ML19340C640
| ML19340C640 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 11/07/1980 |
| From: | Sylvia B VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.) |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19340C639 | List: |
| References | |
| 861, NUDOCS 8012170031 | |
| Download: ML19340C640 (2) | |
Text
_ _.
- t l
VInOINIA EI.ECTRIC ann Powsm COMPANY Hrcumonn,VrmonwrA suust 9y
~ November 7, 1980 Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Serial No. 861 Office of Inspection and Enforcement N0/RMT:ss U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket No. 50-338 Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 License No. NPF-4 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 i
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
We have reviewed your letter of October 14, 1980 in reference to the inspection conducted at North Anna Power Station on September 11 through 12, 1980 and reported in IE Inspection Report No. 50-338/80-33.
Our response to the speci-fic infraction is attached.
We have determined that no,roprietary information is contained in the report.
Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company has no objection to this inspection report being made a matter of public disclosure.
I Very truly yours, B. R.
ylvia l
Manager - Nuclear Operations and Maintenance Attachment
(
cc:
Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing l
Mr. B. Joe Youngblood, Chief Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing i
l l
I 8012170 03)
Attcchment
~.
Pcg2 1 of 1 RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION ITEM REPORTED DURING NRC INSPECTION CONDUCTED FROM SEPTEMBER 11 THROUGH SEPTEMBER 12, 1980 NRC COMMENT As required by Criterion XVI of Appendix B to 10 CFR 50, and implemented by Vepco Topical Report VEP-1-3A, Section 17, paragraph 17.2.16, states in part that significant adverse quality conditions are identified, documented, their cause determined, an'd corrective actions taken to preclude their repetition.
Vepco's response to Notice of Violation 338/79-47-01, dated January 15, 1980, described the corrective actions and specified March 15, 1980 as the date when full compliance would be achieved.
Contrary to the above, on September 11, 1980, the inspector determined by record review and interviews that full compliance had not been achieved as the specified corrective actions had not taken place.
This is an infraction.
RESPONSE
The above infraction is correct as stated.
Specifically, p2rsuant to Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice", Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following information is submitted:
1.
Corrective steps taken and results achieved: Welding procedures in-volving combination processes have been amended as needed to include I
the weld metal thickness range as deposited by each individual l
process.
I 2.
Corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further noncompliance:
We believe that no further corrective action is required for this specific item.
In addition, the Commitment Tracking Program at the i
time of this infraction was not implemented fully.
However, at l
present the tracking program has been implemented and is updated weekly.
3.
Date when full compliance will be achieved:
a.
All necessary revisions to the welder performance qualifica-tions involving combined processes have been completed and full compliance has been achieved.
b.
All necessary revisions to the procedure qualification records of weld process specifications involving combined processes will be completed and full compliance will have been achieved by November 15, 1980.
,--