Text

BTP Option 2 On-Site Site Disposal Cell Report for Cimarron Corporations Former Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Facility Crescent, Ok
	ML19364A238
Person / Time
Site:	07000925
Issue date:	11/22/2019
From:	; Cimarron Corp
To:	; Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML19365A023	List: ML19361A179; ML19363A001; ML19363A002; ML19363A003; ML19363A004; ML19363A005; ML19363A006; ML19363A007; ML19363A008; ML19363A009; ML19363A010; ML19363A011; ML19363A013; ML19363A014; ML19363A015; ML19363A016; ML19364A126; ML19364A231; ML19364A232; ML19364A233; ML19364A234; ML19364A235; ML19364A236; ML19364A237; ML19364A238; ML19364A239;
References
	Download: ML19364A238 (79)
	v • d • e

BTP OPTION 2 ON-SITE DISPOSAL CELL REPORT FOR CIMARRON CORPORATION'S FORMER NUCLEAR FUEL FABRICATION FACILITY CRESCENT,OKLAHOMA LICENSE NUMBER: SNM-928 PREPARED FOR CIMARRON CORPORATION OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA DECEMBER 2001

TABLE OF CONTENTS ATTACHMENTS............................................................................................................................ i REFERENCES............................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 PURPOSE........................................................................................................................... 1

2.0 BACKGROUND

................................................................................................................ 1 3.0 RADIOLOGICAL GUIDELINE VALUES....................................................................... 2 3.1.

Option 1 Material............................................................................................................ 2 3.2.

Option 2 Material............................................................................................................ 2 3.3.

Option 4 Material............................................................................................................ 3 3.4.

Thorium-bearing Materials............................................................................................. 3 4.0 CHARACTERIZATION METHOD.................................................................................. 3 4.1 Stockpile Characterization Method................................................................................. 3 4.2 In-situ Lift Characterization Method.............................................................................. 5 4.3 Surface Survey................................................................................................................ 7 5.0 OPTION 2 WASTE PLACEMENT................................................................................... 7 5.1 Cell Construction............................................................................................................ 7 5.2 Run-On/R.un-OffControl................................................................................................ 8 5.3 Waste Transported to Cell.............................................................................................. 8 5.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control................................................................................. 9 6.0 CHARACTERIZATION DAT A...................................................................................... 10 6.1 Analytical Sampling Results......................................................................................... 10 6.2 Survey Results.............................................................................................................. 11 7.0 CELL CLOStJRE............................................................................................................. 11 8.0 FINAL CERTIFICATION................................................................................................ 12

Appendix I Appendix II Appendix III Appendix IV Appendix V Appendix VI ATTACHMENTS Final Status Survey Plan Drawing As-Built Drawings (Includes Waste Placement)

Standard Proctor Tests Waste Compaction Test Results Cap Compaction Test Results Final Cap Contour Drawing 1

REFERENCES

1. Sequoyah Fuels Corporation letter from J. C. Stauter, Director Nuclear Licensing &

Regulation to Bruce S. Mallet, Chief, Materials Licensing Section, Region m, USNRC, dated September 4, 1987.

2. USNRC, "Branch Technical Position on Disposal or On-Site Storage of Residual Thorium and Uranium From Past Operations", FR. Vol. 46, No. 205, Page 52061, October 23, 1981.

3. Sequayoh Fuels Corporation letter from John C. Stauter, Director Nuclear Licensing &

Regulation to Leland C. Rouse, Chief Uranium Fuel Licensing Branch, USNRC, dated June 29, 1988.

4. James L. Grant and Associates, Inc., 1989, "Site Investigation Report for the Cimarron Corporation Facility, Logan County, Oklahoma."

5. James L. Grant and Associates, Inc., 1990, "Cimarron Facility Closure Response to NRC Questions."

6. USNRC letter from John H. Austin, Chief, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch to Dr. Jolm C. Stauter, Kerr-McGee Corporation, dated November 4, 1994.

7. Outreach Laboratory letter from Ronald R. Eidson, Laboratory Director to Mickey Hodo, Cimarron Corporation, dated April 21, 1997.

8. Kerr-McGee Corporation letter from Edwin T. Still, Vice President and Director, to John H.

Austin, Chief, Low-Level Waste Management and Decommissioning Projects Branch, dated May 31, 1994.

9. Chase Environmental Group, Inc., "Radiological Characterization Report for Cimarron Corporation's Former Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Facility, Crescent, Oklahoma," October 1994.

10. J. D. Berger, "Manual for Conducting Radiological Surveys in Support of License Termination"; Draft Report for Comment, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, NUREG/CR-5849, June 1992.

11. Kerr-McGee Corporation letter from Edwin T. Still, Vice President and Director to John H.

Austin, Chief, Low-Level Waste Management and Decommissioning Projects Branch, USNRC, dated June 15, 1994.

12. A.J. Ansari, "Confirmatory Survey of Two Soil Piles Proposed for On-Site Storage, Kerr-McGee Corporation, Cimarron Facility, Crescent, Oklahoma," ORISE, October 1994 (Final Report).

11

13. Cimarron Corporation, letter from John C. Stauter, Ph.D., Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, to John H. Austin, Chief, Low-Level Waste Management and Decommissioning.

Projects Branch, dated November 15, 1994.

14. USNRC letter from David N. Fauver, Sr., Project Manager, Low-Level Waste Management and Decommissioning Projects Branch, to Dr. John C. Stauter, Kerr-McGee Corporation, dated February 16, 1995.

15. Cimarron Corporation, letter from Jess Larsen, Vice-President, Cimarron Corporation to Michael F. Weber, Chief, Low-Level Waste Management and Decommissioning Projects Branch, USNRC, dated April 7, 1995.

16. USNRC letter from Michael F. Weber, Chief, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, to Jess Larsen, Vice President, Kerr-McGee Corporation, dated May 31, 1995.

17. Cimarron Corporation letter from Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation to Michael F. Weber, USNRC, dated June 28, 1996.

18. USNRC letter from Kenneth Kalman, Project Manager, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, to Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron. Corporation, dated August 15, 1996.

19. Cimarron Corporation letter from Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation to Ken Kalman, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, USNRC, dated April 25, 1996.

20. USNRC letter from Kenneth L. Kalman, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch to Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, dated June 10, 1996.

21. Kerr-McGee Corporation letter from John C. Stauter to Ken Kalman, Project Manager, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, USNRC, dated April 18, 1997.

22. USNRC letter from Kenneth L. Kalman, Project Manager, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch to Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, dated August 7, 1997.

23. Cimarron Corporation letter from Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, to Kenneth Kalman, Project Manager, Facilities Decommissioning Section, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, USNRC, dated October 30, 1997.

24. Cimarron Corporation letter from Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, to Kenneth Kalman, Project Manager, Facilities Decommissioning Section, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, USNRC, dated February 26, 1998.

iii

25. Cimarron Corporation letter from Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, to Kenneth Kalman, Project Manager, Facilities Decommissioning Section, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, USNRC, dated February 1, 1999.

26. USNRC letter from Kenneth L. Kalman, Project Manager, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, to Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, dated April 13, 1998.

27. USNRC letter from Kenneth L. Kalman, Project Manager, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, to Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, dated September 10, 1998.

28. USNRC letter from Kenneth L. Kalman, Project Manager, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, to Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, dated May 4, 1999.

29. Cimarron Corporation letter from Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, to Kenneth Kalman, Project Manager, Facilities Decommissioning Section, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, USNRC, dated June 16, 2000.

30. USNRC letter from Larry W. Camper, Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management, to Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, dated June 26, 2000.

31. Cimarron Facsimile from W. A. Rogers to Ken Kalman, dated July 7, 2000.

32. Cimarron Corporation letter from Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, to Kenneth Kalman, Project Manager, Facilities Decommissioning Section, Low-Level Waste and Decommissioning Projects Branch, USNRC, dated July 26, 2000.

33. Kerr-McGee Corporation, "Radiological Characterization Report for Asphalt Material-Uranium Yard Area," dated January 1998.

34. USNRC letter from Larry W. Camper, Chief, Decommissioning Branch, Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, to Mr. Jess Larsen, Vice President, Cimarron Corporation, dated November 13, 2000.

35. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Testing Procedure D698.

IV

BTP Option 2 On-Site Disposal Cell Report 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this Report is to summarize the characterization data for the materials placed into the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) approved BTP Option 2 On-Site Disposal Cell located on the Cimarron facility. Also included is a discussion of the procedures utilized by Cimarron Corporation for material characterization and placement and for cell closure. The numerous reports and NRC approvals required to complete the placement of the Option 2 materials into the disposal cell are referenced. This Report represents the certification that the Option 2 soils were placed into the disposal cell in accordance with SNM License-928 Condition 23.

2.0 BACKGROUND

Cimarron Corporation, a subsidiary of Kerr-McGee Corporation, operated a Facility near Crescent, Oklahoma, for the manufacture of enriched uranium fuels.

The 840-acre Cimarron Facility was issued SNM License-928 in 1965. This Facility operated until 1975, at which time it was shut down and decommissioning initiated.

Decommissioning efforts which included characterization, decontamination, remediation, and surveying for the 840 acres licensed under SNM-928 were initiated in 1976 and are nearing completion. An integral part of the decommissioning process was the on-site disposal of soil and construction debris which contained slightly elevated levels of uranium.

On September 4, 19871, Cimarron Corporation submitted a license amendment request to the NRC for on-site disposal of soils and incidental construction debris containing uranium and thorium meeting the BTP2 Option 2 criteria. In June 19883, Cimarron resubmitted the license amendment request based upon the NRC's petition for additional information. The 1988 amendment request was supplemented in October 19894 with further information including an extensive site investigation report dealing with regional and site geology and hydrology.

In 19905, the site investigation report was again supplemented with additional site information including a pathways analysis.

On November 4, 19946, the NRC issued Amendment #10 to License SNM-928, approving on-site disposal ofup to 500,000 fl:3 of Option 2 materials.

While awaiting approval from the NRC for on-site disposal and as part of the decommissioning process, Cimarron personnel excavated, sorted, and stockpiled Option 2 materials in anticipation of disposing of these materials on-site. Additionally, Cimarron personnel constructed the first (Pit #1) of the three pits comprising the on-site disposal cell previously referred to as Burial Area #4 and herein referred to as the Cell. The location of the Cell is shown on Drawing No. 95 M0ST-RF3 included in Appendix I.

1

Under the original procedure for stockpiling soils and debris contaminated with enriched uranium, Cimarron personnel performed an initial characterization of an area, and if required, excavated and separated the soils utilizing a Nal "dirt probe" into BTP Option I, 2, or 4 classifications. The BTP Option I materials were left in place; Option 2 materials were placed in a stockpile as they were removed from an active remediation area. This allowed for final characterization of BTP Option 2 materials in the stockpile prior to future placement into the Cell. BTP Option 4 materials we:re packaged for shipment off-site to a LLRW disposal facility. As remediation progressed to the point that the Facility was running out of areas for stockpiling soil, a procedural change was necessary. This change entailed transporting the soils directly to the Cell and completing characterization sampling in the Cell.

3.0 RADIOLOGICAL GUIDELINE VALUES As discussed, Amendment #106 to Cimarron's License SNM-928 approved the on-site disposal of up to 500,000 ft3 of BTP Option 2 materials. The guideline values for enriched uranium as specified by the BTP are:

Option I - concentrations up to and including 30 pCi/g above background; Option 2-greater than 30 and up to 250 pCi/g above background; and Option 4 - concentrations greater than 250 pCi/ g above background.

3.1.

Option 1 Material The Option 1 materials with concentrations of 30 pCi/ g total uranium above background or less were authorized to be left in place.

3.2.

Option 2 Material The Option 2 value provides for burial on-site for soil and incidental construction debris with enriched uranium up to an average concentration of 100 pCi/g for 100% soluble uranium and up to 250 pCi/g for insoluble uranium. Materials are to be disposed at a depth of four feet with no restriction on the future use of the property.

Soils contaminated with uranium in the Option 2 range were sorted by Cimarron personnel prior to being placed into the Cell.

The guideline values used by Cimarron for Option 2 materials when determining the soil category was the concentration limit for 100% soluble uranium (i.e., 100 pCi/g total uranium above background). Cimarron had submitted the results of leaching analyses, simulated lung fluid solubility analyses, and Kd determinations that showed the average solubility well below 50% 7* However, in an effort to begin placement of Option 2 material into the Cell, and with the absence of an "NRC approved" solubility test method, Cimarron agreed to meet the lower soluble Option 2 limit of 100 pCi/g8 total uranium when disposing of material on site. Additionally, hot spot averaging can be applied to 2

any location within a 100 m2 grid area which contains soil concentrations in excess of the 100 pCi/g limit stated above. The maximum total uranium soil concentration for any "hot spot" location within a 100 m2 grid area may not exceed three times the BTP Option 2 limit for 100% soluble uranium.

3.3.

Option 4 Material Soils with uranium concentrations in the Option 4 range were packaged and shipped to an,

off-site licensed low-level radioactive waste disposal facility.

3.4.

Thorium-bearing Materials During site decommissioning, the soil samples were analyzed for natural thorium and the results included in the characterization reports.

Thorium-bearing materials from a different Kerr-McGee operation off-site were previously disposed in on-site Burial Ground #1. As discussed in the 1994 Facility Characterization Report9, this material was previously excavated and shipped for disposal off-site.

In accordance with SNM-928 License Condition #23, the guideline value for on-site disposal of thorium contaminated soils is 10 pCi/g.

