ML19350D722
| ML19350D722 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/04/1981 |
| From: | Chamberlain D, Costello J, Hale C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19350D711 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900507 NUDOCS 8105180459 | |
| Download: ML19350D722 (11) | |
Text
-.-
~
O u.S. NoctE4R RE0utaTORv C0mmISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT REGION IV Report No. 99900507/81-01 Program No. 51200 Company:
Sargent & tundy Engineers SS East Monroe Street Chicago, Illinois 60603 Inspection Conducted:
January 19-23, 1981 Inspectors:
k O
~f J. R.
ello~, Principaf Enspector Date Prog
- _ valuation Sec' tion Vendor Inspection Branch TI
~
~
- 0. D. W. erlain, Con p $ tor Inspector Dass Program Tvaluation Sectidh Vendor Inspection Branch Approved by:
/
[
C. J. HalerCpief Date Program Ev&Mation Section Vendor Inspection Branch Summary Inspection on January 19-23, 1981 (99900507/81-01)
Areas Insoected:
Implementation of Sargent & tundy Topical Report SL-TR-1A, Revision 5, in the areas of Design Ir.put, Design Document Control, Technical Personnel Background Verification, and action on previous inspection findings.
The inspection involved sixty-four (64) hours on site by two (2) uSNRC inspec-i tors.
Results:
In the four (4) areas inspected there were no unresolved items.
Three (3) nonconformances were identified in two (2) areas.
Nonconformances:
Design Document Control - The Design Criteria Status Report did not snow tne latest revision or issue date of a design criteria document.
(See Notice of Nonconformance, Item A).
Some design criteria documents do not include the applicable issues of codes, standards, or regulatory guides. (See Notice of Nonconformance, Itsm 8.) Design Input - Contrary to commitment, an electrical Class IE component was misclassified in the Clinton Power Station Classification Criteria document.
(See Notice of Nonconformance, Item C).
6 Bi105180
2 OETAILS SECTION I (Prepared by J. R. Costello)
A.
Persons Contacted G. A. Boelke, Assistant Head, Employee Relations Division K. A. Davis, Clerical Supervisor, Employee Relations Division
- 8. G. Ghi'arducci, Assistant Chief, Structural Drafting Section
- A. P. Gilliss Administrative Head, Quality Assurance Division E. L. Gradassi, Project Supervisor, Electrical Design 1 Drafting Division G. C. Kao, Coordinator Structural Analytical Division J. R. Lazowski, Project Leader, Mechanical Design & Drafting Div1sion P. J. Meehan, Head, Employee Relations Division W. R. Neubauer, Project Leader Electrical Design & Drafting Division G. N. Nuestro, Section Leader, Mechanical Piping Support Section M. E. O' Conner, Project Leader J. A. Patel, Supervising Design Engineer, Design Engineering Division R. Rabin, Senior Quality Assurance Coordinator R. Rutha, Project Leader Mechanical T. J. Ryan, Assistant Chief Structural Design Engineering Section J. J. Talamo, Senior Quality Assurance Administrator B. G. Treece, Senior Electrical Project Engineer
- Denotes those present at exit meeting.
B.
Action on Previous Inspection Findings 1.
(0 pen) Deviation (Report No. 80-02, Item A):
Contrary to commitment there are no procedures / measures which require obsoleting, recalling or identifying non-current drawing prints.
Instructions have beeq issued by internal memos instructing affected personnel that all files not maintained by Engineering Records (stick files and individual drawings) shall carry a warning sticker which states "For Ref3rence Only - For design input, ensure the use of the latest revision."
In addition to the internal memos, QA Procedure GQ-3.07 will be revised by February 28, 1981, to cover this area of Concern.
2.
(Closed) Deviation (Report No. 80-02, Item 3):
Contrary to procedural requirements, the project drawing list was not updated to show the current revision of a structural drawing.
The project drawing list dated October 1980, has been revised to correct this specific finding.
In addition, internal audit #44 was l
l completed on December 19, 1981, which had additional findings.
To l
prevent recurrence of the type of finding, instructions have been l
issued for documentation personnel to conduct an audit of the drawing l
lists every six (6) months.
- 1
-ma
.-.-n-u e
I 3
C.
Technical Personnel Background Verif'^:ation 1.
Objectives To verify that measures heve been established and are being effectively isolamented tnat assure:
a.
The education and work experience information contained in employee's job applications are being verified by the employing organization.
b.
There is objective, documented evidence / records that attest to the employee's education and experience.
