ML19305D310

Qualification Test Rept on Three Model 386A Differential Pressure Transmitters & Remote Sensors, Vol 1,Revision B

ML19305D310
Person / Time
Site:	Mcguire, McGuire
Issue date:	07/06/1978
From:	Davies L, Hatmaker D WYLE LABORATORIES
To:
Shared Package
ML19305D306	List: ML19305D305 ML19305D310 ML19305D313
References
43904-1, 43904-1-V1-RB, NUDOCS 8004140354
Download: ML19305D310 (43)

Text

.-__-_ - ___ _________

l A

s>=

SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP l

I a

+4 9

~~

h.---'.'~ ~_~.. : _ . . .- . _ _ _ - - - _ - - . . _ _ _ _ > _.

MM -. N h N .

4

+ en

$6 ee .

4~

No- -

x .. - .

4 g 1 1 .L ,

~~**

.i 1

o m tj J '

n .

,1 I I

-a j

-- , , i

.- e4* M

• N * * *- -^ 9"9-*P'9-'v*r"4P M*4*r -

i II g .i .4  ! . .n. i 1 l

_a ' ' ' '

-f p-t A

s

\_

m: ,

i,j, ,

t ; y

--f - . ,; 1

-m.-

~ -

k a d I k, -ad i j' -

_ .- -R - - ,

-c - -

n

,J ,i

__t

..g

~ .,

ym ,. .

t_

~

t.-

f 1

i i' I

i_fi 6_ . . .

2 *

'i-1 t

n

[ d: f.'

I -.. 2 i h  %) "i, 'A, ch 6

~ ,1 -

w ,. El af i 1

.# [ 3 3

~

bw $ _

4 l

a.

O t

i L

I 6

l i

I !

!f -

i U

oost l l

~

S REVISIONS aEvision.

" REPORT NO. 4390h-1 f

DATE:

Julv 6, 1978 r MM scitwime stawets ANo sysitus amoup

{

~

REU.NO. DATE l PAGES AFFECTED l SY l APP 1.. ll DEsCRMION OF CH ANGES l A 7/6/78 lVOLUMEI: Po 3 FC [ b f[ / Chance deserlotion.

F V-1, V-4 EC M k h b Aelete accuraev sentence.

Vill-1 EC MD M .Ghance NOA #3 discussion.

~

X-1 ECljk k W Add discussion to Para. 3.0.

.vW J'A 0 B 7/25/78 VOL. 1 - Pg. 1 E M, N, I N Change Table 1 - Thermal Effects . . _

l i f"

=

m i

~

l .

_ j  ;

I  !

1

- 1 I  ;

_ l I

I I r  ;

L l .

I I i ,

l.

l

{

l L 7

9 QUALIFICATION TEST REPORT ON J THREE MODEL 386A L DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTERS AND REMOTE SENSORS VOLUME I 0F lI ,

F L

l

'~ FOR I DUKE POWER COMPANY

- CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA F

r L i n

l-I r-1 L.

I L

I h sS Wyle shall have no liability for damages of any kind to person or F,y property, including special or consequential damages, resulting

' from Wyle's providing the services covered by this report.

NEQ DeWClear 1- _ _ . _: Quggigigggagn Test Report

~

REPORT NO. 43904-1 g

~

0 WYLE JOB NO. 43904 E CUSTOMER

~ ~ ' ' P.O.NO. Letter S-77-5A w

PAGE 1 OF L' PAGE REPORT

. 3g April 26, 1978

! / DATE SPECIFICATION (S) Wyle Laboratories I

L -

d5 .

Qualification Plan 545/6960/ES

[- ], q qQ f

f~ -P [ip;ff9f:t jM y r.u AM b m i : :s ; ge m@$g~ < ~

d j

\

l r- i 1.0 CUSTOMER Duke Power Company I- ADDRESS 422 South Church Street, P. O. Box 2178. Charlotte NC 28201  !

L  :

2.0 TEST SPECIMEN Three Model 386A Differential Pressure Transmitters and Remote l Sensors l 6  !

3.0 MANUFACTURER ITT Barton  ;

i 4.0

SUMMARY

[~ Three (3) Model 386A Differential Pressure Transmitters--Serial Numbers 101, 102,  !

L and 103, hereinaf ter called specimens, were subjected to a Qualification Test Program  !

as specified in Reference 5.1 and in accordance with Reference 5.2. Serial Numbers j r- 101 and 102 were equipped with Remote Sensors.  :

I I The test program was performed to qualify the specimens for use in a Pressurized  !

Water Reactor (PWR) Nuclear Power Generating Stations. Testing was performed to  !

f_ meet the intent of the standards listed in References 5.3 and 5.4. l The specimens demonstrated sufficient integrity to withstand, without compromise of l

{

L structural or electrical functions, the simulated environments specified herein.

l Alabama Professional A hegial Projects STATE oF ALABAMA t "' Engineering License #7112 EST BY

{

r COUNTY oF madison I h h- '

I W. W. Holbrook . being duiy e.orn. PROJ. ENGINE 5N ' - d j deposes and save The inf ormation contained in this Veoort is the result of

• atmaker a j complete and carefutiv conducted tests and is to the best of his knowledge true 7 {

~ end coreect in at - -

~

L. M. Davees

- sus o and sworn to b ore me this -'

• av of 6 h P 19 M (AtJL ) ' i 1 A.Dt y Notary Public m and for the CuiuntySt Mad %n, stete of Alabama.

~

My comm.uion esperes M - 19 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP f HUNTSVILLE, ALABAMA  !

PAGE NO. 2 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS group REPORT NO. L100L 1

,' 4.0

SUMMARY

(CONTINUED)

,_ Four (4) anomalies occurred during the test program. These anomalies

{ are discussed in the following paragraphs.

Notice of Anomaly No. 1 - During the Post Radiation Functional Test, ali three specimens showed an output voltage deviation on the upper end of i the pressare scale. This NOA is shown in Appendix 1,Section V, of this report.

Notices of Anomaly No. 2, 3, and 4 - These anomalies occurred during the Accident Test. Notices of Anomaly No. 2 and No. 4 were written to cover

- the change in specimen output voltage. Notice of Anomaly No. 3 describes I chamber temperature deviations during the LOCA Test. These NOA's are l shown in Appendix 1, Section Vill, of this report.

I This final test report contains the following Sections. (The qualifi-

, cation program was performed in the sequenc- indicated by Section numbers.)