4.0 CHARACTERIZATION METHOD As discussed in Section 2.0, in general two methods were used to characterize the Option 2 materials placed into the Cell. The original method entailed characterization in the stockpile and NRC approval prior to being placed into the Cell. The final method included placement of the materials into the Cell, followed by characterization and subsequent NRC approval. The characterization of the small volumes of Option 2 soil placed into Pit #3, Lift #5 included a combination of stockpile sampling prior to soil placement and lift sampling after soil placement.

4.1 Stockpile Characterization Method During site remediation, soils were initially sorted into Options 1, 2 or 4 materials using a combination of surface scans, soil sampling and "dirt probing". Areas with known or suspected soil contamination were identified by either Na! detector field instruments or bore hole sampling and gamma logging. Soils with uranium concentrations exceeding 30 pCi/g were excavated with mechanical equipment (e.g., backhoe or front-end loader buckets). Each bucket load was probed with a one and one-half inch by four inch Nal detector encased in a two-inch plastic tube (PVC pipe) prior to stockpiling.

The Option 2 materials were accumulated into stockpiles for final characterization. Each stockpile was gridded on a 5 meter by 5 meter spacing, using the fixed reference point previously established for the facility. A stockpile was scanned at the surface and at one-3

meter above the surface with a Micro-R instrument. The surface was also scanned with a shielded three inch by half inch NaI detector. Bore holes were drilled into the stockpile and soil samples were obtained over each half meter interval for gamma spectra analysis and count rate data were obtained at each half meter interval using the dirt probe. The half-meter soil samples were composited for analysis on-site.

The methodology in NUREG/CR-584910 was used to verify that the average activity in any 100 m2 by half-meter in depth contiguous soil volumes were within the guidance value. The average concentrations determined in this manner were compared to the guidance value for the 100 m2 area. The individual sample data, statistical summaries, and graphic displays were submitted to the NRC for review and approval.

Soil samples collected were analyzed on-site using the multi-channel analyzer and an EG&G Ortec Abeam Computer Analysis Program. The detector is a 4 inch by 4 inch by 16 inch sodium iodide crystal. Typically, a 500 ml sample bottle of soil is placed on a turntable (1 RPM) inside a lead lined cabinet. The count data obtained from the emitted radiation (gamma spectra) of the soil sample were printed out for documentation. The multi-channel analyzer was source checked daily using a Cs-137 pencil source to verify proper peak placement in the channels of interest. A uranium soil standard with average concentration of 28. 7 pCi/g uranium and a background standard with average 4.5 pCi/g uranium were counted daily to ensure 95% confidence level parameters.

Four stockpiles (referred to as DAP-1 through DAP-4) of BTP Option 2 materials were accumulated northeast and east of the Uranium Plant Building and were characterized by Cimarron personnel. The first two stockpiles (i.e., DAP-1 and DAP-2) of Option 2 material were characterized in 1994 by Cimarron personnel with a report submitted to the NRC by letter dated June 15, 199411* Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) performed a confirmatory survey and sampling effort on the two piles and submitted a report12 of their findings to the NRC. Based upon the ORISE confirmatory sample results, a high bias was identified in Cimarron's sample results for soils above 100 pCi/g total uranium. Cimarron recalibrated the on-site soil counter and recounted those samples with the projected high bias. By letter dated November 15, 199413, Cimarron submitted the revised data including additional sampling for several areas that required limited remediation. Subsequently DAP-1 and DAP-2 were approved for on-site disposal by the NRC by letter dated February 16, 199514 and were moved to the Cell for placement in Pit #1. A total of six lifts were placed into this pit.

The DAP-3 soil stockpile was sampled in December 1994 by Cimarron personnel with the Characterization Report forwarded to the NRC by letter dated April 7, 199515*

ORISE performed a confirmatory survey and sampling effort on DAP-3 and submitted a report of their findings to the NRC. DAP-3 was approved for on-site disposal by NRC letter dated May 31, 199516 and was subsequently moved to the Cell for placement in Pit

2.

Accumulation of Stockpile DAP-4 was started in 1995. This stockpile also was located in the Uranium Plant Yard. Prior to placement of the contaminated material from DAP-4 4

into the Cell, Cimarron performed a characterization of the materials in accordance with the guidance contained in NUREG/CR-584910* The procedures used for this characterization were identical to those reviewed and approved by the NRC for stockpiles DAP-1, DAP-2 and DAP-3.

Cimarron presented its characterization data for DAP-4 to the NRC for review by letter dated June 28, 199617* The NRC staff, after review of the characterization data and based upon Cimarron's acceptable performance on the three other stockpiles, approved18 disposal of the Option 2 material without confirmatory sampling by ORISE. The soils in DAP-4 were disposed in Pit #2; these soils completed the filling of Pit #2. A total of six lifts were placed into this pit.

4.2 In-situ Lift Characterization Method As site decommissioning progressed to the point that the Facility was running out of areas for placement of soils in stockpiles, Cimarron requested a procedural change to the method utilized for material characterization. The April 25, 199619 letter from Cimarron to the NRC addressed the proposed procedural change for placement of materials into Pit

3.

The change to the original method entailed transporting the sorted BTP Option 2 materials directly to Pit #3 of the Cell. Once in the pit, the materials were unloaded, spread and partially compacted. Once the lift had been placed, the material was sampled on a 5-meter by 5-meter grid. Soil samples were collected through the entire thickness of the lift and composited for analysis with the on-site soil counter. Any areas exceeding the BTP Option 2 limit (i.e., 100 pCi/g total uranium) were reviewed to determine if the "hot spot" average exceeded the guidelines. In addition, any areas exceeding the "hot spot" average or three times the guideline value were removed and packaged for off-site disposal. After the data review was completed, the lift was compacted to an approximate 1 foot lift and to obtain 95% of the Standard Proctor dry density as required This procedural change was approved by the NRC by letter dated June 10, 199620*

Per the June 1020 letter, the NRC stated that pending the results of its' review of data and activities associated with the emplacement of the first lift in Pit #3, NRC staff would provide guidance for all subsequent lifts. Cimarron's characterization data for Lift #1 were submitted to the NRC by letter dated April 18, 199721

NRC Region IV inspectors were on-site during the sampling phase for this lift and split samples with Cimarron.

Based upon the results of the March 26, 199?22 site inspection and sampling event, the NRC staff approved placement of Lift #1 and stated that it was unnecessary to perform confirmatory sampling for each subsequent lift. However, the NRC did request that Cimarron take the following actions:

Cimarron should provide the NRC project manager with at least seven (7) days notice before beginning emplacement of soil in each lift along with an estimate of when emplacement in that lift will be completed.

5

Cimarron should submit to NRC staff final survey data for each lift as soon as possible. These data need not be in final report form, but should undergo a QA review before it is submitted to NRC staff; and Cimarron should retain 20 randomly selected split samples from each lift for possible NRC analysis.

These actions were followed by Cimarron during the placement of all subsequent materials into Pit #3.

The characterization data for Lift #2 was submitted to the NRC by letter dated October 30, 199723; Lift #3 data was submitted by letter dated February 26, 199824; and Lift #4 data was submitted by letter dated February 1, 199925.

Even though the NRC had determined that it was unnecessary to perform confirmatory sampling on each lift, NRC staff collected and analyzed split soil samples from Lift's #2, #3, and #4. Based upon the results of the NRC's data reviews and inspections, approvals were granted to continue the placement ofBTP Option 2 soil in Pit #3. The NRC letter approvals were dated April 3, 199826, September 10, 199827 and May 4, 199928, respectively for the three subsequent lifts. The analytical data from these sampling events confirmed no* significant bias or statistical errors between Cimarron's and NRC's results; soils placed in Pit #3 were well within the concentration limits for BTP Option 2 on-site disposal.

As site remediation continued, a small volume of Option 2 material was stockpiled in Pit

3 for placement in Lift #5. Remediation had progressed to the point that all identified areas of elevated activity had been excavated. Lift #5 would be a partial lift that included both soil and asphalt. For this lift, the volume of Option 2 soil remaining to be placed into Pit #3 would equate to a height substantially less than the one-foot required for compaction and testing. Cimarron proposed a modified approach for soil testing than had been previously utilized. Additionally, the asphalt which was scheduled to be placed into this last lift, had been extensively characterized and required no further analyses. These two circumstances dictated an alternate approach for characterization, waste placement, and final compaction. The proposed approach was discussed in Cimarron's June 16, 200029 letter to the NRC.

The alternate approach for Lift #5 soil placement requested by Cimarron included testing the Option 2 soils in the stockpile prior to placement at a frequency greater than if it were to be placed and then tested. By letter dated June 26, 200030, NRC staff agreed with Cimarron's approach for the testing of the remaining stockpiled Option 2 soils to be spread as Lift #5 in the Cell.

The small stockpiled Option 2 soils were sampled for analyses and subsequently spread over a portion of the Cell in an approximate six-inch thick compacted lift. The analytical results which were sent to the NRC by facsimile on July 7, 200031 showed several results above 200 pCi/g total uranium. Additional sampling of the soil which had been spread confirmed the locations which contained elevated levels of uranium. In discussions with the NRC, Cimarron agreed to remove soil from Lift #5 at locations where the elevated 6

levels were located, to regrade the lift, and sample again on a 5 meter grid. A total of 10-55-gallon drums of soil were removed and shipped to an off-site LLRW disposal facility.

The results of the five meter grid sampling event were submitted to the NRC by letter dated July 26, 200032 and showed a mean activity of 29.5 pCi/g total uranium with a standard deviation of 16.2 pCi/g. The highest recorded soil activity was 106 pCi/g total uranium, which was "hot spot" averaged to 45 pCi/g.

The asphalt was placed in an approximate six inch uncompacted lift adjacent to the soil.

The characterization for the asphalt was documented to the NRC in the January 1998 Radiological Characterization Report33*

This characterization data verified that the asphalt was Option 1 material. Both the asphalt and soil were left uncovered for NRC's inspection and subsequent confirmatory sampling which was performed on August 15, 2000. The results of the sampling confirmed Cimarron's results and by November 13, 200034 letter, the NRC authorized covering the partial lifts of soil and asphalt with radiologically "clean" fill. With this approval, Cimarron was in position to complete closure of the Cell.

4.3 Surface Survey After placement of the final lift of Option 2 material in each pit, a 100% surface scan was completed with the survey measurements collected at the surface with a micro-R meter.

5.0 OPTION 2 WASTE PLACEMENT The placement of Option 2 materials into the Cell was approved based upon Cimarron taking steps to reduce the potential for future subsidence. Subsidence will be precluded by the nature of the materials placed in the Cell and the application of sound construction practices in placing and compacting the materials in the Cell.

5.1 Cell Construction As discussed in Section 2. 0, the Cell was constructed in three phases referred to as Pits

1, #2, and #3. As-built drawings of each pit were produced from survey information provided by R.E. Heinz & Associates. For Pit #1, one-foot lift markers were located at 50 foot intervals along the entire length of the east and west excavation walls. The lift markers were utilized to monitor the height of waste placement and to locate the quality control compaction tests performed on the materials placed in the pit. Once the final lift was placed, a four foot cap was placed and compacted in one foot lifts to grade. The other two pits were filled in the same fashion. The as-built drawings for the three pits and the waste placement are shown on Drawings Nos. BA4PIT1-l, BA4PIT1-2, BA4PIT2-1, BA4PIT2-2, BA4PIT3-l, and BA4PIT3-2, which are included in Appendix II.

7

Material placement in Pit #1 began in January 1995 and was completed in February 1995.

The four foot cover was constructed from February to March of 1995. Material placement in Pit #2 began in April 1995 and was completed in September 1996. The four foot cover was constructed in October 1996. Material placement in Pit #3 began in March 1997 and was completed July 2000 with the placement of partial Lift #5. Subsequent sampling, removal of hot spots, additional sampling, and NRC approval occurred in November 2000. From March 2001 to August 2001, Cimarron completed the placement of "clean soil" in Lift #5, Lift #6 and the four foot cap. Finally, a clay barrier was placed adjacent to the Option 2 soils in Pit #3 where the access ramp was located.

5.2 Run-On/Run-Off Control Run-on control was achieved through the use of terraces constructed along the rim of each pit to divert water. One purpose for the terraces was to reduce the amount of rainwater collected in the retention pond which was constructed west of the disposal Cell to collect run-off from the active area of the Cell. The water collected during a rainfall event was sampled for verification that it could be discharged. Analytical data collected during the time the Cell was open indicated that residual contamination was controlled.

Once the access road to Pit #3 was backfilled and closed, the retention pond was surveyed as a part ofSubarea N.

5.3 Waste Transported to Cell Once NRC approval had been received, soils from the four DAP stockpiles were loaded into dump trucks using a trackhoe or a front-end loader and transported to Pit # 1 or Pit

2. The trucks were not loaded to capacity to preclude material spillage during transport to the Cell. For Pit #3, Option 2 materials were excavated, loaded from the field directly into dump trucks, and then transported to the Cell.

At the Cell, the loads were logged in by the unloading supervisor who also designated the unloading location. Once unloaded, the Option 2 soils were spread with a motor grader to level the lift prior to compaction.

The materials placed in the Cell were site soils with lesser amounts of dense construction type rubble, such as asphalt or concrete.

Cimarron employed sound construction practices to ensure the materials were placed to reduce voids and achieve adequate consolidation. The materials were placed and compacted to achieve a one foot layer.

Compaction was verified through a third party utilizing a nuclear density gauge to check soil density after placement.

A water truck was available for dust control and for adding moisture to a lift to achieve the required compaction.

