Text

Performance Indicators.
	ML19325E052
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	09/30/1989
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML19325E051	List: ML19325E050; ML19325E052;
References
	NUDOCS 8911010075
	Download: ML19325E052 (92)
	v • d • e

. - ._ ._- __ _ _ _ -

g t - .

1 l

l 1

FORT CALHOUN STATION )

l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

SEPTEMBER, 1989 4

l N i l !

L :

= = ~

~

l

- /

/ :

i l ,/ l l

Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division '

Special Services

.. )

O 5 p DO R

_,,n_.m,n,-+

w

i

)

l l

l i

OMANA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT l FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ;

i i

'.l PREPARED BY: !

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION l SPECIAL SERVICES .:

5 1

i I

SEPTEMBER, 1989 l

i k

.- . , , . . . . . - . - - , - - - - , - , . - . - , - - , . - - . - - . - . - ~ . _ , . , - - . . - - . . . - -- - - - . . , - - - - . - - , .

O. ,

9) f

'i . ;

I I<.,, [

h !

}

([ l I !

L Pursuit of esc elle n c e is an attitude...

i it in volve s wis d o m and s o u n d j u dgm e n t.. . l L :

it is a lif e tim e, career long commitment... .{

~!

i it is a w ay s f lif e. . . it is doing the job i

, righ t t h e fis t tim e, svery tim e. 11 is ,

l l

in n s ts dire c t e d, n ot the result of ext e rn al ;

.)

p r i, s s u r e.s . It I .r our enn s e lf w o r t h - w h o -

i we are ont the pride e n d sa tisf a c tion that comes frem being the rig h t kind of .

i i

person, nat just in dolng the right things. [

i

Jeme: 1. O'Connor i I

i I

f I

i

, _ _ _ . . _ . , . _ . ~ _ _ ,_ , _ . _ _ _ . . - , _ _ . -

t

i. I r: ;

G ?

I i TABLE OF CONTENTS j r ;

i M o I

Distribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV l l

Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I !

Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 :

Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 i Adverse Trend Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 f

Index to Perfo.mance Indicator Graphs . . . . . . . 6 [

Performance Indicator Graphs. . . . . . . . . . . . 10 l Escalated Enforcement History . . . . . . . . . . . 66 ,

Significant Items of Interest . . . . . . . . . . . 69 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 f'

Pasis for Establishing 1989 Performance Indicator Goals , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 t

Operating Cyc16s and Refueling Outage Dates . . . . 82 ;

Production and Doeration Records. . . . . . . . . . 83 '

Data Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 l References. . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . 87

]

h i

i h

4 -, , , ----,---,.--.g, -.w,, -

, - - , - . n ,v - - , , ..v_. n ,~ - . , , , - - , - - . , . . - - - - - - - , - - - - , .

i DISTRIBUTION i a

V. W. Anderson M. J. Guinn R. L. Andrews C. W. Norris I R. H. Guy J. T. O'Connor i W. R. Bateman M. C. Hendrickson K. L. Selek W. W. Orr !

K. R. Henry E. C. Pape A. D. Bilhu J. B. Herman l C. N. Bloyd K. C. Holthaus L. L. Parent i J. P. Bobba L. G. Huliska T. L. Patterson i C. J. Brunnert R. L. Jeworski F. M. Peterson !'

N. W. Butt R. A. Johansen G. R. Peterson R. H. Cagle J. W. Johnson S. M. Peterson l C. A. Carlson D. W. Jones R. L. Phelps i G. S. Cary W. C. Jones T. J. Pirruccello i W. R. Plowman i J. W. Chase J. D. Kecy S. C. Presler i G. R. Chatfield R. C. Kellogg T. M. Reisdorff f A. G. Christensen J. D. Keppler A. W. Richard ;

R. P. Clemens D. D. Kloock R. G. Ccnner G. M. Riva !

D. M. Kobunski T. J. Sandene i J. L. Connolley G. J. Krause M. R. Core G. A. Krieser F. C. Scofield i L. G. 54alock G. M. Cook L. J. Kripal H. J. Sofick ;

P. J. Cotton J. B. Kuhr R. W. Short !

S, R. Crites L. T. Kusek D. W. Dale A. L. Shrum i R. C. Learch E L. SkagJs !

R. C. DeMeu1meester R. E. Lewis i. K. Smit 1 I

W. D. Derayer R. C. Lio'>er:tritt R. D. DtYoung C. J. Lir'Sen G. C. $sith i

0. C. Diett B. A. Livingston R. L. Svenson >

D. E. Dirris J. M. Lofshult a,T.Sptun !

D. E. Spires !

J. A. Drahota J. H. MacKinnon K. C. Stooie !

M. O. Eltway G. D. Mamon n R. G. Eurich J. W. Marcil W. Stcelt i i

H. J. Faulhaber M. L. Harfice

t. J. Sterba 1 M. A. Ferdig H. F. Sterba i

! D. J. Matthews R. K. Stulta l K. S. Field <ng J. M. Mattice g, 3, Te,pje l J. J. Fluehr L. K. McFadden M. A. Yesar 1

l J. J. Foley T. J. McIvor P. L.-Thompson !

F. F. Franco R. E. McKay J. W. Tills M. T. Frans M. L. Meador D. R. Trausch J. F. W. Friedrichsen R. F. Mehaffey P. R. Turner R. M. Fussell K. A. Miller C. F. Vanecek S. K. Gambhir R. A. Miser L. P. Walling J. K. Gasper K. J. Morris J. M. Wasrak W. G. Gates D. C. Mueller W. O. Weber M. O. Gautier R. J. Mueller G. R. Williams !

J. T. Gleason J. B. Newhouse S. J. Willrett

L. V. Goldberg M. W. Nichols D. D. Wittke -

R. E. Gray P. A. Yager iv r

l. . , . _ . , , _ _ _ - - , , - _ - , , . . . . . . , . _ , , , _ _ . . . - . _ . . . , , - - . _ . , . . . - , , - - - . , . , . _ . , . , . -

-_ _ . ._- . . _ - . ~ - _.

a PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS !

REPORT IMPROVEMENTS i The modifications to four of the Maintenance Section indicators have been i completed. These changes included changing the data source. i The four indicators that were changed include; the Ane of Outstandisa f ia' ntenance Work Orders (Non-outue) Indiestar found on page 25 t te i ta' ntenance Work Order Breakdown f ion-Outanin :.nc icator found on page 26 i the co rective Maintenance Back' on G-eater " sar D Monu ir O'd (non-outane$

Ind'cator found on page 27, and tie Latio o " co iest >r' or< tv ha' ntenance War c Orders to Total Maintenance Work Orc ers Comoleted fl on-Outane)

Ind'cator found on page 28. !

Three of these four indicators will not show data points for the month of I August,1989. The indicators not showing data for the month of August, !

198g, include;dicator the Lae of Out stanc ino Maiitenance Work Orders !

i (Non-Cutaael In "ound on page 23, the maintenance hork Order i Britakcown (Non-4 tane) Indicator found on page 26, and tlie correretive -

Ma' ntenance Bac c' oc Greater Than 3 Months Old (Nan-Outana) Ir d< cater

[

found on page 21. This data is not includec in the Performance Incicators t Report due to t.he fact that the data for these indicators is date i dependant and could not be taken from the CHAMPS database at a later date. ,

An Aaverse Trend Heport fo9ad on pege 4 has been 4Jded to the Fort I Celboun Station Performance Indicators Report for the month of September. ;

1989. This reoort will summarke the adverse trend r,aragraphs shown with !

each indicator !

1 I

I i

I l

1

c .o }

1 1

PURPOSE i

i This program titled "Perfonnance Indicators

is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The I information is presented in a way that provides ready !

identification of trends and a means to track progress toward 1

reaching corporate goals. The infonnation can be used for assessing )

and monitoring fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on i

safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company !

goals or industry information. This information can be used for ,

i comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation. i,

{

f l

i

! i t

i l

l ,

2-I

I SCOPE )

In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing this .

programs t Select the data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas. :

i Present the data in a straight forward graphical format !

using averaging and smoothing techniques.

I Include established corporate gotis and industry l l

. informatlori t'cr comparison, i i

l 1

L Oevelop formal definitions for each performance parameter. l

(, i. i R' This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow

ccep3?i ro,9 with it,dustry averaget whee 4ppropr16te.

l l >

l Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. ;

l F

i 6

3

-n--+.ym,,-, e_..,.n. . - , . - - , -----p-e.,,,.g.-- -

e,w-., r .. - - , ---.-e--

n 1 I

l i

ADVERSE TREND REPORT The Adverse Trend Report has been added to the Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Report for the month of September 1989.

This report explains the conditions under which certain indicators are showing adverse trends. This addition to the Performance Indicators Report was a request made at the Nuclear Managers Meeting held on August 9, 1989.

l fp cod Outana Rate Indicator - Page 10 i The increase in the forced outage rate for the month of September, l 1989, was due to 110.2 forced outage hours logged for the Fort !

Calhoun Station durin; September,1989. These forced outage hours t were caused by a ca)1e problem with the resistance temperature detector (RTO)onreactorcoolantpumpmotorRC-3A. l Gross Heat Rate Indicator - Paos 13 I The monthly gross heat rate and the year-to-date heat rate have '

been increasing since June,1989. The increased VAiues in July and August were due to high river water tcuperatures. Tha hi gross i heat rate value for September was due to operating power re uctions 1 from September 14th through Septeinber 3015. j

{gvivalent Availability FacQttJtlfRgigt. - Page 14 !

The decrease in ti,e monthly equivalect avellability factor during Se tomber was primarily due to the unava(1 ability of the Station !'

du ing the forced outage which occurred during the month.

[gjpggLForced Outboes PerJQQ0 Critkal Mours Indicator - Page 5.'O

! The increase in the equi > ment forced outage rate was due to 110.2 l

forced outage hours whici resulted from. a cable problem with the resistance temperature detector (RTD) on reactor coolant pump motor '

RC-3A.

Goerations and Maintenance Budoet, Indicator - Page 21 ,

The actual expenditures for operations have been above budget since March,1989. This is due to the fact that several items were not adequately included in the 1989 budget. These items include; extension of the 1988 Refueling Outage, contract security support, radiation protection support, and Design Basis support.

i

. ~.

ADVERSETRENDREPORT(CONTINUED)

DG Reliability Last 100 Demands Indicator - Page 23 The decreate in the was caused by a fa' wrcent of reliability for diesel generator D-2 lure that occurred during the month of July.This failure was due to th diesels and possibly in diesel exhaust systems, part due to the missing insulation from the c

Hazardout Waste Produced Indicat e. - Page 41 The hi waste"gh amount of hazardous waste classified as *other hazardous was caused by a mercury spill at the sulfuric acid tank located on the east side of the service building.

Temoorarv Modifications (Excludine scaffoldina) Indic de,t - Page 51 Temporary modifications continue to increase due to the age of the plant, discovery of design basis discrepancies, the length of time required to resolve design discrepancies and the need for outage conditions to resolve many items currea,tly being satisfied with temporary Ludifications.

I Bagtr,dgh)Liniurv Q.tDLLO.quenev R21,t_1pfgAtgt Page 5? -

The rnordable reported as injury frcouency rate for the month of September was 2.7. This increasing frequency rate is dut to 8 n

recordsble injuries that have been reported during 1989.

N.lD2r .lalGrv Cases Per_ Mont%)Aiicater - Page 53 1

Tho number of air.or 'anjuries have increased since June,1989. This is due to 8 minor injuries reported in ,)u'y, 14 minor injuries nip?rted in August, and 10 minor imjuries reported in September.

