ML20005D544

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Info Notice 88-046 Re Supply of Defective Refurbished Electrical Equipment to Power Plants for Info & Informs of Ongoing Investigation Re Matter.W/O Encl
ML20005D544
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/03/1988
From: Grimes B
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
CONGRESS (JOINT & ROTATING COMMITTEES, ETC.)
Shared Package
ML20005D541 List:
References
FOIA-89-404 IEIN-88-046, IEIN-88-46, NUDOCS 8808230052
Download: ML20005D544 (2)


Text

._._

?p 'Mp1 Y!W '

!.w

?

Ih; i

{llt, p, 40 ?s** *8%'g~,.

- UNITED STATES '

he

.G V

}-

NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION'-

y

=g

, p:

wasmwovow, p. c. nosss

g.

i+

w.. l

-/ O - a t.

- t AUG ~ 3198B.

1 U.S." Capital j

Storeroom house Office Building

. Canal D Street, S.W.

i)'

il(,

Washington, D.C. _20515-

Dear Sir:

0 w

L

SUBJECT:

POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE REFURBISHED CIRCULI BREAKERS-t L

.The enclosed Nuclear Regulatory Connission (NRC) Information Notice (IN) 88-46 i

' describes the circumstances unoer which defective refurbished electrical equip-ment-me'y_heve been supplied to nuclear. power plants.

Our continuing investiga-tion'of the five circuit oreaker companies identified in the IN-shows.that the-l companies:have chipped breakers-to a number of government facilities and agencies.

4 l0ur. review of a san.ple of. invoices indicates that_ generally tne breakers are b

sold to a distributor,:and it was only the occasional shipment direct to the end b

' user that permitted us to identify the final' government destination, i

1.have enclosed a copy of an invoice that identify your agency as the custoner. These. documents represent our review of a selection of records

. spanning.the last two or three years from all of the companies.

As other records

are reviewed. we will proside any: additional information that comes-to' light.

]

-Howeker, since some of the companies have been in business for as many as 30 j

z years,'a full historical records search will not be possible.

1 The,fiv'e California companies appear to sell surplus new as' well as refurbished breakerr. However, their refurbished equipment may be shippeo irt containers resembling original manufacturer containers.

g, T?

If.there.is any additional information you require, please call'me or

-Mr.'Wulter Haass at (301) 492-3219..

m Sincerely, j

[

Q m[

n j,:

Brian K. Grimes, Director lr' Divicion of Reactor Inspection and Safeguerds

[

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation y

Enclosures:

T

'As stateo y

o.

[rjffg230e52 2rr-O

7 -,v, -

t<

1/ / /i A/j.

r 1'

'O[)

V's. Capitel_ AUG

li;-;

i

-L.

' DISTRIBUTION:w/v Enclosures

~UT6ylor

-JSnierek

- TMa rtir. -

BGrimes J5 tone l

t 1

5 f

t

/

[C i

f p7 DR15:NRE n?

~,N 'JStone:tt (y hyss B

.1.

s

" pyce c,,)

a,..

t-(

l N

E

}

f hr 4

' 2. A ;

^W t

/

M g

D ' m nd>/.

l f

.- i w

M

'AUG 101989 h

~

L q

/

Mr? Frederick F. Franklin, P.E.

1

-President Professional Analytical and Consulting Engineers, Inc.

4325 Indeco Court Cincinnati, Ohio 45241 q

)

Dear Mr. Franklin:

This letter is provided in response to your letter of July 15, 1988 in which you referred to a newspaper article stating that nuclear power plants may have L

bought used circuit breakers that were falsely labeled as new.

Your letter

. indicates that even new North American circuit breakers are not properly designed to prevent short circuit fires, particularly in residential and commercial installations.

Although you do not specifically mention any problems-in nuclear power plants, we conclude that'your concern extends to them also.

L The information you submitted indicates that your research concentrated on 15-and 20-ampere circuit-breakers. You note that most household short circuits result in a 150- to 400-ampere short and that the magnetic (quick) trips of North American circuit breakers may be set in excess of this range. You state that the thermal'(slow) trip may require several seconds at 100 amperes.

Further, you note that European breakers are designed to magnetically trip at lower ratings than North American breakers.

L Our concern regarding the nuclear power plant circuit breakers that may have l

been falsely labeled as-new, as mentioned in the newspaper article, is with L

their ability to function as they are supposed to do. As we understand it, L

'your concern is'with-the designed magnetic trip settings of North American L

circuit-breakers, particularly that they may not trip fast enough during a short circuit to prevent a household fire. We will attempt to address this concern as it may relate to nuclear power plants.

