ML19294A287

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Design Basis Assurance Inspection (Programs) Inspection Report 05000255/2019010
ML19294A287
Person / Time
Site: Palisades 
(DPR-020)
Issue date: 10/21/2019
From: Karla Stoedter
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2
To: Arnone C
Entergy Nuclear Operations
References
IR 2019010
Download: ML19294A287 (11)


See also: IR 05000255/2019010

Text

October 21, 2019

Mr. Charles Arnone

Vice President, Operations

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway

Covert, MI 49042-9530

SUBJECT:

PALISADES NUCLEAR PLANT: DESIGN BASIS ASSURANCE INSPECTION

(PROGRAMS) INSPECTION REPORT 05000255/2019010

Dear Mr. Arnone:

On September 12, 2019, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an

inspection at Palisades Nuclear Plant and discussed the results of this inspection with

Mr. Darrell Corbin and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are

documented in the enclosed report.

One finding of very low safety significance (Green) is documented in this report. This finding

involved a violation of NRC requirements. We are treating this violation as a non-cited violation

(NCV) consistent with Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.

If you contest the violation or significance or severity of the violation documented in this

inspection report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection

report, with the basis for your denial, to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN:

Document Control Desk, Washington, DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional

Administrator, Region III; the Director, Office of Enforcement; and the NRC Resident Inspector

at Palisades.

This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection

and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document

Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for

Withholding.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Karla K. Stoedter, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

Docket No. 05000255

License No. DPR-20

Enclosure:

As stated

cc w/ encl: Distribution via LISTSERV

ML19294A287

SUNSI Review

Non-Sensitive

Sensitive

Publicly Available

Non-Publicly Available

OFFICE RIII/EB2

RIII/EB2

NAME

NFeliz-Adorno

KStoedter

DATE

10/21/19

10/21/19

Enclosure

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Inspection Report

Docket Number:

05000255

License Number:

DPR-20

Report Number:

05000255/2019010

Enterprise Identifier: I-2019-010-0053

Licensee:

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

Facility:

Palisades Nuclear Plant

Location:

Covert, MI

Inspection Dates:

August 18, 2019 to September 12, 2019

Inspectors:

N. Feliz-Adorno, Senior Reactor Inspector

M. Greenleaf, Reactor Inspector

M. Jones, Reactor Inspector

Approved By:

Karla K. Stoedter, Chief

Engineering Branch 2

Division of Reactor Safety

2

SUMMARY

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continued monitoring the licensees

performance by conducting a design basis assurance inspection (programs) inspection at

Palisades Nuclear Plant in accordance with the Reactor Oversight Process. The Reactor

Oversight Process is the NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial

nuclear power reactors. Refer to https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/oversight.html for more

information.

List of Findings and Violations

Failure to Environmentally Qualify Electric Equipment Inside Containment for the Most Severe

Chemical Composition

Cornerstone

Significance

Cross-Cutting

Aspect

Report

Section

Mitigating

Systems

Green

NCV 05000255/2019010-01

Open/Closed

None (NPP)

71111.21N

The inspectors identified a Green finding and an associated Non-Cited Violation of Title 10 of

the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50.49, "Environmental Qualification of Electric

Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants," Paragraph (e)(3), for the licensee's

failure to base the qualification of electric equipment inside containment on a chemical

composition that was at least as severe as that resulting from the most limiting mode of plant

operation. Specifically, the most severe chemical composition expected inside containment

would result from the containment spray injection mode. However, the qualification of electric

equipment inside containment was based on the less severe chemical composition of the

containment spray recirculation mode, which is borated water from the injection mode

neutralized by the sodium tetraborate located inside of containment.

Additional Tracking Items

None.

3

INSPECTION SCOPES

Inspections were conducted using the appropriate portions of the inspection procedures (IPs) in

effect at the beginning of the inspection unless otherwise noted. Currently approved IPs with

their attached revision histories are located on the public website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-

rm/doc-collections/insp-manual/inspection-procedure/index.html. Samples were declared

complete when the IP requirements most appropriate to the inspection activity were met

consistent with Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 2515, Light-Water Reactor Inspection

Program - Operations Phase. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records,

observed activities, and interviewed personnel to assess licensee performance and compliance

with Commission rules and regulations, license conditions, site procedures, and standards.