Personnel Turnover Rate Indicator - Page 54 The turnover rate for the Quality and Environmental Affairs Division increased during the month of September due to one resign: tion during the month.

t i 1

)

', PERFORMANCE INDICATORS !

INDEX TO GRAPHS j

l i

INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS j i

Forced Outage Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 i Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrans While Critical. . . . . . . . 11 f 1

Unplanned Safety. System Actuations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 ;

Gross Heat Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 I t

iquivalent Availability Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Fuel Reliability Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 l

Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . . 17 l Disabling Injury Frequency Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 !

o' :

?

(i l

l-1 l

l l !

1

1 I

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS i INDEX TO GRAPHS l (CONTINUED) :

OPERATIONS 5 L

Forced Outage Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrans While Critical. . . . . . . . 11 ,

Unplanned Safety System Actuations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Gross Heat Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 l Equivalent Availability Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 '

Fuel Reliability Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 l

Daily Thermal Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 j Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours . . . . . . . . 20 t Operations and Maintenance Budget. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Documer.t Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 !

Main 1.EM4Ef4. ;

Diesel Generator Reliability (100 Demands) . . . . . . . . . . . 23 l a

Utesel Generator Reliability (20 Demands). . . . . . . . . . . . 24 i t

Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders . . , . . . . . . . . 25 t

Maintenance Work Order Breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Montht Old . . . . . . . . . . 27 ,

i Ratio of Highest Priority MW0's to Total MWO's Completed . . . . 28 ;

Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 t

Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

30 Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments. . . . . . . . 31 !

Craf t Work Activity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 ,

l l 1

1

. . . - ~ . . . - _ . . . . _ . . . _ , . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _.. - --

i , 1 n

I PERf0RMANCE INDICATORS l INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINUED) ;

i l

MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED)

]

1 Maintenance Ove-time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 I Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . . 34 ,

l Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) . . . . . 35 l

NumberofNuclearPlantReliabilityDataSystem(NPRDS) l Reportable Failures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 l

[ CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION ;

i-Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . . . . 16 s

Volume of Low-level Solid RaJioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . . 17 Secondary System Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Primary System Chemistry - Percer t of Hours Out cf Limit . . . . 38 L

Auxiliary Systems Cheniistry Hours Outside Station Limits . . . . 39 In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service . . . . . . . . . , 40 Hazardous Waste Produced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 o Maximum Individuel Radiation Exposure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 ,

Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment. . 45 ,

Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment . . 46 MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 -

Spare Parts inventory Value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Spare Parts Issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 d

- - - - -------,,,w- , , ,.._-,----------,,,,~,,,,---~,,,--,,w.-..,n--,, -

a,,_>. ., , , , , , , - , _,,,,,---m,,, , , _, --,,,,n,,v--w+ --

'\

l l

l c PERFORMANCE INDICATORS I i- INDEX TO GRAPHS I (CONTINUED) )

i DESIGN ENGINEERING Outstanding Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 Temporary Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

]

INDUSTRIAL SAFETY l

Disabling Injury Frequency Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 l 1

Recordable lidury Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 :

Minor Injury cases per Month . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 j i

HUMAN RESOURCES l t

Nurbe of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs. . . , . . . . . . . 54 !

Personnel Turnover Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 l Staffing Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 l h !

L Tf&lfl!NG AND Oyg IFICATION [

,o ,

L SRO License Examination Pass Ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 !

i R0 License Examination Pass Ratio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 :

R0 Hot License Exams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 Hotlines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 Classroom (Instructor) Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 l i

Total Hours of Student Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 !

i 00ALITY ASSURANCE I

+

' Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours . . . . . . . . . 63 !

Percent of DR/QR's Greater Than Six Months Old . . . . . . . . . 64 4 1

DR/QR's Issued versus Significant DR/QR's Issued versus. . . . .

65 i NRC Violations Issued versus LERs Reported

.g.

1. ,

l.

^

y .

!* s I

U - Forced Outage Rate l

6 e- Fort Calhoun Goal -l L

& Industry Upper 10 Percentile >

5-L GOOD ,

, '4- 4 h

.R.

a ,

l. t 3- .

e i 2 e----o--- e ---o---o----e---e----e----e--- e----o---

l I'3 1 G O O 9 0 .l o

0' :D :

- ~ ~ ^

0 >

l '86 '87 '88 .Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May JEn 'JE1 AEg Sep 1988

[

1989 1~

l FORCED OUTAGE RATE L >

There- were 110.2 forced outage hours. logged (

i' for the Fort Calhoun Station during September,1989. The present 12 month average forced outage rate is 2.0%.

s The last forced outage at Fort Calhoun occurred three years ago in August of 1986.

The industry upper ten percentile value for the forced outage rate is 0.0%.

7 The 1989 goal for forced outage rate is 2.1%

and is based on seven days of forced outage time. The basis for establishing the 1989 performance goals can be found on page 80.

Adverse Trenct The increase in the forced outage rate dor the month of September,1989, was due to a cable problem with the resistance temperature detector (RTD) on reactor coolant pump motor RC-3A.

I i

[ ~(

, y ,.. , ,.

i i;c 5-'

Reactor Scram 4

O- Fort Calhoun Goal

-B- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-S GOOD -

3 c

r +

a o L a L a.

g, .

I l ,. l' 1- O---- e----e----e---- e---- e ----e ---- e ---- e ----s ----s----O ;

I0

'86 '87 '88 0

0 'Nt NIV Nc JIn fib MIr Apr Ny Jun JIl Aug' sip 1988 1989 l

l UNPLANNED A." MATIC REACTOR SCRAMS W - L .E CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor l scrams in September. It has been 1,186 days .

I since the last unplanned automatic reactor :

scram which occurred on July 2, 1986.

The 1989 goal for unplanned automatic reactor -

scrams wh11e critical has been set at 1. l The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The -l Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the I upper ten percentile of nuclear plant i performance in this area. j l

Adverse Trend: None 1 l

1 i

1

. . . . . _ . _ . . _ . . _ . . ~ . . - _ . . . _ . . _ _ _ _ . . _ ~ . . ~ _ _ . . _ . _ . . _ _ , . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ _ _ . _ _ . _ .

. .g 7f i

4- Safety System Actuations e- Fort Calhoun Go61

-B -Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3- -

A ;

e i t j

" GOOD l 2- Y' !

o 1 n j s j i

I L.

1- .,

l i

l -.

0 0 0 " " "

'O O O O O O O O O O

'86 '87 '88 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep '

1988 1989 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS There were no unplanned safety system actuations in September, 1989.

The 1989 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero. This goal

- is based on past performance at the Fort Calhoun Station. ,

The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations )er year is zero. The Fort ,

L Calhoun Stat' on is currently in the up>er l L ten percentile of nuclear plants for t11s l

indicator. ,

Adverse Trend: None

' y2 : j f'~lMonthlyGrossHeatRate !

- Year to Date Gross Heat Rate I e- Fort Calhoun Goal Industry Upper 10 P, EM N

, 10750- _

]

6000

)

+ ,

,,,,,==*

l B 10500- O--- \e---o-,c T "",e- --

e---e --- e ---o----o

' u l 10284 10270 K l W 10250-H 10000- G-G-B ~

e a a a a a a a a 9750

'86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 l i

L GROSS HEAT RATE The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station during September, 1989 was 10,794 BTU /KWH.

The gross heat rate values for this cycle of operation will l be increased due to the removal of the first stage of the high pressure turbine.

The 1989 year to date gross heat rate value is 10,598 BTU /KWH. The 1989 goal is 10,500 BTV/KWH. This goal value of 10,500 BTU /KWH is the theoretical best heat rate that the .

Fort Calhoun Station can obtain in its present configuration.

The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,989 ETU/KWH.

Adverse Trends: The monthly gross heat rate and the year to date heat rate have been increasing since June. The increases in the gross heat rate values for the months of July and

August were due to high river water temperatures which were affected by summer weather conditions. The high gross heat

+ rate value for September was due to reductions in power from September 14 through September 30.

I IMonthly EAF )

- 12 Month Average EAF

^ )

G- Fort Calhoun Goal G006 O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100- l 85 <

--s---e---e---e----;4 _ .q_=q, = q--+--g i

[60-e y 40 20-0

'86 '87 '88 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR The Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) was reported as 62.6% for the month of September.

The 1989 EAF goal is 84.4% while the present 12 month average EAF for Fort Calhoun is 53.2%.

The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 83.5%.

Adverse Trends: The decrease in the monthly equivalent availability factor during September was due to the unavailability of the Station during the forced outage which occurred during the month.

e 2 -aca+ 4 a - e+&,' --,+a W -w s a A--A- 6, a a- 4an a,-eA4 bi- o <sese a + *

[, ,

i 5-

Fuel Reliability Indicator- 1 i

e- Fort Calhoun Goal !

-e- In ustry d Upper 10 Percentile l 4- i i

n' a

n i 8 3- -

y 16 u 6000 ;

.r

,$ + ,.

a

,c r

g> '

a 1

4 1- G----s---e---e----e ---s---o--e----e----e- -e- - O .

3

. 0- . O

'86 '87 588 Oct Nov Dec Jan FO Mar Apr May Jun J'u'l Aug Sep

, 1988 1989 1

l- ,

FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as 0.0

~

L nanocuries/ gram for the month of September. The FRI value ,.

l for the month of September,1989, was calculated from September 1 through September 13. The FRI was not obtainable for the rest of September due to reduced power levels. , This FRI value indicates that there have been no fuel failures since startup in January, 1989.

l The higher than normal FRI figures resulted from a change L in the way that the FRI is calculated. The FRI was previously calculated using a constant letdown flow rate for the entire month, but the actual letdown flow rate is now used.

The 1989 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ gram.

L t e

The fuel reliability indicator industry upper ten l - ' percentile value is 0.07 nanocuries/ gram. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile l

of nuclear plants for this indicator Adverse Trend: None

- 15-L- ___ _ _.. . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . - - . _ . - _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ . .

. - . . .. . - - _ . . - - - . -~ -

'r ,

' Personnel Radiation Exposure

[L' 388 400 G- Fort Calhoun Goal

c. -e- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 300 GOOD

+ j 1

O w .

R \

E 200-M a c c a a a 3 g

-0 '*~~~O 74 100- O- -&~~~*.

.g.. - O....e !

I e

p...&.--O,,,

~

, ,/

b

'86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 i

PERSONNEL RADIA"ll0( EXPOSURE (CUMULA" E)

During 5 tember, 1989, 7.9 man-rem was recorded by penc . dosimeters worn by personnel while

. working at the Fort'Calhoun Station. ,

The monthly cumulative exposure goal for August was 102.5 man-rem while the actual reccrded exposure through August was 80.3 man-rem. !

l.

The personnel radiation exposure industry upper i ten percentile is 175 man-rem per unit per year.

Adverse Trend: None

f Monthly Radioactive Waste Shipped 12500- j

- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped G- Fort Calhoun Goal I

-B- Industry Upper 10 Percentile C

GOOD c 7500- 4 l i

F e &---G----&---G----&---G----&---e- --&---e----e--- e e

4096 B- O Q p l

- - - - - - - c

" " " " " " " D 2500

. 11722

'86 '87 '88 0- -

Jan F 6 Mar. Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE .

