ML19350A543
| ML19350A543 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 02/25/1981 |
| From: | Novak T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Bauer E PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8103160458 | |
| Download: ML19350A543 (30) | |
Text
.
FERUARY ^ 51091
/
DISTRIBUTIOl:
ORC #4 TNovai I.Di ggs "ccket File-2 IIDenton RReid AE00 l# PDR 4
DEisenf9;t Merrelli Sc ty Fi l e +4 -+
1 4
-L PDR Vurple Ringraa
!Eilli es TERA-2 RTedesco ECase NSIC Glainas C ELO IE-3 Dockets Nos. 50-277 and 50-278 ACPS-16 BJones-C HISHUI p [, y a y c\\
~,4/
CMiles g
%4 Mr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr.
SECY G
t
- h.2,.Q'(O.g Vice President and General Counsel h(y Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street c
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 (o
mQE'
.qsjtc
Dear Mr. Bauer:
SUBJECT:
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT RE: PEACH BOTTOM UNITS NOS. 2 AND 3
Reference:
Order for Modification of License Concerning the Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment, October 24, 1980.
This letter transmits the preliminary results of our review of environmental qualifications of safety-related electrical equipment at your facilities.
This evaluation was based on your submittals received over the past months.
The facilities' licenses were modified by the referenced Order of October 24, 1980, to require that all safety-related electrical equipment be qualified to l
specified requirements not later than June 30, 1982.
In addition, the Order i
noted that a licensee is obligated to modify or replace inadequate equipment promptly.
The staff's review of your submittals has resulted in our identifying a l
number of potential equipment deficiencies involving a lack of proper documentation, inadequate justification of assumed environmental conditions following an accident, and/or inadequate environmental testing of equipment, l
such that conformance to the 00R guidelines, as required by the Order, l
cannot be demonstrated. You are requested to review our identified deft-ciencies, and their ramifications, and provide us your overal' finding regarding continued safe operation of your facilities. Accordingly, in order to determine whether your licenses should be modified or suspended, you are i
required pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f), to provide within 10 days of receipt of this letter, a written statement, sigrad under oath or affirmation sup-porting the safe operation cf your facilities, that takes into account the NRC staff's preliminary 11.st of deficiencies.
8"I 0 3 1 6 0 W P
5 5
i U
5
$ The purpose of this statement is to provide the NRC with needed assurance, by the licensee, regarding the continued safety of the facility until you can provide an item-by-item reevaluation in a detailed documented manner at a later date. A negative finding on your par) concerning the safety of continued operation would result in a unit shutdown, and should be reported as a Licensee Event Report (LER) within twenty-four (24) hours of the deter-mination to the appropriate NRC Regional Office.
Include in the LER the actions you have taken for the immediate resolution of the matter. A copy cf any such LER should be sent to the Director, Division of Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
Please submit a copy of your reply to us via telecopy.
Sincerely, Original signed by Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Evaluation Reports cc w/ enclosure:
See next page I
/'!
y.
y, f./
..l W (.
1 A'-
L fit
/
\\y e 8.,.
V
.6 s u
~
ff,,
./. l l /. /
,? / 4^.. ' '
y Q
f
..Q<
/9 # 3//
V /p.$.c' 5RB(4;DL...05f hY AMRbL
- " :: >, OEB_d4 : DL.
DVerrelii CMeid fhlil i. as,
Tflovik
- ms 2/ /81:cb 2/'^/81
'2 / /81
. 2M.. /81
-+=+== mins
--we'h N w 4'
- p# H%g UNITED STATES o
['>
'h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHWGTON. D. C. 20555 p#
February 25, 1981 Dockets Nos. 50-277 and 50-278 Pr. Edward G. Bauer, Jr.
Vice President and General Counsel Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101
Dear Mr. Bauer:
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATI0H OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUI
SUBJECT:
RE: PEACH BOTTOM UNITS NOS. 2 AND 3 Order for Modification of License Concerning the Environmental
Reference:
Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment, October 24, 1980.
This letter transmits the preliminary results of our review of environmental qualifications of safety-related electrical equipment at your facilities.
This evaluation was based on your submittals received over the past months.
The facilities' licenses were modifi.ed by the referenced Order of October 24, 1980, to require that all safety-related electrical equipment be qualified to 30, 1982.
In addition, the Order speciff ed requirements not later than June noted that a licensee is obligated to modify or replace inadequate equipment promptly.
The staff's review of your submittals has result?d in our identifying a number of potential equipment deficiencies involving a lack of proper documentation, inadeouate justification of assumed environmental conditions following an accident, and/or inadequate environmental testing of equipment, such that conformance to the DOR guidelines, as required by the Order, You are requested to review our identified deff-cannot be denonstrated.
ciencies, and their ramifications, and provide us your overall finding Accordingly, in order regarding continued safe operation of your facilities.
to determine whether your licenses should be modified or suspended, you are required pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f), to provide within 10 days of receipt of this letter, a written statement, signed under oath or affirmation sup-porting the safe operation of your facilities, that takes into account the NRC staff's preliminary list of deficiencies.
. The purpose of this statement is to provide the NRC with needed assurance, by the licensee, regarding the continued safety of the facility until you can provide an item-by-item reevaluation in a detailed documented manner at a later date. A negative finding on your part concerning the safety of continued operation would result in a unit shutdown, and should be reported as a Licensee Event Report (LER) within twenty-four (24) hours of the deter-mination to the appropriate NRC Regional Office.
Include in the LER the actions you have taken for the immediate resolution of the matter. A copy of any such LER should be sent to the Director, Division of Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
please submit a copy of your reply to us via telecopy.
Sincerely, Thom)as M. Novak, Assistant Director 27 s
for Operating Reactors Division of Licensing
Enclosure:
Evaluation Reports cc w/2nclosure:
See rext page w--w w
w
Philadelphia Electric Company ccw/ enclosure (s):
Eugene J. Bradley U. S. Environmenta' Protection Agency Philadelphia Electric Company Region III Office Assistant General Counsel ATTN: EIS COORDINATOR 2301 Market Street Curtis Building (Sixth Floor)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 6th and Walnut Streets Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 Troy B. Conner, Jr.
1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
M. J. Cooney, Superintendent Washington, D. C.
20006 Generation Division - Nuclear Philadelphia Electric Company Raymond L. Hovis, Esq.
2301 Market Street 35 South Duke Street Pniladelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 York, Pennsylvania 17401 Government Publications Section Warren K. Rich, Esq.
State Library of Pennsylvania Assistant Attorney General Education Building Department of Natural Resources Commonwealth and Walnut Streets Annapolis, Maryland 21401 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 1717s Philadelphia Electric Company ATTN: Mr. W. T. Ullrich Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Mr. R. A. Heiss, Coordinator Delta, Pennsylvania 17314 Pennsylvania State Clearinghouse Governor's Office of State Planning Albert R. Steel, Chairman and Development Board of Supervisors P. O. Box 1323 Peach Bottom Township Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 R. D. #1 Delta, Pennsylvania 17314 Curt Cowgill l
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement.
Peach Bottom Atomic Power. Station P. O. Box 399 l
Delta, Pennsylvania 17314 I
Director, Criteria and Standards Division Office of Radiation Prograns (ANR-460)
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D. C.
20460 i
l
PARTIAL REVIEW EQUIPMENT EVALUATION REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION J
FOR PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM UNIT 2 DOCKET NO. 50-277 3 STAFF EQUIPMENT EVALUATION The staff evaluation of the licensee's responras included an onsite inspection of selected Class IE equipment and an examination of the licensee's report for completeness and acceptability.
The criteria described in the 00R guidelines and in NUREG-0588, in part, were used as a basis for the staff evaluation of
~ the adequacy of the licensee's qualification program.
The NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement performed (1) a preliminary evaluation of the licensee's response, documented in a Technical Evaluation Report (TER) and (2) an onsite verification inspection (June 4-5, 1980) of selected safety-related electrical equipment.
The main steam and feedwater system was inspected at Peach Bottom Unit 2 to verify proper installation of equipment, overall interface integrity, and manufacturers' nameplate' data.
The manufacturer's name and model number from the nameplate data were compared to information given in the Component Evaluation Work Sheets (CES) of the licensee's report. The site inspection is documented in report IE 50-277/80-17.
No deficiencies were noted.
For this review, the documents referenced above have been factored into the overall staff evaluation.
3.1 Completeness of Safety-Related Equipment In accordance with IEB 79-01B, the licensee was directed to (1) establish a list of systems and equipment that are required to mitigate a LOCA and an HEL8 and (2) identify components needed to perform the function of safety-related display information, post-accident sampling and monitoring, and radiation monitrring.
The staff developed a generic master list based upon a review of plant safety analyses and emergency procedures. The instrumen?.ation selected includes parameters to monitor overall plant performance as well as to monitor the per-formance of the systems on the list.