Volume I: Section i Pretest inspection Section 11 Pretest Calibration ,

Section ill Baseline Functional Tests

. Section IV Radiation Exposure

Section V Post Radiation Functional Tests L

Section VI Seismic Testing Section Vil Post Seismic Functional Tests f~ Section Vill Accident Test (LOCA) l_ Section IX Post Accident Functional TestsSection X Post Test inspection

~

Volume 11: Section l Pretest Data

,_ Section 11 Baseline Functional Data Section ll Radiation Exposure Data

-- Section IV Post Radiation Functional Data Section V Post Seismic Functional Data Section VI Accident (LOCA) Data

{"

t_ Section Vil Post Accident Functional Data

, Section Vill Post Test inspection Data Section IX Hiscellaneous Data Section X Wyle Laboratories Test Procedure 545/6960/ES

[

L F

L i c l

I

, L.

PAGE NO. 3 ,

SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. 43904-1 l REVISION B

~

5.0 REFERENCES

5.1 Duke Power Company Purchase Order Letter S-77-5A. ,

i 5.2 Wyle Laboratories Qualification Plan 545/6960/ES.

5.3 lEEE 323-1974, "lEEE Standard for Qualifying Class IE Equipment for l Nuclear Power Generating Stations" 5.4 IEEE 344-1975, " Seismic Qualification of Class IE Equipment for Nuclear Power Generating Stations" f_

L-I 6.0 TEST ITEM DESCRIPTION

\

The Barton Differential Pressure Transmitter consists of a fluid-filled, r bellows-type sensor and an electromechanical transmitter. A total of three items will be tested. Two units have remote sensors and have a range of -5 to 20 psig. The third unit has no remote sensor and has a range of 0" to 60" H 20. Individual characteristics are shown in i i Table 1.

I TABLE I F #1 #2 #3 L

p Nomenclature Differential Differential Differential Pressure Pressure Pressure

[ Transmitter Transmitter Transmitter I Model 386A 386A 386A L

Range -5 to 20 psig -5 to 20 psig 0" - 60" H 2O

. Thermal Effects Bi Accu racy: 80-130*F + 0 5% F.S. + 0.5% F.S. + 0.5% F.S. Bl r 130-280*F + 10% F.S. + 10% F.S. + 10% F.S. B:

B;

[ 280-320*F [25%F.S. [25%F.S. [25%F.S.

p Repeatability + 0.2% F.S. + 0.2% F.S. + 0.2% F.S. A Sensitivity + .01% F.S. + .01% F.S. + .01% F.S. A; l

I Temperature Range 40*F to 300*F 40*F to 300*F 40*F to 300*F A:

k l

Humidtty Range O to 100% 0 to 100% 0 to 100%

Input Voltage 40 VDC 40 VDC 40 VDC i

- Output Current 4 to 20 ma 4 to 20 ma 4 to 20 ma NOTE: Throughout this report, test item serial numbers 101, 102 a

- shall be desionated as test items 1. 2. and 3. resoectivelv.nd 103

. -- .sw.- - , - - --

PAGE NO. l~I

" SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. L2 OL-1 SECTION I m

PRETEST INSPECTION l

1.0 REQUIREMENTS

[ A visual inspection will be performed on each test item upon its delivery to Wyle Laboratories to insure that the test item has not r- been damaged due to shipping or handling since manufacture.

1

,_ 2.0 PROCEDURES

-- Each test article was subjected to a visual inspection upon delivery to Wyle Laboratories. The transmitter case covers were removed and the electronic and mechanical portions of the test articles were inspected visually for any damage that might have occurred due to shipping or handling.

'~

3.0 RESULTS No apparent damage was in evidence when the test articles were inspected.

f'

'- At this point the manufacturer's representative removed the printed circuit cards from test items 2 and 3 and sent them to have quality

~

screened resistors installed to replace original resistors.

The equipment used in this inspection is listed on the Instrumentation m Equipment Sheet located in Appendix I of this Section.

.: t w

<M M

-~

[~

u l

r uw l

4 L. ,

l 7,

l i

l

P

.o PAGE NO.

sclENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. k390L-I T

r

.I APPENDIX l r-INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET l

m W

IM4 e

we L 4

[

ll llll,

!I

\1b 'f

?r2 -

$E; 3

)

e e A u 1 A 'I- 7-D 1 7 1 1 '

9 1 2 n 3- 1 -

!so it o C 1

3 l

a r A J 1

? b r r i e r la i d h C 7

e C ,

2 2

- /

n 1 1 7 O 1 '/ 2 -

1-v, '- - '3 '2f n r C - 8

' a o -

3-9 e f L T L. 1 .

I 1 E /( f r

o y

n E a t

_ c a

r u I fs 1

H e r

T s

e c c .

". t f, d.

s A A I S t s

e e

p y

t.  !  ? t y

T T B n T e g

n

'oo "o oy r

s v v

o d

e N a R f d i

/ , o n

za i v

e _

e] E 0 o

J o t a R

c e

T M r o P

I o N e t ly *w 9

9 L

+

9 1

9 t d

k e

WoG & i c 7 U n A

1 t

s 1

A -

1 G

9 u v

h C

e I' 9-

[

Q C 1 E w o la . A s r 1 s .

' & P ir o SeN i e g /

t o

( N d E l

f f

l i

5 i 9

1 1 e A

r n

a

]

O I

T 3

N U

1 J S 1 c

[

T 4 O ~

l de . 4 C t n 1 A r o o M N 2

1 1

s E

f i

A F s u

T o e

m A 3

0 t

t A(

t 1

s r u

n N N o -

t b s u

E J o

C ~

M r e s o n

a n e r

u r n f, U .

t c

a t,.

f a.

T o

r u

R f u

a n 1 i

o

+

7 T M ,

n m

o s

e o

c S

[

N I

M a

m f P

m l l

W n

a P

le K

r o.

( .

-[ 4 s fi r

e e

d /

r e nr l.,

a ing

1. t r

ns s, n

n o u E e e s S p,

t b $^

A m u t w f e ?r l

u t

s e

t t r

s e n M n T m r n e t 8 l$ I a a u

l s  % e n

}

- n n r a n eovd . m n

[

2 n a

M M G aeafl D I t e

s i

ic I n

J n .

e h o + 5 t c N I 2 3 a e _

g, D T r

PAGE NO. II-I SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS group REPORT NO. L?onL-1 L

SECTION II

[ PRETEST CAllBRATION l

1.0 REQUIREMENTS 7

The test items shall be calibrated to produce voltage outputs from 2.00 volts to 10.00 volts full scale at the required minimum and maximum pressures.

2.0 PROCEDURES r

2.1 Test items I s 2 (-5 osig to 20 osig Transmitters)

~

Electrically and pneumatically connect the Transmitter to be tested as f" shown in Figure 1 and adjust the DC power supply to 40 VDC. Allow the equipment to stabilize for 30 minutes.

NOTE: The Transmitter and Sensor must be mounted at the same height f' + 1/2".

F Record the initial output from the Transmitter at 0 psig.