2.
Method of Accomolishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by examination of:
a.
Personnel files of nine (9) employees which included five (5) employees educated in foreign countries, b.
Employee Relations file on contract personnel.
c.
Employee Relations proceoure E-7, Revision 0, Previous Employment, Design Verification and Updating Degree Status.
d.
Employee Relations Procedure E-8, Draft 3 of Revision 0, Procurement of Contract Personnel.
3.
Findings a.
Sargent & Lundy (S&L) requires that employment agencies furnishing contract personnel verify their education and previous work experience.
b.
S&L has procedures in place which require written verification of previous education and work experience of S&L employees, c.
New employees work is closely monitored by supervision.
In the case of a falsified record being discovered after an employee is on the payroll, S&L supervision examines the circumstances and makes a detendination what to do with the employees previous work and what to do with the employee on a case by case basis, d.
In cases where it is difficult to verify previous education (Iron Curtain Countries) S&L requires a copy of the degree, diploma or certificate with a translation into English, shcwing completion of a course of studies.
6 a i
~
l
~
4 e.
In cases where foreign work experience can not be verified S&L supervision closely monitors the new employee and then determines what jobs the employee say work on.
f.
No nonconformances or unresolved items were identified in this area of the inspection.
D.
Desicn Occument Control 1.
Objectives To determine that approved procedures have been established and are being implemented for the control and distribution of design documents that provide for:
a.
Identification of personnel positions or organizations respons-ible for preparing, reviewing, approving, and issuing design documents.
5 Identification of the proper documents to be used in performing the design.
c.
Coordination and control of design (internal and external) inter-face documents.
d.
Ascertaining that proper documents, and revisions thereto, are accessible and are being used.
Establishing distribution lists which are updated and main-e.
tained current.
2.
Method of Acccmolishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by an examination of:
a.
Sargent & Lundy Topical Report 51-TR-1A, Revision 5.
b.
Implementing procedures to satisfy quality assurance program commitments and to satisfy the intent of the objectives section.
These procedures are:
(1) General Quality Assurance Procedures GQ-3.03, Revision 4, GQ-3.04, Revision 5, GQ-3.06, Revision 1, GQ-3.07, Revision 4, GQ-3.08, Revision 4, and GQ-3.12, Revision 3.
(2) Project Instructions PI-38-05, Revision 7, PI-38-06, Revision 0, PI-38-10, Revision 1; and PI-B8-14, Revision 1.
(3) Mechanical Department Standard MAS-7, Revision 0, Method i
For Reviewing Sargent & Lundy Mechanical Design Drawings.
i (4) General Drafting Standard GDS-4.1.1, Revision 2, Processing of Comments on Sargent & Lundy Drawings.
-~
e-W
5 c.
Documents to verify implementation of quality assurance program commitments and to satisfy the intent of the objectives section.
These documents are as follows:
(1) Classification Criteria for Structures, Systems and Components CC-ME-01-88, Revision 5, Byron /Braidwood Units 1 and 2.
(2) Structural Department Orawing List, Clinton 1, January 1981.
(3) 526-1000-01A, Auxiliary Building Basement Floor Plan El.
707'-6", Revision R.
(4) 526-1001-01A, Auxiliary Building Ground Floor Framing Plan El. 737'-0", Revision M.
(5) 523-1902, Fuel Building Fuel Pool Bottom Plan, Rev. N.
(6) S28-1908, Fuel Building Liner Section and Detail, Sheet 6, Revision P.
(7) 529-1000-01A, Diesel Generator & HVAC Buildings Basement Floor Plan El. 702'-0", Revision H.
(8) 526-1000-02C, Auxiliary Building Interm.
F1. Framing Plan El. 727'-0", Revision F.
(9) S30-1001-01A, Control Building Ground F1. Framing Pl. El.
737'-0", Revision N.
(10) S30-1001-03A-E, Control Building Ground Floor Embed.
Plan El. 737'-0", Revision H.
(11) M03-1113-01, Mechanical Penetration Schedule Circulating Water Screen House, Revision J.
(12) M05-1040-07, P&IO Instrument Air, Revision A.
(13) M05-1046-03, P&ID Aux. Bldg. Orain System, Revision S.
(14) M06-1075-02, Residual Heat Removal Piping, Revision N.
(15) M06-1075-19, Residual Heat Removal Piping, Revision N.
(16) Mechanical Department Orawing List for Clinton Units 1 & 2, 02 Jan. 81.