The systems list was established on the basis of the functions that must be performed for accident mitigation (without regard to location of equipment relative to hostile environments).
l The list of safety-related systems provided by the licensee was reviewed against the staff-developed master list.
Based upon information in the licensee's submittal, the equipment location references, and in some cases subsequent conversations with the licensee, the staff has verified and determined that the systems included in the licensee's l
submittal are those required to achieve or support:
(1) emergency reactor shutdown, (2) containment isolation, (3) reactor coce cooling, (4) containment heat removal, (5) core residual heat removal, and (6) prevention of significant release of radioactive material to the environment.
The staff therefore l
l
concludes that the systems identified by the licensee (listed in Appendix 0) are acceptable, with the exception of those items discussed in Section 5 of l
this report.
Display instrumentation which provided information for the reactor operators to aid them in the safe handling of the plant was not specifically identified by the licensee.
A complete list of all display instrumentation mentioned in the LOCA and HELB emergency procedures must be provided.
Equipment qualification information in the form of summary sheets should be provided for all components of the display instrumentation exposed to harsh environments.
Instrumentation which is not considered to be safety related, but which is mentioned in the emergency procedure should appear on the list.
For these instruments, (1) justi-fication should be provided for not considering the instrument safety related, and (2) assurance should be provided that its subsequent / failure will not mis-lead the operator or adversely effect the mitigation of the consequences of the accident. The environmental qualification of post-accident sampling and minitoring and radiation monitoring equipment is closely related to the review of the TMI Lessons-Learned modifications and will be perfermed in conjunction with that review.
The licensee identified 569 items of equipment which were assessed by the staff.
3.2 Service Conditions Commission Maeorande:n and Order CLI-80-21 requires that the 00R guidelines and the "For Comment" NUREG-0588 are to be used as the criteria for establishing the adequacy of the safety-related electrical equipment environmental qualifi-cation program.
These documents provide the option of establishing a bounding pressure and temperature condition based on plant-specific analysis identified in the licensee's Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) or based on generic profiles using the methods identified in these documents.
On this basis, the staff has assumed, unless otherwise noted, that the analysis for developing the environmental envelopes for Peach Bottom Unit 2, relative to the temperature and pressure has been performed in accordance,with the requirements stated above. The staff has reviewed the CES to ensure that the qualification data envelope the specifications established by the licensee.
During this review, the staff assumed that for plants designed and equipped with-an automatic containment spray system which satisfies the single-failure criterion, the main-steam-line-break (MSLB) environmental conditions are enveloped by the large-break-LOCA environmental conditions.
The staff assumed, l
and requires the licensee to verify, that the containment spray system is not l
subjected to a disabling single-component failure and therefore satisfies the requirements of Section 4.2.1 of the 00R guidelines.
Equipment submergence has also been addressed where the possibility exists that flooding of equipment may result from HELBs. _
3.3 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Inside Containment The licensee has provided the results of accident analyses as follows:
Max Temp ( F)
Max Press (osig)
Humidity (%)
LOCA 297 49 100 MSLB (not provided)
(not provided)
(not provided)
The staff has concluded that the minimum tenperature profile for equipment qualification purposes should include a margin to account for analytical uncertainties in the calculated temperature profiles for postulated accidents.
A margin of 20*F above saturation is considerd to be appropriate for either a postulated LOCA or MSLB, whichever is controlling, as to potential adverse environmental effects on equipment.
The licensee's specified temperature (service condition) of 297 F does not satsify the above requirement.
The licensee should update his equipment summary tables to a temperature margin of at least 20 F above saturation.
If there is any equipment that does not meet the staff position, the licensee must provide either justification that the equipment will perform its intended function under the specified. conditions or propose corrective action.
3.4 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Outside Containment The licensee has provided the temperature, pressure, humidity and applicable environment associated with an HELS outside containment.
The following areas outside containment have been addressed:
Room Descriotion (1) 2, 3, 4, 5, 101, 102, 103, 104 RHR pumps (2) 6 HPCI pumps (3) 7 RCIC pumps (4) 8 Reactor sump pump (5) 9, 10, 11, 12 Core spray pumps (6) 33 SGT room (7) 105 Cooling water equipment room (8) 107, 108 Vacuum breaker area (9) 201 Control rod drive (10) 203, 204 Isolation valve room
~
(11) 205 CRD equipment area (12) 207 Drywell access (13) 208 Steam tunnel (14) 209 Corridor (15) 210 Neutron monitoring room (16) 212 CR0 equipment area (17) 220, 221 Feedwater heater room (18) 223 Piping area (19) 400 Isolation valve rocm (20) 403 Operating area (21) 40A, 405 RWCU pump room (22) 407 RWCU regenerative heat exchanger -
1 (2's) 408, 409 RWCU nonregenerative heat exchanger (21) 410 Transfer pump room (25) 430 Backwash receiving pump room (26) 500 Holding pump compartments (27) 501 Laydown area (29) 502 New fuel storage (29) 504 Source storage 'nd calibration (30) 505 Holding pump con stment (31) 506 Reactor building vent equipment area (32) 507 Steam separator and Jryer storage pit (33) 508 Laydown area (34) 509 Filter demineralizer compartments (35) 510, 511 Prefilter and HEPA compartments (36) 529 Ventilating equipment area (37) 601, 603 Laydown area (38) 604 Washdown area The staff has verified that the parameters identified by the licensee for the MSLB are acceptable.
3.5 Submergence The maximum submergence levels have been established and assessed by the licensee. Unless otherwise noted, the staff assumed for this review that the methodology employed by the licensee is in accordance with the appropriate criteria as established by Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21.
The licensee's value for maximum submergence is the 123 ft elevation.
No equipment has been identified as being below this level.
3.6 Chemical Spray The licensee stated that no chemical solutions are used in systems required for the accidents under consideration.
3.7 Aging Section 7 of the 00R guidelines does not require a qualified life to be estab-lished for all safety-related electrical equipment.
However, the following actions are require.1:
(1) Make a detailed comparison of existing equipment and the materials identified in Appendix C of the 00R guidelines.
The first supplement to IEB-79-018 requires licensees to utilize the table in Appendix C and identify any additional materials as the result of their effort.
(2) Establish an ongoing program to review surveillance and maintenance records to identify potential age-related degradations.
(3) Establish component maintenance and replacement schedules which include considerations of aging characteristics of the installed components..-
The licensee indentified a number of components for which a specified qualified life was established (for exainples, 5 years, 15 years, or 40 years). In its assessment of this submittal, the staff did not review the adequacy of the methodology nor the basis used to arrive at these values; the staff has assumed that the established values are based on state-of-the-art technology and are acceptable.
For this review, however, the staff requires that the licensee submit supple-mental information to identify and verify the degree of conformance to the above requirements.
The response should include all the equipment identified as required to maintain functional operability in harsh environments.
The licensee indicated that this phase of their response is outstanding and that the review is in progress. The staff will review the licensee's response when it is submitted and discuss its evaluation in a supplemental report.
3.8 Radiation (Inside and Outside Containment)
The licensee has provided values for the radiation levels postulated to exist following a LOCA.
An acceptable methodology that may be employed to determine these values were presented to the licensee as part of the NRC staff criteria contained in the DOR guidelines, in NUREG-0588, and in the guidance provided in IEB-79-01B, Supplement 2.
Therefore, for this review, the staff has assumed that, unless otherwise noted, the values provided have been determined in accordance with the prescribed criteria.
The staff review determined that the values to which equipment was qualified enveloped the requirements identified by the licensee.
The value required by the licensee inside containment is between 2.64 x 108 to 6.24 x 10? rads for the integrated dose.
These values do not envelope the D0R guideline requirements (4 x 10?) and therefore are not acceptable.
The radia-tion service condition provided by the licensee is lower than provided in the guidelines for gamma and beta radiation.
The licensee is requested to either provide justification for using the lower service condition or use the guide-lines for both gamma and beta radiation.
If the former option is chosen, then the analysis, including the basis and assumptions used in the analysis and a sample calculation, should be provided.
A required value outside of containment of 9.6 x 108 to 3.35 x 10? rads has been used by the licensee to specify limiting radiation levels in the RHR pump These values appear to consider the radiation levels influenced by the
~
room.
source term methodology associated with post-LOCA recirculation fluid lines and are, therefore, acceptable.
4 QUALIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT l
The following subsections present the staff's assessment, based on the licensee's l
submittal, of the qualification status of safety-related electrical equipment.
The staff has separated the safety-related equipment into three categories:
(1) equipment requiring immediate corrective action, (2) equipment requiring additional qualification information and/or corrective action, and (3) equipment considered acceptable if the staff's concern identified in Section 3.7 is satisfactorily resolved.