Connect the pressure source as shown in Figure 1 to the LP side of the Transmitter and apply 5 psig. Record the output from the Transmitter p as shown on the digital voltmeter. Adjust, as needed, the zero y

potentiometer to obtain a 2.000-volt output. Reduce the pressure to

- O psig. Disconnect the pressure source.

NOTE: +5 psig applied to the LP side of the Transmitter simulates -5 ,

psig at the Remote Sensor. l l

,__ Connect the pressure source, as shown in Figure 1, to the Remote Sensor.

Record the Transmitter output as shown on the digital voltmeter. Apply j 20 psIg to the Sensor. Adjust, as needed, the Span potentiometer to  !

{ obtain an output reading of 10.000 volts as shown on the digital voltmeter.

t l

~

~

- The Span potentiometer was adjusted and the calibration repeated.

2.2 Test item 3 (0" to 60" H 2O Transmitter) l f Electrically and pneumatically connect the Transmitter to be tested as L shown in Figure 1 and adjust the DC power supply to 40 VDC. Allow the equipment to stabilize for 30 minutes.

g Connect the pressure source to the HP side of the Transmitter. Apply 0" H O pressure and record the initial output from the Transmitter, as shown 2

- on the digital voltmeter. Adjust the zero potentiometer, as needed, to obtain an output of 2.000 volts as shown on the digital voltmeter.

e w

PAGE NO. II"2 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. 4390k-1 2.0 PROCEDURES (CONTINUED)

. 2.2 Test item 3 (0" to 60" H O 2 Transmitter (Continued)

Apply a pressure of 60" H2O and record the output from the Transmit:er as shown on the digital voltmeter. Adjust, as needed, the Span I potentiometer to obtain an output of 10.000 volts as shown on the digital voltmeter.

+- The Span potentiometer was adjusted and the calibration repeated.

, 3.0 RESULTS All three test items were calibrated according to the procedures listed in Paragraph 2.0 by the manufacturer's representative. Full-scale output voltages were adjusted rrom 2.00 volts to 10.00 volts at the m required minimum and maximum pressures and with 40 volts DC applied to the test specimens. The test items were " powered up" for a minimum of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> prior to calibration.

~

All test items' calibrated accuracies complied with the test require-

_ ments stated in Paragraph 1.0 above. The calibration test data is shown on data sheets located in Volume 11,Section I, of this report, u

The equipment used during performance of this test is listed on the

~

Instrumentation Equipment Sheet (Appendix II) and Figure 1 (Appendix I)

.; of this Section. Data sheets indicating calibration parameters are located in Volume 11,Section I. The calibration and functional test m setup is shown in Figure 1, Appendix 1.

W*

a b.,

r L.

W

b. go

.--...n-_

I PAGE NO. II-3

~~

SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. h3904-1 c.

t p..

l I

i i

P' I

i t

1 1

b APPENDIX l  ;

FIGURE hus.

i@

w b-F L

N

L.

r f ,

I l l

\ - ' L: ~ -~ -_

I rn e,rm r r n r, ra r, r r, o , 1 1 ~ , .

PRESSURE SOURCE I I O TO 20 PstG O TO 6 0" H 2O REGULATOR X- TYPE 386A X-M ITTER o To ao esio DIGITA L

, o io so"H2o DC VOLTMETER dv V2 gp O m tp MILLIAMMETER

~

' "'^'* ~

X v3 i

,f

~

RED +

n IYs'e* \ DC POWER $0s sYoh ^

'i SUPPLY

,i m U  :'

SENSOR .

d P -

- F I G.- 1 il CAllDRATIO!! APID FUNCTIONAL SETUP $

l r

o e t PAGE NO. II-3 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. L'onL 1 W'

1 n-i i

k.

F L' APPENDIX ll L INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET r

i L

home w

M w

1 u

f i

w I

i r.

l=mo F

L -

l

t

=

L PAGE NO. IIl-1 0390k-l

~

~

SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO.

SECTION 111

,~ BASELINE FUNCTIONAL TEST

- 1.0 REQUIREMENTS The test items shall demonstrate the ability to activate or deactivate interface equipment or not to cause spurious activation or deactivation throughout the qualification testing. The test i tems shall be opera-tional at mid-range pressures and data recorded as applicable during radiation testing, seismic testing, and accident testing. Pressure boundaries shall remain intact throughout qualification testing. Failure

[- of ary Transmitter to demonstrate its design capabilities during quali-("

fica !on testing shall constitute failure of that unit.

2.0 PR0;EDURES I~ 2.1 Functional Test - Test items 1 & 2 (-5 to 20 osig)

[.

2.1.1 Connect the test specimen electrically and pneumatically as shown in Figure 1 (Appendix 1, Section 11). Ascertain pressure gage PG1 will indicate O to 20 psig.

-. 2.1.2 Apply 40 bDC to the Transmitter and allow 30 minutes for stabilization.

2.1.3 Record the initial output from the Transmitter at 0 psig as shown on the digital voltmeter. Record current in milliamps as shown on the milliammeter, w 2.1.4 Open valve VI and valve V2, close valve V3 (see Figure 1).

2.1.5 Apply 5 psig to the LP side of the Transmitter as shown on pressure gage PGl (Figure 1). This step simulates -5 psig at the Sensor. Record the output from the Transmitter and the current from the milliammeter. Reduce

- the pressure to O psig.

b- 2.1.6 Record the initial output from the Transmitter at 0 psig as shown on the digital voltmeter. Record current in milliamps as shown on the milliammeter.

2.1.7 Close valve V2 and open valve V3 2.1.8 Apply 5 psig to the Sensor. Record the output f rom the Transmitter and the current from the milliammeter. -

F 2.1.9 Repeat Paragraph 2.1.8, increasing the pressure 5 psig per step until

{ 20 psig is applied to the Sensor. Record the data each step.

I 2.1.10 Reduce the pressure to 15 psig. Record output from the Transmitter be and current from the milliammeter.

M

=.-.~w . . - . . . .am_s--w +---e.. ....w . . . - , .

PAGE NO. III-2 sc!ENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS group REPORT Na L100L 1 2.0 PROCEDURES (CONTINUED)

~

2.1 Functional Test - Test items 1 & 2 (-5 to 20 osig) (Continued) i 2.1.11 Repeat Paragraph 2.1.10, decreasing the pressure 5 psig per step until

- O psig is applied to the Transmitter. Record the data each step.

2.1.12 Repeat Paragraphs 2.1.3 through 2.1.11 a total of three times.

i 2.2 Functional Test - Test item 3(0"to60"H01 2

[~ 2.2.1 Connect the test specimen electrically and pneumatically as shown in

( Figure 1 (Appendix I, Section ll). Ascertain pressure gage PGl (Figure 1) will indicate 0" to 60" H 0.2 Disregard valve V3 as this Transmitter p- has no remote Sensor.