First, we note that the European-style breakers that you appear to be recommending have not been approved by Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. (UL)'.

One of.the reasons given by UL for'this circumstance is that the interrupting ratings of European breakers are not sufficient for most North American applications. This fact would be particularly significant in a nuclear power plant where the protection of safety-related equipment is a primary concern.

l Second, nuclear power plants have extensive fire protection, fire detection and fire mitigation requirements. These include:

(1)

Identification of fire hazards (2) Automatic fire detection systems (3) Automatic fire suppression systems c

nu>

no#1OA f.

~

Gb R V " ' '

h(

TlI F. Franklin

-2 W i ( Q.,

(4 Fire barriers and barricades (5

Separation of cables from combustible material (6

Onsite' fire brigades

-(7) Personnel training and periodic surveillance of cables and equipment (8) Enclosure of cables and equipment In addition to these requirements, nuclear plant regulations also require-rigorous design and testing of electrical equipment.and circuits to ensure a

.high level of reliability of safety systems. The design requires redundancy of electrical circuits and separation of the redundant circuits.

Flame tests, in accordance with Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Standard 383, are required to ensure that cables are fire resistant and will not propagate a fire.

Thus, it is unlikely that a relatively low. amperage short circuit as you described would cause a significant fire.

Finally, experience does not indicate that a fire hazard exists at nuclear plants because of-low-amperage short circuits. Of greater concern are high-amperage faults that are not cleared and that may cause equipment damage or may propagate to other systems.

Finally, designing or setting circuit breakers to trip at five times the breaker ampere rating could result in spurious trips of the breakers during motor

. sta.rting.

Such a trip could disable safety equipment and safety systems when they are most needed to prevent or to mitigate an accident condition.

Although we do not anticipate any significant problems at nuclear power plants from the types of shor 1rcuits7Niescribed, we appreciate the insight you have provided regardi g this phenomena h will consider it in our ongoing safety reviews. We thank yo for your conce_r3/

Sincerely, Original signed by' Dous I. Wrley Thomas E. Murley, Director l

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i

.SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE

)FC :SELB/ DEST *

SC/SELB/ DEST *:BC/SELB/ DEST *: ARM /PPMB* : SAD / DEST *
D/ DEST *
ADT*

ilAME :AToalston:ct:JEKnight

FRosa
BCalure
AThadani
LShao
TMartin u....:............:.............:............:............:............:...........:...........

1 ATE :8/ 1 /88

8/ 2 /88
8/ 2/88
8/4/88
8/ 5 /88
8/ 5/88
8/ 8 /88

)

un-Tl4

>FC :NR /DD

t R

.,......g JAME.:

ek

lMurley i

) ATE :8/10 /88

8/l0/88 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

3 i

n b

F. Franklin

-2 1)

Identification of fire haza ds Automatic fire etection sy tems Automaticfiresppression/ systems

[

Fire barriers an barrica es-(S Separation of cabi s fro combustible material (6

Onsite fire brigad (7

Personnel training nd eriodic surveillance of cables and equipment

_(8) Enclosure of-cables a equipment In addition to these requirements, nuclea lant regulations also require il rigorous design and testing of_electrica e uipment and circuits to ensure a i

high level of reliability of safety sys ms. The design requires redundancy of electrical circuits and separation o the edundant circuits.

Flame tests, in accordance with Institute of Electr cal an Electronics Engineers Standard 383, are required to ensure that cable are fi e resistant and will not propagate a fire. Thus, it is unlike y that a elatively low-amperage short circuit as you described would cause fire.

F ally, experience does not indicate that a fire hazard exists a nuclear el nts huause of low-amperage short circuits. 'Of greater concern re high.ampe agt fiults that are not cleared and that may cause equipmen damage or ma propagate to other systems.

Also, designing or setting circuit reekers to trip at five times the breaker ampere rating could result in spur ous trips of the reakers during motor starting.

Such a trip could remov safety.. equipment and safety systems when they are most needed to prevent o to mitigate an ac dent condition.

Although we do not anticipate an roblems at nuclear ower plants from the~

types of short circuits you_ des ~ibed, we appreciate t e insight you have-provided regarding this phenome a and will consider it n out. ongoing safety

. reviews. We thank you for your concern.

