Letter Sequence Approval |
|---|
|
Results
- Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval, Approval
Other: ML19325E833, ML19327A643, ML19327A644, ML19327A651, ML19327A658, ML19327A660, ML19327A663, ML19327A664, ML19327A665, ML19327A666, ML19327A667, ML19327A670, ML19327A671, ML19327A672, ML19327A673, ML19327B596, ML19327B598
|
MONTHYEARML19327B5951989-05-10010 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util 860221 Proposed Amend to Licenses DPR-39 & DPR-48,revising Tech Specs to Limit Purge & Vent Valve Operation Above Cold Shutdown Project stage: Approval ML19327A6411989-05-10010 May 1989 Forwards Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Tech Spec Changes Re Purge/Vent Operation.Licensee Should Verify That Positive Stop Installed on Valve to Prevent Opening Beyond Tech Spec Angle Project stage: Approval ML19327A6611989-05-11011 May 1989 Discusses Differing Professional View Re Issuance of SER to Plant Allowing Full Power Operation W/Open 42 Containment Isolation Valves & Methodology Use for Calculating Related Offsite Doses Project stage: Approval ML19327B5881989-05-11011 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Concluding That 42-inch Containment Purge & Supply Valves Should Remain Closed in Modes l,2,3 & 4 Since Consequence of Offsite Dose to Thyroid from Iodine During LOCA Unacceptably High Project stage: Approval ML19327A6621989-05-11011 May 1989 Forwards SER Re Licensee Proposal Allowing Full Power Operation of Facility w/42 Inch Purge Supply & Exhaust Containment Isolation Valves Project stage: Approval ML19327A6431989-05-18018 May 1989 Ack Receipt of Containing Differing Prof Opinion Re Methodology Used for Calculating Related Offsite Doses. List of Persons to Be Considered as Third Member of Standing Review Panel Requested Project stage: Other ML19327A6441989-05-25025 May 1989 Submits List of Nominees for Third Member of Standing Review Panel,Per 890519 Request Project stage: Other ML19327A6661989-05-26026 May 1989 Forwards 890511 Memo Expressing Differing Professional View of B a Licciardo Re Containment Isolation Valves,For Review & Recommendation by J Miraglia Project stage: Other ML19327A6671989-06-0202 June 1989 Informs of Adequate Info Being Supplied to Initiate Review by SRP Re Differing Professional View Project stage: Other ML19327A6471989-06-23023 June 1989 Requests Notification of When Requested Info Re Containment Isolation Valves W/Regard to Fuel Failure for LOCA Analyses, Clarification of Mechanisms Used for Transporting Fission Products & View on Safety Significance Will Be Provided Project stage: Approval ML19327A6681989-06-30030 June 1989 Advises That Specific Issues Identified in 890623 Memo Would Be Further Clarified by 890717 Project stage: Approval ML19327A6691989-07-14014 July 1989 Corrected Memo Advising That 890717 Submittal,Re Clarification of Differing Prof View,Will Be Provided on 890723 Project stage: Approval ML19327A6701989-07-14014 July 1989 Advises That Info Provided by Memo Will Be Submitted by 890720 Project stage: Other ML19327A6601989-07-20020 July 1989 Discusses Differing Professional View Re Plant Containment Isolation Valves Project stage: Other ML19327A6721989-07-20020 July 1989 Evaluation of Criteria for & Calculation of Offsite Doses Deriving from Open Containment Purge Valves During LOCA at Zion Units 1 & 2 Project stage: Other ML19327A6711989-07-21021 July 1989 Notifies EDO of Status Re Differing Professional View Filed on 890511.Chronology Documents Status Encl Project stage: Other ML19327B5991989-07-27027 July 1989 Requests Listed Clarifying Info Supporting Standing Committee on Differing Prof Views (Dpv) Review of Licciardo Dpv Re Containment Isolation Valves at Plant.Info Requested by C.O.B. on 890727 Project stage: Approval