REACTOR SAFETY

71111.21N - Design Bases Assurance Inspection (Programs)

The inspectors evaluated the environmental qualification program implementation through the

sampling of the following components:

Select Sample Components to Review - Risk Significant/Low Design (Inside/Outside

Containment) (IP Section 02.01) (6 Samples)

(1)

Shutdown Cooling Suction Valve MO-3015

(2)

Low Pressure Safety Injection Pump P-67A Motor

(3)

Cable 19-I29A

(4)

Narrow Range Pressure Transmitter PT-0104B

(5)

Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger Control Valve Pilot Valve SV-0821

(6)

Shutdown Cooling Heat Exchanger Inlet Valve SV-0937

Select Sample Components to Review - Primary Containment (Inside Containment)

(IP Section 02.01) (1 Sample)

(1)

Power Operated Relief Valve PRV-1042B

INSPECTION RESULTS

Failure to Environmentally Qualify Electric Equipment Inside Containment for the Most

Severe Chemical Composition

Cornerstone

Significance

Cross-Cutting

Aspect

Report

Section

Mitigating

Systems

Green

NCV 05000255/2019010-01

Open/Closed

None (NPP)

71111.21N

The inspectors identified a Green finding and an associated Non-Cited Violation of Title 10 of

the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Part 50.49, Environmental Qualification of

Electric Equipment Important to Safety for Nuclear Power Plants, Paragraph (e)(3), for the

licensee's failure to base the qualification of electric equipment inside containment on a

chemical composition that was at least as severe as that resulting from the most limiting

mode of plant operation. Specifically, the most severe chemical composition expected inside

containment would result from the containment spray injection mode. However, the

qualification of electric equipment inside containment was based on the less severe chemical

4

composition of the containment spray recirculation mode, which is borated water from the

injection mode neutralized by the sodium tetraborate located inside of containment.

Description: The containment spray system has two modes of operation. During the initial

injection mode, the containment spray system draws borated water from the safety injection

and refueling water tank and sprays it inside containment to alleviate pressure during large

break loss of coolant accidents and to scrub radioactive particles. The sprayed borated water

collects at the containment sump where it is neutralized by mixing with sodium tetraborate,

which is pre-staged in baskets inside of containment. The containment spray system

transitions to its recirculation mode of operation after depleting the tank, drawing suction from

the containment sump and spraying the recirculated solution inside containment to continue

scrubbing radionuclides.

The most severe chemical composition expected inside containment would result from the

containment spray initial injection mode. However, in 2004, the licensee discovered the

environmental qualification of electric equipment inside of containment was based on the

chemical effects of the containment spray recirculation mode. This condition was captured in

the Corrective Action Program as CR-PLP-2004-1616. As a result, the licensee evaluated

the effects of the initial spray pH. However, the inspectors noted the licensee did not

evaluate the chemical compatibility of the initial spray with each exposed material composing

the electric equipment required to be environmentally qualified. During this inspection period,

the licensee determined this concern affected 17 systems such as low pressure injection,

high pressure injection, and shutdown cooling.

Corrective Actions: The licensee was still evaluating its planned corrective actions at the time

of the inspection. However, the continued non-compliance does not present an immediate

safety concern because the licensee reasonably determined the affected equipment

remained capable of performing their safety functions. Specifically, the licensee identified all

material in environmentally qualified components inside containment and located an

evaluation from a similar nuclear power plant addressing boric acid interaction with all but one

of the materials located inside of Palisades containment. The licensee determined this

evaluation reasonably demonstrated the evaluated materials were compatible with the initial

borated water spray. Similarly, the licensee located industry information for the material that

was not addressed by the evaluation (i.e., chlorinated polyethylene) and reasonably

determined it was compatible with the initial borated water spray.

Corrective Action References: CR-PLP-2019-3692, CR-PLP-2019-

3693, CR-PLP-2019-3694, CR-PLP-2019-3695, CR-PLP-2019-3697, CR-PLP-2019-3698,

CR-PLP-2019-3699, CR-PLP-2019-3700, CR-PLP-2019-3702, CR-PLP-2019-3703,

CR-PLP-2019-3704, CR-PLP-2019-3705, CR-PLP-2019-3706, CR-PLP-2019-3707,

CR-PLP-2019-3708, CR-PLP-2019-3709, and CR-PLP-2019-3710.