8

5.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Prior to placement of materials into the Cell, Standard Proctor Tests (ASTM D698 35

)

were run on a variety of soil mixtures anticipated to be encountered during the remediation of the site. These tests results are included in Appendix III. These results were used by the technician in selecting the moisture and density required to achieve a compaction of 95% of maximum dry density. The values selected were chosen based on visual observations of the soil to be compacted. The selected moisture and density were then verified through field measurements.

Compaction test locations were randomly selected prior to waste placement. The compaction test results are included as Appendix N. The compaction test data sheets list which Standard Proctor value was used to verify the field compaction.

The field moisture and density were measured utilizing a Troxler Nuclear Density Gauge (Troxler gauge). The Troxler gauge is utilized for field measurements of soil density and moisture and was used at the Cimarron Site for testing compaction on materials placed in the Cell. The Troxler gauge is calibrated annually and checked daily for both density and moisture. The gauge has two nuclear sources which are utilized for determining soil moisture and density. The source for measuring density is Cs-13 7 and the source for measuring moisture is Am-241.

The calibration procedure for density is logarithmic and requires three reference points.

Therefore, three blocks are used. The blocks are constructed from magnesium, magnesium/aluminum and aluminum. The probe is inserted into each block and readings are collected at different probe depths. The counts recorded at the different depths are input into the calibration equations for determining the machine's calibration.

A similar procedure is followed for the moisture calibration. Moisture readings are obtained from measuring the amount of H2 present in the material, as opposed to the amount of water. Calibration for moisture requires the use of two blocks. The moisture calibration is linear. The two blocks utilized are magnesium which represents a zero moisture medium (no H2 present in the material). A magnesium/polyethylene block

( containing H2) represents a moisture content equivalent to a measurement of approximately 35% in average soil.

The Troxler gauge was also checked daily in the field utilizing a polyethylene block. This daily check verifies the equipment was functioning properly. The equipment would not operate without this check.

Standard Testing and Engineering Company of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (Standard Testing) was employed to perform the soil density measurements during placement of Option 2 soil into the Cell. The Standard Testing field technician utilized the Troxler gauge to perform the tests. The test results were used for independent verification that compaction standards were met.

9

6.0 CHARACTERIZATION DATA As discussed in Section 4.0, characterization data was developed by Cimarron for all materials placed into the Cell. The characterization data was submitted to the NRC for review and approval. The submittal dates for the Cimarron characterization data and the corresponding NRC approval dates are summarized in Table 6.1. The NRC performed cell inspections and confirmatory sampling for the majority of the lifts placed into the Cell. Their analytical results are discussed in the approval letters listed in Table 6.1 and referenced in Section 4.0.

Table 6.1 Characterization Data Correspondence Cimarron Submittal NRC Approval

DAP-1 & 2 (Pit #1 & #2) 6/15/94 and 11/15/94 2/16/95

DAP-3 (Pit #2) 4/7/95 5/31/95

DAP-4 (Pit #2) 6/28/96 8/15/96

Lift 1 (Pit #3) 4/18/97 8/7/97

Lift 2 (Pit #3) 10/30/97 4/3/98

Lift 3 (Pit #3) 2/26/98 4/3/98 and 9/10/98

Lift 4 (Pit #3) 2/1/99 5/4/99

Lift 5 (Pit #3) 7/26/00 11/13/00 6.1 Analytical Sampling Results As referenced in Section 4.0, radiological sample results by Cimarron, NRC staff and ORISE show results that indicate the soils placed into the Cell contained low concentrations of enriched uranium which were below the 100 pCi/g approved limits in Amendment #10 of License SNM-928. Also, all individual sample results in excess of 100 pCi/ g were evaluated and shown to satisfy the averaging criteria recommended in NUREG/CR-5849.

The average activity and volume of Option 2 materials placed into each pit of the Cell are listed in Table 6.2.

As shown in this table, the volume is below the 500,000 ft3 authorized by the 1994 Cimarron license amendment and the average activity is below the 100 pCi/g total uranium Option 2 limit for 100% soluble uranium.

Table 6.2 Option 2 On-Site Disposal Cell Volume and Activity Waste Placement Volume (ft3)

Average Activity Average Activity pCi/gU pCi/gTh Pit#l 1/195 -2/95 164,518 45.0 1.0 Pit#2 4/95-9/96 155,950 43.3 1.4 Pit #3 3/97-7/00 131,718 35.7 1.3 Total 452,186 41.7 1.2 10

The total activity estimated to be present in the Cell is.98 curies of total uranium. Per License Condition 23, Cimarron is authorized to bury 500,000 ft:3 of soil contaminated with low-enriched uranium up to 100 pCi/g. At the maximum average concentration and total soil volume, the total activity would equal 2.6 curies of uranium.

Cimarron's disposal volume and activity were below the authorized levels for both.

License Condition 23.b. required the average concentration of thorium and plutonium in the soils placed in the Cell not to exceed 10 pCi/g and 1 pCi/g, respectively. As noted in Table 6.2, the average.thorium concentration was 1.2 pCi/g which is below the guideline value of 10 pCi/g.

Pu analyses also were performed by an off-site laboratory on representative samples collected during site remediation. A total of twenty-three (23) composite samples were collected from soils to be placed into the Cell and analyzed for Pu. The results were all less than 1 pCi/ g.

6.2 Survey Results With the final waste placed into a pit, an exposure rate survey was completed on the surface of the compacted Option 2 material prior to cap placement. For Pit #1, surveys were performed with the µR meter. The exposure rates at the surface as measured using an µR/h meter ranged from 8 to 11 µR/h, with the mean being 9.2 µR/h. For Pit #2, surveys also were performed with the µR meter. The exposure rates at the surface as measured using the µR/h meter ranged from 8 to 11 µR/h, with the mean being 9. I µR/h.

Finally, for Pit #3, surveys were performed at the surface of the Option 2 material with the µR meter. The exposure rates at the surface ranged from 8 to 15 µR/h, with the mean being 11.5 µR/h. Although not applicable, all measured exposure rates were below the surface guideline value of 17 µR/h (i.e., 10 µR/h above the average background of 7

µR/h) or 19 µR/h (i.e., for data collected using the µR meters calibrated off-site).

7.0 CELL CLOSURE After placement and compaction of the final Option 2 materials into each pit, the soils were covered with four feet of "clean" fill. The "clean" fill soils were excavated from areas on-site not effected by prior site operations and analyzed for total uranium to verifying background levels of activity. As discussed in Section 4.0, Pit #3 required "clean" fill to complete Lift #5 and all of Lift #6. The four foot caps placed above each pit were placed in one-foot lifts with each lift compacted and tested prior to the placement of the subsequent lift. The compaction test results are included in Appendix V.

The surface of the final cap was contoured to achieve the minimum slope that provides adequate drainage consistent with conforming to the original shape of the ridge.

The slope of the cap ranges from approximately 1.4% to 2.5%. The final cap contour is shown on Drawing No. BA4-1 (included in Appendix VI). Finally, several inches of top soil were placed over the contoured area and a winter seed mix was broad-cast over the area to establish vegetation.

11

Markers will be placed at the four comers of the Cell and its location recorded on the property deed filed with the County Recorder. The comers of the disposal area will be permanently marked by affixing a brass plate of nominal four to six-inch diameter to a concrete shaft of a similar diameter and a length extending a nominal two feet below the freeze line. The concrete shafts will be poured in place and elevated approximately two feet above the surface of the ground. The brass markers will be engraved with the coordinates of the comers of the disposal area as determined by a registered land surveyor, the words "Radioactive Disposal Area", and a line diagram indicating the relation of the disposal area to the marker.

8.0 FINAL CERTIFICATION License Condition 23. authorized on-site disposal of up to 500,000 cubic feet of soil contaminated with low-enriched uranium up to the BTP Option 2 concentration range.

As shown in Section 6.1, 452,186 ft3 of material were placed into the Cell. The volume was based upon as-built survey data generated by R.E. Heinz & Associates, a registered land surveyor in the State of Oklahoma. The survey data verifies that less than 500,000 ft3 of material were placed into the Cell.

a) License Condition 23.a. specifies that if the average concentration of soil placed into the Cell exceed 100 pCi/g total uranium, then a solubility fraction is to be considered in determining the acceptable guideline value. As shown in Section 6.1, the average concentration for Pit #1 through Pit #3 ranges from 35.7 pCi/g to 45.0 pCi/g.

All three averages are below the 100 pCi/g requiring solubility considerations. Thus, the solubility fraction was not utilized.

b) License Condition 23.b. requires verification that the average concentration for thorium and plutonium shall not exceed 10 pCi/g and 1 pCi/g respectively. As shown in Section 6.1, this condition was met.

c) License Condition 23.c. required a relatively impermeable barrier be placed across the access road to the Cell. As discussed in Section 5.1, a clay barrier was placed adjacent to the Option 2 soils in Pit #3 when the access ramp was located.

The clay dam was greater than three and on-half feet thick.

d) License Condition 23.d. required compaction of both the materials placed into the Cell and the final cap. Additionally, the final contouring was to conform to the original shape of the ridge. Sections 5.1, 5.4 and 7.0 discuss the methods utilized for material placement.

The waste and cap were placed and compacted in nominal one foot lifts; the compaction data are included in Appendix IV and V.

All data were independently verified by Standard Testing and Engineering Company of Oklahoma City.

The cap final contours, which are included on Drawing No. BA4-1 in Appendix VI, were verified by surveys completed by Huddleston Arial Mapping Company.

The survey was performed by Mr. Huddleston, a registered land surveyor in the 12

State of Oklahoma. These contours conform to the original shape of the ridge and promote drainage at slopes from 1.4% to 2.5%. All were less than 6% slope as required by this License Condition, e) License Condition 23.e. requires notifications be placed in the land title declaring that uranium contaminated soil has been buried on site and permanent markers shall be placed at the comers of the disposal Cell. As discussed in Section 7.0, notification will be placed in the land title and permanent markers will be placed at the four comers of the disposal Cell.

f) License Condition 23.f. required the Licensee to maintain procedures, to the extent practical to achieve occupational doses ALARA during Option 2 placement in the Cell.

The Licensee's radiation protection program remained in effect throughout the placement of the Option 2 materials in Pit #1, Pit #2 and Pit #3.

The program has been audited by the NRC numerous times during materials placement and found to be acceptable and to meet ALARA principles.

In conclusion, the Option 2 materials were placed in the Cell in accordance with SNM-928, License Condition 23.

Additionally, the Cell was closed in accordance with this License condition. The remaining tasks to be completed include the establishment of a vegetative cover, installation of cell markers, title declaration, and five years of periodic monitoring for subsidence, erosion, and vegetative cover density.

The site is in the process of fabricating and placing the markers at the four comers of the Cell and adding the required notification in the land title. Winter wheat has been planted to begin the establishment of a vegetative cover. This wheat will be replaced with a more permanent type vegetation next spring as weather permits.

Periodic monitoring of the disposal area has been initiated to check for subsidence, erosion, and vegetation. Any problems noted are to be repaired promptly.

13

APPENDIX I-FINAL STATUS SURVEY PLAN DRAWING

APPENDIX II -AS-BUILT DRAWINGS (INCLUDES WASTE PLACEMENT)

APPENDIX III - STANDARD PROCTOR TESTS

STANDARD*PROCTOR AND SOIL CLASSIFICATION TEST RESULTS TEST METHOD ASTM D698A, D2487

r~~~~-----------3-~-0-N LI_N~CO~L~N~,O~K~~~UIH~OrrM~A~~~~;~,~O-K~7~31~05~(~~~5~)5~2-8~~5~4~1 Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr.

Contractor.

REPORT:

Specification:

2Cl53 File No:

12/21/94 Cl53 9200 KJNG ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND 5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

Cimarron Corporation Project E 411003 S #1 North Field Chase Environmental Cimarron Corporation STANDARD PROCTOR AND A TIERBERG LIMIT TEST RESULTS Area Offices DALLAS, TX 75247 ENID, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK 74134 Date Sampled:

12-2-94 Sampled By:

Client By Order Of: Contractor Order No:

Qyantity See below Reeresented:

. LAB NO: 6718 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Test Method:

ASTM 0698A ASTM 04318 PERCENT MOISTURE DRY DENSITY Lbs./Cu.Ft.

10.0 108.8 12.0 110.0 13.9 109.5 16.3 108.5 12.6 110.2 Maximum Color:

Brown

==

Description:==

Silty Sand Plasticity Index NP Charge:

Cimarron

/..~.:...... ~

Respectft.dly ~mitted~ *- * * ', ;>"~.

Orig. & 1 cc Chase Environmental 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron STANDARCY.rESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

a ----.... _:_ '\\

':.w&

Robert E. W.fliddon, P.E:

~~-~.

'\\.,.

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLEIS) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENnY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES. NOA 00 THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS so NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE use Of THE ADDRESSED CLIENT AND ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WAIITEN PERMISSION.

110.5 110 f 109.5 C:

Q)

Cl

~

Cl 109

108.5 10 11 Cimarron--North Field Brown Silty Sand Maximum Dry Density=110.2 PCF Optimum Moisture= 12.6%

12 13 14 15 Percent Moisture Atterberg Limits-Non-Plastic 16 17

,~;~~-----------3~-0-N-.L-IN~C~O~L~Nm,O~KTIU~H~O.~M~A~.c~~m~n.~O~K~7~31EOn5n(~~5ITT)~52~8rr~m54~1 Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

9200 KING ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND 5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

2Cl53 File No:

Cl53 12/21/94 Cimarron Corporation Project E 411003 S #2 South -U-Yard Chase Environmental Cimarron Corporation STANDARD PROCTOR AND ATIERBERG LIMIT TEST RESULTS Area Offices DALLAS, TX 75247 ENID, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK74134 Date Sampled: 12-2-94 Sampled By:

Client By Order Of: Contractor Order No:

Quantity See below Represented:

LAB NO: 6719 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Test Method:

ASTM D698A ASTM D4318 PERCENT MOISTURE DRY DENSITY Lbs./Cu.Ft.