ML19327A6731989-08-10010 August 1989 Discusses Differential Professional View Re Plant Purge Operation Project stage: Other ML19327A6511989-08-10010 August 1989 Forwards N Lauben Memo Re Technical Issues Raised in Dpv Concerning Containment Isolation Valves at Facilities. Rupture of High Burnup Fuel Pins During Blowdown Transient Not Credible for Existing Fuel Designs Project stage: Other ML19327A6521989-08-10010 August 1989 Comments on Dpv Concerning Early Blowdown Cladding Rupture During Large Break Loca.Table Listing Gapcon Pin Pressure Calculations Encl Project stage: Approval ML19327A6631989-08-11011 August 1989 Discusses View on Purging Re Plant Containment Isolation Valves Project stage: Other ML19327A6571989-08-21021 August 1989 Forwards Comments on Differing Prof View Re Early Blowdown Cladding Rupture During Large Break Loca.Comments Address Issues Re Cladding Rupture of High Burnup High Pressure Fuel Early in Blowdown Prior to Containment Isolation Project stage: Approval ML19327B5981989-08-22022 August 1989 Advises of Apparent Fundamental Misunderstanding in Preparation of Document Contributing to Resolution of Differing Prof View Re Containment Isolation Valves at Plant,Per 890821 Telcon W/W Hodges Project stage: Other ML19327B5961989-08-22022 August 1989 Summarizes 890822 Telcon from Licciardo Re Matl Provided to Review Panel,By Nrc,Concerning Licciardo Differing Prof View on Containment Isolation Valves at Plant.Licciardo Asked to Provide Concerns in Written Form by C.O.B. on 890822 Project stage: Other ML19327A6561989-08-23023 August 1989 Forwards Revised Comments from Gn Lauben on Differing Prof View Re Early Blowdown Cladding Rupture During Large Break Loca.Rupture of High Burnup Fuel Pins During Blowdown Transient Not Credible for Existing Fuel Designs Project stage: Approval ML19327A6641989-08-24024 August 1989 Advises That 890811 Note Providing Revised Analyses to Recognize Higher Linear Heat Generation Rates for Zion, Remain Unchanged Project stage: Other ML19327A6581989-08-25025 August 1989 Informs That Author Reviewed R Licciardo 890822 Memo to F Miraglia Re Adequacy of N Lauben Analysis of LOCA Using Low Burnup,Low Pressure Fuel & Which Have High LHGR than Analyzed by Lauben.Early Rupture of Fuel Pins Remains Valid Project stage: Other ML19327A6651989-08-29029 August 1989 Forwards Response to Question Addressed in 890822 Memo Re Containment Isolation Valves Project stage: Other ML19327A6931989-09-13013 September 1989 Lists Actions Needed to Be Taken Re Review of 890511 Differing Prof View,Including Issuance of Evaluation of Zion Tech Specs Project stage: Approval ML19327B5701989-09-19019 September 1989 Discusses R Licciardo 890511 Differing Prof Opinion.Action Requested Per Encl Murley 890913 Memo Directing NRC to Ensure That Pressure & Temp Effects During LOCA Cosidered in Review of New & Advanced Fuel Designs Project stage: Approval ML19325E8331989-10-31031 October 1989 Forwards Chronology Re R Licciardo Differing Prof View on Containment Isolation Valves at Plant.Encl 2 Is NRR Records Associated W/Differing Prof View.W/O Encl 2 Project stage: Other 1989-07-21
[Table View] |
Similar Documents at Zion |
|---|
|
Text
_,,
, J" ":
j
}j e 5l.
ENCLosuggf F. /% w.
/ -.s\\
UNITED STAT s j
I NUCLEAR REOULATORY COMMISSION f
)
wasmwovow,o.c.noese
.s May 11,1989 l
a
. MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas E. Murley, Director-Office of Nuclear Reector Regulation Robert 8.A.Licciardo,ReactorEngineer(Nuclear)-
FROM:
Plant Systems Branch Division of Engineering and Systems Technology
SUBJECT:
DIFFERING PROFESSIONAL VIEW CONCERNING a) Issuance of SER to Zion 1/2 allowing full power operation with open 42" containment isolation valves.
b) Methodolog used for calculating related offsite doses.