The above graph shows the amount of low-level radioactive waste shipped off-site for disposal. The table below lists the amount of -

waste actually shipped off-site for disposal plus the change in i

, inventory of waste in on-site storage in final form ready for burial. t Thevolumeofsolidradioactivewasteis(cubicfeet): i Amount Shipped in September - 0.0 Amount in Temporary Storage - 729.0 '

1989 Cumulative Amount Shipped - 4624.0 1989 Goal - 6000.0 There are two reasons for the very high amount of low-level solid radioactive waste that was shipped in January, 1989. One reason is that the 1988 refueling outage produced a large volume of radioactive waste. Also, shipping of low-level solid radioactive waste stoppad in

. ,. October, 1988, due to samples being sent off-site for isotope analysis

"'? that could not be completed at the Fort Calhoun Station.

The industry upper ten percentile value is 2,895.5 cubic feet per unit :

per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988.

Adverse Trend: None m

" . 4

)

-M- Disabling Injury Frequency Rate J

'O- Fort Calhoun Goal

" -e- Industry Upper 10 Percent.ile ;

3 1

1 L

I

2 R

.a ' f .

t

{

e ',

1- I s .3 . e....e ..e . 9 .. e ...e ..e .. s ..g...e .. g ..q9 0

0

- d " " - " " ^ " " " "

An Feb Mar Apr May Un El Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

^

'86 '87 '88 Rates.for 1986, 1989 .

1987, and 1988 [

are shown for the month of September j e

DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE l (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

There were zero disabling injuries reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in September.

The total number of disabling injuries in +

1989 is two.

The 1989 disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31% and was bascd on one disabling injury occurring in 1989. i The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury frequency rate is 0%.

P Adverse Trend None

p . ,

' ~'

C -+- Thermal Output ,

- Technical Specification Limit I

-& Fort Calhoun Gc,a1 .i L l 1500 . . . . . . . . . . ,

M

, / >

L'

-t '600- /

/

t i

s . ,

'300- j/

0 , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ., , ,

1 7 14 21 28 September 1989 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT ,

L The above thermal output graph displays the daily 1

operating power level, the 1500 thermal megawatt !

average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal. The cross hatched area represents the difference between the maximum allowable operation and the actual plant l operation.

h The percent power operation of the Fort Calhoun Station was a> proximately 100% from September 1 -

through Septem)er 13. Power was then reduced to i approximately 70% until September 25 when the power was reduced to 0%. On September 28 startup was initiated and the operating power of the Station l

L increased through September 30.

. Adverse Trend: None L

1

g.: m < ,

J i, l s ; , .1-

-M . Equipment Forced Outage Rate I o .;

8'

i" .6- GOOD ;

R a a .

+ j t

' .4-l

.2- l L .12 r 0 0 0

:: :: ,: ,, i

'86 '87 '88 Oct Nov Dec Jan F'e'b M'a'r Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep l 1988 1989 j :

\

L There kere 110.2 forced outage hours !

' repori.ed for the Fort Calhoun Station t during the month of -. September, 1989. The !

current value for the number of equipment i,

forced outages per 1000 critical hours for 3

1989 is 0.2. >

1 L The last equipment forced. outape occurred '

in 1986 and was due to a failed electrical -

l- inverter. !

Adverse Trend: The increase in the l equipment forced outages per 1000 critical i hours rate for the month of September, ,

l' 1989, was due to a cable problem with the a resistance temperature detector (RTD) on

, reactor coolant pump motor RC-3A-M.

4

_ - . - - . . _ . . . _ . . _ _ - . - . . _ _ _ _ _ . . . . - _ . . _ _ _ . - - _ _ . . - . _ . _ _ . _ _ . . . ~ _ . _ ~ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ . . - - - . . _ . . . - . _ . _ _ _ _

l

@, - Actual Operations Expenditures' l 80- <

-X- Operations Budget j o 'l M f 60 y .

.i '

1d

$40- ;

o1

.o -

na . :

L s r 20 J s 1 0 -

Jan. Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 ,

15-j

- Actual Maintenance Expenditures 12 l Maintenance Budget M

i 1 d g.

lo ,

11 '

- o l 6- '

, na srs 3 ;

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -

7 1989 i 4

OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The- Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to 1 date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for L

the Fort Calhoun Station. ;

The budget year to date for operations was 49.3 million dollars for 1- September while the actual cumulative expenditures for September totaled .

58.3 siillion dollars. 5 The budget year to date for maintenance was 9.3 million dollars for ?

L September while the actual cumulative expenditures for September totaled l

9.0 million dollars.

L Adverse' Trerds: Since March the actual expenditures for o)erations have been a)ove . >udget. This is due to the fact that several tems were not

l. adequately included for in the 1989 budget. These items include; extension of the 1988 Refueling Outage, contract security support, radiation protection support, and Design Basis support. No adverse trend associated ,

u, with the maintenance budget has been observed.

y ^ L iv <

g '500- ..*- Documents Scheduled for Review ir ,

-X-- Documents Reviewed

-+- Overdue Documents ,

400-f N.D X

'300-b u-f e m- - -

1 re :

". " 200- l ot

fs 100- ,

~ ~~~~ \ ,x i p 'N. g ~ ~~ 'N,,

~ '

O XN -----X -I # ' \'N !

Nov Dec .Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1988 1989 ,

t DOCUMENT REVIEW [

This indicator shows the number of biennial reviews completed during !

.the reporting month, the number of biennial reviews scheduled for the 4 reporting month, and the number of biennial reviews that are overdue. ,

.These document reviews are performed in house and include 5meial '

Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procec ures , i Preventive Maintenance, and the Operating Manual. The documents !'

included in the Operating Manual are Standing Orders, the Technical Data Book, the > Radiological Emergency Res ponse . Plan, Emergency Plan Implementin Procedures,g Procedures, Abnormal Operating Operating Procecures, Procedures, Operating Emergency Instructions. Operating .<

the Radiological Protection Manual, the Chemistry Manual, the Fuel ,

. Management Manual, Surveillance Tests, and Calibration Procedures.

During September there were 346 document reviews completed while 2 i document reviews were scheduled. At the end of August, there were 50 document reviews overdue. The overdue document reviews at the end of .

Septenber consisted primarily of maintenance documents. i Adverse Trend: None

fL ' f !

i 100- +- Diesel Generator No.1 '

-X- Diesel Generator No. 2 5

'98 O- Fort Calhoun Goal ;

96-s .-- e-.... e---- ....e- ----.e..... s-...-e.--- e...--.s... e ;

' ^ "

l, l,/" " "

x m m m m

n, m

p 92- '

e i y 90' C - 1 1

y e 88-n .

A t

> 86- GOOD j

. 1 84-82-e -

80 :

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 e

i L S i Diesel generator D-1 has a 95 percent reliability factor over the last 100 valid demands. !

Diesel generator D-2 has a 93 percent reliability '

factor over the last 100 valid demands.

The Fort Calhoun- goal for the diesel generator reliability is 95%. Presently D-1 meets this goal.

Admerse Tr end: Diesel generator 0-2 had a p faure during the month of July which decreased E its reliability over the last 100 demands. This l- was,due to the present ventilation scheme for the diesels and possibly in part due to the missing ,

insulation from the diesel exhaust systems. ,

l 4

lr iie + . _ - . . . . . . . . - . . _ , . - . . , , , , , . _ . _ . . - . - _ _ , , - . _ . . . - _ - , . . . ~ . . -

--,v,--- . - .

i u e- j I

- t F o l Diesel Generator No. 1 3 -X- Diesel Generator No. 2 G- 'Fort Calhoun Goal

4. . c100- l l l l l l l l l l l l 1 ,

95- 0----e----O---- e---- -----R ----*----e-----R ----e----G----- !

., - P !

e

v. "

C i . , 90- 'X X X n n X f n

t ,

l- , :

l-l~ ^

85-GOOD 80

> Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep ,

1988 1989

, i L DGRE).IABILITY LAST 26 DEMANDS 7 Diesel generator D-1 has not had a failure in the I

last 20 demands on the unit. The present reliability factor for D-1 is 100% over the last

- 20 demands.

u Diesel generator D-2 has had one failure in the

! last 20 demands. D-2 has a 95% reliability factor L

over the last 20 demands. 3 The Fort Calhoun oal for the diesel generator '

L- reliability for the last 20 demands is set at 95%. Diesel D-1 and diesel D-2 presently meet l, this goal.

l l Adverse Trend: None 1

i l L , ,

)

l 5-a e - . - , -

600-E July 1989 E August 1989 l l September 1989 10 l

Ia Fort Calhoun Goal i (zeroMWO's>12monthsold) 0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 >12 i Age in Months .

i i-f AGE OF OUTSTANDMNG MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS l

(NON-0UTAGE)

The above bar chart breaks down the

maintenance work orders by their age in months and trends each category over the '

previous three months.

The Fort Calhoun goal is to have zero outstanding maintenance work orders greater >

than 12 months old.

l This indicator now reflects the data source change for the month of September, 1989.

The August, 1989, data is not shown because the actual age breakdown data for outstanding MWO's is date dependant and I could not be taken from the CHAMPS database at a later date.

l Adverse Trend: None l

._..m_._.;...___._____...__________..._.__. . _ _ .__.... _ ____ _ _ _ _ ._ _ ... . _ _

1 1500-July 1989 l E August 1989 1200 I ISeptember 1989 Fort Calhoun Goal 900- /

/

600-

. )

300-0- C i

l Total Open Total Open Open Open MW0s Open Safety High MW0s > 3 Months Safety Related Priority Old Related MW0s gwos MW0s > 3 Months 1 Old l

MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (NON-0UTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of open non-outage maintenance work orders at the end of ,

the reporting month, along with a breakdown by l several key categories.

The Fort Calhoun goal is to have zero MWO's older than the average age of MW0's that are greater than three months old. The September goal was to have less than 496 open MW0's that are greater than three months old.

1 This indicator now reflects the data source ,

change for the month of September, 1989. The August, 1989, data is not shown because the l actual category breakdown data for outstanding 1 MWO's is date dependant and could not be taken l from the CHAMPS database at a later date.

Adverse Trend: None

l ', .

\

l h g- - Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old p 4- Industry Upper Quartile ,

80-60- ;

P .

e P

O O O O O O O O O O O T j.40-f t -

GOOD 20- Y l

F 0

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 CORRECTIVE MINTENM CE BA:KLOG y GREATER THAF 3 >(RTHS CLD i: (NON-0VTAM) ;

This indicator shows the percentage of open non-cutage corrective maintenance work orders that-are greater than three months old at the end of the reportillg month.

l. The percentage of open non-outage corrective l maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at the end of September was reported as 45.7%

The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is E

44.1%.

This indicator now reflects the data source change for the month of September,1989. The August, 1989, data is not shown because the actual corrective MWO backlog greater than 3 months old data for outstanding MWO's is dste dependant and could not be ,

taken from the CHAMPS database at a later date.

Adverse Trend: None

c. ..

3 ]

i l'

40- -

- Ratio of Highest Priority M0s to Total MOs Completed j

. l l

l 30- :

p; . 1 e

GOOD 20- '

e.

n 4

t -

10-

. i 0

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 7'

RATIO OF HIGHEST PRIORlTY MWO'S TO TOTAL MW0'S COMPLETED !

(NON-0UTAGE)

The purpose of this indicator is to monitor the ability to effectively prioritize, plan, and

, schedule corrective amintenance. A higher ratio .

l. indicates that a comparatively greater number of '

emer y type maintenance activities have been '

requ to support plant operation.

E The value for the ratio of highest priority MWO's to total MWO's completed was reported as 9.7% for the month of August, 1989. The value i 1- for the ratio of highest priority MWO's to total i MWO's completed for the month of September, b 1989, was reported as 14.3%.

l l The industry upper <

highest ariority MWO' quartile for the ratio ofs to total MWO's comple i

is no 'onger available. This indicator was discontinued for 1989 by INP0.