(17). E26-1002-04A-CP2, Cable Tray - Auxiliary Bldg. Plan -
Mezz. Fir. El. 762'-0", Revision C.
(18) E26-1400-CP, Cable Tray - Auxiliary Bldg. Riser Sections, Part 1, Revision C.
i me=-*.-
6 (19) E28-1101-048-LP, Cable Tray Fuel Bldg., Sect. 23-28, Area 5 Upper, Revision C.
(20) E30-1000-06BEIT1, Conduit Hangers Control Building Category 1 Conduit Support Schedule E1. 719'-0", Revision F.
(21) Ele:trical Department Drawing List for Clinton Units 1 & 2, 14 Jan. 81.
(22) M3393-06, Instrument Line Supports Typical Support &
Connection Details, Units 1 & 2, Revision A.
(23) M1320-04, Auxiliary Bldg. HVAC Equipment Rm. Typical Plan, Units 1 & 2, Revision A.
(24) DC-06-01-88, Design Criteria for Off Gas System -
Hydrogen Recombiners, Revision 3.
(25) DC-ST-03-98, Structural Project Design Criteria Revision 7.
(26) DC-AF-01-B8, Design Criteria for Auxiliary Feedwater Systems, Revision 7.
(27) DC-EE-01-BB, Design Criteria for Cable Separation, Revision 7.
(28) Design Criteria Status Report dated 12/10/80.
(29) Mechanical Department Orawing List for Byron /Braidwood Units 1 & 2, dated 1/1/81.
(30) M2535A, Sht. 11, Containment Spray Aux. Bldg. El. 346'-0",
Revision A.
(31) M2538A-04, Residual Heat Containment Bldg. El. 377'-0",
Revision C.
(32) M2616A-02, Nitrogen Syst. Au1. 91dg. El. 412'-0",
Revision A.
(33) Structural Department Orawing List for Byron /Braidwood Units 1 & 2, dated 12/30/80.
(34) List of Support Elements for Byron /Braidwood Units 1 & 2, dated 1/5/81.
(35) Ccmponent Support Assemblies 1CC310095, Revision A, 1C5050075, Revision C, 2AF08017X, Revision B, IBR16010X, Revision A and 1RH09028R, Revision A.
I w.
7 (36) Calculation #E-1311 serial no. 2997?AJJJ, cales for Class 1, Conduit Supports Byron 1 & 2.
(37) Calculation #8.2.1 serial no. 08778CHEA, Airc. aft Crash Probability Analysis.
(38) Calculation #4391/19AI-19 serial no. 05380FHHB, Revision 1, Calculations for Electrical Heat Oissipation in Miscel-laneous Auxiliary and Radwaste Bldg. Areas.
3.
Sindings a.
Nonconformances See Notice of honconformance Enclosure, items A & B.
b.
Unresolved & Followup Items t
None.
E.
Exit Meeting A meeting was conducted with management representatives at the conclusion of the inspection on January 23, 1981.
In addition to the individuals indicated by an asterisk in the Details Section, those in attendance were:
L. E. Ackraann, Director of Servi es W. A. Chittenden, Director of Lig1neering W. G. Hegener, Manager Mechanical Department G. C. Kuhlman, Jr. Project Director J. C. LaVallee, Project Manager D. E. Mccifntock, Manager Electrical Department J. E. McFarland, Head, Quality Assurance Division J. M. McLaughlin, Manager 3tructural Department H. M. Sroka, Project Director The inspector summarized the scope c..d f#ndings of the inspection for those present at the meeting.
Management representatives acknowledged the statements of the inspector.
s
8 DETAILS SECTION II (Prepared by D. O. Chamberlain)
A.
Persons Contacted W. D. Crumpacker, Control and Instrumentation Engineer R. W. Evans, Mechanical Engineer N. R. Galla, Electrical Project Engineer "A.
P. Gillis, Administrative Assistant "R. C. Heider, Project Manager P. A. Nevins, Senior Electrical Project Engineer J. S. Paniaguas, Electrical Engineer R. Rabin, Senior QA Coordinator G. D. Schmalz, Mechanical Engineer D. K. Schopfer, Mechanical Project Engineer A. J. Skale, QA Coordinator
- Denotes those present at exit meeting.
B.
Desion Incuts 1.
Objectives The objectives of this area of the inspection were to determine that:
Procedures have been established and are being implemented a.
that prescribe the system for control of those criteria, para-meters, bases, or other design requirements upon which detailed final design is based.
b.
