ML19329D722

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Re Interpretation of 10CFR55. Specific Situation Needed for Adequate Reply
ML19329D722
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/07/1976
From: Collins P
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Hebb G
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
Shared Package
ML19329D718 List:
References
NUDOCS 8003170507
Download: ML19329D722 (1)


Text

C'

[

O UT::ITED STATES N.~LE Aft ' R EGULATORY CO.'.".* l S S IO N W A$if..;G T o*J. D.

C.

20505 7 M8 w

-o..w..

Mr. Garrett P. H::bb i,

SOP-2646 qq w

a g

-. t-. s... i.c..

D A

i d,.

c 1

.9 Crystal River, Florida 32629

.Ww w.

Dear Mr. Hebb:

This is in reply to your letter dated April 28, 1976, regarding Paragraph 55.4(c) of 10 CFR Part 55.

nature t'c.c :.plicabi'.ity of parti:ular sections or ter.s cf In : natters of t'..i:

Commission regulaticus, including 10 CFR Part 55, normally depend upon a specific factual ~ situation. Your inquir; is t:o vague for us to be able to respond directly, or for our reply to have any meaning in a specific situation.

Consequently, prior to providing an answer to your request, we would need for you to provide a specific factual situatica as it relates to the questien you have regarding Para _raph 55.4(e).

i.

I hope this information will be of use to you.

Sin cerely,

3 l.

.,/p/ l

-./

//M

/..

...'.v..

s cp-Paul F. Collins, Chief Operator Licensing Branch Division of Project Management 8003170%

1

-s-

.~~

'm----

n.

[

'