In its assessment of the licensee's submittal, the NRC staff did not review the methodology employed to determine the values established by the licensee.
However, in reviewing the data sheets, the staff made a determination as to the stated conditions presented by the licensee.
Additionally, the staff has not completed its review of supporting documentation referenced by the licensee (for example, test reports).
It is expected that when the review of test reports is complete, the environmental qualification data bank established by the staff will provide the means to cross reference each supporting document to the referencing licensee.
If supporting documents are found to be unacceptable, the licensee will be required to take additional corrective actions to either establish qualification or replace the item (s) of concern.
This effort will begin in early 1981.
An appendix for each subsection of this report provides a list of equipment for which additional information and/or corrective action is required. Where appropriate, a reference is provided in the appendices to identify deficiencies.
It should be noted, as in the Commission Memorandum and Order, that the deficien-cies identified do not necessarily mean that equipment is unqualified.
- However, they are cause for concern and may require further case-by-case evaluation.
4.1 Equipment Requiring Immediate Corrective Action i
4.2 Equipment Reouiring Additional Information and/or Corrective Action Appendix B identifies equipment in this category, including a tabulation of deficiencies. The deficiencies are noted by a letter relating to the legend (identified below), indicating that the information provided is not sufficient for the qualification parameter or condition.
Legend R
- radiation T
- temperature QT qualification time RT - required time P
pressure H
- humidity CS - chemical spray A
- material-aging evaluation; replacement schedule; ongoing equipment surveillance S
- submergence o
M
- margin I
- HELB evaluation outside containment not completed QM qualification mathod RPN - equipment relocation or replacement; adequate schedule not provided EXN - exempted equipment justification inadequate SEN - separate-effects qualification justification inadequate QI qualification information being developed RPS - equipment relocation or replacement schedule provided As noted in Section 4, these deficiencies do not necessarily mean that the equipment is unqualified.
However, the deficiencies are cav=e for concern and
~
require further case-by-case evaluation.
The staff has de
'ned that an acceptable basis to exempt equipment from qualification, it, e or part, can be established provided the following can be established ant
_rified by the licensee:
(1) Equipment does not perform essential safety functions in the harsh environ-ment, and equipment failure in the harsh environment will not impact safety-related functions or mislead an operator.
(2a) Equipment performs its function before its exposure to the harsh environ-ment, and the adequacy for the time margin provided is adequately justified, and (2b) Subsequent failure of the equipment as a result of the harsh environment does not degrade other safety functions or mislead the operator.
(3) The safety-related function can be accomplished by some other designated equipment that i.as been adequately qualified and satisfies the single-failure criterion.
(4) Equipment will not be subjected to a harsh environment as a result of the postulated accident.
The licensee is, therefore, required to supplement the information presented by providing resolutions to the deficiencies identified; these resolutions should include a description of the corrective action, schedules'for its completion (as applicable), and so forth. The staff will review the licensee's response, when it is submitted, and discuss the resolution in a supplemental report.
It should be noted that in cases where testing is being conducted, a condition may arise which results in a determination by the licensee that the equipment does not satisfy the qualification test requirements.
For that equipment, the licensee will be required to provide the proposed corrective action, on a timely basis, to ensure that qualification can be established by June 30, 1982.
4.3 Equipment Considered Acceptable or Conditionally Acceptable Based on the staff review of the licensee's submittal, the staff identified the equipment in Appendix C as (1) acceptable on the basis that the qualifi-cation program adequately enveloped the specific environmental plant parameters, 7
l F
or (2) conditionally acceptable subject to the satisfactory resolution of the staff concern identified in Section 3.7.
For the equipment identified as conditionally acceptable, the staff determined that the licensee did not clearly (1) state that an equipment material evaluation was conducted to ensure that no known materials susceptible to degradation because of aging have been
- used, (2) establish an ongoing program to review the plant surveillance and main-tenance records in orde',* to identify equipment degradation which may be age related, and/or (3) propose a maintenance program and replacement schedule for equipment identified in item 1 or equipment that is qualified for less than the life of the plant.
The licensee is, therefore, required to supplement the information presented for equipment in tnis category before full acceptance of this equipment can be established.
The staff will review the licensee's response when it is sub-mitted and discuss the resolution in a supplemental report.
5 DEFERRED REQUIREMENTS IEB 79-018, Supplement 3 has relaxed the time constraints for the submission of the information associated with cold shutdown equipment and TMI lessons-learned modifications.
The staff has required that this information be provided by February 1, 1981.
The staff will provide a supplemental safety evaluation addressing these concerns.
e.
e APPENDIX B Equipment Requiring Additional Information and/or Corrective Action (Category 4.2)
LEGEND:
R - Radiation T - Temperature QT - Qualification time RT - Required time P - Pressure H - Humidity CS - Chemical spray A - Material aging evaluation, replacement schedule, ongoing equipment surveillance S - Submergence M - Margin I - HELB evaluation outside containment not completed QM - Qualification method RPN - Equipment relocation or replacement, adequate schedule not provided EXN - Exempted equipment justification inadequate SEN - Separate effects qualification justification incdequate QI - Qualification information being developed RPS - Equipment relocation or replacement schedule provided Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-116A,8 T,P,A Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-116C,0 T,P,A Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-117A,8 T,P,A Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-117C,0 T,P,A Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-118A,8 T,P,A Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-118C,0 T,P,A Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-119A,8 T,P,A Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-119C,D T,P,A Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-116A,8 T,P,A Transmitter B-1
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-116C,0 T,P,A Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-117A,B T,P,A.
Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-117C,0 T,P,A Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-118A,B T,P,A Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-118C,0 T,P,A Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemour.c DPT-2-119A,B T,P,A Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-119C,0 T,P,A Transmitter Position Limit Switch Namco POS-02-86A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,H,A Pressure Switch Barksdale PS-2-3-52A R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Barton PS-2-3-52B,0 T,P,H,A Pressure Switch Barksdale PS-2-3-52C R,T,P,A Level Ind. Switch Yarway LIS-2-3-57A,B R,T,P,H,A Level Ind. Switch Yarway LIS-2-3-58A,8 R,T,P,H,A l
l Level Ind. Switch Rosemount LIS-2-3-83A,B T,QT,P,A l
Level Ind. Switch Rosemount LIS-2-3-99A,B,C,0 T,P,A Level Ind. Switch Rosemount LIS-2-3-101A,B,C,D T,P,A
~
Level Ind. Switch Rosemount LISH-2-3-72A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,A l
Level Switch Rosemount LSL-2-3-72A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,A 1
Level Switch Rosemount LSLL-2-3-72A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,A Level Transmitter Rosemount LT-2-3-72A,B,C,D T,P,A l
B-2
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Level Transmitter Rosemount LT-2-3-83A,B T,P,A Level T ansmitter Rosemount LT-2-3-99A,B,C,0 T,P,A Level Transmitter Rosemount LT-2-3-101A,B,C,0 T,P,A Pilot Solenoid Valve Automatic RV-02-71A,B,C,G,K QT,T,P,A Valve Corp.
Pilot Solenoid Valve Automatic RV-02-710,E,F,H,J,L QT,T,P,A Valve Corp.
Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-2-38A,B QT,T,P,A
'/alve Actuator Limitorque M0-02-53A,B QT,T,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-02-74 QT,T,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-2-77 QT,T,P,H,A Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-02-39 T,P,A Air Manifold Pilot Valve Automatic A0-02-80A,B,C,0 QT,T,P,A Valve Corp.
Air Manifold Automatic A0-02-86A,B,C,D QT,T,P,A,H Valve Corp.
Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-02-316 T,P,A Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-02-317 T,P,A Inverter Topaz INV02-3-402-A,B R,A,H Power Supply Elma E/S-02-3-402A,8 R,QT,A,H Position Limit Switch Namco P05-02-80A,B,C,D T,QT,P,A,H Auxiliary Relay Agastat 5A-K25A,B,C,0 T,P,A,H l
Auxiliary Relay Agastat 5A-K26A,B,C,D T,P,A,H Auxiliary Relay Agastat 5A-K28A,B,C,0 T,P,A,H t
Auxiliary Relay Agastat 5A-K29A,B,C,D T,P,A,H Auxiliary Relay Agastat 5A-K30A,B,C,0 T,P,A,H l
B-3 l
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Auxiliary Relay Agastat 5A-K31A,B,C,D T,P,A,H Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-5-12A,B R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-5-12C,D R,T,P,A Solenoid Valve GEC0/ASCO SV-3-13-118 T,P,QT,A,M Solenoid Valve GECO SV-3-13-117 T,P,QT,A,M Differential Pressure Barton DPIS-23-76,23-77 7,P,A,H Indicator Switch Pressure Switch Barksdale PS-23-68A,B,C,0 R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-23-97A,8 R,T,P,A
?ressure Switch-
. Static-0-Ring PS-23-84-1 R,T,P,A Flow Switch Barton FS-23-78 R,T,P,A Flow Transmitter GEC0 FT-23-82 R,T,QT,P,H,A Level Switch Robert Shaw LS-23-91A&8 R T,P,A HFCI Pump / Turbine GECO MPL23-1&2 R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-14 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-2-23-15 T,P,QT,A l
Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-16 T,P,QT,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-23-17 T,QT,P,A l
Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-19 T,QT,P,A l
~
Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-23-20 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-21 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-23-24 T,QT,P,A l
l Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-23-25 R,T,QT,P,H,A I
l Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-23-31 T,QT,P,A B-4 l
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-58 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-4245 T,QT,P,H,A Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-23-42 T,P,A Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-23-43 T,P,A Auxiliary Relay Agastat 10A-K150C,0 P,T,A,H Asxiliary Relay Agastat 10-K150E,F,G,H T,P,H,A Auxiliary Relay Agastat 10A-K150J,K,L,M T,P,A,H Differential Pressure Barton DPIS-10-121A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Indicator Nitch Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-10-100A,B,C,D R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-10-101A,B,C,0 R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-10-120A,C,E,G R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-10-1208,0,F,H R,T,P,A Pump Motor GEC0 2AP35 QT,R,T,P,A,M Pump Motor GEC0 2BP35 QT,R,T,P,A,M Pump Motor GEC0 2CP35 QT,R,T,P,A,M Pump Motor GEC0 20P35 QT,R,T,P,A,M Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-13A,B,C,D R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-15A R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-10-158,C,0 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-10-16A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-17 R,T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M02-10-18 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-25A,8 T,QT,P,A B-5
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-33 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-34A,B R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-38A,B T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-39A,B T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-154A,B R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-174 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-10-176 T,QT,P,A Pressure Transmitter Rosemount PT-10-100A-D T,P,A Pressure Indicator Switch Rosemount PISHH-10-100A-D T,P,A Pressure Switch Rosemount PSH-10-100A-D T,P,,H Auxiliary Relay Agastat 10A-K158A,B,C,0 T,P,H,n Auxiliary Relay Agastat 10A-K159 T,P,H,A Auxiliary Relay Agastat 10A-K160 T,P,H,A Auxiliary Relay Agastat 10A-K161 T,P,H,A Auxiliary Relay Agastat 10A-K162 T,P,H,A Auxiliary Relay Agastat 10A-K158E,F,G,H T,P,H,A Pressure Switch Barton DPIS-14-81A T,P,H,A Differential Pressure Switch Barton DPIS-14-81B,C,0 T,P,A,H Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-14-044A,B,C,0 R,T,P,A Motor GEC0 2AP37 T,P,A Motor GECO 2BP37 T,P,A Motor GEC0 2CP37 T,P,A Motor GEC0 2DP37 T,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-14-005A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,A B-6
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-14-007A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-14-11A,8 R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-14-12A,8 R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-14-26A,8 T,QT,P,A Differential Pressure Switch Dwyer OPS-00014,15 R,T,QT,P,H,A Pneumatic-Electric Switch Johnson PS-00012,13 R,T,QT,P,H,A RPN Heater American 0A&8E65 R,T,QT,P,H,A Air Filter Fan Motor GECO 0A,B,CV20 R,T,QT,P,H,A Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-0009,10,11 T,P,A,M Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-00012,13 T,P,A,M Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-00475-1,2 T,P,A,M Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-00476-1,2 T,P,A,M Solenoid Pilot Valve ASCO SV-20452,53,61,62 T,QT,P,A,M l
Solenoid Pilot Valve ASCO SV-20457,58 T,P,A,M Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-20459,60,63,64, T,P,A,M 67,68 Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-20465 T,P,A,M Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-20466 T,P,A,M Solenoid Pilot Valve ASCO SV-20469-1,2 T,P,A,M Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-20470-1,2 T,P,A,M Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-20479-1,2 T,P,A,M Time Delay Relay Agastat 2-ATDPU T,P,H,A,M Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-4948A,8 T,P,A Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-4949A,8 T,P,A B-7
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-4950A,8 T,P,A Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-4951A,B T,P,A Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-4960A,B,C,0 T,P,A Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-4961A,B,C,0 T,P,A Analyzer Rack Comsip Delphi, A5215 T,RT,P,H,A Inc.
Analyzer Re-k Comsip Delphi, 85215 T,RT,P,H,A Inc.
Analyzer Rack Comsip Delphi, CS215 T,RT,P,H,A Inc.
Analyzer Rack Comsip Delphi, 05215 T,RT,P,H,A Inc.
Temperature Element Burns TE-4931A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Engineering Temperature Element Burns TE-4936A,B,C,D R,T,QT,P,H,A Engineering Temperature Element Burns TE-4937A,B,C,D R,T,QT,P,H,A Engineering Temperature Element Burns TE-4938A,B,C,D R,T,QT,P,H,A Engineering Temperature Element Burns TE-4939A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Engineering Temperature Element Burns TE-4941A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Engineering Temperature Element Burns TE-4942A,B,C,D R,T,QT,P,H,A Engineering Temperature Element Burns TE-4943A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Engineering Temperature Element Burns TE-4944A,B,C,D R,T,QT,P,H,A Engineering Radiation Element GEC0 RE-17-430A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,RT,P,A Ridiation Element GEC0 RE-17-432A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,RT,P,A B-8
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Area Cooler
- Joy, 2EV24, 2FV24 R,T,QT,P,H,A H. K. Porter, Reliance Motor Area Cooler
- Joy, 2GV24, 2HV24 R,T,QT,P,H,A H. K. Porter, Reliance Motor Area Cooler
- Joy, 2AV25, 2BV25 R,T,QT,P,H,A H. K. Porter, Reliance Motor Area Cooler
- Joy, 2CV25, 20V25 R,T,QT,P,H,A H. K. Porter, Reliance Motor Area Cooler
- Joy, 2EV25, 2FV25 R,T,QT,P,H,A H. K. Porter, Reliance Motor Area Cooler
- Joy, 2GV25, 2HV25 R,T,QT,P,H,A i
H. K. Porter, Reliance Motor Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2334A,B T,P,A,M l
Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2335A,B T,P,A,M Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2335C,0 T,P,A,M Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-2335E,F T,P,A,M l
Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2335G,H T,P,A,M Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-2336A,B T,P,A,M Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-2336C,0 T,P,A,M Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2336E,F T,P,A,M Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2336G,H T,P,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GEC0 N-3682, N-3683 T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GEC0 N-3692, N-3693 R,T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GECO N-3772, N-3773 R,T,P,H,A,M B-9 l
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Control Station (Switch)
GEC0 N-3783, N-3784 R,T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GECO N-3792, N-3793 T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GEC0 N-3861, N-3871 T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GECO N-3884, N-3885 R,T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GEC0 N-3991, N-3992 T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GEC0 N-3994, N-3995 R,T,P,H,A,M Differential Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-20400-3,4 R,i,QT,P,H,A Differential Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-20400-5,6 R,T,QT,P,H,A Differential Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-20400-7,8 R,T,QT,P,H,A Differential Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-20400-9,10 R,T,QT,P,H,A Differential Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-20400-11,12 R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-14-70&71 T,QT,P,H,A DPS-20400-13,14 R,T,QT,P,H,A Differential Pressure Switch Dwyer,
Differential Preu ure Switch Dwyer DPS-20400-15,16 R,T,QT,P,H,A Differential Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-20400-17,18 R,T,QT,P,H,A Differential Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-20400-19,20 R,T,QT,P,H,A Area Cooler H. K. Porter, 2AV23, 2BV23 R,T,QT,P,H,A Joy, Reliance Motor Area Cooler H. K. Porter, 2AV24, 2BV24 R,T,QT,P,H,A Joy, Reliance Motor Area Cooler H. K. Porter, 2CV24, 2DV24 R,T,QT,P,H,A Joy, Reliance Motor AC132, BC132, R,T,QT,P,H,A Time Delay Relay (63-0400-3 thru 20)
CC132, DC132 Aux. Relay (63X-system)
GECO AC132, BC132, R,T,P,H,A,M CC132, DC132 B-10
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Differential Pressure Barton DPIS-12-124A,B R,T,P,A Ind. Switch Differential Pressure Barton DPIS-13-83,84 T,P,A,H Ind. Switch Valve Actuator Limitorque M02-12-15 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-12-18 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-12-68 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M02-13-15 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-13-16 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-13-27 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-13-30 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-13-41 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-2200A,8 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-2201A,B T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-4244 R,T,QT,RT,P,H,A Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2505 T,P,A,M Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-2506 T,P,A,M I
Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2507 T,P,A,M Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-2509 T,P,A,M Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-2510 T,P,A,M
~
Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2511 T,P,A,M Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-2512 T,P,A,M Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2513,14 T,P,A,M Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2519 T,P,A,M Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-2520 T,P,A,M 1
B-11 l
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-2521A,8 T,P,A,M Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-2523 T,P,A,M Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-2968 T,P,A,M Air-0perated Valve ASCO A0-2969A,B T,P,A,M Plug Connectors Pyle National Model No.