10.2 111.6 12.2 115.6 14.4 114.5 16.2 111.8 12.6 Optimum 115.7 Maximum Color:

Brown

==

Description:==

Clavev Siltv Sand Liouid Limit 25 Plastic Limit 18 Plasticity Index 7

Charge:

Cimarron Respectfully submitted,..

STAND,~b.TESTING ANEl.. ENGINEERING CO.

Orig. & 1 cc Chase Environmental 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Robert E. Whidd~n, P.E.

\\ ; '...

\\~::

... ~-.,,, ~**

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE Of THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES. NOR 00 TiiEY REPRESENT AN OH GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE use OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT AND ARE NOT TO BE REPROOUCEO WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

116 115 u..

~ 114 112 111 10 11 Cimarron--South U-Yard Brown Clayey Silty Sand Maximum Dry Oensity-115.7 PCF Optimum moisture-12.6°/o 12 13 14 15 Percent Moisture Atterberg Limits-LL=25, Pl=7 (CL-ML) 16 17

1r.::=~----------------c=-o=R=p=-o=RA=T=e=-o=FF=1=c=e-a_n....,..d-::C=e=N=T=RA7"L::--r--:;;-:.;:-o=RA"='T=o=-R=v--

l ANO eNOINH,.tNa c:o~~ANY 3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (405) 528...0541 Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

2Cl53 File No:

12/21/94 Cl53 9200 KJNG ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND 5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

Cimarron Corporation Project E 411003 8#3 NIA Chase Environmental Cimarron Corporation STANDARD PROCTOR AND ATIERBERG LIMIT TEST RESULTS Area offices DALLAS, TX 75247 ENID. OK 73703 LAWTON, OK73501 TULSA, OK 74134 Date Sampled: 12-2-94 Sampled By:

Client By Order Of: Contractor Order No:

Quantity See below Reeresented:

LAB NO: 6720 (214) 631-4372

( 405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Test Method:

ASTM D698A ASTM 04318 PERCENT MOISTURE DRY DENSITY Lbs./Cu.Ft.

10.2 109.8 12.1 111.7 13.9 113.0 16.0 108.3 13.9 Optimum 113.0 Maximum Color:

Brown

==

Description:==

Siltv Clavev Sand Plasticity Index NP

. ~

Charge:

Cimarron RespectfuJly*submitted, Orig. & 1 cc Chase Environmental 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron STANDA_RD TE.STING AND ENGINEERING CO.

j l *......... *--~

~

Robert~

TiilS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPI.E(S) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES. NOR 00 THEY REPRESENT AH ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS so NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE use OF THE AOORESSED CLIENT AHO ARE NOT TO IJE RE PROOUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

Cimarron--NIA Brown Silty Clayey Sand 114-.------------------,

113 u::112

(.)

a. -

~

~ 111 C:

(1) 0

~ 110 Cl 109 108 10 Maximum Dry Density=113.0 PCF Optimum Moisture Content=13.9%

11 12 13 14 Percent. Moisture Atterberg Limits-Non-Plastic 15 16

,F11~,-----------3-40_0_N ___

L(_IN~COIRLl'iNrn, ~OKrTLA'F"1"'1HiJ:.'10i:1iMr!lA:"";Ca;;;l~iif.1"!0J:1KQ"17~312[]0n5 n(40~5rr,) ~52x,8-0rr5rc,4iV"',1 Area Offices DALLAS, TX 75247 ENID, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK73501 TULSA, OK 74134 Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

2Cl53 File No:

Cl53 12/21/94 9200 KING ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND 5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

Cimarron Corporation Project E 411003 S 1#4 DP East Chase Environmental Cimarron Corporation STANDARD PROCTOR AND ATIERBERG LIMIT TEST RESULTS Date Sampled:

12-2-94 Sampled By:

Client By Order Of: Contractor Order No:

Quantity See below Represented:

(214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (916) 459-2700 LAB NO: 6721 Test Method:

ASTM 0698A ASTM 04318 PERCENT MOISTURE DRY DENSITY Lbs./Cu.Ft.

10.0 116.3 11.9 118.2 14.4 116.4 16.2 113.3 12.1 Optimum 118.2 Maximum Color:

Red

==

Description:==

Clayey Silty Sand Plasticity Index NP Charge:

Cimarron Respectfully submitted,* * **

Orig. & 1 cc Chase Environmental STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron nos REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES. NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALllY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO

~Rf NOT ro Clf Rff'ROOUCfO WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

119 118 ts 117 0..

~

~ 116 C

(1)

~ 115 C

114 113 10 11 Cimarron--DA East Red Clayey Silty Sand

-- Maximum Dry Density-118.2 PCF Optimum moisture = 12.1 %

12 13 14 15 Percent Moisture Atterberg Limits-Non-Plastic 16 17

,~;~~-----------3-~-0-N-.-L11N~C~03L~N,~O~Kfl~~H~O.~M~A~~~m~d,~O~K~7~3~10r5T~~5)~5~28~~~5~41~

Area omces DALLAS, TX 75247 ENID, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK 74134 Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor.

REPORT:

Specification:

2Cl53 File No:

Cl53 12/21/94 9200 KJNG ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND 5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

Cimarron Corporation Project E 411003 S#S DP West Chase Environmental Cimarron Corporation STANDARD PROCTOR AND ATIERBERG LIMIT TEST RESULTS Date Sampled: 12-2-94 Sampled By:

Client By Order Of: Contractor Order No:

Quantity See below Represented:

LAB NO: 6722 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Test Method:

ASTM D698A ASTM 04318 PERCENT MOISTURE DRY DENSITY Lbs./Cu.Ft.

10.4 114.3 12.3 117.2 14.1 115.8 16.8 110.6 12.2 Optimum 117.2 Maximum Color:

Red

==

Description:==

Silty Clayey Sand Liquid Limit 26 Plastic Limit 14 Plasticity Index 12 Charge:

Cimarron Respectfully submitted, Orig. & 1 cc Chase Environmental STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Robe~ E. Whiddon, P.E.

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPlE(S} TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS, OR PROCEDURES. NOR 00 THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSUAANC£ PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO SE REPROOUCEO WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

~

u..

118 117 116

~ 115

~ 114 C

Q) 0 113

~

Cl 112 111 110 10 11 Cimarron--DA West Red Silty Clayey Sand Maximum Ory Oensity=117.2 PCF Optimum Moisture = 12.2%

12 13 14 15 16 Percent Moisture

. Atterberg Limits-LL=26, Pl=12 (CL) 17

/ ~II~~

340-0_N_.

L1 1N~C-n::Or,::sLNni, ~OrrKLA~H1=10M:-uA~c;j~iru;fl, ~o~K T173n1orr=-s-r:(40;[15R:)m52iE8rc..Om54iV'1 Area Offices DALLAS, TX 75247 ENID, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK74134 Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

- Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

ASTM 9200 KING ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND 5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

2Cl53 File No:

Cl53 1/10/95 Cimmarron Corporation Project S#6, 1/3 North Field, 1/3 East of U-Yard, 1/3 West of U-Yard Chase Environmental Cimmarron Corporation STANDARD PROCTOR AND SOIL CLASSIFICATION TEST RESULTS Date Sampled:

12-29-94 Sampled By: Client By Order Of: Contractor Order No:

Quantity See below Represented:

LAB NO: 6944 (214} 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Test Method: ASTM D698A, D2487 PERCENT MOISTURE DRY DENSITY Lbs./Cu.Ft.

10.0 11.8 13.7 15.4 13.4 Color:

Unified Classification:

% Passing #1 O Sieve

% Passing #40 Sieve

% Passing #200 Sieve Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index Charge:

Cimmarron Orig. & 1 cc Chase Environmental 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimmarron 0 timum Red CL-ML 99.5 98.0 56.5 24 17 7

112.0 114.9 116.4 113.2 116.6 Descri tion:

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES, NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSUAANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE AOORESSEO CLIENT AND ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRIITEN PERMISSION.

117 116 L2 115 t)

Cl. -

~ 114 C:

Q)

C

~ 113 C

Cimarron--N. Field, EU-Yd, WU-Yd Red Sandy Clay Max. Dry Density-116.6 PCF Optimum moisture=13.4%

11 2 * ---/ ------------------------------------------------------

111 10 11 12 13 14 Percent Moisture Atterberg Limits-LL=24, Pl=7 (CL-ML) 15 16 I

. i i

,r.&'fA~------------------:C::-:O:::-=R=p=-=o:-:RA:-::-=T=-e-=o-=F=F1,-,::c-=e-a-nd--=---=c-=e=-=:NT=RA~L-:LA~B:-:::O:-:RA=-=-=To=,RY:-:---,..

j ANO ENGINEERING COMPANY 3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

ASTM 2Cl53 File No:

Cl53 1/10/95 9200 KING ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND 5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

Cimmarron Corporation Project S#7, 1 /3 North Field, 2/3 Lagoon Chase Environmental Cimmarron Corporation STANDARD PROCTOR AND SOIL CLASSIFICATION TEST RESULTS Area Offices DALLAS, TX 75247 ENID, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK 7 4134 Date Sampled:

12-29-94 Sampled By:

Client By Order Of: Contractor Order No:

Q_uantity See below Represented:

LAB NO: 6945 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130

( 405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Test Method: ASTM D698A, 02487 PERCENT MOISTURE DRY DENSITY Lbs./Cu.Ft.

11.2 13.0 14.9 16.7 14.2 Color:

Unified Classification:

%. Passing #1 a Sieve

% Passing #40 Sieve

% Passing #200 Sieve Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index Charge:

Cimmarron Orig. & 1 cc Chase Environmental 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimmarron 0 tirnurn Red CL 98.2 89.0 62.9 28 15 13 113.7 117.4 118.1 113.7 118.8 Descri tion:

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLYCID1 EENTNTIANCA0L OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES. NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE Of THE ADDRESSED L ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRlillN PERMISSION.

119 118

-117 u_

()

~ 116

~

en ffi 115 Cl

~

0 114 113 112 11 Cimarron--(N. Field, Lagoon)

Red Sandy Clay Max dry density-118.8 PCF Optimum moisture=14.2%

12 13 14 15 Percent Moisture Atterberg Limits-LL=28, Pl=13 (CL) 16

17.

APPENDIX IV - WASTE COMPACTION TEST RESULTS

BURIAL PIT #1 FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS

. TEST METHODS ASTM D2922B,* ASTM 1556-90

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 1/11/95 Cimarron Corp., Cresent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

FIELD DENSITY OF 1st LIFT CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABa=IATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 902 Trails West Loop 660 Distributors Row, Suite C 900 S.E. 2nd Branch Offices Dallas. TX 75356 Enid, OK 73703 Harahan, LA 70123 Lawton, OK 73501 Date Sampled:

1-10-95 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (504) 734-8378

( 405) 353-0872 By Order Of:

K. Crawford Order No:

CEG E411003 Quantity Red Silty Clayey Represented: Sand LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 TEST RESULTS Laboratory No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Dry Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Density ReQuired Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech 7008 7009 7010 7011 561m East; 569m East; 569m East; 575m East; 411m North 347m North 322m North 303m North 11.1 13.0 12.8 14.7 125.4 131.8 130.7 131.2 112.9 116.7 115.8 114.4 117.2 117.2 117.2 117.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 6722 6722 6722 6722 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 96.3 99.5 98.8 97.6 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR "TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPlf(S) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAi.

OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS, OR PROCEDURES, NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT AND ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIAC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 1/11/95 Cimarron Corp., Cresent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

FIELD DENSITY OF 1st LIFT CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABOOATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 902 Trails West Loop 660 Distributors Row, Suite C 900 S.E. 2nd Branch Offices Dallas, TX 75356 Enid, OK 73703 Harahan, LA 70123 Lawton, OK 73501 Date Sampled:

1-10-95 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (504) 734-8378 (405) 353-0872 By Order Of:

K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity Red Silty Clayey Represented:

Sand LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM 01556-90 TEST RESULTS Laboratory No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Dry Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Density Required Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech 7012 7013 7014 7015 561m East; 569m East; 569m East; 575m East; 411m North 347m North 322m North 303m North 14.5 14.1 14.8 14.7 128.6 130.9 130.8 129.7 112.3 114.7 113.9 113.1 117.2 117.2 117.2 117.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 6722 6722 6722 6722 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 95.8 97.9 97.2 96.5 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Respectfully submitted, STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

"TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLElS) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILV INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES oi: APPARENT\\.Y IOENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS, OR PROCEDURES, NOR 00 THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRlmN PERMISSION.

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 1/19/95 Cimarron Corp., Cresent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. {Chase Environmental)

FIELD DENSITY OF 2nd LIFT CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABffiATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 002 Tr~ West Loop 900 S.E. 2nd 5806 S. 129th East Ave.

