ML19305D764
| ML19305D764 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 03/07/1980 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19305D755 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-341-80-02, 50-341-80-2, NUDOCS 8004150490 | |
| Download: ML19305D764 (1) | |
Text
____,_
.t:).~
Appendix A NOTICE OF VIOLATION The Detroit Edison Company Docket No. 50-341 Based un the investigation conducted on January 21-23 and February 11-12, 1980, it appears that certain of your activities were in noncompliance with NRC requirements, as noted below. This is an infraction.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion III states, in part, that " Measures shall be established to assure that applicable regulatory requirements and the design basis... are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions."
The Enrico Fermi 2 FSAR, Section A17.1.3 states, in part, that " Edison has established and implemented procedures which delineate the design process from initiation through final approval and release, and deter-mine that design activities have been and are carried out in a planned and controlled manner, and that plant design adequacy is verified and documented."
Contrary to the above, the control of small bore piping suspension design was considered to be inadequate in that:
a.
The work performed by Wismer & Becker during 1977 and 1978 was accomplished without approved procedures.
b.
Insufficient guidance was provided by the DECO Engineering Depart-ment in their standardized chart and table type design methods.
c.
Acceptance review was not conducted by the DECO Engineering Department on a systematic basis.
e d.
Personnel qualification, certification, indoctrination, and training requirements had not been established for the DI Small Bore design group.
In addition, numerous installation deficiencies were identified that are an indication of this lack of design control.
P l
8004150 90
,.r-l 1
-