ThewritersubmitsaDifferingProfessionalView(DPV)inaccordancewiththe provisions of NRC Manual Chapter 4125.
This issue has arisen out of the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) undertaken for i
the Zion Units 1 and 2 as prepared by the writer; see Attachment.
The principal issue is the prudent and conservative calculation of the additions to offsite dose which may result from a LOCA at'a facility during the use of L
open purge supply and exhaust valves at full power.
The licensee for Zion 1/2 has proposed full power operation of the facility with the 42" purge supply and exhaust containment isolation valves open to a limited position of 50', and capable of isolation within seven (7) seconds I-of the.coamencement of a LOCA.
The writers SER concludes.that the 42" valves at Zion should remain closed in Modes 1, 2 3 and 4 because the consequence of the offsite dose to thyroid (from fodine),during a LOCA is unacceptably hight whole body has not been The least value for the additional offsite dose which may be evaluated.
proposedwithinthelicensingbasisis64,000removerthefirstseven(7) seconds of the LOCA.. Management staff has. disagreed with the writer's methodology and conclusion and plans issuance of a separate SER permitting The writer requests non-issuance of the related SER the operation requested.
He also proposes probability of a generic action on other to the licensee.
facilities which have been granted such licenses based on the staff's current methodology.
In general, t'he management staff has adopted a criterion described in SRP h
STP CS8 6-4 which is that providing the maximum time for closure of these containment isolation valves does not exceed 5 seconds (and by plant-specific L
exception, up to 15 seconds), then the valves would be closed before the onset of fuel failure following a LOCA so that the only contribution to offsite dose is from RCS operational levels of fission product directly discharged into containment during this period, and then through the open containment isolation I
valves before closure.
an
U 3..
Thomas E. Murley 4 /*
In evaluating the consequence for Zion, the writer has used an alternate Criterion in BTP C58 6-4 which states that.
1 "The following analyses should be performed to justify the containment purge system design:
An analysis of the radiological consequences of a loss-of-coolant accident. The analysis should be done for a spectrum of break sizes, and the instrumentation and setpoints that will actuate the purge valves closed should be identified. The source term used in the radiological c.alculations should be based on a calculation under the terms of Appendix K to determine the extent of fuel failure and the concomitant release of fission products, and the fission product activity in the primary coolant. A pre-existing'todine spike should be considered in determining primary coolant activity. Tae volume of containment in which fission products are mixed siould be justified, and the fission products from the above. sources should be assumed to be released through the open purge valves during the maximum interval required for valve closure. The radiological consequences should be within 10 CFR Part 100 guideline values."
the fuel performance over the 0-7 seconds tising these related guidelines for Zion,(by infringement of DNBR criterw) is detailed and shows that fuel failure occurs within 6 seconds of the cosinencement of the LOCA, and together with other licensing basis responses including fission product release from the fuel gap and the thermal hydraulic conditions in the core, containment and discharre nozzle, result in a substantive discharge of fission products to the environeant of far greater consequence than are calculated by the staff.
The relative consequences of these differing approaches are that whereas the staff methodology gives additions to offsite dose resulting in total doses within 10 CFR Part 100 limits, the alternate approach used by the writer shows a substantially increased offsite dose exceeding 10 CFR Part 100 Timits, with completely unacceptable consequences to Public Health and Safety.
l The writer requests review of the Differing Professional View in a timely manner in accordance with the provisions of NRC Manual Chapter 4125.
f RAW Robert B. A. Licciardo Registered Professional Engineer California Nuclear Engineering License No. N') 001056 Mechanical Engineering License No. M 015380 cc:
J. Snieiek D. Muller S. Varga C. Patel F. Miraglia l
L. Shao L
A. Thadani L
J. Wermiel l
J. Kudrick l
i--
_, _ _