Adverse Trend: None 1.

l

- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance

-O- Industry Upper Quartile

{

90.~ G- Fort Calhoun Goal l 80-

.70-

'p -

l O ----G----- ---G----- s---

C 60-O--- -----Q----q-----q-----p---

-v v v v g

e n

t 50- C o o o o V 40-

^ '

GOOD .

30-20 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 RATIO 0F PREVENTIVE TO TTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-00TAGO The ratio of preventive to total maintenance

l. indicator shows the ratio of completed '

l non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance. The ratio of preventive to total maintenance at the Fort t Calhoun Station increased to 72.7% in September.

l The Fort Calhoun goal is to have a ratio of '

preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%.

The industry upar quartile value for the ratio of prevent've to total maintenance is '

57.4%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper quartile of nuclear plant performance in this area.

Adverse Trend: None

~_ . - _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ . _ _ . - _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ . _ . . . _ _ . ~ _ - . _ . . _ . . _ . . . . . . _ . . . . - . -_.

s. .. ;

i j , ,

l 2

/- i , 1

'1 i

- Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue

.k 20 _

4 Industry Upper Quartile ;

T .a e- Fort Calhoun Goal-

. l P

. 15-

.p .

.i

e. GOOD -

r.+ .

A c: 10- + (

e-d -

y.

, 5- t

^ . .

4 A O O m--c. '

c-----e---- e p

'Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 'May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988- 1989 o ;

i ,.

PREVENTIVi MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE i

y. The purpose of this indicator is to monitor '

L progress in the administration and ' execution of l preventive maintenance programs A'small percentage ,

of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a ;

station commitment to the preventive maintenance :

program and an ability to plan, schedule, and 3 perform preventive maintenance tasks as programs require.

i L The preventive maintenance items overdue value decreased to 0.29% for the month of September.

There were a. total of 1012 preventive maintenance items completed during the month with 3 calibration '

type . preventive maintenance items not completed ,

within the allowable grace period.

The Fort Calhoun . goal is to have less than 1.2%

preventive maintenance items overdue. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items t overdue is 1.5%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper quartile for this indicator.

Adverse Trend: None I

,, i

. . . . . _ _ - . ~ , _ . _ . . . . . . . . . _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ . . . _ . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - _ - _ _ _ _ . _ . . . .

- _ _. _.~ _. _ .____ _ _ __ _ . _ _ . . . _

lil ,

r Total Control Room Instruments Out-of-Service e 6 Out-of-Service Instruments Added During the Month L. L_J Out-of Service Instruments Corrected During the Month

$ . 35-

+ Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out-of-Service Instruments b '

-e- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of-Service Instruments I

.. , 1 30

' GOOD !

25- , i 1;

l' '

20- '

3.. .. .

Oct Nov Dec- Jan Feb- Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 ,

The ' Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Indicator was I 1989. In addition to the changed total number'of for thecontrol monthroom of May, instruments out-of-service,previously This indicator shown '

shows the number of out-of-service control room instruments that were L corrected during the reporting month and the number of control room o

L instruments that were added to the out-of-service control room instruments list'during the reporting month.

g There was a total of 12 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of September. During the month of September, eight out-of-service instruments were corrected and three instruments were added to the out-of-service instruments list. ,

The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 7 out-of-service control room instruments.

The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of-service l.'-

control room instruments is 9.

[ Adverse Trend: None l

EM GM m

,..n y ,s- .7 __

O .

tr; ,, \ ,' ~k

-,,,, J ... -

PE I&C hModifications(M00) l lMaint. Work Orders (MWO) e'

. !!/

f

/

'.f s

1 E Unestimated (UNE) i - ,_

n E Preventive Maintenance (PM)

,,,, E Training (TRA) N i '

E Calibration Procedures (CP) N DiEl Surveillance Tests (ST)

E Maint. Work Requests (MWR)

SB6FT WORK ACTIVITY The Craft Work Activity Indicator shows the percentage of a type of work each craft (plant personnel only) performed during the aunth. The crafts that are represented in this indicator are Electrical Maintenance (EM),

General Maintenance (GM), Mechanical Maintenance (MM), Pressure Equipment (PE), and Instrumentation and Control (I&C).

WORK ACTIVITY (IN P.ERCENT)

CRAFT MWO ,,,y,t[E,_ PM TRA CP ST MWR

.JQD EM 14.74 35.67 11.65 8.78 11.65 0.22 6.29 11.00 GM 4.30 35.98 22.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.55

0.00 49.69 26.26 5.03 10.63 0.00 3.36 5.03 PE 7.97 57.83 7.50 19.47 7.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 I&C 5.92 35.47 10.53 8.08 10.83 21.92 7.17 0.08 Adverse Trend: None

M*

m &. .;

4

, Maintenance Overtime 3

o. .

f .

,m.

. 60-1 GOOD s tr'.- i p 4

,e t

.- l ; r.

l

,, c 40 e ,

m n "

t' .

4 20-

p. ;

r 3- 0

' Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

;ff 1988 1989 ,

1 l

L -

MAINTENANCE OVERTIE ,

The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired maintenance activities with the allotted t L resources. Excessive overtime indicates l insufficient resource allocation and can lead -

to errors due to fatigue. '

The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was 24.3% during the month of September, 1989.

Adverse Trend: None 1

w a +-mw-- e .,-,-,--,,-,,.w-w,v e w -,-ee ,o,,--r-,o-r,-- www- o,,,-,w .-w+,w-

-m-www-w,r-, .,,,,vew ,-w , - , - e www,w---v-e-wmww-wv*w-*----,w,,w~

T TJ > -

q

}y 7 ^s' *

,,i.'

4

. - 100- "

0 f" t_jIdentified Incidents,

[ . -

Incident Reports Opened ;

Incident Reports Closed

.) 80-b u

,a

.,.b; .

e r

60- U E o i .g: '

l. I

" 40-1 .i d -

e. >

n' ;

.t 20-s.

I 0 -

Jan Feb Mar .Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989

-l PenrvnURAL M Mtt E IAfCE INCIDENTS .

(p AIK D ANC!) !

This indicator shows the number of incidents identified (not yet written as an IR) each month involving maintenance, the number of incident reports opened each month involving maintenance, and the number of incident reports closed each month involving ,

ma'ntenance. The Seatember data for this indicator was not aval'able.

Total Descrit' tion h h Auaust Year to date ,

Incidents. Icentified ~ 3 L 11 137 i Incident Reports Opened 4 6 12 142

Incident Reports Closed 6 0 14 71 Adverse Trends An adverse trend for this inc cator is indeterminable due to the fact that the data for this indicator was not available for the month of September.

.. , . . _ , . . . . _ _ _ . . - - ~ , , - _ . . . . . _ , . . . . _ . _ . . , _ _ . . , _ , . _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ . _ . . . _ _ _

g, t 1

%. I 4 1

- Open MW0's

, -]

-G- Fort Calhoun Goal l 800- ]

' o 700- 1

. Nf -

i u ...

mM ,

fb F 600- O----- G - - ---- G -----&---- e -----&---- e-----&---- G -----&---- O . ;

e0 -

r8 s

500- -

y 4

! 400- !

L 300 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov. Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1989 1990 1 -

\ .,

l l' MAllTENANCE WORl( Of DER BACKLOG i ll (CORRECTIVE NON-OLTAGE MAINTENANCE)

/

l '

This indicator shows the number of corrective

non-outage ' maintenance - work orders that are open at the end of the reporting month. ,

The goal for this indicator is to have less than 600 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. At the end of September, 1989, there were 587 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open.

This indicator was added to the Performance ',

Indicators Report to trend Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)ItemNo.36.

i Adverse Trend: None

.a

~;

y ,

100 I ISusPected NPRDS Failures- -

Confirmed NPRDS FMilures

- Average CE Plant Confirmed NPRDS Failures '

80- 1

!! i 60-F=

a i'

1 40-u

.r- .

e.

20-0- E -= =- E E_ _Jm EL Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May- Jun- Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989-NUMBER N NUCLEAL' PLABT f:ELIABILITY

'ATA SYT' EMT f GPll1S) h tEPORTABLE :AILL '

l!ES The suspected NPRDS reportable failures are identified by possible equipment failures on the applicable Maintenance Work Order (MWO). Only ;

after the MWO has been completed can the determination be made whether the equipment has '

failed or not. The entire 12 month graph is ;

updated on a monthly basis to reflect completed ,

MW0's. :

1

!. In September, 1989 there were 2 confirmed NPRDS re sortable failures ind 50 suspected NPRDS fa lures.

The average value for confirmed reportable equipment failures at similar Combustion ,

a Engineering (CE) designed plants is 7.0 failures per unit. The Fort Calhoun Station has a 12 month average value of 9.3 confirmed NPRDS failures, i Adverse Trend None

y ,

- Secondary Systea CPI i

+- Sec ndary System CPI Limit l 1.5-

-O- Industry Upper Quartile 1 +----+---+---+---+---+---+.---+----.p---+-----p---.+ .

GOOD

. e

.36 .5-

l IO O O O .O O O

'87 -'88 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug 1988 1989 800] - Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines I 600-GOOD H 400- -

0 -

+_

r 200- j 0

' 0 -

'87 '88 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug >

1988 1989 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY l'

The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI', [

is a calculation based on the concentration od key impurities n :

the secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of deterioration of the steam generators. The monthly CPI is plotted relative to the EPRI chemistry limit for CPI. The CPI was reported as 0.42 for the month of August. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is 0.20.

The bottom graph, Fours Chemistry is Outside Owners Guidel<nes, tracks the total aours of 13 parameters exceeding guide 11nes a during power operation. In August, 1989, there were 144 hours0.00167 days 0.04 hours 2.380952e-4 weeks 5.4792e-5 months outside owners grous guidelines. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator is no longer available.

The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.

i. Adverse Trends: None ,

1

!. l ,

L,

g. . _. _. . . - _ - . - - - - _ . - _ - . - - - - - -._

i 8' - Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit l I

6- \

p i ; .

P !

r i c 4 i.

e 3.0 I l i

GOOD !

2- +

l 10 l

. I l

0 l

'87 '88 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug j 1988 198g i f

I Pf 1hi.AY TYSTEM C 4EMISTRY f PERC E (T OF 400RS DL T OF LI MIT I I

The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of [

Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the i primary system chemistry performance by i monitoring six key chemistry parameters. l The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0.0% for :

the month of August. 100% ecuates to all !

six parameters being out of 'imit for the i month. i Adverse Trend None :

I f

k

,,s.,., ., ,-,,.--n.

g -g

-+e Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit i

-O- Industry Upper Quartile j 40-9000 l

+ !

30- l i

H e

u 20- !

r i s i O---C O O O O ;

i 10- l l i 0 0' ..

O O O O !

n

'87 '88 e Ocit N'o'y Dc Sp e Ja'n F'e'b sr A'p'r Wy Ju'n Ju'l A'u'g ,

j 1988 1989 l l

AUXILIARY MYSTEM JCCW) C O ISTRY H0bRS i 00"5; DE 5"ATION . : i I"5 The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly I hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW)- I system is outside the station chemistry !

limit. The above chemistry indicator is one l month behind the reporting period due to the l time reeded for data collection and j evaluation of- the chemistry data for the ;

station. ;

The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside :

station limits for the month of August, 1989 i was reported as rero. ,

The i ndustry upper quartile value for i auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside !

station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . The Fort !

Calhoun Station is currently performing in !

the industry upper quartile for this ares. !