Branch Offices Dallas, TX 75247 Enid. OK 73703 Lawton, OK 73501 Tulsa. OK 74134 (214) 631 ""4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 45S.2700 Date Sampled:

1-17-95 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor By Order Of:

K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity See below Represented:

LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 TEST RESULTS 6718 - Brown Silty Sand 6944 - Red Sandy Clay 6945 - Red Sandy Clay Laboratory No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Ory Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Density Required Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1 cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech 7151 7152 7153 7154 569m East; 564m East; 571m East; 577m East; 410m North 370m North 349m North 328m North 13.6 9.4 11.1 10.2 121.6 143.8 129.7 125.4 107.0 131.4 116.7 113.8 110.2 118.8 118.8 116.8 12.6 14.2 14.2 13.4 6718 6945 6945 6944 12-2-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 97.1 110.6 98.3 97.6 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR "TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLEAS) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INOICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APP'-PJ:NTLV IOENTICAL

~~e5~~~~s ~~i~~~bEuiii~~j¥~g~1~ei~riiiri1~~Ve~~l~iTtN~ ON GOING QUALITY ASSU ANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 1/19/95 Cimarron Corp., Cresent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

FIELD DENSITY OF 2nd LIFT CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABffiATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 902 Trails West Loop 660 Distributors Row, Suite C 900 S.E. 2nd Branch Offices Dallas, TX 75356 Enid, OK 73703 Harahan, LA 70123 Lawton, OK 73501

{214) 631-4372

{405) 237-3130 (504) 734-8378 (405) 353-0872 Date Sampled:

1-17-95 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor By Order Of:

K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity See below Represented:

LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM 01556-90 TEST RESULTS 6718 - Brown Silty Sand 6944 - Red Sandy Clay 6945 - Red Sandy Clay Laboratory No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Orv Density Lbs.ICU. Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Density Required Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech 7155 7156 7157 7158 569m East; 564m East:

571m East; 577m East; 410m North 370m North 349m North 328m North 11.5 10.5 12.1 10.0 119.7 145.5 129.4 128.2 107.4 131.7 115.5 116.6 110.2 118.8 118.8 116.8 12.6 14.2 14.2 13.4 6718 6945 6945 6944 12-2-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 97.5 110.9 97.2 99.8 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Respectfully submitted, STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

"TEST FOR ASSURANCE"

'[JilSS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE{S) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE Of THE QUALmes OF '-PPARENTLY IOEHTICAL R !MILAR PRODUCTS, OR PROCEDURES, NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE AODRE"""D CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRlrrEN PERMISSION.

~

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 1/24/95 Cimarron Corp., Cresent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

FIELD DENSITY OF 3rd LIFT CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABCAATOAY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 902 Trails West loop 900S.E 2nd 5806 S. 129th East Ave.

Branch Offices Dallas, TX 75247 Enid, OK 73703 Lawton, OK 73501 Tulsa, OK 74134 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-31~

(405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Date Sampled: 1-20-95 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor By Order Of: K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity Red Sandy Clay Represented:

LAB NO: See Below Test Method: ASTM D29228 TEST RESULTS Laboratory No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu. Ft Dry Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Density Required Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1 cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech 7168 7169 7170 7171 401m East; 397m East; 338m East; 298m East; 571m North 567m North 578m North 577m North 12.3 13.4 12.1 13.1 127.3 130.7 127.6 131.2 113.2 115.3 113.8 115.9 118.8 118.8 118.8 118.8 14.2 14.2 14.2 14.2 6945 6945 6945 6945 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 95.3 97.0 95.8 97.6 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR "TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE/8! TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INOICATIVE Of THE QUi\\LITIES Of Al'l'AP.Etm.'f IOEtlTICM.

~:es~i~~s :ri~~~6iui~b~~w~g~~\\SPEi9~ii~~Nemfe~~1iiTa\\~ ON GOING QUALITY ASSU NCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO

--.,,~.... **--\\'.

.;.: ts:****-=i:.~........

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr.

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification: -

-ECH 15 File No:

1395-1353 2/2/95 Cimarron Corp., Crescent, OK Burial Ground #4.

Cimarron Corporation

Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

FIELD DENSITY OF 4th LIFT

~.,. *,.** ~.* J1,

~

~. CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABCAATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Ar1htK DriY8 902 Trais West Loop 900 S.E. 2nd 5806 S 1291h East Ne.

Branch Offices Dallas, TX 75247 Enid, OK 73703 Lawton. OK 73501 Tcasa, OK 74134 Date Sampled: 2/2/95 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor By Order Of:

K Crawford (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (4051353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity Brown Clayey Silty Represented: Sand LAB NO: See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 TEST RESULTS Laboratory No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Dry Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Density ReQuired Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech 7223 7224 7225 7226 405m North; 365m North; 375m North; 330m North; 575m East 570m East 560m East 570m East 11.2 12.7 12.1 12.0 128.1 127.7 122.6.

127.4 113.4 113.3 109.4 113.7 113.0 113.0 113.0 113.0 13.9 13.9 13.9 13.9 6720 6720 6720 6720 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 100.4.

100.3 96.8 100.7 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR "TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE(Sl TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSAR OR SIMILAR PROOIIC:TS OR PROr.FnllRFS NOR on THFY RFPRFSFNT-AN ON {,OINA OIIAI ITV AC:C:IIA.U11'i: PAnf:Q.&U 11111 i:cc en.. nTt:n Turc,r DrDMTr.!!-r !~21~~!1~.2F.!!!t0.~~!1I~E§.~.~!~~~..L'i:.l~E~~

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor.

REPORT:

Specification:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 2/9/95 Cimarron Corp., Crescent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

FIELD DENSITY OF 5th LIFT CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LAB~ATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla City, OK 73105 (405) 528*0541 9200 King Arthur Orille

~

Trails West Loop 000 S.E. 2nd 5806 s. 1291h East Ave.

Branch Offices Callas. TX 75247 Enid. OK 73703 Lawton. OK 73501 Tulsa. OK 74134 Date Sampled: 2/6/95 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor By Order Of:

K. Crawford (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-31~

(405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity Brown Clayey Silty Represented: Sand LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 TEST RESULTS Laboratory No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Orv Densitv Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Densitv Reouired Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1 cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech 7255 7256 7257 7258 565m East; 565m East; 565m East; 560m East; 285m North 310m North 390m North 400m North 9.8 14.5 12.9 12.2 126.9 125.9 128.7 124.0 115.5 110.0 114.0 110.5 115.7 115.7 115.7 115.7 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 6719 6719 6719 6719 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 99.8 95.1 98.5 95.5 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR

.. TEST FOR.-\\SSURANCE"'

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLEiSI TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE Of THE OUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES. NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS so NOTED THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE use OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO 6f Rf PROOUCfO WITHOUT Sf'ECIFIC WRITTEN l'fftMISSION.

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 2/13/95 Cimarron Corp., Crescent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. (Chase Enviror)mental)

FIELD DENSITY OF 6th LIFT CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABCAATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 902 Trails West Loop 900 S.E. 2nd 5806 S. 129th East Ave.

Branch Offices Dallas, TX 75247 Enid, OK 73703 Lawton, OK 73501 Tulsa, OK 74134 Date Sampled: 2/9/95 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872

{918) 459-2700 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor By Order Of:

K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity Brown Clayey Silty Represented:

Sand LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 TEST RESULTS Corrected Report 3/27/95 Laboratory No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Dry Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Density ReQuired Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1 cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech 7322 7323 7324 7325 570m East; 575m East; 575m East; 570m East; 390m North 365m North 355m North 370m North 11.8 12.0 12.1 11.6 135.1 127.4 129.0 128.1 120.8 113.7 115.1 114.8 115.7 115.7 115.7 115.7 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 6719 6719 6719 6719 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 104.4 98.3 99.5 99.2 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR "TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OFTHE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS, OR PROCEDURES. NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS so NOTED THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE use OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT AND ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

BURIALPIT#2

. FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS TEST METHODS ASTM D2922B,*ASTM 1556-90

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 5/1/95 Cimarron Corp., Crescent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cell #2 Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABOOATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 902 Trails West Loop 900 S.E. 2nd 5806 S. 129th East Ave.

Branch Offices DaNas, TX 75247 Enid, OK 73703 Lawton, OK 73501 Tulsa, OK 74134 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Date Sampled: 4/27/95 Sampled By: S. Batchelor By Order Of: K. Crawford Order No:

CEG E411003 Quantity See below Represented:

REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF 1st Lift (<12" Thick)

LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM D2922B Specification:

6722 - Red Silty Clayey Sand 6944 - Red Sandy Clay Laboratory No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Dry Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor o/o of Std. Proctor Density Required Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1 cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech TEST RESULTS 8233 8234 8235 8236 286m North; 298m North; 379m North; 413m North; 549m East 554m East 537m East 538m East 9.5 10.9 13.3 11.5 126.3 129.8 125.9 129.4 115.3 117.0 111.1 116.1 117.2 117.2 116.6 117.2 12.2 12.2 13.4 12.2 6722 6722 6944 6722 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-29-94 12-2-94 98.4 99.8 95.3 99.1 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR "TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL ORRESNIM01LAR PRODUCTS, OR PROCEDURES, NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADORESSEO CLIENT ANO A

T TO BE REPRODUCED WrTHOUT SPECIFIC WRlffiN PERMISSION.

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

ECH 15 File No:

1395-1353 6/16/95 Cimarron Corp., Crescent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cell #2 Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental}

CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABffiATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Ar1hur Drive 9:l2 Trails West Loop 9:lO S.E. 2nd 5806 S. 129th East Ave.

Branch Offices Dallas. TX 75247 Enid. OK 73703 Lawton, OK 73501 Tulsa OK 74134 Date Sampled: 6/15/95 Sampled By: T. Sills (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 14051 353-0872 1918) 459-2700 By Order Of:

K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity Red Sandy Clay Represented:

REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF 2nd Lift (<12" Thick)

LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM D2922B

. Specification:

Laboratorv No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Drv Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Standard Proctor Densitv Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Densitv ReQuired Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1 cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech TEST RESULTS 8888 8889 8890 8891 420m North; 415m North; 300m North; 285ni North; 540m East 535m East 550m East 540m East

10.0 11.5 9.7 12.9 127.0 124.1 125.7 132.2 115.4 111.3 114.6 117.1 116.6 116.6 116.6 116.6 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4 6944 6944 6944 6944 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 99.0 95.5 98.3 100.4 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR

.. TEST FOR ASSURANCE"

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor.

ECH 15 File No:

1395-1353 6/22/95 Cimarron Corp., Crescent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cell #2 Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABffiATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 902 Trails West Loop 900 S.E. 2nd 5806 S. 129th East Ave.

Branch Offices Dallas, TX 75247 Enid. OK 73703 Lawton. OK 73501 Tulsa, OK 74134 Date Sampled: 6/20/95 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor By Order Of: K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity Brown Silty Sand Represented:

REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF 3rd Lift ( <12" Thick)

LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 Specification:

Laboratorv No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Orv Density Lbs.ICU. Ft Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Density Required Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1 cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech TEST RESULTS 8949 8950 8951 8952 370m North; 350m North; 325m North; 295m North; 550m East 550m East 552m East 545m East 8.5 10.2 10.2 10.3 113.5 115.8 120.0 121.8 104.7 105.1 108.8 110.4 110.2 110.2 110.2 110.2 12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 6718 6718 6718 6718 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-29-94 12-2-94 95.0 95.4 98.7 100.2 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR "TEST FOR..\\SSURANCE"

1~,~~=i~~~~isoi1ir J~:c~b~1io~~s OR PFIOCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE!SI iESTEO ANO/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC~:J1:i~:,~tN~ ON GOING OUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNUSS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE Of THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO

CORPORATE OFFICE and CENTRAL LABORATORY 3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 KING ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND 5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

Area Offices DALLAS, TX 75247 ENID, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK 7 4134 (214) 631-:4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Acct. No:

2CH98 File No:

CH98 Report Date:

9/11/96 Date Sampled:

09/04/96 Project:

Controlled Fill Project Cimarron Corp, Cresent, Sampled By: J. Taylor OK Location:

Burial Ground #DAC-2 Cell #2 By Order Of:

Joe Kegin Arch./Engr:

Order No:

Contractor:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Quantity Red Clayey Silty Represented:

Sand REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF 4TH LIFT (12" THICK)

LAB NO:

See Below Specification:

Test Method: ASTM D29228 TEST RESULTS Laboratory No.

S-4210 S-4211 S-4212 S-4213 Location

547 E 540 E 550 E 542 E 400 N 357 N 334 N 313 N 4th Lift 4th Lift 4th Lift 4th Lift Percent Moisture 10.3 14.5 9.5 9.3 Wet Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

131.1 130.1 128.0 134.3 Dry Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

118.9 113.6 116.9 122.9 Standard Proctor Density 118.2 118.2 118.2 118.2 Optimum Moisture 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 Proctor Densitv No.

6721 6721 6721 6721 Date of Proctor 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 100.6 96.1 98.9 104.0 Required 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Charge:

Chase Envlronmentai Group, Corp.

Respectfully submitted, Orig. & 1-cc same STANDARD TESTING A ENGINEERING CO.

1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS, OR PROCEDURES. NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS AFiE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT AND ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITIEN PERMISSION.

J1J (r

.Qi ~

r;;i:; l'?)'";.:.:,1*

CORPORATE OFFICE and CENTRAL LABORATORY

c......,::J, \\."l r./::1 /0 3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 0,.

j

~ **

I/

Area Offices i... t J. I jl!_Q~

OKING ARTHUR DRIVE DALLAS, TX 75247 (214) 631-4372 2 TRAILS WEST LOOP ENID, OK 73703 (405) 237-3130 900 S.E. SECOND LAWTON, OK 73501 (405) 353-0872

................... ___.5aQ6 S. 129 EAST AVE.

