ML19320D393

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-352/79-12 & 50-353/79-11
ML19320D393
Person / Time
Site: Limerick  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/26/1980
From: Grier B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Kemper J
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
Shared Package
ML16341B393 List:
References
NUDOCS 8007210312
Download: ML19320D393 (2)


See also: IR 05000352/1979012

Text

.N .

$

.

"

g$

UNITED STATES

y

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

"

{-

j

REGION I

se

g

631 PARK AVENUE

KING OF PRUS$1 A, PENNSYLVANI A 19406

.....

Docket Nos. 50-352

50-353

Philadelphia Electric Company

ATTN: Mr. John S. Kemper

Vice President

Engineering and Research

2301 Market Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Combined Inspection 50-352/79-12 and 50-353/79-11

This refers to your letter dated April 10, 1980, in response to our letter

dated March 12, 1980.

Your response to Infraction B of the " Notice of Violation" states that PECO

does not believe the situation described represents a noncompliance and

suggests that NRC may have misinterpreted the Limerick PSAR, Appendix D,

Paragraph D.4.1.

You also stated that it is PEC0's position that it is not

required that every subcontractor establish and implement his own quality

control program.

We concur that every subcontractor is not necessarily required to establish

and implement his own quality control program.

It is required that an

appropriate quality control program be applied to all safety related work.

As stated in 10 CFR 50 Appendix B Criterion I and in item B of Appendix A

to our lett6r of March 12, 1980, the authority and duties of persons and

organizations performing activities affecting the safety-related functions

of structures, systems and components shall be clearly established and

delineated in writing. Your PSAR paragraph D.4.1 basically endorses this

regulatory requirement.

Subcontractors can be under a documented contractors

QA program; however, we require that QA requirements applicable to the

subcontractor's work be clearly delineated in writing.

For the work by the block wall subcontractor this was not done.

For example,

as described in item A of Appendix A to our letter of March 12, 1980 and

your reply thereto, it appears that no procedures for control of documents

used in performing the work were required.

It also appears that a verbal

agreement was made that Bechtel would do all the inspections for the erection

of the block walls and the materials that went into the walls. The NRC

Inspector requested objective evidence from PECO in an effort to determine

what QA program was established for this subcontractor.

No such evidence

was provided.

It appears that the QA program for the work perfonned by

this subcontractor was principally a verbal one.

Reclassification of the

item of noncompliance is not appropriate.

800721039

!

.

_

_ _

_

_

_

_ ____ _ _ -__- - _

.-

~

..

,

Philadelphia' Electric Company

2

Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of

Federal Regulations requires that your reply include, among other things,

the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Your letter of April 10,

1980 did not include a specific statement in that regard concerning items A

through C,-although in some cases a date could be inferred.

In order to

preclude misinterpretation and to comply with regulatory requirements, we

request that you provide that information.

We note that further reports

are planned by you concerning item D.

In as much as your letter did not clearly indicate the causes of these

items of noncompliance, the recognition of whian is necessary for fully

effective. corrective action, our inspectors will be alert for recurrence of

similar problems in the same or other areas of construction.

Thank you for informing us of the corrective and preventive actions documented

in your letter. These actions will be examined during a subsequent inspection

of your licensed program.

Sincerely,

0

t

/

l-

&/

/

.

m.

/ .; p j c1- l'

, ,x it-oc*

Boyce H. Grier

'

Director

cc:

V. S. Boyer, Senior Vice President, Nuclear Power

.

..

e

-

-

,-p

-e-g

-

,,ws

-

m

w

-rwe r

~

-ev

W-

t