ML19261E955
| ML19261E955 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 10/26/1973 |
| From: | Nash D US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19261E929 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7910171009 | |
| Download: ML19261E955 (1) | |
Text
~
~
'THREE MILE ISLAfID fiUCLEAR STATI0ft -- DOCKET N0. 50-289 Supplementary Testimony on Cost of Containment Repouring By Darrel A. flash Contention 10 "The extent to which the tiEPA review concerning cost-benefit analysis and alternatives may not be complete in that the following point (s) have not been fully analyzed or included:
(d) The cost of containment repouring" The Applicant has provided information that the cost to repair the Three Mile Island Unit 1 containment ring girder was approxi-mately $3 million.
I believe this figure is essentially correct.
It was not included in the cost benefit analysis because the analysis was made prior to the incurrence of these costs.
Since its magni-tude is a low percentage of total capital costs, it does not change the conclusions of the cost benefit analysis.
J 1483 254 i
79101710cf7
,