Sincerely, Thomas E. Murley, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation f

/

z,

l'OSEEPREVIOUSCONCURRENCE

, OFC
SELB/ DEST *
SC/SELB/ DEST *:BC/SELB/ DEST *: ARM /PPMB*: SAD /DESTtq :D/IW51/
ADT j...... :............ :............. :............ :............ :........ p... :. f.../.... :...

L NAME :AToalston:ct:JEKnight

FRosa
BCalure
AThadani
,attin

)

1

......:v

....d.....

,7.....:............:.............:............:............:....(88

8/ <~/88
8/

88

-DATE :8/ 1 /88

8/ 2 /88
8/ 2/88
8/4/88
8/

1 0FC :NRR/DD

NRR/D NAME :JSniezek
TMurley L

DATE':8/

/88

8/ /88 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

a

.o-

/

r

)

d:

F. Franklin

  • Identikicationoffirehazard Automatic fire detection sys

~Automaticxfiresuppressionsy) ems stems j

(d Fire barrihrs and barricade (e

Separation f cables from ombustible material (f

Onsite fire igades (g

Personnel tra ing and pe iodic surveillance (h

Enclosure of c les and e uipment In addition to the fire protection re uirem ts, nuclear plant regulations require-rigorous design and testing of electri al e uipment and circuits to assure a high reliebility of safety systems.

The des gn equires redundancy of electrical circuits and separation of the redundant circuits Flame tests, in accordance with.IEEE Standard 383,'are required to ensure that cables are fire resistant and will not propagate a fire. Thus, it is unlikely t a relatively low amperage short circuit as' described by you would propag te into a fire.

Finally, experience does not'suggest a fire hazard at nuclear p1 ts ue to low amperage short circuits.

Of greater concern are high amperage fa'its w ich are not cleared and which may result in equipment damage or may prop gate te other systems.

.Also, designing or setting circuit br akers to t ip at five times the breaker ampere rating could result in spuriou trips of t e breakers during motor starting requirements.

Such a trip could rem ve safety equ'pment and safety systems when they are most needed to prevent or tigate an.acci ent condition.

Although we do not foresee any imm diate concern at n clear plants resulting from the types.of short circuits descri ed by you, we appr iate the insight you have provided regarding this phenomena and will consider i in our ongoing safety reviews. We-thank you for this ntribution to our kno ledge.

Thomas E. Murley, Direct r Office of Nuclear Reacto Regulation

'/ 2C AI '?

FC :5ELB/ DEST

SC/SELB/ DEST :BC/SELB/ DEST: ARM /P B
SAD / DEST
D/ DEST
ADT on:ct:JEKnight p M ::.......f7.g :....:............ :. [....

.(:AThadani

....:........g....

M :............:...........:...........

FRosa / (E :

LShao
TMartin-LAME :A l ATE:////88
f/ A /88
%/ 1'/88
b'V/88
5/

/88

S/

/88

5/

/88 L

lFC

NRR/DD-
NRR/D lAME :JSniezek
TMurley

. ATE :5/'

/88

t/ /88

-0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

i

' #) '

-)[

tF[ Franklin- -

Dist'ribution -

Central. Files l

SELB.Rdg.,

, NRC-- PDR -

A.-::Toalston (PF)

J. E. Knight F.' Rosa r

- NRC Editor-A. Thadani-

.LL. Shao (YT 889133)

T. Martin.

t J..Sniezek T. Murley

-B.-Grimes D.-Mossburg (YT:889133)

'J. : Norberg F. Gillespie

~S. Ebneter.-

L g.

?

^

~

g 1;

h h

c.

M

' August 18, 1988 m,

/*-

. Ms. Ida M. Ustad, Director 10ffice of GSA Acquisition Policy and Regulations Room 4026 18 and F' Streets, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20405

Dear Ms. Ustad:

SUBJECT:

POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT In out continuing reviews of the records obtained from the five California companies, additional invoices and orders have been found that identify GSA and certain other government agencies as the customer.

By separate corres-pondence, the NRC has'also provided copies of this material to affected agencies, as noted in the enclosed list. A copy of each invoice and order is enclosed..These are in addition to the copies sent to you by letter dated August 1, 1988.

If there is any additional information you require, please call me or Mr.

Kalter Haass at (301) 492-3219.

Sincerely, Original Skmed by Brian K. Grimes Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of_ Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1. List of Agencies Informed-
2. Invoices / Orders Distribution:

(w/oenclosures)

Jiaylor-JSniezek TMartin 6 Grimes JStone

.WHaass (w/ enclosures)

WMcNulty,RV(w/ enclosures)

KEccelston q

Central Files (h (

PDR DRIS.R/F(w/ enclosures)

.91B R/F f

/

/ A /'

n.

p/:NR 5

,0FC.