(

2.2.2 Apply 40 VDC to the Transmitter and allow 30 minutes for stabilization.

2.2.3 Record the initial output from the Transmitter at 0" H O as shown on the 2

digital voltmeter. Record the current in milliamps as shown on the milliammeter.  !

_ 2.2.4 Open valves VI and V2 (Figure 1).

2.2.5 Apply 15" H2O to the HP side of the Transmitter as shown on pressure sage l PGl (Figure 1). Record the output from the Transmitter and the current '

from the milliammeter. ,

- . l 2.2.6 Repeat Paragraph 2.2.5, increasing the pressure 15" H O each step until i 60" H O is applied to the HP side of the Transmitter.2 Record the l 2

data each step.

m 2.2.7 Decrease the pressure to 45" H7 0 and record the output from the Transmitter.

Record the current from the miTilammeter.

L 2.2.8 Repeat Paragraph 2.2.7, decreasing the pressure 15" H O each step until 0" H,0 is applied to the HP side of the Transmitter. 2 Record the data each

, step 7 L- 2.2.9 Repeat Paragraphs 2.2.3 through 2.2.8 a total of three times.

L.

3.0 RESULTS

~

The three test items were subjected to Baseline Functional Tests as described in the above paragraphs. All test items complied with the r- test requirements of Paragraph 1.0. The results of these tests are

[_ ,

, shown on data sheets located in Volume !!, Section it.

these tests is shown on Instrumentation Equip-

" The mentequipment used Sheets and during(Accendices Fiaure 1 11 and I respectively, Section !!).

m.., e,. . .a. =,- m --- - * - . . - , -

.% . - * - , , - . . . ~ - -

l r -

PAGE NO. IIl-3 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. 43904-1 i

3.0 RESULTS (CONTINUED) 7 It was demonstrated that the specimens possessed sufficient integrity to withstand, without compromise of electrical functions, the pre- ,

scribed ambient environment.

t r-(  !

r i

L ,

F i

I.

I i L.

F L.

l l

e L

f L

P hus.

P w

p-.

h w

I i I ' [. 5 O F~ ' tR t 1 F1 R F1 R "" 1 l

~

'7 '1 i

INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET Date Ob CY - 7 8 Job No. Nf8F Test Area C /C 8 ^# 0 #^

Technician M Ore u s Te r- Customer }"O ONf* Type Test d# Td7 8#/- [ b7M/-

Model Setial Wyle or Calibration No. Instrument Manufacturer No. No. Gov't No. Range Accuracy On De

/ Rue.e Swah keyeo 3ts-x ctoosc 1stoo goo vac. r.s y. jo. u -n Uzt-7 g

/I J A b s,'rel l'olrm<ru Yea ir Ps.eksrE 3%$4 elsa2 9 G A12. [ . ox. 7o 7-i x - 7 7 3 -l2 - ? 8 3 fressure G a-s e (Un/k < e t[e eAFAu fm45/8I DD115o7 1879Y #5.?  ?./ % /-7-78 7- f'- 7f

~

~~ ~~ ~

'V fres san e C. e IIla l % e n G yr,sa, RJ- t s;t.2 Uv -tMA1 , / r $?r k ,-

i l

l

-=

l l 5'2' o'S sT 8"

l 7

I 6/ 'r ' e'- d instrument Test Engineer / - Checked & Received By ,

7 f

W11-102 9 /

PAGE NO.

IV-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. 43904-1

. SECTION IV RADIATION EXPOSURE

, 1.0 REQUIREMENTS The test item assemblies will be uniformly exposed to a source of Cobalt 60 for a period that will yield an equivalent air dose of gamma radiation simulating the combined backggound and accident radia-tion doses. The combine rads and the maximum doseratewillbe5x10gdosewillbe2x10 rads per hour.

2.0 PROCEDURES The test items will be installed in the hot cell (gamma) as shown in Figure 2 (Appendix l) . Mid-scale pressure will be applied to the test items and data recorded and logged each hour as applicable.

The test items were transported to the Georgia institute of Technology, Frank H. Neely Nuclear Research Center, Atlanta, Georgia, and exposed to a Cobalt 60 (gamma) source that yielded a combingd 40 year background and postulated accident radiation dose of 2 x 10 rads. The dose rate

^^

was 7.67 x 105 rads per hour.

3.0 RESULTS Q The test items were exposed to gamma radiation at Georgia Institute of

b. Technology, as described in Paragraph 2.0. Data was recorded periodically and is contained in Volume ti, Section 111, of this report.

It was demonstrated that the specimens possessed sufficient integrity to withstand, without compromise of electrical functions, the prescribed

- simulated 40-year combined radiation exposure.

A radiation certification letter is included in Appendix 11 of this Section.

F L

I t e4 h

V

IV-2 '

PAGE NO.

~

REPORT NO.

04-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP F

y-e--

Y l

4 I

l I

4 APPENDIX i FIGURE l

PufB p=9 e--

I

.f L

, L l

w m

p. e m

--m+-w . , ~ , - , , ...w

R R j O

~

I i I i .i I i i i O l '"~1 T'~1 9 7 ~1 '-~~l ~ ~? 'l I ' -

Note 1: 2 Transmitters have Remote Sensors.

1 Transmitter has no Sensor.

Note 2: Pressure gauge to be capable of Indicating 0" to 60" H 2O or 0 to 20 psig. _

/

. .- =

~

Pressure Gauge HOT CELL

! Hand Regulator y,yy, l Pneumatic Source b  % _

Power Supply Hf- Trans -

qp i

mitter I v Sensor Hi l l iamneter ,. . _ _ _

Digital Vol tne ter 1,s 2 Recorder "2 T Y Po INSTALLATIO N 'EO

?

1 FIG. 2 (Raoiarion itS1 sonP)

PAGE NO. IV~b E L'S*L ' l SCIENT15fC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO.

i i

i i

I i

i r

l APPENDIX 11 r-RADIATION CERTIFICATION LETTER l I

1 1

M une haS t*

h u

7 ..

L L .

l

~- Pcga IV-s R: port 43904-1 GEORGI A INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY '

ATLANTA. GEORGI A 30332 7_

F RANK H. NEELY aucusam asseamew crNvan March 3, 1978 1

Mr. Earl Campbell Wyle Laboratories

, ,800 Governors Drive N W t Huntsv111e, Alabama 35807

' ~-

Dear Mr. Campbell:

As per your instructions and PO #4-9660-S three pressure trans-mitters and two sensor units were irradiated with cobalt-60 under power and pressure to a total dose of 2 X 108 rads.

f

,_ Current, pressure and voltage variations were monitored during irradiation (monitoring log returned with test items), i

~

This irradiation was done in two stages. Irradiation and equio- ,

ment operational parameters were maintained for both stages (photo's '

, enclosed).

