ML19276H304

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Insp Rept 50-289/70-07 on 701008-09.No Noncompliance Noted. Areas Inspected:Reactor Vessel Support,Concrete QA Sys & First Insp of Reactor Vessel Since Storage Insp on 700925
ML19276H304
Person / Time
Site: Crane Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/30/1970
From: Brown R, Howard E, Hunnicutt D
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
Shared Package
ML19276H275 List:
References
50-289-70-07, 50-289-70-7, NUDOCS 7910160647
Download: ML19276H304 (4)


Text

/ 9' p' O.

U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION REGICN I DIVISION OF COMPLIANCE Report of Inspection CO Report No. 289/70-7 Licensee:

Metropolitan Edison Company (Met Ed)

(Three Mile Island Unit No. 1)

License No.

CPPR-40 Date of Inspection:

October 8-9, 1970 Date of Previous Inspection:

August 26-28, 1970 Inspected by:

7)(

'd

/OI9/70 D. M Hunnicutt, Reactor Inspector (Principal.)

'Datd "Y

/C/D//*)6 R. L. Brown, Rea tor Inspector (Construction)

Date 9

Reviewed by:

. v Lw A f A-

/O-3dd()

E. M. Howard, Senior Reactor Inspector Date SCOPE A routine, announced inspection was made of Unit No. 1, one of the two 2535 MWt pressurized water reactors (B&W) under construction on Three Mile Island-near Middletown, Pennsylvania.

The inspection effort was directed toward an appraisal of the performance of the licensee-contractor effort of various items listed in PI 3800/2 and included an inspection of Attachment C - Contain:

" Concrete" (4600) and " Welding" (4800), Attachment E-Other Class I Structures,

" Reactor Vessel Support" (5400) and Attachment J - Reactor Vessel (4905).

SUMMARY

Safety Items - None Nonconformance Items - None Other Significant Items - None

!419 172 Status of Previously Reported Problems - Identifying tags for electrical sys-tems are being protected to reduce " fade-out".

(See paragraph G.2)

The CONAM Laboratory NDT procedures have been qualified according to NAVSHIPS 250-1500 requirements to fulfill the FSAR require =cnt, Sectica 6.1.2.4 and USAS B 31.7, Appendix B-110.1 commitments (C0 Report No. 289/70-6, paragraph E).

(See paragraph G.1) t7 91016 0 h[

/fC

.. Management Interview - An exit interview was held with Messrs. Hree:uch, Fant, and Lambert on October 9, 1970.

The inspector stated that the present steam generator inspection schedule of once per month appears ta be lengthy and that the inspeccion requirements should be covered by an adequate procedure. No procedure was found to exist.

Mr. Hreczuch stated the conments would be eval-usted and appropriate action taken.

The inspector stated that the' reactor vessel and the reactor vessel head did not have storage inspection log (s) or inspection forms to record inspection results.

'The inspector stated that no inspection has been performed en the reactor vessel since the receiving inspection on September 25, 1970.

Mr. Hreczuch stated that an inspection would be perfomed in the near future as required by the appropriate procedure and.that an inspection fom would be available for review during the next inspection at the site.

Concrete - The inspectors perfomed a review of the QC system in accordance with Attachment C - Containment, " Concrete", PI 3800/2.

The inspection covered G

items 4605.04.e.2, 4605.06.a.8, 4805.03, 4805.04.e.3, 4805.04.g.3, g.4 and g.5.

The procedures, instructions and specifications are in agreement with commit-ments in the FSAR.

No deficiencies or omissions in procedures and record keepitig related to concrete sampling, testing, rebar splicing or placement were observed during the inspection.

Reactor Vessel Succort (RVS)

'The inspector perfomed a review of the QC syg-tem for the RVS in accordance with Attachment E - Other Class I Structures,

" Structures and Supports", PI 3800/2.

The inspection covered items 5405.03, 5405.04.b.1 through and including f.5, 5405.05.a.1, a.2, and a.3, and 5405.06

.a.2 and a.3.

The procedures, instructions and specificati ns are in agreement with commitments in the FSAR.

No deficiencies or omissions in procedures or record keeping related to materials, testing, handling, ins tallation or imple-mentacion of QC inspections were observed during the inspection.

Reactor Vessel - The inspector perfomed a review of items -905.05.a.1, a.2, and a.4 in accordance with Attachment J - Reactor Vessel, ?! 3800/2.