VI

/

RR.

VI :

iRR :C

D:

!NAME :WF m

U po rach

.e

!......:.......gc........:.......'.....:..............:..............:..............:.............

DATE-:08//b/88

08/8.88
08//)/88
08/ /788 h

./

n

e August 18, 1988 i

Defense Logistics Agency Headquarters, DLA-QL C6meron Station.

Alexandrie, Virginia 22304-6100

Dear Sir or Madam:

SUBJECT:

POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT _

i In our continuing reviews of the records obtained from the five California companies, additional invoices and orders have been found that identify military facilities and NASA es customers.

A copy of each invoice and order is enclosed.

These are in addition to the copies sent to you by letter dated August 1, 1900.

Copies of the enclosed material have been sent, as appropriate, to the Commander.

U.S. Army Material Command, the U.S. Department of Energy (NE-60) Headquarters U.S. Air Force-.(USAF/ LEYS), and NASA, Associate Administrator, SRM and QA. The Defense Logistics Agency may wish to coordinate its efforts with the four agencies.

Haess at (301)y additional information you require, pleese call me or Mr. Welter If there is an 492-3219.

Sincerely, orisnal swd by.

Brian K. Gdm8 Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguard:.

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

Invoices / Orders Distribution: (w/oenclosures) l diaylor JSnierek TMartin BGrimes JStone WHaass (w/ enclosures) l l

WMcNulty, RV (w/ enclosures)

KEccelston Central Files FDR DRISR/F(w/ enclosures) l l

418 R/F l

- o & A d4 r

n a m., 4 _

u v

W T U G >

~0FC
V
NRR
V B 5 NRR :C: '16:

15

D-,lM R

./........:..............:.............

l....

IfNAME

.mgc

P N
o rac im s l:......:................:.....

BDATE- :08//7/88

08//9/88
08/J7/88
08//7/88 1-

OI o

. J.a..

'/

[

'c, UNITED 5TATEs-j NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION t

. WrASMWCTON. D C. 70666 t

j/

Aminast 18, 1988 Lt t

l.'

- Nr. Charles M'. Bishop APS-130-Federal Aviation Aoir.inistratior, 800 Independence Avenue, 5.W.

Washington, D.C.

20591

Dear Mr. Bishop:

t

SUBJECT:

. POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT i

.In our continuing reviews of the records obtained from the five California companies, one accitional request for quotation (RFQ) has been found that identifies your agency as the_ potential custumer, A copy of the~RFQ is enclosed. This is in addition to the copies sent to you by letter dated Aligust 1,- 1988.

1 If there is any additional information you require, please call me or Mr. Walter haass at (301) 492-3219.

Sincerely, C

. i-

--A

?

Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards L

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

~~

Enclosure:

Request for Quotations I

k

F Mr. Walter P._Engle U.S. Department-of Energy NE-60 Washington, D.C.

20585

Dear Mr. Engle:

SUBJECT:

PCTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE ELECTRICAL E0VIPMENT L

In our continuing review:, of the records obtained from the five California com'panies, addition 61 invoices and orders have been found that identify Navy Department organizations / activities as the customer. A copy of each invoice / order is enclosed. These are in addition to the copies sent to you by letter dated July 29, 1988.

If there is any additional inferrr.ation you require, please call ne or Mr.

t' alter Haass et (301) 492-3219.

Sincerely, Orisical signed by hs1.ie K. Grunes Erian K. Grimes, Director Division of Reaction Inspection and Safeguards =

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

' Invoices / Orders Distribution:

(w/o enclosures)

JTaylor 05niezek TMartin BGrimes JStone WHaass-(w/ enclosures)

WMcNulty, RV (w/ enclosures)

KEccelston Central Files PDR DRIS R/F (w/ enclosures)

VIB R/F

&M t/A A MO

(?.

I o"T~""

in.,

A I

FC

VI y

R

V fM fiP.E :C "B: E15
D:

'I S AP,

r/f p --:BBrach g -:-

/- -----:--------------:-------------

p 7.-------:

.AME

t!

s s.inge otep f mp

.---.-:---------------$08///88 LATE

08//[ /88
08//)/88
08// ~l/E8

y p.

18, 1988 ]

4

+

August g

~ ' ' '

Mr. James H. Newton U.S. Coast Guard Office Symbol G.AS.4 Room 8304

2100 2nd Street, S.W.