We certify the specific parameters of the irradiation t'o be-Irradiation Period: 2-15-78 (1100) 22-78 (0900)

, 2-26-78 (1515) 2-78 (1415) l- Dose Rate: 7.67 X 105 rad /hr (both periods) '

8 Integrated dose: 2.0 X 10 rads

]

Dosimetry: Thermoluminescent dosimeters of lithium borate (Harshaw TL-800S) '

~

calibrated with a Farmer dosimeter Model 2502/3.

Should you require additional information on this irradiation please advise me.

CEORGIA' INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

u. ,

hfya dN"*'

Margaret Bruce, u_ Assistant Roscarch Scicntist

'~

MBB/dm1 Enclosures e

W W

.- , . . - - .w s-

~wm. .m- -%-

PAGE NO. V-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. h? COL-I REVISION A SECTION V POST RADIATION FUNCTIONAL TESTS I 1.0 REQUIREMENTS The test items shall demonstrate the ability to activate or deactivate interface equipment or not to cause spurious activation or deactivation I throughout the qualification testing. The test items shall be opera-tional at mid-range pressures and data recorded as applicable during I radiation testing, seismic testing, and accident testing. Pressure

[ boundaries shall remain intact throughout qualification testing. Failure of any Transmitter to demonstrate its design capabilities during quali-e fication testing shall constitute failure of that unit.

2.0 PROCEDURES F

[ The test items will be subjected to Post Radiation Functional Tests in accordance with Paragraph 2.0, Section i!I (Base 1ine Functional Tests).

3.0 RESULTS

[-

The three test items were subjected to functional tests as described in Section 111, Paragraph 2.0. Two sets of data were recorded for the

_. Post Radiation Functional Tests.

The three test items performed their designed functions with one anomaly noted. All three Transmitters showed evidence of abnormal output readings on the high end of the pressure transients. The outputs and percentages u of drift are shown on Table I below.

TABLE I

{

L Test item Output Voltage  % Deviation IL 1 (S/N 101) 9.47 - 5.3%

2 (S/N 102) 7.75 -22.5%

{ 3 (S/N 103) 8.78 -12.2%

L

~-

r A '

L A Notice of Anomaly was written describing the above deviations, and is contained in Appendix !., this Section.

The results of these tests are shown on data sheets located in Volume 11, ,

Section IV, of this report. The equipment used during these tests is listed j on Instrumentation Equipment Sheets (Appendix II, Section 11) and Figure 1 l

_ (Appendix 1, Section ll).

L

P PAGE NO.

V-2 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NC. k3900*I

/

3.0 RESULTS (CONTINUED)

T' Lead-in wires showed evidence of cracks. Shrinkable tubing was installed for == 41/2 inches on each Transmitter's lead-in wires per Customer's request.

4 I

i f

p--

O I

1 l

l W*

h. I W .

1 i

'w I

l f~

L.

l I_

I[

L-l

l 1

PAGE NO. V-3 g

SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. E3900-I l

l

, I

\

T e

e APPENDIX l NOTICE OF ANOMALY c

be

\,s F*

'we m

w L

i l

l v

I' w

l t .

i l L

W

-a..._._- _ _ , , , , _ _ _ _ _

" * ** * * * ' ~ - -

m-

NOTICE OF ANOM Al.Y REVISION A I P. O. NUMBER: S-77-5A WYLE JOB NO. h3904 PAGE NO. V-4 NOTICE NO.

REPORT NO. D9 ~I l CONTRACT NUMBER:

CATEGORY: 29 SPECIMEN O PROCEDURE O TEST EQUIPMENT DATE: 3/3/78 f Duke Power ATTN: Rod Walker TO.

~

PART NAME: Differential Pressure Transmitters PART NO. 386-A TEST: Post Radiation Functlonal 1. D. NO. S/N's 101, 102 and 103

- SPECIFICATION: 545-6960-ES PARA.NO. 6.2 NOTIFICATION MADE TO: Rod Walker DATE: 3/3/78 Earl Camobell VIA: Verbal r

- NOTIFICATION MADE BY:

REQUIPEMENTS: The test items shall demonstrate the ability to activate or de-activate interface equipment or not to cause spurious activation or de-activation throughout the  ;

qualification testing. The test items shall be operational at mid-range pressures and i data recorded as applicable during radiation testing, seismic testing, and accident testing. Pressure boundaries shall remain intact throughout qualification testing. Fail-  ;

r ure of any Transmitter to demonstrate its design capabilities, as shown on Table 1, Page 4, during qualification testing shall constitute failure of that unit. Factory specifica-t tions state that these transmitters are accurate to + .5% full scale.

1 f~ DESCRIPTION OF ANOMALY:

During post radiation functional testing, all three Transmitters showed abnormal output readings on the upper end of the pressure scales. The output voltages and % deviations f A

from the baseline functional tests are shown below. i

% Deviation

- (With 10.00 Volt S/N outou: Voltace Output Calibration) 101 9.47 - 5.3

[ 102 7.75 -22.5 L, 103 8.78 -12.2

- All output voltages are the average of three functional pressure transients on each test A item. Test item S/N 101 does not have coated strain gauges. Test items S/N 102 and 103 have coated strain gauges.

,P**

>=,-

DISPOSITION - COMMENTS - RECOMMENDATIONS:

_ Continue test program per customer request. A L

TEST WITNESS ENGINE e

( I Cooses: Customer -$ h-2 Coo.es: o. c. QUALITY CONTROL . -

fe ,,,, REPRESENTING PROJECT MANAGE 3 tb4W

_. 1 Copy: Ooersteons Director WYLE LASoRAToRIES - SCIENTIFIC SERVICES ANo sYSTEME GROUP - HUNTsVILLE. ALABAMA 205-837 4411

, o.~

L

PAGE NO. VI-i SCIENTIFIC SERvlCES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. L1006-1 l t

SECTION VI  ;

, SEISMIC TESTING i.0 The seismic testing portion of the test items IS contained under separate cover in Report 43904-2.

L P

e I

1 7

s FO mal t

's L

M

-e

p. .

L r

L l

=

i'%

W

Y$I PAGE NO.

sciErmFic SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. 5330k"I SECil0N Vil POST SEISMIC FUNCTIONAL TESTS , 1.0 REQUIREMENTS The test items will be subjected to functional tests as described in Section 111, Paragraph 1.0.

2.0 PROCEDURES r

{

The test itesm were subjected to Post Seismic Functional Tests in accordance with Section 111, Paragraph 2.0, of this report.

I 3.0 RESULTS The three test items were subjected to functional tests as described i- In Paragraph 2.0. The test items' response to these tests is shown on data sheets included in Volume 11,Section V, of this report.

r

[~

lt was demonstrated that the specimens possessed sufficient integrity to withstand, without compromise of electrical functions, the prescribed

- simulated seismic environment.