T,QT,P,A P-A-207499 P&R thru P-A-207503 P&R Air-Operated Valve ASCO A0-4235 T,P,A,M Air-0perated Valve Atkomatic SV-2671A,8,C,0,E,F R,T,QT,P,H,A,RPN Solenoid Valve Atkomatic SV-2671G T,QT,P,A,RPN Solenoid Valve Atkomatic SV-2978A,8,C,0,E,F,G T,QT,P,H,A,RPN Solenoid Valve Atkomatic SV-2980 T,QT,P,A,RPN Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-20-82,83,94,95 T,P,A,M Lot Voltage Power and GEC0 2N105A,B,C,D, A,M Control Penetration 2N106A,8,C,0 High Voltage Penetration Physical N101A,8,C,0,E,F A,M Science Load Center ITE 20810,11,12,13 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer 20836 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer 20837 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer 20838 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamar 20839 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer 20011 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer 20011A R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer N210025A R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer N2100258 R,T,QT,P,H,A B-12
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Cable Rockbestos Model No.
T,QT,P,A Firewall III Cable Rockbestos Model No. Pyrotrol T,QT,P,A Wire GECO Model No. SIS T,QT,P,A Splice Insulation Raychem Model No. WCSF-N T,QT,P,A Connectors Burndy Model No. HYLINK-YSV T,QT,P,is Terminal Block Bechanan Model No. 28100 T,QT,P,A Splice Insulation AMP Model No. 603325-1, T,QT,P,A 603328-1, 603329-1 Terminal Block Marathon Model No. 1600 T,QT,P,A Sealant Tape Raychem Model No. 5-1024 T,QT,P,A Tape Scotch Model No. 17 T,QT,P,A Sealant Scotch Model No.
T,QT,P,A Scotch-Kote Tape Scotch Model No. 27 T,QT,P,A Tape Scotch Model No. 130C T,QT,P,A Plug Connectors Pyle National Model No.
T,QT,P,A P-A-207499 P&R thru P-A-207503 P&R i
l Tape Scotch Model No. 70 T,QT,P,A
\\
j Terminal Block GECO Model No. CR-151 R,A,M l
B-13 i
APPENDIX C Equipment Considered Acceptable or Conditionally Acceptable (Category 4.3)
None in this category i
e C-1
APPENDIX D l
Safety-Related Systems List Function System Emergency Reactor Shutdown Safeguards Actuation Reactor Protection Control Rod Drive 2
Containment Isolation Primary Containment Isolation Main Steam Main Feedwater Residual Heat Removal Reactor Water Cleanup Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Emergency Service Water High Pressure Coolant Injection Reactor Core Cooling High Pressure Coolant Injection Residual Heat Removal (Low Pressure Coolant Injection Mode)
Core Spray Automatic Depressurization Containment Heat Removal Residual Heat Removal (Torus Cooling Mode)
Emergency Service Water
'The NRC staff recognized that there are differences in nomenclature of the systems because of plant vintage and engineering design; consequently, some systems performing identical or similar functions may have different names.
In those instances, it was necessary to verify the system (s) function with the responsible IE regional reviewer and/or the licensee.
2 Includes other systems with isolation valves which are not given below.
3To be covered as part of TMI-2 lessons learned.
D-1
I APPENDIX 0 (Continued)
Function System Core Resid'ual Heat Removal Residual Heat Removal (Shutdown Cooling Mode)
Emergency Service Water Prevention of Significant Containment Atmospheric Dilution Release of Radioactive Material to Environment Standby Gas Treatment Radiation Monitoring 3
Radiation Sampling Steam Leak Detection Supporting Systems Electrical Power Control Room and Safety Equipment Area Ventilation O
e o
0-2
PARTIAL REVIEW EQUIPMENT EVALUATION REPORT BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION FOR PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-278 3 STAFF EQUIPMENT EVALUATION The staff evaluation of the licensee's response included an onsite inspection of selected Class IE equipment and an examination of the licensee's report for completeness and acceptability. The criteria described in the 00R guidelines and in NUREG-0588, in part, were used as a basis for the staff evaluation of the adequacy of the licensee's qualification program.
The NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement performed (1) a preliminary evaluation of the licensee's response, documented in a technical evaluation report (TER) and (2) an onsite verification inspection (October 28-30, 1980) of selected safety-related electrical equipment.
The high-pressure' coolant injection system was inspected at Peach Bottom Unit 3.
The inspection verified proper installation of equipment, overall interface integrity, and manufacturers' nameplate data.
The manufacturer's name and model number from the nameplate data were compared to information given in the Component Evaluation Work Sheets (CES) of the licensee's report.
The site inspection is documented in report IE 50-278/80-25.
No deficier.cies were noted.
For this review, the documents referenced above have been factored into the overall staff evaluation.
3.1 Completeness of Safety-Related Equipment In accordance with IEB 79-01B, the licensee was directed to (1) establish a list of systems and equipment that are required to mitigate a LOCA and an HELB and (2) identify components needed to perform the function of safety-related display informtion, post-accident sampling and monitoring, and radiation monitoring.
The staff developed a generic master list based upon a review of plant safety analyses and emergency procedures.
The instrumentation selected includes parameters to monitor overall plant performance as well as to monitor the performance of the systems on the list.
The systems list was established on the basis of the functions that must be performed for accident mitigation (without regard to location of equipment relative to hostile environments).
The list of safety-related systems provided by the licensee was reviewed against the staff-developed master list.
Based upon information in the licensee's submittal, the equipment location references, and in some cases subsequent conversations with the license-the staff has verified and determined that the systems included in the lio 5
submittal are those required to achieve or support:
(1) emergency reactu
shutdown, (2) containment isolation, (3) reactor core cooling, (4) containment heat removal, (5) core residual heat removal, and (6) prevention of significant release of radioactive material to the environment.
The staff therefore concludes that the systems identified by the licensee (listed in Appendix D) are acceptable, with the exception of those items discussed in Section 5 of this report.
Display instrumentation which provides information for the reactor operators to aid them in the safe handling of the plant was not specifically identified by the licensee. A complete list of all display instrumentation mentioned in the LOCA and HELB emergency procedures must be provided.
Equipment qualifica-tion information in the form of summary sheets should be provided for all components of the display instrumentation exposed to harsh environments.
Instrumentation which is not considered to be safety related but which is mentioned in the emergency procedure should appear on the list.
For these instruments, (1) justification should be provided for not considering the instrument safety related and (2) assurance should be provided that its subsequent failure will not mislead the operator or adversely affect the mitigation of the consequences of the accident. The environmental qualifica-tion of post-accident sampling and monitoring and radiation monitoring equipment is closely related to the review of the TMI lessons-learned modifications and will be performed in conjunction with that review.
The licensee identified 528 items of equipment whicn were assessed by the staff.
3.2 Service Conditions Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21 requires that the 00R guidelines and the "For Comment" NUREG-0588 are to be used as the criteria for establishing the adequacy of the safety-related electrical eqJipment environmental qualifi-cation program. These documents provide the option of establishing a bounding pressure and temperature condition based on plant-specific analysis identified in the licensee's Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) or based on generic profiles using the methods identified in these documents.
On this basis the staff has assumed that, unless otherwise noted,' the analysis for developing the environmental envelopes for Peach Bottom Unit 3, relative to the temperature and pressure, has been performed in accordance with the requirements stated above. The staff has reviewed the CES to ensure that the qualification data envelope the specifications established by the licensee.
During this review, the staff assumed that for plants designed and equipped with an automatic containment spray system which satisfias the single-failure criterion, the main-steam-line-break (MSLB) environmental conditions are enveloped by the large-break-LOCA environmental conditions.
The staff assumed, and requires the licensee to verify, that the containment spray system is r.ot subjected to a disabling single-component failure and therefore satisfies the requirements of Section 4.2.1 of the D0R guidelines.
uuipment submergence has also been addressed where the possibility exists that flooding of equipment may result from HELBs.
2
\\
i
\\
- 3. 3 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Inside Containment The licensee has provided the results of accident analyses as follows:
Max Temp (*F)
Max Press (psig)
Humidity (%)
LOCA 297 49 100 MSLB (not provided)
(not provided)
(not provided)
The staff has concluded that the minimum temperature profile for equipment qualification purposes should include a margin to account for analytical uncertainties in the calculated temperature profiles.
A margin of 20*F above saturation is considered to be appropriate for either a postulated LOCA or MSLB, whichever is controlling, as to potential adverse environmental effects on equipment.