+

Washington, D.C.-

20593 0001:

("

Dear Mr. Newton:

SUBJECT:

POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT in our continuing reviews of the records obtained from the five California companies, adcition61 invoices have been found that identify your agency as

.the customer._ A copy of each invoice is enclosed.

These are in addition to the copies sent to you by letter dated August 1, 1988.

If there is. any additional infomation you require, please call me or Mr.

Wal+.er Haass at (301) 492 3219.-

Sincerely, i

em oristeal samed by 1

houn K.crimo l

Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Re6ctor Inspection and Safeguards _

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1 Invoices Distribution:

(w/o enclosures) l JTaylor J$niezek TMartin-BGrimes WHaass (w/ enclosures).

i JStone l

1

'WMcNulty,RV(w/ enclosures)

KEccelston

li Central Files j

'PDR' J

NIB R/r

[

DRIS R/F (w/ enclosures)

J t

m.,,-m

. m i

W FW &# V Q

j f,

~

L OFC - :VI j

NRR
VI :
RR lC

'l 15

D-ihTR f.........:..

/.......:..............:.............

}

~

NAME: :W a :mgc

U ap -

.- :BBrach rimes

('

DATE :08//h/88

08//6 /88
08//>/88
08/ //88 4

R'k to

o

.\\.-

UNITED ST ATES

[

' 11 NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION

l 4

WASHWCTON, D C. 70665

_\\;

. j/*

August 18, 1988 9

Mr.-Robert B6rber U.S. Departnent of Energy

' Mail-Stop EH-34

-Germentown, Maryland 20674 4

Dear Mr.' Berber:

- SUBJECT POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT

~ 1n our continuing review 6f the recorcs obtained from the five California -

companies. adcitional invoices anc orders have been found that. identify DOI facilities as customers.

A copy of each-invoice'is enclosec. These are in aceition. to tne copies sent to you by' letter dated August 1,1988.'

'If there is'any adeitional information'you require, please call me or Mr. Walter Haass at'(301) 492-3219.

Sincerely, lf.'

+

A n

BrianKhGrimes. Director Division of: Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of huclear Reactor Regulation Enclosurei-Invoices / Orders gegun*& q q

4 L

1

~

~

~

O:

~

.~....;.,

[f

- UNITED STATE S,

[

-s i

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON D C.70665 A... + e'i -

August 18c 1988

- +

o Pd. George Roone,,

Associate Aon.inistrator,

-SRM &~0A

'Coce~0-NASA Headquarters Washington, D.C.

20S40

Dear Mr. Rodney:

SUBJECT:

POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMEhT

-l in our continuing. reviews:of the records obtained f rom the five California

, comp 6nies, additional invoices have been found that might involve either NASA or-your contractors.

A copy of each invoice is enclosec.

These invoices are in addition to the copies selit-to Mr. Forster Fournier by letter cated August 1,

~195E.

if there is any additional information you require, please call me'or Mr. Walter haass-at (301) 492-3219.

Sincerely, F'

M m

rian K. Grimes, Director Division of. Reactor Inspection:and Safeguards Dffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosure:

Invoices /orcers w w e# 1r 1

s

'2

. l*

\\

UNITED $TATts

- f

, j.

NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION

_g

  1. ASHINGT08v. D C. 70666

. %,, '*.... '/

l Auqrust 18;1988-

+

Colonel Brannam..

Headquarters U.S. Air Force

(USM/L Ei5)

.Pentagoa:

1 Weshington, D.C. - 20330 4 130

'l

Dear Colonel Brennam:

1 i

SUBJECT:

POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENI In our continuing reviews of the records obtained from-the five California.

companies, actitional invoices anc orders have been founc that ider.tify an?

. c:

- Air Force orgerd.zation/ activity as_ the customer.

enclosec.

A copy of each invoice is e invoices are in addition to the copies sent to you~ by letter dated August 1

lf there is any additional infomation you require, please call me or Mr. Walter beass at (301) 492-3219, Sincerely, C'

i MM rien K. Grimes, Director Division of Reactor Inspection'and Safeguares i

-Office of'huclear Reactor Regulation 4

Enclosure:

Invoices / Order 1

i A

V y

x

~

~

t o

!.+

August 18, 1988 i

Mr. Hershel Taylor U.S. Postal Service A75 L' Enfant Plaza. S.W.

Room 1012 Washington, D.C.