TULSA, OK 74134 (918) 459-2700 Acct. No:

2CH98 File No:

CH98 Report Date:

9/13/96 Project:

Controlled Fill Project Cimarron Corp, Cresent, OK Location:

Burial Ground #DCA-2 Cell #2 Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF 5TH LIFT (12" THICK)

Specification:

6718/Brown Silty Sand

6721 /Red Clayey Silty Sand Laboratorv No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Orv Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

S-4342 418 N 546 E 5th Lift

'13.0 122.7 108.6 110.2 12.6 6718 TEST RESULTS S-4343 S-4344 403 N 353 N 549E 549 E 5th Lift 5th Lift 11.7 7.7 122.7 130.2 109.8 120.9 110.2 118.2 12.6 12.1 6718 6721 Date Sampled: 09/10/96 Sampled By: J. Taylor By Order Of:

Joe Kegin Order No:

Quantity See. Below*

Represented:

LAB NO: See Below Test Method: ASTM D29228 S-4345 288 N 543 E 5th Lift 10.0 131.3 119.4 118.2 12.1 6721 Date of Proctor 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 98.5 99.6 102.3 101.0 Reauired 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Charge:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Orig. & 1-cc same 1-cc t-aboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE($) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS, OR PROCEDURES, NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS AfiE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT AND ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

rr-.._, _____

---coRFtORATcl~fnltCENl~mRATOI~

r AND ENGINEERING COMPANY Jrn@rn~. wrnj 3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHOMA c,TY, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 I

D Ca77 Exp. 06/30/99 MAY 1 l 'l~~ij 9200 KING ARTHUR DRIVE Area i~~~s. TX 75247 (214) 631-4372 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP ENID, OK 73703 (405) 237-3130 900 S.E. SECOND LAWTON, OK 73501 (405) 353-0872

-*-*********************.. 5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

TULSA, OK 74134 (918) 459-2700 Acct. No:

2CH98 File No:

CH98 Report Date:

5/5/98 Project:

Location:

Controlled Fill Project Cimarron Corp, Cresent, OK Burial Ground #DAC-2 Cell #2 Date Sampled:

09/13/96 Sampled By:

Jim Riggs By Order Of: Joe Kegin Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Order No: CEG #411003 Quantity Red Silty Clayey Represented:

Sand REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF 6TH* LIFT (<12" THICK)

LAB NO: See Below Test Method: ASTM D29228 03017 Specification:

TEST RESULTS

Corrected Report Dated 05/05/98 Laboratory No.

S-4426 S-4427 S-4428 S-4429 Location 382 N 335 N 313 N 348 N 545 E 550 E 549 E 540 E Lift 6 Lift 6 Lift 6 Lift 6 Percent Moisture 10.4 10.1 11.0 11.0 Wet Density, pcf 126.5 130.4 125.2 125.3 Orv Density, ocf 114.6 118.4 112.8 112.9 Standard Proctor Density, pcf 117.2 117.2 117.2 117.2 Ootimum Moisture, %

12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 Proctor Densitv No.

6722 6722 6722 6722 Date of Proctor 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 97.8 101.0 96.2 96.3 Reouired 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Charge:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Orig. & 1-cc same 1-cc Laboratory 1~cc Cimarron Corp.

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE($) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS, OR PROCEDURES, NOR 00 THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS AF1t: FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE AOORESSEO CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRIITEN PERMISSION.

. BURIAL.*PIT#3.*

FIELD DENSITY TEST ~SULTS

.TEST METHODASTM D2922B

r ****-*

~.-.--.~.... an 3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 KING ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND 5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

Area Offices DALLAS, TX 75247 ENID, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK 7 4134 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Acct. No:

2CH98 File No:

CH98 Report Date:

3/24/97 Project:

Controlled Fill Project Cimarron Corp, Cresent, OK Date Sampled:

03/24/97 Sampled By:

Jim Riggs Location:

Arc~./Engr:

Contractor:

Pit#3 Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

By Order Of: Joe Kegin Order No:

Quantity Red Silty Clayey Represented:

Sand REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF Lift 1 (12" Thick)

LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 Specification:

TEST RESULTS Laboratory No.

S-7074 S-7075 S-7076 S-7077 S-7078 Location 415 N &

425N &

365 N &

310 N &

300N&

511 E 521 E 510 E 514 E 513 E 1st Lift 1st Lift 1st Lift 1st Lift 1st Lift Percent Moisture 8.3 6.8 10.1 6.4 8.2 Wet Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

120.9 119.1 123.6 118.8 120.4 Dry Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

111.6 111.5 112.3 111.7 111.3 Standard Proctor Density 117.2 117.2 117.2 117.2 117.2 Optimum Moisture 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 Proctor Density No.

6722 6722

6722 6722 6722 Date of Proctor 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 95.2 95.1 95.8 95.3 95.0 Required 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Charge:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Respectfully submitted, Orig. & 1-cc same STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Ci~arron Corp.

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE($) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE Of THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS, OR PROCEDURES. NOR 00 THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS AF1E FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WAlnEN PERMISSION.

CORPORATE OFFICE and CENTRAL LABORATORY

~~,

3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 I~

rrJ mi~ ~

Ca77 Exp. 06/30/99

~

Area Offices Sep 1; 1997 0 KING ARTHUR DRIVE DALLAS, TX 75247 (214) 631-4372 L

02 TRAILS WEST LOOP ENID, OK 73703 (405) 237-3130 900 S.E. SECOND LAWTON, OK 73501 (405) 353-0872

".............................58Q6S. 129 EAST AVE.

TULSA, OK 74134 (918) 459-2700 Acct. No:

2CH98 File No:

CH98 Report Date:

9/9/97 Date Sampled:

09/05/97 Project:

Controlled Fill Project Cimarron Corp, Cresent, Sampled By:

Jim Riggs OK Location:

Burial Ground #4 Cell #3 By Order Of: Joe Kegin Arch./Engr:

Order No:

Contractor:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Quantity Red Clayey Silty Represented:

Sand REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF LIFT #2 (12" THICK)

LAB NO:

See Below Specification:

Test Method: ASTM D2922B TEST RESULTS Laboratory No.

S-12038 S-12039 S-12040 S-12041 S-12042 Location 401 N 382 N 328 N 322 N 300 N 512 E 520 E 515 E 528 E 312 E Lift 2 Lift 2 Lift 2 Lift 2 Lift 2 Percent Moisture 7.4 7.9 10.8 9.0 10.5 Wet Densitv Lbs./Cu. Ft.

122.3 121.3 127.4 128.6 128.2 Orv Densitv Lbs./Cu.Ft.

113.9 112.4 115.0 118.0 116.0 Standard Proctor Density 118.2 118.2 118.2 118.2 11,8.2 Ootimum Moisture 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 Proctor Density No.

6721 6721 6721 6721 6721 Date of Proctor 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 96.4 95.1 97.3 99.8 98.1 Reauired 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Charge:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Orig. & 1-cc same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES. NOR 00 THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS Af1t FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT AND ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

l~-~--------j~

1-T-~

,-~-

---~-

.. -.'l 1

1N~c~o~LN°,~o~K~~~H~O~M~A~cm,rr~,0oaKn7R31M05~(~4o~s0)s~2~s~~M~1~

I Ca77 Exp. 06/30/99 t *. 1

Area Offices 92 l~C3 AFfrMU8 ORM~;. ! DALLAS, TX 75247 (214) 631-4372 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP

.. ENID, OK 73703 (405) 237-3130 90~Ji.. SECOND LAWTON, OK 73501 (405) 353-0872 5806 S. 1~~l:~S1'~V~.......... __ ~..

TULSA, OK 74134 (918) 459-2700 Acct. No:

2CH98 File No:

CH98 Report Date:

2/26/98 Project:

Controlled Fill Project Cimarron Corp, Cresent, OK Date Sampled:

02/16/98 Sampled By:

S. Humphrey Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

Disposal Cell #3, Lift 3 Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

By Order Of:

Joe Kegin Order No:

Quantity Red Clayey Silty Represented:

Sand REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF SUBGRADE FILL LAB NO: See Below Test Method: ASTM D29228 03017 Specification:

TEST RESULTS Laboratory No.

S-15977 S-15978 S-15979 S-15980 S-15981 Location 415 N 395 N 365 N 345 N 315 N 522E 252 E 510 E 515 E 512 E Percent Moisture 12.1 12.8 13.3 11.8 10.6 Wet Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

127.2 126.8 127.5 128.8 124.8 Dry Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

113.5 112.4 112.5 115.2 112.8 Standard Proctor Density 118.2 118.2 118.2 118.2 118.2 Optimum Moisture 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 Proctor Density No.

6721 6721 6721 6721 6721 Date of Proctor 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 96.0 95.1 95.2 97.5 95.4 Required 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Charge:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Respectfully submitted, Orig. & 1-cc same STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

l -l '?-C, J-THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES. NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS AFlt: FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

0220CHA20 11/8/99 File No:

CHA20 Controlled Fill Project Cimarron Corp.,

Crescent, OK Burial Ground #4, Cell #3 Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF LIFT #4 (12" THICK)*

Specification:

TEST RESULTS

REVISED REPORT ISSUED 11/8/99 Test No.

1 2

Location 400'North 355'North and 525' and 528' East of East of Edge Edge Percent Moisture 5.1 5.1 Wet Density, pcf 114.3 114.1 Dry Density, pcf 108.8 108.6 Standard Proctor Density, pcf 110.2 110.2 Optimum Moisture, %

12.6 12.6 Proctor Density No.

S-6718 S-6718 Date of Proctor 12/2/94 12/2/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 98.7 98.5 Required 95+

95+

Date Sampled:

10/27 /99 Sampled By:

Jim Riggs By Order Of:

Karen Morgan Order No:

Material Represented:

Brown Silty Sand LAB NO:

S-26580 Test Method: ASTM D2922B 03017 3

4 330' North 320'North and 515' and 520' East of East of Edge Edge 4.1 3.9 111.4 114.8 107.0 110.5 110.2 110.2 12.6 12.6 S-6718 S-6718 12/2/94 12/2/94 97.1 100.3 95+

95+

MEETS COMPACTION SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Charge:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Orig. & 1-cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SM1PLE(S) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATNE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS OR PROCEOORES. NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ONGOING QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT AND ME NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUf SPEGIRG WRIITEN PERMISSION.

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Client:

0220KER31 4/6/01 Cimarron Cell #3, Lift 5 File No:

Kerr McGee Corporation CORPORATE OFFICE and CENTRAL LABORATORY 3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 CA77 Exp. 06/30/01 Area Offices 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND ENID, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK 74146 (580) 237-3130 (580) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 5358 S. 125TH EAST AVE., STE B KER31 Date Sampled: 3/21/01 Sampled By:

S. Humphrey By Order Of: Jim Crawford Order No:

Material Represented:

Red Sandy Clay REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF SUBGRADE FILL LAB NO:

S-0283 Specification:

95% Compaction TEST RESULTS Test No.

1 2

Location 420'North 355' North 515' East 522' East Percent Moisture 9.6 12.7 Wet Density, pcf 126.4 124.9 Dry Density, pcf 115.3 110.8 Standard Proctor Density, pcf 116.6 116.6 Optimum Moisture,%

13.4 13.4 Proctor Density No.

S-6944 S-6944 Date of Proctor 12/29/94 12/29/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 98.9 95.0 Required 95+

95+

Test Method: ASTM 029228 D3017 3

4 5

335'North 305' North 295' North 512' East 515' East 525' East 11.0 12.1 11.5 124.4 125.6 126.1 112.1 112.0 113.1 116.6 116.6 116.6 13.4 13.4 13.4 S-6944 S-6944 S-6944 12/29/94 12/29/94 12/29/94 96.1 96.1 97.0 95+

95+

MEETS COMPACTION SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Charge:

Kerr McGee Corporation Orig. & 1 Same 1-cc Laboratory ReCE1VED APR O 9 2001 safety & Environ Culhlno Respectfully submitted, STANDARD TESTING AND E THIS REPORT APPLIES otl. Y TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE($) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PROOUCTS OR PROCEDURES, NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ONGOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Urt.ESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXQ.USIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED a.lENT AND ARE NOT TO BE REPROOUCEO WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

05/02/2001 12:59 FAX 405 282 3358 Sent By: STANDARD TESTlN0j CIMARRON 4055280559;

-+ CHASE May-2-01 13:01; raJ 001 Page 2/2 r:rt1*-----~------------...

r ANO !.Nt:!NEERJNC~Atfft' CORPORATE OFFICE.,d CENTRAL LABORATORY 3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHOMA CllYw OK 73105 (405) 528--05'i CA77 Exp. O&r.10/01 902 TIWLS WEST LOOP 900 $.E. SECOND 5358 S.125~ E!AST AW.. STI: 8

&:caOfflQea ENID, Ot< 73703 LAWfON, OK 73501 TULSA. OK7... 146 (680J 237-3130 (580) 353-0072 (918) 459-2700 Aoct. No:

0220KER31 File No:

KER31 Report Date:

Project:

Location; ArchJEngr.

Client:

5/2/01 Clmanon Facility Cell #3, Lift 6 Kerr McGee Corporation REPORT:

Specification:

FIELD DENSITY OF SUBGRADE FILL 95% Compaction TEST RESULTS Test No.

1 2

Location 400 North 375 North 520 East 525 East Percent Moisture 1~.6 11.9 Wet Denstty, pd 128.9 124.8 Orv Density, pcf 114.5 111.5 Standard Proctor Density. pcf 11e.e 116.6 Optiml..{m Moisture, %

13.4 13.4 Proctor DensitY No.

