ML19317E481
| ML19317E481 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oconee  |
| Issue date: | 08/14/1974 |
| From: | Moseley N NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Thies A DUKE POWER CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19317E472 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7912180726 | |
| Download: ML19317E481 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000269/1974005
Text
_ .. -
.._7. 7
..
7-
_ _ _ _ - - .
.
- '
iV)
~ ^ ~ ~ ~ '
~
'
,
. l' "4'
D[x.~
UNITED STATES
..
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
YM.j. I
DIRECTOV.TE OF F3}UL.lTCpY CPZRATIONS
,
~
a7
.
g gy[.
aEo.ou o - suo e ets
.-
2n oracsr9EE 5?AEE'
N C R T M ** F s r
,1m.~r.. ce m.
xm
,g,,,
. , , c , 3 , , ;. 3
In Reply Refer To:
R0:II:TNE
gyg 141974
50-269/74-5
Duke Power Company
ATTN:
Mr. A. C. Thies
Senior Vice President
Production and Transcir,sion
Power Building
422 South Church Street
Charlotte, North Carolina
28242
Gentleren:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs
G. R. Jenkins of this office on July 10-12
. T. N. Epps and
Oconee 1 facility, and to the discussion of our find
,
r the
Messrs. Epps and Jenkins with Mr. J. E. Snith at
s held by
the inspection.
the conclusion of
enclosed inspection report. Areas examined during the inspection a
are discussed in the
of selective examination of procedures and representative rWithi
interviews with personnel, and observations by the i s
ecords,
n pector.
The results of our followup of previously identified c t
contained in the enclosed report as follows:
a ters are
The status of our review of the iters which you previo
a.
by letter to us is discussed in Section V of the summarf-
usly reported
enclosed report.
of the
b.
The results of our inspection of your corrective actio
the enclosed report. identified violatiens are discussed in Section II of
n on previously
uccary of
ihe status of unresolved itens identified in previous i
c.
reports is discussed in Section IV of the summary of the enclosed
nspection
report.
7912180
-
..
e
_-
_-
_
_ _ _ . _ , _ _ _ _ . _ .
_ _ _ .
_ . _ _ _ . _ _
-
.
.
.
.
-
.
,,
'
. Duke Power Co=pany
-2-
New unresolved items are identified in Section III of the summary cf the
enclosed report.
9
During the inspection, it was found that certain activities under'your
license appear to be in violation of AEC requirements.
The violations
and reference to pertinent requirements are listed in Section I of the
summary of the enclosed report.
The violations in Section I were found,
corrected and reported by Duke Power Co:pany and no further response is
requested.
We are concerned about the timeliness of your corrective actions.
Re-
garding the item discussed in paragraph II. A.l. of the su= mary of the
report, all of the corrective action described in your letter dated
May 24, 1974, had not been implemented at the ti=e of the inspection.
In this case a door had been erected to the specific high radiation area
identified in the citation but doors had not been installed in other
high radiation areas. As you are aware, we are as interested in prompt
action to correct and prevent similar violations as we are in action to
correct the specific violation cited.
It is also noted that the items
discussed in paragraphs II.A.S. and II.A.6. were incompletely answered
in your letter dated Eby 24, 1974, and that we have verbally requested
supplemental information which we still have not received.
Accordingly,
please provide, in writing within 20 days , actions which have been taken
or are planned to improve the ti=eliness of corrective actions. You are
also requested to include a date when you will provide the information
needed to co=plete our review of the items discussed in paragraphs II. A.S.
and'II.A.6.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the AEC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a ecpy of this letter and the
enclosed inspection report will be placed in the AEC's Public Document
Room.
If this report contains any infor:ation that you believe to be
proprietary, it is necessary that you submit a written application to
this office requesting that such information be withheld frem public
disclosure.
If no proprietary 'information is identified, a written
statement to that effect should be submitted.
If an application is
subtitted , it must fully identify the bases for which information is
claimed to be proprietary. The applicatien should be prepared so that
information sought to be withheld is incorporated in a separate paper
and referenced in the application since the application will be placed
in the Public Docu=ent Room. Your application, or written statement,
should be submitted to us within 20 days.
If we are not contacted as
-specified, the enclosed report and this letter may then be placed in the
Public Docurent Room.-
- -
.
J
.
.
.
-
.
-
.
, . ,
,
Duke Pcwer Company
-3-
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, we will be glad
to discuss them with you.
Very truly yours,
!-> yl'Y.._. .
,
/)- l
%
/ j' 'j'p. , ,:z e s.
' '
l-
'
.-
Norman C. Moseley
Director
Enclosure :
RO Inspection Rpt. No.
50-269/74-5
.
e
.
.
,
,
r,
.
Letter to Duke Power Company fn N. C. Moseley
'.
dtd*
4
AUG 1 1974
DISTRIBUTION:
H. D. Thornburg, R0
RO:HQ (4)
Directorate of Licensing (4)
', DR Central Files
- Local PDR
'
- NSIC
- DTI E , OR
- State
,
- To be dispatched at a later date.
,
a
.
.1
m?w+
.m
--esm
-
AeA
mm,m
a
4&
m
o.,swwmda
.
.
.
-
-
c.
.
.
AUG 141974
Duke Power Ccmpany
Oconee 1
-;
RO Inspection Report No.
50/269/74-5
.
cc w/ enc 1:
H. D. Thornburg, R0
RO:HQ (5)
DR Central Files
Regulatory Standards (3)
Directorate of Licensing (13)
cc encl. only:
- PDR
' * Local PDR
- NSIC
- DTIE , OR
,
- State
1
- To be dispateched at a later date.
,
.