ML19329D716

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposes Revision to Radiochemical Lower Limits of Detection More Conservative than Util Revision
ML19329D716
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/27/1978
From: James O'Reilly
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Higginbotham L
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
References
NUDOCS 8003170501
Download: ML19329D716 (2)


Text

S UNITED STATES usup%

NUCLEAR REGULATCRY COMMISSION g

CEGloN 11

-)**

g 23o PE AcHT:'E E STREET. N.W. SUITE 1217

  • 5 J[

ATLANTA GEORGIA 30303 o,

n.-

MAR 2 7 1978 DiORANDUM FOR:

Leo B. Higginbotham, Acting Director,'FFMSI

~

FROM:

James P. O'Reilly, Director, Offica. of Inspection and Er.'orcement, RII

SUBJECT:

RADIOCHDiICAL LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION (LLD)

Two Region II licensees, Crystal River Unit 3 and Hatch Units 1 and 2, have applied to NRR for an amendment change to the Technical Specifications to revise the LLD limits on liquid radwaste. The proposed change wculd define a Sensitivity Limit of 5.0 x 10-7/I uCi/ml (where I equals the gamma incansity).

The proposed change was a result of our inspector determining that for selected nuclides (i.e., Cr-51 and Cu-64) the licensees were unable to meet their Technical Specifications limit of 5 x 10-7 uC1/ml.

As you are aware, Cu-64 is an expected effluent nuclide frco,a EWR and is a significant fraction of a BWR's gross ga=ma liquid waste.

Cr-51 is a nor=al LWR effluent nuclide. However, as specified in Regulatory Guide 1.21, if the 5 x 10-7 uC1/=1 LLD cannot be met for Cr-51, a ratio method =ay be utilized.

Our staff does not concu.- with the propcsed Technical Specifications change.

In the case of Cu-64, the licensee's proposed LLD would be (5 x 10-7.005) 1.0 x 10-4 uCi/mi or 50% of the 10 CFR 20 limit.

/

In addition, the licensee's proposed 1.0 x 10-4 uCi/ml is an LLD based upon the theoretical mini =um spectral background (appriori).

Therefore, under actual conditions (postpriori) the LLD could exceed MFC, resulting in effluenc releases.

We recommend a Technical Specifications change to read:

"LLD:

5.0 x 10-7 uC1/ml for nuclides with a halflife greater than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />; 10% of MPC for nuclides with a halflife less than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

(A halflife of less than 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> precludes a " ratio method", as described in USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.21.)"

CONTACT:

G. T. Gibson 242-5598 b

800327o of

4-H

-s

.n

.=_.

....G....__

f

/

MAR 2 71978

~

)

2 e

Please convey our assessment of the Technical Specifications change to NRR.

O-wu. b a=es P. O'Re 11y i

rector 9

e 4

1 e

t I

(

l g

._ _,. _