S-6944 s.. a944 Date of Proctor 12/29/94 12/29/94

% of std. Proctor Density 98.2 95.6 Required 95+

95+

Date Sampled: 3/27/01 Sampled By:

N. Graves By Order Of~

Jim Crawford Order No:

MateriaJ Represented: Red Sandy Clay 3

LAB NO: S-0380 Test Me1hod: ASTM D2922B D3017 4

5 3SO North 325 North 300 North 524East

~27 East 522 East 13.9 11.2 12.0 129...2 124.0 125.2 113.4 111,5 111.8 116.6 11e.e 116.6 13.4 13.4 13.4 S-6944 S-6944 S-6944 12/29/94 12/29194 12/29/94 97.3 9tL5 95.9 95+

95+

Q5+

MEETS SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Charge:

KelT McGee Corporation Orig. & 1 Same 1-cc Laboratory

~-......._ __ _

HATU11£ SAVER111 FAX IWEMD 81618 To Phone I Phone#

0,10212001 WRD 12:56

[TX/RX NO 5303)

APPENDIX V - CAP COMPACTION TEST RESULTS

CLOSURE COVER PIT #1 FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS TEST METHODS ASTM D2922B, ASTM 1SS6-90

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 2/22/95 Cimarron Corp., Crescent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cimarron Corporation CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABOOATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 902 Trails West loop 900 S.E 2nd 5806 S. 129th East Ave.

Branch Offices Daffas, TX 75247 Enid, OK 73703 Lawton, OK 73501 Tulsa, OK 74134 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Date Sampled: 2/22/95 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor Contractor:

Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

By Order Of:

K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity Red Silty Clayey Represented: Sand REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF 1st LIFT (Cover Material < 1' Thick)

LAB NO: See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 Specification:

Laboratory No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Dry Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Density ReQuired Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech TEST RESULTS 7480 7481 7482 7483 306m North; 316m North; 381m North; 411m North; 575m East 570m East 559m East 569m East 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 127.4 126.7 127.3 125.2 116.4 115.6 116.3 114.4 117.2 117.2 117.2 117.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 6722 6722 6722 6722 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 99.3 98.6 99.2 97.6 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Respectfully submitted, STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

1chardW.~.~

./

"TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILV INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLV 10£NTICAl.

OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS, ORPROCEOURES. NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

Acct. No:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 Report Date:

2/24/95 Project:

Cimarron Corp., Crescent, OK Location:

Burial Ground #4 Arch./Engr:

Cimarron Corporation Contractor:

Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABCAATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 902 Trails West Loop 900S.E. 2nd 5806 S. 1291h East Ave.

Branch Offices Dallas, TX 75247 Enid, OK 73703 Lawton, OK 73501 Tulsa OK 74134 Date Sampled: 2/24/95 (214) 631-4372 1405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 1918) 459-2700 Sampled By: S. Batchelor By Order Of:

K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity Red Sandy Clay Represented:

REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF 2nd Lift Cover Material LAB NO:

See Below

<12" Thick Specification:

Test Method: ASTM D29228 TEST RESULTS Laboratory No.

7528 7529 7530 7531 Location 301m North; 321m North; 391m North; 411m North; 570m East 580m East 560m East 569m East Percent Moisture 6.7 8.6 7.4 6.8 Wet Density Lbs.ICU. Ft.

119.4 123.8 122.9 120.8 Dry Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

111.9 113.9 114.4 113.1 Standard Proctor Density 116.6 116.6 116.6 116.6 Optimum Moisture 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4 Proctor Density No.

6944 6944 6944 6944 Date of Proctor 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-29-94

% of Std. Proctor Density 96.0 97.7 98.1 97.0 Required 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1 cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1 ~cc StanTech "TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLE~S) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IOENTICAL 2~e5~~~~s ;~ii~~~*u~iWi~~i1\\~ei~~coi:it~mte~~l~iTtN~ ON GOING QUALITY ASSU ANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO

'Zllan:l'ecJ:,

'ff&'=\\~

ANO ENGINEERING COMPANV Acct. No:

Report Date:

ECH15 3/2/95 File No:

1395-1353 CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABffiATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 902 Trails West Loop 900S.E 2nd 5806 S. 129th East Ave.

Branch Offices Dallas, TX 75247 Enid, OK 73703 Lawton, OK 73501 Tulsa, OK 74134 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Project:

Location:

Cimarron Corp., Crescent, OK Burial Ground #4 Date Sampled: 2/28/95 Sampled By: S. Batchelor By Order Of:

K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity Red Sandy Clay Represented:

Arch./Er.igr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

Laboratory No.

Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

FIELD DENSITY OF 3rd Lift Cover Material

<12" Thick TEST RESULTS 7603 7604 7605 LAB NO: See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 7606 Location 286m North; 306m North; 321m North; 381m North; Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu.Ft.

Dry Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Density Required Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech 570m East 570m East 565m East 559m East 7.8 7.5 9.2 8.9 123.7 120.0 127.0 121.9 114.7 111.6 116.3 111.9 116.6 116.6 116.6 116.6 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4 6944 6944 6944 6944 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 98.4 95.9 99.7 96.0 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Respectfully submitted, STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

"TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE IS) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARlLV lffOl~TIVE Of THE QUAI.ITIE~ Qf APl'AREKTI.V IDEKTICAI.

OR SIMILAR PROOUCTS. OR PROCEDURES, NOR 00 THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT AND ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITIEN PERMISSION.

1:11an2'ecll

~-~~

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 3/13/95 Cimarron Corp., Crescent, OK Burial Ground #4 Cimarron Corporation Cimarron Corp. {Chase Environmental)

CORPORATE OFFICE &CENTRAL LABCRATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Ar1hur Drive 902 Trails West Loop 900 S.E. 2nd 5806 S. 1291h East Ave.

Branch Offices Dallas, TX 75247 Enid, OK 73703 Lawton, OK 73501 Tulsa, OK 74134 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Date Sampled: 3/8/95 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor By Order Of:

K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity See below Represented:

REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF 4th Lift Cover Material

< 12" Thick LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 Specification:

6719 - Brown Clayey Silty Sand 6944 - Red Sandy Clay Laboratorv No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

-*Dry Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std. Proctor Density Required Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech TEST RESULTS 7641 7642 7643 7644 291m North; 306m North; 366m North; 406m North; 580m East 580m East 559m East 557m East 12.8 15.0 15.9 14.1 130.8 129.0 129.5 125.4 116.0 112.2 111.7 109.9 116.6 116.6 116.6 115.7 13.4 13.4 13.4 12.6 6944 6944 6944 6719 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-29-94 12-2-94 99.5 96.2 95.8 95.0 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR "TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDAROS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPLEAS) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INOICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF o\\PPA.R!.NTLV 1oeNTICII.L

~~t~~ns :~ii~~~*uii;~w~i~~\\SPEi~riii:-A.-mfe~:liiroiN ON GOING QUALITY ASSU ANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT AND

Acct. No:

ECH15 File No:

1395-1353 Report Date:

3/13/95 Project:

Cimarron Corp., Crescent, OK Location:

Burial Ground #4 Arch./Engr:

Cimarron Corporation Contractor:

Cimarron Corp. (Chase Environmental)

CORPORATE OFFICE & CENTRAL LABOiATORY 3400 N. Lincoln Okla. City, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 9200 King Arthur Drive 902 Trails West Loop 900 S.E 2nd 5806 S. 129th East Ave.

Branch Offices Dallas, TX 75247 Enid, OK 73703 Lawton, OK 73501 Tulsa, OK 7 4134 (214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Date Sampled: 3/10/95 Sampled By:

S. Batchelor By Order Of:

K. Crawford Order No: CEG E411003 Quantity Red Clayey Silty Represented: Sand REPORT:

FIELD.DENSITY OF Final 4th Lift Cover LAB NO:

See Below Specification:

Laboratol'\\I No.

Location Percent Moisture Wet Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Ory Density Lbs./Cu. Ft.

Standard Proctor Density Optimum Moisture Proctor Density No.

Date of Proctor

% of Std.* Proctor Density Required Charge:

Chase Environmental Orig. & 1 cc Same 1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

1-cc StanTech Material < 12" Thick Test Method: ASTM 029228 TEST RESULTS 7648 7649 7650 7651 291m North; 306m North; 366m North; 406m North; 580m East 580m East 559m East 557m East 8.5 10.2 13.2 11.4 129.0 129.7 131.6 128.2 118.9 117.7 116.2 115.1 118.2 118.2 118.2 118.2 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 6721 6721 6721 6721 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 12-2-94 100.6 99.6 98.3 97.4 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR

" TEST FOR ASSURANCE" THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE~S) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INOICATIVE Of THE QUALITIES OF APPA~tNTLV IOENTIC~L f~lN~1~S,r~i~~bi*ui~&'Wi1~g~~~sp;t:~riii~~:Vei:1iir o\\~ ON GOl~G QUALITY ASSU ANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE AOORESSED CLIENT AND

CLOSURE COVER PIT #2 FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS TEST METHOD ASTM D2922B, ASTM 1556-90

Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

9200 KING ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND 2CH98 5/6/98 File No:

5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

CH98 Controlled Fill Project Cimarron Corp, Cresent, OK Cap Cell #2**

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

FIELD DENSITY OF 1ST** LIFT (12" THICK)

TEST RESULTS

- Corrected Report Dated 05/05/98

S6722/Red Silty Clayey Sand

S6720/Brown Clayey Silty Sand Area Offices DALLAS, TX 75247 ENID, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK 7 4134 Date 10/02/96 Sampled:

(214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Sampled By:

Jim Riggs By Order Of: Joe Kegin Order No:

Quantity See Below*

Represented:

LAB NO: See Below Test Method: ASTM D29228 D3017 Laboratory No.

S-4604 S-4605 S-4607 S-4608 Location 548E 548 E 548 E 540 E 400 N 345 N 315 N 304N Percent Moisture 8.7 8.6 7.5 8.5 Wet Density, pcf 124.3 123.5 118.0 121.9 Dry Density, pcf 114.4 113.7 109.8 112.4 Standard Proctor Density, pcf 117.2 117.2 113.0 113.0 Optimum Moisture, %

12.2 12.2 13.9 13.9 Proctor Density No.

6722 6722 6720 6720 Date of Proctor 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 97.6 97.0 97.2 99.5 Reouired 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Charge:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Respectfully submitted, Orig. & 1 *cc same STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

1-cc Laboratory 1*cc Cimarron Corp.

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED AND/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS, OR PROCEDURES. NOR 00 THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSUAANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS Aki: FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRJnEN PERMISSION.

MAY 1 1 *1:J:J~M 3400 N. UNCOLNt OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 Ca77 Exp. 06/30/99 Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

REPORT:

Specification:

9200 KING ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP

~--***************~-....... 900 S.E. SECOND 2CH98 5/6/98 File No:

5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

CH98 Controlled Fill Project Cimarron Corp, Cresent, OK Cap Cell #2*

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

FIELD DENSITY OF 2ND* LIFT (12" THICK)

TEST RESULTS

Corrected Report Dated 05/05/98 Area Qfflm..

DALLAS. TX 75247 ENID. OK 73703 LAwttlN, OK 73501 TULSA, OK 7 4134 Date 10/04/96 Sampled:

(214) 631-4372 (405) 237-3130 (405) 353-0872 (918) 459-2700 Sampled By: Jim Riggs By Order Of: Joe Kegin Order No:

Quantity Brown Silty Represented:

Sand LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 03017 Laboratorv No.

S-4723 S-4724 S-4725 S-4726 location 420N

, 558N 325N 290 N 543 E 540 E 545 E 546 E Percent Moisture 6.0 6.6 5.2 5.9 Wet Density, ocf 114.0 114.2 111.0 111.3 Drv Densitv, ocf 107.5 107.1 105.5 105.1 Standard Proctor Density, pcf 110.2 110.2 110.2 110.2 Ootimum Moisture, %

12.6 12.6 12.6 12.6 Proctor Density No.

6718 6718 6718 6718 Date of Proctor 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94 12/02/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 97.5 97.2 95.7 95.4 Reauired 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Charge:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Respectfully submitted, Orig. & 1--cc same STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED ANO TO THE SAMPlE(S) TES TEO ANO/OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARIL v INDICATIVE Of THE QUALITIES Of APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES. NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS Aht FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECl~IC WRITIEN PERMISSION.

Acct. No:

2CH98 File No:

CH98 Report Date:

5/6/98 Project:

Location:

Controlled Fill Project Cimarron Corp, Cresent, OK Cap Cell #2*

Date Sampled:

10/10/96 Sampled By: Jim Riggs By Order Of: Joe Kegin Order No:

E411003 Quantity Brown Clayey Represented:

Silty Sand Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY OF 3RD* LIFT (12" THICK)

Specification:

TEST RESULTS

Corrected Report Dated 05/05/98 Laboratory No.

S-4866 S-4867 Location 386 N 361 N 533 E 534E Percent Moisture 8.0 6.3 Wet Density, pcf 117.7 119.9 Dry Density, pcf 109.0 112.8 Standard Proctor Density, pcf 113.0 113.0 Optimum Moisture, %

13.9 13.9 Proctor Density No.

