QDPS plasma displays COMPLETED 12 86, as replacement for panel meters Meets criteria.
Evaluation is applicable to Unit 1 and Unit 2.
6.
Check effectiveness of annunciator COMPLETED 12 86.
horns (Category A UED S 510)
Meets criteria.
Evaluation is applicable to Unit 1 and Unit 2.
Refer to HED Resolution Report Current Addendum.
7.
Random sample annunciator tile COMPLETED 12 86.
checkout to verify readability Meets criteria.
Evaluation is l
applicable to Unit 1 and Unit 2.
110028 1 52 STP55 12/01/89
e i
Gnouston CONTROL ROOM
}numa ogspgN REyggy Q
POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5
^
Planned Activity Resolution / Completion Timeframe 8.
Random sample review of COMPLETED 12 86.
demarcation painting Evaluation is applicable to Unit t
1 and Unit 2.
Resulted in new HED.
Refer to HED Resolution Report Current Addendum: HED 1045.
9.
Implementation of use of lever COMPLETED 12 86, handles for " select" functions Meets intent of criteria.
and review to confirm correction Evaluation is applicable'to of switch position readability Unit 1 and Unit 2.
(cateEory B HEDs S.711, 734, 695, Refer to HED Resolution Report 705, 699, and 459)
Current Addendum.
- 10. Review corrective action to COMPLETED 04 85, address live zero indication Evaluation is applicable to (Category B HEDs S.715, 665, 738, Unit 1 and Unit 2.
646, 754, 777, 469, 356, 332, 328, Refer to initial HED Resolution 891, 941, and 977)
Report, page B 14.
11.
Complete corrective action to Partial completion 12-86.
replace meter scales and random All items have been evaluated, sample checkout to verify read-Evaluation is applicable to ability (Category B HEDs S 678 Unit 1 and Unit 2.
879, 881, 870, 874, 883, 799, 803, Refer to Table 2-8 for remaining 807, 89.2, 716, 666, 739, 776, 470, open items, which have been 877, 880, 882, 872, 873, 884, 800, deferred for further review.
804, 808, 718, 668, 741, 757, 778, Refer to HED Resolution Report 11002s 1 53 STP55 12/01/89
r I
DHousion CONTROL ROOM UGHMO DESIGN REVIEW
(~'
a POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM $
I 2
I I
Planned Activity Resolution /Comoletion Timeframe 11.
(Continued) l 471, 404, 406, 719, 670, 742, 649, Current Addendum.
759, 781, 475, 359, 334, 329, 671, 743, 650, 782, 360, 392, 720, 672, 744, 651, 760, 783, 476, 361, 721, 673, 745, 652, 761, 784, 477, 362, 331, 871, and 885) 12.
Random sample legend light COMP 1.ETED 12 86.
engraving checkout to verify Meets criteria.
Evaluation is readability applicable to Unit 1 and Unit 2.
l
)
13.
Complete corrective action
,After completion of recorder on recorder chart paper chart paper replacement, in i
(Category B HEDs S.376 and 771) conjunction with Table 2 6 items.
(
and random sample checkout to Refer to initial HED Resolution
)
verify readability and Report, Page B 21.
accessibility of supplies.
]
i 14.
Implementation of corrective Painting pointers leads to I
(
action to paint all vertical instrument inaccuracies.
meter pointers red and random Vertical meters without red sample checkout (Category B pointers are to be replaced.
HEDs S 724, 675, 747, 655, 763, Unit 1:
COMPLETED 11 89.
1 i
786, 479, 408, 911, 960, and 997).
Unit 2:
Prior to startup from first refueling outage.
j i
Refer to HED Resolution Report Current Addendum.
110028-1 54 STP55 12/01/89 1
t DHOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
\\
~h UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW (V
a POWER CO.