Ad'.erse Trend None ;

- cet- --w-e-e--.m.,,=--.n,7ew ww.- eev-..w- ---w-c..ve.-mim---ewe-,..., - - _ , . - - - - . . _ - - - , . - _ - - , _ _ + - ~ . ..,e mw.-s -w-e--.--. , , ,

i E Number of Out-of-Service Instruments i 25, O- Fort Calhoun Goal l

20- i N n! <

u, !

' t 15<- !

.bp j e u' -

l Ta .;

e 10< '

en I ft <

s 5<

l

. ..cy . ...o. .... o . . ...o ....o... . e..... o .....cy.. .. e l 0- - -

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun !

l 1989 1990 f i i l ;

IN. LIE CHDISTf Y IMfTRUENTS 00T.7-5 :RVI C :

l t

This indicator shows the total number of in-line !

chemistrr system instruments that are ;

out-of-serv;'ce at the end of the reporting month. !

The chemistry systems involved in this indicator ;

include the secondary System and the Post Accident !

SamplingSystem(PASS). l At the end of September there were a total of 18 !

in-line chemistry instruments that were !

out-of-service. Thirteen of these instruments were :

from the Secondary System and five were from PASS. ;

l The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line i chemistry system instruments that are i out-of-service is 3. !

L Adverse Trendt None i L i h

t

-40

I I

Weste Oil I

, 1600-Non-Halogenated Hazardous Waste l Halogenated Hazardous Waste I R Other Hazardous Waste i 1200- -

jf '

oy .,

9*

r 800-a i

se e ,t s -

400-Alllinll i

0-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec j l

j 1989 i I

i l h HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the amount of waste oil, !

non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated !

hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste !

produced by Fort Calhoun each month. !

During the month of September, 341.5 kilograms L of waste oil was produced, 0.0 kilograms of :

non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced, .

142.0 kilograms of h61ogenated hazardous waste !

U was produced, and 1204.6 kilograms of other i hazardous waste was produced.

Adverse Trend: The high amount of other l hazardous waste produced was caused by a mercury l spill at the sulfuric acid tank located on the east side of the service building. !

1 4

6 1

i i

5000- \

O Month !

g Quarter OPPD Limit !

3 Year i 4000-o :

l

[

~

3000- !

' j R , i i

E '

2000- ,

i 1000- i 0

August 1989 i MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE [

The Maximum Individual Radiation Ex>osure graph is one i i month behind the reporting period oue to the lag time ;

i involved with collecting and calculating the radiation j exposure for the station. !

I During August, 1989 an individual accumulated 416 den which was the highest individual exposure at the For+

Calhoun Station for the month. ,

l The maximum individual exposure so far for the third !

l quarter of 1989 was 546 dem. l I

L The maximum individual exposure for the year so far was 907 dem. j l

The maximum accumulated 1968 individual exposure was !'

2,371 dem, received by a visiting contractor during the refueling outage, i

The 0?PD limit for the maximum yearly individual ;

j. radiation exposure is 4,500 d em/ year

! Adverse Trends None l

'l

. Monthly Contaminations

- Cumulative Contaminations G- Fort Calhoun Goal 400-

+- Industry Upper Quartile 357 P j

i r i s 300- l o GOOD i n 4 !

n e 200-161 1

^

O O O O O O O O ;

C O F ...e. -O I

100 ;

' *O - * ~~~ !

-O.

-O_p-O !

0 " " ""' " - -

I

'87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec !

1989 ,

6 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS r .

l There was a total of 3 skin and clothing !

l contaminations reported for the Fort i Calhoun Station during September, 1989. !

l These contaminations consisted of two i clothing contaminations and one skin a contamination.

]'

There have been a total of 113 skin and l clothing contaminations so far in 1989. The i i

1989 goal for skin and clothing is 110 i l contaminations.

The industry upper quartile value for total !

skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.

Adverse Trend None .

l

~-.

a l

l i

- Decontaminated Auxiliary Building l l

100- !

1 I [. - -

I Li l' 0, s 80-P f60 n - -

t '

40- 1 A )

l G000 l 20- !

0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 I 6 LDING i This graph shows the percentage of the -

auxiliary building which is decontaminated !

(clean)basedonthetotalsquarefootage.

1989, 79.0% of the total I As of September square foota9e of t30,he auxiliary building was :

decontaminated. 1 Adverse Trand: None i

l i

r I

i L

I

Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged

- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged ;

G- Cumulative Goal J 785 800-l GOOD 5 :

C 600- !

u :

r i 432 f 400-G---- O ---G----O - - G---@--- O--- G----O ---G---@---O

'i

, I I

i L

-Is 200- !

^

l l

0 ' '

'87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec j l 1989 :

i The gaseous radioactive waste being :

discharged to the environment is shown for :

1989. A total of 51.3 curies have been -l l released to the environment from January ;

through June of 1989. The Fort Calhoun i Station goal is 450 curies for this ;

indicator, i i

The gaseous radioactive waste being !

discharyd to the environment is calculated i every s'.x months. ,

Adverse Trend: None l

l l

t 4

+

e -r, .#. . - - . - ...---.--.-----~-,----,+-,-.--.-----..-e..,....-..-.----.-.-m-_. -e--,-,---.r.e,-----...--wre--w-w.ww-.*---e

1 l

i i

g ,: ,

Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged i F

- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged l G- Cumulative Goal l 228 231 250-o.. .e.. . o... o ... o ...o ...o ...e .. e... e.. . o.. . o l 180 200- ;

u :

r 150- GOOD !

i !

' 1llC' e 100- + l s i 50- I t

'86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Ma Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec !

i 1989 ,

192 g a 200- l 1 f 132 150-E 11f !

o1f 100- ;

i no1 1o snu i i se 50- ;

l n l l .

f t oe I li II ;I i ;

} '86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l 1989 l

The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to l the environment is shown for 1989. The liquid i radicactive waste that was discharged to the ;

environment totaled 78.8 curies and 83.7 billions i of gallons of liquid effluent (radioactive liquid !

waste plus dilut1on water) from January through j June 1989. ;

The high amount of waste that was discharged i during the month of May was due to the dilution of

coolant for the maintenance outage that occurred ,

in May. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1989 is ;

225 curies. ;

The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Adverse Trend None 46

,.,-+,e-------..w...-,,,y..-_.-----,,,-,,---.-,,--m--~.em..-mv-i-.e---------... . , - - - - - - - . . . - .__v-r^

F V i' e i l' >

10- {

- Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts !

I F

l

g. j

~

i G000 l P 6- + !

e r I i c -

e !

! 4- !

i l- !

2- l L

l l 0 -

l Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep !

1988 1989 i l

i i

AMOUNT OF WORK CN H1tl AWAITING PARTI !

(NDl-0,TABE)

This procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non-outage, maintenance ;

items that are on hold awaiting parts, to j the total amount of open, non-outage, ;

maintenance items, expressed as a !

pdrcentage, e The percentage of work on hold awaiting i parts increased to 5.0% in September. This :

increase is due to a high number of MWO's :

that were written requiring parts. These i MWO's were written during the forced !

outage that occurred in September. l l !

As of September 30, 1989, there were a i

total of 1,130 open, non-outage, L maintenance items with 50 of these items on hold awaiting parts.

l N Adverse Trend: None >

l l

1 3

- Spare Parts Inventory Value N .

d

, 7 n

s f . _

0 0

, 6-a r

s 5

-Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989

$ PARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of September, 1989 was reported as $7,379,000.

Adverse Trend' None L

L L

l lr

i i

500 T

- Spare Parts issued I k- t e i u 400- !

s /

a -

i I

d s

m. :

i e !

f I 200-t o I o i 1 --

100-1 l

I

l r -

l t

8 i 0 l Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep l 1988 1989 i i

l l

1 i

SPARE PARTS ISSUED I t

The value of the spare parts issued for the !

l Fort Calhoun Station during August, 1989, l

totaled $163,960. i i

{ The value of the spare parts issued during !

September, 1989, totaled $396,519.

(

Adverse Trendt None l t

l

,. ..----,.,%...w - , , . -...-.m.-. , , . , ,__,...w-..m....... -,,___--..---.-._...-,..-,..-_.-..-.__........---.---.. . - .

'l I* - Total Modification Packages Open 640

)

600-l

)

500-l 425 _

j _

400 r l l

l ll

'86 '87 '88 M-200 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 t

t i OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS I

i The total number of outstanding modifications i increased by one during the month of September. ,

t MTFG1tY JUL 89 AUG 89 SEP 89 !

r ors PC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 93 89 87 i Mod Requests Being Reviewed 170 169 157 :

Desi n Engr. Back og 0 0 0 t Desi n Entr. In Progress 72 73 80 !

44 44 47 ConsructionBacklog/InProgress n Ener. Uodate Backloa In Proaress Adverse Trend None ;

i l

s l Temporary Electrical Modifications M 60 6- Temporary Nechanical Modifications

-o , , ,

Nd ui

. o f 40-Ie b "'h ---- A ,,_ $-- ~~ t ' %

'

20 N ,. 8 of fo

" 0 s Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 l

M July 1989 !

M August 1989 l l gl30- l l September 1989 l ui ;

o f 20-0- - - - --

0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 > 12 i

l A9e in Months i

l "

MPORUtY N01 IUTL StS ;

L:XCLU)ING SWF10 03)

The top graph, ""%r of T-orary M>difications, displays a monthly trend of installed electr' cal and mechan' cal temporary modifications. There was a i

total of 31 electrical jumpers and 31 temporary mechanical jumpers existing in the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of September,1989. ,

The botton graph, Ano of Temocrarv N:difications, displays the age of all :

electrical and mechan cal temporary mod ficat< ons by months installed in the plant.

l Mverse T end: Temporary modifications continue to increase due to the age ';

o" the p' ant, discovery of design basis discrep6ncies, the length of time required to resolve design discrepancies, and the need for outage conditions to resolve many items currently being satisfied with temporary modifications. The decrease in the number of temporary modifications is i expected due to greater awareness and control of the number and types of temporary modifications currently in the plant. New procedures, such as -

GEI-60, are also being established to decrease the number of temporary modifications.

12 - Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate 10- ;

j F

r e 8-q .

u . :

e l

" 6- l 1 .

l R 5 l

>. a 4- l

< t t e - ;

1.7 l'8 l'8 2-0

'86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 Rates for 1986, 1989 f 1987, and 1988 6 are shown for the month of September :

RELORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE j

Arecordableinjur5 Division personne case are is reported injured on ifthe Nuclear Production job and require I corrective medical treatment. The recordable cases frequency !

rate is computed on a year-to-date basis. !

There were 2 recordable injury cases reported for the month of :

September. There have been e total of 10 recordable injury ;

cases so far in 1989. The 2 recordable injury cases reported -

during September raised the Recordable Injury Frequency Rate from 2.5 in August to 2.7 in September.

There were eleven recordable cases reported in 1988, eight reported in 1987, and four reported in 1986.

Adverse " rend: The recordable injury frequency rate for the Fort Calaoun Station was reported as 2.7 for the month of .

September. The increasing frequency rate is due to 8 recordable injury cases that have been reported in 1989. One recordable injury occurred in March one recordable injury occurred in May, two recordable injuries occurred in June, four recordable l injuries occurred in August, and two recordable injuries occurred in September.

l L

)

i L, !

i 1 i

i

- Minor Injury Reports Filed Per Month l

+ 30- l L. i l

25- ;

i M -

1 i i A n 20- ;

o :

r i

15-

l n . ;

j !

u 10- i r ;

i -

l 5-f O I Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1989 !

