ML19322D346
| ML19322D346 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Surry  |
| Issue date: | 01/23/1970 |
| From: | US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | Boyd R US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19322D327 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-79-416 NUDOCS 8002110553 | |
| Download: ML19322D346 (1) | |
Text
,.-
g.
y
(
f'
~,
g
.a ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION i j
- WASHINGTON. D.c. 20548 H;_7
- m. = %
M l
3>
\\
- [*
me af.aJ
=
a y
.j R. S. Boyd, Assistant Director for Reactor Projects v=.i.
.i Division of Reactor Licensing (2)
- j p-d VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANT-SURRY 1 AND 2 I
CO REPORT NOS. 50-280/69-8 AND 50-281/69-8
.s.
b The enclosed report of an inspection of the subject facilities on
~
- October 28-31 and November 14, 1969, is Torwarded for information h
i l
h and possible action. The possible action item is included.in the
'~
last paragraph of this memorandum.
pf I
o e-The report describes a number of deficiencies that were identified on, h['
.~
the primary' system piping that was fabricated by Southwest Fabricating l
)
and Welding Company (SWF6WCO). The deficiencies were E ra"*A A"h fp
~
We will continue'l
_ %g.[
h j
a site receipt inspection by_ contractor personnel.
Oj to f ollow the resolution and/or disposition of th'is piping during the next inspection scheduled for February 1970.
'9 l We conducted an inspection of SWF6WCO on May 6-7, 1969, in conjunctio,n with the Diablo 1 facility, CO Report No. 275/69-5. At that time, we f
l 9
'j determined that a formalized quality assurance program had not been e,s-
,)
f I
l tablished. We plan to conduct a reinspection of SWF6WC0 during March 1970 because they are a major supplier of prefabricated piping for l
h both primary and engineered' safeguards systems at a numbe
'i p
pa under construction. This effort includes:
Qh i
/
J a.
Two contracts with Westinghouse, the first involving eight
- - plants with 25 loops, and 'the second 18 plants with 55 loops g
l with an option for four additional plants.
1 s
c(
8
.b.
One contract with General Electric for two plants.
,9 C
The report highlights a number of design problems in the electrical in-h l
strumentation area. The first problem is concerned with 'the installabic. g all electrical and instrumentation cable penetrations at a single loc'atiu
- Ej in the containment. building. The installation appears to be contrarM to 3
}
, the requirements of the proposed "IEEE Standards for Nuclear Power P1' ant Protection Systems," Revision No. 8.
The licensee believes that the l 6
separations requirements can be satisfied by judicious
- placing of cables. %
,j;-
- The second item is concerned with the installation of the two battery f l
' i banks at one end of the same room with inadequate ventilation and on1'y h
.I<.,.
. s'eparated by an eight foot high concrete block wall. This installation Eff YO F/44 Pf/
afp w A~w~ U27a.<4f4l.aw/
"pr?gto wr ) awn S forJ J,r.m m,f*dny%y) 5? ""r*Pm;yg luptm/a.
%p.
v c
o gz spypy au.
a om -
3a awpaa c fens'.ntyQd%
W'7".Yrd.tp
~
o 1
..r
.m~v...........
. 2 A'*
.s#
O.Y-L
.