The licensee's spec,fied temperature (service condition) of 297 F does not satisfy the above requirement.
The licensee should update '11s equipment summary tables to a temperature margin of at least 20 F above saturation.
If there is any equipment that does not meet the staff position, the licensee must provide either justification that the equipment will perform its intended function under the specified conditions or propose corrective action.
3.4 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Cciiditions Outside Containment The licensee has provided the temperature, pressure, humidity and applicable environment associated with an HELB outside containment.
The following areas outside containment have been addressed:
Room (s)
Description (1) 38, 39, 40, 41, Residual heat removal pumps 156, 157, 158, 159 (2) 47 Reactor core isolation cooling pumps (3) 48 High pressure coolant injection pumps (4) 46 Reactor sump pump (5) 42, 43, 44, 45 Core spray pumps (6) 33 Standby gas treatment room (7) 162 Cooling water equipment room (8) 160, 161 Vacuum breaker area (9) 146 Control rod drive (10) 248, 249 Isolation valve room (11) 257 Control rod drive (CRO) equipment area (12) 263 Drywell access (13) 254 Steam tunnel 3
(14) 252 Corridor (15) 255 Neutron monitoring room (16) 250 CR0 equipment area (17) 271, 270 Feedwater heater room j
(18) 272 Piping area (19) 447 Isolation valve room (20) 444 Operating area (21) 445, 446 Reactor water cleanup (RWCU) pump room (22) 448 RWCU regenerative heat exchanger (23) 449, 450 RWCU nonregenerative heat exchanger (24) 452 Transfer pump room (25) 453 Backwash receiving pump room (26) 514 Holding pump compartments (27) 517 Laydown area (28) 518 New fuel storage (29) 522 Source storage and calibration (30) 515 Holding pump compartment (31) 520 Reactor building vent equipment area (32) 519 Steam separator and dryer storage pit (33) 523 Laydown area (34) 516 Filter demineralizer compartments (35) 525, 526 Prefilter and high-efficiency particulate air filter compartments (36) 530 Ventilating equipment area (37) 611, 613 Laydown area (38) 614 Washdown area (39) 612 Shower room The staff has verified that the parameters identified by the licensee for the MSLB are acceptable.
3.5 Submergence The maximum submergence levels have been established and assessed by the licensee.
Unless otherwise noted, the staff assumed for this review that the methodology employed by the licensee is in accordance with the appropriate criteria as established by Com.nission Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21.
The licensee's value for maximum submergence is the 123 ft elevation.
No equipment has been identified as being below this level.
4
3.6 Chemical Spray The licensee stated that no chemical solutions are used in systems.equired for the accidents under consideration.
3.7 Aging Section 7 of the 00R guidelines does not require a qualified life to be estab-lished for all safety-related electrical equipment.
However, the following actions are required:
(1) Make a detailed comparison of existing equipment and the materials identified in Appendix C of the 00R guidelines.
The first supplement to IEB-79-01B requires licensees to utilize the table in Appendix C and identify any additional materials as the result of their effort.
(2) Establish an ongoing program to review surveillance and maintenance records to identify potential age-related degradations.
(3) Establish component maintenance and replacement schedules which include considerations of aging characteristics of the installed components.
The licensee indentified a number of components for which a specified qualified life was established (for examples, 5 years, 15 years, or 40 years). In its assessment of these submittals, the staff did not review the adequacy of the methodology nor the basis used to arrive at these values; the staff has assumed that the established values are based on state of-the-art technology and are acceptable.
For this review, however, the staff requires that the licensee submit supple-mental information to verify and identify the degree of conformance to the above requirements.
The response should include all the equipment identified as required to maintain functional operability in harsh environments.
The licensee indicated that this phase of their response is outstanding and that the review is in progress.
The staff will review the licensee's response when it is submitted and discuss its evaluation in a supplemental
- report.
3.8 Radiation (Inside and Outside Containment)
The licensee has provided values for the radiation levels postulated to exist following a LOCA.
An acceptable methodology that may be employed to determine these values was presented to the licensee as part of the NRC staff criteria contained in the 00R guidelines, in NUREG-0588, and in the guidance provided in IEB-79-018, Supplement 2.
Therefore, for this review, the staff has assumed that, unless otherwise noted, the values provided have been determined in accordance with the prescribed criteria.
The staff review determined that the values to which equipment was qualified enveloped the requirements identified by the licensee.
7 to The value required by the licensee inside containment is between 1.8 x 10 6.2 x 107 rads for the integrated dose.
These values do not envelope the 00R guideline requirements (4.0 x 107 rads) and therefore are not acceptable.
5
The radiation service condition provided by the licensee is lower than provided in the guidelines for gamma and beta radiation. The licensee is requested to either provide justification for using the lower service condition or use the guidelines for both gamma and beta radiation.
If the latter option is chosen, then the analysis, including the basis and assumptions used in the analysis and a sample calculation, should be provided.
7 rads has been A required value outside containment of 7.2 x 108 to 3.35 x 10 used by the licensee to specify limiting radiation levels within the RHR pump This value appears to consider the radiation levels influenced by the room.
source term methodology associated with post-LOCA recirculation fluid levels, and is therefore acceptable.
4 QUALIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT The following subsections present the staff's assessment, based on the licensee's submittal, of the qualification status of safety-related electrical equipment.
The staff has separated the safety-related equipment into three categories:
(1) equipment requiring immediate corrective action, (2) equipment requiring additional qualification information and/or corrective action, and (3) equip-ment considered acceptable if the staff's concern identified in Section 3.7 is satisfactorily resolved.
In its assessment of the licensee's submittal, the NRC staff did not review the methodology employed to determine the values established by the licensee.
However, in reviewing the data sheets, the staff made a determination as to the stated conditions presented by the licensee.
Additionally, the staff has not completed its review of supporting documentation referenced by the licen-see (for example, test reports).
It is expected that when the review of test reports is complete, the environmental qualification dait bank established by the staff will provide the means to cross reference eac" tapporting document to the referencing licensee.
If supporting documents are found to be unacceptable, the licensee will be required to take additional corrective ' actions to either establish qualifi-cation or replace the item (s) of concern.
This effort will begin in early 1981.
An appendix for each subsection of this report provides a list of equipment for which additional information and/or corrective action is required. Where appropriate, a reference is provided in the appendices to identify deficiencies.
It should be noted, as in the Commission Memorandum and Order, that the defi-l ciencies identified do not necessarily mean that equipment is unqualified.
l!'
However, they are cause for concern and may require further case-by-case evaluation.
4.1 Equipment Requiring Immediate Corrective Action
?
4.2 Equipment Reouiring Additional Information and/or Corrective Action Appendix 8 identifies equipment in this category, including a tabulation of deficiencies. The deficiencies are noted by a letter relating to the legend (identified below), indicating that the information provided is not sufficient for the qualification parameter or condition.
Legend R
radiation T
- temperature QT qualification time RT - required time P
pressure H
- humidity CS - chemical spray A
- material-aging evaluation; replacement schedule; ongoing equipment surveillance 5
- submergence M
- margin I
- HELB evaluation outside containment not completed QM qualification method RPN - equipment relogation or replacement; adequate schedule not provided EXN - exempted equipment justification inadequate SE" - separate-effects qualification justification inadequate QI qualification information being developed RPS - equipment relocation or replacement schedule provided As noted in Section 4, these deficiencies do not necessarily mean that the equipment is unqualified.
However, the deficiencies are cause for concern and require further case-by-case evaluation.
The staff has determined that an acceptable basis to exempt equipment from qualification, in whole or part, can be established provided the following can be established and veri'fied by the licensee:
(1) Equipment does not perform essential safety functions in the harsh envi-ronment, and equipment failure in the harsh environment will not impact safety-related functions or mislead an operator.
(2a) Equipment performs its function before its exposure to the harsh environ-ment, and the adequacy for the time margin provided is adequately justified, and (2b) Subsequent failure of the equipment as a result of the harsh environment does not degrade other safety functions or mislead the operator.
(3) The safety-related function can be accomplished by some other designated equipment that has been adequately qualified and satisfies the single-failure criterion.
7
(4) Equipment will not be subjected to a harsh environment as a result of the postulated accident.
The licensee is, therefore, required to supplement the information presented by providing resolutions to the deficiencies identified; these resolutions should include a description of the corrective action, schedules for its completion (as applicable), and so forth. The staff will review the licensee's response, when it is submitted, and discuss the resolution in a supplemental report.
It should be noted that in cases where testing is being conducted, a condition may arise which results in a determination by the licensee that the equipment does not satisfy the qualification test requirements.
For that equipment, the licensee will be required to provide the proposed corrective action, on a timely basis, to ensure that qualification can be established by June 30, 1982.