Equipment used during these tests is listed on instrumentation Equip-ment Sheets (Appendix 11, Section ll) and Figure 1 (Appendix 1, Section ll).

F L

r k,

I  :

L l i

L

- I L

PAGE NO. VlIi-1 SCIENTIFle services AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. L3904-1 REVISION A SECTION Vill ACCIDENT TEST (LOCA) i 1.0 REQUIREMENTS The test items shall be subjected to the temperature / pressure profile shown in Appendix II, Figures 3 and 4, of this Section. The test items will be " powered up" and operated at mid-range pressures continuously.

2.0 PROCEDURES The Transmitters were subjected to an environment of 160*F (72*F) steam at a peak pressure of 20 psig. Simultaneously, the Sensors were sub-

. jected to an environment of 340'F (172*C) steam at a peak pressure of l 20 psig.

[ The Design Basis Accident Proflies are shown in Figures 3 and 4

[ (Appendix II). The test items will be operational at mid-range pressures while the DBA Test is performed. Data shall be logged r on data sheets as applicable.

L

- 3.0 RESULTS

- The three test articles were subjected to Design Basis Accident (DBA) profiles as shown in Figures 3 and 4, Appendix 11. The total test time involved was 30 days, using superheated steam as a test media.

~

The Transmitters performed their designed functions with three anomalies noted. Notice of Anomaly #1 concerns abnormally high voltage output L~ from test item 2. The voltage output exceeded 23 volts DC and then returned to normal.

Notice of Anomaly #2 concerns temperature drops in the sensor chamber, bv as much as 50*F for very short periods of time. The total time involved P

is = 38 minutes.

Notice of Anomaly #3 concerns abnorma'ly high voltage outputs from test item 3 The voltage output exceeded 22 volts DC and then returned to

- normal af ter approximately 4 minutes. The erratic behavior of test items 2 and 3 is attributed to cracked external lead-in wires, with water or A

~

steam causing shorting between the wires. The lead-in wires do not A

_ reflect a true installed configuration and were not considered part of the test item by Duke Power Company.

Notices of Anomaly were written for these ano?.alles and are shown in Appendix I of this Section,

- 1 r

I

TAGE NO. VIIl-2 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. 43904-1 3.0 RESULTS (CONTINUED)

The Transmitters and Sensors were tested simultaneously in separate chambers, with the actual temperature transients shown in Figures 5 and 6, Appendix II.

-- A GN, pressure source at approximately 12.5 psig was connected to the Sens8rs of S/N 101 and S/N 102 Transmitters. A GN2 pressure source of approximately 30 inches of water was connected to S/N 103 Transmitter.

e The equipment used during this test is shown in Figure 7 and on the 1 Instrumentation Equipment Sheets (Appendices ll and 111, respectively).

Test data is included in Volume ll,Section VI, of this report.

I i

F~

i f

L L

r b

1 L

P*

w l'

-,s L

W b ase=

PAGE NO. V!fI-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. 43904-1 l

r k

e h

k APPENDIX l r  :

NOTICES OF ANOMALY f

L La F

L f~ i L

r l

L

(.

L.

ba*.

F-I i -

l.

NOTICE OF ANOMALY 5 77-M WYLE JOB NO. Lto^t PAGE NO.

VIII"b NOTICE NO. 2 P. O. NUMBER:

REPORT NO, 43904-1 CONTR ACT NUMBER:

CATEGORY: O SPECIMEN O PROCEDURE Di TEST EQUIPMENT DATE: 3/9/78 TO: Duke Power Company ATTN: Rod Walker PART NAME: Di fferential Pressure TransmieterPART NO. ~4 M - A TEST: LOCA l. D. NO. 5/N 102 SPECIFICATION: Wyle Test Procedure 545/6960/ESPARA. NO. L11 NOTIFICATION MADE TO: Rod Walker DATE: 3/9/78 Earl Campbell VIA: Verbal NOTIFICATION MADE BY:

REQUIREMENTS:

The test items shall demonstrate the ability to activate or deactivate Interface equipment or not to cause spurious activation or deactivation throughout the qualification testing. The test items shall be operational at mid-range pressures and data recorded as appilcable during radiation testing, seismic testing, and accident testing. Pressure boundaries shall remain intact throughout qualification testing.

Failure of any Transmitter to demonstrate its design capabilities, as shown on Table 1 Page 4, during qualification testing shall constitute failure of that unit.

DESCRIPTION OF ANOMALY:

L During test setup for LOCA testing, abnormally high voltage output was noted on F Transmitter S/N 102. The output voltage exceeded 23 VDC. Specification states "The

[ maximum output voltage shall be 10 VDC."

F DISPOSITION - COMMENTS - RECOMMENDATIONS:

Continue testing per customer request. Perform thorough post test inspection and record any anomalies observed.

~

otsTRIOUTioN:

TEST WITNESS ENGINEE

[

orenen oeot. t/ ,

a i I Coo es: customer 2 copies: Q. C. QUAllTY CONTROL C - -

REPRESENTING PROJECT MANAGER E c c sets

- 1 Copy: operations Derector J WYLE LAeonAToRIEs - SCIENTIFIC SERVICES ANo SYSTEMS GROUP - HUNTSVILLE. ALAeAMA 206437 4411 80su hb u.

NOTICE OF ANOM ALY 3 5-77-5A WYLE JOB NO. 43000 PAGE NO. VfII-C NOTICE NO P. C. N UMB E R :

REPORT NO. 41406-1 CONTR ACT NUMBER:

CATEGORY: O SPECIMEN O PROCEDURE 151 TEST EQUIPMENT DATE:

TO: Duke Power Company ATTN: Rod Walker PART NAME: Differential Pressure Transmitter PART NO. 186-A TEST: LocA 1. D. NO.

SPECIFICATION: Wyle Test Procedure 545/6960/ES PARA.NO. o.1.1 and rieure 4 C. Boyd and R. Walker DATE: 1/11/78 NOTIFICATION MADE TO:

E. Campbell, D. Hatmaker VIA: Telephone NOTIFICATION MADE BY:

REQUIREMENTS:

+ Design Basis Accident (DBA) Test The test items shall be subjected to a Design Basis Accident (DBA) simulation with the Transmitters and Sensors installed in separate chambers. The Design Basis Accident profiles are shown in Figures 4 and 5. Required temperature for the Sensors is 240*F

, for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

DESCRIPTION OF ANOMALY:

4 The redundant safety controller for the steam solenoids dropped out eight (8) times during I the 24-hour test period, causing the temperature in the sensor chamber to drop by as much e as 50*F for short periods of time. The total time involved is approximately 38 minutes.

The technician involved reset the controller each time, but neglected to correct the

,_ controller set point to a higher temperature to prevent the recurrence of this condition.

t

, L.

F L

r L

7. -.