Performance Assessment:

Performance Deficiency: The failure to base the qualification of electric equipment inside

containment on a chemical composition that was at least as severe as that resulting from the

most limiting mode of plant operation was contrary to 10 CFR 50.49(e)(3) and was

performance deficiency.

Screening: The inspectors determined the performance deficiency was more than minor

because it was associated with the Equipment Performance attribute of the Mitigating

Systems cornerstone and adversely affected the cornerstone objective to ensure the

availability, reliability, and capability of systems that respond to initiating events to prevent

5

undesirable consequences. Specifically, the failure to demonstrate qualification of electric

equipment inside containment for the most severe chemical effects does not ensure the

equipment would be capable of providing its accident mitigating functions.

Significance: The inspectors assessed the significance of the finding using Appendix A, The

Significance Determination Process (SDP) for Findings At-Power. The finding screened as of

very low safety significance (Green) because it did not result in the loss of operability or

functionality of mitigating systems. Specifically, the licensee reasonably determined the

affected equipment remained capable of performing their safety functions based on an

evaluation from a similar nuclear power plant and industry information addressing boric acid

interaction with the affected materials.

Cross-Cutting Aspect: Not Present Performance. No cross cutting aspect was assigned to

this finding because the inspectors determined the finding did not reflect present licensee

performance.

Enforcement:

Violation: Title 10 CFR 50.49(e)(3) requires The electric equipment qualification program

must include and be based on, in part, Chemical Effects, and that The composition of

chemicals used must be at least as severe as that resulting from the most limiting mode of

plant operation (e.g., containment spray, emergency core cooling, or recirculation from

containment sump).

Contrary to the above, as of September 16, 2019, the licensees electric equipment

qualification program failed to include and be based on the chemical effects of the most

severe composition of chemicals resulting from the most limiting mode of plant

operation. Specifically, the most severe chemical composition expected inside containment

would result from the containment spray injection mode. However, the qualification of electric

equipment inside containment was based on the chemical composition of the containment

spray recirculation mode, which was less severe due to the borated water from the injection

mode being neutralized by the sodium tetraborate located inside of containment.

Enforcement Action: This violation is being treated as an non-cited violation, consistent with

Section 2.3.2 of the Enforcement Policy.

EXIT MEETINGS AND DEBRIEFS

The inspectors verified no proprietary information was retained or documented in this report.

On September 12, 2019, the inspectors presented the design basis assurance

inspection (programs) inspection results to Mr. Darrell Corbin and other members of the

licensee staff.

6

DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

71111.21N Corrective Action

Documents

CR-PLP-2004-

01616

PRE-NRC SSDI, RB Spray pH Considerations Title: FSA

Pre-NRC SSDI, RB Spray pH Considerations

03/02/2004

CR-PLP-2015-

00583

EQ replacement dates occur before 1R24 begins

02/19/2015

CR-PLP-2017-

01007

VOP-3015 Gear Box Grease Degraded

03/18/2017

CR-PLP-2018-

00238

EMA-1206 oil was identified with higher than expected

viscosity

01/12/2018

Corrective Action

Documents

Resulting from

Inspection

CR-HQN-2019-

01982

The NRC identified that EN-MA-141, Attachment 1 does not

contain any reference to potential EQ implications during

grease evaluation

09/06/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03371

Boric acid leak on P-67A

08/27/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03409

Corrective action document written for unsat oil viscosity for

EMA-1206 did not address EQ or past-operability

08/29/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03463

Unable to locate auxiliary feedwater pump P-8C motor oil

analysis for 2013

09/04/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03464

Auxiliary feedwater pump P-8C had unsat oil viscosity

09/04/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03559

DBD-7.01 contain misleading information regarding what

containment spray density is required for EQ Qualification of

equipment inside containment

09/10/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03692

Qualification of CIS did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03693

Qualification of CLP did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03694

Qualification of CRS did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03695

Qualification of CSW did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03697

Qualification of CVC did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

7

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

CR-PLP-2019-

03698

Qualification of ESS did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03699

Qualification of FWS did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03700

Qualification of HPI did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03702

Qualification of LPI did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03703

Qualification of MFW did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03704