1
'1 EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5 Planned Activity Resolution /Comoletion Timeframe l
- 15. Operator review of status light COMPLETED 12 86.
interpretation on SGFP Turbine Meets criteria. Evaluation is 1
Control Panel applicable to Unit 1 and Unit 2.
16.
Completion of Control Room L
Category E Criteria reviews:
L A.
Workspace criteria Unit 1:
COMPLETED 10 88,
~
including:
Evaluations 12-86, 01 87, 06 87,
,(
and 10-88.
Some evaluations L
o Furniture and equipment applicable to Unit 2.
layout o Document organization Unit 2:
Partial completion and storage 10 88 for criteria that could 1
o Spare parts, operating not be evaluated with Unit 1 j
l expendables and tools reviews (e.g., ventilation, o Nonessential personnel illumination, auditory).
See access Table 2-4 for remaining open o Reference material items.
placement o Desk dimensions o Chair dimensions Resulted in new HEDs.
E o Emergency equipment Refer to HED Resolution Report o Ventilation Current Addendu'n: HED-1029, L
o Illumination 1030, 1060, 1061, 1062, 1063, Emergency lighting 1086, 1087, 1088, 1143, 1150, o
o Auditory and 1156.
o Ambience and comfort 11002s1 5-5 STP55 12/01/89 i
e i
HousioN CONTROL ROOM y
fGHTING OgSlGN ggyjgg POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5.
)
Planned Activity Resolution / Completion Timeframe 16.
(Continued)
Workspace criteria reviews for the git-down consoles and work stations and for l-the vertical panels Random sample check of accessibility to controls and potential for inadvertent O'v actuation i
B.
Communications criteria Unit 1: COMPLETED 06 87.
j.
including:
Some evaluations applicable to l
Unit 2.
l-o Information exchange Unit 2:
Partial completion o convenience of use 10 88.
See Table 2-5 for o Reliability remaining open items, o Interference o Allocation of functions l
o Voice communication links Resulted in new HEDs.
o Conventional powered Refer to HED Resolution Report telephone system Current Addendum: HED-1083, o Sound powered telephone 1084, and 1085.
system o Radio transceivers O
.Q o Walkie-talkie radio transceivers 11002s 1 q
5-6 STP55 12/01/89
! ' _. J' l
-l l'
CONTROL ROOM Houston Q
j'0HT'NG DESIGN REVIEW
. POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5
}
Planned Activity Resolution /Concletion Timeframe 16; (Continued)-
e Tixed base UHF transceivers o Announcing system o Background noise o Emer6ency face masks C.
Annunciation criteria for:
COMPLETED 12 86.
Meets criteria.
Evaluation is L ()
Computer display /
applicable to Unit 1 and Unit 2.
o annunciation / printer features D.
Controls criteria for COMPLETED 12 86.
compatibility with Meets criteria.
Evaluation is emergency gear applicable to Unit 1 and Unit 2.
t E.
Visual display criteria Unit 1: COMPLETED 10 88.
for:
Evaluations 12 86 and 10 88.
Meets criteria.
Some evaluations o Meters applicable to Unit 2.
o Ambient light sources /
light intensity Unit 2:
Partial completion 10 88 o Interchanging of for criteria that could not be indicator lenses evaluated with Unit i reviews o Expendable materials (e.g., ambient light sources /
.(s) light. intensity).
See Table 2-6 for remaining open items.
11cm2s 1 5-7 STP55 12/01/89
Ipl pili I
l
. HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM Q
~
tGHTING DESIGN REVIEW
- ~
POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM 5 Planned Activity Resolution / Completion Timoframe 16.
(Continued)
F.
Labels criteria COMPLETED 10 88.
Unit i evaluations 12-86. Meets criteria.
Some evaluations applieable to Unit 2.
g Unit 2 evaluations 10 88.
Meets criteria.
G.
Computer criteria fo'r:
Unit 1:
Partial completion 12 86 and 9-88.
Some evaluations o Plant compute-.
applicable to Unit 2.
