ML19290C080
| ML19290C080 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 07/27/1979 |
| From: | Muller D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Case E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19290C074 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-GTECI-A-24, REF-GTECI-EL, TASK-A-24, TASK-OR NUDOCS 8001090136 | |
| Download: ML19290C080 (1) | |
Text
.
'**"'t UNITED STATES fi NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 1
3 wasainoTon. o. c. 20sss
'o, E
JUL 2 71979 MEMORANDUM FOR:
E. G. Case, Chairman Technical Activities Steering Committee FROM:
D. R. Muller, Acting Director, Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis, NRR
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE ACTIVITIES RELATED TO GENERIC TASK A-24, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT In accordance with your memo of July 16, 1979, DSE has reviewed the recommenda-tions regarding future activities related to Task A-24, as proposed by S. H.
Hanauer in his July 6, 1979 memo to H. R. Denton.
DSE concludes that option 2 as proposed is acceptable and therefore concurs in S. H. Hanauer's recommendation.
Daniel R. Muller, Acting Director Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis 1730 199 3001090
m%q#
v UNITED STATES 0,,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMisslON y
g r.
j W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\\,,,,/
AUG 2 3 579 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Edson G. Case, Deputy Director, NRR FROM:
Domenic B. Vassallo, Acting Director, DPH
SUBJECT:
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE ACTIVITIES OF TASK A-24 (ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION)
This is in response to your memo of July 16, 1979, in which you reques'ted comments on various options cited in Steve Hanauer's memo of July 6,1979.
We appreciate the manpower difficulties related to the continuation of Task A-24 as originally propcsed.
However, based on the past experience we have had in closing out the issue of environmental qualification on operating license applications when there is significant pressure to complete the review, we would have some difficulty in accepting Option 2.
Our major concern is the loss of momentum we apparently have begun, especially with the participation of ORNL. Therefore, our recommendation is to essentially proceed along the lines of Option 1, but with a reduced effort by ORNL and our technice.1 staff. As I previously indicated, once an effort has been stopped, especially one as involved as this, it is difficult to pick up again to meet an OL schedule.
As Steve Varga indicated in his memo of August 13, 1979 to Steve Hanauer, DPM would be willing to provide some project management support, if this is considered a feasible alternative.
Domenic B. Vassallo, Acting Director Division of Project Management cc:
R. Mattson.
F. Schroeder D. Eisenhut S. Hanauer 1730 200 M. Aycock R. Satterfield
M
-* * ~ %,
U'J11ED ST ATI S NUCt. EAR llEGUt A TOiiY CO.,'.lSSION e.
[
,. ;.[ k w e:<tNGT ON, D. c. 70%5 Q'df
,-l JUL 2 51979 44..
':0fE f0:
E. G. Case, Chairiran Technical Activities Steering Conmittee iM:
Frank Schroeder, Acting Director Division of Systems Safety
'"3JFCT:
iASK A-24 ENVlh0. MENTAL QUALIFICATION OF CLASS IE El.EClRICAL EQUIPMENT I s ecc. :cnd that the Cormittee approve the change in scope and schedule of Task l.cticn Plan A-24 proposed by S. H. Hanauer in his acmo of h.nc 6,1979 to H. R. Denton (Option 2). iio.cver, tei..a..alicn of
,iP-A 2.4 after cc~plclion of the present Phase 1 should not be taken to r,]ly that cor pletion of the revicw v.ork on lead plants is not of O n t '... a d 5 >3hpriority.-
("
' SI =d !iy 1 n. c. :, : t.
Frank Sci.i ceder, Acting Director
~
Division of Systc.as Safety S. ".a oeM cc:
- 0. :* ill :r D. Fi<
hut O."
illo b