6720 6720 Date of Proctor 12/02/94 12/02/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 96.5 99.8 Required 95+MSR 95+MSR S-4868 346 N 535 E 7.2 117.1 109.2 113.0 13.9 6720 LAB NO:

See Below Test Method: ASTM D29228 D3017 S-4869 311 N 553 E 8.2 116.4 107.6 113.0 13.9 6720 12/02/94 12/02/94 96.6 95.2 95+MSR 95+MSR Charge:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Respectfully submitted, Orig. & 1-cc same STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

~

)'

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED ANO/OR OBSERVED AND ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF APPARENTLY IDENTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES. NOR 00 THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSUAANCE PROGRAM UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS Aflt FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT AND ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

3400 N. LINCOLN* OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 Ca77 Exp. 06/30/99 9200 KING ARTHUR DRIVE 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND 5806 S. 129 EAST AVE.

Area Offir,es

'DAL~ TX 75247 ENID, OK 73703 tAWl'ON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK 7 4134 (214) 631-4372

{405) 237.3130 (405) 353--0872 (918) 459-2700 Acct. No:

2CH98 FiiEtNo:.......

p CH98 Report Date:

5/6/98 Project:

Location:

Controlled Fill Project Cimarron Corp, Cresent, OK Cap Cell #2*

Date Sampled:

10/15/96 Sampled By: Jim Riggs By Order Of: Joe Kegin Order No:

Arch./Engr:

Contractor:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Quantity Brown Silty Represented: Sand REPORT:

FIELD DENSITY ON COMPACTED 4TH* LIFT LAB NO: See Below Test Method: ASTM 029228 03017

(<12" THICK)

Specification:

TEST RESULTS

Corrected Report Dated 05/05/98 Laboratorv No.

S-4993 S-4994 S-4995 S-4996 Location 400 N 375N 334 N 328N 541 E 535E 550E 542E 4th Lift 4th Lift 4th Lift 4th Lift Percent Moisture 8.1 5.6 6.2 9.3 Wet Density, pcf 120.3 118.8 115.0 118.9 Drv Densitv, pcf 111.3 112.5 108.3 108.8 Standard Proctor Density, pcf 113.0 113.0 113.0 113.0 Optimum Moisture, %

13.9

13.

13.9 13.9 Proctor Density No.

6720 6720 6720 6720 Date of Proctor 12/02/94 12/02194 12/02/94 12/02/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 98.5 99.6 95.8 96.3 Reauired 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR 95+MSR Charge:

Chase Environmental Group, Corp.

Orig. & 1-cc same Respectfully submitted, STANDARD TESTING AND ENGINEERING CO.

1-cc Laboratory 1-cc Cimarron Corp.

THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS OR PROCEDURES INDICATED AND TO THE SAMPLE(S) TES TEO ANOtOR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE OUALITIES Of AP PARE NTL Y 1DNTICAL OR SIMILAR PRODUCTS. OR PROCEDURES. NOii 00 THEY REPRESENT AN ON GOING QUALITY ASSUAANCE PROGRAM! UNLESS SO NOTED. THESE REPORTS AF!t FOR TH£ EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE ADDRESSED CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PEAMISS10N.

CLOSURE COVER PIT #3 FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS TEST METH()D ASTMD2922B, ASTMlSS6-90

. 05/02/2001. 11: 59 FA;{_ 405 281 3358 CIMARRON

-+ CHASE

~001 MDARQ r TES11NQ,-------------------------------~

r *~

ANOtNGINEE!'INGCOMPANY CORPORATE OFFICE and CENTRAL LABORATORY 3400 N. LINCOLN1 OKLAHOMA CITY. OK73105 (405) 528-0S41 CATT Exp. 06/30/01 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 s.e. SECOND 5358 S. 125'" EAST AVE., STE B Acea QffiJ>>.!

ENID, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK 74146 (580) 237 *3130 (SBO) 3S3-0872 (916) 459-2700 Acct. No:

0220KER31 File No:

KER31 Report Date:

4/25/01 Project:

Cimarron Location:

Cell #3, Lift 7 Arch./Engr:

Client:

Kerr McGee Corporation REPORT:

Specification:

FIELD DENSITY OF SUBGRADE FILL 95% Compaction TEST R-ESUL TS Test No.

1 2

Location 420 North, 395 North, 522 East 426 East*.

Percent Moisture 13.4 15.3 Wet Density. pcf 126.2 129.0 Dry Density. pcf 111.3 111.9 Standard Proctor Density, pcf 116.6 116.6 Optimum Moisture, %

13.4 13.4 Proctor Density No.

S-6994 S-6994 Date of Proctor 12129/94 12/29/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 95.5 95.9 Required 95+

95+

Date sampled: 4/4/01 Sampled By:

Jim Riggs By Order Of:

Jim Crawford Order No:

Material Represented:

Red Sandy Clay LAB NO: S-0417 Test Method:

ASTM D29228 D3017 3

4 5

355 North1 315 North, 300 North, 512 East 512 East 520 East 13.9 13.2 12.8 127.4 130.5 127.3 111.8 115.3 112.9 116.6 116.6 116.6 13.4 13.4 13.4 S-6994 S-6994 S-6994 12/29/94 12/29/94 12/29/94 95.9 98.9 96.8 95+

95+

MEETS COMPACTION SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

- ~

-....... -.~-~--* -------=--~-........... _... - -~---* *---- ---~------~-----* -.-..-.--

Charge:

Kerr McGee Corporation Orig. & 1 Same 1-cc Laboratory BECEJVED Phont,.

Pnone t I

Ful Ful

~~

OBSEIWED MO i\\AE HOTNECfSSAN.Y aa7An\\/i CP"'MWAUT& Cl' RttAA&Hn.Y ~

JW,t lNJ!SS $0 HCmD.. THESE REPORTS ME~ TIE ECCUJSI\\'! OS& OF lllEADORESSel CUEfff J.'40

05/02/2001 11:59 FAX 405 282 3358 CIMARRON

~ CHASE

~002 S,ANDARQ ______________ ~---~

.,,.-='f BSTINQ~

r ANcENG1111EERJNGcoMPAtff CORPORATE OFFICE and CENTRAL LABORATORY 3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK73105 (40!5) 028--0541 CA77 Exp. 06130/01 Aa:a Offiw 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 S.E. SECOND ENfD, OK 73703 LAWTON, OK 73501 TULSA, OK 74146 (580) 237-3130 (580) 353--0an

{918) 459-2700 ts358 5. 125' EAST AVE., STE B Acct No:

Report Date:

Project Location:

Arch./Engr:

0220KER31 4/25/01 Cimarron Cell #3, Uft8 File No:

KER31 Client:

Kerr McGee Corporation REPORT:

Specification:

FIELD DENSITY OF SUBGRADE FILL 95% Compaction TEST RESUl TS Test No.

1 2

Location 405 Norths 370 North, 520 East 527 East Percent Moisture 8.4 8.3 Wet Density, pcf 125.6 120.6 Dry DensltyJ pcf 115.9 111.4 Standard Proctor Density, pcf 116.6 116.6 OJJtimum Moisture, %

13.4 13.4 Proctor Density No.

S-6994 S-6994 Date of Proctor 12/29/94 12129/94

% of Std. Proctor Densi~

99.4 95.5 Required 95+

95+

Date Sampted: 4/16/01 Sampled By:

S. Humphrey By Order Of: Jim Crawford Order No:

Material Represented: Red Sandy Clay LAB NO: S-0564 Test Method: ASTM D29228 03017 3

4 5

350 North, 340 North, 310 North, 517 East 510 East 510 East 7.3 7.9 8.7 122.3 126.8 126.0 114.0 117.5 115.9 116.6 116.6 116.6 13.4 13.4 13.4 S-6994 S-6994 S-6994 12/29/94 12/29/94 12129/94 97.8 100.8 99.4 95+

95+

95-f MEETS COMPACTION SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Charge; Kerr McGee Corporation Orig. & 1 Same 1-cc Laboratory R!CEIVED APR :, u ?001 iafl1.Y & Environ Cushing

05/16/2001 10:38 FAX 405 282 3358 CIMARRON

~ CHASE 141001

~rtlffQ;,--------~----~-~-O-M-~-Of_R_C_E_a_n_d_C_E-~-~--~--M-1-0-~~

3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHONA CllY, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 CA77 Exp. 06130/01

&eJOfflces 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP 900 SJ:. SECOND ENID, OK 73703

\\.AWTON, OK 73501 TULSA. OK 74148 (580) 237..J130 (080) 353-0872 (918)~2700 5358 S. 125TH eASTAVE., STE B Acct. No:

0220KER31 5/10/01 Cimarron Cell #3, Lift 9 File No:

KER31 Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

Client:

Kerr McGee Corporation REPORT:

Specification:

FIELD DENSITY OF SUBGRADE FILL 95% Compaction

-*-- -*-.. ::::::;e-.. ~.-.-

TEST RESULTS Test No.

1 2

Location 425 North 415 North 525 East 515 East Percent Moisture 7.1 6.6 Wet Density, pcf 113.9 114.9 Dry Density, pcf 106.3 107.8 Standard Proctor Density, pcf 110.2 110.2 Optimum Moisture, %

12.6 12.6 Proctor Density No.

S-6718*

S-6718"11' Date of Proctor 12/2/94 12/2/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 96.6 97.8 Required 95+

95+

Date Sampled:

5/3/01 Sampled By: S. Humphrey By Order Of: Jim Crawford Order No:

3 Material Represented: Various LAB NO: S-0821 Test Method: ASTM 029228 03017. _ _ -**-

4!

5 380 North 335 North 315 North I

528 East 525 East 512 East 7.0 9.1 I

6.8 112.7.

126.9 !

. 114.9 105.3 116.3 !

107.6 110.2 116.6 I

110.2 12.6 13.4 12.6 S-6718*

5-5944**

S-6718*

12/2/94 12/29/94 12/2/94 95.6 99.8 97.6 95+

95+

MEETS COMPACTION SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

s=-s11 a

Brown* Silty Sand

- S-6944 Red Sandy Cl~y Charge:

Kerr McGee Corporation Orig. & 1 Same 1 *cc Laboratory

RECEIVED Tt fl_.

Ca.JD,pt.

Pflollf #

indschuti,* P.E.

- ~(ro(O(

f-IiANDAR~

I A!]#o!JJ!!!

-~-~-r;:J-~-"7-'1-fr\\~-

1

-!-----C-0-RP_O_RA_T_E_O-FF-IC_E_a-nd_C_E-NT_RA_L_LA_BO-RA-TO_R_Y_

l=!JV:::J~~ \\'!.I~

3400 N. LINCOLN, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73105 (405) 528-0541 CA77 Exp. 06/30/01 MA) l :1 2'101 Area Offices 902 TRAILS WEST LOOP ENID, OK 73703 (580) 237-3130 900 S.E. SECOND LAWTON, OK 73501 (580) 353-0872

------------******---~a S. 125' EAST AVE., STE B TULSA, OK 74146 (918) 459*2700 Acct. No:

Report Date:

Project:

Location:

Arch./Engr:

0220KER31 5/15/01 Cimarron Cell 3, Lift #10 File No:

KER31 Client:

Kerr McGee Corporation REPORT:

Specification:

FIELD DENSITY OF SUBGRADE FILL 95% Compaction TEST RESULTS Test No.

1 2

Location 400 N 380N 527 E 512 E Percent Moisture 5.7 6.5 Wet Density, pcf 117.8 121.8 Dry Density, pcf 111.4 114.4 Standard Proctor Density, pcf 110.2 110.2 Optimum Moisture, %

12.6 12.6 Proctor Density No.

S-6718 S-6718 Date of Proctor 12/12/94 12/12/94

% of Std. Proctor Density 101.1 103.8 Required 95+

95+

Date Sampled: 5/10/01 Sampled By:

N. Graves By Order Of: Jim Crawford Order No:

Material Represented:

Brown Silty Sand LAB NO: S-0883 Test Method: ASTM 029228 03017 3

4 5

340 N 320 N 300 N 520 E 510 E 510 E 8.9 3.9 9.6 124.4 110.5 121.9 114.2 106.4 111.2 110.2 110.2 110.2 12.6 12.6 12.6 S-6718 S-6718 S-6718 12/12/94 12/12/94 12/12/94 103.6 96.6 100.9 95+

95+

MEETS COMPACTION SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS Charge:

Kerr McGee Corporation Orig. & 1 Same 1-cc Laboratory THIS REPORT APPLIES ONLY TO THE STANDARDS 0A PROCEDURES INDICAiEO ANO TO THE SAMPLE(S) TESTED AND,OR OBSERVED ANO ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF THE QUALITIES OF AP::ARENTt.Y IDENTICAL OR SlMII.AR PRODUCTS OR PROCEDURES. NOR DO THEY REPRESENT AN CMK>ING QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM UNLESS so NOTED. THESE RE.::l()RTS ARE FOR THE EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE AOc:;esseo CLIENT ANO ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT SPECIFIC WRITTEN PERMISSION.

APPENDIX VI - FINAL CAP CONTOUR DRAWING

BTP Option 2 On-Site Site Disposal Cell Report for Cimarron Corporations Former Nuclear Fuel Fabrication Facility Crescent, Ok
Person / Time
ML19364A238
Site:	07000925
Issue date:	11/22/2019
From:	Cimarron Corp
To:	Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
Shared Package
ML19365A023	List: ML19361A179 ML19363A001 ML19363A002 ML19363A003 ML19363A004 ML19363A005 ML19363A006 ML19363A007 ML19363A008 ML19363A009 ML19363A010 ML19363A011 ML19363A013 ML19363A014 ML19363A015 ML19363A016 ML19364A126 ML19364A231 ML19364A232 ML19364A233 ML19364A234 ML19364A235 ML19364A236 ML19364A237 ML19364A238 ML19364A239
References
Download: ML19364A238 (79)
v • d • e

ML19364A238

Text

2.0 BACKGROUND

2.0 BACKGROUND

Navigation menu

Search