See Table o ERFDADS, including-2-7 for remaining open item.
SPDS o QDPS Unit 2:
Partial completion 10-88 for criteria that could not be evaluated with Unit I reviews (e.g., glare on CRT).
See Table 2-7 for remaining open item.
Resulted in new HEDs.
Refer to HED Resolution Report Current Addendum: HED-1033, 1034, 1035, 1036, 1037, 1038, 1039, 1040, 1041, 1042, and 1049.
11002e 1 5-8 STP55 12/01/89
a l
i HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM
}90HT'NG DESIGN REVIEW
. POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM S Planned Activity Resolution /Comoletion Timeframe 16.
(Continued)
H.
Control / display integration COMPLETED 10 88.
criterf.a Evaluations 12 86 and 10 88.
Meets criteria. Evaluations are applicable to Unit 1 and Unit 2.
17.
EOP Validation COMPLETED 05 86.
(including confirmation of Evaluation is applicable to
-instrumentation and control Unit 1 and Unit 2.
functions)
Refer to E0P Validation heport.
18.
Label reviews for accuracy, ongoing review of label changes adequacy, and conformance in current plant modifications.
to standard abbreviations Review of existing labels deferred for later evaluations.
19.
Computer display reviews Reviews and revisions pr or to end of third refueling outage of Unit 1 and the second refueling outage of Unit 2, with exception of QDPS (revisions prior to end of third refueling e on each unit).
SPDS displays review completed 11-89.
Recommendations being evaluated for implementation.
110028 1 5-9 STP55 12/01/89
F 1
L p-1 HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM LIGHTING DESIGN REVIEW a
l ~'
POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
j ADDENDUM S t
11 i
Planned Activity Resolution /Comoletion Timeframe 1
l-L 20..
Implementation of Unit 1: COMPLETED prior to 1
Category A HED resolutions commercial operation (August (excluding QDPS) 1988).
Unit 2:
COMPLETED prior to fuel load (December 1988).
21.
Implementation of Unit 1:
COMPLETED prior to i
Category B HED resolutions commercial operation (August.
(excluding QDPS) 1988), for HEDs up to and including HED 1096.
For HEDs i
from HED 1096 to HED-1142, j
COMPLETED prior to end of first refueling outage.
i Unit 2:
COMPLETED prior to commercial operation (June 1989),
for HEDs up to and including HED-1142.
l For HEDs after HED 1142, l
implementation is targeted to be l
in accordance with Figure 2-3, with implementation prior to end of first refueling outage after categorization.
- O
.1100281 5-10 STP55 12/01/89
J, 1
l t
HOUSTON CONTROL ROOM F fN UGHTING DESIGN REVIEW.
.qj s
POWER CO.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
ADDENDUM S L
Planned Activity Resolution /Comoletion Timeframe 22.
QDPS HED resolutions COMPLETED 11 89.
(Refer to HED Resolution Exceptions are resolutions Report Current Addendum, for HED 1022, 1041,.and 1126 for Disposition Note CPT-1.)
which implementation is prior to I
end of third refueling outage on l
each unit.
L 23.
Imple:nentation of Category C Implementation integrated into HED resolutions plant modification schedule, with implementation-targeted for prior to end of the third refueling I'
outage of Unit 1 and the second 1
l refueling outage of Unit 2.
l~
24.
Implementation of Category D Implementation integrated into HED resolutions plant modification schedule based l
on priority.
l 25.
Category E evaluations Partial completion 10 88, for Auxiliary Shutdown Panel See Tables 2-9 through 2-12 for remaining open items.
Resulted in new HEDs.
Refer ts !!ED Resolution Report Current Addendum: HED-1146, 1147, 1148, 1149, 1151, 1152, 1153, 1154, 1155, and 1157.
26.
Annunciator Task Force Ongoing.
110028 1 5 11 STP55 12/01/89
-