ML19319E567
| ML19319E567 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Arkansas Nuclear  |
| Issue date: | 10/28/1976 |
| From: | Rueter D ARKANSAS POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | Madsen C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19319E565 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8004110822 | |
| Download: ML19319E567 (2) | |
Text
-
.e n eum n a eusto anonsas V
ARK ANS AS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY October 28, 1976 1-116-2 Reactor Construction and Operation Branch United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region IV 611 Ryan Drive, Suite 1000 Arlington, Texas 76012 Attention: Mr. G. L. Madsen
Subject:
Arkansas Power 6 Light Company Arkansas Nuclear One - Unit One Docket No. 50-313, License No. DPR-51 IE Inspection Report No. 50-313/76-10
(. File:
0232)
Gentlemen:
n In
..., to your letter of October 5, 1976, the following additional
(
informat._.. is supplied at your request.
The subject inspection repcrt identified two violations of 10 CFR 20.
As applicable, our response to the violations includes:
(1) corrective steps which have been taken and results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
The NRC position on the cited violations and corresponding APSL response is provided below:
NRC Position (1) Contrary to 10 CFR 20.203(c)(2), access to the following areas was e
not controlled on August 18, 1976. Radiation levels were such that a major portion of the body could receive in any one hour a dose in excess of 100 millirem.
Entrance to the Spent Demineralizer Room (Room 30).
a.
b.
Entrance to the Make-up Demineralizer Valve Gallery Room (Rcan
- 31).
APSL Response (1) An inspection was made of all entrances to radiation areas. The t
entrances were locked and verified. The alam system was checked
/O i
v/
\\
8004110 I M a
[d USNRC - Mr. Madsen October 28, 1976 Page Two out and put into operation. Trouble tickets were initiated on doors requiring additional maintenance. Daily checks will be made on entrances to high radiation areas.
It is our belief that we are in full compliance with the require-ments of 10 CFR 20.203(c)(2).
NRC Position (2) Contrary to 10 CFR 20.203(c)(1), the Spent Fuel Demineralizer Room (Room 30) was not posted:
" Caution - High Radiation Area" on August 18, 1976.
Radiation levels were such that a major portion of the body could receive in any one hour a dose in excess of 100 millirem.
This is an infraction.
APSL Response (2) 'Ihe high radiation area which was not marF4d a :vch has been sur-veyed and posted as a high radiation area. Routine iadiation sur-O veillance of high radiation areas will be performed weekly.
It is our belief that we are in full compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 20.203(c)(l';.
Very tntly yours,
/
/
f Don Rueter Manager, Licensing DR:mcc 1
l
~
l
[
l
_-.