ML19351E451

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards IE Insp Rept 50-361/80-17 on 800919-1016.No Noncompliance Noted
ML19351E451
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre 
Issue date: 11/07/1980
From: Crews J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To: Papay L
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML19351E452 List:
References
NUDOCS 8012100140
Download: ML19351E451 (2)


See also: IR 05000361/1980017

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:T/ C u# "%g d" ., 1 ' , o UNITED STATES 3 f;j

!}*)'.7, ' ,j y . NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o '" c- ,\\ c REGION V o C< o, Z,' [ 1990 N. CAltFORNI A DOULEVARD h2 _ , ' ' ' ' SUITE 202, WALNUT CREEK PLAZA fd57 { e

  • ,,,

WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 9450G 0'$ j ' Ell! ' 1: ' nb 7 meg - ., --< g 5 I -

Docket No. 50-361 I Southern California Edison Company P. O. Box 800 2244 Walnut Grove Avenue Rosemead, California 91770 Attention: Dr. L. T. Papay, Vice President Advanced Engineering Gentlemen: Subject: NRC Inspection of San Onofre Unit No. 2 This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. A. Johnson, A. Chaffee, and R. Pate of this office on September 19 to October 16, 1980, of activities author- ized by NRC Construction Permit No. CPPR-97, and to the discussion of our findings held by Mr. Pate with Mr. Ray and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection. Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection < report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and obser- vations by the inspectors. No items of noncompliance with NRC requirements were identified within the scope of this inspection. In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room. If this report contains any information that you believe to be proprietary, it is necessary that you submit a written application to this office, within 20 days of the date of this letter, requesting that such information be withheld from public disclosure. The application must include a full statement of the reasons why it is claimed that the information is proprietary. The application should be prepared so that any proprietary information identified is contained in an enclosure to the application, since the application without the enclosure will also be placed in the Public Document Room. If we do not hear from you in this regard dthin the specified period, the report will be placed in the Public Document Room. \\%b $012100 _ . - -- - - - - -

. Southern California Edison Company -2- . . . , 7 1330 , I Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad to discuss them with you. Sincerely, /[[ ,J. [ hief [ Reactor Operations and Nuclear Support Branch Enclosure: IE Inspection Report No. 40-361/80-17 cc w/o enclosure: Mr. R. Dietch, Vice President Nuclear Engineering & Operations, SCE , }}