20260

Dear Mr. Taylor:

SUBJECT:

POTENTI ALLY DEFECTIVE ELECTRICAL E0VIPMENT

-In our continuing reviews of the records obtained from the five California companies, additional invoices and orders have been found that identify your agency as the customer.

A copy of each invoice is enclosec. These are in addition to the copies sent to you by letter dated August 1, 1960.

If there is any additional information you require, please call me or Mr.

W61ter Haass at (301) 492-3219.

Sincerely.

Orlaital $1smed by lsrlan 1 Grimo Brian K. Grimes, Director Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards fs Office of Nuclear Re6ctor Regulation

Enclosures:

Invoices /Drders Distribution: (w/o enclosures)

JTaylor JSnierek TMartin BGrimes JStont WHaass(w/ enclosures)

WMcNulty,RV(w/ecniosures)

]

KEccelston Central Files PDR DRIS R/F (w/ enclosures)

I NIB R/F g%f h'

2fBA-

., u

....:..............y.'. I '..*..... ::........ -..... ::..........

L:VIB/PRIS~
D i

0FC

VIB:

1 :hKR

VI) 5.NRR

...... :.. (i 3:

NAME : Whig mgc ~

V a v
BBrach

/*

ri.es

......:...fb...........;.............:..............:..............:....*....-..**.****.*******

DATE

08/ /BB
08//5 /88
08//7/8B
08/A /BP

=

t

/,..

'e, O

O UNITED STATES l'

'i NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMISSION

{

f wasmwovow.o e ross5 t

"%,,, /

August 18, 1988 Arizona Air National Guare 1560 East Valencia Tucson Arizona 85706

Dear Sir or Macam:

SUNECT :

P0TENilALLY DEFECTIVE REFURBISHED CIRCUIT BREAKERS The enclosed Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) Information Notice (IN) E,B-46 describes the circurrstances under which defective refurbished electrical equip-ment may have been supplied to nuclear power plants.

Our continuing investiga-tion of the five circuit breaker companies identified in the IN shows that the companies have shipped breakers to a number of government facilities and agencies.

Our reyttw of a sample of. invoices indicates that generally the breakers are sold to a distributor, and it was only the occasional shi ment direct to the end user that pemitted us to identify the final government destination.

I have enclosed a copy of an invoice that identifies your agency as the This document results from our review of a selection of records customer.

sp6nning the last two or three years from all of the companies.

As other records

+

are reviewed, we will provide any additional infomation that comes to light.

Powever, since some of-the companies have been in business for as many as 30 i

years, a full historical records search will not be possible.

The five California companies appear to sell surplus new as well 6s refurbished breakers.

However, their refurbished equipment may be shipped in cont:iners resembling original manufacturer containers.

If.there is any additional infomation you require, please call nic or Mr. Walter Haass'at (301) 492-3219.

Sincerely, j

C fpi l

Trian K. Grimes, Director Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1.

hRC Information Notice (IN) 88-4E r

2.

Invoice gun

\\

0 4-Pf

'\\,

l A

O e

[f

~ '<.

e umito sT Af t s j

v, NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMi&SION f

eas e ctow.o e u m

(,j August 18, 1988

]

l i

i l

o 6.'6thington Suburban Sanitary Comission Purchasing Office i

4101 Lloyd Street Hyattsville, Maryland 207El 1

f

Dear Sir or Madar:

$UBJECT:

POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE REFURBISHED CIRCull tREAKERS l

t The enclosed Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) Infomation Notice (lN) 86-40 describes the circumstances under which defective refurbished electrical equip-faent may have been gypplied to nuclear power plants. Our continuing investige-tion of the five circuit breaker companies identified in the IN shows that the companies have shipped breakers to a number of government facilities and agencies. Our review of a sample of invoices indicates that generally the breakers are sold to a distributor, and it was only the occasional shipment direct to the end user that pemitted us to identify the final government destination.

I have enclosed a copy of an invoice that identifies your agency as the customer. This document results from our review of a selection of records spanning the last two or three years from all of the companies. As other records are reviewed, we will provide any additiunal infomation that comes to light.

However, since some of the companies have been in business for as many as 30 years, a full historical records search will not be possible.

F The five California companies appear to sell surplus new as well as refurbished breakers. however, their refurbished equipment may be shipped in containers resembling original manufacturer containers.

-If there is any 6dditional inforniation y5u require, please call me or Mr. Walter Haass'at (301) 492-3219.

p Sincerely, a

79 c

(

a

-~

^-)

Brian K. Grimes Director 45 g*

Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards

.J g,e Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation i

L

Enclosures:

r i

1.