4.3 Equipment Considered Acceptable or Conditionally Acceptable Based on the staff review of the licensee's submittal, the staff identified the equipment in Appendix C as (1) acceptable on the basis that the qualiff-catien program adequately enveloped the specific environmental plant parameters, or (2) conditionally acceptable subject to the satisfactory resolution of the staff concern identified in Section 3.7.
For the equipment identified as. conditionally acceptable, the staff determined that the licensee did not clearly (1) state that an equipment material evaluation was conducted to ensure that no known materials susceptible to degradation because of aging have been
- used, (2) establish an ongoing program to review the plant surveillance and main-tenance records in order to identify eauipment degradation which may be age related, and/or (3) propose a maintenance program and replacement schedule for equipment identified in item 1 or equipment that is qualified for less than the life of the plant.
The licensee is, therefore, required to supplement the information presented for equipment in this category before full acceptance of this equipment can be established.
The staff will review the licensee's response when it is sub-mitted and discuss the resolution in a supplemental report.
5 DEFERRED REQUIREMENTS IEB 79-01B, Supplement 3 has relaxed the time constraints for the submission of the information associated with cold shutdown equipment and TMI lessons-learned modifications.
The staff has required that this information be provided by February 1, 1981. The staff will provide a supplemental safety evaluation addressing these concerns.
8 i
)
i i
APPENDIX B Equipment Requiring Additional Information and/or Corrective Action (Category 4.2)
LEGEND:
Designation for Deficiency R - Radiation T - Temperature QT - Qualification Time RT - Required Time P - Pressure H - Humidity CS - Chemical spray A - Material aging evaluation, replacement sc.nedule, ongoing equipment surveillance S - Submergence M - Margin I - HELB evaluation outside containment not completed QM - Qualification method RPN - Equipment relocation or replacement, adequate schedule not provided EXN - Exempted equipment justification inadequate SEN - Separate effects qualification justification inadequate QI - Qualification information being developed RPS - Equipment relocation or replacement schedule provided Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Differei,tial Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-ll6A,8 T,P,A Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-116C,0 T,P,A l
Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-117A,B T,P,A l
Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-117C,0 T,P,A I
Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-118A,B T,P,A Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-118C,0 T,P,A l
Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-119A,B T,P,A Differential Pressure Switch Rosemount DPIS-2-119C,0 T,P,A i
Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-116A,B T,P a l
Transmitter B-1
{-
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-116C,0 T,P,A Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-117A,B T,P,A Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-117C,0 T,P,A Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-118A,8 T,P,A Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-1180,0 T,P,A Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-119A,B T,P,A Transmitter Differential Pressure Rosemount DPT-2-119C,0 T,P,A Transmitter Position Limit Switch Namco POS-02-86A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,H,A Pressure Switch Barksdale PS-2-3-52A R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Barton PS-2-3-528,0 T,P,H,A Pressure Switch Barksdale PS-2-3-52C R,T,P,A Level Ind. Switch Yarway LIS-2-3-57A,B R,T,P,H,A Level Ind. Switch Yarway LIS-2-3-58A,8 R,T,P,H,A Level Ind. Switch Rosemount LIS-2-3-83A,b T,QT,P,A Level Ind. Switch Rosemount LIS-2-3-99A,B,C,0 T,P,A Level Ind. Switch Rosemount LIS-2-3-101A,B,C,0 T,P,A l
Level Ind. Switch Rosemount LISH-2-3-72A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,A Level Switch Rosemount LSL-2-3-72A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,A Level Switch Rosemocat LSLL-2-3-72A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,A Level Transmitter Rosemount LT-2-3-83A,B T,P,A Level Transmitter Rosemount LT2-3-72A,B,C,0 T,P,A B-2 L
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Comoonent No.
Deficiency Level Transmitter Rosemount LT-2-3-99A,B,C,0 T,P,A Level Transmitter Rosemount LT-2-3-101A,B,C,0 T,P,A Pilot Solenoid Valve Automatic Valve RV-02-71A,B,J,G,K QT,T,P,A Corp.
Pilot Solenoid Valve Automatic Valve RV-02-710,E,F,H,J L QT,T,P, A Corp.
Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-2-38A,8 QT,T,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-2-53A,B QT,T,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-2-74 QT,T,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-2-77 QT,T,P,A Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-02-39 T,P,A Air Manifold Pilot Valve Automatic Valve A0-02-80A,B,C,0 QT,T,P,A Corp.
Air Manifold Automatic Valve A0-02-86A,B,'C,0 QT,T,P,A,H Corp.
Air Operated Vaive ASCO A0-02-316 T,P,A Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-02-317 T,P,A Inverter Topaz INV.02-3-402A,B T.R,A,H,P Power Supply Elma E/5-02-3-402A,B-P,R,QT,A,H,T Position Limit Switch Namco P05-02-80A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,A,H Auxiliary Relay Agastat 5A-K25A,B,C,0 T,P,A,H Auxiliary Relay Agastat 5A-K26A,B,C,0 T,P,A,H Auxiliary Re'ay Agastat 5A-K28A,B,C,0 T,P,A,H Auxiliary Relay Agastat 5A-K29A,B,C,0 T,P,A,H Auxiliary Relay Agastat 5A-K30A,B,C,0 T,P,A,H Auxiliary Relat Agastat 5A-K31A,B,C,0 T,P.A,H B-3
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-5-12A,B R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Static-0-Rinc PS-5-12C,0 R,T,P,A Solenoid Valve GEC0/ASCO SV-3-13-118 T,P,QT,A,M Solenoid Valve GECO SV-3-13-117 T,P,QT,A,M Differential Pressure Ind.
Barton DPIS-23-76,23-77 T,P,A,H Sw.
Pressure Switch Barksdale PS-23-68A,B,C,0 R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-23-97A,B R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-23-84-1 R,T,P,A Flow Switch Barton FS-23-78 R,T,P,A Flow Transmitter GECO FT23-82 R,T,QT,P, H,A Level Switch Robert Shaw LS-23-91A&B R,T,P,A HPCI Pump / Turbine GECO MPL23-1&2 R,T,QT,P, H,A Valve Actuaf.or Limitorque M0-23-14 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-2-23-15 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-16 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-17 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-19 R,T,QT,P, A,H Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-20 RT,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-21 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-24 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-25 R,T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-23-31 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-23-58 T,QT,P,A B-4
9 APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-4245 R,T,QT,P,H,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-23-42 T,P,A Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-23-43 T,P,A Auxiliary Relay Agastat 10A-K150C,0 T,P,A,H Auxiliary Relay Agastat 10-K150E,F,G,H T,P,A,H Auxiliary Relay Agastat 10A-K150J,K,L,M T,P,A,H Differential Pressure Ind.
Barton DPIS-10-121A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Sw.
Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-10-100A,B,C,0 R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-10-101A,B,C,0 R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-10-120A,C,E,G R,T,P,A Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-10-1208,D,F,H R,T,P,A Pump Motor GEC0 2AP35 QT,R,T,P,A,M Pump Motor GEC0 2BP35 QT,R,T,P,A,M Pump Motor GEC0 2CP35 QT,R,T,P,A,M Pump Motor GEC0 20P35 QT,R,T,P,A,M Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-13A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-15A R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-23-57 T,P,QT,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-15B,C,D T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-16A,B,C,0 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-10-17 T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M02-10-18 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-25A R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-25B R,T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-33 T,QT,P,A,H l
B-5 t-m
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-34A,B R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-38A,B T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-39,A,B T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-10-154A,8 R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-10-174 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-10-176 T,QT,P,H,A Pressure Switch Barton DPIS-14-81A T,P,A,H Diff. Pressure Switch Barton DPIS-14-81B,C,0 T,P,A,H Pressure Switch Static-0-Ring PS-14-044A,B,C,0 R,T,P,A Motor GECO 3AP37 T,P,A,H Motor GEC0 3BP37 T,P,A Motor GEC0 3CP37 T,P,A Motor GEC0 3DP37 T,P,A, Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-14-005A,B,C,D T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-14-007A,B,C,D T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-14-11A,B R,T,QT,P,H,A R,T,QT,P,H,A l
Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-14-12A,8 l
l Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-14-26A,8 T,QT,P,A Solenoid Pilot Valve ASCO SV-30452,53,61,62 QT,T,P,A,M
\\
~
Solenoid Pilot Valve ASCO SV-30457,58 T,P,A l
Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-30459,60,63,64,67,68 T,P,A Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-30465 T,P,A r
i Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-30466 T,P,A l
l Solenoid Pilot Valve ASCO SV-30469-1,2 T,P,A,M I
Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-30470-1,2 T,P,A,M l
B-6
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Descriotion Manufacturer Comconent No.