L. .

I L~

DISPOSITION - COMMENTS - RECOMMENDATIONS:

[ Continue testing per customer request. The critical period (highest temperature) of testing was already completed and the condition should not jeopardize the test or results. The

[ controller set point was raised and no further anomalies occurred.

e TEST WITNESS ENGINEE -

~ e

( l Coo es: customer ""'4 2 coo.es: C. c. QUALITY CONTROL - -'t -

REPRESENTING PROJECT MANAGER MS

'$c y acts L 1 Coov: Operatens D roctor / '

WYLE LAtoRATomits - SCIENTIFIC Services AND SYSTEMS CROUP - HUNTSVILLE. ALABAMA 206437 4411

{ ic w ic.e i _.

NOTICE OF ANOM ALY

~

43904 PAGE NO. VIIl-6

'40TICE NO O D O. NUMBER: Letter S-77-5A WYLE JOB NO_

REPORT NO. 43904-1 _ ,,_

CONTRACT NUMBER:

CATEGORY: O SPECIMEN O PROCEDURE O TEST EQUIPMENT DATE: 1/16/78 TO: Duke Power Company ATTN: Rod Walker PART NAME: Differential Pressure Transmitter PART NO. 186-A TEST: 'T^ I. D. NO. a/n in3 In" ~ Ann uy

- SPECIFICATION: Wyle Test Procedure 545/6960/ES PARA.NO. 5.1.1 Rod Walker DATE: 3/16/78 NOTIFICATION MADE TO:

Earl Campbell VIA: Verbal

. NOTIFICATION MADE BY:

REQUIREMENTS:

- The test items shall demonstrate the ability to activate or deactivate Interface equipment or not to cause spurious activation or deactivation throughout the quallfication testing. The test items shall be operational at mid-range pressures and data recorded as applicable during radiation testing, seismic testing, and accident testing. Pressure boundaries shall remain intact throughout qualification testing.

Failure of any Transmitter to demonstrate its design capabilities, as shown on Table 1, Page 4, during qualification testing shall constitute failure of that unit.

F DESCRIPTION OF ANOMALY:

L p At 10:00 A.M., 3/16/78, abnormally high voltage output from Test item S/N 103 was discovered. Voltage output was 22.78 volts at = 50 ma. The pressure Indicated L 30.1" H20. The calibrated maximum output voltage should not exceed 10 VDC. At 10:14 A.M., 3/16/78, the voltage output returned to normal, 4.78 volts at = 10 ma.

u L.

r DISPOSITION - COMMENTS - RECOMMENDATIONS:  ;

Continue testing per customer's request. Perform thorough post test inspection and record

f. any anomalies observed.

L

"~

CISTRIBUTION:

M /7 '

I ortnat: Dept. TEST WITNESS ENGINEER -

1 I coo.es: customer g ". 4 l

2 Cop es: o. c.

i"cc7ocTec."" aseaesENTiso QUALITY eao; ecru ^"^osa CONTROL"N< ## l F 1 Coov: opersion Dweetor / \ l L J

_ WYLE LABoRATomtEs - SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND sYSTEWi GROUP - HUNTSVILLE. ALASAMA 205 837 4411

posu is j i L.

I

l l

i l

PAGE NO YIII'7 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP 43904-1 REPORT NO.

I

( -

r APPENDIX 1I p

FIGURES

- i

• I i

Peg b

m w

f L .

r L  :

i W~

m FM b

T'

=

a2< .:

s33 5 r F E

'

• L

! 0 I I 7 F O

1 R P

O A C

O L

' S R

E T

T I

s I M

' S y i N a A d R 0 T 3

~  ; 7 J-7 -

Q l

~

{ -

? F

~ 2

~

~

O 7 1

)

E 1 . l

.E AS C

.M O

. T 1 .I

.T OTN

(

i L

1 _

I

, g 7 g T _

c .

e c _

s re

~ se F

- s

~

• 5 6 I rl ei 02 30 -

t f 69 i0 __

1 1 4 _

t o 2 i r 7 mP '

~ s _

- nA

[ aC , _

rO TL _ _

1 ovein

)

COe, o?  : n

-f u

1 t

O O1J.

t.

ll I

I I

l

~

f

'M M R M f~~l I i i I i i I J M , i 1 1

--'; -' ~~ -' 1 ' ' ' -

1 Sensors O

O v

O O

4 340*F 3 sec 104 psig .,' , ' 1200 sec @ 20 psig 1.L o O -

O ro LL" 240*F

] I day c 29 days W LL] dr' '

l- .

O O 187'F N f (

) J r

G b EW 3<

8 si

~

70 F  !

0 -

[J [j TlME (NOT 10 sCAtE ) FIG.4 seas 0as - toca ra0 rite ;i

M ~~' ~ ~ ' ~ ' '

I i I .. I 1. '! R  !^1 R O M I~ i i i Fl  ! ~I '

. r Transmitters LOCA Profile ,.

O . . . actual temperature es :

N required temperature o e 30 days c o

m 172*F

- . _. . . . . . . . .; 3. . . . . . . 4 L' ,

ei n

. /

,I t ... . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . .

l.L . 13&F l 0 . 2400 sec O o

] t..

1.d l-70*F

... i es p y9

-D D 2 .c_

M a-D .

S. .~

Q-...~.... . . . . f f. . - . . . -

.(

T IFelE FIGi5

1 . M n [ 'l 'f 7 I i i n ( ) M i - s 1 -

'--' ' ' ' ' ~~' ' '  ?

Sensors .

m.

... Actual Required -

ei O

O -

9

>e e

t..

• . *~ , 1200 see @ 20 psig l_L o o

• e, O

eo Q* .

S 2fe0*F c 2.9 days >

u"J -), day..br. . .+e l---

O O 18 N _ . 7_* F . . . . . _ . . . .

_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ r fu .

n 13 O O,W O "5 ,

O- z- -

w_

.)

w .. ,

e _. ..

~

70 F -

o. )tc

). He. o6~

i<

))

...T. I.M. .F . . . . .

_._.________ _ _ _ _ _______ _ ___ .,,. . . - , . , , . - _ . _ - - _ _ _ .__ _ _ . . . _ , . - - _ _.- ~ _ __

n M i,1 F I R I iI i ( 1 I i  !  ! I i '-'

~I ' ' '

Steam DC Supply Recorder Power DVH Supply Temp.

Controller Thermocouple fi

~

p Chamber Interface Press. Gauge N

p Shut-Off Valve 7hg l/ ) g Trans- Trans-

{ mitter j l mitter j l mitter l J Air Supply solenoid fl y j j j

%d %s

-;; d;;;  :: ;; '

w r\

~

d% /\ g_

I Press. Transducer l - I- 1 .

'.. r Control Valve # g; g3 P

< Q"

??