NRC Information Notice (IN) BB 46 2.

Invoice k

L 1

o

7[...s's, o

umTED sT Af ts j

NUCLE AR REGUL ATORY COMMIS$lON i

(

)

map iivctov o e tosss j

(.

j/

A quet 18, 1988 l

  • ...+

t;ew York Air National Guard Schenectacy County Airport A.h.G. Road l

Building 25 B.C.E.

Scotia, hew York 12302 1

Dear Sir or Madam-SUBJEC1:

POTEhTIALLY DEFECTIVE REFURBISHED CIRCULI BREAKERS

{

The encieseo Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) Infomation kotice (!N) 88 4C describes the circumstances under which defective refurbished electrical equip-ment mey have been supplied to nuclear power plants. Our continuing investiga-tior, of the five cT?cuit breaker companies identified in the IN shows that the companies heve shipped breakers to a number of government facilities and I

agencies. Our review of a sample of invoices indicates that generally the breakers are sold to a distributor, and it was only the occasional shipment direct to the end user that permitted us to identify the final government l

destination.

I have enclosed a copy of an invoice that identifies your agency as the customer. This document was found during our review of a selection of records spanning the last two or three years from all of the companies. As other records i

are reviewed, we will provide any additional infomation that comes to light.

l However, since some of the companies have been in business for as many as 30 years, a full historical records strarch will not be possible.

)

u The five California corrpanies appear to sell surplus new as well as refurbished t

breakers.

However, their refurbished equipment may be shipped in containers resembling original manufacturer containers.

If. there is any additional information you require, please call me or

.i Mr. Walter Haass at (301) 492-3219.

Sincerely, C,

y

/

e I

Brian K. Grimes Director ap AJd' Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards j

$vv d' f A h Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

{

l

&\\

Enclosures:

1.

NRCInformationhotice(lN)08-46 2.

Invoice

~

____ _ _ __j

h

,, tg.* cg't.

UMTE D SToTE s NUCLE AR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION y

E y

masmewctoh.D C 70bbt.

(

,/

August 18, 1988 Arizona National Guard 565C East McDoncil building 101 Photr.ix, Aritor.e E5600

Dear Sir or Madat:

SUEJECT:

PDTEhTIALLY DEFECTIVE REFUREISHED CIRCULI BREAKERS The enclosec huclear Regulatory Comission (NPC) Infomation Notice (lh) 88 46 describes the circumstances under which defective refurbished electrical ecuip.

ment may have been supplied to nuclear power plants. Our continuing investiga-tion of the five circuit breaker Companies identified in tht IN shows that the companies have shipftd breakers to a number of government facilities and agencies. Our review of a sample of invoices indicates that generally the breakers are sold to a distributor, and it was only the occasional shipment direct to the end user that permitted us to identify the final government destination.

I have enclosed 6 copy of an invoice that identifies your agency as the customer. This cocument results from our review of a selection of records t

spanning the last two or three years from all of the. companies.

As other records are reviewed, we will provide any additional infomation that comes to light.

4 however, since some of the companies have been in business for as many as 30 years, a full historical records seerch will not be possible.

The five California companies appear to sell surplus new as well as refurbished breakers. However, their refurbished equipment m6y be shipped in containers resembling original manuf acturer containers.

If there is any additional infomation you require, please call me or Mr. Walter Haass at (301) 49?-3219.

Sincerely, l

.sA,.

M' i

l

\\

i Brian K. Grimes, Director OO Division of Reactur inspection and Safeguards J

V '

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1.

hRC Inform 6 tion Notice (lh) 86-46 2.-

Invoice

O O

\\

f[...... 'c, UNITE D ST Att s y~

'r NUCLE AR REGUL ATORY COMMISSION j

v, ]

u smwctow.o e 30555 i

5g. v#

9.,,;.

Aupst 18,1988

^

-University of Missouri 125 General Services Boulevard Columbia, Mis 5ouri 65211

Dear Sir or Macat:

SUBJECT:

POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE REFURBISHED CIRCUIT BREAKERS The enclosec Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC) Infomation Notice (!N) BE.4C l

describes the circumstances under which defectivt refurbished electrical equip.

I ment may have bett, supplied to nuclear power plants. Our continuing investiga-tion of the five circuit breaker companies identified in the 1N shows that the companies have shipped breakers to a number of government f acilities and agencies..Our review cf a sample of invoices indicates that generally the breakers are sold to a distributor, and it was only the occasional shipment direct to the end user that permitted us to identify the final government

.de s t i na ti or..