Design inputs are specified on a timely basis, their selection reviewed and approved, incorporated into the design documents, and changes in input are justified, reviewed, and approved.
c.
Connitments are properly translated into design inputs, as applicable to the following:
(1) Basic Functions (2) Performance requirements (3) Regulatory requirements, codes, and standards (4) Design cenditions (5). Loads (6)
Environmental conditions.
I i
.y%--
-e
- - - - - - =
e--e+
9 d.
Design requirements are specified, when applicable, relating to interfaces, materials, mechanical, structural, hydraulic, chemistry, electrical, instrumentation and control, redundancy, accessibility, fire protection, and other requirements that prevent undue risk to the health and safety of the public.
2.
Method of Accomolishment The preceding objectives were accomplished by an examination of:
a.
Sargent and Lundy Quality Assurance Program Topical Report SL-TR-1A, Revision S.
b.
Sargent and Lundy General Quality Assurance Procedures:
GQ-3.02, Revision 3, GQ-3.03, Revision 4, GQ-3.04, Revision S, GQ-3.06, Revision 1, GQ-3.07 Revision 4, GQ-3.08, Revision 4, GQ-3.12, Revision 3, and GQ-3.16 Revision 0.
c.
51-3021, Revision 6, Project Scope of Work Nuclear Safety Related - Clinton Power Station - Units 1 & 2.
d.
Clinton Power Station Classification Criteria, Revision 6.
e.
Clinton Power Station Design Criteria documents:
(1) DC-AP-01-CP, Revision 1, Design Criteria for Auxiliary Power System (Class 1E A.C. portion)
(2) OC-CC-01-CP, Revision 3, Design Criteria for Component Cooling Water System.
(3) DC-0C-01-CP, Revision 3, Design Criteria for Auxiliary Power system (Class 1E D.C. portion)
(4) DC-00-01-CP Revision 2, Design Criteria for Diesel Fuel Oil Storage and Transfer System.
(5) DC-ME-16-CP Revision 0, Design Criteria for Design Verification of Structures and Components in Category I Buildings.
(6) DC-RM-01-CP, Revision 0, Design Criteria for Radiation Monitoring System.
l (7) DC-SX-01-CP, Revision 3, Design Criteria for Shutdown Service Water System.
(8) DC-VD-01-CP, Revision 3, Design Criteria for Diesel Gener-ator Room Ventilation.
(9) DC-VG-01-CP, Revision 4, Design Criteria for Standby Gas Treatment System.
5 r-
10 f.
MAS-3, Revision A, Mechanical Department Standard, Instructions for Technical Review of Procurement Specifications, g.
Clinton Power Station Sargent & Lundy drawings:
(1) E02-1AP99, Revision 0, 4160V, Electrical Bre aker Control Schematic (2) M05-1032 Sheet 3, Piping ar.d Instrument Otagram for Component Cooling Water System t
(3) E02-1D099, Sheet 2, Schematic Diagram for Diesel Fuel Oil System, Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Transfer Pump 1B (4) M15-1036, Sheet 1, Logic Diagram for Diesel Fuel Oil System.
(5) M05-1036, Sheets 1 & 2, Piping and Instrument Diagram for Diesel Generator Fuel Oil System (D0).
h.
Clinton Power Station design calculations:
(1) 01001, Revision 1, Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tank Sizing (2) 01D02, Revision 0, Diesel Fuel Oil Day Tank Sizing (3) 01D03, Revision 0, Line Sizing for Fuel Oil System i.
Clinton Power Station Design Criteria Status Report for period ending 12-15-80.
j.
Clinton Power Station procurement specifications:
(1) K-2826A, Misc. Pumps Specification (2) K-2828A, Shutdown Service Water Pumos Specification
(?;) K-2861, Diesel Generator Specification (4) X-2866, Valve Specification.
k.
Clinton Power Station PSAR/FSAR.
3.
Findings a.
In this area of the inspection, one (1) nonconformance was identified (See Notice of Nonconformance Enclosure, Item C).
Relative to Item C. in the Notice of Nonconformance, the inspector reviewed the procurement specificatio, (K-2866) for valve MO-1CC050, and it was determined that the valve was pro-perly specified as " Class 1E" in the procurement specification.
s
)
1
-..i
r
~
r l.
11 A review was not made by the inspector of other design documents and/or specifications relative to all of the affected motor operated valves.
b.
Examination of other design / design input documents did not develope any additional comments.
I 6
.w
- -****w wee =*"*
- N*
- D*
- ~ ~ '
" ~
----- 2