MINOR INJUE.U$1Lffa_tEli.TE The Minor Injury Cases per Month indicator ,

shows the number of minor injur

month involving OPPD employees. y cases each l :

1 i l During the month of September 1989 there ;

were a total of 10 minor Injury cases !

reported. There have been a total of 78 minor injury cases reported in 1989.

Adverse Trend: The number of minor injuries have increased from 4 reported in June to 8 reported in July, 14 reported in August, and ;

10 reported in September.

I ',

.it'-

Licensee Event Reports l l Personnel Errors Reported in LERs

- Cumulative Licensee Event Reports l Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs !

t 50- 1 46 !

39 40- !

l 30- l 26 t i

20- i

~

10- y 5 i 0

- K - '

'86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l 1989 !

I i

NLDSEf CF PERSC4dlEL ERRORS -

REP @TED I ( .ER'S The Licensee Event Reports (LERs) are reported for the month that they are submitted to the NRC. ;

In September, 1989 there were four LER's

submitted. Two of these LER's were '

attributable to personnel arror. ,

There have been 27 LERs reported so far in 1989 with only 10 attributable to personnel errors. !

t Adverse Trend None -

~

v- --,--+-.,,,,,,,,___,.,,-,,.,,e...w,,,,n,., _ . , , - _ _ _ , _ _ . - _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ ..__.____ --___ ____ ---.

-r

~

[ ,

1 i

I I [']NuclearDivisionsTurnoverRate

- OPPD Corporate Turnover Rate ;

5 l

T 4-u l r -

n o 3-y r

2 R

a . .

I t

e 1-I

0 l

Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality ,

Division Division and !

Environmental j Affairs g

PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATF l The turnover rate for three Nuclear Divisions is shown for the last twelve months.

l The personnel turnover rate is plotted ,

against the OPPD corporate turnover rate of l L 4.0%. This OPPD corporate turnover rate is L based on the turnover rate over the last three years.

Adverse' Trend: The increase in the turnover ,

rate for the Quality and Environmental ;

i Affairs Division was due to one resignation J during the month of September. l l.

l :

- 55- l L l

. . - . , . . - - - - . - - , - . - - ---.,v.,--.--,--,-r..---n.--n,r,,,-.. --,- , --,. ,,n-, --,-x-. --- - -

t 600- Actual Staffing ;

i 537 L_J Authorized staffing :

482 i i

l p 400- !

e i r j s '

o -

n

l

201 216 1 200- '

l 45 45 I 0 .

Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Quality '

l Division Division and '

l Environmental Affairs ;

STAFFING LEVEL ,

The authorized and actual staffing levels -

are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.

Adverse Trend None 1

t 6

I i l L_J SRO Initial Exam )

SRO Requalification Exam l

100- 1 r

I l

l 80-

i. j

j. P i

60- -

S ,

R a ;

}40- i o

20-l~ '

l 1

0.-

l 1987 1988 1989 l

l SR0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO ;

There were three Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) ,

exams taken in September.

OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED !

Initial Exam Requal Exam Initial Exas Requal Exam DATE % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO March 87 - -

100 100 ,

June 87 - - -

100 !

February 88 - 80 - -

March 88 - 100 100 67 .

April 88 - 100 - -

July 88 - - 100 -

April 89 - - -

67 May 89 - 100 - -

September 89 100 - - -

AdverseTren(: None

O R0 Initial Exam E R0 Requalification Exam 100-i 80-l P

a 5 60- t 5 !

1 R - )

a S k 40- l 0 I l

20 No l

Requal ,

l' Exams ;

l Taken r l 0-

! 1937 1988 1989 l

t l

R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO l.

There were three Reactor Operator (RO) exams '

taken in September.

1 i

OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED !

Initial Exas Requal Exam Initial Exam Requal Exam j

% PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO DATE l June 87 - - 100 -

l l :

February 88 - 100 - -

March 88 -

100 100 100 ;

July 88 - - 100 -

l April 89 - - 100 100 May 89 -

100 - - t September 89 100 - - -

Adverse Trend None l l

} f t l' l

4<

E R0 Hot License Exams Administered f"'"1 R0 Hot License Exams Passed N l u 3- j m ;

b l e )

r ,

o 2- <

l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec !

1989 l l u L .

R0_MI LICEILSE. EXAMS !

i The R0 Hot License Exams indicator shows the 'i number of R0 Hot License exams or quizzes !

taken and passed each month. i During the month of September.1989, three !

exams were administered and passed. j Adverse Trend None i

I i

1 :

1 l

l l

1 I

l M Hotlines Initiated l 50- E Hotlines Closed ms n n er 4 Ms 45- i E Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks ,

g 40-a I b 35- '

e

' 30- l o

f 25- . : !

N

, 20- ,

f t ! !

o.; i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 l f

i l Il01UE1 [

This indicator shows the number of Hotlines !

initiated during the reporting month, the l number of Hotlines closed during the ,

reporting month, the number of Hotlines that

remain open and are less than four weeks :

old, and the number of Hotlines that remain r open and are older than four weeks old. [

During the month of September,1989, there were 13 Hotlines initiated, 11 Hotlines !

closed, 11 Hotlines that remained open and ;

j; were less than four weeks old, and 3 '

l- Hotlines that remained open and were older :

than four weeks old. !

l Adrarse Trend None !

I L ..--.-...--.--_---..----...:

s e 4 P16nned Classroom Hours y(D c R Actual Classroom Hours T

h 3 o

u i s

a-n d

s 2- l 0 l f

. l H j o t u l- i r i s j l

0 l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Mcy Dec j 1989 i

CLASSROOM (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS ,

This indicator displays the number of planned i classroom hours and the number of actual classroom !

hours for the Fort Calhoun Station. ;

The planned classroom hours for January and February {

are low because Maintenance and General Employee i Training were not figured into the schedule for f these months.

l This indicator is one month behind the reporting i month due to the time to collect and process the -

needed information.

Adverse Trend None ;

1' :

l l

l I 1

_ _ - _ - - - - . _ _ _._.- _ _ _____.___-._, . . , . - . . , _ - - . . . . , . - . - __.__-.,---n,-.,-_n_

, ___-...m,__..-r

L l

l OperatiCns !

25 E Maintenance l

@ Chemistry and Radiation Protection !

E Technical Support l E General Employed Training l T 20- E Other j h !

e u i s

l a 15- !

n i d !

s !

t u ~ me l

r 5 ni -

, s .. : -

{

t 0 +

L Jan Feb flaf Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec !

1989 !

TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, ;

Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, i General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.

l This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time l needed to collect and evaluate the data. !

Total Hours !

TRAINING JULY L989 AUGUST 1989 !

Operations 2,L84 1,983 Maintenance 1,820 2,186 Chemistry and 2,753 1,352 Radiation Protection .

Technical Support 1,543 3,187 !

General Employee Training 3,094 2,512 ;

'h I

rotal 122 11,516 360 11,582 i Adverse Trend: None 1 ,

- Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours e- Fort Calhoun Goal 14 15-j GOOD II*I 10.6 +

9-

, e.... _o ....e....o....o l

....o...o...g._o[...-

N ]

L 6- ;

i-l i

3-l i

0 i

'86 '87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec !

1989 j i

VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC l violations cited in inspection reports per :

1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator !

was calculated using the number of !

violations and the number of ins i hours from the months of December,pection 1988, i through September, 1989.

The violations per 1000 inspection hours l indicator was reported as 8.6 for the month !

of September, 1989.

l There were zero violations cited for the I month of August. There have been a total of l 21 violations cited with 2,220 inspection ;

hours in 1989. /&

The goal for the number of violations per '

l 1000 inspection hours is less than 8.6.

l Adverse Trend None t

l l

i

- Total Outstanding DR/QR's l l l- Outstanding DR/QR's > Six Months Old l l Dutstanding DR/QR's That Are Modification Related l

200- !

~

150- !

I D

R -

i

/ :

!100-Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 1988 1939 OUTSTANDING DEFICIENCY AND OUALITY REPORTS -

This indicator shows the total number of i orts !

outstanding (DR/QR's), the Deficiency number ofand outstanding Quality RepDR /QR's ,

that are greater than six months old, and the :

number of outstanding DR/QR's that are modification related. :

As of the snd of September,1969 there were ,

168 outstanding DR/QR's reports, $5 DR/QR's

that are greater t5an six months old, and 9 DR/QR's that are modification related. l Adverse Trend None

...+..-,.......-._e...-. ..-.-___._,m.m_ _ ___ _ _ _ , _ _ , . . _ _ _ _ _ _ , . _ - - - - - , - . _ ~ . _ _ _ _ - - _ __ ..-~r.--r-

~

1988 OPPD SIGIIFICANT WC OPPD SIMIFICART MC SALP FMCTIGIAL NtEA DR/Gt ' Gt/Gt VIM.ATI M LER'S _R/M M/S Vtm ATr m areeS j A. Plant Operations 38 1 8 11 2 0 7 1 (1)

8. Radiological Controls 53 0 5 1 22 1 1 l' ~'

y l C. Maintenance / 58 2 3 16 104 (6) 3 (1) 1 9 i

Surveillance O. E . ,,...;y 11 0 0 1 8 0 0 0

Preparedness l E. Security 49 0 10 11 25(12) 0 5 9 (2)

i i F. Engineering / 30 1 2 3 74 (19) 2 6 6 (1) i Technical l Support 4

t l G. Safety Assessment / 110 0 10- 3 64 (5) 0 1 0 l Quality

Verification j $

H. Mhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 i l Total 349 4 38 46 299(42) 6 (1) 21 27 (4)

DR/Gt'S ISSUED VERSUS SIliRIFICART R/Gt'S VERSUS IBIC VIB.ATIONS ISSIED VUtSUS LER'S IIEPGtTED

, The above matrix shows the muu6er of Deficiency Reports (OR's) and Quality Reports (@'s)

! issued by the Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs Division versus the W of Significant DR/St's issued by the Quality Assurance and Regulatory Affairs Olvision ;

versus the number of violations issued by the Reclear Regulatory Ceaurission (IstC) for the !

Fort Calhoun Station in 1988 and 1989. Included in this table is the number of Licensee !

j Event Reports (LER's) issued by the station each year. l

! i Significant DIt/@'s are conditions or characteristics which indicate areas dich are t repeatedly identified, widespread noncompliance (s), conditions outside of the design ;

basis, and conditions that would endanger the health and welfare of the pubite.- l

, In Sept.:mber, 1989, there were 42 DIt/gt's issued,1 Significant BR/Ot issued, O INIC i l violations, and 4 LER's issued. The monthly distribution of OR/St's, Significant OR/qR's, .

IstC violations, and LER's are shoun in ;%W_,a. !

[.

li ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT HISTORY Escalated enforcement includes level III, II, and I violations-

~

issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for deficiencies

' discovered at the Fort Calhoun Station. Escalated enforcement also

, includes civil penalties which are usually assessed with level III

and higher violations. Listed below is the escalated enforcement history for the Fort Calhoun Station.

b' ESCALATED ENFORCEMENT

1. February 1985 Site Security - Multiple Level IV and V Violations that were escalated to a Level III.

A civil penalty of $21,425 was assessed.

2. April 1986 Qualification of Electrical Ponetrations - Level III Violation.

No civil penalty was assessed.

3. May 1986 Radiological Protection - Level III Violation.

L No civil penalty was assessed.

4. December 1996 Physical Security - Level IV Violation.

A civil penalty of $15,000 was assessed.

