ML19319E575
| ML19319E575 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 09/27/1976 |
| From: | Cavanaugh W ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Madsen G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319E565 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004110828 | |
| Download: ML19319E575 (2) | |
Text
~-
~ - - -
n' L.u. -
(l{
E n etno uc ourto a n oc a n s a s
(}
CL:12 A R K A N S A S P O W E R & LI G H T C O.M P A N Y September 27, 1976 Reactor Construction and Operation Branch United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region IV 611 Ryan Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76012 Attention: Mr. G. L. Madsen
Subject:
Arkansas Power 6 Light Company Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit One Docket No. 50-313, License No. DPR-51 IE Inspection Report No. 50-313/76-10 Gentlemen:
~
The subject inspection report identified two violations of 10 CFR 20.
As applicable, our response to the violations includes:
(1) corrective h
steps which have been taken and results achieved; (2) corrective steps j
which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. The NRC position.on the cited violations and corresponding APSL response is provided below:
' NRC Positiion (1) Contrary to 10 CFR 20.203(c)(2), access to the following areas was not controlled on August 18, 1976. Radiation levels were such that a major portion of the body could receive in any one hour a dose in excess )f 100 millirem.
a.
Entrance to the Spent Demineralizer Room (Room 30).
b.
Entrance to the Make-up Deminaralizer Valve Gallery Room (Room 31).
~
This item is an infraction.
APSL Response (1) An inspection was made of all entrances to radiation areas. The entrances were locked and verified. The alarm system was checked out and put into operation. Trouble tickets were initiated on doors requiring additional maintenance. Periodic checks will be a
made on entrances to radiation areas.
k
)
It is our belief that we are in full compliance with the requirements v
of 10 CFR 20.203(c)(2).
nb 8004110
/O m uv~a.,~vesro ow~eo usmoen u,oots sours ur aries sysrco y
y*
( 7 U.S.N.R.C. - Mr. Madsen
()
September 27, 1976 Page Two NRC Position (2)' Contrary to 10 CFR 20.203(c)(1), the spent Fuel Demineralizer Room (Room 30) was not posted: " Caution - High Radiation Area" on August 18, 1976. Radiation levels were such that a major portion of the body could receive in any one hour a dose in excess of 100 millirem.
This is an infraction.
i APSL Response (2) The high radiation area which was not marked as such has been sur-veyed and posted as a high radiation drea. Routine radiation surveillance of plant areas is to be perfomed twice per week, as manpower pemits.
It is our belief that we are in fu11' compliance with the requirements of,10 CFR 20.203(c)(1).
1-Ve truly you i
\\
['
o n.
William Cavan h III Assistant Director, Pow r P oduction h'C:mcc i
l 8
4
.i l
l i
\\
l 1
i O
--v-.,
,,e
,,a.
m.,.--4 w---