ML19309A292
| ML19309A292 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 12/27/1974 |
| From: | Engelken R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Mattimoe J SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19309A278 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8003270653 | |
| Download: ML19309A292 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000312/1974012
Text
._
_
_.
_
_ _ _ _
_
_ . .
.
_
CL
.
.
-.
,
UNITED STATES
-
i
ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
,
osaEcTORATE OF RESULATORY OPERATIONS
j
WALMUT CP. EK P 1A
SU TE 202
" 88
WALMUY CREEK. CALIFORNIA. 94596
.
DEC 37 igm
v
.
,
l
Sacramento Municipal Utility District
Docket No. 50-312
i
P. O. Box 15830
Sacramento, California 95813
'
Attention: Mr. J. J. Mattimoe
Assistant General Manager & Chief Engineer
Gentlemen:
This refers to the inspection conducted by Messrs. A. D. Johnson and .
.
M. H. Malmros of this office on December 2-4, 1974 of activities authorized
,
by AEC License No. DPR-54, and to the discussion of our findings held
by Mr. Johnson with Mr. J. Mattimoe and other members of your staff at
the conclusion of the inspection.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed
inspection report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of
'
selective examinations of procedures and representative records, in-
terviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector.
'
During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities
appeared to be in violation of AEC requirements. The items and re-
ferences to the pertinent requirements are listed in the enclosure to
this letter.
This notice is sent to you pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.201
.
'
.
of the AEC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10. Code of Federal
1
Regulations. Section 2.201 requires you to submit to this office within
twenty (20) days of your receipt of this notice, a written statement or-
explanation-in reply including: (1) corrective steps which have been
taken by you, and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will
be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance
will be achieved.
4
In addition to the need for corrective action regarding these specific
deficiencies, we are concerned about the implementation of your quality
assurance program that permitted these deficiencies to occur. Consequently,
in your reply, you should describe in particular, those actions taken
or planned to improve the effectiveness of your quality assurance program.
8003270
3
!
- :
'
,
-
. -
_
. -.
- _ - _
- _ _ _
. _ - - _
-______
.
s
DEC 37 q
Sacramento Municipal Utility District -2-
,
.
..
'
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the AEC's " Rules of Practice,"
Part 2. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and
& the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the AEC's Public Document
Room.
If this report contains any information that you believe to be
!
proprietary, it is necessary that you submit a written application to
this office, within 20 days of the date of this letter, regtesting that
such information be withheld from public disclosure. The application
must include a full statement of the reasons why it is claimed that the
,
information is proprietary. The application should be prepared so that
'
,
any proprietary information identified is contained in an enclosure to
the application, since the application without the enclosure will also
be placed in the Public Document Room.
If we do not hear _from you in
this regard within the specified period, the report will be placed in
the Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, .we will be:
glad to discuss them with you.
Sincerely,
'
ph
yt,R.H.Engelken
Director
Enclosures:
1.
Description of Violations
2.
RO Inspection Report
No. 50-312/74-12
cc w/o encl. #2
-
.
1.
R. J. Rodriguez, SMUD
,
2.
L. G. Schwieger, SMUD
,
,
.
bec w/o enc 1. #2
'
R0 Chief, FS&EB
RO:HQ (4)
.
g
,gr. ate _of Licensing (4)
Direct
~
ies
DR Central File _s
t
-
.
w e=e w - - .
,
,
_-
-
.-_
_
- _ - .