-.. oS Supei 'ater "

\ S< -

J ACC"*"I"E '

(_ y _] h _ Sensor 3--

Solenold #2 FIG,4 Te=P-Controller Thermocoupie s2 t.0CA SETUP

u.a%- s h

PAGE NO. vi l l- 13 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. b390k"I I

t i

t 4

9 P

p APPENDIX 111 INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET r

>=

w W

lA W

b.

We qm.

6 l

n=

• 1 r l

l.

W e ,

n-

Pcg2 Vlli-14 Report 43904-1 J *4 c'- k & R R R e 5. 9 d- O  ? R 3

i { & S & 4 4 k i e s s *

• r a x NA A e o- *. g i (i N 3 6 r- ts  % q g s S 5 Y N N 6 T k $ C *

• g h' r '

i t

?

c Q }

s 9 9 n m. h 4 q R O s n I

~

T m

b h #

t \

w4 a N

a e

[ w ; d F E *F M E

+

t t t + e t z < "

s a

1. 4 9

u p y s

n a a a a -

9 u. u

, 7 2 4

e  %)

@ a

( .

x h

- e e : e e n : . y =

0- 2  % 4

• R$

& a 6

• C t t 't. rn Ti Z

W

! J~ i' v

?

e

'i e,

e i a a

?

e o o e

'E a

c:

q > e. $ D' 4 1 Bf e

~

u 4 N

• o.

e R i ss 9 C Q 9

e e ",

,1 g k  ?

e O h 1 k & $ c 2 k e^ e..

C 3 e f)  : "; *"e, v U s o- c 0 c  !-

• W c. i + cc s ,a c t t 5 t

m A - i q g4 o. e c. R t R n m -a ~

Z > "'"

4 i 2fs C 2

• 4 R R ; E s

O s 3 " o h "$ *0 ~"

m $ E E -

c *

? O h > c j, a e c K 6 t R e E a e e R

) 9 i

3 2 Z h s g

e e T g n, g e -

[ g $

e m g k xq I ^

c k k -

m Z Z 2  ; e V

~ N C 4 E g 3

4 gw w o2 h -,. -. I Q -

1 eo c Q: T *

(2 3

e V

t v

= g t x 'e

-c o

e e a o e e 5q,E '! e' r

.x e e 33j b 5 ' 8 M 2 $2 e m e 1 ( 0; .' C ==- {

Ed $ $1 R R T E E3i' id 5 3 h 1 u :o C

= .,

= 4 e ,e9 't,j y e o, e d

c-tW oc %ot b R Lt

+ 4 1 s.

i c,, W I

I 2 4 t 7 o, E ,p" g< t-T 4c

b O' 2 ~% )

.. g 3 o. C d C g 'q ~' ~ . $

P . w i

,, 'd g c, . ' , - )d

., 3 5 5 C -

w h g qE c e

4 ' 7' sT AT

" o 2 4 2' R R R  % t E e C2 4 @d [n d'M M3 (D Cb c.b [ kq( RE fh e

l

_ $,Hf Q >-

i i

me

f 1 O O F r" m t 7 i j n i 1 i

t 7 7 ~~ 1 7

'~1

~

INSTRUMENTATION EQUIPMENT SHEET Date ~#-M Job No. 4396W rest Area AoM Technician 18/* MA sl4 Customer /)ukt Po ws t' 0

• Type Test A N # S " *) h r a m t_

Model Serial Wyle et No. Instrument Calibretion Manufacturet No. No. God No. Range Accuracy On Due

\ Mar,amitw Amn, r at er "

A - 1A& J1 1s fA Anct9' '

c-ton

.? . / '

1. - C- 7 s A C'?!

2 Mrs na m e frr Pf.aon m 1 afro. .1A Esi f Si~rints n ri tz. o -Lo " * '

+ .1 .1-3-11 A -3 ? 1 3 _ Oceu r ?rs tidr# Wolbsep + Trornas v FAI4 fl21 sblico s 9n r09- Jiy sio $,fL

• v I-9 '12 7-9-11 4- Dra,Lsl Ma,Ito,,,ofir el P 14tfA A ortti 9&tvr ** 42 %

tono v . l l.l'-7 s 7-1 1 'r e 5 Dr. E,un s fus,ala hroco u

i JMita-1 csitor 9 Mil n - s ta v tl % t -l -12

$ ~ A ~?R

's EE BW as Si.

w_

instrument Test Engineer /_ke J_ /N Wit-1029 Checked & Received By D A M.

PAGE NO. IX"I

~

SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS group REPORT NO. 43906-1 SECTION IX POST ACCIDENT FUNCTIONAL TESTS 1.0 REQUlfEMENTS The te:st items shall be subjected to functional tests as described in Se: tion III, Paragraph 1.0, of this report.

2.0 _ PROCEDURES r

i The test items were subjected to Post Accident Functional Tests as I

described in Section li t, Paragraph 2.0, of this report.

3.0 RESULTS The test items were subjected to functional tests as described in Paragraph 2.0. The test items complied with test requirements shown in Paragraph 1.0. The test results obtained are shown on data sheets

. located in Volume !!, Section Vil, of this report.

The equipment used during these tests is listed on Figure 1 (Appendix I, Section !!) and the Instrumentation Equipment Sheet (Appendix II, Section ll).

Test items S/N 102 and S/N 103 evidenced some erratic behavior during the

[ Accident Tests. These anomalies are discussed in' Notices of Anomaly t.

No. 2 and No. 4 and are located in Section Vill, Appendix 1, of this report.

L I

L r _

m b

E

r PAGE NO. X-1 -

SCIENTIFIC SERVICES AND SYSTEMS GROUP REPORT NO. k3 COL-1 REVISION A SECTION X POST TEST INSPECTION 1.0 REQUIREMENTS Upon completion of all testing, each test item assembly shall be dismantled to the extent that all parts can be visually inspected-The condition of insulation, mechanical parts, lubricants, electrical contacts, wiring, and other related components shall be recorded.

2.0 PROCEDURES The test item assemblies were dismantled and inspected at the comple-r tion of all tecting in accordance with Paragraph 1.0.

i r

3.0 RESULTS The test items were disassembled to the extent that the electronic portion of the Transmitters could be visually examined. This examination revealed that all three test items showed marked swelling on the

_ potting around the Zero and Span potentiometer screws. The internal lead-in wires on test items 1 and 3 showed evidence of light cracks. All three PC boards evidenced cracked coatings. The erratic behavior of

{t test items 2 and 3 is attributed to cracked external lead-in wires, A

A with water or steam causing shorting between the wires. The lead-in A wires do not reflect a true installed configuration and were not con- A sidered part of the test item by Duke power Company.

More detailed results are shown on data sheets located in Volume 11, Section Vill.

Since the test items showed no evidence of mechanical failure or

[i apparent change in dimensions, the housings on the Sensors and Transmitter bellows were not removed.

L Y"

W w

M P

w