I have enclosed a copy of a statement that identifies your agency as the

' customer. This documera results from our review of a selection of records i

spanning the last two or three years from all of the companies. As other records are reviewed, we will provide any additional infomation that comes to light.

However, since some of the companies have been in business for as many as 30 years, a full historical records search will not be possible.

The five California companies appear to sell surplus new as well as refurbished breakers. However, their refurbished equipnient may be shipped in containers resembling original manufacturer containers, if there is any additional information you require, please call me or l

Mr. Walter haass at (301) 492-3219.

t Sincerely, 0

C.

~

\\

F.rian K. Griraes. Director Division of Re6ctor Inspection and Safeguares Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

~

1.

NRC Information Notice (IN) BE-A6 2.

Invoice n

m.~nsene

. y-u a

,ef

  • 'c, UNITE D sT ATt s

[

,. t,

NUCLE AR REGUL ATORY COMMIS$10N j

mAsmwotow.o c.tosu g

\\'....e i

August 18, 1988 1

State Military Department Carip Withy Cot.te Building 515 Clachees, Oregon 97015

Dear Sir or Madam:

$UBJECT:

POTENTIALLY DEFECTIVE REFURB15HED CIRCU11 BREAKERS i

i TheenclosedNuciterRegulatoryConrission(hRC)InformationNotice(lk)8840 cescribes the circumstances under which defective refurbished electrical equip.

l ment may have'been supplied to nuclear power plants.

Our continuing investige.

i tion of the five circuit breaker cortpanies identified in the IN shows that the companies have shipped breakers to a number of government facilities and agencies. Our review of a sample of invoices indicates that generally the breakers are sold to a distributor, and it was only the occasional shipment direct to the end user that permitted us to identify the final government destination.

I have enclosed a copy of an invoice that identifies your agency as the customer. This document results from our review of a selection of records spanning the last two or three years from all of the companies.

As other records are reviewed, we will provide any additional information that comes to light. However, since some of the companists have been in business for as many as 30 years, a full historical records search will not be possible.

The five California companies appear to sell surplus new as well as refurbished breakers. However, their refurbished equipment may be shipped in containers resembling original manufacturer containers.

i If there is any additional infor1 nation you require, please call me or 1

Mr. Walter Haass at (301) 492-3219.

J Sincerely,

/

e

.. +

l rian K. Grimes, Director Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards l

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulatica

Enclosures:

1.

NRC Information hotice (IN) 88-46 2.

Invoice l

wueest 4-g l'

.1

n.

Defense Logistics Agency Headquarters,DLA.QL APE I 2 I m,,,

Cameron Station Alexandria, Virgiriia 22304

Dear Sir /Hadam:

SUBJECT:

POTENTIALLY OEFECTIVE REFURBISHED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT In our continuing investigation to identify the circumstances under which defective refurbished electrical equipment may have been supplied to nuclear power plants, we have discovercd additional irivoices and orders that specify your agency as the customer.

Copies cf these invoices and orders are attachtd

~,

for your information and use. These documents result from our review of a selectici of records spanning tht last three or four years from companies supplying molded case circuit breakers listed in NRC Inferration Notice 88 46, a copy of which is enclosed for your information. As other records come to light, we will provide copies to your of fice as appropriate.

If there is any additional information you require, please call me or Mr. Walter Haass at (301) 492 3219.

Sincerely, Ori ir.al sirrd by t

Brian K. Gnmes Brian K. Grimes Director Division of Reactor Inspection and Safeguards Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

1.

Irivoices/ Orders 2.

NRC Inferr.htion Notice 88 46 and Supplements 1 and 2 DISTRIBUTION: (w/oenclosures)

Lentrol files KEccelston VIBReading(w/ enclosures)

WHutchinson. 01 DRIS Reading (w/ enclosures)

WMcNulty,01.RV(w/ enclosures)

JSnierek PDR FMiraglia BGrimes EBrach GCwelina

[

WHaass(w/ enclosures)

JStone

'SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE PAGE.

i\\

DFC :VID:DRl5

5C:Vlb:DR15 :BC:VIB:DRIS :D:DRIS l.....:..............:.............:............:............:............:............:........

NAME :WPHaass:jh*

CCCwaline
EWBrach
BKGrimes*

DATE :04/03/09

04/05/69
04/05/89
04/06/89

' = ^ ~

cn n s n o

~ Q-pyvy += W3 / 7

..-