Qualification of NMS did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03705

Qualification of PCS did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03706

Qualification of PZR did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03707

Qualification of RIA did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03708

Qualification of SDC did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03709

Qualification of SIT did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

CR-PLP-2019-

03710

Qualification of VAS did not consider chemical effects

09/16/2019

Drawings

VEN-E48

Install Conduit/Component Seals

4

Engineering

Changes

EC-7083

Equivalent Replacement and/or Substitution of Nebula EP0

Grease with MOV Long Life Grade 0 Grease

0

Engineering

Evaluations

E48-EMA-01

EQ File - Louis-Allis Model COGX Motors

12

E48-EMA-07

EQ File - Reliance Electric 2300 Vac motor

10

E48-SV-01

EQ file: Automatic Switch Company (ASCO) Model 206-381

and

NP 8320 solenoid valves

18

E48-VOP-03

EQ File - Limitorque Valve Operators with RH Motor

Insulation Systems Located in Containment

18

8

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

E48-XMTR-01

EQ File: Rosemount Series 1153B and 1153D Transmitters

8

E48-XMTR-02

EQ File: Rosemount Series 1154 Transmitters

8

Miscellaneous

DBD-7.01

Electrical Equipment Qualification Program

10

DBD-7.02

EQ Master Equipment List

14

E48-CABLE-19

Samuel Moore EPDM Insulated and Hypalon Jacketed

Instrumentation Cable

13

E48-SV-08

ASCO Model NP 8316 and NP 8321 Solenoid Valves

18

E48-SV-24

Target Rock Power Operated Relief Valves for Pressurizer

Pressure

7

NUREG/CR-6095

Aging, Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA), and High Potential

Testing of Damaged Cables

04/01/1994

Procedures

EN-DC-303

Lubrication Program

1

EN-DC-310

Predictive Maintenance Program

8

EN-MA-141

Limitorque Valve Operator Model SMB/SB/SBD-000

Through 5 MOV and HBC Periodic Inspection

13

EOP-4.0

Loss of Coolant Accident Recovery

24

MSE-E-41

Refurbishment of Limitorque Type SMB-0 Though SMB-3

Actuators

10

SEP-EQ-PLP-001 Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment

2

SEP-LUB-PLP-

001

Lubrication Analysis and Monitoring

2

WI-SPS-E-02

Insulation Resistance Testing of Electrical Equipment

9

Self-Assessments LO-PLPLO-2019-

00013

Environmental Qualification (EQ) Program Assessment

05/28/2019

Work Orders

WO00262884

PRV-1042B; VT-2 NOP/NOT (CR-PLP-2011-00191)

01/31/2011

WO00325740

MO-3015 Burnish Torque Switch Contacts

02/09/2014

WO51591547

PRV-1042B; Replace PRV-1042B EC-20196

08/19/2011

WO51591548

PRV-1043B; Replace PRV-1043B EC-20196

11/08/2010

WO52435844

  • EEQ* REPLACE SV-0821

01/27/2014

WO52436138

EEQ Maint. - PM VOP-3015

02/09/2014

WO52537816

RI-59C - LTOP Pessure Transmitter Cals

10/19/2015

WO52544964

PT-0104B, EEQ Replace Transmitter

09/28/2015

WO52608846

P-67A MTR/PMP Oil Change

04/08/2016

9

Inspection

Procedure

Type

Designation

Description or Title

Revision or

Date

WO52610930

EEQ Maint.-PM VOP-3009

06/28/2016

WO52650632

EEQ - EMA-1206 LPSI Pump P-67A Motor

03/27/2017

WO52681040

EEQ Maint. - PM VOP-3015

03/18/2017

WO52681204

EEQ Maint.-PM VOP-3012

07/25/2017

WO52753971

EEQ - EMA-1206 LPSI Pump P-67A Motor

09/18/2018

WO52765497

Thermalscan Equip.- P-67A Motor/Breaker

06/20/2018

WO52778170

RI-59C - LTOP Pressure Transmitter Cals

11/08/2018

WO52779578

QO-2X - Recirculation Actuation System

12/19/2014

WO52785113

P-67A MTR/PMP Oil Change

03/25/2019

WO52827608

Thermalscan Equip.- P-67A Motor/Breaker

06/18/2019