ML20002E242
| ML20002E242 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 12/10/1980 |
| From: | Davis A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Crouse R TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20002E243 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8101260720 | |
| Download: ML20002E242 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000346/1980031
Text
T/ G
/,+m coq'o
UNITED STATES
k
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
^
n
'
.E
REGION 111
W
799 ROOSEVELT ROAD
-%
GLEN ELLYN,lLLINOIS 60137
- ..*
DEC 1 0 1980
Docket No. 50-346
G
.,
g
.
Toledo Edison Company
p
g
ATTN:
Mr. Richard P. Crouse
Sc
,
,
Vice President
b
r$. _
R
m
.
Nuclear
'
j
Edison Plaza
[j%d
N.
@(
300 Madison Avenue
1
[
Q
Toledo, OH 43652
p.,
E
-
m
w
-
Gentlemen:
n
This refers to the routine inspection conducted by Messrs. W. Axelson,
C. J. Paperiello, Ph.D. and Ms. N. A. Nicholson of this office and other
NRC observers on November 5-7, 1980, of activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear
Station authorized by NRC Operating License No. hPF-3 and to the discussion
of our findings with you and other members of your staff at the conclusion
of the inspection.
The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas ex:. mined
during the inspection. Within these areas, the intpection consisted of a
selective examination of procedures and represer.:.ative records, observations,
and interviews with personnel.
No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified during
the inspection.
During the critiques of the exercise conducted by the NRC, your staff and the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, one problem area identified by all
participants was poor communications between various Toledo Edison groups,
and Toledo Edison and state and local government organizations. During
our meeting with your staff on November 6, 1980, we identified thic as
apparently resulting from lack of training of your cocununicators and not
an equipment problem.
In your reply to this letter please tell us what
action you plan to take to improve communications between the above
groups and the date when this will be accomplished.
Other deficiencies were discussed with your staff at the above meeting
and are included in our enclosed report.
Please provide us with a copy
of your written critique of the drill along with your corrective actions.
If one is not yet available please tell us by what date it will be available.
Please provide the above information witnin twenty-five days of receipt
of this letter.
0 1 0 : 'l G C h 0
.
Toledo Edison Company
-2-
DEC 10 W
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,
Title 10,_ Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter, the enclosures,
and your response to this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public
Document Room, except as follows.
If the enclosures contain information
that you or your contractors. believe to be proprietary, you must apply in
writing to this office, within twenty-five days of the date of this
letter, to withhold such information from public disclosure. The application
must include a full statement of the reasons for which the information is
considered proprietary, and should be prepared so that proprietary information
identified in the application is contained in an enclosure to the application.
We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.
Sincerely,
cWova-~-r>
_
s
A. B.-Davis, Chief
Fuel Facility and
Materials Safety Branch
Enclosure:
IE Inspection Report
No. 50-346/80-31
cc w/ enc 1:
T. D. Murray, Station
Superintendent
Central Files
Reproduction Unit NRC 20b
-
AE0D
Resident Inspector, RIII
Local PDR
Harold W. Kohn, Power
Siting Commission
Helen W. Evans, State of Ohio
)