The reactor vessel has been in storage since September 25, 1970, when receiving inspection was performed.

No inspection has been performei since.

UE&C Prb-cedure NCP-5, Revision 0, states that the desiccant protectica shall be moni-tored approximately every two weeks and recorded on "Perie,dic Component In-spection", Form SF-SU-113.

O Mr. Hrecauch assured the inspector that the inspection woula he perfomed in the near future and that an inspection

  • form (SF-SU-ll3) we id be-at the storage site for inspection during the next routine site inspectie:.

1419 173

/.$'

9 The receiving inspection report indicated that three nozzles (1-14 inch core flooding and 2-28 ' inch reactor coolant) had been slightly marred during transit.

These nozzles are scheduled to undergo visual and dye penetrant examination by B&W on October 12, 1970.

A re-audit was performed under PI 3800/2 of those items relating to "Other Class I Structures" which included 4805.04.a.1 through g.2.

Results of this audit was consistent with the previous audit with do deficiencies found.

DETAILS A.

Persons Contacted Met Ed Mr. Gene Hreczuch, Construction Engineer Mr. W. Shepard, Resident Engineer (Mechanical and Civil)

Mr. L. Lundstrom, Quality Assurance UE&C Mr. J. E. Fant, Site QC Manager Mr. David Lambert, QA Inspector Mr. Paul Dailey, QC Engineer B.

Construction Status Mr. Hreczuch estimated that Unit No. I was approximately 52% complete, based on man hours expended.

C.

Grinnell Comoany Audit by Met Ed Mr. L. Lundstrom, Met Ed QA, performed an audit of the Grinnell Company, Warren, Ohio, on October 8, 1970.

Mr. Lundstrom stated that this audit re-vealed several discrepancies, including certifications misfiled, omissions in certification, and incomplete records.

D.

Grinnell Documentation Mr. Hreczuch stated that Grinnell Company does not submit certifications until the contract has been completed.

The inspector stated that failure to have adequate certification prior to installing a component is in nonconform-G ance with Appendix B, 10 CFR 50.

Mr. Hrecauch stated that Met Ed has discussed this problem with Grinnell but has not resolved the problem.

1419 174

l[

O E.

Major Components The following major components have been received at the construction site:

1.

One of the two steam generators.

The second steam generator is scheduled to arrive at the construction sit about December, 1970.

2.

The reactor vessel and reactor vessel head.

3.

The stator, high pressure and both low pressure turbines, including casings and installation hardware, have been placed in the turbine hall Erection and installation of these components is in progress.

F.

Tendon Grout The inspector requested information on the type of grout and other pertinen information concerning grouting around the containment vesse.1 tendons.

Mr.

Hreczuch stated that GAI has not completed a study of this item and that the information was not available at that time.

O G.

Followup Items (PI 3800/1, N-14) 1.

NDT Procedures

  • Mr. Hreczuch and site records indicated that the CONAM Laboratory NDT procedures have been qualified according to NAVSHIPS 250-1500 require-ments.

During a previous inspection, the inspectors had found that the CONAM procedures had not been qualified as required by the FSAR, Section 6.1.2.4 and USAS B 31.7, Appendix B-110.1.

This item is con-sidered to be resolved.

2.

Identifying Tacs for Electrical Systems **

Messrs. Kopp and Fant stated that a new method for preserving identifi-cation tags has been developed to reduce " fade-out".

Paper tags are now filled out with india ink, sprayed with "krylon" to water proof the tag and the tag is then encased in a plastic envelope and the envelope folded to aseure protection from the elements.

The encased tag is then securely attached to the item identified.

H.

DRL and Consultant Site Visit 419 175 Drs. N. W. Newmark and W. J. Hall, Consultants to DRS, and D. Ross, DRL, visited the construction site on October 8, 1970.

The purpose of the visit was to acquaint Drs. Newmark and Hall with the facility and to observe construction G

related to seismic design.

The inspector accompanied the Consultants and Mr.

Ross on the olant tour conducted by Met Ed personnel.

The inspector attended an informal meeting held subsequent to the plant tour in which topics of interest to the Consultants and DRL were discussed with Met Ed and the site AE.

xCO Report No. 269/70-0, paragrapn E.

    • C0 Report No. 289/70-6, paragraph H.2.