Deficiency Solenoid Valve ASCO SV-30479-1,2 T,P,A,M Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-5948A,8 T,P,A Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-5949A,B T,P,A Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-5950A,B T,P,A
~
Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-5951A,B T,P,A Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-5960A,B,C,0 T,P,A Solenoid Valve Target Rock SV-5961A,B,C,0 T,P,A Analyzer Rack Comsip Delphi, Inc. A5215 T,RT P,H,A Analyzer Rack Consip Delphi, Inc. BS215 T RT,P,H,A Analyzer Rack Consip Delphi, Inc. CS215 T RT,P,H,A Analyzer Rack Consip Delphi, Inc. 05215 T.RT,P,H,A Temperature Element Burns Engineering TE-5931A,B,C,0 R T,QT,P,H,A Temperature Element Burns Engineering TE-5936A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Temperature Element Burns Engineering TE-5937A,B,C,0 R T,QT,P,H,A Temperature Element Burns Engineering TE-5938A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Temperature Element Burns Engineering TE-5939A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Temperature Element Burns Engineering TE-5941A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Temperature Element Burns Engineering TE-5942A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Temperature Element Burns Engineering TE-5943A,B,C,0 R,T,QT.P.H,A Temperature Element Burns Engineering TE-5944A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,P,H,A Radiation Element GECO RE-17-430A,B,C,0 R,T,QT,RT,P,A Radiation Element GECO RE-17-432A,B,C,D R,T,QT,RT,P,A Area Cooler Joy, H.K. Porter 3EV24,3FV24 R,T,QT,P,H,A Reliance Motor Area Cooler Joy, H.K. Porter 3GV24,3HV24 R,T,QT,P,H,A Reliance Motor B-7
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Comoonent No.
Defi,giancy Area Cooler Joy, H.K. Porter 3AV25 R,T,QT,P,H,A Reliance Motor Area Cooler Joy, H.K. Porter 3CV25,30V25 R,T,QT,P,H,A Reliance Motor Area Cooler Joy, H.K. Porter 3EV25,3FV25 R,T,QT,P,H,A Reliance Motor Area Cooler Joy, H.K. Porter 3GV25,3HV25 R,T,QT,P,H,A Reliance Motor Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3334A,8 T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3335A,B T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3335C,0 T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3335E,F T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3335G,H T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3336A,B T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3336C,0 T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3336E,F T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3336G,H T,P,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GECO N-3682,N-3683 T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GEC0 N-3692,N-3693 QT,R,T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GEC0 N-3772,N-3773 QT,R,T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GECO N-3783,N-3784 QT,R,T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GECO N-3792,N-3793 T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GEC0 N-3861,N-3871 T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GECO N-3884,N-3885 R,T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GEC0 N-3991,N-3992 T,P,H,A,M Control Station (Switch)
GECO N-3994,N-3995 R,T,QT,P,H,A Diff. Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-30400-3,4 R,T,QT,P,H,A l
l l
B-8
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Oescription Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Diff. Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-30400-5,6 R,T,QT,P,H,A Diff. Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-30400-7,8 R,T,QT,P,H,A Diff. Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-30400-9,10 R,T,QT,P,H,A Diff. Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-30400-11,12 R,T,QT,P,H,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-14-70&71 T,QT,P,H,A Diff. Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-30400-13,14 R,T,QT,P,H,A Diff. Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-30400-15,16 R,T,QT,P,H,A Diff. Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-30400-17,18 R,T,QT,P H,A Diff. Pressure Switch Dwyer DPS-30400-19,20 R,T,QT,P,H,A Area Cooler H.K. Porter, Joy 3AV23,38V23 R,T,QT,P,H,A Reliance Motor Area Cooler H.K. Porter, Joy 3AV24,3BV24 R,T,QT,P,H,A Reliance Motor Area Cooler H.K. Porter, Joy 3CV24,3DV24 R,T,QT,P,H,A Reliance Motor AC132,8C132 R,T,QT,P,H,A Time Delay Relay (63-0400-3 thru 20)
CC132,0C132 Aux. Relay (63X-System)
GECO AC131,8C132 R,T,P,H,A,J CC132,0C132 Diff. Press. Ind. Switch Barton DPIS-12-124A,8 R,T,P,A l
Diff. Press. Ind. Switch Barton DPIS-13-83,84 T,P,A,H Valve Actuator Limitorque M02-12-15 T,QT,P,A
~
Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-12-18 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-12-68 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M02-13-15 T,QT,0,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-13-16 R,T,QT,P,H,A l
Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-13-27 T,QT,P,H,A B-9
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-13-30 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-13-41 T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-3200A,B T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque M0-3201A,B T,QT,P,A Valve Actuator Limitorque MO-5244 T,QT,P,H,A Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3505 T,P,A Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3506 T,P,A Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3507 T,P,A Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3509 T,P,A Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3510 T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3511 T,P,A Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3512 T,P,A Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3513,14 T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3519 T,P,A Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3520 T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3521A,B T,P,A,M T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3523 AirOperatedVaive ASCO A0-3968 T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-3969A T,P,A Plug Connectors Pyle National Model No.P-A-207499 T,QT,P,A P&R Thru P-A-207503 P&R Air Operated Valve ASCO A0-5235 T,P,A,M Air Operated Valve Atkomatic SV-3671A,B,C,0,E,F T,QT,P,A,RPN B-10 m
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component No.
Deficiency Solenoid Valve Atkomatic SV-3671G T,QT,P,A,RPN Solenoid Valve Atkomatic SV-3978A,B,C,0,E,F,G T,QT,P,H,A,RPN Solenoid Valve Atkomatic SV-3980 T,QT,P,A,RPN Low Voltage Power and ASCO SV-20-82,83,94,95 T,P,A,M Control Penetration Low Voltage Power and GECO 3N105A,B,C,0 A,M Control Penetration 3N106A,B,C,0 High Voltage Physical Science N101A,B,C,D,E,F A,M Penetration Load Center ITE 30810,11,12,13 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer 30836 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer 30837 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hammer 30838 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer 30839 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer 30011 R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hammer N310025A R,T,QT,P,H,A Motor Control Center Cutler Hamer N310025B R,T,QT,P,H,A Cable Rockbestos Model No.Firewall IV T,QT,P,A Cable Rockbestos Model No.Pyrotrol T,QT,P,A Wire GECO Model No. SIS T,QT,P,A Splice Insulation Raychem Model No. WCSF-N T,QT,P,A Connectors Burndy Model No. Hylink-Ysv T,QT,P,A Terminal Block Bechanan Model No. 2B100 T,QT,P,A Splice Insulation AMP Model No. 603325-1,603328-1 T,QT,P,A Model No. 603329-1 B-11
APPENDIX B (continued)
Equipment Description Manufacturer Component Ns.
Deficiency Terminal Block Marathon Model No. 1600 T,QT,P,A Sealant Tape Raychem Model No. S 1024 T,QT,P,A Tape Scotch Model No. 17 T,QT,P,A Sealant Scotch Model No. Scotch-Kote T,QT,P,A Tape Scotch Model No. 27 T,QT,P,A Tape Scotch Model No. 130C T,QT,P,A Plug Connectors Pyle National Model No. P-A-197499 P&R' T,QT,P,A thru P-A-207503 P&R Tape Scotch Model No. 70 T,QT,P,A Terminal Block GECO Model No. CR-151 R,A,M 4
I
=
B-12
APPENDIX C Equipment Corsidered Acceptab'le or Conditiona'ly Acceptable 1
(Category 4.3)
Item Equipment Manufacturer Model Deficiency No equipment in this category for Peach Bottom Unit 3.
1 a
l 8-t l
I l
C-1
\\
APPENDIX D i
Safety Related Systems List Function System Emergency Reactor Shutdown Safeguards Actuation Reactor Protection Control Rod Drive 2
Containment Isolation Primary Containment Isolation Main Steam Main Feedwater Residual Heat Removal Reactor Water Cleanup Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Emergency Service Water High Pressure Coolant Injection Reactor Core Cooling High Pressure Coolant Injection Residual Heat Removal (Low Pressure Coolant Injection Mode) i Core Spray Automatic Depressurization Containment Heat Removal Residual Heat Removal (Torus Cooling Mode)
Emergency Service Water
'The NRC staff recognized that there are differences in nomenclature of the systems because of plant vintage and engineering design; consequently, some systems performing identical or'similar functions may have different names.
In those instances, it was necessary to verify the system (s) function with the responsible IE regional reviewer and/or the licensee.
2 Includes other systems with isolation valves which are not given below.
j 3To be covered as part of TMI-2 lessons learned.
D-1
APPENDIX D (Continued)
Function System Core Residual Heat Removal Residual Heat Removal (Shutdown Cooling Mode)
Emergency Service Water Prevention of Significant Containment Atmospheric Dilution Release of Radioactive Material to Environment Standby Gas Treatment Radiation Monitoring 3
Radiation Sampling Steam Leak Detection Supporting Systems Electrical Power Control Room and Safety Equipment Area Ventilation AA 0 31981 e
0-2
..