ML19317G184

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Notice of Violation from Insp on 720509-12,24-26 & 0612
ML19317G184
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/24/1972
From: Jennifer Davis
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Rodgers J
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
Shared Package
ML19317G178 List:
References
NUDOCS 8002280819
Download: ML19317G184 (3)


Text

.

A ri

]- )

\\ [f\\.

UNITED STATES -

~

ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION x.-

'g

(

REGION tl - SulTE SIS g

230 P E ACHT R EE ST R EET, NORT HwEST TELapwont: 4404) 824 4SC3 Qifl 4%

AT t. A NT A. GECRGI A 30303 DIRECTORATE OF REGULATORY OPERATIONS In Reply Refer To:

July 2h, 1972

~

RO:II:RFW 50-302/72-2 l.

Florida Power Corp. ration Attn:

Mr. J. T.-Rodgers s

Assistant Vice President and Nuclear Project Manager 3203 34th Street South P. O. Box lh042 St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted by R. F. Warnick on May 9-12, 1972, and by R. F. Warnick and E. J. Vallish on May 24-26, 1972, of the activities authorized by AEC Construction Permit No. CPPR-51' for the Crystal River 3 facility, and to the discussions held with Mr. H. L.

Bennett and other members of your staff at the conclusion of the in-spection and to the discussion held on June 12, 1972, by me and members of my staff with Messrs. Rodgers, Hancock and Kleinman in St. Petersburg.

Areas examined during this inspection included pressurizer valves, reactor. building spray rumps, reactor coolant bleed. tanks, decay heat piping and equipment, reactor building tendons, reactor building equip-ment hatch, concrete work, electrical work, and the quality control system for velding and piping work. Other areas examined included quality surveillance audits, personnel changes, tiaining, and access to working level personnel. Within these areas, the inspection con-sisted of selective examinations of procedures, inspection records, heat treatment records, the incoming quality material log, nonconformance and corrective action reports, interviews with plant personnel, discus-sions with utility management, and observations by the inspectors.

Previous correspondence dated March 30, 1972, indicated that certain documentation would be reviewed when available onsite. During this in-spection, the heat treatment records for the reactor building equipment hatch were reviewed and the inspector has no further questions.

In addition, tre vould like to acknowledge receipt of the last two of the four quality control / quality assurance manuals requested in correspond-

~I ence dated January 27, 1972.

8o02 280 D 1

V

r. m,

)

\\

/

U Florida Power Corporation

- 2.-

July 24, 1972 During the inspection, it was found that certain of your activities appeared to be in noncompliance with the Code of Federal Regulations and the requirements of your permit. The items and references to the pertinent requirements are listed in the enclosure to this letter. The first item is the second occurrence where deficiencies have been iden-tifie in the material storage and inspection program. The first occurrance was identified in our letter of November 2k,1971.

Please provide us within 30 days, in writing, with your comments concerning these items, any s.eps which have been or vill be taken to correct them, any steps that have been or vill be taken to prevent recurrence, and the hte all corrective actions or preventive measures were or vill be completed. In particular, it is requested that corrective action to strengthen the material receipt, storage and inspection program be discussed.

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, you may communi-cate directly with this office.

Tery truly yours, S\\

I Jo G. Day s l

Director

Enclosure:

Description of Items of Noncompliance

~

0 I ew.

w

-*