ML19253B658
| ML19253B658 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 06/20/1974 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19253B649 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-289-74-25, NUDOCS 7910160744 | |
| Download: ML19253B658 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000289/1974025
Text
^
-s
.
ENCLOSURE 1
.
-
,
DESCRIPTION OF VIOLATIONS
Metropolitan Edison Company
Readic.g, Pennsylvania
i
Docket No. 50-289
License No. DPR-50
Certain activities under your license appe?r to be in violation of AEC
requirements as indicated below:
The following violation is considered to be of Category II severity.
j
,1.
The FSAR Section 1A, Operating Quality Assurance Plan,Section VI,
-
ytf[- Document Control, states in pac t:
". . .The Generation Division doc-
??" ument control procedure further requires that each Manager and Station
,
Superintendent provide in their procedures for measures:
...to ensure
that approved changes be promptly transmitted for incorporation into
documents; and to ensure that cisolete or superseded documents are
eliminated from the system and not used..."
~ ~ " . -
Contrary to the above:
.~. a.
On June 4, 1974, the Makeup and Purification System was being
lined up during preparations for initial criticality with the
- -
Control Room Working Copy of OP 1104-2 Revision 1, although the
Control Room File Copy of OP 1104-2 was Revision 2.
The effective
-
revision of this procedure was Revision 3 which had been distributed
on May 24, 1974,
i
I
b.
On bby 30, 1974 the' Decay Heat Removal System was lined up during
preparations for initial criticality in accordance with OP 1104-4.
The valves were positioned to the valve checklist, Enclosure I,
Revision 0.
The. correct revision of Enclosure I was Revision 2,
dated April 27, 1974.
-
.
0
In both of these instances, the differences between the supersefed
and revised procedures included the following:
1) Valves being
added to the list of things to be checked; 2) Valve positions
being changed from open to closed and vice versa; and 3) Valve
status being changed from " closed" to " locked closed", etc.
The following violation is considered to be of Category III severity.
2.
The FSAR Section IA, Operating Quality Assurance Plan, Secticn VI,
Document Control states in part:
" ..The Superintendent of the
,.'MI
.
Station Unit I will ensure that no changes are made to site instruc-
tions, procedures, and drawings unless such changes are approved by
the appropriate approving organization..."
1445
195
- 7910280 3
_
,
.
.
.
.
-2-
I
, v*
.
.
l
Contrary to the above, the Waste Gas Disposal System was lined
up during preparations for initial criticality in accordance with
OP 1104-27.
The Control Room Working Copy of this procedure had
,
'
changes to valve, level indicator and electrical panel designators
on Pages' 5 and 6 without any approval indicated.
J
0
1
6
-
)) .-
e r;
.
S
- _
_
. , .
e
.
l
.
t
.
4
.
1445
196
'