ML19260D449
| ML19260D449 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png |
| Issue date: | 01/10/1980 |
| From: | Goodwin C PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | Engelken R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19260D447 | List: |
| References | |
| 800125, NUDOCS 8002110063 | |
| Download: ML19260D449 (2) | |
Text
.
wf = PortlandGeneralElectricCompany V
Cnr. p.ko:wn.Jt tuont V,:e Pre @nt January 10, 1980
. <':. W- ??%
.., ', 'j pg%'E!)]K rM fh d,
e
'IAk j~' '20 jg%
Mr. R. H. Engelken, Director e.
.f US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region V
,./
Q' 1990 North California Blvd.
/.
Walnut Creek, California 94596 n
c.
o
Dear Sir:
Attached is our response to a notice of violation that resulted from an inspection of the Trojan Nuclear Plant conducted by members of the Region V staff on November 6-8, 1979.
During this inspection, it was determined that one item at the plant was not conducted in full compliance with NRC require-ments. Our response details the action taken to correct the infraction and corrective steps which have been taken to avoid further violations.
Sincerely, b
l r
?)
C. Goodwin, Jr.
jCg Assistant Vice President CG/RPS:ga Thermal Operations & Maintenance CQ 1939 123 gesso 86 e S W Simon 9 est. Pena C agon 97204 g@/ /
Portland General ElechicCompany
%'r ' ? [C 6
,(D RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION A'
Nr 1gst v"
FINDING Paragraph 2.C(7) of the Trojan facility license, NRC License No. NPF-1, requires activities to which a quality assurance program is applicable (except for piping supports) to be conducted in accordance with the Quality Assurance Program for Operation.
Section II.B.4 of Trojan Quality Assurance Procedure QAP-ll-1 requires test results to be reviewed and specifies actions to be taken when test results do not meet acceptance criteria.
Contrary to these requirements, the test results for a periodic operating test of the "C" service water pump performed on September 30, 1979 were approved by responsible reviewers even though recorded pump discharge pressure was less than the specified minimum and the actions specified for unacceptable test results were not taken.
CORRECTIVE ACTION The periodic operating test of the "C" service water pump was conducted on November 8, 1979, and the pump discharge pressure was verified to be above the minimum specified in the Technical Specifications.
Sin'
- he condition noted in the September 30, 1979 test was not present, it u 4 :possible to determine the cause for the low pressure reading that occur. - on that day.
In addition, other periodic operating tests conducted during the last six months were reviewed to determine if the problem was widespread or limited to the specific item noted. Our review failed to find any other discrep-ancies and, as a result, we have concluded that this is an isolated event and is not indicative of a general problem. This infraction has been discussed with all members of the Plant Engineering staff to remind them of their responsibilities in reviewing test results and ensuring that the surveillance requirements of the Technical Specifications are satisfied.
hh 9