5. January 1987 Lack of Adequate Safety Evaluation for Emergency Modification - Level III Violation.

A civil pensity of $50,000 was assessed.

6. January 1988 Unlocked High Radiation Doors and Lack of Health !

Physics Coverage to Very High Radiation Areas - !

Lavel III Violation. l A civil penalty of $75,000 was u wssed.

7. February 1988 Design Evaluation, Design Impleaientation and l Classification / Reporting, and Corrective Action of j Water Intrusion into the Ins.,ument Air System - 3 <

Level III Violations.

A civil penalty of $175,000 was assessed. j

8. May 1988 Unlocked Ver High Radiation Door and deficiencies identified in the Radiological Protection Program - 2 Level III Violations. <

A civil penalty of $112,500 was assessed. )

f i

I J

1

o j

[

ESCALATEDENFORCCMENTHISTORY(CONTINUED)

9. October 1988 A missing cap on a 3/8 inch containment line, SIRWT check valve test failures and Safety AnalysisforOperability-1.evelIIIviolation.

A civil penalty of $50,000 was assessed.

10. October 1988 Errors in Cycle 11 Setpoint Analysis and incorrect information submitted in a response.

No civil penalty was assessed, t t

4 e

i l-1 i

(' ? !

Li i.

i f.

l, l 1 <

r

1 ENFORCEMENT CONFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS Enforcement conferences are held with the NRC on potential higher level '

violations. Listed below are the recent enforcement conferences and

. management meetings held with the NRC.

I RECENT ENFORCEMENT.COMFERENCES AND MANAGEMENT MEETINGS

1. August 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC L

in August. One meeting was held to discuss the l

secur,ty program while another meeting was held on l the OPPD independent appraisal results. ,

1 L 2. October 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC f in October. One meeting. was held concerning the security program while another meeting was held to L discuss the training program and the radiation -

protection program.

3. November 1988 Two management meetings were held with the NRC in ,

November. One meeting was held concerning the Safety.

Enhancement Program while another was held to discuss Decay Heat Removal. t

4. January 1989 One management meeting. was held with the NRC in i January. This meeting was held concerning the new Site Security Plan. -

5. February 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC ~ in '

February. This Enforcement Conference was held '

concerning the Radiological Protection Program.

6. February 1989 One mar,agement meeting was held with the NRC in February. This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Eniancement Program. .

7. April 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in A)ril. This management meeting was held concerning -

l tle Safety Enhancement Program.

8. May 1989 One management meeting was held with the NRC in May.

This management meeting was held concerning the Safety Enhancement Program.

9. July 1989 One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in L July. This Enforcement Conference was held :

concerning auxiliary feedwater pump FW-10 controller '

operability.

l- ,

One Enforcement Conference was held with the NRC in

10. August 1989 August. This Enforcement Conference was held concerning various security problems.

L I 1

_ _ . _ ._ __ . ._. ~_ __ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ __ _ _.

i f

p' ,

SIGNIFICANT ITEMS OF INTEREST This section is intended to provide information on events which.are ,

l' significant to the Fort Calhoun Station and will give a " heads-up" ,

p' look at what is scheduled in the coming months. I 1>

L' l

l -

The Fort Calhoun Station went critical on January 29, p 1989 at 9:27 a.m. following the 1988 Refueling l Outage, i

?

The Fort Calhoun Station went on-line on January 31, !

1989 at 4:46 p.m. following the 1988 Refueling !

Outage.' ,

L -

The 1990 refueling outage is scheduled for' February, 15, 1990. '

l' -

INP0 Assist Visits are planned for the near future concerning two groups, These groups include the Planning Group and the O Review Group. Currently,perating no c Experience and ates have been dm.rmined for these visits. . ,

An exit meeting with the NRC is scheduled for October 20,1989, concerning the validation and verification of Safety. Enhancement Program (SEP) Items.

- An inspection to review accomslishments to date in ,

the area of Probabilistic Risc Assessment (PRA) is :

! scheduled to start October 23, 1989. 4 l

l -

The 1990 INP0 Plant Assessment is scheduled to start l on June 18, 1990.

On September 13,1989, the lant Reactor Protection i'

System (RPS) displayed a 2% d viation on AT power.

1'

- A Safety and Review Committee (SARC) assessment and followup actions were in progress at the end of Septeaber.

l l

l '

l l

p

FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus their age in months.

l AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, non-outage )

maintenance work orders that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders.

AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The cumulative hours that the Component Cooling Water system is outside the station chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated from the first sam)1e exceeding the limit until additional sampling shows the parameter to >e back with'n limits.

CLASSR00M (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS ,

The number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station.

CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD The percentage of total outstanding maintenance items not requiring an outage, that are greater than three months old at the end of the period reported.

CRAFT WORK ACTIVITY The percentage of a type of work performed by each craft during the reported monti involving plant personnel.

DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The daily core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in thermal megawatts.

DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY A Diesel Generator (DG) unit consists of the engine, generator, combustion air system, cooling water system, fuel suppl lubricating oil system, starting air system, autostart controfs, systemmanual controls, and diesel generator breaker.

Reliability of each DG unit will be reported for two situations, one for the last 20 demands and one for the last 100 demands. Reliability is the ratio of the number of successful runs to the number of demands, for each individual DG unit.

l l

o

l. - . - . . . . . _ . _ . _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ , _ . . _ . - . . _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ - _ , _ _ , _ . _ . . . _ . .

I l'

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) i DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (CONTINUED 1 L i L A successful run is defined as a start of a DG unit and the loading of !

[~ this unit to a minimum of 50% rated load (1250 KW) for a minimum time period of 60 minutes. t A failure is defined as the failure to start, accelerate, and assume the :

design rated load for the given time period as specified for an emergency ,

i: .

or a valid test. >

The total number of demands (or valid tests) will be equal to the sum of p the failures and the successful runs. ,

This definition of DG Reliability was taken from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108 Revision 1". This is the de< inition being applied n calculating the diesel generator reliability at the Fort Calhoun Station.

DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIE ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for all utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving days away from '

work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not include contractor personnel.

DOCUMENT REVIEW l The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed during the reporting month, the nun;ber of documents scheduled for review during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are overdue. '

l EQUIPMENT FORLED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours is the inverse of the mean time between forced outages caused by eouipment failures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is critical in a period (1000 hours0.0116 days 0.278 hours 0.00165 weeks 3.805e-4 months ) divided by the number of forced outages caused by equipment failures in that period.

L l EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR -

o l- This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross available generation to pross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation s the energy that can be produced if the unit is operated at tle maximum power level permitted by equipuent and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the energy that can be produced by a unit in a given period if operated continuous'y at maximum capacity.

l i

l

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ . _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ - ~ - , _ . - ,

L FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) '

i FORCED OUTAGE RATE This indicator is defined as the percentage of time that the unit was J unavailable due to forced events compared to the time planned for l electrical poneration. Forced events are failures or other unplanned !

conditions t1at require removing the unit from service before the end of 1 the next weekend. Forced events include startup failures and events i initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., the unit is L

available but not in service. ,

l' FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR This indicator is defined as the steady-state primary coolant I-131 ,

activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to '

a common purification rate.

l Tramp uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing process.present :

Steady state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power for at least.seven days, l

GASEOUS RADIDACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous l radioactive nuclides released from the Fort Calhoun Station.

BRDSillEALBAIE Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal energy in l British Thermal Units - (BTU) produced by the reactor to the total gross l

electricalenergyproducedbythegeneratorinkilowatt-hours (KWH).

HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED 1

The amount (in Kilograms) of waste oil, non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced by the Fort Calhoun Station each month. <

l HOTLINES

\

l The number of Hotlines that are initiated, closed, overdue, and open for a given month. A Hotline is a training document sent out for imediate review. The Hotline should be reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the Hotline.

A )

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)

HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES l

Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding l guidelines during power operation. Power operation is defined as greater i than 30% power. The 13 parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation 1 conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sulfate, sodium, feed water pH, !

dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen.

IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS DUT-0F-SERVICE Total number of in-line chemistry instruments that are out-of-service in theSecondarySystemandthePostAccident.SamplingSystem(PASS).

LIOUID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays both the total volume of liquid effluent-l (radioactive liquid waste plus dilution water) and the associated Curies -

discharged from the Fort Calhoun Station to the Missouri River.

MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG The number of corrective. non-outage maintenance work orders that remain '

epen at the end of the rewrting month. This indicator was added to the Performance Indicators teport to trend open corrective non-outage i maintenance work orders as stated in Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)

Ites No. 36.

MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN This indicater is a breakdown of all open maintenance work orders by

several. categories.

I MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The percentage of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel.

l L MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE The total maximum amount of Gamma and Neutron (Whole Body) radiation received by an individual person working at the Fort Calhoun Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis.

- MINOR INJURY CASES PER MONTH The number of minor injury cases (short-form cases) involving GPPD employees.

-- .ww.,-. . . - - - . . . , . . . . , . . - .,- n-. , . _ . . _ . . _ - . _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . _ . _ . _ _ _ _ ,

l J

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) 1 NLMBER CF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS i S BMITTE )

]

The data failures. plotted is the number The suspected NPRDSof suspected anddesignated failures are confirmed NPRDS as suchcomponent on the applicable equipment Maintenance Work Order. J NPROS is the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group program which has been outlined by INPO and ,

implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station.

AiuttlER OF DUT .0F-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform its design function is ;

considered as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had a 4 Maintenance the end of theWork Order (MWO)iod reporting >er is considered out-of-service and will bewritten fo counted. The duration of tie out-of-service condition is not considered.

Compute.tr CRTs are not considered as control room instruments.

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S l The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed to personnel error i on the original LER submittal. l NUMBER OF VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This ' indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspection reports for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC ins)ection .

hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspect on was actually performed and not based on when the inspection resort is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are usec as the l inspection hours.

1 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET ,

The year to date budget compared to the actual ex,..:nditures for l operations and maintenance.

DUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The number of authorized Modification Requests (MR'S) in any state i- between the issuance of a Modification Number and the completion of the !

drawing update.

Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress The Form FC-1133 has not been approved.

4 il p' .FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) g OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS (CONTINUED)

Modification Requests Being Rcviewed Nuclear Planning is reviewing these Modification Requests and will assign a year for construction to be completed or will submit an approval for cancellation.

Design Engineering Backlog Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which construction will-

,. be completed but PED has not started design work.

Design Engineering In Progress

< PED has assigned a year in which construction will be completed and design work is in progress.

Construction Backlog /In Progress The Construction Package has been issued or construction has begun but the modification has not been accepted by the System '<

Acceptance Comittee (SAC).

Design Engineering Update Backlog /In Progress PED has received the Modification Completion Report but the

. drawings have not been updated.

PERCENT OF DR/0R'S GREATER THAN SIX M0MTHS OLD This indicator displays the percentage of Deficiency Rearts (DR's) and Quality Reports (QR's) that are greater than six months o'd.

PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

Collective radiation exposure is the total external whole-body dose received by all on-site personnel (including contractors and visitors) ;

during a time period, as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter ;

(TLD).Collectiveradiationexposureisreportedinunitsofman-rem.

PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE !

The ratio of the number of turnovers to average employment. A turnover is

- a vacancy created by voluntary resignation from the company. Retirement, ;

death, termination, transfers within the company, and part-time employees (

are not considered in turnover, s

,. .- .- -- - ~ - - . . -- - ..

l FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE 1

l This. indicator is defined as the percentage of preventive maintenance items in the month that were not completed by the scheduled date plus a grace period equal to 25 percent of the scheduled interval.

PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The . percent of hours out of limit are for six parameters divided by the total number of hours possib1rimary chemistry e for the month.

The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved L 0xygen, Fluoride, and Suspended Solids. EPRI' limits are used.

1 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

The number of identified incidents, the number of opened incidents, and the number of closed incidents each month involving maintenance.

RATIO 0F HIGHEST PRIORITY MWO'S TO TOTAL MWO'S COMPLETED 1

This indicator'is non-outage, correctivedefinedmaintenance as the ratio of work theorders number of highest (priority 4 or p)riority, 5 to the total number of non-outage, corrective maintenance work orders comoleted, expressed as a percentage.

RATIO 0F PREVENTIVE TQ TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance testing and calibration procedures) to the sum of non-outage corrective maintenance 4 and preventive maintenance completed over the reporting period. The ratio, expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-hours.

RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE)

The number of injuries requiring more than noraal first aid per 200,000 manhours worked.

R0 HOT LICENSE EXAMS '

^

l This indicator shows the number of R0 Hot License exams or quizzes taken and passed for the month they were taken.

R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC Reactor Operator (RO) license examination to the total number of candidates taking examinations.

- . -. - ~ - - - . - . . - . - - _ . - - - -. - - - . .

l FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED)

S CONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a calculation based on the I concentration of' key impurities in the . secondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the most likely cause of ceterioration of the steam generators. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the period of time greater than 30 percent power. -

The following equation is how the CPI is calculated:

CPI ='((Ka/1.2)+(Na/20),+(C1/20)+($0/20)+(0/10))/5 4 2 Where the following parameters are monthly averages of; '

Ka = Steam Generator Blowdown Cation Conductivity Na = Steam Generator Blowdown Sodium Concentration i, C1 = Steam Generator Blowdown Chloride Concentration .

50 Steam Generator Blowdown Sulfate Concentration l- 4 =

= Concensate Pump Discharge Dissolved Oxygen Concentration 02 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The dollar value of the spare parts inventory at the end of the reporting period.

SPARE PARIS ISSUED The dollar value of the s)are parts issued for the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting perioc .

SRO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO l- ,

The ratio of station candidates passing both the oral and written NRC Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) license examination to the total number of candidates taking examinations.

TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the plant's rf items. ;

Temporary configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the P&ID, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams.

1

FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) ,

[

T[MPORARY MODIFICATIONS ICONTINUED)

Jumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or !

O mrating Procedures are not considered as temporary modifications unless tw jumper or block remains in place after the test or procedure is complete. Jumpers.and blocks installed in test or lab instruments are not .

L considered as temporary modifications. Scaffolding is not considered a :

l temporary modification. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for , , .

L which EEAR's have been submitted, will be considered as a temporary i

! modifications until final resolution of the EEAR and the jumper or block j is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings.

TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING ;

i The total number of student hours of training for Operations, ,

Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. i TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS l Reportable skin and clothing contaminations above background levels greater than 5000 dpe/100 cm squared.

L UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned automatic scrams that occur while the reactor (reactor protection is critical. systemislogic The indicator actuations)d further define as follows:

l

- Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test or evolution.

UNPLANNED REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL (CONTINUED 1

- Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious. ;

- Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation ,

of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of the sensors monitoring plant parameters and conditions, rather than the manual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control room.

- Critical means that during the steady-state condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the effective multiplication factor (keff)wasequaltoone.

L

g; FORTCALHOUNPERFORMANCEPARAMETERDEFINITIONS(CONTINUED) l 1

i I f

l UNPLANNED Sa.ETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS L This indicator is' defined as the sum of the following safety system actuations:

the number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) l actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint ;

or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal L -

the number of unplanned emergency AC power system actuations L

that result from a loss of power to a safeguards bus L

An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint I t; for a safety (system is generated ECCS only)is reached and major or when a spurious equipment or inadvertent in the system signal is actuated.

L Unplanned means that the, system actuation was not part of a planned test l or evolution.

.l The ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure injection system, or the safety injection tanks.

VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE i

This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste produced, in final form ready for burial, during a given period. It ,

is calculated using the amount of waste actually shipped for dis >osal, l plus the change in inventory of waste in on-site storage in fina' form '

i- ready for burial. The volume of radiosctive waste that is not yet in l final form ready for shipment is not included. Low-level solid l radioactive waste - t;onsists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and '

L evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation I

and maintenance. Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of <

spent fuel processing.

i :

BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1989 PEkFORMANCE INDICATOR GOAL 1 This section will explain the basis used in establishing the 1989 performance goals.

FORCED OUTAGE RATE AND EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR L The Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF) goals have been established from 1989 to 1992. The following table is a breakdown of the hours allotted for each category over the next five l years. .

STARTUP l- GENERATOR FORCED OUTAGE

' PLANNED ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR Xf,88, (HOURSi (HOURS) (HOURSI (HOURS _) (HOURS) .(Al ,(Al 1989(**) 7783 168 172 737 8760 84.4 2.1 L

1990(*) 7036 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1991(*) 7036 168 172 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1992 8520 240 0 0 8760 92.9 2.7

(**)The1988RefuelingOutagecontinuedintoJanuary,1989 ;

(*) Refueling Outage Years UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL ,

The 1989 goal for Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical has '

been set at one. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic l

reactor scram in the past three years of operation.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1989 has been established at zero. The Fort Calhoun Station has not had an unplanned safety system actuation in the last five years.

GROSS HEAT RATE l

! The 1989 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at 10,500 BTU /KWH. This heat rate goal is based on the 1988 goal of 10,075 BTU /KWH less 20.6 MW(e) stated in memo TS-FC-83-233H, written on July 17, 1983. This states that operation without the governing stage of the turbine results in a gross electrical output loss of 20.6 MW(e).

I BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1989 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR GOALS (CONTINUED)

FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The 1989 Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) goal has been set at 1.0 nanocuries/ ram. This level allows for ap>roximately one to two fuel in failures. A though Cycle 11 was completec without any apparent fuel in 1 failures, there are a number of ANF assemblies entering into a third or I fourth cycle of operation. When a fuel pin has been used for three or ,

four fuel cycles there is an increased probability of fuel failure. The Failed Fuel Action Plan, Standing Order 0-43, allows for approximately four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels.

PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

The 1989 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 130 man-rem.

This goal was based on 50 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the month of January,1989, and approximately 7.5 man-rem of cumulative exposure for the months of February, 1989, through December, 1989.

t VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE The 1989 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 6,000 cubic feet. This goal was based on a reconenendation made by the Fort Calhoun ALARA Comunittee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Production Division.

DISABLING INJURY FRE00ENCY RATE t

L The Disabling Injury Frequency Rate 1989 goal has been set at 0.31. This '

l goal allows for one lost time accident in the Nuclear Production Division during 1989.

J FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES l PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE !

EVENT FROM - TO (MWH) (MWH) l Cycle 1 09/26/73 - 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 I First Refueling 02/01/75 - 05/09/75 !

Cycle 2 05/09/75 - 10/01/76 3,853,322 7.152,961 Second Refueling. 10/01/76 - 12/13/76 i Cycle 3.- 12/13/76 --09/30/77- 2,805,927 9,958,888 Third Refueling 09/30/77'- 12/09/77 j

Cycle 4 12/09/77'- 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 Fourth Refueling 10/14/78 - 12/24/78 Cycle 5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 Fifth Refueling' 01/18/80 - 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 I Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 l Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 Eighth Refueling 03/03/84 - 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 - 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86 1

Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646

)

Tenth Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88 - 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 - 02/15/90*

Twelfth Refueling 02/15/90*- 05/11/90* I Cycle 13 l 05/11/90*- 09/01/91*

- Planned Dates i

0: ; '

, l 4

l FORT CALHOUN STATION i PRODUCTION AND DPERATION RECORDS The following seven items are the current production and operation -l

" records" for the Fort Calhoun Station.

+

1 II l' First' Sustained Reaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . August 5,1973'(5:47p.m.)

2. First Electricity Supplied to the System . . . . . August 25, 1973 !

3.CommercialOperation.(180,000 KWH)........ September 26, 1973 .

4.AchievedFullPower(100%)............May4,1974 f 5.LongestRun-(477 days)............... June 8,1987-Sept.27,1988- j 6.HighestMonthlyNetGeneration(364,468,800KWH).0ctober1987 7.MostProductiveFuelCycle(4,936,859 MWH).... June 8 1987 - Sept. 27, 1988 (Cyce11) i i

l.

3 I. '

l I

f t

, ,- --,--,--.-,-,,---,---.---...----------.--,...--r,-- --e

1 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCES .

+; PERFORMANCE INDICATOR MANAGER / INDIVIDUAL Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders Peterson/Shrum !

Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts Peterson/McCormick Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits Jaworski/Henning Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Newhouse Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old Peterson/Shrum Craft Work Activity Peterson/Shrum .

Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray Decontaminated Auxiliary Building Peterson/Christensen Diesel Generator Reliability DG Log Disabling Injury Frequency Rate Sorensoit/Skaggs i

Document Review Petotson/McKay DR/QRs Issued Versus NRC Violations Issued Orr/Krieser Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray !

Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Kulisek Forced Outage Rate Holthaus/ Gray Fuel Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lofshult Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz i Gross Heat Rate Holthaus/ Gray l Hazardous Waste Produced Schmidt/Sayre Hotlines Gasper /Kobunski In-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Schmidt/Renaud -

Liquid Radioactive Waste Discharged to the Environment Jaworski/Stultz ,

MaintenanceWorkOrderBacklog(CorrectiveNon-Outage) Peterson/Shrum Maintenance Work Order Breakdown Peterson/Shrum Maintenance Overtime Peterson/Shrum

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE l

(CONTINUED) 1 Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Peterson/Mattice t

Minor Injury Cases per Month Peterson/McFadden

]

Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Chase /Riva Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Peterson/Trausch .l t

Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs LER File Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Orr/Krieser ,

Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner Percent of DR/QR's Greater Than Six Months Old Orr/Krieser L PersonnelRadiationExposure(Cumulative) Peterson/Mattice Personnel Turnover Rate Jaworski/Yager Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue Peterson/Cagle 'i Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits Jaworski/Henning ProceduralNoncomplianceIncidents(Maintenance) Peterson/ Smith Ratio of Highest Priority MW0s to Total MW0s Completed Peterson/Shrum ,

Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Peterson/Shrum Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs -

L R0 Hot License Exams Gasper / Herman R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Herman Secondary System Chemistry Jaworski/Henning Spare Parts Inventory Turnover Ratio Steele/ Miser Spare Parts Inventory Value Steele/Huliska SRO License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Herman Staffing Level Jaworski/Yager .

{

1 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE. i I

(CONTINUED)-

Temporary Modifications Jumper Log i

e Total' Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse l 1

Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations Peterson/Christensen I

Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical Holthaus/ Gray l Unplanned Safety System Actuations Holthaus/ Gray !

1 Volume of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste Peterson/Bilau .l r

t jc ;

a' -

1 i

s-t i

1, 4

1 s

I

1. _ ._ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ - . _ _ - . _ . . . _ _ _ . . _ . _ _

REFERENCES ;

INP0 Good Practices 0A-102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" ,

IEEE Standard 762, "IEEE Trial' Use Standard Definitions for Use in '

Reporting Generating Unit Reliability, Availability and Productivity" L

l

.INP0 Report Dated November 1984, " Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission " Regulatory Guide 1.108 :

l h

I 1

l l- l 1

L L

l' 1

. . . - . . . . - . . - - . . .

ML19325E052

Text

Navigation menu

Search